I Testify Against The Jews

I TESTIFY

AGAINST THE JEWS

By

Robert Edward Edmondson

Third Edition
1985

Sons of Liberty
P.O. Box 214
Metairie, LA 70004

First Printing 1953
Second Printing 1954

(B>

PRO PATRIA

The Mighty Force that gave—

To Greece its Eternal Beauty and Imperishable Glory
To Rome its Imperial Power and Sublime Grandeur
To America its Immortal Constitution
Is not dead!

It still lives

To Save The Republic of Washington-Franklin-Lincoln,

At the inception of the patriotic crusade for Unde Sam herein described,
face to face with devastating horror—and the Road to the Right—these elemental
questions posed themselves:

Since the "Men of 76'’ patriotically risked "their lives, their fortunes and
their sacred honor” for this Republic, can true citizens endowed with so royal
a birthright do less in time of National Peril?

Should not every American on whom it bestowed surplus wealth, hold
such in trust and devote it to needed defence when danger threatens the
Republic?

The only answer to each question was an emphatic "Yes!”

(C)

dedication

This book is humbly dedicated to

Marian Louise Edmondson, who, defying dual terror, faithfully stood
besrdf herhusband^o die before her tune February 22. 1952, a heart attack
victim. I bear testimony that she justified her existence by word and deed.

To "The Twenty Immortals." that inspired band of fearless Amertcan

lawyers, who. embattled in a _ courtr0 °y c^LturiCvemus the New

far beyond the Cali of Duty m e _ak t D WON' And

Deal might, and in drfei ^f ^ maintained the

received the deserved judicial high-honor tri&ute.

highest traditions of your profession.

And to that magnificently courageous company of "f.re-tested" men and
-ciVnllv smeared by New Dealer dominated newspapers of the

™“ ., r,i... ■ -h.. .*.»«,.11, h...,l,c.« .11

dl “le Sit, gJ bach blow for blow-I tahe off my hat m reverent,al
salute to rare individualistic valor.

*-■* is rsr&rAty; sas

" e V r of direful fociabLc shyers, ons, which those heroic unsung militant
Christian soldiers then envis.oned and, cherishing oo "passion for anonym,tv
m ■ "invisible enemy") they patriotically broadcast signed warnings, to

» l —«-«— ^

menacing The Republic.

1 would not be true to them nor to myself were I to fail, in the current
crisis, to "stand up and be counted" publicly—For The Repub ,c.

To Them All: HONOR! PEACE'. HAPPINESS!

WHY "I TESTIFY”

"Inspection of the alleged libelous documents in this case will show the
court that they are the result of mature study of the literature and press of the
world. The defendant will have the right to occupy the time of the jury to
read into the record a mass of material without end. There is no telling how-
many months trial might consume. It would develop racial and religious antagon¬
isms chat would rock the foundations of the community.

The foregoing court argument was made May 2, 1938, by Defence Counsel
Wise for Robert Edward Edmondson following backdown dismissal pleas by
five amicus curiae, whose leadership is credited with having instigated a com¬
munistic misleading sectarian indictment, a violation of state and national
guarantees of freedom of the press, and which petitions were succeeded on
May 10, 1938, by an unconditional formal dismissal of the case by N. Y.
Judge Wallace.

With whatever authority he may have been equipped by more than half a
century of specialization in the publicity fields of politico-economic and affili¬
ated problems, this author, editor, lecturer and publisher has no hesitancy in
emphatically stating if that New York group-libel case had progressed normally
to a logical end the enormous cumulative explosive power generated would have
smashed any news suppression-dam ever erected, and "rocked the foundations”
of The Republic from coast to coast. The tremendous import of factual ex¬
posures of appalling high treason by the Roosevelt New Deal would have
inescapably elevated righteous citizen-rage to transcendental heights, and boiling
passions might well have produced civil commotion of great intensity, with
ramifications to the National boundaries—and beyond.

The Fire of Truth widely broadcast then would have been later swept into
a prairie conflagration through the confirming sequel in 1942-7 of the Roose¬
velt mass-case travesty on justice at Washington, D. C., dismissed in 1947, for
the high news value of the first would have been revivified and expanded by the
overt acts laid bare by the second persecution, as to the treacherous New' Deal
conspiracy with its perversion of tolerance.

Weak Legal Evidence Unmasked

The premature dismissals in both the New York and Washington plot-
cases were due to early unmasking of the irrelevant and weak legal "evidence’’
presented by the Roosevelt prosecutions, defence counsel having been able to
prove that there was no state law covering the absurd, intolerant and proven
false N. Y. City prejudiced indictment. The Department of Justice not only
failed to establish trial jurisdiction in the District of Columbia, but the defense
so effectively cited U. S. Supreme Court precedent-decisions invalidating the
prosecution that finally the prosecutor himself admitted he "had no case" in
the Washington Communistic action.

RUSSIAN ANTI-SEMITISM PURGES

The 1952-3 puzzling spectacle of "Anti-Semitism purges in Russia s
"Semitic'-created Communist Government has revived and endowed with new
life the collateral subject matter of the mass-documentation herein. That alone
would have justified this presentation as a result-sequel of the American
Peoples repudiation of the New Deal, Nov. 4, 1952, very closely related to
"Anti-Semitism," calling for a public explanation of this multi-meaning mystery
term, which is analyzed herein.

"President Eisenhower has appointed Lewis L. Strauss, a Special Assistant,
to serve as liaison advisor on atomic energy matters.”—Washington special to
N. Y. Times, March 10, 1953.

Advice from such a source would be as unacceptable to this writer as would
counsel from U. S. Ambassador Dillon to France. Both are prominent jews.
Strauss was not only a partner of the international banking firm of Kuhn, Loeb
& Co but served che Truman regime as a member of the Atomic Energy Com¬
mission. Dillon was head of the Wall St. banking firm of Dillon, Reed & Co.

Individuals referred to herein who appear to this reporter to be m un-
American associations, are, so far as he knows, entirely true to their convictions;
but HIS DUTY to The Republic and the Fourth Estate requires him to put his
findings before the Bar of American Public Opinion for its enlightenment and

action.

The writer has dared to hope that this up-to-date reproduction of vitally
important and hitherto unpublished material will do the job of effectually educat¬
ing his fellow countrymen as to the tremendous menace of a still operating
'"clear and present danger" to the existence of The Republic, which danger
has merely been driven "underground” temporarily by the Anti-New Deal man¬
date of last November, and continues to invisibly carry on its plans for the
destruction of national governments and religions.

And he sincerely believes that the aforesaid Anti-New Deal repudiation
(Only Liberation Step No. 1) would have occurred many years prior to 1952
but for the inadvertent judicial suppression of the "real issue” testimony in¬
herent in the evidence contained in the two dismissed Edmondson cases hereto¬
fore mentioned.

While publicity per se is obviously no treat for a news reporter veteran,
being human he would naturally welcome the accolade of general public vindi¬
cation denied by free speech suppression; but his chief reward and great hap¬
piness lie in the conviction that he has performed to the best of the ability with
which he has been endowed, the worthwhile task of exposing Wrong to his
blinded fellow-countrymen by holding high the Torch of Right without fear or
favor, in a firm belief that faith without works is sterile, and that "Pitiless
Publicity is the Cure for Public Evils.”

AMERICAN BAR OF PUBLIC OPINION

Above all, the author felt it would be dereliction in high duty not to
promptly distribute this invaluable legacy throughout The Republic—and be¬
yond—considering the vital intra-national import of its exclusive, extensive and
unique confessional-documentation, which he had been privileged to compile.
Complimentary first copies of this book were therefore placed in '‘key quarters."

The author has elaborated The Real Issue in the formally filed Petition to
Congress (made under oath) quoted herein and made a part hereof; for through
only such a publicity channel can it be adequately placed before the "Court of
Last Resort"—the American Bar of Public Opinion—and final decision had as
to whether or not our Republic is to be destroyed by alienism.

With such American tribunal I rest my case supremely confident that the
unimpeachable guilt-confessions "from the horse’s mouth" herein documented,
will bring conviction and emancipation action before it is too late.

Practically all the Petition evidence passed the court libel test with a
judicial precedent-pronouncement that under American law no large group
"defamation" broadcast is actionable if publication is motivated by concern for
the public welfare and circulated in good faith. In this connection it is under¬
stood that the N. Y. judge’s 1938 dismissal of the Edmondson group libel case
was in response to the 1936 annual meeting dictum issued by the American
Institute of Law at Washington, D. C.. reported by the N. Y. Times of May 9,
1936, saying that "where the circumstances are such as to induce a reasonable
belief that factors exist which affect a sufficiently important public interest,"
existing laws should be changed.

Under the influence of the high quality of the Petition evidence the new
Congress, which is already responding to constituency pressure for exhaustive
investigation of New Deal subversions, should welcome this hitherto un-
published-and-broadcast revealing documentation-identification.

Communist ideology ever howls for "academic freedom” in its "pull¬
down" propaganda of destruction. How can you even practice academic freedom
until you have a base on and from which to operate? To what do American
citizens owe first allegiance, to academic freedom or constitutional freedom of
speech and press! Without the latter vantage point academic freedom cannot
even exist. You may work to improve that base, not to destroy it. The U. S.
Constitution does not authorize its citizens to subvert it—that is treason to it and
also to academic freedom. As a matter of simple self-preservation the Constitu¬
tion must impose on its citizenship the high DUTY of defending it. And you
can’t dodge the consequences of dodging your responsibilities.

The exposure seems so apt and well-deserved that I cannot refrain from
paraphrasing below against these academic fanatics a philippic delivered to
anf i-assimilationists some years'ago by a once great American citizen, viz.: More
and more of late do we see the very foundations of that majestic and beneficent
structure of The Republic clamorously assailed by those to whom it opened
wide the Portals of Freedom. But they have been blinded by the glare of
Liberty. Blinded, they dare force their guidance on Americans who for genera¬
tions have walked in the Light of Liberty. Drunk with the strong wine of Free¬
dom, they presume to impose their reeling gait upon citizens to whom Freedom
has been a pure and refreshing fountain for a century and a half.

EXHAUSTIVE RESEARCH TO B. C.

The author’s exhaustive research, in an earnest attempt to isolate and
identify the genesis, origins and promoters of Communism, went back through
re-did history Before Christ; thence downward through the centuries to
"Proofs of a Conspiracy against all Religions and Government, by John Robi¬
son Professor of Natural History and Secretary of the Royal Society of ^mhurg,
Scotland (1798) ; which book blazed "The T rail ot the Serpent of subcersmn
The Illuminatti ' to the sequel of the French Revolution, into the Bolshevist
Marxianholocaust, and thence First and Second World Wars, to the present
Soviet internationalist threat to all nations.

No other book like this is in existence.'It is a memoir-recital of a man now
in his eighties who, standing alone and childless m the shadow of inevit¬
ability, obviously can have no ulterior or selfish motive in producing ic.

While this report to countrymen covers the high spots, a general review of
correlative and corroborative evidence discloses an additiom, similar mass or
what newspapermen call "good sniff" alter applying the acid test of cold

print’* inspection.

Its "official” character is attested by the fact that it is a Constitutional
"Petition to Congress,’’ which is the representative of the American ° f
Public Opinion, and therefore its legality cannot be successfully challenge
Hus the further fact that such a status is affirmed by the following notaned
oath which conveyed the Peticion to the Congress:

''Personally appeared before me a notary public in and for the County of
Deschutes of the State of Oregon, Robert Edward Edmondson, who swore that
the foregoing Petition to Congress dared April 1, 1953, was written compiled,
published and circulated solely by him; that all this was done to the bes of his
knowledge and belief with honest conviction as to the truth of the matter pre¬
sented therein with reasonable interpretations, and which he broadcast whh the
°ood motive of public interest, for the welfare and protection of The Republic
of the United States of America; and that said Rooert Edward Edmondson
hereby offers one thousand dollars for proof that the author has intentionally
falsified any part of said production."

In conclusion, speaking from the independent vantage point of half a
century of strenuous service in the highly educative fields of The Fourth Estate,
the logic of events impels the judgment that the average Occidental mind is at a
loss to comprehend and interpret the fantastic aims and sadist cruelty of cir¬
cuitous Oriental thinking as exposed herein; and most Americans seem n0(: °™y
unable to grasp the realities but are actually unwilling to accept as yet the
sinister plot-pattern now progressively unfolding. Witness: It required two
decades of revolutionary suppression by the Roosevelt New Dealers merely to
arouse the American People to take Liberation Step No. 1 on November 4, 1952.

MUST "THE LUNATIC FRINGE" BE SUMMONED "ONCE MORE
TO THE BREACH?”

Dated April 1, 1953
At Bend, Oregon
P. O. Box No, 854

(H)

(Summary of Book Contents)
PETITION TO CONGRESS HIGH-LIGHTS

SECTION ONE, order of presentation: New Deal N. Y.-Washington
indictments—unconditional Dismissals—Seven years of persecution—Patriotic
Publicity Crusade origins 1933-4—Communistic New Deal called "Jew Deal’’
by leading Jew—Evolution of "Jewish-Anti-Americanism” slogan—1936 Arrest
and imprisonment in N. Y. "Tombs” Jail—Charge "Libel of all persons of the
Jewish Religion” for unmasking Jewish Communism—"Out on Bail,” cmsad-
ing—In 1938 Jews petition court to dismiss indictment as free speech violation—
Unconditional Dismissal—Anti-Communist Publicity Crusade continued to Nov.
30, 1940—Ill-health Vacation: including unbelievably boastful Jewish detailed
and written DOCUMENTED CONFESSIONS OF SADISTIC SECRET PLOT¬
TING, INVISIBLE SABOTAGE, INTERNATIONALIST AND INTERNAL
SOCIALISTIC REVOLUTION TO OVERTHROW THE U. S„ its form of
government and its Christian foundation, through civil war.

SECTION TWO, Order of presentation: New Deal "seditious conspiracy’’
indictments at Washington 1942—Mass-Trial 1944—Judge’s death in Novem¬
ber causes "mis-trial”—Unconditional Dismissal of Communistic Mass-Case in
November, 1947—Persecution tactics at "Mess’’-Trial exposed by daily diary
reports from Defendant Edmondson’s wife—Deadly Parallel—Court Exhibits
uncover Communist Treason Warmongering — FDR Jewish Ancestry — New
Deal conspiracy against defendants proved—Edmondson Testimonials and Bio¬
graphical Sketch—ANALYSIS OF ANTI-SEMITISM—1952-3 Russian Jew
Purges explained; Stalin Successors unmasked—Jewish Problem in solution—
A REMEDY—including two decades of irrefutable record-proof of almost
incredible internal and internationalist ACTS OF PLANNED NEW DEAL
HIGH TREASON to The Constitutional Republic of the U. S. A., its political,
educational and religious institutions, its Press and its Radio Systems,

A SOCIAL JUSTICE
Politico-Economic Solution
of

The Jewish World Problem

PETITION TO CONGRESS

This is a "Petition To Congress For Redress Of Grievances, Succor and
Relief.”

It is hereby filed with Congress under the authority of the Constitution of
the United States of America, by the undersigned Robert Edward Edmondson,
reporter, editor and publisher, a native-born citizen of pre-American Revolution
ancestry Scotch descent, at present a legal voting resident of the State of
Oregon, domiciled at Bend in Deschutes County; and who repeatedly voted
against the Roosevelt Administration from its New Deal inception, casting
his ballot November 4, 1952, for the straight Republican ticket.

During 1942-44 your Petitioner was indicted by the Roosevelt Adminis¬
tration’s Department of Justice, charged with "seditious conspiracy,” based
on a free-speech non-profit patriotic-publicity peace-time one-man crusade
exposing by documentation subversive Communism, its origins and propaganda,
with the good motive of defending, protecting and preserving our Republic,
beginning at the end of 1933 and concluding November 30, 1940.

Trial by Indictment No. 73086 of January 3, 1944, was begun in the
U. S, District Court for the District of Columbia at Washington, D. C. early
in 1944 before Chief Justice Eicher.

On November 22, 1946, following failure of the New Deal prosecution
to make a case after years of investigation and mistrial, the U. S. District Court
for the District of Columbia, by Chief Justice Laws, unconditionally dismissed
indictments as a travesty on justice; with the public press terming the action a
violation of the free speech amendment to the United States Constitution, while
the Washington Times-Herald Nov. 23, 1946, printed: "The case was bred in
malice, prosecuted in hate and pursued in bigotry.”

Effective July 31, 1947, the U. S. Court of Appeals in Washington, D. C.
AFFIRMED the lower court dismissal decision, ending the false mass-con¬
spiracy charges after five years of futile prosecution by the Roosevelt Depart¬
ment of Justice, concluding with the following words:

"In this case the record shows that from January, 1946, to the dismissal
order entered near the end of that year the trial court, AT THE INSTANCE
of some of the defendants, .AGAIN AND AGAIN SOUGHT TO COMPEL
ACTION WHICH WOULD EITHER RESULT IN A TRIAL OR DIS¬
MISSAL.

"Its final decision to adopt the latter course seems to us ALTOGETHER
REASONABLE AND PROPER, AND IN FACT WE ARE NOT PREPARED
TO SAY THAT IT WAS NOT COMPELLED, in the light of the facts then
shown to exist.”

1

FULL TEXT OF DISMISSAL DECISION

Below is copy of the complete text of the unconditional dismissal decision of the
Washington ' Mas -Case " as handed down on Nov. 22, 1946, by Chief Justice Laws and
^held by the U. S. Court of Appeals effective July 31, 1947, ending the prosecution.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE U, S,
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

United States of America j

vs - V Criminal No. 73086.

Jos. E. McWilliams et al, l

Defendants 1

MEMORANDUM ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS

These cases are before me on motions to dismiss, lately filed by permission of the

C ° U UmU yesterday, so far as the Court has been informed the prosecution has been
chiefly entrusted to O. John Rogge, Spl. Asst, to the Arty. Gen.

On Tan ?5 1946, when the Court heard previous motions to dismiss Mr Rogge
stated that in view of late decisions of the Supreme Court of the L. S., he felt doubtful
as to whether a conviction of the defendants would be sustained. Counsel explained this
was his per/oil opinion; that the Dept of Justice had not. taken a postion in the
matter, and for this reason he was no: at liberty to stare us opinion.

Two weeks later Mr Rogge again appeared before the Court upon further hearings
of the mod'nfto d!s“ ss . Th? Cola <Xd whe.he, ho then was m a post.ton to tell
whether the prosecution wished to proceed -with the case.

The Court was requested to give the Government a reasonable amount of time to
answer thA question However, on this occasion the Chief Prosecutor again stated that,
Ite c„*S« in g Supreme Court decisions In arable cases, tt was h,s personal v.ew
that it was doubtful whether a conviciuon would be sustained.

The Court then cook the question of dismissing the cases under advisement.

On Mar. 1 1946, while the matter was pending under advisement, counsel for the
nrosecution applied to the Court to postpone its ruling for a period of thirty days,
alS it wa P s P bel:eved certain testimony might be available trom witnesses in Germany
which would directlv establish guilt of certain of the uefendants.

When this application was presented it was stated the Attorney-General wished to
send Mr. Rogge to Germany to make an investigation. Counsel for defendants objected.

While unusual in the midst of a long-pending criminal case to permit an mvestiga-
non to endeavor to build up a doubtful case, I decided, because the charges were serious
and access to possible evidence previously had been toreclosed by the war with Germany,

I should permit time for the investigation.

Accordingly the prosecution was granted until Apr. 30. 1946, a longer time than
had been nskfd A written memorandum filed by the Court granting this time that on
or before April 30 1946. counsel for the prosecution will be expecteu to advise the Court
in writing P (copy’to be sent to each defendant) whether prosecution of the case is
desired' fiso whether, in his judgement, a conviction of defendants if one is obtained,
mai be’sustained under controlling decisions of the Supreme Court of the U. S.

On Aor 30 1946 a memorandum was filed by one of counsel for the prosecution,
stating th£ prosecution was desired, "provided the prosecutions investrgation being
presently conducted in Germany elicits additional evidence of gu> t of defendants.
This memorandum stated that the investigation had not been completed, and that 45
davs additional time would be required.

While I did not specifically grant the additional time to complete the investigation
it eventuated that Government counsel was able to secure this time, because it was not
until May 18, 1946. that the motions to dismiss the indictments were over-ruled.

The case' was called on Sept. 20. 1946, for the purpose of setting a date for trial.
On this occasion, Chief Prosecutor Rogge, being asked the third time in eight months,

2

the attitude of the prosecution, stated that there still remained in his mind the question
■whether there was sufficient evidence to meet the test of the Supreme Court cases. He
said he had serious doubts on this point, as he previously had advised the Court, but
that the Dt-pt. of Justice wished to suggest a trial date in December.

Mr. Rogge informed the Court that an analysis he had made of evidence found in
Germany had been turned over to the Dept, of Justice the previous week.

Motion to Dismiss Granted

Inasmuch as Mr. Rogge informed the Court, on three occasions, one after a lengthv
investigation in Germany, had stated to the Court his serious doubts of a successful
prosecution, a renewal of the motions to dismiss was permitted. The motions to dismiss
now' under consideration then were filed.

On yesterday, at the time of the hearing upon these motions. Mr. Rogge -was not
present representing the prosecution. Theron Lamar Caudle, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the
first time entered his appearance in behalf of the prosecution.

Mr. Caudle stated the Dept, wished to prosecute all of the cases and to have a
date set for the trial; that the Dept, did not share the doubts of Mr. Rogge.

The Court requested Mr. Caudle to state his reasons why those now in charge had
a different view' from Mr. Rogge.

In answer, Mr. Caudle made no statement of reasons.

However, he offered to submit to the Court a trial brief which had been prepared
and a written report of Mr. Rogge made to the Atty. Gen. Asked -whether these docu¬
ments would also be made available to the defendants, prosecutor stated they would not.

Counsel for the defendants objected to the Court’s examining the documents withouc
copies being furnished them.

The Court then informed counsel that by reason of the recent condemnation by the
Conference of Senior Circuit Judges of the U.S., at a meeting presided over by the Chief
justice of the U.S., of the practice prevailing in some districts of trial judges receiving
from the prosecution a brief or other documents not furnished opposing counsel, he was
not in a position to consider the trial brief and the report of Mr. Rogge.

The defendants have undergone before a Court and jury part of a trial which ended
on Nov. 29, 19-44, by reason of the sudden death of the presiding justice. The prosecution
was still in progress at the conclusion of this trial, which had been under way for eight
months. Eighteen thousand pages of testimony were taken and 1100 documents were
introduced in evidence. The prosecution was formally brought to a dose Dec. 7, 1944.

Beginning on Dec. 9, 1944, and from time to time thereafter, various defendants
have sought a speedy trial of their cases. For nearly two years such a trial has not been
made possible-for them. Their Constitutional right to a speedy trial has been denied.

I can reach no other conclusion than that there is a serious doubt as to validity of
these cases. More than eight months is an abnormally long time to be required by the
prosecution to establish guilt in a dear case. One would expect convincing testimony of
guile to be fully adduced long before the expiration of Such a length of time.

When a retrial was in prospect, the Chief Prosecutor, who, mote than any other
person, is familiar with the cases, expressed his doubts as to sustaining a conviction;
and because of these doubts made the unusual request for permission to hold the question
of their retrial in abeyance until he could make further investigation into the facts. Not
only two times before this request was made, but on one occasion lately, after a lengthy
investigation had been completed in Germany, this Court asked the prosecution whether
it desired to retry 'the case. Until yesterday, there was no answer that it did.

If these defendants are guilty, it would seem that any serious doubts as to their
guilt would be resolved in more than five years of intensive investigation by able counsel
and investigators of the Dept, of Justice.

If they were clearly guilty, the prosecution should have unwaveringly assured the
Court to this effect, at least upon the completion of the investigation in Germany.

Usually the Court will permit the prosecutor to decide whether he will bring a
case to trial; but when it appears, as here, there is serious doubt as to the success of
the case, and that the defendants, because of long delays granted over their objections,
cannot obtain a fair trial, the Court should exercise its discretion to deny prosecution. It
would be both unjust and un-American to do otherwise.

The defendants have been before the Cour& upon these charges for nearly four and
one-half years. AH of them were brought here from other parts of the country to stand
trial. Because of the impoverished state of the defendants, they were represented by
counsel not of their own choice but assigned by the Court to serve without compensation.

As in all long-delayed cases, the witnesses now are scattered; some are not accessible.

3

more particularly to the defendants who are without funds: the memories of witnesses
as to events occurring many years ago, are not clear. It is for these reasons, among others,
that the Constitution of the U.S. requires a speedy trial, and that the Congress of the
U.S. has imposed Statutes of Limitation to prevent long-delayed prosecutions.

I DO NOT SEE HOW THESE DEFENDANTS CAN NOW POSSIBLY OBTAIN
FAIR TRIALS.

Under the circumstances, to permit another trial, conceivably lasting more than a
year, with new prosecutors and newly-appointed counsel for defendants, with che eventual
outcome in serious doubt, as Mr. Rogge has stated to the Court on three occasions, would
be A TRAVESTY ON JUSTICE.

I have no doubt the cases should be dismissed, and an order to that effect will be
entered as to all defendants.

The question of terminating these cases is one of importance. If the dismissal I
shall order is sustained, new prosecutions may not be started, because they will be barred
by the Statute of Limitations.

The Court feels that the prosecution should have opportunity, if so advised, to take
action by way of application to appellate courts to review my order dismissing the cases.
While this seems to me to be possible after final judgments of dismissal, nevertheless,
in order to safeguard the interests of the prosecution against any. doubt, the final order
of dismissal will not be entered by the Court until Dec. 2, 19*46.

The Court should and does acknowledge with gratitude the services of counsel who
served in behalf of the defendants without compensation. Their sacrifices were extensive;
their financial losses were great. Specifically, the Court thanks for their services in these
cases, W. Hobart Little, Frank H. Myers, Elizabeth R. Young, J. Austin Latimer, M.
Edward Buckley, Orville C. Gaudette, P. Bateman Ennis, John S. Hillyard, Ethelbert B.
Frey, Harry A. Grant, James A. Davis, Ben Lindas, Frank J, Kelly, Arthur Carroll,
Charles E. Morganston, Claude Thompson, William Gallagher, Joseph H. Bilbrey, Rees
B. Gillespie. L. J. H. Herwig, John B. Gunion and George B. Fraser.

(Signed)

BOLITHA J. LAWS
Chief Justice

Washington, D. C.

Nov, 22, 1946.

(Emphasis Supplied)

GROSS ABUSE OF COURTS

The following points are from the personally composed and formally
presented appeal to the Washington Court of Appeals which upheld dismissal,
entitled "Brief of Robert Edward Edmondson, Appellee, opposing Appellant’s
Plea Against Dismissal,’’ which brief was highly commended by defense
counsel:

"Why did the prosecution in the mass-case go back twenty-five years in
the third indictment mistrial—as per Bill of Particulars and mistrial transcript—
in search of evidence of criminal intent after Indictment No. 2 was struck
because it violated the ex post facto clause of the Constitution by going back
ten years? In its German-American Bund draft-evasion reversal-decision of
June 11, 1945, the U. S. Supreme Court reprimanded the prosecution for
going back only seven years.

"In view of the revelations herein made exposing the "infirmities-of-proof-
by-imputation” Prosecutor Rogge "secret report," why did the Justice Depart¬
ment even consider offering such an unacceptable document to Chief Justice

4

Laws JSiov. 21, 1946, in support of its request for retrial, since the subject matter
thereof was not only palpably irrelevant to the mass-case charge but was in¬
admissible in court on hearsay grounds?

"Did the Justice Dept, offer such material knowing it to be inadmissible?
Or, could it be so professionally ignorant as not to be able to distinguish
between relevant and irrelevant evidence?

"Affirmative answers to either query would be damning!

"Exemplifying the vengeful, scandalous and libelous smear-technic ap¬
parently inculcated into the legal staff of the Department of Justice, Chief
Prosecutor Rogge, who thrice admitted that he w-as unable to make a case,
viciously attacked defendants’ patriotism publicly in numerous lectures on his
investigations in Nazi-Gc-rmany, delivered under the auspices of Jewish
organizations in cities of states where defendants were resident, including
Pennsylvania, California, Washington, Illinois and Michigan, continuing the
smear-campaign in New York and Massachusetts after the mass-case was
unconditionally dismissed.

"Mr, Rogge’s amazing admission during an invitation-address before the
American Jewish Congress as reported by the Boston Post of Dec. 2, 1946,
disclosing the exceptional high, wholly unimpeachable and unmistakable pro-
American source of patriotic financial donations made to certain impoverished
anti-Communist defendants during mistrial, thereby canceled out and utterly
disproved his own Nazi bribery allegations made Mar. 1, 1946. All of which
unmasks the inherently oppressive character of the Justice Dept, appeal from
the lower court dismissal."

(After O. John Rogge, mass-case prosecutor, was discharged by the
Department of Justice, he was reported in the public press as repeatedly acting
as counsel for notorious pro-Communist elements, and once visited Soviet
Russia "to pay his respects" to Stalin in Moscow.)

Continued quotations from the Edmondson brief follow below:

"Court-appointed Counsel Frey of Washington, D. C, wrote defendant
Edmondson Feb. 21, 1945, reporting mass-case hearings on Feb. 19 before
U. S. District Court Associate Justice T. Alan Goldsborough. He quoted
Justice Goldsborough as stating in open court after hearing oral arguments:
"I don’t know if this trial is going on again or not. If so, IT IS BLOODY
MURDER!" Mr. Frey wrote: "That is exactly what be said." (This writer under¬
stands that Justice Goldsborough was a member of the banc of judges who
wrote later the "mistrial’’ decision in the mass-case.)

"In his 1945 book The March of Bolshevism, Judge Geo. W. Armstrong
of Texas, says the obvious Marxian conspiracy to deprive mass-case defendants
of their Constitutional rights, with the connivance of the Attorney-General’s
Department,' is such a serious abuse of the courts and of governmental power
. . . that Congress should turn the searchlight of publicity on those who have
broughc about this infamous prosecution."

"It is of the essence of liberty that it be recognized that guilt is personal
and cannot be attributed to the holding of opinions or to mere intent in the
absence of overt acts."—Former Chief Justice Hughes of the U. S. Supreme
Court, to New York Assembly members in 1920, regarding expulsion of
Socialists.

In his brief to the U. S. Court of Appeals from which the above quota¬
tions are taken, Defendant Edmondson emphasized the repeated evidence that

5

die Roosevelt Administration's Department of Justice did not go into court
with dean hands; that it acted in bad faith during procedure; that it ignored
U.S. Supreme Court precedent-decisions; that it made exploratory searches as
well as illegal seizures; that it flagrantly failed to uphold the vital Constitu¬
tional decrees of ex post facto and impartial and speedy justice.

"NO JURISDICTION" MOTION TO DISMISS

In consideration of the positive declaration of defense-counsel that the
prosecution in the seditious conspiracy case had even failed to establish the
legal right to try the indictment in Washington, Defendant Edmondson sub¬
mitted to Chief Justice Laws under date of May 20. 194-6, the following
''Motion to Dismiss" the case on the ground that the judiciary, according to U.S.
Supreme Court decisions cited, lacked jurisdiction anywhere to handle this
essentially political case, which was de facto under the exclusive power of
Congress.

"Now comes Ethelbert B. Frey, Actorney for Robert Edward Edmondson,
defendant, says his client is innocent of the charge of conspiring co undermine
the loyalty of' U.S. armed forces, should not be prosecuted further, and hereby
respectfully moves this honorable Court to dismiss all charges against him on
the ground of lack of judicial power jurisdiction in the matter, as established by
decisions of the United States Supreme Court, refusing to consider questions
presented because they were political and not under control of the judicial
power. (AUTHORITY: Questions arising under a republican-form of govern¬
ment are political, not judicial, and are for Congress, not courts. Ohio v, Akron
Metro. Park Dish, 28L U.S. 80, L. ed. 715, 50 S. Ct., 230, 66 ALR 1465.)

"WHEREFORE, since this matter has degenerated into a wholly POLITI¬
CAL set-up, and is therefore beyond the jurisdiction of the Judicial Power,
defendant hereby petitions the Court to forthwith dismiss the three indictments
in furtherance of justice and in the public interest,’’

(Signed May 20, 1946)

While that motion was denied ic will be noted that the accompanying
affidavit (cited hereafter) not only refutes before dismissal, seriatim and
meticulously, principal conspiracy allegations of the Roosevelt prosecution but
unmasks the real conspiracy in this matter, namely, a conspiracy by the
Roosevelt Department of Justice to depiive Edmondson of his substantial rights
as guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution—which policy follows precisely “the
Communist Line” of attempting to conceal its own guilt by accusing adversaries
of crimes the Communists themselves are actually committing.

(Note; Chief Justice Laws of the U. S. District Court of the District of
Columbia, unconditionally dismissed the seditious conspiracy case as a travesty
on justice six months after this Motion To Dismiss by Edmondson May 20,
1946.)

In the record below', to enhance simplicity and accuracy and to clarify,
the accompanying affidavit has been individualized and focused as much as
possible consistent with important facts; diversive irrelevancies being minimized
by concentraton on essentials.

6

REFUTATION BY DOCUMENTATION

Robert Edward Edmondson being duly sworn, hereby deposes and says—

CHARGE by the Roosevelt Administration Justice Department: That in violation of
the so-called 1940 Sedition Law enacted on June 23, Defendant Edmondson conspired_
with others and with members of the German Nazi Party "to undermine the loyalty" ot
the armed forces of the United States through publications issued and distributed by him
in peace-time.

REBUTTAL NO. 1. Whereas, on Dec. 7,. 1944 , following a mis-crial declaration
at Washington, D.C., thirteen defence-counsel promulgated a joint statement saying the
actual charge in the indictment (73086) was that defendants conspired . to advise,
counsel urge and cause insubordination, disloyalty, mutiny and retusal of auty in the
military and naval forces of the U.S.;" the indictment being based on the Act of
Congress of June 28, 1940, Title 18, USCA, Sections 9-11.

"That the prosecution tried but failed to show requisite intent, by the introduction
of irrelevant, immaterial and inaccurate history going back more than 20 years (in
violation of the ex-post facto provision of the U.S. Constitution), m a wholly fume
attempc to prove that defendants joined the Nazi Party Leaders in a movement to destroy
democracy government in the U.S. and other countries.

"That prosecution faiLed to establish venue or jurisdiction in the District of Columbia.

"That the prosecution failed to adduce any evidence tending to prove the specific
charge in the indictment as recited herein. ^, -

"That, in our opinion, defendants are INNOCENT OF ALL CHARGES made m
said indictment."

REBUTTAL NO. 2. By reversing June 11. 1945, the draft-evasion conviction of
ieaders of the German-American Bund, which the mass-trial prosecutor held to be the
"spearhead" of the Nazi movement in the U.S. (although an FBI report of 1937 cleared
it of Nazi seditious activities) the U.S. Supreme Court denounced the offering of a huge
mass of evidence and exhibits similar to that at the 1944 mistrial.

REBUTTAL NO 3. Regarding "requisite intent," the U.S. Supreme Court ruled
Apr 23 1945 in Cramer v. U.S.: "Other evidence relates statements by Cramer before
the U.S’ was at war with Germany. At the time they were uttered, however, they were
not treasonable. To use pre-war expressions of opposition to entering a war to convict
of treason during the war, is a dangerous procedure.

ALLEGATION. That "The Nazi Party and its leaders publicly announced their
program to destroy democracy throughout the world, in speeches, newspapers, pamphlets,
books and other writings.”

REBUTTAL NO. 1. Whereas, the Department of State of the U.S. Govt, in 1943
issued a book entiled "National Socialism” in which on Page 56 the categorical state¬
ment was made: "IT IS IMPOSSIBLE to adduce from the speeches, or writings of Nazi
leaders any direct statements chat they aimed to dominate the world."—

REBUTTAL NO. 2. Since the Report of June 30, 1945, of Chief-of-Staff Gen.
Geo Marshall of the U. S. Army to the Secretary of War, said "No evidence has been
found that the German High Command had any over-all strategy plan adding that_ the
German General Staff could not agree among themselves about invading Great Britain
after the fall of France; never worked with the Italian leaders; did not agree on the
conduct of the Russian campaign; and had no co-ordinated plan with Japan which was
later confirmed by testimony at the Nuremburg War Criminals Trials—how could there
have existed a Nazi-Fascist world-domination plot, as alleged by the prosecution, without
an over-all strategy plan, since conspiracy bottoms on partnership agreement?

ALLEGATION: That defendant organized, controlled and supported organizations
ac home and abroad listed in the indictment.

REBUTTAL; Whereas, Defendant Edmondson did not "organize, control or support"
ANY of the 45 organizations named, and challenges the prosecution to produce any
proof of its allegation.

ALLEGATION: That, defendants worked together up to the time of the filing
of Indictment 73086, filed Jan. 3, 1944.

REBUTTAL: Whereas, Defendant Edmondson completely retired from all publica¬
tion Nov 30 1940 (3V 2 years previously). Witness statement of Asst. Prosecutor

Toseph W Burns in February, 1943. to this defendant in the presence of Attorney
Wa-ner H Parker and defendant's wife, viz.: "We were sorry to learn that you had
stopped publication Nov. 30, 1940, because we hate to lose a defendant."

7

ALLEGATION; That defendants issued propaganda to destroy the American form
of Government.

REBUTTAL: Whereas, in an address Aug. 14, 1940, at Stoddartsville, Penna,,
delivered to Boy Scouts, Defendant Edmondson said: "Usurpers have sought to destroy
our protective system of checks-and-baiances by a communizing process labeled 'democ¬
racy.' In these days of peril we should be more on guard than ever to protect traditional
Americanism from alien labels and foreign ideologies of all kinds. The American Model
is unique and unlike other so-called republics, and it is the best government on- earth.
We should be prepared to defend it against all comers."

The foregoing address—one of many defence-exhibits—was printed under the title
"American Republic Model Best.”

ALLEGATION: That defendant wanted a one-party system like that of the Nazis.

REBUTTAL NO. 1. Whereas, on July 18, 1940, Defendant Edmondson published
a bulletin headed "Commandeer & Compel Labor &c Capital," declaring: "This is a
two-party nation.”

ALLEGATION: That defendant "intended to abolish Freedom of Speech, Freedom
of the Press and Freedom of Assembly.”

REBUTTAL NO. 1. Whereas, Defendant Edmondson on May 12, 1938, published
under the caption "Court Dismissal" statements regarding his publications, saying that
his "patriotic politico-economic exposures were directed without hate, to defend-protect-
preserve the peace and safety of the Constitutional State against irreligious jewish-
Communist subversions thereof . . . Our great Constitutional Form of Government stands
or falls with Freedom of Speech, Press and Assembly.”

REBUTTAL NO. 2. Under the title "Free The Press!." on Mar. 3, 1938, Defend¬
ant Edmondson published: "Our Constitutional Guarantees have been communized and
broken down by the 'terrible power of the purse' operating through the 'great power of
the press.' FREE THE PRESS—and the Constitution is preserved! FREE THE PRESS—
And America is saved! I am for free speech ballots—not communistic bullets. By public
enlightenment, bloodshed can be avoided. Let the people know The Truth! They will act
to Rescue The Republic!”

ALLEGATION: That defendant wanted to run the U.S. as a totalitarian state in
accord with the Nazi Leadership Principle.

REBUTTAL: Whereas, on Oct. 24, 1935, Defendant Edmondson published a
bulletin headed "Why Americanism Rejects Socialism,” in which he stated: "German
Socialism . . . retains the European mass-action ’master-leadership’ principle, which is
un-American . . . The world political struggle today is between the American Ideal of
Individual Liberty and the foreign doctrine of regimentation."

ALLEGATION; Defendant agreed that they should destroy our form of government
and set up a Nazi or Fascist form.

REBUTTAL NO. I, Whereas, Defendant Edmondson published Apr. 23, 1934,

a bulletin captioned "Mis-Representative Minority Government," stating: "Being pro-
American, this writer is ANTI-FASCIST, anti-communist and ANTI-SOCIALIST,
because these forces have been obviously' subverting Americanism; having threatened to
destroy the very foundation of American Liberty . . . This writer , is pro-American under
the Constitution; for Representative Government without selfish minority dictation; for
Individual Liberty without license; for Equality of Opportunity with profit-reward; for
capitalistic economic freedom minus predatory practices.”

REBUTTAL NO. 2 . Whereas, Defendant Edmondson published Feb. 24, 1938,

under "Patriots Halt Internationalists," his lecture on Americanism before the German-
American Bund in N.Y. City following an FBI 1937 investigation-report clearing the
BUND of Nazi subversive activities, in which address was the following:

"Are you a Fascist?"—I am asked.

"The answer is NO.”

"Are you inclined toward Fascism for America?"

"No, the dictatorship regimentation thereof is un-American.”

"Do you favor German Nazism for the U.S.?"

"I do not. It represents regimentation by master-leadership, which is also un-
American.

8

ALLEGATION: Defendant appealed to members of the armed forces to be disloyal
to our democracy form of government.

REBUTTAL: Defendant Edmondson challenges the prosecution to produce ONE
such appeal. His publications were always addressed to the American People under the
constitutional free press guarantee—never addressed to members of U. S. armed forces.

ALLEGATION: Defendant attacked every step our government made to defend
itself.”

REBUTTAL NO. 1. Whereas, Defendant Edmondson wrote May 20, 1940 under
the publication title "High Treason:” "There is no excuse for not making America
invincible to all comers . . - The Hour is Grave! And the time has come to make the
voice of We The People effective in Washington. . . . Rescue The Republic! Make it
Invincible!”

REBUTTAL NO. 2. "Keep America out of the second Jew-^made European War!”
published Defendant Edmondson Sept. 4, 1939, under the title STAY OUT OF THE
SUICIDE WAR!.” in an appeal to the American people calling for "Billions for
defense against invasion but net one drop of American Christian blood for the second
kosher suicide war!”

ALLEGATION: That defendant set race against race by publications to promote the
Nazi racial concept in the U.S.

REBUTTAL: Defendant Edmondson declared Oct. 24, 1935, summing up the Nazi
German racial stand: "COMPOSED OF MANY RACES, America cannot cultivate 'A
RACIAL SOUL' Like Germany"—captioning the article "Why Americanism REJECTS
Socialism.”

ALLEGATION: That defendant "identified himself by the main label of anti¬
communist;" spread propaganda that Communists were trying to take Over the U.S.;
accused many of our public officials of being Communists; labeled everything he opposed
as Communist and Jewish including international bankers and democracy; and preached
hatred of Communism and Jews.

REBUTTAL: Defendant Edmondson admits being anti-Communisc because Com¬
munism is directly against the American constitutional representative republican form of
government.

ALLEGATION: That Defendant Edmondson is "being prosecuted for circulating,
right up to the time of the finding of Indictment 73086 on Jan. 3. 1944, thousands of
documents describing President Roosevelt as a Jew because some of his ancestors were
named Jacob, Sarah and- Samuel—carrying the implication that he got the country into
the war to help fellow-Jews,” and "referring to the President as a warmonger.”

REBUTTAL: NO. 1. Since Defendant Edmondson retired from all publishing
activities Nov. 30, 1940, he could n-ot have been ''circulating 1 ’ said documents "up to
Jan. 3, 1944."

To uncover and explain to his countrymen what he believed to be President
Roosevelt's Jewish anti-Americanism and pro-internationalism, which put Jewish before
American interests, Defendant Edmondson, many years before the Nazis in 1939 referred
to it, reproduced previous publications as below listed which traced the Roosevelt ancestry
to the Rosenvelt-Samuels Family of Holland.

The Daily Citizen of Tucson. Ariz., Published Mar. 7, 1934, a Roosevelt genealogy
made up in the Carnegie Institution of Washington, showing descent from the Rosenvelt-
Samuels Family of Holland.

The St. Petersburg, Fla., Times of Feb. 8, L954, printed an interview with former
Gov. Chase Osborn of Michigan, personal friend of Franklin D. Roosevelt, detailing
Roosevelt's Jewish descent from the same Holland ancestry.

REBUTTAL NO. 2. This defendant believed President Roosevelt was warmonger¬
ing by placing Jewish interests in peace and war before those of The Republic, in view
of the following associations:

"The Social Justice Committee of the Rabbinical Assembly favors the general tendency
of the recently adopted social legislation in particular the scope of the Tennessee Valley
Authority. It endorses the President's plan for reorganization (packing) of the U.S.
Supreme Court.”—From the Jewish National Day of N.Y. City, May 1L, 1937.

9

Challenging che present American social system, the Central Conference of American
Rabbis, largest Sanhedrin in the world, at its 1936 annual convention, declared by resolu¬
tion- ''We advocate a socialization of basic enterprises- There is only one way in which
the American People can escape fascism and Communism, and that is by establishing
A THOROUGHLY SOCIALIZED DEMOCRACY.” (N.Y. Times, Sept. 13, 1936} A
thoroughly socialized democracy is communism.

“The man behind the U.S. Supreme Court repacking process was Samuel I. Rosen-
man, close friend of the President. 1 '—Washington Correspondent Paul Mallon, Feb. 7,
1937.

President Roosevelt appointed Felix Frankfurter to the U.S. Supreme Court Jan.
4, 1939, although he had never administered a judgeship.

A short history of B’nai B'nth in England, written by Paul Goodman, Past
President, says: “In the U.S. the B'nai B’riih Order is the power behind the President.’’—
Free Press of London, July, 1938,

The late Gen. Hugh Johnson, who called President Roosevelt “The Jewish People's
Idol" in the N. Y. World-Telegram of June 19, 1939, wrote in the Philadelphia Inquirer
of June 18, 1940: "There is no longer any question that Mr. Roosevelt is exercising
no effort to’ keep us out of war. It may not be fair to say that it is his purpose to exert
everv effort within his supposedly limned powers to get us into war; but at Least this
statement is incontestible: EVERY ACT OF KIS. IN THE PAST THREE YEARS IS
CONSISTENT WITH SUCH A PURPOSE, AND NO ACT IS INCONSISTENT
THEREWITH. It is shooting craps with the country’s destiny.”

“Unless Bolshevism is nipped in the bud immediately it is bound to spread all over
Europe and che world, as it is organized and worked by Jews."—Netherlands Minister
to Russia reporting to the British Govt, in September. _ 1918.—From U.S. State Dept.
Book 1931. entitled 'Foreign Relations of the U.S., Russia I.” Pages 674-6/9. Library of
Congress.

The 1919 Overman Report to the U. S. Senate contains much evidence that leaders of
the Bolshevist Revoition were largely Jewish.

ALLEGATION: That Defendant Edmondson attacked New Deal public officials,
with intent to undermine the confidence of the American people in them.

REBUTTAL: Defendant Edmondson's “attacks" were exposures of New' Deal anti-
Americanism. delivered under auchority of the First Amendment to the Constitution of
the United States and were in direct response to a Presidential call (Oct. 13, 1933) to
newspapermen for criticism of New Deal policies.

ALLEGATION: That Defendant Edmondson spoke before the German-American
Bund meetings. He spoke at a Bund meeting Oct. 30, 1937, at the N. Y. Hippodrome.

REBUTTAL: Defendant Edmondson challenges the prosecution to produce any
evidence whatever that he spoke at that Hippodrome meeting. He lectured on American¬
ism once before the Bund Feb. 24, 1938, after a 1937 FBI investigation-report had
cleared that organization of Nazi subversive activities.

ALLEGATION: That Defendant Edmondson collaborated with the German-American
Bund, exchanging publications with it.

REBUTTAL; By advice of counsel, Defendant Edmondson never joined nor
collaborated with any group or organization whatever, maintaining an independent
position in his anti-Communist activities. He exchanged publications with many pub¬
lishers, in accord with established custom.

ALLEGATION: Defendant Edmondson worked with James True and Geo. E.
Death erage.

REBUTTAL: Publisher Edmondson exchanged publications with Publishers True
and Deatherage in the customary publishers-exchange relationship. He did not meet either
of them until about a year after he had engaged in his one-man crusade for Americanism.

ALLEGATION: That Defendant Edmondson was in contact with the German
Embassy at Washington.

REBUTTAL: While oublishing from the country hamlet of Stoddartsville, Penna.,
Defendant Edmondson received a Martin Luther pamphlet printed in German. Not under¬
standing German, he sent it to the German Embassy at Washington asking for the
courtesy of translation—which was done. That is the sum total of such contact.

ALLEGATION: That after Pearl Harbor defendant asserted that our Government
deliberately invited the Japanese attack Dec, 7, 1941,

REBUTTAL: Defendant Edmondson retired from all publishing activities Nov,
30, 19^0, more than a year before Pearl Harbor, and consequently could not have
published the assertion indicated,

ALLEGATION: That defendant called Democracy decadent and wanted co destroy
our democracy-form of government,

REBUTTAL NO. 1. just how could defendant conspire to destroy a democracy form
cf government in the U.S. where such a setup does not exist, in view of the following
facts:

(A) The Founders of the U.S. specifically repudiated "democracy," the 'Father of
the Constitution,” James Madison, stating that it was incompatible with personal security
and the right of private property; (B) Since Sc-c. 4 of Art, 4 of their Constitution, which
did not contain the word ''democracy.” by the simple act of guaranteeing to each- state
in the Union a REPUBLICAN-form of government, completely bars a democracy-form;
and (C) The 1928 U.S. Army Citizenship Training Manual seals the anti-democracy
verdict with these words: 'The Government of the United States is NOT a Democracy
BUT A REPUBLIC,”

ALLEGATION: Defendant Edmondson "followed the Nazi Line" in—

Attacking Democracy: Whereas he was guided by the repudiation cf the Democracy-
Form by the Founders of the U.S., whose Constitution bars from the Nation any but a
Republican-Form of government;

In Attacking Public Officials: Whereas, he exposed their New Deal political Social
Democracy ideology as destructive of our Constitutional Representative Republican
System—doing so long before the Nazi attacked U.S. public administrators;

In Attacking President Roosevelt: Whereas, five years before the Nazis attacked
the President as a Tew, this defendant exposed his Jewish Internationalism and his state
socialist domestic policies as diamettically against the interests of The Republic;

In Attacking Communism: Whereas, this defendant was guided in such activity by
the Principles laid down in the book "Communism Unmasked” by Maj. Gen. A. A. Fries.
USA retired, which American Army high official pointed out over a decade ago that
Communism was the worst enemy of The Republic, and that Fascism was merely the
name applied to all and-Communists by Communisis themselves.

In Attacking Jews; Whereas, he directed his attack against Jews who were under¬
mining our form of Government by aggressive and forceful Socialism, Communism and
Sovietism—calling attention to the historic fact that "Anti-Semitism" ("exclusively a
product of European politics" according to the 1910 edition of the Encyclopaedia
Britannica), had been in existence in Germany 30 years pre-Hitler. (See Donald S.
Strong 1941 book "Organized Anti-Semitism in U.S.")

Not only did the prosecution in the mass-case fail to establish venue- in the City
of Washington in the District of Columbia (as indicated in the Not Guilty Joint
Statement" of defence-attorneys), but also JUDICIAL jurisdiction, in view of the over¬
whelming POLITICAL character of this erse which automatically removes it from
consideration by the JUDICIAL POWER into the province of - the LEGISLATIVE—as
witness decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court cited hereafter, refusing to take jurisdiction
in similar cases on the specific ground that they constitutionally come under the control
of Congress.

The essentially political nature of the prosecution’s allegations is obvious in the
indictment, the bill of particulars and the prosecutor's address to rhe 1944 trial jury, as
pointed out below; being replete with political terms, i.e.:

"Forms of Government;" "republican;” "totalitarian str.ee;’’ "Democracy;”
"Party program”; "Nazi movement;" "New Deal Party;" "Socialist;" "Communist;'
"Nazi or Socialist State;’’ "National Socialist Party,” "British Imperialism;” "Presi¬
dential election;” "political campaign;" "Anti-Semitism."

(The political phrase "National SOCIALIST German Workers PARTY" and us
derivatives appears 240 times in the prosecutor's 1944 address to the trial jury; "Demo¬
cracy" 50 times; "Communist" 39: "Anti-Semitic” 35 and "Fascist” 13 times.)

In his long address to the trial jury the prosecutor repeatedly emphasized the point
that "Anti-Semitism” was "the spearhead of the Nazi Party movement;'' therehv bringing
the essential nature of these indictments to a POLITICAL focus on "ANTI-SEMI¬
TISM,” which is not a crime under American Law.

The following citation is from Page 168 of "The Constitution Of The U.S., Its
Sources And Its Application,’’ a 1941-5 hook by Thomas Janies Norton, published by
"The Committee For Constitutional Government," 205 E. 42nd St., New York City.

"In 1912 a taxpayer in Oregon . . , claimed chat the Amendment of 1902 to the
Constitution of Oregon, by which the people reserved to themselves- the right to propose
amendments to the Constitution and to enact or reject at the polls laws or amendments
independent of the legislative assembly, had destroyed the republican-form of' government
which had been guaranteed by the National Constitution.

"The U.S. Supreme Court said that the questions presented HAVE LONG SINCE
BY THIS COURT BEEN DEFINITELY DETERMINED TO BE POLITICAL AND
GOVERNMENT, AND EMBRACED ‘WITHIN THE SCOPE OF THE POWERS CON¬
FERRED UPON CONGRESS, AND NOT THEREFORE WITHIN THE REACH OF
THE JUDICIAL POWER."

Which apparently puts this miscalled sedition cr.se under the sole jurisdiction of
Congress because practically every page of the indictment (except the charging part), the
bill of particulars and chc prosecutor's opening address to the trial jury is OVER¬
WHELMINGLY POLITICAL IN CHARACTER; coming directly under the free speech
authority of the First Amendment to the Constitution.

Subscribed and sworn to before me a Notary Public in and for the County of
Nevada, State of California, oil this 23rd day of April, 1946.

Lynne Kelly

Notary Public

ADDENDA

Below is a perfect example of the attempt by the prosecution to follow the infamous
"Lasswell Thought Parallel" thesis of "guilt by association’' notwithstanding its repeated
denunciation by the U.S. Supreme Court.

(a) The Nazis were anti-Semitic; Defendant Edmondson was anti-Semitic; there¬
fore defendant was Nazi.

(b) The Nazis were ami-Communist; defendant was ami-Communist; hence, de¬
fendant was Nazi.

(c) The Nazis wanted to keep U.S. out of war; defendant wanted to keep U.S. out,
of war; ergo, defendant was Nazi.

(d) The Nazis and Fascists were anti-Roosevelt; defendant was anti-Roosevelt; so
the defendant was Nazi and Fascist.

(e) The Nazis and Fascists were anti-Democracy; defendant was anti-Democracy;
so Defendant was Nazi and fascist, notwithstanding he accepted the dictum of the 1928
U.S. Army Training Manual that "The United States is NOT a Democracy but a
Republic."

WASHINGTON PROSECUTION
SEQUEL TO N. Y. INDICTMENT

The foregoing unmasks a subversive New Deal political conspiracy to
suppress news vital to the peace, dignity and safety of the American people:
for the' mass-prosecution was, as regards your Petitioner, a sequel to a June 11,
1936, New Deal New York City group libel indictment sponsored personally
by Roosevelt advisor Mayor LaGuardia, against Defendant Edmondson, which
action, when defendant in 1938 announced his READINESS FOR TRIAL,
was promptly and unconditionally dismissed on the court’s own motion, as
WITHOUT’WARRANT IN LAW and "in furtherance of justice’’—and in
direct violation of the frc-e speech amendment to the U.S. Constitution, as
ADMITTED in amicus curaie ''backdown" petitions to the Court by the
American Civil Liberties Union, American Jewish Congress et al. New Deal
supporters whose members had previously publicly applauded the mayor s
indictment, for which the latter was given a medal.

SUBVERSION—CORRUPTION—TREASON EXPOSED

The mass of documentation hereinafter submitted, not only in justification
but in the line of further performance of patriotic duty, is of unique character:
and your Petitioner is convinced that the invaluable confession-documents
quoted will effectively aid Congressional investigators in their present task of
unmasking New Deal overt act treason to The Republic, as well as unprece¬
dented politico-economic Corruption.

Identification of the secret forces which have been promoting national
destruction by acts as well as published propaganda, is unerringly indicated by
circumstantial and direct evidence, providing testimony beyond reasonable
doubts.

Verbatim, quotations are provided by the following:

(1) Exhibits in court procedure of twenty-two months in New Deal
New York prosecution and five years in Washington.

(2) Responsible "overt evidence’’ amply supported upholds this writer’s
legal exposures of the undermining of our Republic and traditional
Americanism.

(3) Original .and photostat copies of historic books, pamphlets, docu¬
ments, illustrations, etc., from ail over the world, substantiate accusations re¬
garding origins of Communism, Socialism, Marxism, Liberalism, Bolshevism
and allied national subversions.

(4) There are revealing confessions of guilt by boastful published con¬
fessions from "the horse's mouth," almost unbelieveable, staggering occidental
imagination by their arrogance and sadism,

(5) Edmondson bulletia publications of themselves completely refuting
seditious conspiracy charges of the New Deal prosecutions, are shown to have
been in the possession of Roosevelt Department of Justice lawyers before in¬
dictments were made.

The documentation next following begins with factors leading to the
patriotic non-profit Edmondson Crusade, reported chronologically hereinafter
as nearly as possible.

ROOSEVELT CALL FOR CRITICISM

Publisher Edmondson responded to a call to The Press for criticism, issued
by President Franklin D. Roosevelt, as published in the New York Times of

Oct 14 1933 from which the following is taken:

' "This program (New Deal) is too vast an undertaking for any one man
or set of men to make sure of, I rely on jou newspapermen to check us. I
want your criticism as well as your support.

Following public endorsement of Roosevelt's platform promises your
Petitioner,—a journalist specializing in pol.tico-econom.c :f.elds-answered that
cal! in good faith with an Oct. 24, 1933, signed bulletin headed Wholesale
Reform Blocking Recovery;" pointing out that wholesale reforms were operat¬
ing to prevent business' recovery, listing definite factors, concluding with
"Replace Reform Fears With Recovery Confidence.

Thar constructive criticism publication was sent to the White House and
later broadcast from coast to coast.

Finding no evidence of action along the lines suggested, becoming increas¬
ingly alarmed over repetitionai evidence of communistic penetration into
National administration key-posts, about two months later I wrote and published
on Dec. 27 1933, an "open signed lecter" addressed Mr. President: Do You
Favor This un-Americanism?", from which che following extracts are quoted.

"Washington political communists are boring from within to undermine
the American Government. Communists in Government service, by arrogantly
making a false blanket accusation against all in the capitalist class, have cun¬
ningly counted upon fear to protest. In view of the foregoing and your recent
call to The Press for criticism (of che New Deal) the time has come to ask,
Mr. President, are you in sympathy with such apparent trend toward State
Socialism? If not, why are those who seek to overthrow it allowed to stay
in Government service againsc the interests of American citizens? Such un¬
checked boring shakes the foundations of The Republic. Is a new form of
government to be forced upon Americans by a system of secret covenants
secretly arrived at? Those of us who think for ourselves want to know, Mr.

President."

That "open letter," was mailed to the White House, broadcast throughout
the United States, and received widespread approbation. (It was answered
in 1936 by a New York indictment against the undersigned in direct violation
of the free speech amendment to the U. S. Constitution.)

Dated Mar. 27, 1934, an Edmondson bulletin captioned 'Bankrupt
Leadership" was given nationwide circulation, one patriotic agency mailing
TO 000 copies In it I categorically enumerated Roosevelt administration acts
which were causing confusion and business uncertainty, promoting politico-
economic unsettlement along the "Communistic Line:

"Has a sinister alien economic power secretly gained invisible control of
important political machinery as well as that of the channels of publicity ana
the LLS. monetary system?"

-come of our friends kindly warn that we may be framed for daring to
exercise the Constitutional right of _ free speech—but you might as well be
crucified one way as well as another.

The foregoing "frame warning" was translated into action when I was
uronp-lihcl indicted in New York; and prosecuted in Washington, D. C,

19-12-7, as a seditious -.onspirator.

ORIGINS OF THE EDMONDSON CRUSADE

About April first, 1934, John T. Mills, associated with a prominent
N.Y. Stock Exchange firm; Lewis Gouveneur Morris, descendant of a signer of
the Declaration of Independence; and Clarence M. Chauncey, member of the
Union League Club and of a prominent New York family, actively and
practically working against Communism, communicated with Editor at his
New York publication headquarters, following anti-Communist bulletins. They
wanted to know if I was informed as to who was really behind the sub¬
versions of Communism and Socialism.

I replied '’no.”

"Will you read printed proof as to the internationalists promoting such
anti-national propaganda?"

"Yes," was the answer, and I was given a large supply of old and modern
historical books, pamphlets, and other documents, chiefly from British
patriotic sources,

Those publications were carefully read and verified from New York
Public Library sources in .many cases; and, after intensive study, analysis and
digestion I became fully convinced as to the identity of leadership-forces pro¬
pagandizing and subversively using Communism and Socialism to undermine
our Republic.

To the best of this Petitioner’s recollection he was never harmed personally
by Jew's, and therefore his approach to the Jewish Problem could not have stem¬
med. from personal animus; and it is worthy of note that he had three decades
of previous experience as an independent successful reporter, editor and analyst
in the greatest Jewdsh financial center of the world—New-- York’s Wall St.—
with its vicious cycles of international manipulation of security . markets into
general inflation-booms and depression-busts, due to calculated shirtings of
cash billions, as dictated by the materialistic Gospel of Get.

It was this exceptional experience with its comprehensive knowledge,
continual investment analysis and trained observation, which enabled him
promptly to understand and with unerring accuracy to 1 interpret the concrete
suppressed record presented to him in 1934 by responsible sources as to the
Cause of New Deal political subversions, energized by economic-financial-
monetary monoply of the world’s vast resources.

In his 1913 book, "Jews and Modern Capitalism," Economics Professor
Werner Sombart, graphically epitomized thus: "Capitalism was born from the
money loan; Jews made an art of lending money; they were taught early to
look for their chief happiness in money; thc-y fathomed all the secrets that lay
hid in money. They became Lords of Money—and Lords of the world."

That not only unmasked the Communist Plot to destroy The American
Republic, but the world dominion aim of the ideological people today generally
termed "International Jewry.”

Later, I personally bought, with my own funds, other authentic English
and French documents, which provided added confirmation.

When I reported back to the three patriots named, I was queried:

"Well, whac are we going to do about it?"

"I don’t know what you men are going to do" was the answer, "but I, as
a publicity specialist, intend to start a non-profit patriotic exposure crusade

against Communism and its promoters to defend, protect and preserve our
Constitutional Republic—with an independant editorial platform along the
lines of the following:"

EDMONDSON EDITORIAL PLATFORM

Political, non-partisan, for Americanism First; Anti-Internationalism, and anti-Dictator-
ship, Communistic or Fascistic.

Financial, modestly independent, no entanglements.

Religion: a believer in Christian Principles, not a church member,

Ancestry: Virginia-Maryland pre-Revolution native American, chiefly Scotch descent;
bom Dayton, Ohio, 1872.

Business career; Forty years of journalism as reporter, editor, author, publisher,
investment-economist and public relations counsel.

Ambition and Objective: Restoration of The Republic.

Without ambition except to be of service to my country, I cater to no leadership
complex. Believing that circumstances create and draft true leaders, I am ready ro co¬
operate with any patriotic group not wasting time with effects. I follow no policy that
takes account of fear and compromise. No important issue was ever won by cowardice or
by suppressing truth. I am for free speech ballots, not Communistic bullets. Let the
People know the Truth, they will Save The Republic. "Pitiless publicity is the cure for
Public Evils!’ "

THE FOURTH ESTATE

Jewish power propaganda has accepted, applied and proved Irish Statesman
Edmund Burke’s historic tribute to the great power of the press when, during a
1780 session of the British Parliament, he dramatically turned and, pointing
to the Reporters Gallery, said: "There is an Estate more potent than any! . .

He bore eloquent testimony to the maxim that "Pitiless Publicity is the
cure for Public Evils," as did Voltaire when he epigrammatically exclaimed
"Revolutions are made by the pamphleteer!’’ The logic of events indicates
that Voltaire might have well added "and unmade" to that eulogy of "The
Fourth Estate."

It will be noted by the reader that in his patriotic crusade reporting, upon
encountering documents unauthenticated, such as the so-called "Protocols of
the Learned Elders of Zion," "Benjamin Franklin’s anti-Jewish Prophecy," and
other unauthenticated documents, the author hereof has been careful to treat
them in accord with the basic principles of the Fourth Estate regarding
rumors, gossip, etc., namely, as controversial data lacking confirmation but
justifying a report as circulating news of live public interest. Also ultra-con¬
servatism was exercised in handling documentation from Nazi, Fascistic or
other sources which current propaganda had labeled as "prejudiced anti-Semitic
matter." The whole truth has been assiduously cultivated to the best of this
writer’s ability, and when ascertained, he has presented it as clearly as possible,
in the "language of vigor," logically convinced as to its reliability.

THE DEADLY PARALLEL
(Signed Bulletin of April 7, 1934, issued by Edmondson)
WHICH is more TRULY REPRESENTATIVE of American Institutions?
This Group or This List

Famous practical Americans who, under
Constitutional individual reward system,
helped to build United States prestige and
wealth to unequalled pre-eminence.
(Alphabetical)

ATTERBURY, W. W., President Pennsyl¬
vania. Railroad,

ALDRICH, Winthrop W., Chairman,
Chase National Bank,

BRUERE, Henry, President, Bowery Savings
Bank,

BUCKNER, Thomas A., President, New
York Life Insurance Co.,

Professors, Doctrinaires, et al, prominent
National Administrators and Advisors,
favoring policies antagonistic to American
Traditions.

(Alphabetical)

BARUCH, Bernard M., "Unofficial Presi¬
dent,”

BERLE, Prof, A. A, Ji,, "Unofficial
Advisor,"

BULLITT, W. C., U. S. Ambassador to
Russia,

BRANDEIS, Louis D., "Braintrust God¬
father,"

16

CORTELYOU, Geo. B., President, Con¬
solidated Gas Co.,

DAVIS, John W., Former Democratic
Presidential Candidate,

DAWES, Charles G., Former Republican
Vice-President, United States.

ELY, Jos. B., Democratic Governor of
Massachusetts,

FORD. Henry, Automobile Manufacturer.
GLASS, Carter, Democratic Senator from
Virginia,

GIFFORD. W. S., President, American
Telephone & Telegraph Co„

GRACE, E. G., President, Bethlehem Steel
Corporation,

HARRIMAN, H. I., Chairman U. S. Cham¬
ber of Commerce,

HUGHES. Charles Evans. Chief Justice,
U, S. Supreme Court,

HARBORD, Gen. James G-. Chairman.

Radio Corp. of America,

JORDAN, Dr. Virgil P„ President, Nation¬
al Industrial Conference Board,
KEMMERER, Prof. E. W„ International
Monetary Expert,

LINDBERGH, Col. Charles A„ Famous
American Aviator,

MORGAN, J. P„ Great Republican In¬
dustrial Banker, given clean bill of health
in Democratic Banking Investigation.
MF.LLON, Andrew, Noted Financier, re¬
duced U.S. National Debt from 2 6 to
16 billion while Republican Secretary of
U. S. Treasury,

RITCHIE, Albert C, Governor of Mary¬
land, former Democratic Candidate for
Presidency,

RAND, J. H., Jr.. President, Remington-
Rand,

SMITH, Alfred E., Former Democratic
Candidate for President,

SPRAGUE, O. M. W., Professor. Inter¬
national Monetary System Expert,
SLOAN, A. P„ Jr., President, General
Motors Corp.,

SCHWAB, Charles M., Steelmaster,
TAYLOR, M. C., Chairman, U. S. Steel
Corp.,

TEAGLE, W. C., President, Standard Oil
of N. J.,

VANDERLIP, Frank A„ Financier,
YOUNG, Owen D., Chairman, General
Electric Co.,

WILLARD. Daniel. President. Baltimore
A Ohio Railroad.

WADSWORTH. James W., Independent
Republican Congressman,
WILLIAMSON, F. E., President, New

COHEN, Benjamin, Stock Exchange Regu¬
lation Bill Co-Author,

EZEKIEL, Dr. Mordecai, AAA, "Farm
Regimentation Co-Author,"

F1LENE, E. A.. "Unofficial Advisor,"
FRANKFURTER, Felix, "Unofficial Ad¬
visor," called "Karl Marx Professor,"
FEIS, Herbert, "the brains of the State
Dept.,"

FECHNER, Robert, Forest Army Head.
FRANK, Jerome, AAA General Counsel,
GOLDENWEISER, Dr. Emanuel, Federal
Reserve Research Director,

HILLMAN, Sidney, Labor Advisory Board,
Amal. Clothing Workers’ Union Radical.
HUNT, Henry, RFC, Ex-Socialist Mayor,
KIRSTEIN, Louis R„ RFC Advisor,
KOHN, Robert, PWA Special Advisor,
LUBIN. Isador, Labor Statistics- Director,
LIL1ENTHAL. David R., TVA Counsel,
LANDAU. L. N.. PWA General Solicitor,
LANDIS, Prof. James M., FTC, Co-author
Regulation Bill and Securities Act,
MORGENTHAU, Henry. Sr., "Unofficial
Advisor,"

MARGOLD, Nathan R., Interior Dept,
Solicitor,

MOLEY, Raymond, Prof., "Unofficial
Favorite Advisor," Co-author Regulation
Bill,

ROSENMAN, Samuel, "Unofficial Ad¬
visor," alleged creator of the "Brain
Trust,"

R1CHBERG, Donald NRA Labor counsel,
SACHS, A., NRA Economic Advisor,
SCHNEIDERMAN, Rose, Labor Advisory-
Beard, noted New York Radical,
SWOPE, Gerard, "Unofficial Advisor,”
SOBELOFF, Simon E.. District Attorney-
General,

TAUSSIG, Prof. Albert E., NRA.
TUGWELL, Rex G., Asst. Secy. Agri¬
culture, holds up Russian System as ex¬
ample for America.

UNTERMYER, Samuel, Stock Exchange
Nemesis,

WARBURG, Tames P., "Unofficial Ad¬
visor,"

WOLLMAN, Prof. Leo, Labor Radical,
Neutral Member Labor Strike Board,
WYZANSKI, C. £., Labor Department
Solicitor.

(Many other consultants omitted for
lack of space, including—in addition to
Cabinet Counsellors Wallace, Murgcnthau.
Jr., Perkins, Farl'ey, Ickes—"Advisors"
Gov. Lehman, Basil Manley, Texas Banker
Jesse Jones, H- J- Lasky, Gen. Johnson.

York Central System.

In all National crises. Washington, Lincoln and other great Presidents of the
Republic enlisted America's distinguished practical patriots against enemies at home and

abroad, .

Why does the Roosevelt New Deal control discredit and deprive America ot
representative wisdom in its hour of supreme politico-economic distress?

Political Bankrupt Leadership is the Poison of the People!

The editorial reprinted below was received by Edmondson about April 10,
1934. It was re-published.

U. S. JEWISH F. D. R. BRAINTRUST
(As listed in reprint below from the Brooklyn Jewish Examiner of
October 20, 1933, Editor, Rabbi Gross)

PERHAPS the most pointed contrast between the lot of the Jews in
Germany and the position of their co-religionists in the United Stares is af¬
forded by comparing the Hitlerite- government’s policy of deliberately and
ruthlessly eliminating from every phase of Germany's economic industrial and
cultural life those Jewish men and women of talent who have labored to make
Germany great and resoected, with that of the ROOSEVELT ADMINISTRA¬
TION WHICH HAS SELECTED MORE JEWS TO FILL INFLUENTIAL
POSITIONS THAN ANY PREVIOUS ADMINISTRATION IN AMERI¬

CAN HISTORY.

In dealing with those Jew's actively participating in framing and carrying
out the New Deal legislation it will be simpler ro separate them into three
groups' those who were prominently identified with Roosevelt s fortunes before
be became President: the members of the "brain trust;” and those who by sheer
merit have found themselves drafted into the growing army of men and women
helping the Roosevelt administration, in official or unoificial capacities, to
instill new strength into the nation’s economic life by means of the national

recovery program.

Attention was first drawn to Roosevelt’s close association with Jews long
before he became President. During Mt. Roosevelt’s first gubernatorial cam¬
paign in New York in 1928 he became acquainted with Samuel Rosenman,
then a member of the State Bill Drafting Commission. Impressed with Rosen-
man's ability in gathering campaign material, Mr. Roosevelt appointed Rosen¬
man his personal counsel It was in the course of those relationships that Mr.
Roosevelt came to appreciate Rosenman’s judgment and he soon charged him
with a multiplicity of confidential and responsible tasks. When Roosevelt
elevated Rosenman to the Supreme Court he admitted he was "cutting off my
right arm” That this was not idle flattery is evidenced by the fact that Judge
Rosenman owns a photograph of Assistant Secretary of State Raymond Moley,
which is inscribed "To Sam Rosenman, founder and bead of the Brain Trust.
The inscription aptly summarized Rosenman's service to Roosevelt because the
now famous "brain trust” came into being during Roosevelt’s years as governor.
Even now Judge Rosenman is frequently called to Washington to consult with

the President.

Rosenman was not the only Tewish advisor of Mr. Roosevelt while he was
in Albany Henry Morgenthau. Jr., who served as State Conservation Com¬
missioner, was constantly called in by Governor Roosevelt for advice and help,
and during the Presidential campaign Morgenthau did a great deal in mapping
out the Rooseveitian appeal to the farmers and in drafting the Democratic
party's agricultural plank. After March 4 President Roosevelt turned to Morgen¬
thau as the logical candidate for the chairmanship of the Federal Farm Board,
a position which clothe? him with great authority under the recovery program.
Mr. Morgenthau is also the generalissimo of the co-ordinated farm relief forces
and a member of the Roosevelt super-cabinet.

Another pre-election associate of Mr. Roosevelt was Jesse I. Straus, now
ambassador to France. It was Mr. Straus who led the way in organizing the
business men of the country behind Roosevelt’s candidacy for the Presidency.

BARUCH 'UNOFFICIAL PRESIDENT’

One of the key Roosevelt advisors is Bernard M. Baruch, a power in the
Wilson administration, who first came into the picture as an early Roosevelt
supporter in the pre-convention days, It was Mr, Baruch who recommended
the appointment of his former associates on the War Industries Board, General
Hugh Johnson and George N. Peek, as administrators of the National Recovery
Act and the Farm Relief Act, respectively, When former Assistant Secretary of
State Moley went to London co keep an eye on the World Economic Con¬
ference President Roosevelt called Mr. Baruch into his administration as an
advisor without portfolio. In assuming this position in the absence of Secretary
of Stare Hull and the President from Washington, Mr. Baruch was regarded
as the "unofficial President."

The second group of Jewish ’’New Dealers" is comprised of those who are
members of the so-called "brain-trust/’ the body of youthful and liberal econ¬
omists, technicians and professors upon whose expert counsel and experience
the President has leaned heavily and drawn freely in framing the recovery
projects. The Jewish members of this loosely-knit "kitchen cabinet" are James
Paul Warburg, Herbert Feis, Charles W. Taussig, Emanuel Goldenweiser,
Mordecai Ezekiel, Felix Frankfurter, Nathan Margold, Charles E, Wyzanski, Tr,,
and Henry Morgenthau, Jr. Of the latcc-r we have already spoken.

Professor Frankfurter, who has declined a number of important positions
in the Roosevelt administration, has nevertheless had his recommendations
accepted in filling nearly half a dozen of the most important legal posts in
the government and continues to function as one of the President's most
trustworthy advisors and a link between thq liberalism of the Brandeis-La
Follette era and the new Roosevelt liberalism. Two of his proteges are members
of the "brain trust,” Nathan Margold, solicitor for the Department of the
Interior, and Charles Wyzanski, Jr., solicitor to the Department of Labor.

The remaining three members of the "brain trust" are veterans in the
government service whose records of achievement led President Roosevelt to
include them in his personal entourage. The best known of this trio is Dr.
Emanuel Goldenweiser, whose official title is director of the division of re¬
search and statistics of the-Federal Reserve System.

Dr. Mordecai Ezekiel’s highly specialized talents in various technical
phases of agriculture have made him an invaluable member of the Roosevekian
inner circles which look to him for guidance in the development of practical
methods of economic restabilization of farming, a major problem in the
recovery program. Dr. Herbert Feis, referred to as "'the brains of the State
Department" by the Washington newspaper corps, is the diplomatic expert of
the "brain trust."

The last group of Jews holding important positions under the Roosevelt
administration is the largest and includes a number of well-known figures as
well as some who are newcomers on the national scene. In the latter category
are Robert Straus, personal assisant to General Johnson; Lloyd H. Landau, a
St. Louis disciple of Professor Frankfurter, who is the general solicitor of the
Public Works Board; Dr. Maurice Karp, dc-an of the Jewish School of Social
Work, to whom has been assigned the task of training che personnel needed
to carry out the National Recovery Act; Dr, Alexander Sachs, chief of General
Johnson's research division and the man to whom the recovery administration
turns for facts on the various codes; Robert Kohn, former president of rhe

American Institute of Architects, who is special advisor to the Cabinet Advisory
Board of the Public Works Administration and in complete charge of plans and
projects submitted for loans under the Public Works Act; Isador Lubin, former
professor at the Brookings Institute in Washington, who heads the vitally
important Bureau of Labor Statistics in the Department of Labor; David E.
Lilienthal, former member of the Wisconsin Public Service Commission, who
is a member of and counsel to the Tennessee Valley Authority for the develop¬
ment of the Muscle Shoals program; Jerome Frank, counsel for the administra¬
tion of the agricultural relief bill, and Celeste Jedel, chief archivist of the
American delegation to the World Economic Conference.

More prominent Jewish personalities are to be found on the various
Industrial Recovery Boards. Sidney Hillman, president of the Amalgamated
Clothing Workers' Union, and a veteran trade unionist and labor economist;
Rose Schneiderman, founder and president of the Women's Trade Union
League, and Dr; Leo Wolman, professor of economics at Columbia University,
are members of the Labor Advisory Board, of which Dr. Wolman is chairman.
Louis Kirstein, Boston merchant and philanthropist, and Gerard Swope, presi¬
dent of the General Electric Company, sit on the Industrial Advisory Board.

(COPIES 1c EACH at Edmondson Economic Service, 80 Washington St., N. Y. City.
DELIVERED POSTPAID by Sealed Mail, 3 copies for 6c; 6 for 12c; 10 for 20c; 15 for
30c. Above 15 copies to 100, lc each plus 15c prepaid express. 500 for $5.50, express
prepaid. Payable in "small" stamps, coins, dollar bills, checks or money orders.)

AMERICANISM DEFINED

Invited by "The Booster Club” of New York City about the middle of
April to deliver before it an address on "Americanism," Editor Edmondson
under date of April 24, 1034, spoke in part as follows:

"It is customary for speakers and writers to get auditors or readers into a
good humor to make them receptive or to 'put something over,’ but I have no
ax to grind except an American-Tomahawk, which is kept razor-edge in these
perilous days. Good humor has no place in the grim job ahead of us. I w r ould
like to make all pro-Americans fighting-mad—and they will be once they
realize individually that sinister minority interests, seeking to control, have
brought them face to face with politico-economic death.

"As this address is On Americanism’ it is apropos to outline my concep¬
tion thereof. I am for Americanism under the Constitution; for representative
Government without selfish minority dictation; for Individual Liberty without
license; for Equality of Opportunity, without predatory practices. Being pro-
American, I am anti-Fascist, Anti-Communist and Anti-Socialist because they
undermine Americanism.

" We ain't seen nothin’ yet' (to use the words of Gen. Hugh Johnson) if
the Roosevelt trend to the 'Left' can't be stopped soon.

"Americans want no Communism! They need no Fascism! They desire no
class warfare! They demand honest representative American government, ad¬
ministered by honorable Americans acting as their servants, public officials who
will not be led astray by irresponsible, corrupt and selfish minorities. If we do
not fight now, there may be nothing left to fight with or for.”

That speech was broadcast throughout the Nation.

MIS-REPRESENTATIVE MINORITY GOVERNMENT
(Edmondson Bulletin dated April 23, 1934)

To Mr, David A, Brown, President-Publisher, The American Hebrew, 212
Fifth Avenue, City:

Sir: Replying to yours of April 17: You say—as if such things were
sacrilege: "On the face of it, these two documents ('Bankrupt Leadership’ and
'The Deadly Parallel’ issued by Edmondson Service) are an attack on the
Roosevelt Administration * * * The Nazi jew-baiting, Jew-hating groups in
this country evidently see in this, definitely anti-Semitic propaganda furnished
by one who purports to be an editor, an investment-economist, and designates
himself to be absolutely independent * * :!! Just a casual analysis of these
two lists proves beyond any question of doubt that whoever got them up
deliberately and maliciously attempted to mislead the public, and to create the
impression that Jews are in the majority of those whom you label: Bankrupt
Leadership,’ thereby attempting to poison the minds of the public * * * The
circular '* * * is an offensive attack upon the Administration and implies that
the government is in control of those who would set up a communistic form of
government, the main purpose of which is to attack rhe Stock Exchange bill
* * * Aside from the fact that you have been guilty of a dis-service to the
Roosevelt Administration, and, by innuendo, been guilty of a rank injustice to
the Jews of this country, you have played into the hands of the Nazi and have
made the very worst use of a service which is supposed to be an ’interpretation
of events in finance-business-investment-speculation’ * * * We should be in¬
terested in knowing if you deliberately and with malice aforethought, sent out
these destructive pieces of propaganda; and if it is with your approval that the
Nazis in America are making use of this propaganda in their own interest.’’

First: This writer is pro-American, under the Constitution; for represent¬
ative government, without selfish minority dictation; for individual liberty,
without license; for equality of opportunity, with profit-reward; for capitalistic
economic freedom, minus predatory practices.

Being pro-American, this writer is anti-Fascist, anti-Communist and anti-
Socialist, because these forces have been obviously subverting Americanism; and
having threatened to destroy the very foundations of American Liberty, such
minority elements face the righteous wrath of an outraged people.

Neither the writer nor his organization has been anti-Jewish, anti-Nazi.
anti-Russian, anti-Irish or anti-German—and will not be so unless such minority
elements speak or act anti-America. We want Americanism for the U. S.

Second, specifically replying: "Bankrupt Leadership" and "The Deadly
Parallel" were written by this writer. They were intended as an "attack on the
Roosevelt Administration." If that be treason to America, the majority and not
a minority will "make the most of it." Minorities in this country seem unable to
realize that Americans regard their officials as servants, not masters; holding
deserved criticism of public policies a duty as well as a Constitutional right. In
their minds, no aura of omnipotence hangs over Washington.

Third: If a pro-American veteran investment-economist, with an unim¬
peachable 30-year record of impartial service, cannot, from an independent
American standpoint, analyze politico-economic developments for his clientele
without being branded a ’Jew-baiter" by an apparently representative source
like yourself, then free speech, as well as representative govemmnt, has been
prostituted to zero, and the present 50 per cent "free" press will continue its
commercialized funeral march,

Fourth: Certainly, with the gigantic job of American reconstruction de¬
manding its exclusive attention, Americanism, forced to fight for self-preser¬
vation against irresponsible and selfish minorities actively conspiring for its
downfall, manifestly cannot jeopardize its existence by dulling the edge of us
defensive weapons out of consideration for quarreling bystanders.

Are you blind to the growing procession in the American daily press of
prominent American men and women caustically denouncing the Roosevelt
New Deal as socialistic, communistic, and un-Amencan. Do you know that this
writer editorially supported Mr. Roosevelt 100 per cent m the public press and
privately until the President called for criticism last Fall.

Do you realize that instantaneous demand for reprinting and re-circulation
bv the tens of thousands, of "Bankrupt Leadership" and "The Deadly Parallel
with coast to coast patriotic commendation and no discordant recorded note
except your own, obviously means that militant Americanism stdl lives.

Apparently some of the oppressed people who hopefully came to American
shores Muring the last half-century, made welcome by American freedom,
tolerance and generosity, have not yet contacted the militant Spirit of America—
or they might prefer to play with explosives rather than with the dynamic
patriotic forces now surging toward^ concert pitch throughout the nation on
account of subversive minority activities.

You further say: "The Deadly Parallel," whether so intended or not, gives
color to the claim'of the Nazi anti-Semitic group in this country that the
President is surrounded by Jews and that the New Deal is supposedly a Jew
Deal.” * * *

By the last phrase of your sentence above—you round out, clarify and bring
this whole matter to an issue, in view of the following:

When pro-Americans have continually and offensively thrust upon their
consciousness the unfair over-representation of Jews in the national braintrust
advisory council: see the great number of Jewish names in Washington ad¬
ministrative bureaus; and read in the Brooklyn Jewish Examiner of Oct 20,
1933 a boastful reference to Bernard M. Baruch as Lnofficial President,
and to Herbert Feis as "the brains of the State Department is it surprising
that the average citizen begins to ask if the five million Jewish minority is
dominant in the national personal government, with 120 000 000 other people
"forgotten” and also, whether their "Moses" has not futileiy led the nation
long enough in a barren wilderness of trial and error.

As an illuminating geographical example of apparent "minority control,"
the so-called Roosevelt "brain-truscV personnel seems to largely over-represent
New York, in comparison with the West and South, according to press directory
an d other listings giving the following prominently-mentioned official and
unofficial "advisors" as being from that State:

Bernard M. Baruch, Prof. Adolf A Berle, Jr, Judge Benj. Nathan
Cardozo, Nathan M. Margold, Jerome Frank, Jesse I. Straus, Sidney Hillman
Robert Kohn, Isador Lubin, Henry Morgenthau, Sr, and Jr Prof, Raymond
Moley, Prosecutor Ferdinand Pecora, Samuel Rosenman, Alex Sachs, Rose
Schneiderman, Prof, Rex G. Tugxcell, Samuel Untermyer, Ptof Leo dolman,
Prof G F Warren Gov. Herbert Lehman, Robert Straus, Frances Perkins,
Beni'. Cohen, Gerard Swope and others less prominent. Conspicuous Mass¬
achusetts "braintrusters" listed include Prof. James M. _ Landis, Edward A.
I'ilene, Prof. Felix Frankfurter and Prof. Frank W. Taussig.

Now, as a practical demonstration of a Fair Deal, contrasted with a Raw
Deal, since you yourself have crystallized the issue to a focus, I am laying this
communication before the same clientele who received “Bankrupt Leadership’’
and “The Deadly Parallel,’’ so that the record may be complete, for their in¬
formation, consideration and verdict—with the following answer to your
closing query, which characteristically puts race above country: Obviously,
petty malice has no place in a life and death struggle to save American Con¬
stitutional Liberty.

“A CLEAN BILL OF HEALTH

In the interest of continuity, documentary data in connection with “Opera¬
tion David A. Brown" is submitted below out of chronological order:

On May 8, 1934, I received another letter from Mr, Brown saying in part:
“It is the opinion of myself and my associates that your writings would bear
investigation, and we are sending literature to the Department of Justice, so
that they may scrutinize it in detail."

Upon which Editor Edmondson in response, publicly commented: "That
is O.K. If the time shall come when an American patriot is jailed for preaching
Americanism, then he would rather be inside than out among 'free’ slaves,”

Inspectors of the Department of Justice called later and finding that the
Editor was exercising his Constitutional rights of Free Speech, did not in any
way censure his activities.

Under date of May 10, 1934, an additional letter was received from Mr.
Brown, reading in part:

* "You may be interested in knowing that 1 have a complete file on you. This
file tells in substance your newspaper and financial history, and not only
GIVES YOU A CLEAN BILL OF HEALTH, but shows that there is nothing
in your previous history to match the poisonous documents (on Jewish anti-
Americanism) that you have sent out."

EDMONDSON-BROWN CONFERENCE

In the latter half of May Mr. Brown telephoned Edmondson asking if
he was agreeable to a conference. A conference was arranged for Mav 24, 193-1.
at Horn's Restaurant in lower N. Y. City; Brown being accompanied by
the American Hebrew's Managing Editor, and Edmondson by John T. Mills,
hereinbefore mentioned. A shorthand memorandum made by Edmondson at the
time contains the following:

Mr, Brown said: “The Jew is a capitalist. Why would he support
Communism?"

“If the long distance objective of the Jews, as 'Chosen People,’ is ulti¬
mate world control, he would use Communism as a means to an end, 1 ' was
the answer.

_ ’'Pooh! Pooh!" ejaculated Mr. Brown. He denied that there was “a
Jewish minority;” but was stumped when Mr. Edmondson pointed out chat
Jews wouldn't "melt;" he having just spoken of "Jewish solidarity."

"I have lived in all parts of this country," remarked Mr. E. Interrupting,
Mr. Brown said: "I know it—and your record is as dean as a hound's tooth.”

Mr, E. went on to say that the tide was rising against Roosevelt Leadership
and the hidden Jewish Radical element.

"Pooh! Pooh!" was again the non-answer.

The Brooklyn Jewish Examiner eaitorial of Oct. 20, 1935. was then
produced—-and Mr. Brown exploded. It was like a red rag to a bull. He said
the paper was going to be "wiped out"—inferential!}- by the Jews them¬
selves. He added "It was all wrong!"

"What do yon want us Jew's to do—get out of Washington?"

"IT WOULD BE A GOOD THING!" I remarked. But he waved that
aside and commented that "after all, the heads of the government is the place
to hit."

"That’s why I’ve been attacking and centering on Roosevelt Bankrupt
Leadership," was the reply,

Mr. Brown admitted: "Roosevelt is responsible, the government will stand
or fall with him."

He then strongly advised me not to "get tangled up with the Nazis, who
are using your publications."

"If I get out hot stuff and they use it, how can I help it?", I asked.

Finally, Mr, Brown solemnly warned: "WE ARE GOING TO BRING
A WAR ON GERMANY!”

World War Two on Germany started five years later in 1939-

THE REAL ISSUE

(Edmondson Broadcast Bulletin of May 11, 1934)

The following correspondence is published as a clarification.

Letter of May 6, 1934, from Louis A. Freedman, 33 Riverside Drive,
N. Y, City to Robert Edward Edmondson:

"The implications of anti-Semitism in your correspondence with Mr. David
A. Brown and the open summons in the pamphlet mentioned to a campaign
against the Jews, show that you are beginning to inject an issue which is in
flat contradiction to your professed Americanism. You insist, properly, that
our Constitution be respected by the government, and yet you are calling on
everybody to violate one of its most important protective clauses as regards
human rights—that forbidding race discrimination.

"Into the American melting-pot have been thrown many races, who have
all been equally welcomed, and to whom the same rights and opportunities have
been accorded. Members of every race have abused these privileges. The Irish
have played a most unsavory role in corruption in municipal and state politics,
but shall a pogrom be launched to exterminate the Irish because so many who
have attained office have been criminal grafters? Bootleggers, forgers and
gorillas have come plentifully from among the Italians. Are the millions of
Italian citizens to be dumped into the ocean? Shall we sweep the country clean
of them all, good, bad and indifferent?

"Killing off 5,000,000 Jews because several dozen of them are in Washing¬
ton in key positions, where, incidentally, they have been placed by the elected
representatives of the American people, may seem to those who are inspired by
the noble’ German experiment, to be an expeditious way of getting rid of all
America's troubles; but let these apostles of a new kind of New Deal not call
this an act of pro-Americanism. Why, however, stop them? If wholesale
massacre is the way to restore the American Constitution and give us back the

country of George Washington, Thomas Jefferson and Abraham Lincoln, let
such American patriots' revive the Ku-Klux Ki-an in all its pristine glory, ride
through the countryside in white sheets and kill and bum Negroes. Catholics,
non-Aryans and any and all races, tribes, creatures which pollute this pure soil!

"So, at bottom, your campaign would seem to be merely an American
mask to hide a hideous, anti-Semitic face, and this calling of Americans to
awake an echo of Hitler's call to Germany to Na 2 ify itself.

"If, however, you are a real American of the true and best American tradi¬
tion, you will not convert vour campaign into one of preaching race-hatred,
and incidentally raking up old lies, which you know are lies, only for the sake
of making the mob-hatred even more venomous. To be true to the Americanism
you profess, make it a dean fight against the government octopus that is
sucking up our liberties and our Constitutional rights; but if you degrade it
to a fight against the Jews, it is you who will appear as the emissary of the
true enemy—Germany."

NOT A HATE CRUSADE

Reply thereto by Edmondson as below, under date of May 11, 1934;

My campaign is for Americanism, and not against minorities who put
country above race or association, whoever they may be. It so happens that, in
my opinion—which obviously agrees with your own—there is a Jewish minority
in key positions at Washington.

My American politico-economic philosophy comprises no futile race¬
hatred or anti-Jew persecutions. This writer has raked up no lies, old or new.
He has merely dramatized the record.

My signed articles are based on records such as that of the Brooklyn
Jewish Examiner article of October 20. 1933—now supplemented by your own
admission that there are Jews in "Washington key positions," who, with others,
must therefore form your "government octopus that is sucking up our liberties.”
Why befog the issue by pointing out the political "octopus,’’ and then refusing
to admit or expose its Jewish minority makeup?

You properly point out that Washington key position jews were "placed
by elected representatives of the people"—Roosevelt Leadership. My criticisms
have been unceasingly aimed at such leadership to hold it to strict account.

The writer is earnestly directing whatever ability he may possess to pre¬
vent, not promote, the reported violence you fear. He sincerely believes that if
the United States Jewish minority will do its American duty it will achieve its
own salvation by putting country first.

Guided by many years’ experience in the independent journalistic field, this
writer is convinced that America’s First Line of Defence—the Constitutionally
guaranteed free press—is being subverted politically through Legislative, ad¬
ministrative and propaganda acts made possible by Washington minority over-
representation, supplemented by economic reprisals through advertising chan¬
nels. Such an outrageous condition prevents the American majority from learning
the truth about policies undermining American institutions.

Arguing that other minorities have abused American privileges, you say:
"Into the American melting-pot have been thrown many races,” including the
Jews. But the record, as I read it, is that the jews do not "melt;" and they seem
unable as a class to think, during crises, in terms of America First, but only-
in terms of “international race consciousness.”

In defence of Americanism, this writer would take exactly the same
position as herein outlined, were the present Jewish influence exercised by the
German group minority, the Irish minority, the Russian minority or any racial,
religious or other minority group in the United States. Any minority element
seeking to rule the American majority will fail. There is no clause in the
Constitution "forbidding race discrimination," except as to the ballot.

YOUR concern is for the 5,000,000 Jews in the United States—MIKE is
for 125,000,000 citizens, including the Jewish minority. Which is TRUE
Americanism?

Below is a signed Edmondson publication of July 4, L934.

FRANKFURTER—THE SPEARHEAD OF THE "BRAINTRUST”

The soaring ambition oi' Prof Felix Frankfurter of Harvard University
is evidently responsible for the persistent report that he is to be appointed to
the U.' S. Supreme Court—which would then, with three Jewish Justices, be
33-1/3 c /c Jewish, whereas the entire United States Jewish minoriev is but 4%
of the total population.

Does the record of this alien-born radical qualify him?

Born in Vienna, Austria, in 1882; admitted to the American Bar in 1905;
made Assistant to Secretary of War Baker; appointed Counsel to Presidenr
Wilson’s Mooney Mediation Commission; nominated in 1932 for the Mas¬
sachusetts Supreme Court but defeated by 500,000 protesting petitioners—
Frankfurter has never been elected to any important political office, gaining
access to inner Government circles by appointive influence.

Listed by the Industrial Defence Assn, of Boston as having been associated
with seven subversive organizations, for more than thirty years devoting his
talents largely to defending notorious Radicals and Communists, the ‘ Red ’
murderers Sacco and Vanzetti and a criminal organization like the I. W. W.—
has not Frankfurter, by such environment, acquired a "cultural background"
diametrically opposed to the traditions of the American Judiciary?

He is named as a member of the National Committee of the American
Civil Liberties Union, which is graphically described thus in House of Repre¬
sentatives Record Report 2290 of January 17, 1931:

"The American Civil Liberties Union is closely affiliated with the Com¬
munist movement in the U.S., and fully ninety per cent of its efforts are on
behalf of Communists who have come in conflict with the law * * * It is quite
apparent that the main function of the ACLU is to attempt to protect Com¬
munists in their advocacy of force and violence to overthrow the United States
Government.”

President Wilson appointed a "Mediation Commission” to bring about the
release of Communist "Tom Mooney,” -who was sentenced to imprisonment in
California for bombing a 1916 Preparedness Day parade, killing 10 and in¬
juring 50 persons. Frankfurter was appointed Counsel of the Commission, and
tried to enlist the influence of former President Theodore Roosevelt to aid
Mooney. The ex-president scathingly rebuked Frankfurter in a Iecter of Dec.
19, 1917, as follows:

"Thank you for your frank letter. I answer it at length because you have
taken and are taking * * * an attitude which seems to me to be fundamentally
that of Trotsky and the other Bolsheviki leaders in Russia; an attitude which
may be fraught with mischief to this country * * *

"I have just received your report- on the Bisbee deportation * * * You:
report is as thoroughly a misleading document as could be written on the
subject. No official writing on behalf of the President is to be excused for
failure to know and clearly set forth that the I.W.W. is a criminal organization

"Here again you are engaged in excusing men precisely like the Bolshevik
in Russia, who arc murderers and encouragers of murder, who are traitors tc
their allies, to democracy and to civilization, as well as to the United States
and whose acts are nevertheless apologized for on grounds, my dear Mi-
Frankfurter, substantially like those which you allege."

"MORE THAN ANY OTHER ONE PERSON FRANKFURTER IS
THE LEGAL MASTER-MIND OF THE NEW DEAL," say Simon anci
Schuster in their 1934 edition of "The New Dealers," adding: "Franklin D.
Roosevelt has been heard 10 say that the only man in the world who can give
him mental indigestion is Frankfurter. His intimacy with him dates back tc
the Wilson Administration.

"When Wallace and Tugwell planned their new farm administration,
they asked Frankfurter to recommend a solicitor for the Department of Agri¬
culture. He suggested Jerome N. Frank. When the first draft of the Securities
Bill was practically wrecked, Moley sent for Frankfurter to rewrite it. Felix
brought down Prof. Landis and Ben Cohen. When the TVA was organized
and needed a smart lawyer. Frankfurter produced David Lilienthai. For Miss
Perkins he produced Charles E. Wyzanski, Jr., and Secretary Hull found wait¬
ing for him in the State Department another Frankfurter economic protege in
the shape of Herbert Feis. Thus are Frankfurter men established in key posts
throughout the Administration"—estimated to total hundreds, most of them
from Jewish-Radical circles.

Endowed with a tremendous intellectual vitality, a prodigious memory, a
legal mastermind and the tact and ability to teach Presidents, can there be any
doubt about Prof. Frankfurter's brilliant and commanding mental power to
inculcate, with appallingly subversive effect, the poisonous germs of fatal
fallacies and false doctrines in the credulous and open mind of American
Youth, coming leaders of the nation?

Apparently High Priest of the misrepresentative Jewish-Radical national
political-minority leadership that has been undermining the American System
of Government and its Free Press. Guardian, by Machiavellian legal artifice, mis¬
leading propaganda and economic subversion, WOULD IT NOT BE TREA¬
SONABLY NEGLIGENT AND PERFECTLY SUICIDAL, IN VIEW OF
THE FOREGOING DAMNING FACTUAL RECORD, FOR AMERICANS
TO PERMIT THIS ALIEN-BORN AND ALIEN-MINDED JEW COM¬
MONLY CALLED "COMMUNIST KARL MARX PROFESSOR," TO BE
ELEVATED TO THE U. S. SUPREME COURT. THE CUSTODIAN OF
THE CONSTITUTION AND BULWARK OF AMERICAN LIBERTIES—
THEREBY INDIRECTLY ENDOWING A FOREIGN BOLSHEVISTIC
FOE WITH SUPERLATIVE AUTHORITY TO COMPLETE OUR DES¬
TRUCTION?

"THE COMMUNISTIC JEW DEAL"

As Seen by

Congressman Louis T. McFadden of Pennsylvania
(Signed Edmondson broadcast Nov. 1, 1934)

Kept from the American people by the sinister Jewish Communistic power
that controls our press, lie buried in the 1933-4 Congressional Record im¬
portant knowledge vital to the destinies of the U.S. It is in speeches as per
extracts below' of a courageous sterling patriot who is master of the Jewish

2 7

Question Chairman of the House Banking Committee, one of the few Repre¬
sentatives endorsed by both Republican and Democratic constituencies—Con¬
gressman Louis T. McFadden of Pennsylvania.

''There has not been an administration since our advent into the great
World War in which Bernard M. Baruch has not been a chief political, econ¬
omic and financial advisor, and every administration that has listened to him

has carried us deeper and deeper into financial chaos..

"When Treasury-Secretary Morgenthau obtains his 'kitty' (this is what I
am told he called the proposed two billion stabilization fund), American
funds will be fed to Europe more expeditiously and with less secrecy.

"Henry Morgentbau is related by marriage to Herbert Lehman, Jewish
governor of New York; and by marriage or otherwise to the Seligmans of the
International Jewish banking firm of J. & W. Seligman. It is not by accident
is it, that a representative and a relative of the money Jews of Wall St. and
foreign, parts has been elevated?"

"Is it not true that in the United States today the Gentiles have the slips
of paper’ while the Jews have the gold and lawful money? _ _

"This 'kitty' bill makes of Henry Morgenthau a central bank, an institution
which Jefferson declared is one of deadly hostility to the free institutions of
the U. S. It slides into his hands the emergency powers which Congress granted

to the President." . . „, rrx . T ,

"Congressman Dickstein said in a radio address in Chicago over vvtNK on
March 18, 193-4: 'We Americans must change our law to make it possible for
them (German Communistic Jews) to come here at once.’

"There is not a man within the sound of my voice who does not know
that this country has fallen into the hands of the international money changers.

Why should the fact be hidden?" , . .

"An attempt to establish a politico-economic plan is now m operation in
England It is designated 'Freedom and Planning.’ May I suggest the similarity
of the scheme to the NRA, Bankhead cotton bill, control of harm acreage, and
Other developments of the New Deal? It is the Jewish Plan of a world state." _
Editor Edmondson was summoned to appear before the House un-Amen-
can Activities Committee, to answer questions by Congressman Samuel Dick¬
stein of New York, but on the day prior to that set for examination he was

notified chat his testimony vas not desired.

Having prepared politico-economic points for exhaustive questioning, and
feeling that .such important testimony should not be w-asted, on Oct. IS, 1934,
he signed and broadcasc the following "questionnaire testimony.’

THE DICKSTEIN FARCE

What is your business? .

Writing analytical investment interpretation ot the general trend of politico-economic

You issued an "Invisible Government" bulletin recently, giving a list of Jewish-
Radicats” surrounding Mr. Roosevelt. What is your conception of "Radical? j .

One who by speech, action or association is connected with Communists. Boisnevists.
Red Socialists or Revolutionaries. In that sense, everyone named in said Invisible Govern¬
ment" chart is a radical, including Mr. Roosevelt. .

What do you understand by the term "Un-American Activity?

Any man or group, such as Jewish Communists, speaking or acting against American
constitutional majority representative principles, or who may be associated witn those

who do, is un-American, in my opinion. .

You have stated that Jewish Leadership has been un-American Give example
The Jewish boycott against Germany imposing great financial loss on the L. b.

Do you not believe that "Hitler atrocities" justify such a boycoct? ,

I do not accept at face value or credit, such information from publicity cnanne.S,
since they are Jewish-dominated, in my opinion.

Can you give further illustrations of Jewish un-Amencamsm?

28

Subversion of American press, radio and screen through ownership, advertising
influence or misleading propaganda; Jewish New Dealer communistic laws and ad¬
ministration in NRA and aA. 4 ; Jewish promotion or Communistic New York meetings
and parades, predominantly Jewish; disfranchisement of New York 80 per cent Gentile
population by Jewish monopoly of ail important gubernatorial candidates.

Futhermoie, I beiieve this Committee itself to be un-American because it has ap¬
parently exceeded and farcically prostituted its authority from being a Committee or
Investigation to pro-Jewish Minority sub-Committees of Inquisition and Espionage ut
Americans doing patriotic duty—practically ignoring manifest communistic subversions.

In my opinion. Mr. Roosevelt is un-American because he has given aid and comfort
ro enemies of representative American government by permitting minority usurpation
at Washington.

Are you not subverting constitutional guarantees by being anti-jewish, considering
-lie religious freedom provision.'

No. This is a plain politico-economic issue, not a religious matter. The Constitution
does not forbid citizens to defend it and their liberties againsc enemes within the state
who are apparently trying to merthrmv i; under cover of religion. By thus prostituting
religion for materialistic ends. Jewish leadership puts itself outside the Constitution.

What is your solution of the Jewish Problem?

Unless the Jewish minority voluntarily repudiates us anti-American radical leader¬
ship and puts Americanism first, 5 believe the American majority should "vote and buy
Gentile;" limit Tews to their population percentage in public affairs: force them to
relinquish domination of U. S. economic life; and eliminate their influence from publicity
channels.

My conception of fairness in connection with the jews is to demand from as well as
to give to them a fair deal on the ground that justice must be mutual to be righteous.
Jewish Jurisprudence and American jurisprudence. Jewish Economics and American
Economics, being respectively Oriental and Occidental, are antagonistic, and will not mix
anv more than East will melt into West. Such an invasion of American law during the
past three decades under the flood of alien immigration, makes it almost impossible for
patriotic citizens to get justice from pro-Jew channels, let alone a Fair Deal.

Do you favor having Gentiles get rid of the Jewish people in the United States by
killing them?

No more than I do the slaughtering of 20,000,000 Gentiles in Russia.

The preservation of priceless American Constitutional liberties is worth any sacrifice.

Correspondence extracts below between James P. Warburg, New York Jew, of the
well-known Warburg International Banking Family, and Robert Edward Edmondson, are
among the most important and enlightening Jewish Problem data published by him.

WARBURG "ENDORSEMENT”

Dear Mr. Edmondson; New York, December 4 . 193-A

There has been brought to my attention a circular letter which you mailed to your
subscribers on Oct. 9, in which you make certain statements about my father, the late
Paul M. Warburg.

It is not the purpose of this letter to take issue with your general statements con¬
cerning Jews, not to attempt to dissuade you from what is apparently a deep-rooted
prejudice. I am concerned here only with the statements you have made about my father,
because they are untrue and cast an entirely unfair reflection upon a man who is no
longc-r here to defend himself.

I join with you in condemning any Jew or Gentile who fosters ideas or theories or
practices subversive to the traditional American order.

I have wandered a little from the main purpose of this letter, which was to set you
right about my father. As a rule. I pay no attention to wholesale attacks upon jews or
any other group because it is my belief that usually such attacks by their very nature
answer themselves.

Very truly yours,

(Signed) JAMES P. WARBURG

REPLY BY MR. EDMONDSON

Dear Mr. Warburg; New York, Dec. 8, 1934

Yours of Dec. 4. I appreciate and sympathize with your filial, desire to submit your
record of your father's banking activities, and take pleasure in publishing and laying re¬
buttal before those to whom I mailed my pamphlet for their consideration and judgement.

If you will carefully re-read my pamphlet of Oct. 9 you will see that I do not. as
you say, "make statements about your father,” but quoted from a published printed

29

record apparently genuine even though the identity of the author may be unknown to
you. Surely an analyst may fairly allude to such data without '‘adopting' debatable pre¬
mises, when reporting associated developments.

You accuse me of holding a "deep-rooted preiudice m being anti-Jewts.i. Tnc
Standard Dictionary defines "preiudice” as "pre-judgement- without due examination.
My present active pro-American attitude was adopted about eight months ago alter
exhaustive impartial investigation and consideration t.iat indicated active U. Jewish-

Radical leadership to be dangerously anti-Arnencan. _

Therefore with absolute poiitico-economic-religious independence, 1 have no pre¬
judice deep or otherwise, in this connection. Bur 1 am glad to have your personal as¬
surance in conference, that you are convinced of my "honesty of patriotic purpose in
this crusade. Patriotic "prejudice'’ has in the past been deemed a virtue.

My "militant opposition" has not been "wholesale," as you imply, put discnimnat-
• ,‘j cnecificallv asainst "false leadership," which you yourself discredit.

” Your dedamaon? "I JOIN YOU IN CONDEMNING ANY JEW OR GENTILE
WHO FOSTERS IDEAS OR THEORIES OR PRACTICES SUBVERSIVE OF THE
TRADITIONAL AMERICAN ORDER," is tantamount to a blanket endorsement ot
practically every general premise I have implicated in my pamphlets.

Therefore, f deeplv regret that so prominent a Jew ns yourself cannot wander a
little further" from the'personal "main purpose” of writing your letter to clear a tami.v
record into individual leadership in a. vastly more vital and general fiela. My com¬
patriots and I would have been glad if you could have seen fit to fol ow your_expressed
"condemnation" of subversive jewish-Radiad elements with practical aggressive public
action something like my own. for a sound solution of the admittedly momentous Jewish
"Red” Problem- for we have not seen any specific public denunciation by you of the
energizing Jewish Communism that is dangerously menacing American Liberties—a high
duty patriotic Jews owe the country which you yourself have admitted to me nas done

more than any other for Tewry. , . r

American politics MUST NOT be ruled by Minority Power, American Economic,
MUST NOT be subject to Minority Monopoly of any k ‘°d; The Press Rauio ana
Screen incarnate bulwark ot American Freedom, MUST and SHALL BE FREE.

These are times when Principles dwarf Personalities. We are caught up m the vast
sweep of a cosmic movement. Who can stop such a- mighty momentum/ But those of us
who understand, may to some degree directly influence us implications, provided
courageous selflessness governs motive and action.

Youts for Americanism First,

I received a message from James P. Warburg, ie which it was suggested
that we hold a conference on "Americanism.” He asked me to come to his
palatial home on Fifth Avenue: but I told him that such would be unethical,
under existing circumstances, and recommended the cocktail lounge ot the
Plaza Hotel in the neighborhood, where we could each pay for hh own drinks,

We met. The preliminary was a remark by Mr. Warburg: ‘In this con¬
ference, Mr. Edmondson, I want you to understand that I am a loyal Jew.
That seemed to me to be a bad start, for wc were to discuss Americanism, and
the implication was that Mr. Warburg put his loyalty to Jewry before his

obligations to Americanism. .

Mr. Warburg told me how much he hated Communism, admitting, in¬
cidentally, that he knew many Jews were Communists. I asked for the per¬
centage, and he replied that it was not quite as high as the 85% claimed. He
admitted the crisis was pressing, and said America had done more for Jews
than any other country, and he wanted to know what he could do in the matter.
I suggested that in my judgement, the best procedure would.be for him as a
Jewish leader, to conduct a public campaign against Communism just as I was
in a Gentile movement against it.

"Oh, My God, I can’t do that" he ejaculated, without giving, any specific
reason for such attitude.

He said he didn’t like what was going on at Washington, and spoke
against Frankfurter, Morgenthau and Brandeis.

30

Mr. Warburg said he was convinced of the honesty of my patriotic purpose.
But the interview ended fruitlessly.

Later, he sent Norman Eeasely, his press agent, to my office one Saturday
afternoon, where, during a long conference at which my wife was present,
Beasley said he wanted to make us "love jimmy Warburg."

My wife ejaculated "Why should we love Jimmy Warburg?"

He said: "He's a fine fellow, and I don't want to see him hurt.”

Puzzled, I asked: "Hurt, how come?"

Beasley then admitted: "There may be a mass-march by indignant Ameri¬
cans on Washington to clean up this Communist mess."

Quickly 1 questioned: "Does Mr. Warburg fear that?"

Beasley replied: 'He does."

ADDENDA

The following was printed in Chapter E. Page 117, of the 1928 book
entitled "Walther Rathenau, His Life & Work” by Count Harry Kessler,
published by Harcourt, Brace & Co.

" 'Three Hundred Men , all acquainted with each other,’ wrote Rathenau
in 1909 in an article in the Christmas number of the New Free Press (Vienna)
control the economic destiny of the (European) Continent.’

"He himself was one of the 300. He was associated at the time with 8-1
large concerns, either as a member of the supervising board or as manager."

(Rathenau was a prominent jew of Germany who, like Otto Kahn in the
United States, sought to solve the Jewish Problem by assimiliation, but, being
opposed by disagreeing tribal leadership, and not credited as sincere by
Gentiles, he returned to the Jewish fold, Which was also done by Otto H.
Kahn and also, later, by James P. Warburg, who denounced Roosevelt, and
then voted for him later.)

"TRUE OR FALSE?"

Confessing Jewish subversions in the Franciscan Monastery of New’ York
City in the fall of 1934, addressing Rev. Peter B. Duffee and myself, Morris
Gordin, son of a Chicago Rabbi and a "former Communist,” cried dramatically:

"I can hear the footsteps of the pall-bearers carrying my people out of
America!"

CAPITALIST-JEWS BACKING COMMUNISTS?

Following are extracts from "America's Great Menace" by B. A. M.
Schapiro, Hebrew-Christian Publication Society, New York, N. Y., (1934) ;

"The time has come when the patriotic jews of America should begin to
feel the great responsibility for the evil deed (Communism) planned and
hatched in-the camp of Israel.

"Communism is tryranny worse than that of the Czarist regime * * *
The Bolshevik Revolution was first hidden, rooted and started in Leningrad
and Moscow, and thence hurled itself on the remainder of Russia. It is starting
in exactly the same way here and now.

"I meet Communists in their hunting grounds, Union Square (New York).
'How will you start the revolution here in America,’ I ask them in their own
language. Do you not think that ultimately the government will wake up and
make what you are doing illegal?’

'Then we Communists will work underground, and use the same methods
that brought about the Russian Revolution by ASSASSINATING the govern¬
ment officials and scaring the others to death. We will plant cells in their
fashionable clubs and their homes—POISON THEIR FOOD. Did we not do
so in Russia, and succeed?’

"At a mass meeting in Ness- York City commemorating the anniversary of
the death of Lenin, there were nearly 25,000 present. There were not 500

Gent ^r:slt“or their corneligionists in Russia; but why donT these
lews in their comfortable pews on Fifth Avenue and Riverside Drive take the
lTd lament and the pLyer Book and visit «uded Commun.stm

brethren and convert them to Jehovah and the Republic BEFORE 11 li

LAT1E Our coffers are full, our homes palatial, our synagogues rise, our hospi-
tals multiply. Never has Israel so increased m wealth.

"Demonstrations such as are often resorted to by Communist leaders and
their dupes will soon exhaust the patience of tolerant Americans and create in
them a spirit of hatred against all Jews, the like of which has never been seen,
for we have become an IRRITATION to our American

"The American people are long suffering to a fault, BUT THEY ARE
ESSENTIALLY MEN OF ACTION, practical men, and surely Americas
participation in the World War has shown what Americans can do when once
aroused to the conviction that their forbearance has been abused.

"Let no Jew who reads these words accuse me of trying to ingratiate myse
with 'anti-Semites.' The baptismal font has not lessened the love I cherish for
my people, but because I have a dual perspective being a Jew by birth and
See and ^ the same time a Christian by faith, I believe I can help my people,
especially since the Rabbis ignore what is ailing us, while the Christian ministry
is^ilent/ FEARING TO TOUCH THE JEWISH PROBLEM.

1935 ADDENDA

The following confession was published by Edmondson Oct. 1, 1935.

"THIS IS OUR GREAT DANGER IN AMERICA: Anti-Semites who
find a Common gmundt unified action against us, SUCH ASCOMMUN^SM
will encounter only a tissue paper opposition resisting them. -New York
Jewish Daily Bulletin of Nov. 28, 1934.

A WARNING INTERVIEW

While I was absent one day from my office in 1934, a Jew and a Gentile,
allegedly representing the U. S. Chamber of Commerce to solicit member hip
made a call. The Gencile would ask a question, then look up quickly at his
companion for approval. He took the Edmondson Service to task for publishing
a bulletin captioned "Blame Roosevelt, exposing the New Deal.

My wife informed him that I was exercising my constitutional right oi
free speech and that we believed Franklin D. Roosevelt was a traitor to The
Republic ” that the time would come when the .American people would re-
cognize that fact; that he would ultimately be the most hated President the

country ever had. , . . , ,

The Jew commented: "You, as his wife, should realize that the kind of

work he is doing puts him in a dangerous position. .

She retorted: "Robert Edward Edmondson can’t be bought and he can t be
scared He is going to keep on with his patriotic work single-handed, if neces¬
sary. I quote to you Patrick Henry: 'Is life so. sweet or peace so dear as to be

purchased at the price of chains and slavery?' ”

The lew turned around and left the office without a word
Mv wife did not sleep for many nights, fearing she had been too out¬
spoken; but audacity was precisely the right attitude, for subversive Jews fear
personal initiative and high courage.

JUSTICE BRANDEIS UNFIT?

On March 15, 1935, an Edmondson bulletin was published under the
above heading, reading:

Louis Dembitz Brandeis of Massachusetts, aged 79, is Jewish Associate
Justice of the U, S. Supreme Court, Wilson appointee, confirmed after long
opposition in the Senate.

In 1930 there appeared on the market a book entitled "The Social and
Economic Views of Mr. justice Brandeis."’ The publishers printed a pamphlet
in which this appears: '"Brandeis" ideas have been slowly changing social
chough: * * * For the past fifty years he has gone quietly about his busi¬
ness * * * to give his country a new social order—a plan now being enlarged
by our New Dealers to embrace the whole country.”

The jewish-owned New-York Times of Jan. 28, 1934, confessed: "The
underlying philosophy of the New Deal is the philosophy ol Justice Brandeis.
The Recovery Program is almost a composite of his dissenting opinions.”

The following appears in the ’ Foreword"’ of "Other People's Money,”
by Brandeis: "Back in the time when Lenin was riding the revolution and was
a symbol of it a friend said to Justice Brandeis: If you had the power to
determine the treatment the world should give to Lenin, what would" be your
course? 1 Brandeis replied: l WOULD GIVE HIM EVERYTHING HE
WISHES. It is the only way to dispose of him.’ ”

Here is the record regarding Commonwealth College at Mena, Ark., which
has been under investigation by the Arkansas Legislature as '"communistic and
subversive.” A New York Herald Tribune recent dispatch referred to ic as
"A Frc-e Love College.” "Two of the prominent financial supporters of this
institution are justice Brandeis of the Supreme Court and Mrs. Brandeis,”
said the November, 1930, issue of "The National Republic.”

"NEXT COMMUNIST PRESIDENT OF U. S.”

(On April 1, 1935, the exposure below was published by Edmondson
under the above heading:)

Carveth Wells, author of ""Kapoct,'" Fellow of the Royal Geographical
Society and the American Geographical Society, member of the Explorer's Club
of New York City, wrote Col. E, N. Sanctuary of New York City, March 9,
1935, as follows:

"At the time of my visit to Russia, the Presidental campaign of 1932 was
in full swing over here.

"In many places in Russia I saw large cartoons of Mr. Hoover entitled
'The Fathead in The White House,' and beside them very flattering portraits
of Mr. Roosevelt entitled "THE NEXT COMMUNIST PRESIDENT OF
THE UNITED STATES'.

"At the time the names of Bullitt and Tugwell were unknown to me, so
that I was puzzled when young Communist guides asked me when Comrade
Tugwell was going to have Russia recognized, and said Comrade Bullitt was
going to be the first ambassador. Future events showed that the youne Com¬
munists of Russia knew more about American politics than I did.”

Elizabeth Dilling says in her "Roosevelt Red Record” that "Both Com¬
munist and Socialist Parties demanded U. S. recognition of the Soviet Union,
self-styled "base of world revolution.’ Roo.sevc-it invited its ex-bandit repre¬
sentative, Litvinoff (Finkelsteir.) to the White House to be entertained with
honors, AND RECOGNIZED THE SOVIET NOVEMBER 16 , 1933.’ ”

AN APPEAL TO AMERICAN MANHOOD

Under the caption above, on April 15, 1935, Edmondson broadcast a
signed call and appeal as below:

To One Hundred Million American Freemen:

Now is the time to lend every possible financial and other support to a
self-less PRO-American Crusade with no racket to serve or complex to nurse—
(1) One that is consecrating directly to campaign expense, every dollar re¬
ceived; (2) That KNOWS the great peril the nation is facing, and the real
remedy therefor; (3) That has demonstrated capacity to face facts in the raw,
without fear or favor; (4) That is attacking the Cancerous Cause instead of
its radiating Symptoms, and has achieved vitally important coast-to-coast
results in less than a year; (5) That has concrete practical constructive plans
which, adequately financed, properly focused and boldly executed, cannot fail
to overthrow an alien-admitted "tissue-paper resistance," and restore representa¬
tive Constitutional Government; (6) Whose crusade contemplates EXACT
JUSTICE for Gentile and Jew,

"Trustees of Great Wealth," amassed through the operation of the natural
law of "increasing returns," sit supinely and blindly inert while the "back¬
bone" of the nation dies by inches in a sinister attrition, oblivious to the fact
that if the Communism they may hope to defeat by a do-nothing policy, shall
pass on, they might face confiscation by an outraged middle-class who hold
that such riches were bestowed as a trust for the salvation of America in time
of peril.

Why longer dally with a danger that may flame into civil war?

Let us strike now like men, with the full patriotic power of never-defeated
America, at the CAUSE of Communism and its ballyhooing dupes.

If you can’t afford to contribute cash, be a Paul Revere and personally
broadcast the deadly peril—by spoken and written word.

The evangelical fervor of aroused American public opinion, in an in¬
vincible self-preservation crusade, will liberate the subsidized "great power of
the press" and smash this "Cross of Gold."

Are Americans to be Slaves or Masters in their own House?

"JERSEY GOES JEWISH!"

The exclamation of a well-known New York lawyer supplied the above
caption over an April 15, 1935 Edmondson publication after bearing chat
Governor Hoffman of New Jersey had signed "racial-religious" Assembly Act
257, ' repealing ’ Section 3, Article 1, of the State Constitution guaranteeing to
all citizens "free speech liberties."

Here is a composite of the new law signed April 8, 1935: Any person
or organization who shall utter any speech or declaration, or have in his
possession for the purpose or with intent to utter, give away, circulate by-
exhibiting, or by radio, to the view of another person, any statement, speech,
pronouncement or printed or multigraphed matter, or emblem, photograph,
banner or flag, which, in any way, in any part thereof, tends to promote or
promotes or incites hostility, hatred or violence against any group’or persons
residing or being in this state—by reason of race, color, religion or manner of
worship, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and punished by a fine of $200 to
$5,000 or a 90-day or 3-year imprisonment.

34

If there is any doubt as to the Jewish origin of this Jersey abortion, the
following special dispatch to the New York Jewish Daily Bulletin from Tren¬
ton, N. J. s April 10, 1935, will clarify the atmosphere: "Jewish leaders in
New Jersey were highly elated today over the new anti-Nazi law approved
last night bv Governor Hoffman, prohibiting the dissemination of ANTI-
JEWISH propaganda throughout the state.”

1941 ADDENDA

The Rafferty Act of New jersey, prohibiting anti-Jewish propaganda, was
declared on December 5, 1941 by the New Jersey Supreme Court to be un¬
constitutional because of abridgement of free speech; the court unanimously
holding that the anti-Jewish language of nine speakers attacking Jew's before a
German-American Bund meeting in June, 1940, did not constitute "a clear and
present danger to the peace and safety of the state."

New' York No Longer an American City

One evening soon after the circulation of "Jersey Goes Jewish.” there was
a loud knock at the door of the Edmondson New York apartment, My wile
opened the door—and drew back. In the hallway ranked along the walls were
New York police with tommy guns aimed at the door.

'■’What is the matter?” exclaimed my wife.

"Are vou Mrs. Edmondson?”

"Yes,” she replied.

"Having any trouble inside”

"No, why?”

"Police Headquarters ordered us here because of an anonymous telephone
call saying your husband was shooting you up.’ ”

"Want to come in and see?” my wife asked.

"Yes"—and two officers came in. They came to where I was having a

sandwich in the kitchen, looked me over. One of them said:

'Where's the gun?”

I replied ”1 have no gun.”

The officers were making a fruitless search when the leader of the
"army” called out:

"It's al! right, boys. Another hoax! Our men have traced the anonymous
call to a candy shop over on the avenue, where it was stated that an un¬
known man had recently used the phone to call police headquarters. Let's go!”

The platoon filed out grinning sheepishly, with my wife laughing at them.
I called to the men:

"My guess is that somebody didn’t like my last bulletin headed 'Jersey
Goes Jewish.’ ”

The foregoing is a sample of the many annoyances—trivial dementia
emanations from unbalanced vindictive and revengeful mentalities wallowing
in futile insensate hate—to which the Edmondsons were subjected during their
patriotic crusade in a cosmopolitan city no longer American and under control
of alien elements.

ROOSEVELT IMPEACHABLE? 3

The following is from an Edmondson bulletin of April 22, 1935:

The letter quoted below, dated Washington, D. C., April 16, 1935, has
been received from Congressman Joseph A. Gavagan, Democrat, 21st N. Y.
Dish, which covers the Harlem section in which Communistic rioting occurred:

"I am in receipt of your recent ravings. Piety prompts me to charity, and
charity questions your sanity. You are quite suggestive of the APA, the KKK
and the recent madness in Germany. To which of these do you owe your soul?
History suggests that 'patriotism' has always been the refuge of a scoundrel.
Granting you are 'one-half of one per cent' American, you should curb your
bitterness or hate when you refer to the President of the United States. Any
good American w'ould insist on your doing so were you to utter orally in his
presence your spleen. The patriotism of President Roosevelt needs no defence
nor defenders. As a citizen, however, I desire to suggest to you to seek the
quiet and sanctuary of an institution where science strives for reclamation of
disordered minds."

Waving aside "ravings." I reply first to your allusion to principles, which,
in this crisis, transcend pusillanimous personalities and their rantings.

Assuming to deliver "a patriotic lecture," you say: "You should curb your
bitterness or hate -when you refer to the President of the United States," etc.

Since when has the Republic crowned its Servant-Presidents with an aura
of immunity from justified condemnatory free-speech criticism? Those Ameri¬
cans who retain their sanity in the current Roosevelt political inferno seem to
be in perfect agreement on the point that "His Imperial Majesty" has made the
American Government Master of Man—in reversal of our written Constitution.

The primary meaning of "spleen" is "anger;" but, judging from the "pious
and charitable" tenor of vour letter. I infer that vou have endowed the term

j J /

with malice and malevolence. However, the writer's pro-American anti-Roosevelt
literature of the past year has been, inspired solely by jewish-Radical Leader¬
ship’s anti-Americanism, having nothing directly to do with different races,
individuals or religion.

Were 1 confronted today personally by Franklin Delano Roosevelt, as a
loyal native American citizen who "owes" his patriotic soul to the "Spirit of
'76," exercising Constitutional rights of free speech, I would boldly say:

"Mr. President; in mv opinion—which is not incompetently supported—
YOU ARE IMPEACHABLE ON THE FOLLOWING COUNTS:

"In my judgment, you repeatedly violated your Presidential oath to
preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States by usurping,
in time of peace, functions expressly reserved by it to the Legislative and the
Judicial Departments of the Government, specifically, when you and your
advisors—

"(a) Attempted to 'regulate the value of money' (which is sole-
power of Congress) through manipulation of the Federal Reserve Monetary
System, national credit, dollar devaluation, and foreign exchange currency
market.

"(b) By arrogation of the Congressional sole-power to levy and collect
taxes, and disburse untold millions of dollars in the administration of the
AAA—later declared illegal by the Supreme Court.

" (c) In defiance of anti-monopoly laws, your NRA administration usurped
powers reserved to the Judiciary—which found it also illegal.

3 <5

"(d) You and your advisors gave aid and comfort to the enemies of
Americans by ignoring protests and maintaining diplomatic relations with the
Moscow Soviets in promotion of thc-ir Communistic undermining of the liberties
of the Republic.

"Furthermore, in my judgement, promises made by you as candidate have
been directly broken as President, notably, to maintain bound money at all
hazards’—instead of which the dollar has been devalued and contracts dis¬
honorably repudiated; to establish a tariff commission 'free from executive
interference'—whereas dictatorial power has been demanded and received;
to ‘reduce Government expenses 25 per cent,' whereas they have progressively
enlarged to crushing proportions; to lower the national debt, whereas it is
now at record high; to cut down bureaucracy, which has tremendously ex¬
panded: to 'bring economic rc-covc-rv,' whereas it has been deliberately blocked
by wholesale and impractical reforms that broadly upset confidence, without
which recovery is impossible, under your regime state sovereignty has been
violated and' other Constitutional liberties of the people have been com-
munistically suppressed and fascistically centralized.

“Responsibility rests where power lies, Mr. Roosevelt.'

So much, Mr. Gavagan, for Mr. Roosevelt's "patriotism"—which you say
"needs no defenders/’

If that be treason to Americanism, "make the most of it! ’

THRIVING ON ’ 'PERSECUTION"

(From August 1, 1935, Edmondson bulletin)

Jewish Comedian "Eddie” Cantor exhibited apprehension in a "persecu¬
tion" speech before a B’nai B’rith Convention July 1, 1935, in Los Angeles,
regarding an approaching Jewish world crisis. He said:

"You know the Jewish situation in Europe—BUT I DOUBT IF MANY
OF YOU KNOW HOW CLOSE TO THE SAME SITUATION WE ARE
IN AMERICA.’

Let us dispassionately turn the Searchlight of Truth on the persecution
propaganda record, and analyze historic facts.

GENTILE "PERSECUTION” OF JEWS

The Dispersion (beginning A. D. 70) under Roman order, was apparently
regarded as "persecution’' by Lord Rothschild, for in talking with British States¬
man Balfour in 1917 referring to the Ziomst-Palestine hope, he said his people
"had no home where they could lay their heads."

Irving L. Potter’s pamphlet on "The Cause of Anti-Jewism in the U. S.»”
says: "The Jews were expelled from England in 1290. They gained control of
trade, monopolized manufacturing and financial operations. The King caused
280 Jews to be hanged in London for having corrupted the English coin. For
nearly 400 years no Jew was allowed in England.

"In 1492 Queen Isabella urged the expulsion of the jews from Spain. It
is estimated that more than 200,000 "were banished.

"The Jews were driven out of France four times, the last in 1394. French
commerce was entirely in their hands. The Paris of the Middle Ages was al¬
most a Jewish City.”

Ingram Hughes says in "Anti-Semitism: A World Survey,” 1934 edition:
-"Massacres of Jews occurred in Germany and. Poland in 1836-/. In 1881
occurred a series of pogroms in Russia."

Expulsion of Tews from Germany under Hitler as communists.

JEWISH "PERSECUTION’' OF GENTILES

Digging into the historical record of fact, authority and evidence, the un¬
biased investigator finds that in ancient Babylon* reign of Ahasuerus, jews are
reported as having killed 70,000 Babylonians—in memory of which event they
celebrate their holiday "Purim." Was this a "persecution" of Gentiles?

Gibbon, the historian, quotes the Roman pro-Consul of Africa, Dion
Cassius, as saying that 220,000 Greeks were massacred by Jews in Cyrene,
240,000 in Cyprus, and "a very great multitude in Egypt."

The persecution-by-fire of Christians by Nero (whose wife was a converted
Jewess) anticipated by 19 centuries the slaughter of millions of Russians by
the Tewish Bolsheviki.

* Rabbi Browne in his 1924 book, "How Odd of God," says: "WE intend
to REMAKE the Gentiles—WHAT THE COMMUNISTS ARE DOING IN
RUSSIA.”

On Dec. 13, 1933, the Jewish National Anti-Defamation League issued a
circular from Chicago headquarters saying: "Scribner & Sons have just published
a book by Madison Grant entitled 'The Conquest of a Continent. It is extremely
antagonistic to Jewish interests, for the author insists that American develop¬
ment depends upon the elimination of unassimilabie alien masses in our midst.
WE ARE INTERESTED IN STIFLING THE SALE OF THIS BOOK.'’ In
other words, the Jews ordered a ' persecution boycott on a pro-American
analysis. The present international trade boycott 'persecution' 'of Germany for
expelling Jewish Communists is being energized by prominent American Jews
—Rabbi Wise and Samuel Untermyer,

HOW JEWS PROFITED BY "PERSECUTION''

We now come to evidence showing where Jewry has REALIZED A NET
PROFIT from "persecution.” Prof. Werner Sombart says in his 1913 "Jews
and Modern Capitalism": "It may be somewhat inexplicable that, while through¬
out the Middle Ages, Jews were deprived of their All, they managed to be¬
come very rich again. THE JEWS WERE NEVER MULCTED. A good portion
of their wealth was transferred to fictitious ownership.” "Other races have
come and gone. The Jew has survived. Persecution cannot crush him. HE IS
THE ARISTOCRAT OF THE WORLD," boasted Samuel Untermyer, in a
speech April 13, 1933, quoted in the London "Investigator” of June, 1935.

The victorious "Russian" Revolutionary Bolshevist Council of 500 included
over 400 Jewish members.

The League of Nations was created by Jewry, according to Jewish writers.

Who is the "Father’’ of the New Deal? Brandeis, Who is Chief Execu¬
tioner? Frankfurter. Who is "Unofficial President"? Baruch. Who is in control
of gold and banking but the Morgenthaus? The Palestine Zionist Mandate has
been followed by Jewish acquisition of hundreds of billions of Dead Sea
mineral wealth. The gold and diamond fields of South Africa are Jewish-owned.

"Our coffers are full, our homes palatial, our synagogues rise, our hospitals
multiply. Never in the palmy days of our history has Israel so increased in
wealth * * * The time has come when patriotic Jews of America should feel
the great responsibility for the evil deed (Communism) hatched and planned
in the Camp of Israel," says B. A. M. Schapiro, "A Jew by Race, a Christian
by Faith,” in a pamphlet on "America's Great Menace.’

HAS JEWRY THRIVED ON "PERSECUTION”?

38

CAPITALIST SYSTEM JEW-PERVERTED?

(From Edmondson Bulletin of Aug. 1, 1935)

Prof. Werner Sombart, in his "Jews & Modern Capitalism,” 1913, holds
the market in shares from 1800-1950 to be of equal significance with the ex¬
pansion of the House of Rothschild, saying: ''The name of Rothschild means
more than the firm. It means ALL JEWDOM SO FAR AS THE STOCK
EXCHANGE is concerned; for only with the help of compatriots could the
Rothschilds have reached their position of power—which dominates all others

_ an d obtain ENTIRE MASTERY OF THE STOCK EXCHANGE. In ordet

to obtain command of the stock exchange and the money market all possible
means were utilized. The Rothschilds practiced stock jobbing in the narrowei
sense which the French attach to the word. They employed the expedient of
artificially influencing the market by creating a favorable atmosphere. The
capitalist "movement reached its highest point in the speculation banks. By means
of loaning speculative securities, banks are placed in a position, by acquiring-
other securities at a cheap price, to create the impression that money is plentiful
and is accompanied by a desire to buy. Thus powder of creating an upward
movement in prices is easily acquired—and this porver can be reversed just as
easily to depress prices by depredating the store of available securities. The
great banks, accordingly, hold the handle which controls the machine called the
stock exchange. And the heads of the banks tend more and more TO BECOME
ENTIRE MASTERS OF ECONOMIC LIFE.” Holding key position in politics
and finance, the system of espionage employed places these Internationalists in
a position to obtain quicker and more reliable stock exchange, financial and
speculative-investment information than anybody else, not excepting govern¬
ment, according to over thirty years’ experience by the undersigned .in the active
investment field. Sombart further declares that: "Capitalism was born from the
money loan. Money fending contains the root idea of capitalism. Turn to the
pages of the Talmud and you will find that the Jews made an art of lending
money. They were taught early to look for their chief happiness in the posses¬
sion of money. They fathomed all the secrets that Lay hid in money. They be¬
came Lords of Money and Lords of the World.”

ARBITRARY DISARMAMENT
AFFIDAVIT

STATE OF NEW YORK,

COUNTY OF NEW YORK. SS.:

Robert Edward Edmondson of New York, N. Y., being duly sworn, deposes and says:

On Aug. 7, 1934, David Gallup, Jewish Statistician of Ira Haupt & Co. Stock
Brokers, 50 Broadway, Nc-w York City, invaded my office at 80 Washington St., New
York city, and, shoving into my hands a communication he said I sent him, angrily
shouted: "I 13 'get you' for that."

Glancing at it, I replied: "I never saw it,” handing it back.

"Yes, you have, and I’ll get you’ for it," he retorted, advancing excitedly and shak¬
ing his fist in my face.

Gallup is a young and physically powerful man, fully capable of carrying into effect
his threats; is a "prize-fight fan,” according to a letter of June 25 he wrote to me;
while I, at 62, am past the age of physical prowess, and wear glasses.

I was sitting cornered behind my desk at the time, with my secretary, sole witness,
beside me. Unable to offer any adequate physical defense against what was a definite
menacing movement probably involving bodily injury, from a man who seemed to have lost
his head, and who had previously visited me, antagonistically and angrily objecting to
my anti-Jewish-Radical publications; understanding the legal definition of assault to be
"threats or menaces coupled with real or apparent intent and ability to commit bodily
harm or injury"; having a pistol under permit to safeguard against Communist threats
previously made; believing I was within the bounds of propriety in defensively displaying
my revolver—I lifted the latter from a desk drawer and, laying it on the desk WITH¬
OUT POINTING, I said to Gallup: "Get out!”

"Oh, I see you've got a gun," he shouted, "Ail right, I'Ll TAKE CARE OF
THAT."

With that, he left, angrily repeating, "I'll get you.” '

Notwithstanding the foregoing affidavit, supported by witness, dated Feb. 1, 1935.
pistol permit was revoked by half-Jew Mayor La Guardia, and restoration refused regard¬
less of written statement by Edmondson's New York Counsel that "there is not a word
of evidence of Edmondson's improper use of his pistol.”

Charles Hall Davis, leading Virginia Constitution lawyer, wrote: "On the face of the
facts as set out in your affidavit it seems to me that the action of the N. Y. Police
Department in revoking your pistol permit was absolutely unjustiried. ... 1 think i:
would be wise for you to publish the affidavit, sc that the people may know the facts,
and in case of any future threat the full responsibility for vour helplessness may bt
fairly chargeable to the department which revoked your permit for insufficient reasons."

A bulletin was broadcast Mar. 1. 1935, reporting the event.

A SELF-PRESERVATION FIGHT

The following was broadcast by Edmondson from coast to coast on Sept.
18, 1935:

Beiow is an invitation-speech delivered by Robert Edward Edmondson
before "The National Sentinels" of the Republic on Constitution Day, Sept.
17, 1935, at the Hotel Montclair, New York City:

“Sentinels of The Republic!

“I am honored in having the privilege of addressing you regarding my
work in this great national crisis.

"The subject is too immense, too complex, too loaded with dynamite, for
extemporaneous treatment. We are trying to solve in a fragment of time, a
problem centuries old. For your own self-interest, I beg you to listen with open
minds. You will hear nothing but a record of fact and authority.

"I have been publicly exposing secret Anti-Americanism by POLITICAL
Jewish Leadership, which I believe to be promoting Communistic plans to
overthrow our Government.

"This is no time for suppression of FRANK FREE SPEECH. It is not a
question of race class or religious PRIVILEGES. IT IS A FIGHT FOR THE
PRESERVATION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC. For ITS self-
preservation, as well as their OWN, the Constitution imposes a DUTY on its
citizenship TO DEFEND IT AGAINST ALL COMERS.

"Instigated by pressure of economic inconsistencies, an exhaustive research
going back thousands of years PROVES MY THESIS FROM JEWISH RE¬
CORDS THEMSELVES. Theodor Herzl, "Father” of Zionism, Dr, Oscar Levy
and other prominent Jews agree that Jews furnish the driving power for BOTH
Communism and Capitalism.

“Preliminary to a study of this problem, the word "Jew” must be accepted
as symbolizing a TRINITY-minority, namely, A Race, A Nationality, A Reli¬
gion. The basic issue is NOT religion. It is fundamentally ECONOMIC. The
CHIEF CREATION and Weapon of Jewry is DEBT.

"As a patriot, I am not against Jews on ANY of the three counts cited. I
became definitely anti-Jewish in April, 1934, upon being convinced that
Jewry’s unrepudiated leadership was destroying Americanism.

"PRECISELY the same attitude would be taken were any other minority
so offending,

'In the final analysis, we are up against a Satanic philosophy crystallized
bv centuries of absorption into an unscrupulous, predatory and inhuman Gospel

0 £ Q et _practiced upon what its ruthless power-drunk leadership falsely calls 'A

Gentile Common Enemy.’

- Lords of the World

"Author Sombart ("Jews & Modern Capitalism," 1913) naively outlines
p n j s c - r eed thus: 'Jews were Height early to find rheir chief happiness in the
possession of money. They made an ART of lending money. They became
LORDS of money—-and Lords of THE WORLD.’

"In an agonized Jeremiad against the false leadership of his people, Dr.
Oscar Lew. noted London Jewish Savant, cried out in 1920: We who have
promised to lead you to a New Heaven, have landed you in a New Hell.'

"1 do not accuse every Jew. But my premise is that, as we are in a Conflict
wome than Civil War owing to the parasitical penetration of a generous, un¬
suspecting host, self-preservation demands NO exception for 'Pet Jews’ or
Gentile TOOLS, until the battle is won.

"My campaign has revived the age-old cry of 'Persecution;' but the un¬
varnished historic record proves that Jewry has actually THRIVED on so-called
persecution—CASHING IN on the SYMPATHY of the world.

"Futhermore, Jewish Leadership has usurped supreme political power
throughout the world Finkelstein-Litvinoff is President of the Council of The
League of Nations, itself admittedly a Jewish idea; Lord Reading, with Samuels,
Sassoon and other Jews, rule England; Jewish-blooded Laval is Premier of
France, whose Government is SHOT THROUGH with his tribe; The Big
Five of the Soviet Regime, with their ambassadors to England, Germany, Italy
and the United States, are ALL Jewish by ancestry or marriage.

"At home, we have 'Father Brandeis’ of the New Deal; as Executor, 'Karl
Marx Professor' Frankfurter; 'Unofficial President' Baruch; International
Bankers Morgenthau and Lehman; Roosevelt's 'Right-Arm' Rosenman—all so
titled by a boastful JEWISH publication—the Brooklyn Jewish Examiner.

"As a veteran journalist, I tell you that over 95 per cent of our metropoli¬
tan daily press is Jew-cowed by politico-economic pressure. Out of 1,800
managing editors of leading American dailies, to whom 1 recently sent a per¬
sonal fraternal patriotic appeal, with 'Proof of Plot,' TWO ONLY HAD TEIE
COL1RAGE TO REPLY. Our Citizens are BLINDED by the 'kept men of
the press.'

"Economic Cancer being the basic CAUSE of the trouble, Economic SUR¬
GERY is the REAL Cure; but the IMMEDIATE destroying agency is POLITI¬
CAL. As the necessary PURGING of politics can come ONLY through public
enlightenment, the PRIMARY remedy is PUBLICITY,

"Therefore, with the press unavailable, my work has been directed along
the Voltarian thesis that revolutions can be COUNTERED, as well as pro¬
moted, by PAMPHLETEERING.

"What can we PERSONALLY DO?

"Use the latest WEAPON OF THE ENEMY. BOYCOTT Jewish pro¬
duction. BUY Loyal Gentile. Boycott Jewish POLITICANS.

"Above All, FREE YOUR PRESS. It is America’s FIRST LINE OF
Defence. BOYCOTT unpatriotic publications which do not print ALL the news
or POLITICALLY DISTORT headlines. Withhold ADVERTISING patron¬
age—Their LIFEBLOOD.

''History proves that THE WORST happens to those who won’t believe it
CAN happen. Are treasonably negligent Americans going to give up their
PRICELESS LIBERTY-BIRTHRIGHT, bought with centuries of untold sacri¬
fice, for AN INTERNATIONAL MESS OF COMMUNISTIC POTTAGE?

"Sentinels of The Republic! MAKE NO MISTAKE!

'"We are not in a racial, class or religious conflict. IT IS A FIGHT FOR
SELF-PRESERVATION!

"An historic Hour of Decision is upon, us! The COMMUNISTIC Die
is Cast!

TO AMERICAN FARMERS

The following was published by Edmondson Oct, 15, 1935;

Farmers of America!

You are being fooled by alien anti-national financialists. Watch your step!

Are you going to surrender your Birthright of Freedom for a Mess of
Internationalism?

The "dole" you receive from Washington is America’s heritage of Work¬
ing Capital. When it is gone—WHAT THEN?

This is not Republican or Democratic or other political partisan propa¬
ganda. It is an American PATRIOTIC APPEAL to save the Republic.

Look at the farmers of Russia! Are they FREE? No! Millions have been
"liquidated’' and millions enslaved by Internationalists.

Read this: "What Jewish Idealism and Jewish Discontent have so power¬
fully contributed to produce in Russia, the same Historic Qualities of the Jewish
Mind are tending to promote IN OTHER COUNTRIES. The Jew evolved
organized capitalism, with its working instrumentality, the banking system.”—
The American Hebrew, Sept. 20, 1920.

Communizing enemies of the Republic have been inciting farm against
city and city against farm. The interests of each are as identical as those of
industrial capital and labor. WHO will buy from you if the city cannot pay
price advances caused by the destruction of food?

The farmer receives too little for his products and the citv pays too much.
WHO GETS THE PROFIT? The Middleman. WHO is this Middleman? An
un-American PARASITE.

We have been sold out to a foreign foe! We are in a war for SELF-PRES¬
ERVATION against the most deadly enemy that ever menaced the Republic.

The undersigned PRO-American is not afraid of what the enemv is doing
so much as WHAT AMERICANS ARE NOT DOING to save the Country
to which they owe ALI..

It’s up to you, Farmers of America to "RESCUE THE REPUBLIC"

A JEWISH CONFESSION OF GUILT

(From Edmondson Bulletin of Oct. 19, 1935)

To remove any doubt as to the authenticity of the astounding sadistic con¬
fession in part quoted below, boldly addressed to Gentiles, the undersigned
desires to say that he has the Century Magazine in which it was printed, as
published in the January, 1928, issue.

The author of the article uses a boastful pen-name; "Marcus Eli Ravage”
—translated "The Big Destruction Hammer of God.” He is said to be a
Roumanian Jew, and has written a number of books.

The title, "The Real Case Against the Jews,” uncovers a tragic wise¬
cracking audacity elevated to the nth power of expression, dramatized in a

4 2

£

t

%

$

'i

4

k

8

?

•£

%

devastating!)’ penetrating admission of universal guilt so appalling, yet com¬
pletely confirming to those who hold the key, as to put it at once in the classi¬
fication of the "protocols,” whose predictions are being fulfilled today with

precision.

"Of course you DO resent US JEWS. The thing that intrigues me about
this anti-Jewish business, however, is your TOTAL LACK OF GRIT. You
seem to be suffering with self-consciousness horribly. It is not as if you were
amateurs—you have been at it for over 15 centuries. You resent us, but you
cannot clearly say why.

"We are. if you are to be believed, a menace to your racial integrity. We
shirk our patriotic duty in wartime, because we are pacifists by nature and
tradition,

"You accuse us of stirring up revolution in Moscow’. Suppose we admit
the charge, WHAT OF IT?

"Take the three principal revolutions in modern times—the French, Ameri¬
can and Russian. What are they but the triumph of the Jewish idea of social,
political and economic justice? And che end is still a long wav off. WE STILL
DOMINATE YOU.

"You make much noise and fury about the undue Jewish influence in your
theatres and movie palaces. Granted, your complaint is well-founded. But what
is that compared with our STAGGERING INFLUENCE in your churches, your
schools, your laws and your government, and the very thoughts you think?""

"You believe ‘The Protocols of che Eiders of Zion.' But what is that beside
the unquestionable and historical conspiracy which we have carried out, and
which we have never denied because you have never had the courage to charge
us with it?

"You call us subverters, agitators, revolution-mongers. IT IS THE TRUTH
—and I cower at your discovery,

"You have not begun to appreciate the real depth of our guilt. We have
taken your natural world, your ideals, your destiny, and played havoc with
them. We are at the bottom not merely of the latest great war, but nearly all
your wars. We have brought discord and confusion and frustration into your
personal and public life. WE ARE STILL DOING IT. We did it solely with
the irresistible might of our spirit, with ideas and propaganda,

"If we were in your place we should dislike you more cordially than you
do us. BUT WE SHOULD MAKE NO BONES ABOUT TELLING YOU
WHY. You go about whispering terrifyingly of the hand of the Jew in this
and that. IT MAKES US QUAKE. We are conscious of the injury we did when
we imposed upon you our alien faith and traditions. And then you specify
and talk vaguely of Jewish financiers and Jewish motion picture promoters,
and our terror dissolves in laughter. The Gentiles, we see with relief, will never
know the REAL BLACKNESS OF OUR CRIMES.

"Can you wonder that we Jews have always taken your anti-Semites rather
lightly, as long as they did not resort to VIOLENCE?”

When one comes ro fuLl realization of what all-engulfing insensate power
surging emotion wields over even disciplined individual minds, then will be
understood their deep fear of mob violence. Jewish Leadership is past-master in
evaluating mass-psychology,

'JEWS ARE COMMUNISTS

(James Waterman Wise in "The New Masses” of Oct. 29, 1935.)

Claiming that the CONSERVATIVE element of Jewry is misrepresenting
it in belittling Jewish Communism, James Waterman Wise, Rabbi Wise's son,
in the Oct. 29, 1935, issue of "The New' Masses’ (edited mostly by Jew's)
attacks the ’'statistic-buttressed” proclamation broadcast Oct. 21 by the Ameri¬
can Jewish Committee, the B'nai B'rith and the Jewish Labor Committee.

"These three representative Jewish organizations publicly challenged the
recent Hitler charge that the Jewish race predominated in the Communist move¬
ment in Germany, and in addition declared that only a few of the rulers of
the Soviets are Jewish.”

Says James Waterman Wise:

"Jews are not Communists,” is the burden of 2 statement issued jointly by
Dr. Cyrus Adler, President .of the American Jewish Committee; Alfred M.
Cohen, President of the B’nai B’rith; and B. C. Vladeck, Chairman of the Jewish
Labor Committee.

"These gentlemen hysterically deny that Communism is Jewish, and
frenziedly repudiate Jews who are Communists. Their statement libels Soviet
Russia and lies about the Jewish people.

"Let us analyze their statement, the First attempts to show that the Jews
of Germany and of other countries were not and are not Communists. The
Second, that Communism and the Soviet Union are themselves foes of Jews and
Judaisim. Of Soviet Russia, it says: ’Among the 3 6 Commissars who constitute
Soviet Russia, only two are Jews.’

"Is it possible that the heads of the American Jewish Committee, the B’nai
B’rith and the Jewish Labor Committee, have never heard of Litvinoff, of
Yaroslovsky, Kaganowitch, Radek, Bela Kun? Jew's who deny that many Jews
are Communists are jockeying themselves into the position of citizens on
toleration.

"Will not tdie gentlemen who today disclaim Jewish Communists, tomor¬
row disclaim Jewish Socialists?

"That the authors of this piece of perfidy do not represent THE MASSES
of American Jews, will be made abundantly clear. To counteract its poison and
to preclude its repetition, Jews must take active and positive measures. There
must be a widening and strengthening of the united front against fascism. And,
if by taking full part in the forging of this united front, the Jews of America
write themselves down as Communists—SO BE IT.”

The foregoing statements supply a complete justification of the writer’s
strong contention for many months that a majority of Jews are Communistic.
Why was the Communist Party mass meeting called on June 2, 1934, at Madi¬
son Square Garden to endorse the Soviet, sponsored by 100 Jewish organiza¬
tions?

COMMUNISM THE GOAL OF A. C. L. U.?

(From Edmondson Bulletin of Nov. 1, 1935)

"The American Civil Liberties Union is a supporter of all subversive
movements in the U. S.”—Lusk report to N. Y. State Legislature in 1928.

"The ACLU is closely affiliated with the COMMUNIST movement in
the U. S., and fully 90% of its efforts are on behalf of COMMUNISTS who
have come into conflict with the law. It is quite apparent that its main function

•jj2

44

i< to attempt to protect COMMUNISTS in their advocacy of force to overthrow
the U. S. Government.”—House of Representatives Report 2290 of Jan. 17,

1931.-

Roger N. Baldwin, former IWW, alumnus of Harvard University, des¬
cribes himself as follows in the April Class Book of 1933, according to Donald
Parson, a classmate, writing to the N. Y. Herald Tribune Oct. S, 1935: I
have continued directing the unpopular fight for the right of agitation, AS
DIRECTOR of the ACLU. I have been to Europe several times, mostly in
connection with INTERNATIONAL RADICAL ACTIVITY. I am for Social¬
ism. I seek social ownership of property and the abolition of the propertied
class. COMMUNISM is the goal!''

The International Labor Defense aids COMMUNISTS arrested for revo¬
lutionary activities. The ACLU 1931 report prints this: 'The ACLU early in
the struggle raised money and aided the defense committees of both the IWW

and "iLD”

Hundreds of other similar cases are given on page after page in the Red
Network.” William Z. Foster, COMMUNIST candidate for President in 1932,
was an ACLU Committeeman until 1930. Harry F. Ward, ACLU Chairman,
admits cooperation with COMMUNISTS, according to Page 331 of the Red
Network.”

Reporting an anti-war meeting of students April 12, 1935, the N. Y. Sun
said: "Roger N. Baldwin, ACLU Director, spoke as follows: 'We cannot main¬
tain an organization worthy of its name without COMMUNISM.

Felix Frankfurter. "Karl Marx Professor of Harvard,” born in Vienna, is
listed as a National Committeeman of the American Civil Liberties Union.

Frankfurter was appointed Counsel of the Mooney Commission and tried
to enlist the influence of Former President Theodore Roosevelt to aid Mooney,
a COMMUNIST. The ex-President wrote Frankfurter Dec. 19, 19! T , as fol¬
lows: "You have taken an attitude which seems to me fundamentally that of
Trotsky and the other Bolsheviki leaders.”

ROOSEVELT’S SUPREME COUNCIL
(Prom Edmondson Bulletin of Nov, 15, 1935)

The six-point Solomon Star Picture below, presenting "AMERICA'S IN¬
VISIBLE GOVERNORS" and important "allies,” gives only part of a long
list of New Deal "Supreme Council’' members surrounding President F. D.
Roosevelt.

The above interlaced triangle Star Seal of Jewish Ownership—on all syna¬
gogues—now appears on U. S. Post Office dead letter envelopes; U. S, Army
Helmets, Sixth Division; U. S. Navy Dept, seals; new one dollar bills; medal
of President Roosevelt; Masonic Lodges; Police Badges of Chicago and
Milwaukee.

In the 1937 World Almanac under "U. S. Presidents and Their Wives,”
appears this: "Franklin Delano Roosevelt was the son of James Roosevelt,
a direct descendant of Claes Martenzan van ROSENVELT, who arrived in
New Amsterdom in 1649 and married Jannetje SAMUELS.”

£

Sr

|

si

Ti

w

ji

£

r 2?

3

<A

£

>

<>

5

I

•I

46

COMMUNIZING THE CONSTITUTION

,p r0 , Speech Delivered by Robert Edward Edmondson Before Audience of
j ( 500 . aPa Meeting of The American National Labor Party m New York City,

^Nta^nd 5 Women of America: KNOW your Government. Until you do,
vou cannot Protect, Preserve and Defend your Country.

The United States Government is neither a True Democracy nor a True
Reoublic, It IS AN AGENCY, established and existing by reason of a written
Constitution which limits its control over the 48 states through the giving
g bv heir people of only eighteen listed powers, delegated for he purpose o
the different national object! of the union. The states especially reserved all
other powers to themselves. The Washington National Government has powers
over the states ONLY to the extent necessary for NATIONAL operations.

In jealous guardianship of all their state tights, the Framers and Founders
of the United States Federation carefully avoided the creation of a dangerous

cencral^Wa^hmgton „o ^ ^ GOVERN THEMSELVES through a DOUBLE

Political System of STRICTLY LIMITED POWERS.

The ONLY kind of a government communizing or socializing internation¬
alists CAN EASILY SUBVERT is a liberalized or true democracy, because such
mob-rule is quickly misled by confusion propaganda.

Therefore the plan of socialistic communiz.ers is to work always tor any¬
thing that will cause a "leveling down" of electoral intelligence to the lowest

democratic average.

The price of liberty is eternal vigilence. We have failed to guard the price¬
less gift of common sense liberty given to us by the wise men of '6.

• German National Socialism, as outlined by its leader should so ve Ger¬
many’s problems because it is founded in Patriotism—which the Jew tears be
cause it is his worst enemy. But our Individual Americanism is-best tor_ the
United States because Americans decide their affairs as individuals. Further¬
more America cannot have a "single racial soul, for it is made up of many
races’ It was founded on A Great Principle^that of Individual Freedom. ^
must be loyal to such Americanism, first and last.

Throwing off the European political custom of relying on master-leader-
ship which they believed to be dangerous to human freedom, Americans long
ago P ’fitted themselves individually for self-government, That system worked
well before the 20th Century Jewish Invasion.

Remember, from the President down, the men we elect to o ficei do.no
become our musters, but our servants. In time of peril, citizens must show their

patriotism by honest public criticism of their official servants.

The head of our present national political administration has admittedly
broken most of the pledges of the Democratic Party Platform on which he was
elected. He is therefore not a party Democrat.

He has taken and used powers belonging to Congress and the courts in
time of peace, thereby violating his oath to protect defend and
Constitution. He has tried to sovietize American industry by an illegal NRA
and American farmers through the triple A His admmistranon has become
widely known as "The Jew Deal.” He is therefore not an American.

Above all let us present a united front against the enemy. His defense is
a false front. He admits it by calling his real resistance "tissue paper against a

united Americanism. But he works while you sleep. He sows the seeds of sus¬
picion,, jealousy and hatred, His safety lies in keeping us quarrelsome, confused
and divided. Banish all differences until this great fight is won. We have but
one enemy—Jewry.

Whether or not you were born here, if you believe in and are loyal to
America's Great Principle of Individual Freedom, this is your country. Don’t
forget that our forefathers came from the conquering pioneer men of Europe.
They settled this land. They built this nation. It's ours! We are going to keep
it and run it. No Horde of Asiatic Pirates is going to take it from us!

It is rime to think straight American, to speak plain American, to act
direct American.

JEW-STAR ON U. S. ARMY HELMETS

Below is copy of an open self-explanatory letter from Edmondson:

Gen. Maiin Craig,

Chief of Staff, U. S. A., New York, Dec. 10, 1935

Washington, D. C,

Dear Sir:

The Recruiting Publicity Bureau of the United States Army on Governor’s
Island is distributing 38 x 25 recruiting posters. At the top in the right corner
thereof appears a picture of five American soldiers lying among brush aiming
rifles, with the order printed below: "Fire at will!" SIX-POINT STARS ARE
SHOWN ON THEIR HELMETS.

From the Recruiting Publicity Bureau the undersigned obtained a copy of
"Recruiting News" of August 1 5, 1933, issued by the Adjutant General of the
United States Army, on page 3 of which the following information is printed
around a six-point star:

"The original insignia of the Sixth Division of the American Expedition¬
ary Forces was A WHITE CROSS surmounting a White Circle. AFTER the
Armistice m 1918, a RED SIX-POINT STAR was officially substituted for
this symbol."

This six-point interlaced double-triangle has been the "possession symbol"
of International Jewry for centuries. It may be seen today on synagogues; on
Jewish-Masonic emblems; on documents of the Jewish-controlled British
Government; on Jew-owned public buildings in New York; ON MEDALS
CARRYING ON ONE SIDE THE FACE OF PRESIDENT FRANKLIN
D. ROOSEVELT—'On the other the said Jewish .star. And recently, this six-
point star HAS BEEN IMPRINTED ON UNITED STATES POST OFFICE
ENVELOPES FROM THE DEAD-LETTER DIVISION.

In the Name of The Republic, the undersigned native American loyal
citizen and his associatees hereby patriotically demand the restoration to the
Sixth Division of The White Cross insignia—symbol of our overwhelmingly
CHRISTIAN country —in place of the six-point alien star, an Oriental anti-
Christian and un-American emblem.

Yours for America FIRST,

Sc

4 8

"KEEP CHRISTMAS OUT OF PUBLIC SCHOOLS!"

(From Edmondson broadcast of Dec. 19, 1935)

The following quotation from the New York Jewish newspaper, "The
Dav,” of Dec, 14, 1933, printed in English below the above caption, speaks
for" itself in no uncertain arrogancy, and is particularly interesting at Christmas
Time:

"With the approach of Christmas we begin to be wary of religious prop¬
aganda disguised as music and cultural entertainment. WE WANT ALL THIS
CHRISTMAS PROPAGANDA STOPPED—leave the public schools alone!

"Some Jews 'falling’ for the Christmas slogan: 'Good Will to All Men,
pretend not to see in Christmas a distinctly 7 Christian Holiday but a sort ol
folk festival common to all in the United Slates. That they are thoroughly
mistaken, goes without saying.

"The masses of Jewish people in America HAVE A RIGHT TO DE¬
MAND from the educational svstem of the United States that IT KEEP
CHRISTMAS OUT OF THE PUBLIC SCHOOLS—and now is the time to
place this demand before public officials.

"PUBLIC SCHOOLS MUST BE KEPT CLEAR OF CHRISTMAS
CAROLS AND OTHER CHRISTMAS INFLUENCE. THE EDUCATIONAL
SYSTEM OF NEW YORK CITY—AND OTHER CITIES WITH LARGE
JEWISH POPULATIONS—PLEASE TAKE NOTICE!"

"This is a CHRISTIAN NATION," is an extract from the "Holy Trinity"
Case decision by the U. S. Supreme Court, per fustice Brewer, FEB. 29, 1892,
143 U. S. 457.

Chief justice Kent of the N. Y. Supreme Court said in "The People vs.
Ruggles, 8 Johns, 225, p. 227, 228—1811": "The majority of the people ol
this state, in common with the people of this country, profess the general doc¬
trines of CHRISTIANITY, as the rule of their faith and practice."

The last paragraph of the Constitution of the United States reads. "Done
in convention by the unanimous consent of the states present the 17th Day ol
September, in the year of OUR LORD (Jesus Christ), 1787, and of the In¬
dependence of the U. S. A., the 12th."

1932 AGENDA

Three resort owners in upstate New York have been haled to court by the
American Jewish Congress for displaying a sign "Church Nearby” without
another saying the same thing about "synagogue," charging violation of the
N. Y. State FEPC anti-Discrimination Law forbidding advertising along the
lines of race, color or religion. (N. Y. Jewish Examiner of Dec. 5, 195 2)

Isn’t that N. Y. State law a violation of the personal privilege right which
repealed the unconstitutional Prohibition Amendment?

AN AWFUL CONFESSION

Tudging from a twenty-year experience, most Jews cannot live in the rare¬
fied atmosphere of simple Christianity, and apparently, in obedience to a
mysterious emotional or sadistic paranoic complex, seek to drag everything
down to a materialistic level—in line with the following jeremiad written by
their Poet Leader Israel Zangwill, in "Israel," published on Page 131, in the
book "Blind Children":

'ISRAEL

“Pious, fanatical zealots, throttled by Talmud-coil;

“Impious, lecherous skeptics, cynical stalkers of Spoil;

“Wedded ’neath Hebrew awning, buried ’neath Hebrew sod;

“Between, nor a dream of Duty, never a glimpse of God;

“Blarneying, shivering, crawling, taking all Colors but None:

“Lying a fox in the covert, leaping an ape in the Sun!”

COMMENT ON ZANGWILL “POEM”

That is the most dreadful indictment ever published according to the
criterions of piercing penetration, merciless dissection, derisive mockery and
excoriating sadistic cruelty.

Surely it must have been soul-searing surgery for the author, a Jew thus
to so contemptuously hold up before the world the horrific picture of his own
people’s humiliating degradation.

After analyzing, the impartial spectator stands aghast at the ail-engulfing
tragedy of it all, while the wells of pure pity drain dry in pre-viewing the
inevitable mass-reckoning foreshadowed by the evolutionary principle of com¬
pensatory-retribution .

This writer has not found in secular or biblical history any parallel ar¬
raignment outside of the Divine Denunciation (minus sadism) which, in
company with that other curse in John S:44, has come thundering down the
centuries, which condemnation began with the phrase "WOE unto you Scribes
and Pharisees,” as recorded in New Testament, Matthew, Chapters 15, 16 , 21,
23 —wherein, incidentally, reference is made to “Blind Guides,” which might
indirectly have been responsible for Zangwill’s Title "Blind Children."

And, judging from the past and the present, in view of this and biblical
Jeremiads, dare any man challenge the historic accusation: "The Same, Yester¬
day, Today—Tomorrow”?

I sincerely hope that frequent use of the “language of vigor” in exposure
of Jewish anti-Americanism, may arouse victimized Jewry to tribal revolt
against and emancipation from the false leadership that is destroying them as
well as shaking civilization’s foundations.

DESTINY CALLS DICKINSON!

In response to a request for support of Senator L. J. Dickinson of Iowa as candi¬
date for the Presidency of the United States in May, 1936, Editor Edmondson replied
that if the senator would broadcast “A New Proclamation of Emancipation" as outlined
below, support would be forthcoming from many quarters. This was published on
May 26 :

My Fellow-Countrymen!

I have a high duty to perform. Our Immorcal Lincoln has said: "Have faith in the
people—TELL THEM THE TRUTH!" Believing that ONLY rhe Truth will set us FREE
from our present oppression, at the risk of all I hold dear I hereby broadcast the truth,
the whole truth and nothing but the truth,

The existence of this Republic is menaced by a world conspiracy. By the monopoly
of international gold-flow through a foreign-devised monetary system, a hidden inter¬
national financial super-power controls the political and economic destinies of our country.

By secret money corruptions, the freedom of communication between our citizens
has been destroyed. WE NO LONGER HAVE A FREE PRESS. At the source in great
metropolitan centers and through distributing agencies, news vital to the welfare of the
nation is deliberately suppressed by (1) advertising influence, (2) financial necessities,
(3) political manipulation and (4) alien ownership. Even the air is subsidized. America’s
first line of defense—the avenues of information—is down. The people are blinded. The
Supreme Court and the Constitution are undermined by propaganda, and the very existence
of the Republic is at stake!

ONLY by a free and public exchange of news and views can Government of, by and
for the Majority, be carried on. The primary issue before us today is neither the Consti-

50

, fiotl n0r the Supreme Court—IT IS FREEDOM TO PRINT AND BROADCAST ALL
THE NEWS With Freedom of Press, the Constitution is defended! With Freedom ol
Press, the Supreme Court is preserved! With Freedom of Press, the Republic is saved.

I charge Franklin D. Roosevelt with being the forefront of this conspiracy in Amer-
• a I accuse him of giving aid and comfort to our alien enemies through his Jewish-
Radical administration. I believe him to be guilty of treason to the Republic. He has
Grounded himself with a Supreme Council of alien-minded Jews, led by Karl Marx
Professor Frankfurter, International Banker Morgenthau, Wall Street Speculator Baruch,
7ionist "Elder" Brandeis, Socialist Filene and other prominent leaders of that minority,
and he has appointed thousands of Jews to key-controls throughout the entire Government.

He has not fulfilled pre-election pledges. He was elected under false pretenses.
Tn the language of the Declaration of Independence, by his bureaucracy, “He has erected a
multitude of new offices, and set swarms of officers to harrass our people and eat out
our" substance." Through his Jewish-Radical Advisory Council, "He has combined with
others to subject its to a jurisdiction foreign to our Constitution and unacknowledged by
our laws." By his AAA processing and other attempted confiscatory levies "He has im¬
posed taxes on us without our consent”—raising our national debt to record high levels.
Through thousands of Communistic strike revolts for high power and not for justice, "He
has incited domestic insurrections among us.” And he has blocked economic recovery by
impossible wholesale reforms.

■'It is evident that Roosevelt is not the leader of the forces behind him. He is being
used by them.” Such was the judgment of journalist Walter Lippman, in the N. Y.
Evening Post of June 26 , 1952. in commenting upon Democracy National Convention
developments.

To use the concluding language of the Declaration of Independence: "When a long
train of abuses and usurpations evince a design to reduce them jo absolute despotism it
is the people's right, it is their duiy to throw off such government.”

What is this international conspiracy!' you ask. Who is behind it? What is its
object? I will tell you the truth.

We first knew it by the name of "New Deal.” It is centuries old. It has paraded
under many disguises down the corridor of time. It promoted French revolutions, It con¬
quered Russia by bloody betrayal. It overcame Germany. It helped to finance the Spanish
revolution. In our own land, by many subversions, it has finally exposed its Internationa,
revolutionary character, shaking the Communist fist of civil war.

But Communism is not its real nature. Communism is an impossible atheistic doc¬
trine founded on the evil theory that "might makes right!” It is a diabolical philosophy
of gross materialism. And it is AN EFFECT. The Cause of Communism is an ancient
fantastic ambition lusting for universal power.

The source of Communism is the deadly enemy of Civilization. It especially covets
rich Christian America. UNDER ITS RULE INDIVIDUAL ECONOMIC SECURITY
WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE.

False Jewish Leadership

THIS WORLD ENEMY NO. 1 IS THE FALSE LEADERSHIP OF INTER¬
NATIONAL JEWRY.

In this connection I call your attention to che significant Los Angeles defi-speech on
Oct ioa 5 b v Agricultural "Commissar” Tugwell. who declared that the New Deal

"movement will go on in any case. IT LIES IN THE BRAINS AND BLOOD OF A
PEOPLE BRINGING INTO SUBSTANCE THE STUFF OF OLD RACIAL DREAMS.

In the light of what follows, 1 leave it to your imagination as to whether or not
those "Old Racial Dreams" of super-dominion are associated with a Jewish fanatic
ambition to govern the world spurred on by a selfish legendary complex.

PROOF OF PLOT FROM "OLD RACIAL” RECORDS

"Jewish elements provide the driving power for both Capftalism and Communism,
We Jew's have grievously erred. We who invented the chosen people myth, and who have
posed as having given to the world its Savior, are nothing but its seducers, its incen¬
diaries its destroyers. We, who promised to lead you to a New Heaven, have led you
into a New Hell.” Those damning words were written by a London Jewish Savant,. Dr.
Oscar Levy—afterward exiled—in a preface to the book, 'The World Significance of the
Russian Revolution,” by George Pitt-Rivers in 1920.

"There is a Jewish conspiracy against all nations. It occupies everywhere the
avenues of power—the double assault of Jewish Revolution 2 nd Jewish Finance.” That
is from the pen of Jewish Author Rene Groos. as quoted on June 15, 1929, in a French
weekly called “La Vieilk France,”

"When we Jews sink we become a revolutionary proletariat (Communistic). When
we rise, there arises our terrible power of the purse (Capitalistic)." Thus wrote Theodor
Herzl, European Zionist Leader, in his book, "The Jewish State."

"The Talmud, the Rabbis' Bible, is the very soul of the Jew. He was taught early
to find his chief happiness in the possession of money. They became Lords of money,
and Lords of the World." That is from Werner Sombart's suppressed book, "Jews &
Modern Capitalism,” (1913).

Note this: "What Jewish idealism and Jewish discontent so powerfully contributed
to produce in Russia, the same historic qualities of the Jewish mind are tending to pro¬
mote IN OTHER COUNTRIES. The Jew evolved organized capitalism, with its working
instrumentality, the banking system."—This from The American Hebrew, Sept. 20, 1920.
(Paul M. Warburg was "Father" of the Federal Reserve System.)

"The Revolutionary Administration which directed the Communist Conquest of
Russia was composed of 545 men, 447 of whom were Jews," wrote Victor Marsden (in
December, 1918), for many years Correspondent in Russia for The London Morning
Post—naming as leaders Trotsky, Apfdbaum, Rykoff, Radek and other Jews.

"We intend to remake the Gentile—what the Communists are doing in Russia," says
Rabbi lewis Browne in his book, "How Odd of God." "Fundamentally, Judaism is anti-
Christian," said the London Jewish World of March 15, 1923.

"The League of Nations is a Jewish conception,” wrote Jewish Author Israel Zang-
will in the London Jewish "Guardian" of June 11, 1920; while Zionist Leader Sokolov-
toasted. "We Jews established it after a fight of 25 years." (N. Y. Times of Aug.
28,1922.)

In the shadow of those immortal documents, the Declaration of Independence and
the Constitution of the United States, I hereby declare chat I am not opposed to Jews
as Tews. as to their Race or as to their Religion; but I am unalterably againsr that Jewish
anti-Americanism which, directed by false leadership, IS DESTROYING THE REPUBLIC.

With the help of Divine Providence and your aid, if you elect me to the Presidency
with a mandate to smash this deadly alien conspiracy against our beloved country, to that
great reconstructive end I solemnly consecrate "my life, my fortune and my sacred
honor.”

N. Y. GAG LAW PROPOSED BY JEWS
(From a Jan. 20, 1936, Edmondson bulletin)

Cunningly designed to abolish free speech, press, radio and assembly in New York
State, the text of Senate Bill 165, introduced Jan. 9, 1936, by Jewish Senator Schwartz-
wald’of Brooklyn, a strengthened DUPLICATE of the law enacted on April S, 1935, in
New Jersey, reads as below:

"Section 1; Any person who shall print, write, multigraph, or In ANY MANNER
WHATSOEVER, make or produce or by any means set out or make legible in any
language:

"(a) ANY BOOK, speech, statement, circular or pamphlet which, in ANY WAY,
in any pare thereof, incites, counsels, PROMOTES or advocates hatred, violence or HOS¬
TILITY against any group or groups of persons residing or BEING in this STATE, by
reason of RACE, color, religion or MANNER of worship;

(Interpretative Comment: "Ariy Book” must include the New Testament, Christian
Bible, in which Christ is quoted in John 8:44 as denouncing the Jews: "Ye are of your
father, the Devil. The Truth is not in you.” "Any article" must include newspaper items
printing "Shylocks" over names of Jewish criminal usurers.)

"(b) Any constitution, by-laws, rules, regulations or record of any proceedings of
ANY ORGANIZATION, association, corporation, society, order, club or MEETING OF
THREE or more persons, which in ANY way incites, counsels, PROMOTES or advo¬
cates hatred, violence or HOSTILITY * * * by reason of RACE, color, religion or
MANNER of worship;

("Any organization" must include churches, whose preachers frequently quote the
Old Testament Bible, in which this appears, Kings 11:32: "Jehovah turned not from his
fierce wrath against Judah, saying, 'I shall remove Judah out of my sight.’ ”

'(c) Any PICTURE, photograph, emblem, representation, sign or token, which in
ANY way incites, counsels, PROMOTES, advocates or symbolizes hatred, violence or
HOSTILITY * 15 by reason ‘of RACE, color, religion or MANNER of worship,
SHALL BE GUILTY OF A MISDEMEANOR;

("Any picture" must include one of "Christ Crucified" by the Jews. "Any sign" must
include the Cross, of which the Swastika is a form,)

s

■«

S

*

■5

I

)=

*«il

i?

I

► i

Si

%

c*

'&r

}h

. d

i

f

<

k

5 2

:.S

"Section 2: Any person who shall HAVE IN HIS POSSESSION, for the purpose or
WITH INTENT to utter, sell, give away, circulate, distribute or exhibit to the view of
ANOTHER, or any person who shall utter, sell, give away, circulate, send, transmit,
distribute or exhibit to the view of another ;

("Having in possession" must include a newspaper containing an item unfavorable
to Jewish aims, and a Jewish Judge may decide whether or not there was "intent" to
"incite,”)

"(a) Any book, speech, article, statement, circular, pamphlet or other written, printed
or multigraphed matter, made or produced in ANY MANNER WHATSOEVER, in anv
language or by ANY means set out and made legible which in ANY way in any part
thereof, incites, counsels. PROMOTES or advocates hatred, violence or HOSTILITY, etc.;

("Any book" must also include the Congressional Record, in which Congressman
Hamilton Fish reported that a "large percentage of known Communist district organizers
are of Jewish Origin''; and in which Former Congressman McFadden said: "The U. S.
should not permit the Jewish International Bankers to drive it into another war.” Also the
"Red Network," which lists 350 Jews as undesirable radicals.)

"(b) Any constitution, by-laws, rules, regulations of records of any proceeding or
PURPORTING to be such, or any organization, association, corporation, society, ordeh
club or meeting of THREE or more persons, made or produced in any manner, or by any
means set out and made legible, in any language, which in ANY way or in any part
thereof, incites, counsels, PROMOTES or advocates hatred, violence or HOSTILITY, etc.

"(c) Any PICTURE, photograph, emblem, representation, sign or token made or
produced in ANY manner, which in ANY way incites, counsels, PROMOTES or advo¬
cates hatred, violence or HOSTILITY, etc.;

("Any emblem" must include the Cross embodying a crucified Christ worn by
church officials. "Any picture” would include a hook-nose cartoon, holding Jews up to
ridicule-hostility.)

"Section 3: Any person who shall EXHIBIT or display at any meeting of three or
more persons or in any parade, public or PRIVATE, or in any public place, ANY FLAG,
banner, emblem, picture, photograph, representation, tableau, performance, sign or token,
which in ANY WAY incites, PROMOTES or advocates hatred, violence or HOSTILITY,
etc.;

("Any Performance” means a Christmas Tableau in church or public school.)

"Section 4: Any person who shall, in the presence of TWO or more persons, in any
language, make or utter ANY speech, statement or declaration, which in ANY way
incites, counsels, PROMOTES or advocates hatred, abuse, violence or HOSTILITY, etc.;

("Any speech" means constitutional free speech or discussions. It would be a crime
to name Frankfurter, Brandeis. Baruch, Morgemhau, Filene, Rabbi Wise. Trotsky, Karl
Marx, all Jews, in connection with Communism.)

"Section 5; Any owner, lessee, manager, agenr or other person who shall knowingly
let or hire out, or permit the use of any building, structure, auditorium, hall or room or
any part thereof, whether licensed or not, to or for the use of ANY organization, associa¬
tion. society, order, club, group or meeting of THREE or more persons, where it it pur¬
ported or INTENDED to hold ANY MEETING or ASSEMBLY of THREE or more
persons where at any provision or provisions of the four preceding paragraphs are to be
violated; and any person oc persons who shall knowingly hire any such building, struc¬
ture, auditorium, hall or room, or any part thereof, for the purpose of using or permitting
the same to be used by others, for the purpose of violating any provision or provisions of
the four preceding paragraphs hereof, SHALL BE GL r ILTY OF A MISDEMEANOR;

("Any Assembly” means denial of the constitutional right of free assemblage or
mass meeting to protest against a monopoly like the moving picture industry, Jew-
controlled.)

"Section 6: Any persons who shall from any station, studio, radio transmission equip¬
ment, microphone or any other equipment or device of ANY nature or kind, located
within this State, broadcast or make audible to others, within this State, through any radii:
receiving set. device or equipment of any nature or kmd, located within this State, in
any language, any speech, declaration, statement or PRONOUNCEMENT which in ANY
way incites, counsels, promotes or advocates hatred, violence or HOSTILITY SHALL Bn
GUILTY OF A MISDEMEANOR,

"Section 1: Anv persons, firm, corporation or association violating any provision of
this act shall be PUNISHABLE by a fine of not more than $5,000 nor less than $200,
or by IMPRISONMENT not exceeding THREE YEARS, nor less than NINETY DAYS,
or by such fine and imprisonment, in the discretion of the court.

For Governorship at the last general Stace election, LEHMAN headed the Demo¬
cratic ticket; MOSES the Republican, SOLOMON the Socialist; AMTER, the Communist.
AH Jews!

■'FORTUNE" FOR JEWISH MONOPOLY
(Edmondson February 3, 1936 publication)

The magazine "Fortune," in a February 1936 issue largely devoted to the
defense of Jewry, asks with familiar arrogance: "WHY SHOULDN’T THEY
MONOPOLIZE ANY PROFESSION OR INDUSTRY THEY ARE INTEL¬
LIGENT ENOUGH TO CAPTURE? WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT
MAKE IF JEWS RUN AWAY WITH THE SYSTEM?"

"It is not pleasant to have individuals like the REVEREND Gerald B.
Winrod of The Defenders of The CHRISTIAN FAITH' (of Wichita, Kan.) ;
or like Robert Edward Edmondson, WHO MANUFACTURES HATE in
New York City, invite the country to attack Jews.”

If the Patriotic Crusade against the Jewish anti-Americanism of the
Roosevelt Jewish-Radical Administration is so unimportant—as it argues while
soothing "suspicious tycoons"—why do prominent Jewish publications as
"The American Hebrew," "The New Masses," "The N. Y. World-Telegram,"
"Fortune" and other "kept men of the press," repeatedly devote so much
publicity to the Edmondson Americanism FIRST Campaign/

If to WARN fellow-countrymen against the CAUSE of the Communism
that murdered and enslaved Russia and is similarly trying to destroy American
Political, Economic and Spiritual Liberties;

If to EXPOSE to Patriotic JUSTICE the anti-national treason-conspiracy
of the false leadership of the greatest international blood-regimented parasitical-
solidarity the world has ever known;

If to turn the X-Ray of Truth on Minority Materialists once denounced by
AN AUTHORITY—than whom there is no higher—as "Sons of the Devil;’’

If THAT be "manufacturing hate," then I plead guilty to obeying the
Eligh Command to "Love Good and HATE EVIL," and await, supremely confi¬
dent, the verdict of an ENLIGHTENED AMERICA.

TUGWELL’S COMMUNISTIC RACIAL DREAM

The following is from February 8, 1936 Edmondson bulletin:

"Sudden Death," or "Oppose Roosevelt and Die," is the designation of a
startling and • impressively informative news-editorial published by the inde¬
pendent Highland Post of Ulster County. New York, under date of February
6 , 1936, in which the writer essays to answer the query: Whence the Curse?

This rather terrifying analysis, with relentless logic, takes apart the notori¬
ous Tugwell revolutionary speech delivered Oct. 28, 1935, in Los Angeles, and
exposes the horror lurking therein.

Note the Tugwell camouflaged key-phrases as X-rayed below:

"We are assisting OUR PEOPLE to place thcmselvc-s in the most
advantageous and permanently SECURE situations.

' The nation is witnessing the Death-struggle of industrial autocracy and
the birch of democratic discipline," declared Tugwell.

"We are establishing a farmer-worker alliance which will carry ail before
it. Our best strategy is to surge forward with the workers and the farmers,
trusting to the genius of OUR LEADER for the disposition of our forces and
the timing of our attacks.

"The movement will go on in any case. IT LIES IN THE BRAINS AND
BLOOD OF A PEOPLE BRINGING INTO SUBSTANCE THE STUFF
OF OLD RACIAL DREAMS.”

It is especially noteworthy that Tugweil repeatedly employs the phrase
'worker- farmer.” This is the precise expression continually used by the official
organ of the Communist Party, "The Daily Worker,” in urging civil war
combination of the two classes against the industrial and agricultural "kulaks."

Commenting on Tugwell's speech, Washington Correspondent Mark Sul¬
livan said in the N. Y. Herald Tribune on Nov. 16 , 1935: "Prof. Tugweil is
the REAL ANIMATING GENIUS of the New Deal. He is powerful in
astuteness; powerful in understanding how to bring about revolution. He has
studied it in Russia.’’

Is Tugweil Jewish?

"INCALCULABLE DAMAGE" TRIBUTE

I enjoyed a Californian’s illuminating report received about March 7,
1936, under the heading "A Real Tribute from the Jewish B'nai B’rith
Messenger" of Feb. 21, 1936, published in Los Angeles, reading:

"We should not dismiss Robert Edward Edmondson as a crackpot—
though there is no doubt he is just that. Scientifically, he is an obviously
dangerous paranoiac with a terrific persecution complex; bur of course nothing
will be done about it, and he will die a more or less peaceful death after
having done INCALCULABLE DAMAGE.”

Commenting publicly thereon. Editor Edmondson retorted: "Emanating
from a source for centuries mentally delusion-obsessed with a "Chosen People"
complex, and physically by thousands of years of inbreeding, the foregoing
might be considered a priceless tribute to selfless patriotic effort were it not
for the fact that such ingrained condition could be accurately diagnosed as
finally producing destructive madness that may have to be cured by drastic
mass-surgical operation. However, the enemies of The Republic at last seem to
know that they are in a real fight.”

1200 BILLION DOLLAR PALESTINE STEAL

The above is heading placed over an Edmondson bulletin of March 19,
1936, reporting the receipt of "A Constitutional Crisis” proclamation issued by
the British National League, prophetically describing the current Middle East
Moslem revolutionary unrest as a result of Palestine Zionist Jewish State plans:

The proclamation reads:

"Unless we act to right the wrong situation in policy the Arabs of
Palestine are doomed to increasing martyrdom, which in the end would arouse
the whole Arab and Indian Moslem Worlds.

"Past British Governments through weakness in principle and action
upon it * * * have unfortunately given the Dead Sea and Ruterberg Concessions
into the hands of International Financiers. Mr. Felix Warburg, from whose
group we borrowed the America Debt, is one of the powerful group of Inter¬
national Financiers at the center of the Dead Sea Concession, which is in a

foreign and mainly Jewish Control. At a great gathering in New York, Dr.
Chaim Weizmann (Zionist Leader), stated in a public speech: 'The key to the
doors of Palestine is in the pocket of the Jews of America.’

"The money values of the Dead Sea products have been estimated to be
approximately 240 billion pounds sterling, including Potash, Bromine, Salt
NaCI., Gypsum and Magnesium Chloride. In addition. Prof. Georges Claud
estimates chat gold in solution in the Dead Sea amounts to a value of five
billion pounds sterling, and it can be extracted easily and economically.

“There is extreme danger in Great Britain in failing to handle the moral
issues. The future of our own country and Palestine is most urgently at stake,
as well as the future of the Arabs and the Indian Muslims in relation to us.

"Moslem opinion has been expressed in an historic cable from the All-
India Moslem Conference, representing 72 million Moslems, as follows: 'The
Moslems of India cannot tolerate Jewish Monopolies being created, which
would soon make the proposed Jewish Home a purely Jewish State—as the
Zionists clearly desire to establish in Palestine/

"Foreign control of the Dead Sea means the World Economic Domination
of International (Jewish) Finance, raising the gravest issues for Anglo-Saxon
Civilization."

(Signed) "National League,

"M. Farquharson, President."

JEWISH MINORITY THREATENS!

The above captioned Edmondson bulletin of April 15, 1936, as below:

“The jews of America, because of their NUMBERS, INTEREST and
ABILITY, constitute A GREAT POLITICAL FORCE. They have not usurped
this power; IT BELONGS TO THEM AS Of RIGHT! They are going to
exercise it AS THEY SEE FIT! What are YOU going to DO about it?"—
From an editorial of April 9, 1936, in the gFeat Yiddish Daily, “THE DAY,”
of New York City, edited by Rabbi Samuel Margoshes.

And this is HOW they USE their "great political force;”

The Daily Worker of New York, Dec. 17, 1938, published the following
damning confession: "As an expression of the fraternal relations exisiting
between The Morning Freiheit, JEWISH language daily paper, and The Daily
Worker, official organ of the COMMUNIST Party, the office staff of The
Freiheit today presented WILLIAM BROWDER, N* Y. State Treasurer of The
COMMUNIST Party, with a check representing their collective contribution of
a day’s pay. The money is to be used to help strengthen The Daily Worker,
and SUPPORT it for the coming year. 'The SPIRIT accompanying this check is
even more important than the money itself’ said Browder, in accepting the gift.”

The Jews of America 'number' about 4,228,000, (their official estimate)
presumably based, as in Bibical times, upon MALES ALONE—which would
give a total U. S. Jewish population of at least 8,500,000, or about a 7%
minority. Based on "Passover Bread" requirements, it has been estimated that
the Jews in America in 1920 numbered about 6,000,000—with 3,000,000 more
seeking entrance—over 15 Million reported in the United States now.

What are WE going to do about it?

THIS is the answer of the Middle-Class American Patriotic Majority to
the Jewish Minority:

56

The Republic of the United States of America was founded upon "A
Declaration of Independence” conceived, not by an oriental Jewish but by a
Christian Majority that, through supreme sacrifice, creared the greatest freedom
Constitution "ever struck off by the hand and brain of man,” and with it
established a nation that rose from poverty to enjoy prosperity and happiness—
until the advent of the revolutionary Jewish Invasion.

WE ARE GOING TO DEMONSTRATE OUR CONTROL of the
Destinies of the America bequeathed to us by our great Christian Forefathers,

In a renaissance of the "Spirit of ’76,'’ now rising, fighting under our
historic crusading-cry "Liberty or Death!" WE are going to RESTITUTION-
ALLY RECAPTURE what has been treacherously and predatorily seized
through secret subversion of our unsuspecting good-will, tolerance and hospi¬
tality—PEACEFULLY, if we CAN, but MILITANTLY, if we MUST!

TRUTH CALLED "ABSURD”

The following is a self-explanatory publication of April 22, 1946:

Under date of April 1 6 , 1936, Robert Edward Edmondson received the
following letter from Dean Virginia C. Gildersleeve of Barnard College,
Columbia University, New York City:

"As a good American, I wish to express my indignation at the un-
American methods of propaganda which you are following in the absurd
document entitled, ’U. S. Invisible Government.’ This reached me through the
mails on Monday,

"Great barm is being done by you- and other persons who in this un-
American manner are trying to stir up racial and religious prejudice and
passion, hatred and fear, in the minds of the ignorant.

"It would, of course, seem to me entirely proper for you to attack the acts
or policies of any of the persons whom you enumerate; but merely to imply
that they are radicals, Reds and Jews seems to me scandalous.

"If Frances Perkins and Judge Cardozo belong in your list of Moscow
Reds, I hope that I, too, am entitled to a position there. Let me add that my
descent is American for over 250 years on both sides of my family/ and that,
so far as I know, I have not a drop of Jewish or Russian blood in my veins—
though what difference this would make, I do not know."

The following reply was sent to Miss Gildersleeve by Robert Edward
Edmondson under date of April 22, 1936:

"I welcome your letter of April 16, 1936, gratuitously attacking, under
the self-styled title 'A Good American,’ what you assume to characterize as
my ’un-American methods of propaganda,’ exemplified in a public document
exposing the Jewish anti-Americanism of what has come to be signficantly
known in every state by the various political appellations of ’The Roosevelt
Red Deal,’ 'The New Steal,’ 'The Raw Deal,' and ’The Communistic Jew Deal.’

"Since you have 'indignantly' expressed yourself frankly, you will not deny
me the same privilege.

"In order to complete the American background picture you draw' with
Regard to yourself, may I also lay before you the fact of my own Colonial
ancestry that geneologists say extends beyond pre-Revolution days back to Robert
of Scotland in the year 800 A.D.—which ought to dispose of any predilection
for doctrines other than Anglo-Saxon—likely to be unfavorably inferred from
your insinuation as to propaganda,’ whose original meaning is to 'educate.’

"Further comparative background is provided by the fact that you, as
Dean of Barnard College of the New York University—now notoriously known
among patriots as 'Columbia, the Germ of the Nation because of its un-
American internationalism-—at present hold a highly lucrative professional post,
as against my position, namely, that of a $ 5 Q, 0 G 0 -a-year executive who has
given up his regular business to unselfishly devote ail his time, money and
ability to a crusade whose aim is the liberation of America from an alien
politico-economic-publicity subversion, of which you are apparently without
knowledge notwithstanding the fact that your exceptional educational key-
status should have fully acquainted you with the overwhelming documentary-
evidence thereof.

"Now that our respective foundations have been established, may I proceed
to analyze your denunciations seriatim?

"The 'Invisible Government' document (not sent to you from this office),
to which you have taken belated exception—since it was first published in May,
1934, and revised in June, 1935—is attacked by you as 'absurd.' The New
Webster International Dictionary meaning of 'absurd' is: 'Contrary to reason,
inconsistent with common sense, opposed to manifest truth.’ The said docu¬
ment is subheaded 'The Roosevelt Internationalist Minority Advisory Council
at Washington,’ under which appears an 'incomplete list of many unofficial and
official powers behind Roosevelt Leadership, all apparently under Brandeis-
Frankfurter-Morgenthau Jewish-Radical Minority influence—descriptions being
taken from Jewish publications, the famous Dilling "Red Network” book,
Congressional, Associated Press and other published records.' Surrounding a
circle in which are the words 'Roosevelt Personal Government, is arranged the
following names, with title as supplied by the Brooklyn Jewish Examiner of
Oct. 20, 1933, wherein it was stated: 'The Roosevelt Administration has
selected more Jews to fill influential positions than any previous administration
in American history; including Bernard M. Baruch, Unofficial President;
Prof. Felix Frankfurter, Legal Advisor; Herbert Feis, Brains of the State Dept,;
Henry Morgenthau, International Banker; Samuel Rosenman, Roosevelt's 'Right
Arm,’ and Justice’ Brandeis, 'New Deal Father,’ who is designated by the
N. Y .Times of January 28, 1934, as philosopher of the New Deal, whose
NRA, 'is almost a composite of his dissenting opinions.'

"And is it possible that you did not read in the Saturday Evening Post of
Oct. 26, 1935, the confession by General Johnson thac Prof. Frankfurter is
THE MOST INFLUENTIAL SINGLE INDIVIDUAL IN THE UNITED
STATES,' owing to his 'invisible' power with the President. 'Frankfurter is
the legal master-mind of the New Deal,’ say Simon & Schuster in their 1954
book, The New Dealers.'

"I could go on almost indefinitely, quoting overwhelming evidence as to
the 'reasonableness, common sense and truth' of this startling portrayal, which
you so lightly brush aside as 'absurd.'

"Your implication that I am fanatically 'trying to stir up racial and
religious prejudice and passion, hatred and fear’ has a most familiar ring—
representing a typical 'canned product’ from a master factory, and being almost
invariably used by. Jewish Communist denunciators of all patriotic activities.
As a matter of fact, among others, James P. Warburg, representative Jew,
personally admitted to me in 1934 that religion does not enter into the Jew-
Gentile controversy. I know of no American action against the religion of

Judaism, although, with other citizens, 1 strongly object to political religionists
of any faith, meddling in governmental affairs, since our American philosophy
properly contemplates complete separation of church and state.

"Being typical internationalists, constituting an imperium in imperio in all
nations, to me, Jews have no legitmate claim to specific racial status, although
they may have originally belonged to the Semites, of which 'race' Arabs an^
other peoples are also members.

"This Jewish Problem is largely economic because history shows that
Jewry as a whole is predatorially materialistic, and self-confessedly so in view
of writcen expressions of their own authorities. Zionist Leader Herzl admits in
his book, 'The Jewish State’—'When we Jews sink, we become a revolutionary
proletariat; when w»e rise, there also arises our terrible power of the purse. Dr.
Oscar Levy deprecatingly wrote in 1920: 'Jewish elements provide rhe driving
force for both Capitalism and Communism.’ The logic of modern events proves
the accuracy of this economic thesis.

"You object to the listing of Justice Cardozo among radicals. Can you
deny that he has always voted in important New Deal Supreme Court decisions
with 'Radical’ Justice Brandeis? ’By their deeds shall ye know them!

"Not being a churchman, I cannot be rightfully accused of religious
fanaticism- but Secretary of Labor Perkins, who says she is a Christian, yet
would be proud of Jewish biood did she have it, has largely surrounded herself
with alien-minded and foreign-born Jewish Radical associates in place of citizens
loyal to the Christian-American ideals of Washington, Jefferson and Lincoln
and thereby brands herself not only as un-American, but as unfaithful to her
professed religion. It is of course your privilege to align yourself with Mr.
Cardozo and Miss Perkins.

"I agree with you that 'great harm’ has been done—to the enemies of the
Republic—by the Edmondson pro-American Crusade. There is also emphatic
agreement on this point by the Los Angeles B nai B rith Messenger, organ
of the Jewish Kehillah, when it admits in its Feb. 21, 1936, issue that this
patriotic movement has done ’incalculable damage.

"My documentary record of a desperate two-year selfless attempt to peace¬
fully enlighten deliberately blinded fellow-countrymen to the peril of civil
war hidden in this Jewish Communism, challenges vour charge of 'un-American
stirring up' of strife. I will say to you thac I consider any sacrifice justified,
to redeem Washington and Lincoln’s Republican Government.

"And the instantaneous welcome accorded the five million Pamphlets of
Truth I have fortunately been instrumental in getting circulated from coast to
coast, makes me supremely confident that I am not alone in that sentiment, or
as to the correctness of my thesis and policy as to the Jewish anti-Americanism
which is destroying the Republic.

"Many religious and other teachers seem to have been theoretically edu¬
cated beyond their intellectual capacity to grasp and understand the practical
realities' of the current super-crisis.

"To close, I will quote from a letter of May 11, 1934, answering Mr.
Louis A. Freedman, N. Y. Citv, wherein I declared: 'Any minority seeking to
rule the American majority will fail. In defence of Americanism, I would take
exactly the same militant position were the present subversive Jewish influence
exercised by a German. Irish, Russian or any racial, religious or other minority

59

group. YOUR concern is for die 5,000,000 Jews in the United States—MINE
is for 125,000,000 citizens, including the Jewish minority. Which is TRUE
Americanism?’

Miss Gildersleeve replied April 23 to the above letter thus: "Thank you for
printing my letter. I had thought of sending it to the newspapers. One always
feels relieved at getting a protest of this sort off one’s mind.’'

This is typical and confirmatory, namely; unable to make successful re¬
buttal, minds "theoretically educated beyond their intellectual capacity to grasp
realities." either reply "I don’t agree." or by diversion, silently disregard un¬
answerable direct logic supported by overwhelming evidence, fact and authority;
but "you can’t dodge the consequence of dodging your responsibility."

ECONOMIC MASTER-MIND BARUCH

From May 1, 1936 Edmondson bulletin:

"More than any other one person, Prof. Frankfurter is the legal master¬
mind of' the New Deal."—Simon-Schuster in the 1934 "New Dealers."

Who is the "Economic Master-Mind” of the New Deal? See below:

"One of the key Roosevelt advisors is Bernard M. Baruch, a power in the
Wilson Administration. In the absence of Secretary of State Hull and the
President from Washington, Mr. Baruch is regarded as "Unofficial President."
—Brooklyn Jewish Examiner of Oct. 20, 1933-

"When President Wilson went to Paris to draw up the Peace Treaty,
Bernard M. Baruch went with him and served as the war-time President’s
Economic Advisor."—Boston Daily Globe of June 20, 1933.

In the 1934 book "Are These Things $ 0 ?" appears this: Wilson's best
friend was Bernard M. Baruch, who, heading a batch of 117 Jews, accompanied
Wilson on his trip to the Peace Conference. He is listed in "Who’s Who in
America" as "Economic Advisor to the American Peace Commission."

"Bernard M. Baruch is called into frequent conferences with the President.
He has financed many a Congressional campaign; and is surrounded by a
praetorian guard of Senators, who hang on his every word. The figure of
Baruch is swelling into enormous dimensions on the horizon of public life. He
has been given Credit for Hoover's appointment of Eugene Meyer, Jr., as
Governor of the Federal Reserve Board. He is the Mystery Man of Washington
and Wall Street."—From 1933 October "Fortune."

On Page 13080 of the Congressional Record of June 27, 1934, Vol, 78,
No. 139, is printed:

"Following the World W 2 r Bernard M, Baruch appeared before a select
Congressional Committee and testified to the fact that he virtually had com¬
plete control of the resources of the American nation during the war, saying:
'I probably had more power than perhaps any other man did in the war.'

"THERE HAS NOT BEEN AN ADMINISTRATION SINCE OUR
ADVENT INTO THE GREAT WORLD WAR IN WHICH BARUCH
HAS NOT BEEN A CHIEF POLITICAL, ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL
ADVISOR, AND EVERY ADMINISTRATION THAT HAS LISTENED
TO HIM HAS CARRIED US DEEPER AND DEEPER INTO FINANCIAL
CHAOS."—Congressman L. T. McFadden of Penna.

60

The Associated Press on June 22, 1934, announced that Baruch was
moving out of Walk Street to write his memoirs, but quoted him as saying:
■‘I do not want anyone to think I am getting rusty and going to retire. I am
not, positively. I AM JUST WHAT I SAID I WAS—A SPECULATOR.”

Incidentally, Baruch was quoted on Sept. 25, 1935, by the Chicago Tribune
as saying: 'T believe national pride (patriotism) a lot of nonsense.

President Roosevelt unctuously denounced the speculators and money¬
changers’' of Wall Street.

WHY WAS HIS "CHIEF ECONOMIC ADVISOR" A SELF-CON¬
FESSED SPECULATOR, WHOM WALL STREET HAS ALWAYS RE¬
GARDED AS ONE OF ITS MOST PROMINENT STOCK MARKET
OPERATORS AND ASSOCIATE OF INTERNATIONAL BANKERS?

PROTESTANTISM WARNS JEWS OF "DRYING UP" TOLERANCE
(A Waking-up reprint published in a May 22, 1936 Edmondson Bulletin)

What is being called "the biggest Protestant news in many years," has just
made its appearance in the "Christian Century. The following are from the
April 29 and May 13, 1936, issues:

"Most non-Jewish Americans know' little of the aspirations of the Jew.
When they learn, their complacency in present ignorance is likely to be
GREATLY DISTURBED.

"Jewry is a mutual benefit organization; it is also a propagandist organiza¬
tion. The Jewish System violates the safeguards which can alone justify the
continuance of factional groups in any democratic society. A democratic society
is peculiarly sensitive to violation of its sacred unities. There can be no unity;
nor can there be social bealch in the American community, so long as any group
invokes the holy sanctions of religion, and the inviolable solidarity of national
life, in the perpetuation of permanent and IRRECONCILABLE FACTION-
ALISM.

"The time for realistic discussion cannot be indefinitely postponed. The
tension between Jew's and Christians cannot be effectively resolved by appeal to
the sentiment of mutual tolerance. In a problem of this kind, tolerance operates
in a one-way street. It is exercised by the majority, not by the minoricy.

"American Society is an organism, and, as such, all its vital forces tend
toward SOLIDARITY, UNITY', INTEGRATION. Any unassimiiated element
of the population is bound to have trouble, BECAUSE IT IS BOUND TO
MAKE TROUBLE.

"If the Christian Community were once convinced that an impassable gulf
is fixed between itself and the Jewish Community, ITS SPIRIT OF TOLER¬
ANCE WOULD SHRIVEL UP. TOLERANCE CANNOT LIVE WITH
DESPAIR.

"The Jew will never command the respect of the non-Jewish culture in
which he lives so long as HE HUDDLES BY HIMSELF, nursing his own
'uniqueness,' cherishing his tradition as something precious to him but which
cannot be conveyed to others, nor participated in by others.

"The Christian World would like to know what specific values Judaism
has to contribute to civilization which Christianity does not likewise possess.
A Judaism which talks of its uniqueness and is unwilling to take 'pot-luck'
with humanity by offering its treasures to the rest of mankind, cannot escape
the SUSPICION that it is hoarding its treasure for A SELFISH PURPOSE,"

61

(1937 Addenda)

"JEWRY, THE PRO.TYPE OF NAZISM"

The following is a sequel reprint from an editorial in the Christian Century
magazine of Chicago of June 9, 1937, pages 734-5-6:

"What is the Jewish Problem? Jewry is a racial minority which conceives
its racial integrity as the permanent basis of a distinctive culture, * * * They
are an hereditary group, * * * Can democracy suffer an hereditary minority to
perpetuate itself as a permanent minority?

"The simple and naked fact is that Judaism rests upon an impossible basis.
IT IS TRYING TO PLUCK THE FRUITS OF DEMOCRACY WITHOUT
YIELDING ITSELF TO THE PROCESSES OF DEMOCRACY.

"Conceding without reserve that our Jewish brethren have the right to their
faith and to the practice of it in whatever forms are seemlv and precious to
them, we are bound to say that THEY HAVE NO RIGHT IN A DEMOCRACY
to remove their faith from the normal influences of the democratic process by
insulating it behind the walls of a racial and cultural solidarity; and we are
further bound to sav that DEMOCRACY CANNOT GUARANTEE OUR
JEWISH BRETHREN AGAINST THE EMERGENCE OF A CRISIS IN
WHICH THE PREJUDICE AND ANGER GENERATED BY THEIR LONG
RESISTANCE TO THE DEMOCRATIC PROCESS WILL FLAME UP TO
THEIR GREAT HURT.

"The situation in which the Jewish Problem arises is in large measure
Jewry’s own creation, * * * We hold that the Jew is responsible, in a high
degree, and that no solution of his problem is possible until his own degree
of responsibility is recognized. The first step toward its recognition is to
discern that his determination to maintan a permanent RACIAL STATUS
IS INCOMPATIBLE WITH DEMOCRACY,

"The root cause of the Jewish Problem is the Jew's immemorial and
pertinacious obsession with u.o illusion, the illusion that his race, his people,
are the object of the special favor of God, who requires the maintenance of
their racial integrity and separateness as the medium through which, soon or
late, will be performed some mighty act involving human destiny,

"FROM PRE-CHRISTIAN DAYS THE JEWS' BELIEF in their divinely
hallowed racial uniqueness provoked UNFAVORABLE REACTION. * * *
The Jewish Problem of today is rooted NOT CHIEFLY IN RELIGIOUS
SOIL, but in the soil of common human psychology.

"How can the vicious circle be broken by Jewish initiative? In only one
way, as it seems to us, namely, for prophets to arise in Judaism who will begin
to proclaim the terrible truth: That Judaism has been FEEDING ITS RACIAL
PRIDE for milleniums on an illusion; that its martyrdom is in large measure
self-invited; that its racial integrity is no more important in God's sight than
any other race’s integrity; that race is of so little importance in God’s sight that
he has not preserved the integrity of a single people now living, including the
Jewish people. * * *

"Their idea of an integral race, with its own exclusive culture, hallowed
and kept unified by a racial religion, IS ITSELF THE PROTOTYPE OF
NAZISM."

62

For publicly exposing the Jewish Politico-Economic Monopoly System,
Robert Edward Edmondson was indicted through Jewish Mayor LaGuardia
of N. Y. City on a charge of libeling and inciting "all persons of the
Jewish Religion"—which he never attacked.

Having directly attacked the Religion of Judaism as such, wii! Editor
Morrison of The Christian Century now be haled to court on a charge of
libeling and inciting a community to commit a breach of the peace ?

(1937 Addenda)

JEWISH RELIGION "PRACTICES’ 1 A MENACE TO GENTILE STATES?

(The above headed an Edmondson Bulletin of Oct. 1, 1937)

What does the word "JEW" signify?

"A RELIGIOUS Minority,” is an answer by Dr. Sidney E. Goldstein,
Chairman of the Social Justice Committee of the Central Conference of
American Rabbis, largest organization of its kind in the world.

"Jews constitute PURELY A RELIGIOUS SECT," is a statement made in
"The U. S. and German Jewish Persecutions," by the lace Jewish "legal light,"
Max J. Kohler, who says further: "We Jews constitute 'a RELIGIOUS
Minority’ in the U. S."

"The term 'A Way of Life.' ’’ by Rabbi Lewis Mann of Chicago Sinai
Temple, HAS BEEN GENERALLY ACCEPTED BY JEWRY AS A COM¬
PLETE ANSWER to the question What is the Jewish Religion?' ” That
statement is from a book "From Pharaoh to Hitler';" by Chicago Jewish
Author Bernard J. Brown, who is a lawyer.

"Judaism is essentially a religion of LAW." says the London Jewish
Chronicle of Aug. 13 , 1937. This follows a statement by Moses Mendelssohn,
a noted Jewish authority, that "Judaism is revealed LEGISLATION’ ■—as
quoted in "The History' of the Jews" by Jewish Historian Graecz.

Rabbi K. Kohler, in a 1900 "Manual for Schools and Homes," entitled
"Guide for Instruction in Judaism," Page 41, says:

"The Mission of the Jewish People is to unite mankind in spirit by their
monotheistic truth and their work for righteousness and peace. ISRAEL IS
THE MESSIAH—God’s anointed among the nations."

"Judaism is fundamentally anti-Christian—London Jewish World of Mar.
15. 1923.

"The ideals of Bolshevism are at many points consonant with the FINEST
ideals of Judaism."—London Jewish Chronicle of April 4, 1919.

Zionist Leader Maurice Samuel says in his 1924 book "You Gentiles: '
"We Jews cannot conceive of a duality—religion and life. I might say We and
God grew up together.’ In the heart of any pious Jew, God is a Jew. Between
Gentile and Jew there lies an unbridgeable gulf. The two ways of life are
opposed in mortal enmity. We thank God for having made us different from
you." (Pharisaical prayer).

"There is only ONE way in which the American People can escape
Fascism and Communism, and that is by establishing 'A THOROUGHLY
SOCIALIZED DEMOCRACY.' "—Resolution by the Central Conference of
American Rabbis, printed in the N. Y. "Times" of Sept. 13, 1936.

Jews Against Nationalism

"What stands in our way everywhere in the world is modern nationalism.
That is our chief enemy. We are on the side of Liberalism against Nationalism.
That is our only safety.’’ This is a quotation from "Race, Nation or Religion,”
by Dr. Solomon B. Freehof.

Jewish Author Bernard Lazare in his book "Anti-Semitism,” makes these
statements: "By the very fact of denying the divinity of Christ, the Jews place
themselves as enemies of the social order, SINCE THIS ORDER IS BASED
ON CHRISTIANITY.

The N. Y. Jewish National "Day” of Feb. 17, 1937, printed the follow¬
ing: "The Jewish Veterans of the U. S. ARE MOVING in the direction of
having a hill introduced in Congress PROHIBITING THE SPREAD OF
RACIAL OR RELIGIOUS PROPAGANDA AND BARRING SUCH PRO¬
PAGANDA FROM THE MAILS,”

"STRANGER THAN FICTION,” by Rabbi Lewis Browne, says: "Jewish
histories rarely mention the name of Karl Marx, though in his life and spirit
he was FAR TRUER to the Mission of Israel than most of those who were
forever talking of it. His book, "Capital,” is called the Bible of the SOCIALIST
movement.”

Dr. Oscar Levy, English Jew, wrote the following in a preface to the
book by Pitt-Rivers (1920) entitled "World Significance of the Russian
Revolution:”

"Are not the Jews the inventors of the Chosen People Myth, and is not
this obsession part and parcel of the political credo of every modern nation?
We Jews have grievously erred. We who have posed as having given to the
world 'the' savior, are today nothing else than its seducers, its destroyers, its
incendiaries, its executioners, We who have promised you a New Heaven have
given you a New Hell.”

"Holyday Prayers, a New Ritual for New Year and Day of Atonement,”
1936, Bloch Pub. Co., N. Y. City, contains the following Ko! Nidre prayer
under the heading "Evening Service for Atonement.”

"AH vows and self-prohibitions, oaths, vows of abstinence and promise,
vows with self-imposed penalties and obligations, which we may vow, swear,
promise and bind ourselves until the next day of atonement—may it come to
us in happiness—we repent them all. MAY THEY BE ABSOLVED, CAN¬
CELLED AND MADE NULL AND VOID, WITHOUT POWER OR
BINDING FORCE. MAY SUCH VOWS, SELF-PROHIBITIONS AND
OATHS BE CONSIDERED AS NON-EXISTENT.”

From Jewish Encyclopedia, Page 541,—"Many judges refused to allow
Jews to take a supplementary oath, basing their objections chiefly on this Koi
Nidre prayer.”

"We want all this Christmas propaganda stopped. The masses of the
Jewish people of America have a right to demand from the educational system,
of the U. S. that it KEEP CHRISTMAS OUT of public schools.” N. Y. Jewish
National "Day” of Dec. 14, 1935.

Rabbi Levinger’s "History of the Jews in the U. $.,” says that "of the
4,200,000 Jews in the U. S. m 19.28, fully 3,500,000 were of EAST EUROP¬
EAN birth or descent.” In other words, 82% are descended from Asiatic
Mongol-Jews.

64

"The Bolshevist Revolution was largely the outcome of Jewish thinking
and discontent.. What Jewish idealism and discontent have so powerfully con¬
tributed to accomplish in Russia, the same historic qualities of the Jewish mind
and heart ARE TENDING TO PROMOTE IN OTHER COUNTRIES."—
American Hebrew of Sept. 10, 1920. .

"The ONLY way to induce the American President to come into the World
War, was to secure the co-operacion of Zionist Jewry by promising them
Palestine. The Zionists carried out their part AND HELPED BRING AMER¬
ICA INTO THE WAR."—British Propaganda Agent, S. Landman, in the
London Jewish Chronicle of Feb. 7, 1935. 126,000 Americans were killed and
234,000 wounded in the World War.

"This is a Christian Nation," is an extract from the "Holy Trinity" case
decision by U. S. Supreme Court per Justice Brewer, February 29, 1892.

STATEMENT TO ASSOCIATED PRESS
(From Edmondson Bulletin of May 28, 1936)

Informing Robert Edward Edmondson that New York Representative
Samuel Dickstein had introduced a bill in Congress to investigate the "anti-
Semitic activities” of the Edmondson Crusade, in connection with the so-called
"Black Legion" developments in Michigan, the Associated Press, asking for
"comment on Dickstein," requested a statement May 27, 1936—which was
supplied in writing as below; and which of course was not reproduced in the
newspapers, thereby again proving the thesis of Jew-control.

Why comment on Dickstein? This alien-minded un-American-actioned,
international foreign-born Tew r from Russia, who assumes to teach patriotism to
native citizens who have absorbed it for generations, would not be in his pres¬
ent position were Congressional district-representation based on citizenship
instead of alien population.

I DARE DICKSTEIN TO LET ME TESTIFY BEFORE HIS COM¬
MITTEE AS TO THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH AND NOTHING
BUT THE TRUTH, ABOUT THE JEWISH ANTI-AMERICAN CONSPIR¬
ACY THAT IS COMMUN1STICALLY DESTROYING THE REPUBLIC,
AND GUARANTEE A PUBLIC BROADCAST THEREOF THROUGH'
THE METROPOLITAN PRESS.

For the thousandth time, I repeat: I am not opposed to Jews as individuals
or as to their religion or race; but I am unalterably against what the Jewish
System is DOING, by Financing Communistic Civil War, TO ENSLAVE THE
UNITED STATES.'

Investigations of the Edmondson Agency during the past two years by the
Department of Justice, Post Office, and Dickstein’s "Nazi" Committee, in¬
variably developed the fact that I have been merely exercising my constitutional
rights of free press and free speech—under handicap, for my mail has been
constantly tampered with.

If, as alleged, there is in existence a six-million "vigilante anti-Semitic
semi-military organization" of Americans, the Jewish exodus rush from the
United States would make the departure from Egypt look like a one-horse
parade. I have no knowledge of such a body.

Catholicism in Europe is apparently becoming aware of the reality of the
menace. Read this public confirmation: "The Jewish Spirit threatens to corrode
our economic and social life," declared the Federal Union of Catholic Youth

in Vienna, Austria, on April 3, 1936, according to an Associated Press cable.

'Polish Jewry is an avowed enemy of the Catholic religion; Jews are behind
the bolshevik and socialist forces now attacking our church.” That was in a cable
recently published by the Chicago Tribune, according to the James True Weekly
Industrial Report of Feb. 29, 1936. The February (1936) Catholic Gazette of
London, under a heading, "The Jewish Peril and the Catholic Church,” printed
a sensational article detailing proceedings at a secret Jewish Society meeting in
'Paris, at which a protocolic program of attack on the Catholic Church was
outlined, There was circulated recently in Europe this extract from the "Civilta
Cattolica, a Vatican publication: "The Jewish Peril menaces the whole world,
in particular the Christian nations.”

"DICKSTEIN’S OFFICE REPORTED TO US TODAY THAT HIS
HOUSE RESOLUTION TO INVESTIGATE THE BLACK LEGION ED¬
MONDSON ECONOMIC SERVICE AND OTHER ORGANIZATIONS,
DID NOT PASS.”—Report of June 29, 1936, received from the James True
Associates, Washington, D. C.

_ After the introduction of the Dickstein Bill the "advance Edmondson
testimony” pamphlet "Proof of a Jewish Conspiracy to Communize America and
Rule the World,” was sent to Congressmen, who apparently did not like the
Jewish "Gent” in the legislative woodpile.

"DISTRUST OF JEWS” IN BRITISH OFFICIALDOM
(From an Edmondson May 31 , 1936, Bulletin)

W. B. Ziff, Zionist Organization officer, writes in the N. Y, Herald-
Tribune of May 31, 1936, as follows:

Implicit in the viewpoint of British Government officials is a general
anti-Semitism and distrust of the Jews. Many in high positions believe vaguely
in the authenticity of the Protocols of Zion, the alleged inner Jewsh con¬
spiracy to rule the world. A heavy literature is extant in England on this
subject. Col. A. H. Lane's book "Alien Menace,” in which the Zionists are
accused of being the shock troops of this subterranean attempt at world con¬
quest, has gone through seven or eight editions. Volumes by Lady Queen-
borough, Nesta H. Wc-bster (Author of "World Revolution,” "Secret Societies,"
etc.) and others, all of the same tenor, have been printed in number¬
less editions, and patronized largely by the anti-Jewish sections of British
officialdom/’

JEW-JAILED FOR PREACHING PATRIOTISM

The following is self-explanatory:

In Cell 113, "Tombs” Jail, "jew York,” Friday afternoon, June 12, 1936.
In "The Land of the Free(?) and Home of the Brave" (?), I, Robert Edward
Edmondson, Preacher of Patriotism, Christian Editor and Publisher, am editing
mv "X-Ray 1 ' of June 13 behind the bars among "other criminals” in a
notorious prison. Below is my understanding of the situation:

This "commitment” follows a two-year crusade of preaching real Ameri¬
canism in an effort to awaken and enlighten Americans blinded by an alien-
controlled press: and follows arbitrary summons, alleging criminal libel-
unbacked by bill of particulars—issued personally by Jewish Mayor LaGuardia
of N. Y, City on June 8, 1936. To me, this is a concrete demonstration of my
fundamental thesis that "The Jewish Minority Rules the American Majority.
To illustrate more technically:

NO BILL OF COMPLAINT

Since the Mayor failed to specify charges in his criminal libel summons,
my counsel took the position that a citizen cannot answer charges until he
knows what they are—and refused to allow me to be publicly examined ac the
appointed court-hour of 10:30 on June 10, demanding a bill of particulars
from Jewish Magistrate Mogilesky—who presided when LaGuardia's "pain’
(in his stomach) prevented his "sitting,” as originally proclaimed. Threats to
issue a warrant for my arrest did not materialize, apparently for the reason that,
if a criminal libel charge could nor be sustained, then Edmondson might have
basis for suit against the city as to civil liability. Instead, the Mayors prosecutor
promised to supply the required bill of particulars at a postponed hearing at 11
A.M., June 12—at which time the charges were completely withdrawn, with
LaGuardia saying he planned to go to the ball game—with his pain.

ARE JEWS GOING TO RIOT?

In the Mayor’s ietter to the District Attorney, demanding criminal libel
action against Edmondson, it was alleged that my literature tended to incite
to riot.” Who? jews? And against whom? They are my only enemy, Yet I
have steadfastly advocated a settlement of the Economic Jewish Problem by
ballot versus violence or bullet. Documentary evidence proves that. LaGuardia
also calls my reports untruthful, whereas they have been dramatized reproduc¬
tions of the records of fact and authority. The charge that I, a non-churchman,
have been preaching religious bigotry, is laughable. Have I attacked Catholicism,
for instance? I have repeatedly announced that I am not against Judaism or
any faith or race, but against Jewish anti-Americanism or anti-Americanism by
any other minority.

The Jewish Problem is neither religious nor racial, in my judgment—we
are in a self-preservation fight aaginst JEWISH ECONOMIC PIRACY.

PUT IN CELL 113

Now, on the afternoon of June 11, I was arrested on a warrant for
"publishing a libel," under three indictments by the New York County Grand
Jury, complainants being in this order of preference: (1) The Jewish Religion,
No. 209220. (2) Virginia C. Gildersleeve, Dean of Barnard College, Columbia
University, No. 209221; (3) Frances Perkins, Secretary of Labor, member of
Roosevelt’s Supreme Council, No. 209222. 1 was paroled over night in the
custody of my attorney, Mr. John S. “Wise, Jr., of 135 W. 16 th St., N. Y. City,
pending bail next morning.

Cash bail was promptly offered at the appointed hour of 10:30 A.M.,
June 12. Delays called "red tape,” but that looked suspiciously like ''jew Tape,”
resulted in my being put in Cell 113 in the 'Tombs” Prison, release taking
place around 3:30 P.M.

Inspecting the exhibits on which the "crime of libel’ is based, I find
prominent in allegation No. 1 as to libeling "a religion,” this pamphlet was
headed: "Moe Roosevelt Wins Six-Point Solomon Star Medal,” wherein,
after invesigation of Jewish records of history, the so-called "Roosevelt Good
Luck Medal” was pictured as apparently indicating "Good Luck to a Modern
Moses, Leading Jewry in che Promised Land Under the Seal of Solomon.” Can
one libel a medal? As a matter of fact, there is nothing in the U.S. Constitution
prohibiting analysis of religions, although the "free exercise thereof” is
guaranteed.

Miss Gildersleeve's plaint is based on my publication of her gratuitous
letter of criticism of my Americanism, and my reply submitting the record,
under a heading, "Barnard College Dean Calls Truth Absurd.” Following
such publication, on April 23, she wrote me: "THANK YOU FOR PRINT¬
ING MY LETTER. I had thought of sending it to the newspapers."

Miss Perkins plaint is based on bulletin headed, "Perkins-Wilson Mystery
Solved?” which is summed up by a remark that it is a typical case of news-
reporting, quoting from the record. Is it criminal libel to ask a public servant,
"Were you known as Rachel LaZanski?” in view of Miss Perkins’ an¬
nouncement that she would be proud if she "had Jewish blood?"

THUS DOES POWERFUL INTERNATIONAL JEWRY, CONTROL¬
LER OF 500 BILLION OF WEALTH, CONQUEROR OF RUSSIA, COM-
MUNIZER OF FRANCE, USURPER OF AMERICANISM, HIDE BEHIND
THE SKIRTS OF TWO WOMEN WHO ANNOUNCE THEMSELVES AS
"CHRISTIANS.”

Well, it will finally all be washed up and out in the light of publicity,
"the cure for public evils.”

To avoid violence and the civil war promised by Jewish-Communism, I
have been patriotically battling two years, for publicity, without fear or favor,
to bring this Economic Jewish Problem before the bar of public opinion, where
it can be settled by the American-way of ballot as against bullet. IF THAT
13E TREASON TO AMERICA, I CHALLENGE FALSE JEWISH LEADER¬
SHIP TO MAKE THE MOST OF IT.

When the arresting officer presented his authority credentials to me in
the.presence of my wife he said: "Mrs. Edmondson, I hate like hell to have
to do this.”

My wife replied: ’’We appreciate your sympathy, but Jewish legal persecu¬
tion is exactly what we have been anticipating in this crusade for freedom. As
a veteran newspaperman Mr. Edmondson believes resulting widespread press
publicity will awaken his fellow-countrymen to militant ballot-defense of our
subverted Republic.”

INDICTING FOREMAN ADMITS HE IS JEWISH

GEORGE L. PAFORT, being duly sworn, deposes and says:

I am a citizen of the State of New York and reside at 560 West 171st Street, in
the Borough of Manhattan.

I have investigated the personnel of the Grand Jury who returned the indictment
herein to find ou'r the religion of the members.

68

Abner DistiLlator, who informs me he is Jewish, endorsed the indictment as acting
foreman.

Of the fifteen who have told me they served in finding this indictment, six cold
me they were Jewish. They are Jerome S. Blumauer, Samuel Rosenberg, Abner Disril-
laror. Jacob Abraham, Mervin L. Lane and Horry B. Lieber.

Henry J, Rosenbaum refused to see me or tell me whether or not he is a Jew.

A. Leigh Robbins. Moses Goldsmith and Marcel H.' Stieglitz refused to stare whether
or not they are Jews but made no claim to being Gentiles.

1 am familiar with the characteristics of Jewish people, having lived among the
millions in New York many years and these three to me present definite appearances of
being thoroughly Jewish and likewise their names are usual Jew names.

Only Messrs. Moe, Smith, O'Brien and BUuvelt, who remember serving on the case,
claim to be Gentiles.

Mr. Patton says he is Genrile. Mr. Hennessey told me he is a Christian.

Peter McDonnell is reported to me to be a Gentile but I have not been able to see
or talk to him.

From my knowledge of these Grand Jurors it is obvious that no sixteen could be
picked from them, without a large Jewish contingent.

It seems to me that of those who found the indictment the majority must have been

JSWS ' (Signed) GEORGE L. PAFORT.

VIOLATED GRAND JURORS OATH

The oath taken by the Grand Jurors in the Libel Indictment reads as follows:

"You shall DILIGENTLY INQUIRE, and TRUE presentment make, of all

such matters and things as shall be given vou in charge; the counsel of the People of this
state, your fellows' and your own, you shall keep secret; you shall present (indict) no
person from envy, HATRED or MALICE; nor shall you leave any one unpresented
through fear, favor, affection, reward, or hope thereof; but you shall present all things
TRULY as they come to your knowledge, according to the best of your understanding:
so help you God!”

PUBLICATIONS EDUCATIONAL—NOT MOB-INCITING

ROBERT EDWARD EDMONDSON, being duly sworn, deposes and says:

1 am the defendant, being charged with commuting certain alleged misdemeanors of
criminal libel.

That I am a native-born Aryan Christian American,, a citizen of the United States of
America, past sixty years of age, and my business career includes nearly forty years in
journalism as reporter, editor, publisher, financial writer and investment economist, from
coast to coast; that politically, I am non-partisan, pro-Conscitution, Pro-National, anti-
International and ami-Communist; not a member of any secret society; financially,
modestly independent, with no entangling alliances; religion, not a churchman but a
believer in Christian Principles; by ancestry, native American, chiefly Scotch descent, pre-
Revolution; a resident and citizen of the State of New York; and that I have never been
convicted of any felony or misdemeanor.

That my long and varied business and professional experience has provided me with
knowledge which enabled me co identify positively the sinister Jewish Leadership forces
which are subverting American Political, Religious. Economic and Social life, and raising
n mysterious wall against recovery.

That I have repeatedly announced that I am not against Jews because of their
religion, as a race, a people or as individuals, but because Jewish Leadership is actively
anti-American, is-attempting to jettison the American Political Philosophy and take over
the Country, and that I would continue to be anti-Jewish until Jewry repudiated such sub¬
version Were the offender any other than rhe Jewdsh minority, my attitude would be
precisely the same. This problem is the biggest and most accute thing in the world today.
It is an abstract economic problem so far as immediacy is concerned, bur it is born of an
essentially evil philosophy that has evolved a satamc system the chief weapon of which is
monetary.

Knowing that there was but one course, that pitiless publicity is the only cure for
public evils, in 1934 I started on a campaign to expose Jewish Anti-Americanism and
Talmudic Communism which has been called "The Code of Hell”; a "Rabbi Racket" that
victimizes its own followers; an international "Satanic System” subverting France, Britain.
Germany and Russia, causing the present depression and moving to take over the United
States through Jewish-Radical administration.

69

From the start I have been under no illusions nr misapprehension as to acute personal
dangers involved in this pro-American crusade: bur. with passionate conviction, I would
he false to patriotic duty to allow such considerations to divert me from exposing to my
countrymen the Cause of Communism that ;s destroying The Republic.

That since the beginning of my campaign to educate all Americans to the subversive
activities of- the Jewish Internationalists tu Suv.euze our Country, _ I_ luve written, pub-
ished ->'nd distributed some 200 odd bulletins treating of such activities in the political
,mJ educational life of America, and among winch, bulletins are incmdcd the 84 bulletins
incorporated in the -aforesaid three indictments by reference and annexed hereto that
rff bulletins so written, published and distributed by me state the true tacts with fair
comment on my part as to the effect or the principles advocated by and through the s„b
verbivt agents ana organizations of Jewish Internationalism; are all of puolic interest and
privileged in character.

LIBEL INDICTMENT AN OUTRAGE

The following is from the court argument of John S. Wise Jr., Counsel
for Robert Edward Edmondson, before General Sessions Judge Allen Aug. u,
1936, in the libel action started by N. Y, Jewish Mayor LaGuardia:

"This is a motion for the inspection of the Grand jury s minutes * * *
and general relief, If vou will read the indictments I think you will see that
Uiev do not ALLEGE ANY CRIME under Section 1340 or the Penal Code—
to the end that ANY PERSON was injured. One indictment is for libeling
everv member of the Jewish Religion.

'"The majority of this Grand Jury, by their own statements, were JEWISH,
and returned an indictment against this defendant for injury TO THEM¬
SELVES, and WITHOUT STATING WHAT THAT INJURY WAS.

"It was the duty of the grand jury to act impartially and protect defend¬
ant's substantial rights. How can a New York jury indict a man for libeling a 1
of the lews in the world. There is no such indictment on record any place. Still,
it seems you must not mention Jew,

"The patriots of the whole country are complimenting the defendant for
his activity in trying to eliminate socialism led by Jews such as have destroyed
Russia.

"We are entitled to inspect the jury's minutes. We should not be subjected
to trial without due process of law. It is an outrage.

"The Grand jury violated its oath. It was sworn to act impartially and
justly in proper protection of this defendant's substantial rights, An inspection
ought to reveal facts on which every member of this grand jury should be sub¬
ject to indictment for oppression."

Notwithstanding the foregoing, on Aug. 21, 1936, without opinion or explanation,
judge Allen refused to perron inspection of the minutes.

The following documentation accompanied the presentation to the court, with a mass
of similar data.--

THE COMMUNIST PLOT DETAILED

'(U ECONOMIC: To abolish private ownership; to establish state monopolies;
to bring about centralization; to encourage greed; to lower ideals of craftsmanship; to
promote unemployment; to establish a World Bank.

"(2) POLITICAL: To secure control of the press, broadcasting, screen and stage—
to influence public opinion; to put agents on all Gentile councils, in confidential posts
-iuch as secretaryships, to maintain espionage, to break up Gentile organizations from
the inside by fomenting dissensions; to decry patriotism and pride of race; -and in the
name of progress, evolution, universal peace and human brotherhood, set up Internation-
■ . -undermining national unity and weakening existing governments; to bang about

disarmament and establish, an international police force controlled by Jewish League of

Nations.

"(3) SOCIOLOGICAL: To set up plutocracy; encourage vulgar display and ex¬
travagance, to provoke the proletariat to envy, discontent, revolt and class or civil war.

(4) ETHICAL: To corrupt morals. weaken the marriage-bond, destroy, home
family.life and abolish inheritance.

"(5) AESTHETIC: To foster the cult of the ugly, debasing, decadent and degener¬
ate in art, music, literature, theatre.

"(6) RELIGIOUS: To undermine Gentile creeds and churches, and propugate crazy
cults, unhealthy mysticism, pseudo-science and sham philosophies."

'CHOSEN PEOPLE MYTH"

"Race is humbug,' is the conclusion of 'Jewish Author Brown in "From Pharaoh to
Hitler." in a chapter devoted to ''The Race Myth.” He asserts that there is less ground
tor the premise that jews are a race than those who hold themselves to be Nordics or
Teutons. Referring to the maddening mixture of the races of mankind, he intimates due
Russian Jews are descendants of Russian Mongolians who accepted Judaism, because the
icea of membership in a chosen race is attractive. Historian Max Radin is quoted as
saying that the only significance modern anthropologists will permit us to attach to the
phrase Semitic Race’ is language.'.”

PREMIER BLUM'S MORAL CODE

LEON BLUM, the present PRIME MINISTER OF FRANCE, wrote in
his book; "Du Marriage:’

"They (young girls) will return from their lovers as naturally as they now
return from having Tea with a friend. Virginity, thrown off gaily and early,
will no longer exercise this singular restraint which comes from modesty,
dignity and a sort of fc-ar ... 1 have never discerned what there is about incest
which is really repulsive. I merely note that it is natural and frequent for sister
and brother to be lovers."

In 'The Hidden Hand” monthly of September, 1920. published by the Britons
Society of England, is published a ''Protocol, 1 ' which students of the Jewish Problem
believe furnished the basis for the detailed subversion Protocols of the Learned Elders of
Zion,” called "forgeries” by Jews; alleged to have been from an address before Zionists
in 189”; carried secretly into Russia in 1902; and from there into the British Museum in
1905. The following is quoted from the "Hidden Hand”:

"In our last issue we published in the ’Spectator' letters a Protocol of a century ago.
La Vieille France has gone one better. The Revue des etudes Juives, FINANCED BY
JAMES DE ROTHSCHILD, published in 1880 two documents which showed how true
the Protocols are in saying that the Learned Elders of Zion have been carrying on their
plans for centuries.”

"ROTHSCHILD PROTOCOL”

"On January 1. A 1189, Chemor, Jewish Rabbi of Arles in Provence, wrote to the
Grand Sanhedrin, which had its seat at Constantinople, for advice, as the people of Arles
were threatening the synagogues. What should they dot This is the reply:

” Dearly beloved brethren in Moses: We have received your letter in which you tell
us of the anxieties and misfortunes you are enduring. The advice of the Grand Satraps
and Rabbis is the following.

" 'As for what you sav that the King of France obliges you to become Christians:
Do it, since vou cannot do' otherwise; BUT LET THE LAW OF MOSES BE KEPT' IN
YOUR HEARTS.

” 'As for what yo usay ab.out the command to despoil you of your goods (the law was
that on becoming converted the Jews would give up their possessions) ; Make your sons
merchants, that little by little THEY MAY DESPOIL THE CHRISTIANS OF THEIRS.

'As for what vou say about making attempts on vour lives: Make vour sons doctors
and apothecaries, THAT THEY MAY TAKE AWAY CHRISTIANS’ LIVES.

” 'As for what you say of their destroying your synagogues; Make your sons canons
and clerics that they may DESTROY CHURCHES.

As for the many other vexations you complain of: Arrange that your sons become
advocates and lawyers, and see that they always MIX THEMSELVES Up WITH THE
AFFAIRS OF STATE, in order that by putting Christians under your yoke. YOU MAY
DOMINATE THE WORLD, AND BE AVENGED ON THEM.

Do not swerve from THIS ORDER that we give you. because you will find bv
experience that, humiliated as you are, YOU WILL REACH THE ACTUALITY OF
POWER.

'' 'Signed V. S, S. V. FF,, Prince, of the Jews, 21st Casleu (November), 1489.” '

A JEW ON NATIONHOOD

In "From Pharaoh to Hitier,” Jewish Author Bernard J. Brown makes a very ex¬
haustive legal analysis of the claim to "Jewish Nationhood,” as below:

"The Jewish National Complex" is the title of one chapter of this remarkable book,
which says Jewish Nationalists hold that the Jewish Nation stands separate and apart
even though jews are enjoying tights and privileges of the country where they live.

Dramatically, the truism is held up that Jews will surely be feared and hated ir they
refuse to be Americanized. "What do we expect to contribute to American Civilization AS
JEWS?" he asks. "Do we expect to contribute the religion we have- abandoned?"

He holds that logicians are forced to conclude that demand for Jewish
nationhood in the lands where they live is "subversive of national unity. He
exclaims: "In one breath, our people claim to be internationalists, and in the
next, they assert that lewish nationhood is an ineluctable fact.

The author maintains that the Jewish Problem cannot be solved with
Zionism—all the Jews will not consent to settle in Palestine.

MORE DOCUMENTATION

"Out of jail on bail” your petitioner continued to publish and broadcast
exposures of additional Jewish anti-Americanism when new documentation was
received, among which were bulletins indicated hereinafter;

JEWISH VETERANS ANSWERED

The Jewish War Veterans of the U. S., Department of New York, by
Harry Bloomfield, Welfare & Service Officer, submitted June 11, 1936, the
following questions to Robert Edward Edmondson:

"What do you consider a good American, and by what standard?

"In the last war the Jewish Race contributed 250,000 men to the armed
forces of our country. I, as one of them, consider myself a 100% American.
14,000 men of our faith lie in Flanders' Field. Are they good Americans?

"Do you know that men of our faith fought in the revolution and helped
to build this country?

"What did you do in defense of your country?

"What makes you take the stand you do in printing your literature?"

First, I call your attention to the definition below on Americanism as
promulgated in February, 1927, by the Commanders in Chief of the Grand
Army of the Republic, United Spanish War Veterans, Division of Foreign
Wars, National Commanders of the American Legion and Disabled Veterans
of the World War—now broadcast by the Americanization Department of the
Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States.

"Americanism is an UNFAILING love of country; Loyalty to ITS insti¬
tutions and ideals; Eagerness to defend it against ALL enemies; UNDIVIDED
ALLEGIANCE to the flag.”

That is also my conception of Americanism.

I do not find the name "Jewish War Veterans of the U. S.” in the above
iist of endorsers. Why? May I ask why you use the title "Jewish Wat Veterans
of the U. S., instead of "American War Veterans"?

Is it possible that the name "Jewish War Veterans of the U. S.” is omitted
as endorsing the Americanism definition heretofore quoted because Jewish War
Veterans put JEWRY FIRST; that they maintain a DIVIDED allegiance; that
they are not eager to defend America against ALL ENEMIES—within as well as
without? Do not overlook the fact that a vast non-Jewish Majority also died in
the World War. They are entitled to first consideration. It goes without saying

[hat all soldiers of America who made rhe Supreme Sacrifice proved themselves
’’good Americans.” I honor them. And our disabled veterans should receive the
greatest care our nation can give them.

WHAT EDMONDSON DID IN THE WORLD WAR

W'hat did I do in defense- of my country during the World War?

Unfortunately, at the time of the war. I was past military age, and an
army liability; but I came out of the fight financially stripped whereas Henry
Lord has estimated chat 73C'r of New York war millionaires were Jews; and
he said in a N. Y. World interview on Feb. 17, 1921, that his investigations
indicated that International Jewish Financiers had caused the war.

I have documentary evidence proving (1) my profitless daily and aggres¬
sive co-operation with the Government in World-War work during the entire
conflict; (2) editorials in my publications demanding conscription of ALL the
nation’s labor and resources in place of drafting soldiers only; (3) published
strong opposition to Wilson’s demand that the United States join the League of
Nations—now denounced by the National Workers’ Party of Britain as "an
instrument of -war.” Zionist Leader Sokoloff declared on Aug. 22, 1922, "The
League of Nations is a Jewish idea; we created it after a fight of 25 years.”

What makes me attack the Jewish anti-Americanism that is destroying my
country?

Doesn’t rhe question answer itself to any veteran-patriot? I would take
precisely the same stand were offending leadership German, Russian, Irish or
Italian. I have repeatedly declared that I am not against Jews as individuals as
to their religion or race. This is a fight for self-preservation.

Do vou ask special privilege for a minority, Jews are entitled to MIN¬
ORITY rights, BUT NOT MAJORITY POWER.

"ZIONISTS PUT U. S. INTO WORLD WAR”

Read this confession by S. Landman, former British War Propaganda
Agent, in the London Jewish Chronicle of Feb. 7, 1936: "The only way to
induce the American President to come into the war was to secure the co¬
operation of Zionist Jewry bv promising them Palestine. The Zionists carried out
their part AND HELPED' TO BRING AMERICA INTO THE WORLD
WAR.”

IS THAT AMERICANISM?

Now, in my opinion, you Jewish War Veterans have an unprecedented
opportunity to perform a super-service not only to Jews but Gentiles. The hell-
fire of war should have purified you. Has it also made you self-reliant and in¬
dependent? Has it courageously individualized you? HAS IT FULLY AMERI¬
CANIZED YOU? I ask these questions since you apparently "huddle” by your¬
selves under the title "Jewish War Veterans of the U. S.,” from which legion
Gentiles are barred, although Jews may enter the American Legion,

If you will now boldly put Americanism above Jewry and place all your
resources unreservedly behind this Crusade for lOOfT Americanism—which
means chat you will have to completely submerge all Jewish interest—a patri¬
otic Gentile-Jew concert of action would promptly smash this predatory soli¬
darity that is destroying us.

I am unalterably opposed to government by dictatorship of any kind—includ¬
ing the Roosevelt Jewish Radical Regime.

73

I challenge the patriotism of American Jewish War Veterans to clean the
House of Jewry and oust its false leadership,

If that be what Jewish Mayor LaGuardia calls inciting to riot and Treason
to America, LET HIM MAKE THE MOST OF IT!

1938 ADDENDA
JEW VETS STOP FREE SPEECH

The address below was to have been delivered March 20, 1938. before the
Russian National League in New York City by Robert Edward Edmondson, but
the lessor of the Church of All Nations, 1 '' the place selected, refused to permit
such free speech because references unfavorable co Jews necessarily appeared
throughout.

[Telephone and other messages were received from many persons by Robert
Edward Edmondson, asking if an advertisement were true that he ■would speak
at the Church of All Nations, saying they would like to attend. He replied to
them, as he did to newspaper reporters, that, as he was denied free speech as
to the truth about Jewish Anti-Americanism, the only subject which he publidv
discussed, he of course could not appear.}

The action of the 'Church of All Nations” was probably influenced by
this itemJn the N. Y. Journal of March 17, 1938: "Charging that a scheduled
meeting Sunday of the Russian National League of Americans was to be a 'Jew-
baiting rally/ the East Side Post of the Jewish War Veterans announced today
that it would march upon the meeting and stop it in a nice way or any way we
can.' Murray Lipkin, Commandc-r of the Post, warned that 5,000 Jewish Veter¬
ans would be on hand to block the rally on 2nd Avenue, in the 'Church of All
Nations. Among the speakers will be Robert Edward Edmondson, anti-Semitic
pamphleteer, now facing trial on charge of criminally libeling * * * the
Jewish Religion.”

THE AGONY OF RUSSIA
(The Undelivered Speech)

To Russian Exiled Patriots and Citizens of the American Republic:

As a native American, I stretch out to White Russians in tire United States
'he hand of friendship. I wish I could speak in your language. I might then
better express to you my deep sympathy.

I love my country—you love your fatherland! Those of you who remain
its subjects, are virtually men and women without a country. You have been
driven from your homes.

I am sorry you have been subjected to Jewish Communist persecution in
this country. Those of you who have become militant fellow-citizens to the
point of joining our national guard, have not been spared.

But you can work for Russia HERE. You can now perform a double patri¬
otic duty. Your foe is our foe. We patriots must all unite and fight the common
enemy—Jewish Communism.

We peaceful people of Russia and America have not guarded our rights.
We have been too generous, too tolerant, too hospitable. Such is fertile ground
lor the Jewish Communist Revolutionary in whch to sow seeds of poison.
Eternal Vigilance is the price of safety as well as of liberty.

Men and Women of Russia' Fight with us for your country' When we
break the back of the Jewish International Power, victory will come fast.

I give you this Gentile Rally-Cry: "Patriots of the World—UNITF! You
have nothing to lose but the Jews!"

1940 ADDENDA

JEWISH VETERANS UNFIT FOR U. S. CITIZENSHIP'

(From Bulletin broadcast of June 20, 1940)

"The U. S. is a Democracy. Anti-Semitism : s a political weapon in :he hands of
those- who want to destroy our Democracy. Anti-Semitic agitation is die chief smoke¬
screen of the subversive anti-democratic Tru.un Horse and Fifth Column activities in this
country. THEY MUST BE STOPPED!" From "The Jewish Veteran" of May, 1940.

Whereas: "The Government of the U. S. is NOT a Democracy, but A REPUBLIC 1 ''
—V. S. ARMY CITIZENSHIP 1923 Training Manual.

"The Jewish Veteran." proclaiming itself to be "The Patriotic Voice of American
Jewrv." publishes, in its May, 1 940, issue, a lung article headed "Fifth Columns in the
Lh S.," wherein it tries to smear militant patriots, Robert Edward 'Edmondson and uthers.
with the brand of Fifth Column traitors, adding: "A fel'ow-Ameiica.n named Robert
'Edward Edmondson—I suppose he calls himself an American—is very proud of a
testimonial signed by the leading anti-Semites of 22 countries. He is probably the most
prolific wrtcer of anti-Semitic pamphlets in the U. S."

Who wouldn't be "proud" to have received from the 1937 Congress of 22 Nations
the following communication: "We are sending you this letter to show that we admire
you for your tenacity and great moral courage in fighting this greatest of all fights
against Jew domination of all we hold noble and sacred."

But the explanatory personal reference, while necessary for clarity, is incidental, and
the main point of this analysis is to show that the organ of the Jewish War Veterans of
the U. S. has publicly confessed that Jews are unfit for the high privilege of American
cmzenship because their veterans, supposed to he the cream of Jewry, do not even know'
(') what form of government they live under in the U. since they call The Republic
a Democracv—which word was significantly deleted from the Constitution. They re¬
pudiate their U. S. Army- Citizenship Manual. Are they trying to change our form of
government.'

Perhaps some light may be cast on his ineptitude by a reading- of the Congressional
Record, wherein on page 1145 of June 10. James True reports in Ins June 15. 1940,
weekly letter, the following statement is printed;

JEWS AFRAID TO GO TO WAR?

"The Central Conference of American Rabbis reaffirms its conviction that consci¬
entious objection to military service is in accord with the highest interpretations of
Judaism, and therefore petitions the Government of the U. S. to gtant to Jewish religious
conscientious objectors to war the same exemptions from military service as has long been
granted to members of the Society of Friends and similar religious organizations."

Maybe the foregoing "conscientiousness" was responsible for the failure of the
Jewish War Veterans Organization to sign the Patriotic American Crc-ed issued by the
Grand Army of The Republic, Veterans of Foreign Wars, United Spanish Veterans.
Disabled Veterans and the American Legion.

Typical of the way Jewish Veterans put jewism before Americanism the following
extracts are submitted from "A message from the Commander to all Jewish War Vet¬
erans and Jewish Communities," issued by George Marcus, Commander North Hudson
Post No. 76, Jewish War Veterans, circulated on the advent of the Jewish New- Year
in September, 1936:

"As fellow-Jews, fellow-citizens, fellow-Americans, we must stand united to further
the interests of*AMERICAN JEWRY. We are constantly alert to defend THINGS
JEWISH. We are wholeheartedy devoted to the support of JEWISH IDEALS."

Nothing is said about the support of or loyalty to AMERICAN ideals and institu¬
tions, or allegiance to the AMERICAN Flag. Why? Because "The Patriotic Voice of
American—JEWRY" speaks and acts for "Jewry FIRST."

IS the Jewish Fifth Column therefore a present deadly menace to peace and safety?

Save the Republic!

EDMONDSON HARD TO STOP, WAILS EDITOR MARGOSHES
(From Edmondson bulletin of June 13, 1936)

The following editorial by Dr. S. Margoshes, from "The Day." of June
10 1936, N. Y, Yiddish newspaper, is largely self-explanatory:

"For the last three years one Robert E. Edmondson, who styles himself an
investment expert, has been flooding the mails with most scurrilous anti-Semitic
circulars.' THERE SEEMS TO HAVE BEEN NO WAY OF STOPPING HIM.

"An effort to get the P. O. authorities to throw his filthy literature Out of

mails proved unavailing. , ,

"A bill introduced in the N. Y. Legislature forbidding the dissemination
of propaganda calculated to rouse race-hatred and race-feuds, got as far as the
second reading, AND THEN WAS STOPPED.

"When, months ago, some of us appealed to District Attorney Dodge for
relief against the torrent of anti-Semitic circulars then inundating the streets of
New York, the answer was that HE WAS POWERLESS TO COPE WITH
THE SITUxVTION UNPROVIDED FOR IN THE LAWS.

"Now. Mayor LaGuardia has found a way to deal with Edmondson. He
issued a summons charging criminal libel against Robert E. Edmondson. We
can only hope that the courts will support the Mayor's contentions. ’

ANSWERING THE CALL OF PUBLIC DUTY

(1) No "anti-Semitic" circular has ever been issued by Robert Edward
Edmondson, Answering the Call to Public Duty against Public Evil, his patriotic
anti-Jewish publications have been concentrated against Jewish anti-American¬
ism. The Arab Minority has done no politico-economic usurpation wrong to
America, as has Minority Jewish Leadership. They, too, are Semites.

(3) I am glad to have Jews at last confirm my statements regarding the
Post Office "OK" on mail-matter. Department of Justice investigation agents
found me merely exercising my rights of free speech and free press, under the
Constitution.

(3) Margoshes now- admits that Edmondson patriotic activities STOPPED
the so-called New York Assembly racial bill, which would have ' gagged" all
anld-Jewish free speech and prohibited circulation of the Bible or a U. S. Con¬
gressional Directory containing matter unfavorable to Jews.

IS MARGOSHES CONFESSING THAT JEWRY HAS DELIBER¬
ATELY ATTEMPTED TO SABOTAGE THE FREE SPEECH AND FREE
PRESS GUARANTEE OF THE U. S. CONSTITUTION?

Margoshes was Chairman of the Resolutions Committee of the National
Convention of the Jew-s, held at Washington, D. C., on June 14, 1936, to pre¬
pare for a World Congress of Jewry. At that meeting Rabbi Wise is quoted in
the N. V. Herald Tribune of June 15, 1936, as warning Jews:

"To refrain from saying things THAT TOMORROW WILL BE USED
BY THE EDMONDSONS and enemies of the Jew's, WHICH MAY BE
USED AS MATERIAL FOR A NEW EDITION OF THE PROTOCOLS
OF THE ELDERS OF ZION.’ "

Does Rabbi Wise now.' admic that the material used in the Protocols WAS
taken from previous utterances of the Jew's?

A GOOD JEW!

A Jew and his Gentile wife recently visited my N. Y. office, and bought
crusade literature, donating $25. She said to my wife, my volunteer executive
assistant, "Your husband is doing the only thing that will stop this Jewish

danger. My husband is a Jew. but he and his father are good Americans. I
do nor know what may happen to us, whether we will be killed by Jewish
orders,' or by Americans who realize what is being done to them; but my
husband will do to die with. 1 '

During the New York campaign for The Republic, threats were received
by telephone, mail and otherwise. A favorite epithet greeting my wife when
she answered the telephone, was "bitch/' She was informed by telephone and
letter "how Edmondson was to be mutilated,” details being given. Jews crowded
the LaGuardia courtroom on the day of the first summons, some of them
calling aloud for the "drawing and quartering" of the defendant.

NO APOLOGY!

On July 2, 1936, the Edmondson Libel Case was postponed by the prose¬
cution for the fourth time. The defendant then made the following announce¬
ment :

"It has been intimated to me that if I would apologize, the LaGuardia
criminal libel action against me for crusading against Jewish anti-Americanism
might be withdrawn.

"My fight has been for two great principles—Constitutional Free Speech
and against Minority Dictatorship.

''An apology is a confession of wrong-doing. I am not conscious of having
libeled 'all the persons of the Jewish Religion,' as accused. Retraction would
be betrayal of Principle and Country.

"Is it wrong to patriotically speak, expose and publish THE TRUTH
from the records of authority and fact about those who seek to overthrow our
political system?

"I SHALL MAKE NO APOLOGY FOR STANDING UP FOR AMER¬
ICA AGAINST JEWISH COMMUNISM. Contrary reports will be of enemy
origin.”

"LEAGUE OF NATIONS COMMUNISTIC"

(From Edmondson bulletin of July 3, 1936)

The self-explanatory passages below are from the 1936 May and June
issues of London "Saturday Review," founded in 185Y believed to foreshadow
the collapse of the League of Nations,

"What is the League of Nations? It is a League designed by the American
President Wilson—which the American Nation very wisely refused to join.

. . The . P 0 ^ League is to denationalize nations and destroy their

individuality. It is destructive of the independence of the people, by usurping
their sovereignty. THE LEAGUE OF NATIONS IS INTERNATIONAL
AND COMMUNISTIC."

B NAI B’RITH CALL TO ARMS!

(From a July 3, 1936, bulletin by Edmondson)

Under a heading: "B’nai BTith Sounds a CALL TO ARMS!" this power¬
ful Jewish Secret Order has broadcast a defiant printed program, calling for
new Jewish Solidarity—from which the following are significant extracts:

"Only through an organization which seeks to UNIFY FOR MORE
EFFECTIVE ACHIEVEMENT OF OUR COMMON JEWISH PURPOSE,
can you really hope to serve.

"The B'nai B’rith, the only International Jewish Fraternity in the world,

77

organized the anri-Defamation League (of Chicago). The work of this League
is directed by a governing board represented in all large cities of the U.S.A.
A few of its accomplishments are:

"Elimination of the defamation of the Jew in motion pictures.

"Removal of objectional character of the Jew on the stage.

"Discontinuance of libel of the Jews in magazine articles and trade
publications.

"Securing cooperation of the Associated Press in eliminating the word
'Jew’’ in connection with one accused of crime.

"Reduction to a minimum of discrimination against Jews by resorts,
hotels, private schools, etc.

"Securing discontinuance of 'The Merchant of Venice’ in school systems of
250 cities,"

Under another heading. "Our Plan of Action," this is printed:

"As to literature mailed bv and-Jewish organizations in this and foreign
countries, WE PROPOSE TO SECURE COOPERATION OF POSTAL
AUTHORITIES.

"Continued intensive work by the Defamation League to counteract by all
proper methods every attack upon the Jew' of such nature as to affect any
appreciable part of public opinion.

"Join now. WE COUNT ON YOU!"

Note particularly the implied control of the press and channels of
publicity. Observe the boasted accomplishment of special favors for Jews.

Tomorrow is Independance Day, July 4, 1936. Let us regenerate our
American Declaration.

B’NAI B'RITH "TELLS" THE PRESS?

The following special privilege-demanding letter from Chairman Sigmund Livingston
of the Anti-Defamation League of the Jewish B’nai B‘rith World Secret Order, to the
Editor of the Chicago Tribune, under dace of Chicago, July 16, 1936, printed in that
paper's issue of July 22, is self-explanatory:

"The issue of THE TRIBUNE of July 14 contains an article giving recital of the
motion entered by Robert Edmondson, indicted in New York for criminal libel. Among
the grounds assigned why action of the grand jury was illegal , is that the grand jury was
composed of a majority of "Mongol Jews" and that it should be composed of native born
Aryan Christian Americans. The early edition of THE TRIBUNE carried very large,
blackface type headlines as follows: "Editor Charges Indictment by 'Mongol Jews.' ” The
same headline was used, not quite as prominent, in the later editions.

"Edmondson has for some time made a business of issuing and selling circulars
containing the most abusive and scurrilous attacks upon individuals as weli as the
Jewish body.

"There is no one but could at once detect that tlie reasons assigned by him for the
motion to quash the indictment were merely for the purpose of publicizing scurrilous
matter and for the very purpose of having newspapers use this term of 'Mongol Jew’ in
prominent fashion. Our purpose in directing your attention to this is that greater care
be taken in the publicizing of scurrilous matters, even though they might originate under
the feigned guise of court procedure.

(Signed) "SIGMUND LIVINGSTON,

"Chairman, the Anti-Defamation League.”

The foregoing may be significant as to why most newspapers throughout the West
failed to carry the news of the sensational developments in this case, since the Washing¬
ton James True Service estimates that 60% of the Associated Press headquarters in the
New York Metropolitan news-source is Jewish.

Sigmund Livingston evidently tries to suggest that I conspired with LaGuardia to
have him start this action against my personal liberty for the sole persecutory-purpose
of getting the "Mongol-Jew" news into the headlines. However, this absurdity admits
that our campaign to force the Jewish Question into the press, HAS BEEN SUCCESSFUL.

JEW INTIMIDATION

The documentation as below was in an Edmondson Bulletin of July 25. 1936 and
"speaks for itself.”

Office of Joseph Gladstone
(Insurance)

84 William Street. New York

My dear Mr. Wise: July 23rd, 1936

I fully understand your lawful right to defend any type of client, but I do wish it did
not embrace individuals and groups that are referred to by Dorothy Thompson as the
Lunatic Fringe. It is distasteful to me to read of your tie-up with such characters as
Edmondson. Such types of clients do you more harm than good in the long run.

This constant propaganda against law-abiding minorities is extremely repugnant
to true Americanism. Why must you shoulder the defense of such un-American orofes-
sional propagandists?

(signed) JOSEPH GLADSTONE (Jew)
Office of John S. Wise, Jr.

Dear Mr. Gladstone: July 24, 1936

Thanks for your friendly letter of the 25d inst.

I am not impressed by Dorothy Thompson's ideas.

Nor am I alarmed about the effect on my professional standing by representing
Edmondson.

Of course our local judiciary is largely Jewish, but I don't believe that will em¬
barrass me. I estimate that our Jewish population in their segregated methods of living
amongst us, use Jewish lawyers in 90% of their legal affairs.

I shall not avoid an employment that helps bring out THE WHOLE TRUTH.

(signed) JOHN S. WISE, JR.

UNBELIEVABLE JEWISH ARROGANCE
(Published in Edmondson Bulletin of Sept. 2, 1936)

For Gentile enlightenment, 1 submit below a graphic parallel review of the 1924
book entitled, "You Gentiles," by Maurice Samuel, Zionist Leader.

WHAT THE AUTHOR SAYS

Between Gentiles and Jews there lies an
unbridgeable gulf. Ours is one life—yours
another. This primal difference is noc re-
conciliable. It is sbysmal.

Wherever the Jew is found, he is a
problem, a source of unhappiness to himself
and those around him. Jews arc everywhere,
to a large extent, ALIENS—unquestion¬
ably an alien spirit in your colleges. He
will not accept your rules of right or wrong
because he does not understand them. These
two ways of life are utterly ALIEN TO
THE OTHER. They are ENEMIES.

Our Jewishness is not a creed; it is our
totality. A Jew is a Jew in everything. We
cannot conceive of a duality—religion and
life, the sacred and the secular, I might say,
"We and God grew up together.” In the
heart of any pious Jew, God is a Jew. Jews
alone understand the universality of God.

There does not seem to be a single
country with a history which has not been
ANTI-SEMITIC at one time or another.

You might say, "Well. let us exist side
by side and tolerate each other." But the
two are not merely different; THEY ARE
OPPOSED IN MORTAL ENMITY.

REVIEW COMMENT
If that is so, why not promptly divorce
this alien element from America, since it
admits its inability to Americanize?

Why, then, butt in where he is un¬
wanted? Clinging to his own Code, the
Jew insists that Gentiles also adopt it. Why-
should Americans submit to such out¬
rageous tyranny in their own country?

Towering arrogance! The chosen com¬
plex! Superiority obsession! "Me and God"’
What Blasphemy!

WHY? Who is to blame’ Two billion
Gentiles are all wrong! Sixteen million
Jews are always right! What a Philosophy!

Our tolerance, then, means nothing to
the Jew, except to use it to his own selfish
ends.

79

In your world a man should be loyal
to his country, to his province, to his city.
To the Jew, naked loyalty is an incompre¬
hensible thing,

Jews are the most CLANNISH of
peoples. The fact that they have persisted
for 80 generations in maintaining a racial
and spiritual identity bespeaks essential
discipline of amazing vigor and power. The
discipline of our Jewishness is subjection
of the individual to the mass.

We Jews pay little attention to the after¬
life. We thank God FOR HAVING
MADE US DIFFERENT FROM YOU.

The instinct of the Gentile is to distrust
the Jew, of the Jew to distrust the Gentile.
Set side by side with us, you are bullies,
cowards and mobs.

' We are not in your midst by our own
will, but through YOUR action. We are
unwelcome to you because we are what we
are. We have more cogent reasons for
hating you (than you for hating us).

Liberal Jews, Radical Jews, Modernized
Jews, Agnostic Jews, ARE BECOMING
THE DOMINANT ELEMENT IN JEW¬
RY. We have produced an overwhelming
number of revolutionaries—banner bearers
of the world’s armies of “liberation.”

Repudiation of the Jewish Religion
DOES NOT ALTER THE JEW.

You must learn to dislike and fear the
modern and 'unassimiiated" Jew more than
you did the old Jew. He is more dangerous
to you. His enmity to your way of life was
tacit before. Today it is active.

We Jews are accused of being destroyers.
We are a homeless mass seeking satisfac¬
tion. We cannot find it. WE ARE DES¬
TROYERS—EVEN IN THE INSTRU¬
MENTS OF DESTRUCTION TO WHICH
WE TURN FOR RELIEF. Jews will re¬
main destroyers FOREVER. NOTHING
that you will do will meet our demands.

There are hardly any Jews among the
world's wealthiest men. The greatest fin¬
ancial institutions are almost exclusively
non-Jewish.

One thing is quite certain: A Jew is
never baptized for the purpose of becoming
a Christian. He aims to become a Gentile,

Jews put Jewry first.

Which contradicts his statement that the
jews don't know whac loyalty is. They do
when Jewry’s interests are concerned. Isn’t
the maintenance of mass discipline manifest
evidence of regimentation like that of
Communism?

"The Pharisee prayed: 'God, I thank
Thee that I am not as THE REST OF
MEN' ”—Luke IS: 10. The same Yesterday,
Today, Tomorrow!

Where there is mutual distrust, harmony
cannot live. So why waste time with Jewish
“good neighbor” ballyhoo—designed to de¬
ceive Gentiles?

Americans did not invite the Jewish in¬
vasion. They would welcome an exodus.

Another confession-defi. Boasts and pride.

Then, a Jew "converted” to Christianity
remains Jewish in his real attitude toward
it!

This is a threat and a warning Gentiles
will do well to heed before it is too late—
noting the gains made by Jewish Com¬
munism. What COLOSSAL INGRATI¬
TUDE!

Forcing themselves into the midst of their
“common enemy,” they foolishly tell him
of the destruction Jews work. "Bereft of
Vision, the people perish!" WHY
SHOULD AMERICA NURSE SUCH A
VIPER? If we are destroyed, can we say
we were not warned?

What about Rothschilds, Warburgs, Sas¬
soon, Samuels et al? Author Sombart says
in “Jews & Modern Capitalism:” "The
Jews made an Art of lending money. They
became LORDS of Money—and LORDS
OF THE WORLD.”

Does the Jew use the screen of religion
to promote his own material interests?

80

You may ask; What difference is there
between a Jew claiming to be an American.
an J an Italian claiming to be one-' Is it more
HUMILIATING for one than the Other?

The cleft between you, Americans and
Italians, Frenchmen and Germans, is but
a wide jump compared with the CHASM
BETWEEN US AND ANY ONE OF
YOU. We cannot assimilate.

JEWISH QUESTION ECONOMIC
NOT RACIAL NOR RELIGIOUS

From Oct. 3, 1936 Bulletin by Edmondson.

"We have consistently refused to attack Jews AS INDIVIDUALS. We do
not attack the Jews on racial or religious ground. We believe in Justice for
Jew and Gentile.

"WE ATTACK JEWS ON ECONOMIC GROUNDS."

The foregoing is from the Sept. 5, 1936, issue of "The Black Shirt" of

London.

In his maiden speech on the Jewish Problem in the early part of 193A
the undersigned, emphasizing the primary economic nature of this menace,
answered the question, "What is the remedy?" by proposing, "an ECONOMIC
Boycott of all Jewish Production."

In "The Riddle of the Jews' Success," by Stoltheim, this confirming state¬
ment is made;

"The enormous liberation of energy caused by the Speculative Principle
of the Jew, and the enormous development of external life caused thereby, de¬
ceive as to the true state of affairs. The glitter and gleam appear to many as
the veritable light of life; but it is, in reality, ONLY THE PHOSPHOR¬
ESCENCE OF CORRUPTION. The last reserves of national energy are forced
into action—WHICH MUST END IN EXHAUSTION.

"Jewish understanding does not look beyond today and tomorrow, and
operates destructively and suicidally in all directions. The Jewish mode of
thinking is inorganic, and is, for that reason, incapable of creative action, The
Jew is unable to conceive that the world dominion for which he is striving
would mean SIMULTANEOUS WORLD RUIN."

It will not be contested that the illegal "NRA," patterned after the Israel
Moses Sieff "Politico-ECONOMIC Planning" set up in England, was essentially
economic. Boston Jewish Merchant Edward A. Filene was the "financial angel"
of this monopoly.

Here are economic confessions from Jewish sources;

"The Jewish Question is not so much anti-Semitic today as it is AN
ECONOMIC QUESTION." That sentence is from the London Jewish Chron¬
icle of June 26, 1936, quoting President N. J. Laski of the Board of Deputies
of British Jews.

"The economic boycott being practiced against the Jews is even more
deadly than the sporadic acts of violence thus far committed in Central and
Eastern Europe," says H. J. Seligman, Director of Public Relations of the
American Joint Distribution Committee, on returning from abroad, according to
an article in the N. Y. Times Sept. 28, 1936.

The Arabian Nationalist Leader Husseini accurately sums up the economic
factor in the N. Y. Times of June 21, 1936, thus: "European newspapers

Alter all this, why not disfranchise
Jews- Under their Constitution, states
may do so. Americanism is an organism
which cannot tolerate an alien or foreign
element—and must in self-preservation cast
it out as poison to the body politic. Most
of us consider it a privilege and an honor
to be an American.

mention 'anti-Semitism- in Palestine. This is nonsense. We ourselves belong to
the Semite Race. We turn against the Jews, not because they are lews, but
because THEY THREATEN OUR EXISTENCE.”

A GENTILE-JEW CONFERENCE

The following is from Edmondson bulletin of Oct. 10, 1936:

A prominent Chicago Jewish "capitalist" lawyer-author asked the editor
for an off-the-record conference this week. Having read and renewed Ins
book apparently an effort to arrive at a fan understanding Detween Non-Jew
and Jew, the meeting was welcomed. Following is the enlightening record

made in shorthand at the conclusion thereof:

"In your opinion," asked the editor, “how many Jews are Communistic._
"Among my acquaintances of a thousand, not more than .'5; and that is

representative. , , . ,

^ "But one of the most prominent of New- York Jews admitted, to me
personally that approximately 85% of Jews were Communistic; and James
Waterman Wise says 'the-Jewish masses' are Communistic, challenging the

American Jewish Committee to disprove it." '

"They don't know what they are talking about," declared the lawyer-
author "My family and I and many other Jews refuse to accept the so-called
Jewish leadership of Rabbi Wise, Samuel Untermyer, Justice Brandos, Chaim
Weissman, the Warburgs, etal.”

REPUDIATE FALSE LEADERSHIP!

"Then," argued the editor, "why don’t the said Jewish masses publiciv
repudiate such false leadership? Get rid of it!"

"We can't get rid of it- How can we?"

"That’s up to you Jews. Necessity finds a way. When an individual re¬
fuses self-discipline and disobeys laws, the world itself drastically disciplines
him If minority Jewry doesn't 'clean house’ and discipline its leadership, a
world majority that believes itself to be grievously injured by the Jewish
System is going to do it without regard to Jewish feelings

"Then you propose, for example, to deport my children who do not

approve the Jewish Leadership?" . . ,

"Why not if they bv silence condone Jewish anti-Americanism and will

not stand up and be counted for Country First. I am not fighting Jews as
individuals. I am fighting the leadership of the Judaic Economic System, which
ruthlessly victimizes both non-Jew r and Jew individuals.

"There is now no such thing as Judaism." ,

"There is, however, Jewishness, which you condemned in your book, and

on contacting which Gentiles become anti-Jewisb."

"But the men indicated are not representative of Jewish leaders, the

lawyer insisted. . , , , , , • ,

"Being prominently vocal, constantly declaring that they stand for Jewish

licrhts and actively working therefor without public challenge or contradiction,
the Gentile world naturally accepts them as representative leadership How can
you expect non-Jews to understand the views of a silent contingent.

"What do you say these leaders are trying to do,?"

"THE JEWISH COMMON PURPOSE”

"Overwhelming circumstantial evidence shows that they are attempting to
impose Jewish political domination on every large country in the world through

predatory economic monetary weapons"

Without attempting refutation, the Chicago lawyer-author contented him¬
self with: "You are all wrong.”

"That's what most of the Jews say," retorted the editor, recalling the
"chosen" superiority complex. "But, as a lawyer, you will admit that a
'general denial’ without rebuttal proof .exposes a fundamentally weak case.
Opinions will not settle this matter. The American public is going to judge
from the facts and the unrefuted evidence of the record.”

"But you are not going about the solution of the problem in the right
way. Now, when I go into court and present my conclusions to the judge, he
tells me that he must have supported precedents, which I give him; and he
decides the case on those authorities and relative merits."

CITING THE RECORD OF EVIDENCE

"That is precisely what I have been doing—citing the record, quoting
authority after authority—mostly Jewish—in support of allegations of Jewish
anti-Americanism. Take the report of the conference of American Rabbis,
recently held. They declared against the present American System and advocated
'A Thoroughly Socialized Democracy in its place."

"Yes, but many American non-Jew statesmen have argued for exactly the
same thing, such as Norman Thomas, Clarence Darrow, John Haynes Holmes,
and men of that caliber."

"Those men are not representative American statesmen. THEY ARE
SOCIALISTS. All socialists are antagonistic to Americanism. And 'the
thoroughly socialized democracy’ of the rabbis is essentially Communistic.’’

"Ail these prominent Jews mentioned are acting for profit, not leadership.
They speak publicly for profit; they write for profit. I wrote my book on the
Jewish Quesrion for profit.” Thus said the author,

"YOU THEREBY CONCLUSIVELY PROVE MY THESIS THAT THE
JEWISH QUESTION IS NEITHER RACIAL NOR RELIGIOUS, BUT
ECONOMIC."

ADDENDA

DREISER SPEAKS OUT

Theodore Dreiser, the writer, wrote to Hutchins Hapgood in "The
Nation" of April 17, 1935: "Liberalism, in the case of the Jew, means INTER¬
NATIONALISM. If you listen to Jews discuss Jews, you will find they are
money-minded, very sharp in practice. The Jews lack the fine integrity which
at least is endorsed, and to a degree, followed by lawyers of other nationalities.
The }ew r has been in Germany for all of a thousand years, and he is still a
lew. He has been in America ail of 200 years, and he has not faded into a
pure American by any means—and he will not."

A "GOOD” JEW GONE "WRONG"

The flip-flop described below in an Oct. 19, 1936, bulletin is typical of
the communist policy of changing positions to meet new circumstances:

"I join with you in condemning any Jew' or Gentile who fosters ideas or
theories or practices subversive to the traditional American order."—James
P, Warburg wrote Robert Edward Edmondson Dec. 4, 1934.

Roosevelt is the man about whom Warburg said in his 1935 book, "Hell
Bent for Election:”

"He has FLOUTED the Constitution, which he swore on oach to protect;

he is no more likely to change his basic characteristics than is a leopard to
change his spots, and the sooner we have done with him, the better for the
countrv.”

j

"I shall cast my vote for the re-election of President Roosevelt in Novem¬
ber.”—James P. Warburg wrote Secretary of State Hull, Oct. 13, 1936.

Has Repudiator Warburg turned "Red?” Or is he obeying the Communal
"Call of the Blood" to '‘Save Jewry!"

"I am a Loyal Jew',' Warburg reminded me in 1934 when we first sat
down in conference to discuss "Americanism.”

Jewry FIRST—Americanism LAST?

James P. Warburg’s reason for his somersault is phrased thus: "It is
impossible for me to support an opposition (to Roosevelt) which either will
not or cannot recognize that Economic NATIONALISM lies at the root of
our great difficulties."

NATIONALISM! The secret is out. Nationalism is Patriotic—Fascistic,
when militant. Jewry is AGAINST FASCISM and FOR ' A Thoroughly
SOCIALIZED Democracy”—according to the American Rabbi Conference.
THAT is COMMUNISTIC! Jewish Communal Ideals are notoriously INTER¬
NATIONAL—and anthnational.

So James P. Warburg is now apparently against "The Traditional American
Order," which is NOT Internationalism!

"ANTI-SEMITIC” CAUSES OF TODAY

(The address herein reproduced in part was delivered upon the unsolicited invitation
of the represenatives of the famous Cardinal Newman Club of New York in their church
(auditorium ac 529 W. 121st St., N. Y. City, Feb. 7, 193", before more than 500
Catholic Youth, by Robert Edward Edmondson.)

The subject listed for this address is "'Anti-Semitic” Causes of Today. Quotation
marks enclose the word ''Anti-Semitic” because it is a misleading term.

It is of primary importance to know exactly what we are to talk about before
analyzing a subject. Therefore, let us examine the designation "Anti-Semitic.”

The number of Arabs, Syrians and Egyptians who are also Semites practically equals
the Jewish world population total as supplied by Jewish authorities.

Therefore, to be "Anti-Semitic'' you must be against ALL members of the so-called
Semite Race—which is an absurdity, since most Occidental peoples contact only the
Jewish Semites.

Husseini, Arab Nationalist Party Leader, aptiy sums up the crisis in the N, Y.
Times of June 21, 1936, saying: "European newspapers mention 'Anti-Semitism' in
Palestine. This is nonsense, as we ourselves ; are Semites. We turn against the Jews not
because they are Jews, but because they threaten our existence.”

In presenting this matter to you I wish to make my own position crystal clear. I
sincerely believe in the truth of the information offered. It is submitted and analyzed
with the justifiable motive of concern for the public welfare. While the heart of the
trouble is economic, in my opinion, the important fields of politics, publicity, religion
and race have been invaded in varying extent.

I do not belong to any church; but I am a believer in practical postive Christian
principles. I am not a member of any secret society. My business is that of an independent
economist, editor and publisher. I am likewise independent in politics, being merely
a patriot who stands for traditional Americanism.

I have never been against Jews as individuals, as ro race or religion.^ Under the
Constitution of the U. S., I am for intelligent racial and religious tolerance forever. But
1 am unalterably against that power-lusting false leadership which is promoting a preda¬
tory economic system that is destroying Jew as well as Gentile.

Where there is an effect, there must be a cause. There must be _an offensive
Jew ism before there can be a defensive reaction of Anti-Jewism. Let us diagnose from
symptom back to origin.

SOMETHING WRONG

In this connection I quote from the N. Y. Times of Jan. 30, 1937, part of a sug¬
gestive display-advertisement published by the Polish Newspaper Guild of America,

protesting against American Jewry's attack on Poland. It said: "There must be SOME¬
THING wrong somewhere if millions and millions of Germans, Arabs, Hungarians,
Rumanians, French, English. Italians. Poles, Russians and Americans NURSE ANTI¬
PATHY TOWARD THE JEWS."

In "The Truth Abouc The Jews", published in 1922 by Walter Hurt, the most pro-

jewish Gentile-writer I have contacted, the following economic admission is made:

"Racial prejudice rises only when different races come into direct economic conflict. His
(the Jew's) economic ethics are not those of the Gentile. The Jew being an Oriental,
his mental processes are unlike those of the Occidental. He exists in a mental ghetto.
Even as the characters of the Hebrew Language read backward, so do Jews think re¬
versely. Modern Finance is chiefly the creation of the Jews. They found that the sceptre
of power was fashioned of gold. Possession of much of this metal made an enslaved
people masters of their masters."

Pro-Jewish Prof. Werner Sombart in his 1913 "Jews and Modern Capitalism," makes
this supporting economic analysis: "Capitalism was born from the money loan. The
Jews made an art of lending money. They were taught early to look for their chief
happiness in the possession of money. They fathomed all the secrets that lay hid in money.
They became Lords of Monty—and Lords of the World."

The British Guardian of July-August, 1924, reports Karl Marx, "Jewish Father of
Communism," as having said: "What is the basis of Judaism? A practical passion and
greed for profit. To what can we reduce his (the Jew’s) religious worship? To extortion.
What is his real god? CASH!"

THE RECORD OF THE SOVIET

Let us examine the record of the Soviet, where anti-Semitism is punished by death.
This confession is from the American Hebrew of Sept. 10, 1920:

The Bolshevist revolution was largely the outcome of Jewish thinking and dis¬
content. What Jewish Idealism and discontent have so powerfully contributed to ac¬
complish in Russia, the same historic qualities of the-Jewish mind and heart are tending
to promote in other countries.’’

The London Jewish Chronicle of April 4, 1919, says: "The ideals of Bolshevism are
at many points consonant with the finest Ideals of Judaism."

The 1919 Overman Report to Congress, quoting Rev. Dr. George Albert Simons of
the U. S., formerly resident m St. Petersburg: "In the Northern Community of St.
Petersburg out of 388 members only 16 happened to be Russians. All the rest were
Jews. 265 came from the lower East Side of New York.”

From the Dec, 29, 1934, American Patriotic Coalition Statement to a Congressional
Committee: "The Communist movement in the U. S. is an alien conspiracy; it is treason.
The brains and moving spirit are in Russia."

The preface to the 1920 "World Significance of the Russian Revolution” was written
by London Jewish Savant Dr. Oscar Levy. He admits: "Jewish dements supply the driving
force for both Communism and Capitalism.”

From "The Jewish State," by Theodor Herzl, Zionist Leader, we read: "When we
Jews sink we become a revolutionary proletariat (Communistic); when we rise there
also arises our terrible power of the purse" (Capitalistic).

CAPITALISM FINANCES COMMUNISM

From "The Truth about the Slump” (1932) by A. N. Field: "The enormously
significant thing today is that the Jewish "power of che purse" and revolutionary activity
are working in a common direction; and there is a mass of evidence that they are working
in unison.” Is Jewish Communism the tool used by Jewish Capitalism to subvert Gentiles?

I believe it is.

From the Brooklyn Jewish Examiner of Oct. 20, 1933: '"The Roosevelt Administra¬
tion has selected more Jews to fill influential positions than any previous administration;”
referring to Bernard M. Baruch as "Unofficial President;” to Felix Frankfurter as "one
of the President's most trusted advisors;" and to New York Judge Rosenman as
"Roosevelt's Right Arm."

From the N. Y. Times, Jewish-owned, of June 28, 1934: "The underlying philosophy
of the New Deal is the philosophy of Justice Brandeis of the U. S. Supreme Court.
The NRA (later declared unconstitutional) is almost a composite of his dissenting
opinions."

, , Arsi-.l o iQo 6 - "The Tews of America

ccJir —*«** *« wbat -

y° u * oin $ to do aboUt U - F w riiarv 7 1936 published a letter on the world

The London Jewish^hrom^l t F b ^9 Qf - P g British Government, reading

war ay former Je^idi Propaganu. g President to come into the world wav

in part; "The only way to induce the American promising them

a?

From the January, 19-8, is t th naturai wor ld, your ideas, your destiny

Marcus Eli Ravage: XT e M “ the bottom not merely of the latest great sear,

U^^lyXorySu^^d'ttldTwtth the irresistible might of our sp.ri,

r

Jewish baTta, IJthe father of the U. S. Federat R«*m
AMERICAN SYSTEM CHALLENGED

The C^al Conferee of AmericafUbb^ larges,^-gm-tjon .of _^

in the world issued the; fol l?^ iri ^ fl h ent Social system. We advocate a

Times of sept. 13, i9o6. We ch ^ en ^ . one wav m which the American people can

tlT byYabbsh.ug "A THOROUGHLY

SOC 'TZT^P™ no. .-"ti'V'a'b^oo ^ ««

Lwtb^a^andTob-dTES'n.o'thioo grand balanced divisions as a bulwark aga.nsr

fed a* rr responsibility for rho evil deed

(Communism) hatched and planned in the^ m P ° the^on of Rabbi S. S. Wise, James
In this politico-economic 0 «. 29, 1935: "Jew. who

Waterman Wise, wiote in die jockeying themselves into the position of

deny that many Jews are Communists are Mkey are Communistic,

citizens on toleration. He imphes that tl J b Zionist Leader Maurice

This confession appears in You Gen . ' 0 f destruction to which we

s* :n 5s *** *« , u ^ - ■

Jhe an %brls,,a n Century'' of Chtcago.ua

contains this indictment: Most ■ present ignorance is likely to be greatly

the Jews. When they learn t jeir o Igan i 2ar j 0 n ? It is also a propagandist organization,
disturbed. Jewry is a mutua a A UC h its vital forces tend toward solidarity unity,

“Ta “Che population ts bound ,n have trouble because

it is bound to MAKE trouble.

PUBLICITY CHANNELS SUBVERTED

In the Untred States the "g^ power of th^TiS

exchanged vita. poUtico-econonuc lofortnaru.n, rs

"’“trr^^^Lou sss&f

?‘Sf£t^^"aper S ''abstain ton, saytng that auy person unfavorably

r “ :: s q£ r . --j—„ s - scssj

the following: Scribner A Sons } P American development depends

^ “passes. ^ “ !rifli ” £ Ae Sak

of this book.

A research into modern religious fields in connection with the subject of this address
uncovered the following from the London Jewish World of March 1 5, 1923: "Funda¬
mentally, Judaism is anti-Christian."

From the N. Y. Jewish National Day of Dec. 14, 1935: "The public schools must
be kept clear of Christmas carols and other Christmas influences. We want all. this
Christmas propaganda stopped,"

The January 10. 1937, issue of the Jewish N. Y. Morning Freiheit, printed this
attack: According to the Jewish Religion, the Pope is the enemy of the Jewish people
by the very fact that he is the head of the Catholic Church. The Jewish Religion is
opposed to Christianity, and to the Catholic Church in particular.'’

You may wonder how a minority can control the economic life of the majority. But
one man with command over a million dollars can dominate 100 others dependent for
their existence upon his resources. The number of Jews do not count. Money-control does,
ft works behind Gentile Fronts. One subversive key-post Jew, backed by the practically
unlimited wealth of Jewish Solidarity, can easily dominate his associates. And the power
of gold enables Jews to crowd Gentiles out of and monopolize the avenues of opportunity.

The 40% Jewish proportion of the population of Greater New York represents the
largest centralization of jews in the world. New York is the Power Center of the U. 5.
Washington is the Political Power Center of the U. S. More Jews admittedly hold
key-positions in the present national regime than in any other.

All this is not "by accident." False leadership is responsible, in my opinion. All jews
are not guilty, but all Jews are "under control.'' Many have told me they did not like
that leadership. They said they could not get rid of it. I pointed out that the world,
which disciplines a man who refuses to discipline himself, would probably do it drastic¬
ally, in self-defense.

The quotations I have listed in the address are taken mostly from Jewish records.
While the surface has barely been scratched, I believe they furnish significant evidence
as to the " 'Anti-Semitic' Causes Of Today.”

DIVERSION STRATEGY

The following question was asked by a priest-member of the audience:

"Since Mr. Edmondson has attacked Jews on economic grounds, why have they
attacked him in court on RELIGIOUS grounds'”

The answer is that the camouflage strategy of Jewish leadership is to divert attention
from the heart of the matter, which they cannot answer, and in reply merely enter a
general denial—considered in law to reflect a weak case.

And, having been attacked in court on religious grounds, there was no alternative
for the defendant but to extend his investigations beyond the politico-economic field
into that of the so-called Jewish Religion—which he began immediately after indictment
in 1936, proceeding to assemble his findings in exhibit form for submission to court m
rebuttal—as well as to broadcast them in line with his masthead declaration: "Pitiless
Publicity is the Cure for Public Evils."

A DOUBLE-FRONT POLICY

Evidence of a control poLicy is found in the 1936-7 Jewish Year Book,
just out, where, on Pages 224-5 the following statement is made after reference
to the LaGuardia court action against Robert Edward Edmondson for "libeling
all persons of the Jewish Religion”:

"'The Lawyers' Advisory Committee of the American Jewish Committee
* * * reached the conclusion that recourse to law and efforts to secure additional
legislation were seldom advisable. The report pointed out the possibility of
evoking UNDESIRABLE publicity; the difficulty of bringing an action which
will not MAKE A MARTYR of the defendant; and the PARAMOUNT
NECESSITY of refusing to take any action that would VIOLATE THE CON¬
STITUTIONAL GUARANTEES OF FREEDOM OF SPEECH, OF THE
PRESS AND OF ASSEMBLY. It may be the part of wisdom to adopt prin¬
cipally a long-range program of education."

DEMURRER FILED

A demurrer was filed on March 16, 1937, in the Edmondson Case, with
supporting brief containing the following, accompanied by documents quoted
hereinafter.:

"The N. Y. Statute defining libel does not make it a crime co publish
defamatory matter concerning a race, religion or class (group) of people.

"Clearly, all the bulletins listed are treatment of subjects of governmental
administration and public interest, which defendant published with good
motives and for justifiable ends in honest belief of their truth.

An appendix in support of the Demurrer includes the following:

The following is from Exhibit 38: "The Patriotic Crusade defining aims, policies
and objectives, of the indictment "bill of particulars: I stand for American religious

and racial freedom under the Constitution forever; but 1 am unalterably against Jewish
Minority Politico-Economic Monopoly over the American Majority. Is there any religious
libel in that?

The following is from the Jewish Magazine "Reflex" of November, 1927;

"The modern rabbi is a man of the world. He is valued most as the executive
manager of the wealthy congregation. He knows and cherishes the power of money, and
is an adept in matters of finance, mortgages and loans."

From the .August, 1927. issue of the same magazine: "Rabbi means master, intellec¬
tual master. Neither by law nor tradition is he a priest or a healer. He has no religious
function whatever.”

On* Page 368 of "Anti-Semitism: Its History and Causes, ' the Jewish Author,
Bernard Lazare, declares: "Nor is Lt only Talmudism that is dying; but the Jewish Re¬
ligion itself is in its death agony."

"Judaism has been described by Moses Mendelsohn, learned Jew, in this way: 'Judaism
is not a religion but a law religionized.’ Judaism is not a religion. It is a sect with
Judaism as a rite."—Taken from "Occult Theocracy” by Lady Queenborough.

The "Holyday Prayers,” a "New Ritual for New Year and Day of Atonement."
eleventh edition. Bloch Publishing Co., "The Jewish Book Concern,” New York, pub¬
lished in 1936, contains the following Kol Nidre under the heading Evening Service for
Atonement”:

"All vows and self-prohibitions, oaths, vows of abstinence and promise, vows with
self-imposed penalties and obligations, which we may vow, swear, promise and bind
ourselves from this day of Atonement until the next day of Atonement—may it come to
us in happiness—we repent them all. May they be absolved, cance led and made null and
void, without power or binding-force. May such vows, self-prohtbmons and oaths be
considered as non-existent.”

Commenting upon Kol Nidre. the Jewish Encyclopedia, Page 541 makes the following
statement- "It cannot be denied that, according to the unusual wording of-the formula,
an unscrupulous man might think that it offers a means of escape from the obligations
and promises which he had assumed and made in regard to others . . .Many judges
refused to allow them (Jews) to take a supplementary oath, basing their objections

chiefly on this prayer.”

Defendant a non-churchman, noted that The London Jewish Chronicle
4 1919 said ’that: "The ideals of Bolshevism are at many points consonant
Finest Ideals of Judaism”; that the London Jewish World of March 15, 1923,
"Fundamentally, Judaism is anti-Christian.

Describing the emancipation of the Jews, Jewish Author Bernard Lazare in
"Anti-Semitism, Its History," makes the following statement: "The Jews made
conouest for which thev were armed—that economic conquest for which they
preparing themselves so many years. By holding gold, they became masters
masters. They dominated them.”

of April
with the
declared:

his book
the only
had been
of their

JEWISH POWER B. C.

The following is quoted from "Anti-Semitism Yesterday and Tomorrow,” a 1936
book by Rabbi Lee Levinger, Chapter 1: "In the year 59 before the Christian era, Marcus
Tullius Cicero, the leading orator and lawyer of his day, was defending a certain Lucious
Valerius Flaccus against the charge of embezzling various funds, including some which
had been collected by Jews to send to their temple in Jerusalem. In that farnous speech
C,cero remarked: 'Next comes the malicious accusation about the go d of the Jews, it
is this count in the indictment, Laeiius, that has made you pick out this place; and that
is responsible for the crowd around us. You know very well how numerous that class is,
with what unanimity they act, and what strength they exhibic in political meetings. But

I shall frustrate their purpose. I shall speak in a low tone, just loud enough for the

jury to hear. There is no lack of men, as you very well know, co stir up these fellows

against me and every patriotic citizen; and I have no intention .of making the cask of

such mischief-makers lighter by any act of mine.' ”

At the 1934 N. Y. State election for Governor, Lehman was Democratic candidate,
Moses Republican nominee, Solomon the Socialist and Amter the Communist, all Jews.

The front page of the Sth edition of the afternoon Chicago American of April 6,
1936, had a seven-column head: "Secret Meeting against Horner" (Solomon Levy)’
Governor of Illinois, over an arcicLe quoting Mayor Kelly in a Jew-warning speech under
the auspices of "The Democratic League of Chicago." with a political address by Jewish
President-Alderman Jacob M. Arvey, during which the latter is quoted as saying; "I resent
the fact that this (racial) propaganda has been started. I am a Jew first and then a
Democrat!"

A JEWISH SUPRESSION

Following are Excerpts from "The Mystical Body of Christ in The Modern World,' 1
by Rev. Dennis Fahey, Blackrock College, Dublin. This 1935 book carries the Imprimatur
of the Catholic Church:

"In April, 1919, there was published by the command of His Majesty, and by His
Majesty’s Stationery Office, a White Paper entitled Russia.’ No. 1 (1919). A Collection
of Reports on Bolshevism in Russia, as below:

" 'Unless Bolshevism is nipped in the bud immediately, it is bound to spread in one
form or another over Europe and the whole world. It is organized and worked by
Jews who have no nationality and whose one object is to destroy for their own ends the
existing order of things ... I would beg that this report be telegraphed as soon as
possible in cypher in full to the British Office in view of its importance.'

"Why did this official White Paper . . . disappear from circulation and become un¬
obtainable? And why was there published in its place an abridged edition, in which this
particular passage was eiiminared?

"It is obviously and logically clear that there is only one race on earth that has any
interest in the suppression of this official document, and that race is the Jewish race."

"Asia," the magazine, on Page 223 of the February-March issue of 1920, printed
this: "In all Bolshevist institutions the heads are Jews. They are contemptuous of every¬
one, which excices the people against them. They. look upon Bolshevism as Jewish.
Anti-Semitism is widespread in the Red Army. There is a great national religious fervor
among the Jews. They believe that the promised time of the rule of 'God’s elect' on earth
is come.”

"Al" Smith’s "New Outlook” magazine of February, 1954, contained the following
under the signature of James E. Abbe, author of "I Photograph Russia:" "The men who
control Russia are not Russians. Members of the Jewish race from all over the world,
predominate.”

LA GUARDIA’S BLOW TO FREE PRESS

The following letter, dated Aug. 21. 1936, signed by Louis Waldman, Jewish
Attorney, addressed to the New York Herald Tribune, was printed on the editorial page
of that paper August 29:

"May I congratulate you upon your sane and sound editorial in today’s Tribune
(Aug. 27, 1936), entiled 'Anti-Semitism as Criminal Libel'?

"For the disseminators of anti-Semitic propaganda I have nothing but loathing;
but the remedy sought to be invoked by Mayor LaGuardia is socially dangerous and
legally unsound.

"If the law', under which the disseminator (the defendant) of anti-Semitic propa¬
ganda in New York is sought to be held, is sustained, then freedom of expression and
criticism will have received a fatal blow from most unexpected sources."

In his letter of June 8, 1936, demanding action against defendant Edmondson,
Mayor LaGuardia said in part: "It is repulsive to all thinking persons that religious
prejudice and racial hatreds exist in this country. This type of agitation may incite a
breach of peace and public disorder. You will find startlingly similar motives established
in the case of Rex vs. Osborne in London, 1932. The law laid down in that case is the
law today in this country. The remedy js by invoking the law of criminal libel if the
statements are not truthful and the motive unlawful."

Defendant challenges Mayor LaGuardia to produce AUTHENTIC evidence that his
publications caused a single breach of the peace or violence either before or after the
indictment of nine months ago.

89

WAR CENTERS ON U. S.

From Edmondson bulletin of Apr. 27, 1937:

Following is the substance of an address delivered recently by Robert
Edward Edmondson before a private and informal group of New York men
and women:

Communism—also known as Internationalism, Marxism, Socialism and Bol-
shevism—has mysteriously and steadily gamed in America doling the past
twentv years despite growing anti-Commumst activity, until we are now' im¬
mediately confronted with the nationalization of our youth, undermining of
our individual property right, destruction of our great Constitution through
proposed sabotage of the Supreme Court Guardianship.

If the SHOCKING FACTS are not soon received by citizens with open
minds, Americans and their Government of, by and for We, The People, ARE

LOST.

A pall of FALSE FEAR seems to paralyze the defense-initiative of higher
intelligence, culture and wealth. That fear would evaporate like sun-pierced fog
if the news censorship now blinding National Patriotism is thrown off.

I'm not an alarmist. I'm just a hard-boiled veteran newspaperman who
stands with Lincoln— Let the People Know the Truth, the WHOLE Truth—
and the Country will be SAFE." Otherwise, if the great sound middle-class of
America is not awakened and informed, I dread to contemplate the future.

Since discovering the Cause of Communism in April, 1934, I have been
conducting a patriotic DEFENSIVE campaign against the False Leadership of
the International Jewish Economic System, announcing that I was not against
Jews as individuals or as to their race or religion—Yet I am now DEFEND¬
ING in the courts, an indictment brought, against me by a New York Grand
Jury the majority of which were Jews, who alleged that I had libeled the Jewish
Religion, whereas the Jewish ECONOMIC System only was exposed.

The explanation lies in the fact that the economic accusation is unanswer¬
able, and the screen of religion is invoked as a camouflage diversion.

My own resources have been exhausted by this patriotic drain; but I have
been instrumental, through the magnificent co-operation and sacrifice of patri¬
otic groups throughout the country, in exposing this plot in detail to over 10
million people. In this connection, I would like to say that 90% of my general
support has come from outside the big cities.

In the final analysis this is not my fight, but that of the whole nation.

Imperative in this great crisis is the support of Americans who believe in
our form of Government, in our Constitution, in our Liberty—patriots who are
against allowing Socialists, Communists and Jewish Internationalists, through
political corruption, to invade our country and prostitute its great system to
their own ends.

There ought to be financial millions ready for such a grand service. There
should have been millions behind this crusade before now. The preservation of
American Institutions is worth ANY sacrifice. In this country true Individual
.Libertv was bom. Here British Subjects and Black Slaves became FREE
CITIZENS.

Americans are long suffering, over-tolerant, self-sacrificing; but the time
has come when there will be a trial of the question as to whether or not they

90

are WORTHY of and FIT for the unprecedented individual liberty the United
States Constitution confers upon them. We may have to pass through the Valiev
of the Shadow—like Russia, Germany, Hungary, Spain.

The False Leadership of International Jewry covets this Promised Land
of ours more than any other.

The struggle converges on our country, which has been seized through
secret controls ot the Press, Politics and Economics.

America is now in FULL CRISIS '! And I cannot impress it upon you
too earnestly—"IT IS LATER THAN YOU THINK!"

LAGUARDIA GIVEN A JEW MEDAL

The following was printed under date of May 3, 1937:

"The American Hebrew," at a Waldorf-Astoria Hotel banquet on May 2,
1957, presided over by International Jewish Banker Henry Morgenthau, Sr.,
hung a medal on New York half-Jew Mayor LaGuardia, in consideration of—

Having had Robert Edward Edmondson, native American of the Scotch
Minority, indicted for alleged libel of a non-existent ''Jewish Religion": and
whose patriotic exposures of Jewish-Communist Conspiracies are preposterously
denounced in the formal medal presentation as "rabid anti-Semitic incitations of
one Robert Edward Edmondson, LONG SUSPECTED AS AN ALLY OF
SUBVERSIVE UN-AMERICAN FORCES," resulting in the "indictment of
Edmondson on a charge of criminal libel for traducing the Jewish Community" ;
this last phrase being a deliberate lie, for the charge reads "libeling all persons of
the Jewish Religion."

(As the aforesaid indictment has not even been acted upon by a trial-court
—the District Attorney having failed to set trial since it was brought over ten
months ago—the farcical character of the presentation is obvious.)

"Mayor LaGuardia's selection (for the medal) was based on his devotion
... to A FAIR DEAL FOR ALL New Yorkers irrespective of race or creed,"
unctuously announced the "great" International Banker Morgenthau.

Americans did not. START this fight; BUT THEY ARE GOING TO
FINISH IT; and those who get in their way will do well to beware the wrath
of an outraged people. This is not a threat; it is not even a warning; it is a
prophecy which will be fulfilled when Citizen Patriots take back their own.

JEWISH PLOT TO "REMOVE" LOYAL U. S. ARMY OFFICERS
(Edmondson Bulletin of May 10, 1937)

Rabbi Stephen Wise, Zionist Leader, and noted for his sympathies for
several subversive movements, is the Editor of the Monthly Magazine 'Opinion.’

The April (1937) number carried the mention of three prizes awarded to
writers on the subject; "The Way to Combat Anti-Semitism.”

One of the prize-winners was Rabbi Victor Eppstein, graduate of the
Jewish Institute of Religion. He says:

The present program of palliative relief must give way to a program of
fundamental reconstruction. American Democracy MUST BE SOCIALIZED
by subjecting industrial production and distribution to the will of the Peoples'
Congress. The first step is to ABOLISH the Federal veto and to enlarge the
express powers of the National Government through immediate constitutional
amendment. A GRADUAL MARCH IN THE DIRECTION OF SOCIALIZ¬
ATION WILL FOLLOW.

"At the same time, energetic measures must be adopted to prevent the
inevitable reactionary attempt to overthrow democracy ' n America, let it be B

systematically removing from key positions in army
AND NATIONAL GUARD ALL OFFICERS WHOSE LOYALTY TO
THF CONSTITUTION MAY BE QUALIFIED BY CLASS ALLEGIANCE.

Rabbi Wise is the leader of the American Jewish Congress, and his
endorsement of Victor Eppsteins anti-American utterances implies the approval
of leaders of Jewry in the United States.

A CHALLENGE TO AMERICAN FAIRPLAY
(Made Sept. 1, 1937)

TO FELLOW PATRIOTS:

Trial of Robert Edward Edmondson, N. Y. City Publisher, indicted June
11 1936 on a charge of libeling "all persons of the Jewish Religion, has

been set for September 13, 1937, after a delay of about one year, during which
time Mayor LaGuardia's alleged "danger to the peace of the community has
been allowed to roam at large, since the District Attorney has had the power at
any time to bring the case to trial.

Justice Philip J. McCook of the State Supreme Court, on May 28, 1937,
denied motion fot removal of the case from the jurisdiction of the New York
City General Sessions Courts, to the Supreme Court ot Rockland or ertchester
Counties; which motion was made on the ground that a rair trial in the midst of
the greatest aggregation of Jew's in the world is .impossible because of their
enormous secret politico-economic influence; and in consideration ot the long
list of invariably unfavorable rulings quoted heretofore.

Are patriotic citizens to be suppressed from exposing to their countrymen
Communistic or other conspiracies to overthrow their government on the theory
to 7might "INCITE” THE FEELINGS OF EXCITABLE JEWS OF A
NOTORIOUSLY "PACIFISTIC” MINORITY MADE JITTERY THROUGH
CONSCIOUSNESS OF GUILT?

1 2 to 0 denials of defendant's relief motions in favor of the Jews have been

made in New York City courts.

While financial aid is needed for an EFFECTIVE presentation of the
Edmondson Case, this is not a personal solicitation for charity funds. I nurse no
personal ambitions; nor have I a martyr complex. I merely des.re to be of
practical service to my country.

I repeat, this is not a charity-solicitation. BUT IT IS A CHALLENGE
TO AMERICAN FAIRPLAY, and a Summons to High Duty.

The defendant has steadily maintained that a self-preservation fight should
require no salesmanship.

This is YOUR fight.

If I am convicted, so is Free Speech.

With Freedom of Press further subverted—THE PUBLIC PERISHES.
Are those who refuse to act substantially against the acuce danger worthy of
and fit for Constitutional Liberty? They cannot dodge the consequences of
dodging their responsibilities.

THINK IT OVER!

Edmondson Today—YOU Tomorrow!

92

WORLD CONGRESS ENDORSES EDMONDSON CRUSADE

In September, 1937, Defendant Edmondson received the following testi¬
monial'dated Sept. 4, i>*37, signed by tne delegates from 22 nations to an
anti-Jewish Congress assembled in nrfurt, Germany:

"Your case of World Jewry versus yourself wnich is to be tried on Sept.
13th, and which now has a world reputation, has been much discussed by those
present at tms conierence, and admiration expressed for the valiant light you
are putting up on beftail of our Aryan Civilization against the pernicious
forces of Judan.

"We are sending this to show you that we are thinking of you, and admire
you for your tenacity ana great moral courage in fighting this greatest of all
lights against Jew domination ol all we hold noDle and sacred. 11

The following reply, sent to the members of that Congress, was broadcast:

' I have received your fraternal greeting containing the signatures of the
representatives of 22 nations in convention assemoled, endorsing mv crusade
in behalf of tree speech and national patriotism againsc international Jewry—
World Enemy No. 1 .

"This unqualified generous testimonial of commendation from the highest
assemblage of our Noble Cause of Liberation has overwhelmed me, who am
but an humble instrument.

"Adequately to express appreciation would require the gifted eloquence
of my great countryman Patrick Henry, whose immortal "Give me Liberty or
give me Death" brought freedom to America, and has ever been for me a
source of inspiration.

"What can withstand embattled patriots of the civilized nations acting
concertedly against the anti-nationalism of a Jewish International economic
system made mad by 'the terrible power of the purse’—to quote the words
of Zionist Leader Herzl?

"Although New York's Jewish Mayor LaGuardia instigated this free
speech persecution on June 8, 1936, followed by my indictment June 11 on a
charge of publishing a libel of all persons of the Jewish Religion,' the matter
has again been postponed to Nov. 15 , 1937, when my Gentile Counsel and I
shall fearlessly face the court and demand acquittal in the name of justice.

"On with the self-preservation fight!"

JEWISH "ROLL OF HONOR"

Based on a World Jewry poll, 120 "greatest living Jews" are in a Jewish
"Hail of Fame" based on "contributions to humanity," as published Sept. 25,
1937, in the N. Y. Herald-Tribune. The following are included in this
"'Roll of Honor:"

Maxim Litvinoff, Soviet Communist Foreign Minister, bandit-criminal.

Leon Blum, Ex-French Socialist-Communist Premier, whose book "Du
Mariage" favors incest,

Judah L. Magnes, American Rabbi who admits Jews are leaders in all
revolutionary movements.

Felix Frankfurter, whom Ex-President Theodore Roosevelt branded as
Bolshevistic.

Louis Dembitz Brandeis, reputed "Father" of the Communistic New Deal.

93

EDMONDSON TRIAL AGAIN POSTPONED
(Edmondson Bulletin of November 15, 1937)

UPON APPLICATION OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY, trial of the
Jewish Religion libel case against Robert Edward Edmondson, has again been
put off to Monday, Feb. 7, 1938.

'THE PEOPLE ARE NOT READY FOR TRIAL AT THIS TIME" was
the statement made by the District Attorney, notwithstanding the undisputed
fact that the defendant has been held for seventeen months under heavy bail,
large expense and in restricted conditions.

Is this equivalent to a confession that there IS no case against the defendant?

By the force of the circumstances involved, the defendant was obliged
reluctantly to assent to further delay, despite his preparedness as implied by his
having already subpoenaed FOR THE DEFENSE, for trial as of Nov. 15, the
following partial list of witnesses—which the New York newspapers signifi¬
cantly called an "All Star Cast:"

Mayor F. H. LaGuardia, Rabbi Stephen S. Wise, Bernard M. Baruch,
Samuel Untermyer, James P. Warburg, Henry Morgenthau, Sr., Rabbi Sidney
E. Goldstein, Congressman Samuel Dickstein, Columnist Walter Lippmann,
U. S. Supreme Court Justice Brandeis’ daughter Susan; Former "American
Hebrew” President David A, Brown, Editor Samuel Margoshes of "The Jewish
Day;" Communist M. J. Olgin; N. Y. Supreme Court Justice Samuel I. Rosen-
man, called "Founder" of Roosevelt's "Brain Trust" and Roosevelt’s "Right
Arm;’’ Charney Vladeck, James Waterman Wise, Rabbi Israel Goldstein, Col.
Edward Mandel House; Rabbi Louis D. Gross, Editor of the Brooklyn "Jewish
Examiner;" Prof. John Dewey; A. A. Berle, Jr., N. Y. City Chamberlain;
Roger N. Baldwin, Director of the American Civil Liberties Union.

(The Edmondson Defense effected subpoena service on additional "star
witnesses" Prof. Felix Frankfurter and Secretary of Labor Perkins while they
attended The Survey Associates banquet at the Biltmore Hotel in N. Y. City
on Dec. 2, 1937. Prof. Rexford G. Tugwell, Col. E. M. House and Gen. Hugh
S. Johnson also have been subpoenaed to testify for the Defense at the post¬
poned trial on Feb. 7, 1938.)

The manner in which the various "princes" accepted subpoena service is
amusing in some instances. Baruch, Rosenman, Lippmann accepted quietly.
Samuel Untermyer was explosive—■”} have never been summoned in this man¬
ner before; it is an outrage: I will break 'em in pieces!’’

Rabbi Wise bellowed, when served in the hallway, of his building after
failure in his office, "I have been betrayed!”

Morgenthau meditatively commented; "Oh yes, Edmondson; he is
finished!”

Rabbi Margoshes was at first mellow: "I shall be most happy to testify
against Mr. Edmondson." The Process Server retorted: "But you are summoned
to testify for defendant.” Margoshes exploded: "That’s all cock-eyed!'

94

Below arc extracts from the three speeches of —

(1) Captain Hc-nry Hamilton Beamish, Founder of the Anti-Jewish movement in
Great Britain, member of a prominent, old English family (Oct. 30, Oct. 31, Nov, 1) ;

(2) Adrien Arcand, Leader of the National Unity Party of Canada (Ocr. 30,
Oct, 31, Nov, 1);

(3) Robert Edward Edmondson of New York City (Oct. 31, Nov. 1).

The addresses were delivered in New York City as follows: October 30, at trie
N, Y, Hippodrome, October 31 at a private banquet in the Harvard Club. November 1,
193 "7. to a private assembly in a prominent club house.

A SELF-PRESERVATION FIGHT
Bv Robert Edward Edmondson

The high honor of welcoming to the U. S., Veterans Beamish and Arcand In the
national patriotic movement against the International Jewush System, was alloted to Robert
Edward Edmondson at the October 31 meeting of American leaders. Part of his address
is given below:

"This is more than a happy event. The NEW HISTORY that is in the making will
not fail to record it.

"Captain Beamish, Veteran anc Dean of this historic movement of Liberation, REAL
representative of the Jew-opposed people of Great Britain, brings a world-message of
TRUTH.

"You will have the priceless privilege of listening to Nestorian words nf wisdom
from a great-hearted Soldier-Statesman who KNOWS whereof he speaks by the unim¬
peachable authority of two-score years of SELFLESS PERSONAL SERVICE to a world-

titupv.,

"Down from the North has come Adrien Arcand, Leader ot the National Unity
Party of Canada, a gifted young 'White Knight without reproach or shame,' a flame of
youthful ardor, bearing his 'Key to the Mystery' and a clarion call to arms from the
embattled patriots of historic Quebec, organized and ready to defend God, Home and

Country.

"In this great crisis, can we doubt that were the Immortal Lincoln alive touay he
would reiterate: ’Let the people KNOW THE TRUTH—and the WORLD is safe -1

"We stand uncompromisingly FOR the basic constructive principles that make for
human welfare and REAL progress. We also stand unalterably and ACTIVELY 'ANTI'
Jewish ideologies and their subveisive practices.

" 'Not to be ANTI is to SURRENDER the FIGHTING Spirit,' warns Nesta H.
Webster, celebrated author of 'World Revolution-’ To win this war, you must not onLy
have knowledge and courage, but a selfless last ditch determination.' Without it, you are
LICKED before you start.

"Fellow Patriots Beamish and Arcand, as an America Patriot I warmly welcome you
to my Country and to 'Kosher' New York. We stand shoulder to shoulder with you and
all White Men in this militant defense against that Jewish System which is destroying
Nationalism and Western Civilization.

"We have not been idle here in these United States. Your speaker got himself in¬
duced and is to be tried on a charge of libeling 'alt persons of the Jewish Religion'—
millions of them, everywhere, dead and alive.

"This feat was accomplished, not by attacking the so-called Jewish Religion, but by
exposing the COMMUNISTIC POLITICO-ECONOMIC SUBVERSIONS OF THE
TEWISH SYSTEM.

Many people have insisted that this case would never come to trial. That dangerous
premise has heavily handicapped us ■ financially. Who wants to help where apparently
none is needed?

"Knowing that this enemy NEVER gives up, I personally have not shared that
opinion, and have gone steadily ahead with exhaustive preparations, It there IS a
dismissal, it will be due to that THOROUGH preparation at heavy expense, combined
with frequent costly legal broadcasts exposing the LAW-weakness of the persecutors.

"Above all else, the false leaders of che Jewish System fear adverse publicity, per¬
sonal initiative, forceful courage and calculated audacity.

"Our only problem is financial. There should be behind this Americanism move¬
ment now hundreds of thousands of dollars to make effective the work of thousands of
patriots.

"This momentous matter rests on an exceptionally broad foundation. For the first
time in history, International Jewry has been publicly exposed as a predatory SYSTEM—
an ECONOMIC system. What happened’

95

"A FALSE camouflage RELIGIOUS indictment was brought. Ponder this: Are
ECONOMICS and the Jewish RELIGION the same thing? The economic exposu-re
remains unchallenged. It cannot be refuted.

"The Jewish System of these Perpetual Aliens' —a term Captain Beamish tells me
was applied to them by Lord Chief Justice Coke of England—has broken down our
Economic System.

"It has rotted our politics by Bribery, Blackmail and False Propaganda; it has
-corrupted our Judiciary with complicated rules of procedure that prostitute our con¬
stitutions; it has converted into 'kept men of the press' our Journalists and Publishers
through sinister advertising control, overthrowing rhe Free Speech First Line of
Defense; it has publicly ridiculed our National Patriotism and pacifized us into cowards
and poltroons.

"With whose resources has this 'Plan of Hell' carried on?

"YOURS AND MINE!

" 'How DEEP are the sources of your indignation?’

” ‘When wild the IRON in America's soul be touched?

"The Edmondson Defense goes into Court with clean hands, unafraid, and armed
with the Might of Truth.

"But we do so under the shadow of a colossal economic power, and with a pitiful
financial inadequacy.

"If convicted, we shall appeal—to the United States Supreme Court—IF IT RUINS
US; for we are in a life and death struggle for EXISTENCE.

"WE MUST WIN!”

"SEGREGATE THE JEWS”

By Captain Beamish

"We are engaged in the greatest war history has ever known. The question is,
whether the Jew shall rule the world, or we white men.

"The chairman has said that I was the originator or the movement in England.
After taking part in three wars, I was tired seeing millions of people wiped out for
this race of Asiatics.

"Jews, being aliens in our midst, they must be segregated.

"The Boer War occurred 37 years ago. I found all the gold and diamond mines
were owned by Jews; that Rothstein controlled gold; Samuels controlled silver, Samuels
controlled oil; Baum controlled other minerals, and Moses controlled base metals. Any¬
thing those people touch they inevitably pollute.

"What we have to realize today is that the Jews are working overtime to bring on
another war. The position is serious.

"There are very few newspapers not owned or controlled by Jews except in. the
countries that have named the Bolshevists as the enemies of mankind.

"In discussing the Jew question, we must be conscious of the fact that we are
white people. We must not mix race with religion.

"The answer to the problem is to be found only in one of three ways:

(1) Kill them, which is out of the question.

(2) Sterilize them, which is out of the question.

(3) Segregate them—and there is only one place, Madagascar."

"I have been in many countries, but conditions in New York are perfectly appalling
to me.

"The whole essense of this fight is moral courage. Robert Edward Edmondson is a
great fighter. Large numbers of people will die for their country, but few will live for ic.

"In 1848 the word "anti-Semitic" was invented by the Jews to prevent the use of the
word ' 'Jew. ” The right word for them is "Jew." We are not against the Syrians,
Armenians and Arabs, all of them Semities.

"I implore all of you to be accurate—call them Jews. There is no need to be delicate
on this Jewish question. You must face them in this country. The Jew should be
satisfied here. I was here forty-seven years ago; your doors were thrown open and you
were then free. Now he has got you absolutely by the throat—that is your reward.

"Who rules Russia? How do you account for the fact that out of 550 commissars
in Russia only 17 are Russians?

"You must have leadership—not dictatorship. In England there is not a soul we
would follow. You must get a leader and define definitely what you stand for.

"I have discovered the spot for the segregation of the Jews. It is the only place in
the world—Madagascar. The map of the island shows it to be 1,000 miles long, and it
will hold 100,000,000 people. Segregation is the solution of our problem, and there is
the place for segregation of the Jews.”

96

A JEWISH CRIMINAL PLAN
by Adrien Arcand

"I think that all of us here are fighting Communism. I do it politically.

"Many times I have read in the press of this country and of my own, in all man*
Tiers of tides, that I am a Nazi and in the pay of Chancellor Hitler. So was it said of
my good friend Beamish. Well, Mr. Beamish began his work 40 years ago, and since
Chancellor Hitler is 44 years old, Mr. Beamish must have begun to receive Hitler’s money
when the latter was only 4 years old 1

"Being not a German nor in Germany, I cannot be a Nazi. And I am no more in
Hitler's pay than the great Edouard Drumont of France who fought the same fight for
50 years; no more in Hitler’s pay than the great Edward the First of England who
expelled the jews from his country in order to save it.

The more Communism has been fought in the last ten years, the more progress it
has made in our midst. There is a reason for it.

"Communism has been fought as an intangible whilst it is the most material thing
in this world.

"Communism is no doctrine, no set of principles. It is but a criminal plan.

"It is not by hazard that wherever Marxism comes to power, Jews also immediately
come to power. In Soviet Russia, out of 550 higher officials 88 per cent are Jewish.

"When it came to Spain we saw Azana and Rosenberg; in Hungary we saw Bela-
Kun, Szamueily, Agoscon and a dozen ocher Jews; in Belgium, Marxian Socialism brought
to power Vandervelde alias Epstein, and Paul Hymans, two Jews; in France, Marxian
Socialism brought forth the Jews Leon Blum, Mandel, Zyromsky; in Italy we' had seen
the Jews Nathan and Claudio Treves.

"Jews, in all their sacred and profane books, fanaticize themselves with the idea
that they are 'The Chosen People;’ that the whole world belongs to them by birthright;
that all Gentile races were made to be servants of Israel; that Jews must and will some
day own the whole wealth of this planet.

"How are they to get that wealth? If they use force, they know well that they will
be repelled by force.

"So, they have invented a devilish scheme.

"There is nothing in Communism but a Jewish conspiracy to grab the world.

"It is because Communism has not been fought for what it really is—a Jewish
scheme invented by Jews, profitable only to the Jews—that It has progressed against
all opposition to ic.

"One of Jew slogans is 'TOLERANCE/ which is the basis of the other slogan
‘No race, color or creed discrimination.’ The Jew has only to yell ’TOLERANCE,’ and
the whole of Gentility immediately becomes paralyzed.

"But what is Tolerance? It is a word used only for evil. Can you tolerate Virtue,
Good, Justice, Beauty? No, because they have rights by and in themselves. They exist
by right and not by tolerance.

"On the other hand, things that have no rights, as an epidemic of vice, a fault, a
defect, we tolerate.

"In consequence of it all, we have seen a handful of anti-Christian Orientals conquer
political, economic and social power in Occidental Christian countries.

"The world is not brought to Communism 'just like that/ and people won't re¬
nounce their property from night to day. There were long preparations for that stage.

"It began with the so-called democracy brought by the Jews through the llluminacti
one hundred and fifty years ago.

"Having a hold of the upper Internationale, the GOLD one, they got a hold of the
lower one, the proletarian; and they squeeze the bourgeoisie between the two, so as to
eliminate the only remaining national forces of resistance.

"One of your great patriots once said; Give me liberty or give me death/ I believe
in more than that, for liberty is not a thing to be demanded, but to be worked for, fought
for, WON.

"When a patriot can no more mention the enemies of his nation and faith without
being arrested—as has happened in this city—it is rime that people think of recovering
their lost liberty.

"Jews control 90 per cent of the world and national powers. They have but one
item more to get; POLITICAL POWER. They have the economic, that of propaganda,
that of International controls. AND COMMUNISM IS THE INSTRUMENT FOR
GIVING THEM THAT POLITICAL POWER.

97

an a 3S 3 ^

MO 'rrto°^ N y gratitude and P» fo “^

who, with, his personal experience b «n^*"£ yen y£ats _ 1 a dmire Beamish the more
engaged. He has schooled me f P neatest English families on the steps of

because he has been brought up m one ot th g & rhe hi her ranlcs 0 f

the English throne He could have had one o he J ,ae ^ c “ ok onlv for the release of

““ sss?== ":

^'sr? irffsj «®£5si£ S-; i-S5 - ~5

more than £540,000. up to j^ d to f] ee tw k e from machine guns in Montreal.

1 have had many trials with Jews. I had t complete destruction of linotypes—

^ thE fi * h ' ” f M '-

„„ ' l!,

have ma^v^ ^ ^ ^ ^ primed about iV I have readI aU^that Mj Edijondsmbas

-- sis. "VI gWr de,ai1 ’ ' han is the Edmoni '

“ S« f rtr P ^ mu? know it, as ,he dai.y papers will repor,

1 sfi b ri? s„ e r P ?uS S3 csss, to “. k ^f w™"?

rame they had no candidates. „ ttcetc

•■A COUNTRY THAT CANNOT FIND LEADERSHIP TO SAVE ITS ,

DESERVES TO FALL."

THE TREASON OF TOLERANCE

(An address by Robert Edward Edmondson before Members of The Amencan
Nationalist Party in New York, January 27, 1938)

The subject of this address is "The Treason of Tolerance." By its thought-
less preachment, great harm is bang done. ...

This Fetish of Tolerance is now our most deadly foe, for it is tantamoun
to Treason to Free Speech through indirect suppression.

We are heavily handicapped in combatting it, for we do not want to
antagonize a possible friend. Well does the enemy understand this psycholog),

and play upon it.

It is singular that tolerance is international at the source, and that it is

says Rabbi Freehof in "Race, Nation or Religion.

I warn patriots m this battle to beware of ALL
ism for it is used as a wearing-down diversion or process of attrition an
must understand that diversion is subversion, whether by frtend or foe.

In the final analysis, we are in a war between two. great elemental forces

_Nationalism, directed by Patriotism; and Internationalism, engineered by th

Jewish Economic System.

98

(Note: Our Republic is a great group of individuals, for mutual protection
merged into the single organism of an individual nation, among other nations,
each with individualized characteristics, which are the soul of real progress—
except where Communism has destroyed individualism and personal initiative
and leveled all individuals down into a mass bereft of intelligence, slavishly
surrendering national sovereignty to an internationalist World Government
like the "UN”.)

American citizens have tolerantly leaned over backwards until they got
"toleritis."—Was that the inspiration of Emma Lazarus' Statute of Liberty poem
calling upon the old world to "Send us the wretched refuse of your teeming
shores”?

We got that "refuse”!

Tolerance operates on a one-way street as handled by the majority. Minority
tolerance of the majority is flapdoodle.

At the expense of Gentility, Jewry huddles by itself, solidifies its unity,
nurses ics own interest first—and then unctuously calls for mutual tolerance.

Says Rabbi Krim in his booklet "Liberal Judaism and Liberal Christianity”:
"The chasm dividing Jew and Christian is too deep to make a meeting of the
two possible."

And yet the Jews call for tolerance of their "uniqueness.”

Zionist Leader Maurice Samuel says in his "You Gentiles” book: "Our
two ways of life are not merely different—they are opposed IN MORTAL
ENMITY.”

And in his next address Rabbi Wise beats his breast and bellows for more
tolerance.

When you find a poisonous snake in your home, do you TOLERATE it?
It is written that we should "Love Good and Hate Evil”—not that we should
tolerate evil.

Were the money-changers tolerated in the ancient temple—or were they
lashed out with a whip?

Virtue and truth have inherent rights. We do not tolerate rights. They
are unalienable. Evil has no rights. Why should we compromise with a deadly
enemy? Are we going to crucify ourselves on a Fetish of Tolerance double-cross?

"There is a limit at which forebearance ceases to be a virtue,” said the
great English statesman, Edmund Burke. We have PASSED THE LIMIT!

This campaign has been maliciously called an emotional program of hatred
of Jews. In reality, it is an educational-defense-crusade for God, Home and
Country.

True patriots love country unselfishly, and obey the High Command, to
hate, not jews, but the evil things their politico-economic System is doing to
destroy America.

We patriots want no evil violence against Jews; and we shall tolerate none
toward us of, by and for Jews.

Error lay in the fact that we did not fully take into consideration that the
"Great Power of the Press”—America's main medium for exchanging informa¬
tion—has been almost completely destroyed by the "Terrible Power of the
Purse.”

Let me give you a timely concrete example of the confusion-strategy tactics
of this enemy who ballyhoos tolerance.

99

Endowed with equipment to apply practically the principle: Publicity is
the Cure for Public Evils,” I conceived it to be my duty and privilege to hold
high the Torch of Truth in connection with the Jewish Problem.

For publicly exposing Jewish Communists, N. Y. Mayor LaGuardia in
June 1936 denounced me in the newspapers'as a religious bigot and fanatic.

Now "that’s all cockeyed,” to employ a Jewish wisecrack Is Communism
a religion? The Mayor had me indicted for alleged libel of ail persons of the
Jewish-Religion.” I was attacking Jewish Communists.

Are said "All Persons” communistic? Does gross materialism plus Com¬
munism equal atheism? Communist Leader Bukharin declared: Religion and
Communism are incompatible.” Therefore, Communism isn t religion.

Note that a religious indictment was brought for analyzing politico-

economics. ,

The Mayor called me a bigot. Did you ever hear of a man not a member
of any church branded "religious bigot?” My strong supporters include many
Catholics, Episcopalians, Presbyterians, Methodists, Lutherans, Christian Scien¬
tists, Mohammedans—at home and abroad.

’ He also branded me a fanatic. My principal business for more than 30
years has been that of politico-economic investment-analyst. Fanaticism and
the analytical judicial temperament are also fundamentally incompatible,

The real issue in the Edmondson Case is not libel. It is Freedom of the
Press But Tews it seems, cannot "tolerate” a Free Press, for the highest official
of the metropolis of America has arraigned Free Speech before the New

York Bar.

Today we are confronted with: "Survive or Perish”—as 1 Nation, as a
People, as a Civilization. It is just as simple as that—a question ot existence.

Now is the Eleventh Hour of Decision. We stand at the Cross Roads. The
Right leads to Freedom and Happiness. The Left goes down to slavery.

Which are YOU going to travel? I have made my choice—TO FIGHT
ON THE RIGHT FOR HONOR AND COUNTRY!

"WE ARE READY”

INSTRUCTIONS TO DEFENSE COUNSEL

New York, N. Y„ Jan. 28, 1938.

Dear Mr. Wise:

In the case of The People of the State of New York vs. Robert Edward
Edmondson, Indictment 209220, June 11, 1936, by a Jewish majority Grand
■Jury instigated bv Jewish Mayor LaGuardia of N. Y. City, alleging criminal
libel 5 of "all persons of the Jewish Religion” in news bulletins issued by him
devoted to exposing the IRRELIGIOUS Communistic politico-economic anti-
Americanism of the Jewish Financial System.

This is my formal authority as defendant, to you as counsel, with regard
to the defense-position Feb. 7.

Please state to the Court that the defendant is (1) prepared and ready for
trial- (2) that he is unable to consent with the prosecuting District Attorney
to any further postponement in view of the 20 months delay in this case, dur¬
ing any time of which the prosecution had power to try it; (3) that while he
may submit to postponement by court order, it will be under protest m conser¬
vation of his fundamental rights as outlined in Amendment VI ot the U., S.
Constitution, reading in part:

10 0

In all criminal prosecutions the accused shall enjoy the right to a SPEEDY'
and public trial, by an impartial jury * * * ”

In determining this procedure I have been guided by factors outlined be¬
low, in addition to the foregoing, as well as by the heavy expenses to which I
have been unfairly subjected through unnecessary delay.

It may be unique in criminal law for a defendant to seek trial; but this
case itself is historically unique, as well as outrageously farcical and a disgrace
to American jurisprudence. '

The Jewdsh minority people of the State now find themselves on the horns
of a dilemma. They do not really WANT this trial with its inevitable BOOM¬
ERANG exposures. Neither do they want dismissal. BUT THEY DO WANT
CONTINUED RESTRICTIVE PERSECUTION OF THE DEFENDANT
WITH ITS FINANQAL ATTRITION. They DO want SUPPRESSION OF
FREE SPEECH. And they are apparently in a conspiracy to effect such viola¬
tion of the Constitutions of the State of New Y r ork and of the United States.

For the Edmondson Defense or The Courts to be ACCESSORIES to such
continued Persecution, Suppression and Conspiracy would be a monstrous per¬
version of Justice. WE MUST NOT BE A PARTY TO THAT!

After more than a year’s consideration, you have assured the defendant
that, in yout opinion, he has acted within the law; that the important witnesses
summoned must testify in a way such as to justify his patriotic publications.

Furthermore, under the existing circumstances, another postponement "BY
CONSENT” would (1) unjustly deprive the defendant of his patriotic sup¬
port; (2) of his own self-respect; and (3) most important ot all. since they
are the real issues, seriously damage the great causes of Free Speech and
National Patriotism.

If the Court issues a postponement mandate, then, as a matter of right
and justice, ask that bail be returned, and that the defendant be released on his
own recognizance in view of the fact that he wants an impartial trial, and is
ready.

As I have repeatedly stated to you, this case offers the opportunity of ages
for bringing a gigantic inhuman subversion into the arena of corrective public
debate—my immediate objective—which would effect emancipation by peaceful
methods, instead of through Communistic civil war, as threatened.

If the court refuses dismissal, the defendant will appear before it with
clean hands, unafraid, prepared and readv to put before the jury THE WHOLE

TRUTH.

A FATEFUL DECISION

Before going into court, my wife and I talked the matter over. I said,
You must share with me the responsibility of saying Ready for Trial. If the
prosecution agrees, our entire modest fortune may be used in carrying the case
to the U. S. Supreme Court, I have decided on my course. What is your
judgment”?

"I know your decision,” my wife soberly replied. "Mine is the same. We
shall go into court with clean hands, unafraid, trusting to a Higher Power,
which I do not believe will desert us in this selfless fight.”

1 0 1

EDMONDSON TRIAL OFF AGAIN

On application of District Attorney Dewey's Office, the Edmondson
Jewish Religion criminal libel trial was again postponed by court order, on
Feb. 7, to April IS, 1938, despite the "We are ready" announcement of De¬
fense Counsel John S. Wise, Jr. Bail was reduced from $2,500 to $1,000.

Since Former District Attorney Dodge, according to the N. Y. Jewish Day
of June 10, 1936, admitted there was no law covering the situation, how can
the District Attorney's office EVER prepare a case when no offense was com¬
mitted? Editor Samuel Margoshes said:

"When months ago some of us appealed to District Attorney Dodge
against the torrent of anti-Semitic (Edmondson) circulars then inundating the
streets of New York, the answer was that he was powerless to cope with the
situation, UNPROVIDED FOR IN THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW'
YORK. '

AMERICANISM FOR AMERICA!

(A Feb. 10, 1938, address in part before American Nationalist Party in N. Y,
City, by Robert Edward Edmondson)

Two subjects are contained in this address. The first part analyzes Fascism,
the second, Alienism. I wish to put myself on record by the direct question and
answer form.

I am more and more frequently asked: Are you a Fascist?

The answer is: lam not. I am an American Patriot.

Are you in favor of Nazism for the United States?

No. That is for Germany.

Are you an enemy of Fascism or Nazism?

I am not.

Webster's International Dictionary of 1935 described "Fascism'' thus:
"An Italian organization originated by loyal patriots to oppose all radical
elements in the country, such as Bolshevists, Communists, and the like."

Do you believe Communism is Jewish?

I do. It is a tool used by the Jewish Politico-Economic System to subjugate
National Patriotism to the Jewish lust for power.

Once the American People grasp the idea that Jews and Communism are
allies; that Soviet socialistic motive-power is Jewish; that an alien element is
trying to overthrow' Americanism and substitute a poisonous anti-national doc¬
trine for it—the result will be no longer in doubt.

For America, I am against the Dictatorship Principle. Yet I will say this:
As the preservation of American institutions is worth any sacrifice, if some
temporary power-centralization becomes imperative in self-preservation, then
true American patriots will do at the last ditch what is necessary to save them¬
selves, their homes and their country.

ALIENISM: WHAT IS IT?

! now come to the second section of this address.

I find that some foreign-born citizens protest the use of the world "alien,”
holding that it refers to them.

If foreign-born men and women have their first papers, they are not aliens,
in the eyes of the law'.

Any citizen of the United States, native or foreign-born, who by action is
loyal to ’Americanism first, is definitely NOT an alien.

1 02

But think over this point: Any citizen of foreign descent who imagines
himself alien, IS NOT ALL-AMERICAN; for he has not yet absorbed true
Americanism,

Know your Constitution, Citizens of the Republic. Understand its Living
Principles, its Vital Force, its unparalleled Endowment of Individual Freedom.
Then give it the militant devotion it inspires in true patriots.

I repeat here the following declaration I made on Nov. 19 , 1933, during
an address before the American National Labor Party;

"We patriots did not START this fight—but we are going to finish it"!

ARMAGEDDON HERE?

An Invitation Address (in part) Before a'Patriotic Group of Over 200, at
the Home of Miss Caroline Mead at New Milford, N. J., on Feb. 14, 1938,
by Robert Edward Edmondson)

It is a high honor to be asked co appear before such a loyal group of real
Americans—men and women who, informally gathering in this patriotic home
in defense of their country, are willing to consecrate to it their lives, their
fortunes and cheir sacred honor.

It is not easy to find words to express my profound respect and deep ad¬
miration for the splendid type of American womanhood exemplified by Miss
Mead. A gentlewoman by birth and nature, she has boldly taken her stand.
Abusive and threatening attacks by the enemy have not weakened her high
resolve to defend, protect and preserve. I salute you, Caroline Mead, as one of
that fearless band which today is making history. It is such as you, weak in
physical force but strong in spirit, who really win the GREAT crusades.

We have been hearing much of late as to the next greatest war of wars.
Fellow-citizens, we are right now in the greatest war in ail history.

Two tremendous world elements confront each other. The Evil of Material¬
ism challenges the power of the Spirit of Good.

Your speaker is not attempting to preach a sermon. He is a hard-boiled
veteran journalist. He but employs the gifts of reportorial analysis and dramatic
publicity to accumulate facts and present them in understandable form to his
fellow-citizens, in the earnest hope that through enlightenment they may be
spared many unnecessary supreme sacrifices in this momentous struggle for
existence.

If you accept the theory that this is a war on materialism, you must also
accept my thesis that the solution for the Jewish Problem, which I believe to
be at the bottom of our troubles, is essentially ECONOMIC—not religious,
racial or individual so far as America is concerned.

Before my indictment nearly two years ago on the charge of libeling "all
persons of the Jewish Religion," my exposures of the enemy had been confined
to politico-economic subversions, holding that "the terrible power of the purse"
was the most deadly weapon of the Jewish System. Since then, in self-defense,
I have been forced to discuss the religious angle; finding that Jews always
conduct their destructive war against Gentility by hiding behind screens of
so-called racial and religious persecution.

These United States were Christian-founded. The Constitution of the
United States ends with this witnessing: "In the Year of Our Lord”—who was
Jesus Christ, not the Jewish Jehovah.

'"This is a Christian Nation,” is an extract from the "Holy Trinity" case
decision by U. S. Supreme Court per Justice Brewer, Feb. 29, 1892.

10 3

Now, do we intend to preserve such a righteous and precious heritage of
freedom, or shall we become the economic slaves of a materialistic minority
with an obsession to rule the world?

Patriarch Cristea, head of the Greek Orthodox Church, Rumania, was
quoted in an article in the N. Y. Herald Tribune Aug. 17, 1937, as follows:

"THE JEWS HAVE CAUSED AN EPIDEMIC OF CORRUPTION
AND SOCIAL UNREST. They monopolize The Press, which, with the aid of
foreign help, flays all the spiritual treasures of the Rumanians. To defend
ourselves is a NATIONAL AND PATRIOTIC DUTY—not Anti-Semitic.

'Lack of measures to get rid of this PLAGUE would indicate that we ate
lazy COWARDS who let ourselves be CARRIED ALIVE TO OUR GRAVES.

"Why should the Jew-s enjoy the privilege of living LIKE PARASITES
on our backs? Why should we not get rid of these parasites who suck Rumanian
CHRISTIAN BLOOD? It is logical AND HOLY to react against them.”

The LIBERATING POWER in this fight is FREEDOM OF THE PRESS.
The QUICK way to win is to establish a national daily newspaper which carries
NO ADVERTISING. Under patriotic editorial dictatorship, within six months
such a publication would have a 6,000,000 circulation and in a year would
prove to be the greatest financial investment ever offered tOjthe American
public—to say nothing of saving the Republic. For such a grand patriotic service
financial millions ought to rush, to defense.

In solution, this problem is definitely neither racial nor religious in Amer¬
ica. It is ECONOMIC. By sinister usurpation of key-posts the International
Jewdsh System has obtained control of our Financial Dynamo, New r York, and of
the Warburg-created Federal Reserve, which has enabled it to dominate our
Political Power Center, Washington, aided by advertising-subversion of the
Press. The rank and file of Americans do not yet realize that the whole country
is invisibly governed by a foreign element through the "terrible power of the
purse."'

All lew's are not deliberately subversive, but all are under a master-control
which victimizes its own people—the greatest regimented solidarity in the world.

Jews decline to publicly discuss the Jewish Problem. They enter a general
denial, refusing to be catechized. That is un-American. A Representative Re¬
public like ours cannot exist without freedom of debate. We demand public
solution of our problems by the Rule of Individual Reason—not through
Communistic violence.

Jews have been expelled from almost every civilized nation in the past.
That means segregation in the future.

Without ambition except to be of service to my country, I cater to no
leadership complex. I have never shirked responsibility—and shall not now m
this crisis. Believing that circumstances create and draft true leaders, I am
ready to co-operate with any patriotic group not wasting time with effects. 1
follow no policy that takes counsel with fear and compromise. No important
issue was ever won by ignoring The Truth. In this self-preservation fight,
pussyfooting is suicide, for we have "A Rendezvous With Death.”

In conclusion, Ladies and Gentlemen, let me say that the Scar Spangled
Banner will wave just so long as the Land o-f the Free is also the Home of the
Brave.

1 04

LECTURE ON AMERICANISM

(An Invitation Address (in part) delivered on Feb. 24, 1938, at che Fifth
Anniversary of the German-American Bund, New York City,
by Robert Edward Edmondson.)

A native American, I esteem it an honor, as a guest speaker, to address
tonight your German-American association, whose heroic brothers abroad held
back the red tide of Jewish Communism.

I am officially informed that every member of the Bund is a full citizen
of the United States, In addition to that, j. Edgar Hoover, Chief of the Federai
Bureau of Investigation, recently gave it a clc-an bill of health in a thousand-
page report declaring nothing anti-American could be found in the organization’s
activities.

Have you noted the latest news "FOR AND AGAINST,” in the N. Y.
City Communist Gerson Current Case?

''For” the DEFENCE: Simon W. Gerson and Gilbert Goodkind, Assist¬
ants to Manhattan Borough President Stanley M. Isaacs, with the N. Y. City
Jewish Lawyers Guild backing the bunch.

"For” the PROSECUTION: The American Legion by State Commander
Jeremiah F. Cross; Maurice Stember, State Legion Adjutant; Attorney S. M.
Birnbaum, who files ouster suit before N. Y. Supreme Court Justice B. L.
Shientag; Abraham Rosenblum, State Legion judge-Advocate— and who else
do you suppose? None other than Samuel Untermyer.

APPEAL-JUDGE: Gov. Herbert H. Lehman of N. Y. State.

What a howling farce! And Communist Leader Browder brands American
Legion tactics as Fascist. "Jews everywhere.”

Noting the singular set-up, since the Jewish Veterans Order bars Gentiles
from membership, patriots are wondering why American Legionnaires not only
admit but elect Jews to rule over them in their own camp? The American
Legion will futilely fight Communism twenty more years if it refuses to attack
the Jewish Cause.

Manhattan Borough President Isaacs says "The Communist Party is legally-
organized under the laws of the United States.” Yet in 1925 the party was out¬
lawed by the U. S. Supreme Court, whose verdict has not been enforced by
the Federal authorities for some secret reason.

We patriots -want no ’’thoroughly socialized democracy” like that de¬
manded by the Rabbinical Assembly of America as an "escape" from European
Communism and Fascism. Our Representative Republic suits us. The God of
our Fathers is the ONLY dictatorship Christian America will accept.

Are you a "Facist”?—I am asked. The answer is:

No. I am vigilantly PRO-American.

Briefly, I am an American Patriot.

Are you inclined toward Italian Fascism for America?

No. The dictatorship-regimentation thereof is un-American. In a bulletin
of April 22, 1935, headed. "Roosevelt Impeachable,” I charged that the "Liber¬
ties of our people had been Communistically suppressed and Fascistically cen¬
tralized” by the New Dealers.

Do you favor German Nazism for the United States?

I do not.

105

But—Nationalist, Fascist, Nazi or Vigilance, we ALL agree on the MAIN
issue in this self-preservation fight—we are And-jewish because the material¬
istic Jewish System is destroying our blood-bought liberties.

To his Army of Liberation my revered countryman, George Washington,
welcomed ihe great German von Steuben, the Polish hero Kosciusko, and the
French General Lafavette. What better example could an American patriot
emulate today than to welcome to this self-preservation fight against Inter¬
national Communism, the volunteer patriot-sons of German descent/

Then you stand to the last ditch for American Government under its
written Constitution?

I do. I believe, with Gladstone, that, as originally written, "it is the great¬
est document ever struck off by the hand and brain of man." It has been Com-
munisticaliy subverted while we patriots were off guard.

Do you believe rescue can be effected without supreme sacrifices?

No- It is our job to educate citizens to the danger as fast as possible.

George Washington the Father of Our Country, endorsed vigilance in
these warning farewell words: "The batteries of internal and external enemies
will be constantly and actively—often covertly and insidiously directed against
your Political Fortress. Watch over its preservation with JEALOUS care.

When the Washington Political Power Center becomes subverted—as it
has been by an alien "terrible power of the purse"—state communities must
form Patriotic Vigilance Committees to devise ways and means to recapture
rights wrongfully seized.

And when their priceless heritages have been rescued and restored, mili¬
tant American Vigilantes voluntarily return to the arts of peace their Principle
of Self-Government having been patriotically vindicated without the dangers of
a central dictatorship.

I will say this: If Communism does gain , the ascendency in the United
States, then it may be imperative temporarily to establish some form of central
coalition authority. To save Americanism is worth any sacrifice.

Let me repeat briefly: I am an American Vigilante Patriot, not a German
Nazi Patriot, nor an Italian Fascist Patriot. I am for Americanism in America.

I am an enemy of no patriot who is not at war with my country. I am an
enemy of Jewish Internationalists, who have no country, who are anti-national,
and who are making war on the United States.

And I am an eternal foe of those "two-fold more the children of hell’—
Gentile traitors who have betrayed country and race.

U. S. Constitution, Section 4 , Art. IV, provides:

"The United States shall guarantee to every state in the union a republican
form of government.’’ Our 48 republican states are not democracies.

Therefore, when Washington invades or usurps any of the functions of a
Republic State, the retained rights of the citizens are affected, and the citizens
owe a duty to each other to resist any such Federal subversion, using reserved

powers.

I am asked: Do you think we shall have to gee rid of the Constitution
before we can remove the Jewish Subversion?

I do not. Such an idea is born of brain-twisted propaganda.

1 0 6

By decision in the Supreme Court of 1878, Reynolds vs. the U. S., for
practicing polygamy, Mormons were deprived of citizenship, property rights
and other privileges granted by the Constitution, because such "religious prac¬
tice's" were held to be inconsistent with the American Political Philosophy and
dangerous to the peace and SAFETY of the State.

No minorities have constitutional special privileges in this countrv. Our
political plan contemplates a single organism. "Equal opportunity for all,
special privilege to none!"

When Jewish politico-economic practices are shown to be destroying the
peace and safety of the State, can there be any doubt that the citizen-majority
will protect itself by a Constitutional amendment specifically providing for
the disfranchisement and deportation of deadly alien internal enemies?

To those whose minds are not dosed, our enemies are not hard to identify.
Their own words confess the treason. Zionist leader Herzl admitted publicly in
England that Jews regard Gentiles as "A Common Enemy." Talmudic quota¬
tions say Jewry is "living in a state of war" with all other peoples. Chicago Rabbi
Freehof, m "’Race, Nation or Religion," says: "What stands in our way every¬
where in the world is modem NATIONALISM. That is' our chief enemy.'
The Chicago Jewish Sentinel of September 24, 1935, supports his attitude. "It
is the horrible figure of NATIONALISM, political and economic, which grins
and mocks at us everywhere."—London Jewish Chronicle of August 13, 1937.

Heed your hopes, fellow-patriots, not your fears. In this fight' for right,
have faith that lies will be burned to ashes by the Fire of Truth.

Irrevocably believing that true Americanism is worth any sacrifice, I stand
committed to militant and vigilant Patriotism against anti-national Inter¬
nationalism.

We Gentile people did not start this greatest war in all history.

We are NOT Aggressors—We are DEFENDERS!

AMERICAN NATIONALIST PARTY

Following is a self-explanatory statement made by Robert Edward Edmondson at the
March 17th, 1938, meeting of the American Nationals! Party in New York City:

In November, 193™, The American Nationalist Party (name selected later) was pro¬
posed by Stanley Alexander Smith of New Jersey to a number of New York anti-fewish
men,

As originally submitted to the group called by him, including Robert Edward
Edmondson, the plan was completely Fascist.

When asked for an expression of opinion Mr. Edmondson promptly announced that
he was a Constitutionalist, not a Fascist, and be could not therefore join such an
organization.

Mr. Edmondson also stated, however, that since all the group were apparently anti-
Jewish he would be willing to accede to their request to act as an unofficial advisor, and
speak as guest speaker from their platform when invited, provided he was allowed to
express his convictions freely; but that he could join no political party which omitted
to identify the cause of die Communism which is destroying the Republic.

Upon being requested to do so as an editor, Mr. Edmondson removed from the
Party platform ail the important Fascistic elements.

Robert Edward Edmondson now (April 18, 1938) wishes to say that, following
the resignation of all but one of the original officers of the Party, he also has withdrawn
all support from it; that while he spoke before it while it permitted Freedom of
Speech regarding the Jewish Question: he never joined it: that he will no longer speak
at any of irs meetings because of a recent statement that "good Jews" would be admitted
to membership.

1 0 7

CREATING UNPAYABLE DEBT
(Edmondson Call to Patriots March 16 , 1938)

Fellow-Patriots:

Arthur Kitson, the world’s greatest independent monetary economist, said
in the British National Review of March, 1935:

"The aim of the International Financiers is world control by the creation
of inextinguishable debt.” In correspondence with me, before he died recently,
Mr. Kitson made it clear that the International Financiers were Jewish, urging
me not to falter in this fight for self-preservation.

It may be remembered that reports were published in the newspapers in
1935 reproducing figures showing that the Roosevelt Jewish-Radical Admin¬
istration in three years had spent over 24 billion dollars, which equalled the
entire expenditure made by the Government during 124 years previous.

Commenting upon this, Washington Correspondent G. R. Brown, signifi¬
cantly published: "The whole New Deal crazy quilt seems to have a distinct pat¬
tern once the idea is accepted that huge expenditures have been made, not for
relief-public works recovery, but for the DELIBERATE purpose of CREATING
DEBT. Debt is ESSENTIAL to the New' Deal. Without it, a public opinion
appreciating the necessity of some day paying it off, could not be built up
sufficiently to endorse confiscation of wealth.’’

Now, taxes have approximated confiscatory figures. Doesn’t this prove the
truth of the old saying that "the power to tax is the power to destroy?"

Let me quote from the Congressional Record—the late Congressman
McFadden talking:

"There is not a man within the sound of my voice who does not know
that this country has fallen into the hands of the International Money Changers.
Why should the fact be hidden? Is it not because those who have betrayed the
United States are afraid to face the consequences?

"There has not been an administration since our advent into the great
world war in which Bernard M. Baruch has not been a chief political, economic
and financial advisor; AND EVERY ADMINISTRATION THAT LISTENED
TO HIM HAS CARRIED US DEEPER AND DEEPER INTO FINANCIAL
CHAOS.”

Are we in financial chaos now? Let me quote to you one single sentence,
pregnant with meaning, taken from a letter published in the N. Y. Post
March 9, 1938, signed "Bernard M. Baruch.” Here is the lacest Baruch
confession:

"I DID NOT CONDEMN ANY BIT OF LEGISLATION UPON THE
STATUTE BOOKS.”

According to that statement, he is FOR Communistic New Deal acts.

In "The Riddle of the Jews' Success" by Roederich-Stoltheim,we find this:
’’The enormous liberation of energy caused by the speculative principle of the
Jew, deceives as to the true state of affairs. The last reserves of national energy
are forced into action, which must end in exhaustion.”

ALL THIS SPELLS DEBT—UNPAYABLE DEBT! Created by Jewish
speculation with other people’s money through mortgages, instalment-buying,
financial shoe-string operations, and manipulation of gold.

Congressman Engel estimates chat the indebtedness of the railways, utilities,
industrials, farm mortgages, etc., is above seventy-three billion. He’puts the
grand total at 130 billions.

10 8

The National Industrial Conference Board estimates that the potential
national wealth of the United States is 286 billions. The assessed valuation of
that wealth is given by Congressman Engel at 134 billions. This is only four
billions more than the 130 billions indebtedness total. These estimates of debt
omit billions of short-term and instalment indebtedness, which must be
liquidated. {In 1953 it is proposed to raise the national debt to $300 billion,
which exceeds the total potential U. S. wealth.)

Debt-slavery? The interest payable on the tocal is estimated at more than
five billion dollars a year. You and I are paving that now "through the nose."
TO WHOM?

Are we solvent? Europe owes us billions of war debts—but they, too, are
UNPAYABLE. When merchants are insolvent, what happens? Repudiation!
Foreclosure!

The time has come for plain words, short, sharp. We patriots have hereto¬
fore been building leadership by putting informative knowledge into open
minds.

ONLY financial backing is necessary to restore our great heritage of
freedom, stolen from Americans in their sleep of fancied security. Our political
Judases have betrayed the people's sovereign power! They work under the
double-cross sign of the six-point Solomon star.

Tell these political parasites and subversionists that you will no longer
stand for such treason. Make them obey your orders—or GET OUT! You
middle-class men and women have the power! Use it!

Alien-minded elements have LOADED our judiciary as well as our
government administration. Has not the highest tribunal in the land been laid
low by the Poison of Liberalism?

"Jews in America constitute a great political force," says N. Y. Editor
Margoshes. They arc going to use it as they sec fit—what are YOU going
to DO about it?’

Criminal laziness, toleritis, sucker-generosity and limberitis are responsible
for our troubles. Put patriotic men in political jobs—and keep them there!
Out with "Yellows’’ as well as "Reds." If you continue to take it lying down,
you will get what you deserve—a communistic dictatorship.

No minority can stand against the aroused indignation of Majority
Americanism if the sources of that emotion are deep enough to produce militant
DEFENSIVE ACTION,

Fortune FAVORS the Brave!

Audacity! MORE Audacity! ALWAYS Audacity—Makes the enemy jittery!

Americans! BE YOURSELVES!

1 0 9

COURT DISMISSAL
FOLLOWS

JEWISH BACKDOWN

(Robert Edward Edmondson, Defendant, reporteJ as bc-!ow. under dare of

May 12, 1938)

Without warrant in law, following twelve "relief'' motion denials and six
tual postponements, the Edmondson-LaGuardia so-called religion libel indict¬
ment was unconditionally dismissed in a written opinion May 10, 193S. handc-d
clown by Judge James G. Wallace, after a 23-month Jewish juggling of justice
in N, Y. City, involving suppression of Free Speech in violation of State and
National Constitutions.

The most powerful Kahal in the world—the American Jewish Congress—
petitioned the Court April 14, 1938, to dismiss the indictment found by a

jewish-majoritv Grand Jury June 11, 1936, as being "against the public in¬

terest: thereby exposing Jewry as the true prosecution hiding behind the
technical title of the Case: "The People of the State of New York versus Robert
Edward Edmondson ' for alleged group libel of "All Persons of the Jewish
Religion."

Upon the application of the JEWISH "friends of che Court," the action
was dismissed on the same grounds pleaded by and for and denied to the

GENTILE defendant, filed with the Court ac the beginning, viz: ( 1 ) No

crime was committed under the law invoked; (2) There is no group libel
statute; (3) "in futherance of justice;" (4) "in che public interest;" (5) in
violation of the Freedom of the Press.

It is noteworthy that the District Attorney's brief did nor oppose the dis¬
miss-morions of the defense or the Jewish "friends of the Court."

The outcome is more than an individual triumph. It is a World Victory by
National Patriotism and Freedom of Speech over Internationa! Jewish Com¬
munistic Socialism.

Summoned before a Court of Law, the defendant appeared with "clean
hands. His conscience clear, he does not fear to face any impartial tribunal
with religious, moral or ethical jurisdiction; never having attacked any religion
as such in his patriotic publicity campaign.

As a matter of simple justice, Jewish Mayor LaGuardia, who was initially
lesponsible for this judicial crucifixion and received therefor the "American
Hebrew' Medal," should reimburse the defense for the $10,000 spent for legal
and other defense expenses, which forced the hiding prosecution to back down
and make the apologetic exposure-confession published. LaGuardia‘s assertion
Lhat the defendant's publications would incite to a breach of the peace, was
disposed of by the court declaring that as no violence had occurred during
the period covered, none was apparently likely. The truth of the matter is,
Jewry didn’t dare face damning evidence in a Court of Law'.

But the Jewish Socialistic System will HAVE to appear before the Bar of
Patriotic Public Opinion.

. The defendant will continue his Free Speech educational publicity, NOT
against any religion, but against the International Jewish Socialism that is com-
munizing The Republic.

Decision handed down in part below is by Judge Wallace, May 10, 1938;

Recently, when this case appeared on the calendar, motions were made bv
attorneys for the American Committee on Religious Rights and Minorities, the

1 1 0

American Jewish Committee, the American Jewish Congress, the Human
Relations Committee of the National Council of Women and the American
Civil Liberties Union, asking leave to be permitted to intervene as amicus
curiae and to file briefs.

In these briefs, the attorneys state their belief that sound public policy,
looking to the safeguarding of the rights of free speech, of a free press and of
religious liberty, makes it highly desirable that the court, in furtherance of
justice, on its own motion, dismiss the indictments against this defendant.

It has been urged that the prevailing rule in England, based on the old
case of Rex v. Osborne (1732, 2 Barn. K. B. 1663) supports the theory that a
criminal libel can be based upon a defamatory statement concerning such an
extensive community. I do not agree with this conclusion.

Putting aside the consideration of the rational basis of criminal prosecution,
for libel, I am of the opinion that the soundest rule that has been enunciated
on the subject of group libel is this: that an indictment cannot be predicated
upon defamatory writings assailing a class or group, unless directly, or by inv
piication, some individual is libeled.

There is certainly nothing in the law of this State, nor in any of the cases
cited, which justifies a finding that an indictment will lie, based on defamatory
matter directed against so extensive and indefinable a group or class as "all
persons of the Jewish Religion.”

There can be no doubt as to the defamatory nature of the publications
mentioned in che instant indictment. They are palpably the outpourings of a
fanatical and bigoted mind.

Nevertheless, they (defendant publications) have been circulated for years
and have never provoked a breach of the peace in this community, nor, in
spite of their virulence, are they apt to.

After a consideration of the briefs submitted by the people, the defendant
and amicus curiae, the court, on its own motion, and in the furtherance of
justice, dismisses Indictment No. 2092 20, which charges the defendant with
libeling all persons of the Jewish Religion.

(Signed)

JAMES GARRETT WALLACE,

Judge of the Court of General Sessions

"MUDDLED THINKING"

Referring to the comment of the Court, that the publications of the de¬
fendant " are palpably the outpourings of a fanatical and bigoted mind;’'
defendant believes that if the Judge knew' w'hat the defense knows, he would
have omitted such dicta-by-taik of no legal value. The defendant also wonders
how can a non-churchman be a religious bigot; and how can an investment-
analyst be a fanatic—since fanaticism and the analytical or judicial tempera¬
ment are incompatible.

Maintaining the "Conspiracy of Silence" policy of The Press by ignoring
the real issue of Free Speech, which, as a newspaper, it should champion, the
N. Y. Herald-Tribune of May 12, 1938, commented editorially:

"In dismissing three indictments charging criminal libel against Robert
Edward Edmondson, Judge James Garrett Wallace wrote an opinion which,
because of its clarity and the importance of the issue involved, deserves to be
read and re-read as a tonic to the present epidemic of muddled thinking. The
pertinent part follows: 'When one realizes how many forms of religion might

1 X 1

consider themselves libeled and seek legal redress, were our laws so extended,
and when we reflect on how our courts might, in such event, fma themselves
forced into the position of arbiters of religious truth, it is apparent that more
would be lost than could be gained by attempting to protect the good name of a
religion bv an appeal to the criminal law.'

Now', it may disturb the "muddled thinking" of the Herald-Tribune to
find chat the defendant, in principle per se, announces that he is in entire
harmony with the quoted paragraph from the Court s purely by way of dicta
by-talk'of "no legal value’—in its excursion away from jurisdiction of
LAW into the field of Morals-Ethics-Religion; but the aefendant wonders
if such diversion does not violate the fundamental American doctrine as to
separation of Church and State, Politics and Religion.

The defendant is supremely confident that time and the logic of events
will completely vindicate his response to the Call of Public Duty.

BRIEF OF DEFENDANT, by Defense Counsel John S. Wise, Jr., said:

There is no crime of libeling "all persons of the Jewish Religion. _

The Court stated that Counsel had not submitted any* brief showing it was
not a crime to attack any Religious Group. There is no such decision m the

Unit THECOURT SHOULD EXERCISE ITS POWER TO DISMISS THE
INDICTMENT IN FURTHERANCE OF JUSTICE. , .

The Indictment is absurd on its face. The return of it was notmng less
than abuse of process by a Grand Jury dominated by a majority of alien-
minded members as shown by the affidavits submitted on defendants motion

to inspect the minutes. , , , c c

The District Attorney has conceded that by Clause 1 of Section 37/ of

the Code of Criminal Procedure, no Jew or person connected with any Jew

can serve on the Trial Jury. He has said to read the indictment will take four

dayS ' Inspection of the alleged libelous documents will show the Court they are
the result of study of the literature and Press of the Universe; and as proof of
defendant's justifiable motives and honest belief in the truth of his statements
he would have the right to occupy the time of this Court and the Jury to read into
the record a mass of material without end. There is no telling how many weeks
or even months the trial might consume.

AND THERE WOULD BE NO POSSIBILITY OF SECURING A
SETSTAINABLE CONVICTION.

The trial would develop racial and religious antagonism that would rock
the foundations of this community. The expense of such a trial would be all
out of proportion to any possible good to be accomplished.

All the reasons for dismissal in the briefs amicus curiae are good.

AN APOLOGETIC CONFESSION
(Jewry Unmasks Itself as the Real Prosecutor)

After ">2 months of trial postponement, the surprise-documents quoted in part here¬
inafter were submitted to Judge James G. Wallace Apr,! U 1938, as friends of the
court” by the American Jewish Congress, American Jewish Committee, American Com¬
mittee on Religious Rights and Minorities, and the American Civil Liberties Union. ^

The "Tewishness” of the "American Committee on Religious Rights and Minorities
is shown by these General Committee names: Rabbi S. S, Wise, Henry Morgenthau Sr.,
ludlte Julian W. Mack, Abram I. Elkus, Arthur Hays Salzburger; Attorneys Morns
Ernst and Arthur Garfield Hays (Haas); National Committeemen B. Charney Vladeck,
Rabbi A. H. Silver, A. J. Muste, Joseph Schlossburg, and others,

1 1 2

AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION

Prosecutions like this tend to restrict traditional freedom of speech and press. The
liberties of expression guaranteed by the Constitution are not limited to anv particular
held. They include the right to express opinion upon anv subject, political social or
religious. ’ “

said in his dissenting opinion in U. S. vs. Schwimmer 2"9

b 654, hut it there is any principle of the Constitution that more imperative!',-
calls for attachment than any other, it is the principle of free thought—not free thought
for those who agree v.-tth us hut freedom for the thought that we hate.’

The proper remedy for ignorant and misleading doctrines is not suppression but
enlightenment. As Mr. Justice Brandeis said in his dissenting opinion in Whitney
vs California. 2/4 U. S. 357. 3W: 'If there be time to expose through discussion the
falsehood and fallacies, to avert the evil bv the processes of education the remedy to
be applied is more speech, not enforced silence. "

(Defendant has photostat of a Sept. 18, 1936. letter from the ACLU to Judge N W
Rogers of Tompkins Corners, N. Y.. saying:

We have discussed very fully our attitude to the prosecution of FdmorcNon We
have conferred with his counsel and looked up the law. When the indictment was'first
brought it was, in our judgment, clearly a case violative of the Free Speech guarantee

for unlike ordinary criminal libel cases it did not specify persons libeled. The indierment

was Liter changed to specific complainants, and thus the defect was cured." The letter
was signed by Roger N. Baldwin, Director, who served a term in a Federal prison as
a draft dodger, and whose exclamation "Communism is the goal," is notorious.

Defense Counsel John S. Wise. Tr.. wrote Judge Rogers Oct. 1, 1936. saying that
Baldwin had not conferred with him, as stated. The religion-indictment 209220 was
never changed, as represented).

AN INVOCATION TO TOLERANCE

The Memorandum below was Submitted on Behalf of The American Committee on

Religious Rights and Minorities, The American Jewish Committee. The American

Jewish Congress, and The Human Relations Committee of The National Council of
Women.

These organizations are concerned with the fundamental question, whether the cause
of rehgious liberty and tolerance will be advanced by this particular prosecution, and
desire to lay before the court in briefest possible form their views in reference thereto

(A) There is danger that such use of the criminal libel laws will ultimately react
against the very minorities sought to be protected by undermining or abridging tht
traditional and constitutional right to freedom of speech and of the press, This danger has
recently been pointed^ out by 'The Christian Century" which, commenting editorially on
the case at bar. stated in its issue of December 1, 1937;

"The number one anti-Semite of America. Mr. Edmondson, is reported as about to
be tried for libeling the Jewish religion. " * S; It may be said without malice that Mr.
Edmondson's statements, especially ahour the Jewish religion, but also about many persons,
have been so intemperate, so devoid of probable foundation and so wildly defamatory
that it would be a pleasure to see him punished by any legal means. But it seems
doubtful whether a charge of libel against a religion can'be‘‘sustained, and it- is still
more doubtful whether it would be to the public interest in the long run for it to be
sustained. It is of the utmost importance that there be freedom of discussion and of
criticism in religion and in politics."

(B) The statute itself does not bv its terms cover group libel, nor do any of the
reported cases in New York hold that an indictment for criminal libel will lie where
the group libelled is as broad as that here defamed.

(C) It is doubtful if a conviction would be m the public interest. Efforts would be
made to have it appear that the defendant was a "martyr" to the great cause of civil
rights.

In sum, the organizations submitting this memorandum are convinced that the true
and effective reply to the propaganda of bigots lies not in the invocation of criminal
libel laws bur in a campaign of education.

Section 671 of the Code of Criminal Procedure provides: "Court may order indict¬
ment to be dismissed. The court may, either of its own morion, or upon the application
of the district attorney, and in furtherance of justice, order an action, after indictment,
to be dismissed. If the Court feels that a termination of this prosecution is "in further¬
ance of justice," it may upon its own motion dismiss the indictment, with a written state¬
ment of its reasons for so doing. Under the statute, such a statement by the Court is
filed as a public record, which becomes and remains the official pronouncement of
this Court.

1 1 3

JEWRY ADMITS NO LAW WAS VIOLATED

The foregoing documents enter a typical "general denial" of defendant's
publication charges, unsupported by any specific refutations—the usual Jewish
"reply’’ to unanswerable accusations. But it will be noted that it confesses that
the defendant DID NOT VIOLATE ANY LAW.

From the beginning the defense contended that the indictment was with¬
out warrant in law since no offense was shown. Does it make a difference
"whose ox is being gored?"

It is interesting to note that most of the legal authorities quoted by the
persecution in this case were cited by the defense in previously uenied relict
morions, totalling 12 in ail.

The brief completely ignores and fails to reply to the defendant s un¬
answerable accusation of Communistic Jewish Anti-Americanism—which REAL
issue therefore still stands unchallenged.

Their own RUTHLESS INTOLERANCE having been ^uncovered, they
now shamelessly pose a hypocritical role of "holier than thou.”

Does this panicky move to have the indictment nullified imply that the
so-called Jewish religion cannot endure the Searchlight of Truth.- Jewry
created an unprecedented opportunity to defend Judaism—but sidestepped
at the appointed hour.

The briefs properly advocate a campaign of EDUCATION in place of
court action. "The Edmondson movement has been primarily and essentially
a campaign of enlightenment to fortify leaders with fact and authority de¬
clared the defendant in Indictment Bulletin 26 of April 1, 1936.

In fine, the verdict of the American Jewish CONGRESS is tantamount
to a legalistic repudiation of the indictment brought by the Jewish-Majority
Grand Jury—suggestive of liability under U. S. Criminal Code Sections 19 and
43-

The JEW "apologizes” this time—not the White Man! It is a "run to

cover 1 . 1 '

CHRISTIAN CENTURY ATTACKS JEWISH RELIGION

The Christian Century, which is quoted in the above memorandum as
denouncing the defendant Dtc. 1, 1937, itself nevertheless printed on June 9,
1937, the following "theological'’ attack on the so-called Jewish Religion AS
SUCH:

"Judaism rests upon an IMPOSSIBLE BASIS. It tries to pluck the fruits
of democracy WITHOUT YIELDING ITSELF to the processes of democracy.
Democracy cannot guarantee our Jewish brethren against the emergency of A
CRISIS in which prejudice and anger generated by THEIR LONG RESIST¬
ANCE to the democratic processes, may flame up to their great hurt. The situ¬
ation in which the Jewish Problem rises is in large measure of JEWRY'S OWN
CREATION. The root cause is the Jew’s immemorial and pertinacious OB¬
SESSION WITH AN ILLUSION that his race and people are the object of
the special favor of God, who requires the maintenance of their racial integrity
and separateness. Their idea of an integral race HAS ITS PROTOTYPE IN
NAZISM.”

The parallel is deadly!

Notwithstanding Jewish and duped Christian misrepresentation thereof,
the. defendant’s patriotic politico-economic exposures were directed, without
hate, to defend-protect-preserve the peace and safety of the constitutional state
SPECIFICALLY against irreligious Jewish-Communist subversions thereof.

1 14

Until the publisher was indicted, he gave little publicity-attention to
Jewish Talmudic doctrine; but in order thereafter to prepare his defense, he
investigated and published his documentary findings.

In this great battle, TWO MEN—Editor Edmondson and Lawyer Wise
—ARMED WITH THE SPIRIT OF TRUTH, have beaten down wealthy
World Jewry on its own materialistic ground.

Since EVERY ONE of the many "relief motions" made by the defendant
during. 22 months delay were UNIFORMLY denied, this retreat was forced,
NOT in a Court of Law, but by "The Great Power of The Press" through
Defense Pamphlets dramatically exposing the LAW WEAKNESS of the
prosecution.

BACKDOWN BETTER THAN TRIAL

Upon receiving defendant's message that the Court had officially dis¬
missed all indictments, Adrien Arcand of Montreal, Leader of the National
Unity Party, head of the Canadian patriotic movement, and highest authority
in North America on the Jewish Problem, immediately wrote as follows:

"The backdown on your case is the first real great defeat of the World
Kehilla. They refused to carry on, on the very ground they themselves chose. It
never happened before anywhere. Jt is an admission of defeat, jitters and in¬
capacity GREATER THAN ANY COURT JUDGMENT COULD HAVE
BROUGHT, for they have done the judging themselves, on law as well as on
facts. Nothing can erase the outstanding document brought forth by their most
powerful organizations.

What a Victory! What a Victory! Bigger and more significant than any
previous in the history'of the legal Jewish question.

"One thing to be pointed out is: American Justice (?) REFUSED TO'
JUDGE YOUR CASE ON ITS MERITS. It judged according to the pleas of
a third party. And the Court granted to a third party a demand it has refused
to grant to the defendant. I have never met with such an instance in any case.

"You emerge victor with a spotless sword from one of the greatest fights
ever waged — that of an international super-wealthy and powerful combine
against,a single man with truth and moral courage. If the Jews had had even
a shadow of right or truth, they could have won. And if thousands Of cowering
and timid 'anti-Jews' had been in the place of Edmondson, they would have
given in long ago. I hope your triumph will awaken them. There is hope, in
your country, as long as there will be ONE man of your type.

I PREFER THE ISSUE AS IT CAME. A trial would cost 'unfindable'
money, and with whatever result, could not have brought such a stirring result.”

The defendant is speechless before such praise from so high an authority.

A ROLL OF HONOR

In this hour of triumph the defendant pays tribute to courageous patriots
named below, at home and abroad, who faithfully stood up publicly beside him,
an instrument:

Marian Louise Edmondson, wife of the defendant; John S. Wise, Jr., of
New York City, Defense Counsel; Captain Henry Hamilton Beamish’ of
England, World Dean of this Liberation Movement; Adrien Arcand of Canada,
head of the National Unity Party;Col. U. Fleischhauer, famous Protocol Expert-
William Kullgren of the "Beacon Light," Atascadero, Calif.; A. N. Field of
New Zealand, author of "All These Things,” James True, Washington Pub¬
lisher of Weekly Industrial Reports; super-patriot Editor Arnold S. Leese, of

1 1 5

England; Editor McDermott of the London "Patriot;" Editor Gerald B. Win-
rod of "The Defender" of Kansas; George L. Pafort of N. Y. City, who served
subpoenas on the-."Princes of Jewry in the Edmondson Case.

In grateful acknowledgement, the defendant raises his hand in Silent
Salute to that noble and faithful-band of known and unknown women and
men whose financial and other substantial contributions helped to bear the
heavy sacrificial burden of this grueling battle in the Courts of the Law and
before the Bar of Public Opinion.

To the TEN MILLION Americans who. through the Edmondson Publicity
Crusade have learned THE CAUSE of the Communizing activities which
have been wrecking The Republic, the defendant extends patriotic felicitations
directing-attention to the fact that the Edmondson triumph has tna/ed the trail
for militant patriots of the Nation, who need no longer fear prison for
patriotically employing Free Speech, Free Press and Free Assembly so long as
[hey concentrate on the subversive SYSTEM. (The court established a legal
"group libel" precedent in American jurisprudence.)

As a Fellow-Vigilante, the defendant hails the Patriotic Vigilantes of
America, and calls upon them to "Rescue The Republic! ’ To them !he declares
that this is not a mere Edmondson victory; but a COMPLETE INDICA¬
TION of the thesis that our great constitutional form of government STANDS
OR FALLS with Freedom of Speech, Press and Assembly; that Treason to
Free Speech is TREASON TO THE STATE.

ON WITH THE FIGHT FOR RIGHT!

NOT AN AMERICAN BUT A JEW!

"I AM NOT AN AMERICAN CITIZEN of Jewish Faith! I AM A JEW!
I have been a Jew' for 4000 years! Hitler wuis RIGHT—WE ARE A PEOPLE!
The object of the AMERICAN Jewish Congress is to defend JEWISH fights
at home AND ABROAD, of ALL JEWS—and to defend American DEM¬
OCRACY!"—Rabbi Stephen S. Wise (Weisz), N. Y. Times 6-13-38.

The following is from June 15, 1938, Bulletin:

You will observe from the quotation that this Austrian-born rabbi, one of
the most important Jew's in America, in an astonishing Declaration of Principles,
declares Jews are "A People;” and implies that, as such, they come BEFORE

AMERICANISM. ,, . „

"I am a Jew first, then a Democrat"—Jewish Aldermanic President

Jacob M. Harvey—Chicago American of April 6, 1936.

You w'ill also observe that ALL Jews—good AND bad everywhere are
to be protected bv The AMERICAN Jewish Congress, under the Rabbi Code.
Nothin* is said about Citizenship DUTIES to the U. S. (or elementary Justice.)

THE COMMUNIST PARTY ALSO ANNOUNCES ITS SUPPORT OF
DEMOCRACY. Q.E.D.: "Communism is JEWISH!"

Americanism is a single organism. Those w'ho refuse to be absorbed or
assimilated into it are ALIEN, and MUST BE REJECTED as poison.

Jewish anti-Americanism certainly makes Jews unfit for American citizen¬
ship' and when their most prominent and leading rabbi publicly admits that
he is a Tew BEFORE HE IS AN AMERICAN, WHY SHOULD ANY JEW
NOW HOLD PUBLIC OFFICE WITH JURISDICTION OF LIFE AND
DEATH OVER GENTILES?

116

The solution of the Jewish Problem is: Disfranchisement and Deportation
to Madagascar. This can be done by U. S. Constitutional Amendment on the
ground that Jewish Anti-Americanism constitutes a danger to the "peace and
safety of the state."

ADDENDA

Former President Theodore Roosevelt, addressing the American Defense
Society January 5, 1919: "We should insist that if the immigrant who comes
here in good faith, becomes an American AND ASSIMILATES HIMSELF
TO US, he shall be treated on an exact equality with every one else; for it is
an outrage to discriminate against ANY SUCH MAN because of creed birth¬
place or origin. BUT, THIS IS PREDICATED UPON THE MAN BE¬
COMING IN VERY FACT AN AMERICAN AND NOTHING BUT AN
AMERICAN. If he tries to KEEP SEGREGATED WITH MEN OF HIS
OWN ORIGIN and separated from the rest of America, then HE ISN’T
DOING HIS PART AS AN AMERICAN. There can be no DIVIDED
ALLEGIANCE here. * * * We have room for but one flag, and this excludes
the RED FLAG, w’hich symbolizes all wars against liberty and civilization. We
intend to see that the crucible turns our people out AS AMERICANS of
American NATIONALITY."

"The Jew remains a Jew—Assimilation is impossible"—Ludwig Lewi-
sohn, Jewish author of ''Israel,” 1926 .

N. Y. Supreme Court Justice Samuel I. Rosenman, "Rooseveit’s Right
Arm," "Sharply attacked assimilationist plans” at the Council of Jewish
Federations in Philadelphia—N Y. Times of Feb. 1, 1936.

The following is from a speech delivered by Eric H. Louw, Feb. 24, 1939,
tn the South African House of Assembly, on the "Alien & Immigration" bill:

I find in ’The Book Of Jewish Thoughts' by Dr. J. H. Hertz. Chief
Rabbi of England, this statement: 'What I understand by assimilation is loss of
identity. It is the kind of assimilation I dread most, even more than pogroms.' ”
(Pogroms kill but few Jews—assimilation would be mass "Genocide.”)

"Basil M. Henriques, a Distinguished Jew, made a speech in London
reported in the Zionist Record of South Africa, Jan. 29 , 1939, saying: 'There
must be no assimilation. We are a peculiar people, and a peculiar people we
must remain.’ ”

RABBI THANKED — AND WARNED!

Open Letter of August 1, 1938 to Rabbi Louis D. Gross, Editor Brooklyn
Jewish Examiner.

Many thanks. Rabbi, for the free publicity you gave me in your weekly of
July 22, 1938, in three-column front-page article, containing a picture that looks
like me about as much as you do. It is ail the more appreciated because the
American Hebrew announced sometime ago it would not even mention me
anymore. Evidently, it dosen’t believe in Free Speech for all citizens.

Another sequence that deserves special notice is that in one of your last
year’s issues you put me in what you called your "Rogues’ Gallery.” Now,
apparently I have been honored by promotion. Is this action in recognition of
the unconditional dismissal May 10, 1938, of the Jewish court charge against
me of libeling "All persons of the Jewish Religion,’' because I publicly exposed
Communism as Jewish in origin and direction; the throwing out of the case
being on the ground that I was merely exercising my American Right
of Free Press—just as you are doing in foolishly trying to make me a Hitlerite;

1 1 7

whereas, instead of being a German Nazi PATRIOT, or an Italian Fascist
PATRIOT, or a Japanese Nationalist PATRIOT? I am a militant American
Vigilante Patriot defending my country against Jewish Internationalism.

But I suggest. Rabbi, that you watch your publication steps. In exercising
Free Speech, libel guilt surely lies in misrepresentation. Your article of July
22 quotes the court thus: "It’is necessary to bear with the fanatical ravings of
SUCH SCOUNDRELS AS EDMONDSON because the greater principles of
Free Speech and Free Press are involved.”

M I have before me the judge’s decision, I challenge you to produce such
a quotation therefrom. The court carefully avoided calling the defendant a
"scoundrel”—which the dictionaries define as "knave, swindler, villain.” Can
you legally sustain such an allegation, Rabbi?

Further. "The Examiner's” article says my activities have brought me into
"contact with the law on more than one occasion.” Just what law? The Jewish
Code—or American Code? Careful, Rabbi!

But I feel kindly toward your "Examiner.” for my patriotic crusade against
Jewish Anti-Americanism received some of its high-explosive ammunition from
it, notably in the issue of Oct. 20, 1933, wherein you said that the Roosevelt
Administration has appointed more Jews to office-than any other in American
History,” naming Bernard M. Baruch as "Unofficial President.” Although
when I showed that article to President David Brown of the American Hebrew
in 1934, in support of my exposure-campaign, he snorted: They don t know
what they’re talking about. We’ll put 'em out of business;” but you’re still on the
job.

Now, while I am not a churchman and cannot truthfully be branded a
religious bigot, it seems to me suggestively sinister to find Rabbis—who pose
among the Christian Clergy as "Men of God”—engaged in a racket such as
spreading reprehensible matter of the evil character I have outlined. Perhaps
the answer is to be found in John 8:44, which has caused European students
of the Jewish Problem to conclude that "Christ was the greatest ‘Anti-Semite’
of all time,”

It is confessed in your article: "Anti-Semitic propaganda in the U. S.
today is MORE WIDE-SPREAD AND POWERFUL THAN IT WAS IN
GERMANY AT THE TIME OF HITLER’S ADVENT TO POWER. Today
American Jewry DARE NOT overlook rhis.”

That is substantially correct, Rabbi, except you should substitute "Anti-
Jewish” for "Anti-Semite.”

BE WARY, AMERICANS!

{From Edmondson bulletin of Sept. 1, 1938)

FELLOW-PATRIOTS:

Americanism is neither Nationalism, nor Democracy nor Communism,

While Patriotism is the basis on which rest Americanism, Fascism, Nazism,
Nationalism, its practical application differs in the U. S.

True Americanism is Patriotic Individualism. It is for personal progress
first, The supreme objective of Americanism is the good of the individual first,
through ordered liberty. The supreme objective of the Socialist-Communist-
Paternalist Philosophies is the good of the state first, through regimentation of
the individual.

The United States of America are not a nation like those of Europe. They
are A UNION federated for common State welfare and protection against

1 1 8

external enemies. This federation is not a nation otherwise.’ It is unique in the
history of the world. The 48 states retain THE MAJORITY of their soverign
or "national” rights. They delegated to Washington only 18 specific "national”
powers.

AMERICANISM HAS A DUAL ALLEGIANCE—First, To The State;
Second, to the Washington "National” Government. Citizens of other countries
have a SINGLE allegiance—to a Central Authority.

The checks and balances of the American Political system were designed
to defeat communistic subversions, as well as those of plutocratic enemies of the
Republic. States Rights are essentially MAJORITY RIGHTS since only a
limited number of national powers were delegated to the central sub-national
(not super-national) government at Washington. Such retained majority rights
constitute a safeguard against usurpation by a powerful minority, for a highly
centralized government is easily subverted by such an element. Not so 48
sovereign states acting independently in self-preservation. When the central
national government is subverted by faithless political servants, as at present,
then state citizens automatically become virtual militia — Vigilantes — armed
with sovereign rights and power recalled and reassumed.

Hence, ultimate power resides in the American Home; for Washington is
merely a sub-agency without nationalistic jurisdiction except as to certain
carefully indicated and restricted powers. It has no other authority over the
INDIVIDUAL STATES.

The attempt of the Roosevelt Regime to transfer supreme power from the
Sovereign States to Washington was designed to destroy the American System
of ordered INDIVIDUAL LIBERTY by subjugating it to a highly centralized
SUPER-NATIONALISM, easily undermined by an organized minority. New
Deal legislation is directed toward breaking down the majority rights retained
by the States.

Americans want no MASTER-Leadership because such dictatorship destroys
their Individual Initiative, their personality, their self-reliance, liberties, equal
opportunities, freedom of action and progress as a people. But uninformed
American Individualism is still unorganized in the greatest crisis in its history.
The Fetish of Tolerance has lulled vigilance into fancied security. Aroused,
the Spirit of Thought moves far more rapidly than Physical Materalism. It took
Communists more than 25 years to get headway. With proper enlightenment,
American Individualism can be in concerted action "over night.”

The SOUL of Americanism faces crucifixion. On its rebirth hangs the
fate of The Union. For Individualism, the preservation of Americanism is
worth ANY sacrifice.

BE WARY, AMERICANS! And when invoking Militant Patriotism to
fight Communism and its allies, be vigilant not to fall in the Hidden Pit of a
false Super-Nationalism whose Paternalistic Co-operative "Social Justice” End*
Product is ALSO REGIMENTATION, the deadly foe of Americanism.

ZIONISTS DISLOYAL TO U. S.?

The following is from a Sept. 7, 1938, Edmondson publication;

"Speaking as an American, I cannot for a moment concede that one can
be AT THE SAME TIME A TRUE AMERICAN AND AN HONEST
ADHERENT OF THE ZIONIST MOVEMENT.

They who believe in and hope and labor for an ultimate restoration of
Jewish Political life, and the re-establishment of a Jewish NATION, place A
PRIOR LIEN upon their citizenship which * * * WOULD PREVENT
THEM FROM MAINTAINING ALLEGIANCE TO THE COUNTRY OF
WHICH THEY NOW CLAIM TO BE GOOD CITIZENS.”

1 1 9

The foregoing confession appeared in the N. Y. Sun of Sept. 4. 1907, in
a communication from Isadore Singer, quoting a letter from the late Jacob H,
Schiff, of Kuhn, Loeb Sc Co., dated Aug. 8, 1907, addressed to Prof. Solomon
Schechter, President of the Jewish Theological Seminary, relative to the settle¬
ment of the Jews in Palestine under the Political Zionist Ideal.

Zionism is Jewish Nationalism"—Rabbi S. S. Wise. Jewish Sentinel of
Chicago, Sept. 29, 1933.

Judge Julian Mack, in his Presidential address to the 1919 Zionist Con¬
vention, declared; "Beyond all question, to put it mildly, NINE-TENTHS of
the Jews of America are Zionists.’’

The foregoing is on Page 57 of "Modern Palestine," ?. book by Jessie E.
Sampter, a Jewess author, Julian W. Mack is a prominent N. Y. jurist.

On Page 53, same book, appears; "Jews are a distinct nationality, of
which every Jew, whatever his country, his station, or shade of belief, is neces¬
sarily a member."—U. S. Supreme Court Justice L-. D. Brandeis.

"We Jews in the House of Commons, whatever our political opinions may
be, will always stand in that assembly for the rights of the Jewish Community."
(Emanuel Shrnwell, Jan. 23, 1929, vide the London "Patriot" July 18, 1929).

"Jews who settle in Palestine become citizens of this Jewish Common¬
wealth. But a scheme has now been put into effect whereby any Jew who is
interested in the rebuilding of this Jewish Home-land may be registered as a
citizen thereof. In Jerusalem is kept a 'Book of Remembrance,' in which
is written the name and address of every Jew- who contributes S1Q0 or more
to the Jewish National Fund. All whose names appear in this book are auto¬
matically made citizens of the Jewish Homeland."

The foregoing is from "Zionism in Prophecy," 1936, Dawn Publishers,
Brooklyn, N. Y.

1940 ADDENDA

"Dependable sources report that Zionist International headquarters are in
process of removing from London to Washington. The B’nai B’ritb Anti-
Defamation League, with its set-up perfected in practically every city of the
U. S., will work in closest harmony with the transplanted group. It is under¬
stood that the League s cash' fund of more than $30,000,000 at the first of
January, is substantially larger at the present time. With more than 14,000
individual case records perfectly cross-indexed and co-ordinated, those who
direct the League are in possession of tremendous pow'er. There is wide ex¬
pectation that this power will be felt in connection of the 1940 Presidential
election."—From the Daily News of Amarillo, Texas, Aug. 31, 1940.

MOVIES A JEW MONOPOLY
(Edmondson Bulletin of Oct. 14, 1938)

By thinking, earnest and fair-minded American patriots, deeply concerned Over the
jazzy-communistic eyt-and-ear "education” American Youth is receiving via the "movies,”
wc are repeatedly asked this vital question:

"IS the motion-picture industry really Jewish-controlled?

The straightest answer to that query is: "Let’s look at the record! ’ We believe quota¬
tions from it, as below, will support the estimate that over 95% of the business is Jewish-
owned and operated. Jews themselves supply figures which confirm it—so let us examine
;tn analysis of the industry published in the Sept. 22, 1958, issue of The Chicago Jewish
Sentinel, ns follows:

The film industry is one that employs thousands of Jews, shows no discrimination
against Jewish labor, and ABSORBS ITS SHARE — AND MORE — OF JEWISH
REFUGEES.”

1 2 0

The publication then proceeds to list as jew stars in the film-world: Paul Muni,
Eddie Cantor, Edward G. Robinson, Luise Rainer, Edward Arnold, Joseph Schildkraut,
Joseph Brombert, Tony Martin (Weiss), jack Benny, Ben Blue, Jules Garfieid, Ethel
Merman, Eleanor "Whitney.

Among the producers, writers and others are mentioned Max Reinhardt, Sol Lesser,
Sam Briskm, Louis B. Mayer. George Bilson, Hunt Stromberg, Jerry Hoffman, Sidney
Lanfield, Ben Bernie, Maurice Conn, Ben Kahane, Lew Seiler, Sam G. Engel, Lee Schul-
man, David O. Selzmck, Clifford Odets, Paul Yawitz, Vincent Sherman, Lee Katz,
Walter Winchell, Paltiei Buchner, Hunt Brand.

OFFICIAL FINANCIAL RECORDS

Now, let us examine the statistical publications, especially Moody's Manual, for
1938. In this we find the officers and directors of the important corporations in the
motion picture business ,as listed below;

LOEWS. INC.; David Bernstein, j. R. Rubin, N. M. Schenck, Isador Frey, Leopold
Friedman, C. C. Moscowitz, Arthur W. Loew, A. L. Licbtmann, E. J. Mannix, Sam Katz,
E. A. Schuler, Leo Cohen, N. Nayfack, R. Lazarus, B. Thau. WARNER BROS. PIC¬
TURES: H, M. Warner, Albert Warner, J, L. Warner, E. K. Hessberg, C. S. Guggen-
heimer, Herman Starr, Morris Wolf, S. P. Friedman, S. E. Morris, Joseph Bernhard.
UNITED ARTISTS THEATER CIRCUIT: J. M. Schenck, Lee Schubert, B, S. Nayfack,
A. H. Frisch, J. H. Moscowitz. PARAMOUNT PICTURES; Adolf Zukor, Y. F. Free¬
man, Fred Mohrhardt. j. H. Karp, Fred Myers, j. D. Hertz. RADIO-KEITK-ORPHEUM:
Lee Spitz, David Samoff, Morris Goodman, Fredk. Straus. METROPOLITAN PLAY¬
HOUSES: J. M. Schenck, L. B. Soper, Lee Spitz, M. C. Weizman, M. A. Albert. COL¬
UMBIA PICTURES: Harrv Cohn, Jack Cohn, L. M. Blancke, Sol. Bornstein, jack Koer-
ner, Charles Schwartz. CONSOLIDATED FILM INDUSTRIES: J. Waller, j. W.
Altschuler, M. J. Siegel, R. I. Poucher, E. H. Seifert, N. K. Loder.

Following is a "Hollywood Record" printed in the "Liberation Magazine" of Aug.
14 , 1938, giving "principal Jews in the business":

Jack Benny (real name Kubelsky), Bert Lahr (Larrheim), Charlie Chaplin (Ron-
steinj, George Burns (Birnbaum), jack Bernie (Ancelowitsch), Fanny Brice (Borach),
Elaine Barrie (Jacobs), Bobby Breen (Borsack), Eddie Cantor (Iskowitz), Ina Claire
(Fagan), Ricardo Cortez (Kranz), Patricia Ellis (Lefcwich), Douglas Fairbanks (UU*
man), Paulette Goddard (Levy), Al Jolson (Yoelsen), Sybil Jason (Jacobs), Geo.
Jessel, Sam Jaffee, Ted Lewis (Friedman), Myer Livingston (Marx), Paul Muni (Weis-
enfreund), Ethel Merman (Zimmerman), Parkyakarkas (Eistein), Marion Marsh, Four
Marx Brothers, Three Ritz Brothers, Joe Penner (Pintriern), Irving Pichel, Edward G.
Robinson (Goidenberg), Gregory Ratoff, Harry Richman, Francis Lederer, Jack Berle,
Florence Reed, Sylvia Sidney (Jason), Maurice Schwartz, David Warfield, Carmel Myers,
Jackie Coogan (Cohn), Igor Gorin, Sophie Tucker, Jos. Schildkraut. Norm'a Talmage
(Mrs. Geo. Jessel), Lionel Stander, Ed Wynn (Leopold), Walter Winchell, Luise
Rainer, Milton Berle, Irving Berlin (Ballne), Sally Eileis. J. Edward Brombert.

Ail the foregoing lists are very incomplete, Space prevents full coverage.

CLERGYMAN REPORTS JEW MONOPOLY

The very important points below are taken from "The Movie Barons and Sunday
Movies.” by Rev. R. H. Martin, President of the National Reform Assn.:

"The motion picture industry is said to be the fifth largest industry in the U. S.,
with a capital of over two billion dollars. There are three divisions—producers, distribut¬
ors, exhibitors. Most of the producing companies are members of "The Motion Picture
Producers and Distributors of America, Inc." There are 25 or more companies in this
organization, which produces from 90 to 95 per cent of all the pictures in this country.
A half dozen of the largest of these control the organization, and it in turn dominates
practically the entire motion picture business. Probably no great industry in America is
so completely dominated by a few men of wealth as the motion picture industry.

"Investigation shows that the movie barons during the depression period were re¬
ceiving immense salaries and bonuses while their companies were heading toward re¬
ceivership and bankruptcy, or sustaining immense losses. Paramount-Publix is one of the
largest production companies. In 1933, when Paramount was in bankruptcy, Gerard
SWOPE, President received $72,308. In 1929 President Adolf ZUKOR received $130,000
in salary and $757,500 bonus. Film executive salaries "revealed to the U. S. Senate"
(1933 ) are listed: David Loew $521,000, Irving Thalberg $1>5,200, Arthur Loew
$311,000, Emanuel Cohen $173,000. Harry Cohen $145,600, Carl Liemmle $156,000,
Louis B. Mayer $84,500. Reports read at the meeting at Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Dec. 11,

1 2 I

1934, showed Nicholas M. Schenck received $219,000 in salary and bonus, David Bern¬
stein $149,700, Vice-Prest. Jesse L. Lasky received in 1929 in salary and bonus $881,500
from Paramount.

''The Fox Film Corp. was one of the largest production companies which also went
extensively into the exhibitor field, It went into bankruptcy in 1930 and came out in

1935, and is now the Twentieth Century-Fox Co. Sidney R. Kent is now President of
Fox and under a seven year contract is guaranteed a minimum salary of $180,000 with
a possible maximum of almost $300,000 per year, plus $200.00 per week for entertain¬
ment. Under, the same seven year contract, Joseph M. Schenck, Chairman of the Board,
is to receive $130,000 per year.

"The figures on salaries and bonuses are taken from the report to the U. S. Senate
by the Federal Trade Commission.

"The same group of men, who have taken millions of dollars out of the American
Public through their manipulations of the motion picture business, are still in control.
THE BIG MAJORITY OF THE BARONS WHO CONTROL THIS INDUSTRY,
ARE JEWS. From reliable sources we have learned that above 90% of the big barons of
the industry are Jews—in fact, they themselves claim 95%, and boast of it."

BENJ. FRANKLIN WAS ANTI-JEWISH
(Nov. 15, 1938, Edmondson Publication)

During the past few years, there has been no single piece of publicity
which has "got the Jewish goat" more than the alleged anti-Jewish "prophecy"
of Benjamin Franklin, America's great statesman, reported as having been
made at the 1789 U. S. Constitutional Convention.

This "prophecy 1 was first published in the U. S. by 'Liberation” Magazine
of Feb. 3, 1934. It went to Europe and was widely circulated by militant patri¬
ots. Reference was made to such circulation by the N. Y. Jewish Daily Bulletin
of Sept. 20, 1934. The undersigned received many inquiries as to the content of
said prophecy. He investigated and found that the late Madison Grant, author
of "The Conquest of a Continent" (boycotted by Jews), had in his possession
a report that Charles Pinckney's diary of the U. S. Constitutional Convention of
1789 contained Franklin’s words as quoted herein; but up to that time Grant
had not been able to find the record, for which a search was still going on.
Thereupon, the undersigned, on Sept. 25, 1934, to meet a general demand for
information, published the document AS CIRCULATING NEWS.

"Franklin's Prophecy” has interjected itself into the newspapers frequently
since then, always being referred to as a forgery, without any explanation as to
what had been forged. A forgery, in dictionary definition, is a counterfeit of
something. The same forgery-criticism may be extended to another "prophecy"
—The "Protocols of The Elders of Zion,” denounced by Jews as a forgery—of
what? And the resemblance goes further, for the predictions of both are being
tarried into effect today by Roosevelt Jews in the U. S. The comment upon
this is that the add test of the genuineness of prophecy lies in the fulfillment.

Jewish publications asserr that Franklin was a friend of the Jews because he
once made a $25.00 "contribution,” together with other Gentile churchfolk,
for the building of a synagogue; BUT FRANKLIN WAS DEFINITELY
ANTI-JEWISH according to his own writings. In the N. Y. Public Library
will be found books containing "Benjamin Franklin’s Writings" by Smythe.
Vol. 8, quotes a letter from Franklin to President John Adams, dared Passy,
France, Nov. 26, 1781, prior to the Constitutional Convention, as below:

"I think that keeping us out of the possession of fifty thousands pounds
sterling worth of goods for securing the payment of a demand for damages is

12 2

not ony dishonorable treatment but a monstrous injustice. It seems to me that
it is principally with John Neufviile of Amsterdam, Holland, we have to do ; and
although I believe him to be as much a Jew as any in Jerusalem, 1 did not
expect that, with so many and such constant professions of friendship for the
U. S. with which he loads all his letters, he would attempt to enforce his de¬
mands by a proceeding so abominable. His proposition of terms on which he
would borrow money for us stamped his character on my mind with an impres¬
sion to deep that it is not yet effaced.”

In the same volume there is another letter to President Adams dated, Passy,
France, Dec. 14, 1781, from which this is extracted:

"I was led to understand that it would be agreeable to these gentlemen (1.
Neufviile & Son), if, in acknowledgement of their zeal for our cause, and great
services in securing this loan, they could be made by some law of Congress the
general consignee of America to receive and sell upon commission in the dif¬
ferent ports of the nations, all the produce of America that should be sent by
our merchants to Europe. I remark upon the extravagance and impossibility of
this proposition. By this time, I fancy your Excellency is satisfied in supposing
J. de Neufviile was as much a Jew as 2 ny in Jerusalem—since Jacob was not
content with his percents but took the whole of his brother’s, Esau’s, birthright
AND HIS POSTERITY DID THE SAME BY THE CANAANITES AND
CUT THEIR THROATS-IN THE BARGAIN—which I do not think Neuf¬
viile has the least inclination to do by us while he can GET anything by our
being alive.”

Smythe’s Writings are pronounced genuine in the following report: Editor
Wesley Winans Stout of the Saturday Evening Post wrote May 16, 1939, to
Dr. J. E. Conner, 1121 Bedford Ave., Brooklyn, N. Y., that: 'Carl Van Doren
is the greatest living authority on Benj. Franklin. I quote him: It is true that
Franklin had difficulties with Jean de Neufviile & Son, a firm of Dutch bank¬
ers who made a tentative loan to Congress, negotiated by William Lee, and
demanded an extravagant security.' ”

Below is more evidence from the record. Read the following Pennsylvania
Constitution's anti-Jew oath required of citizens at the time the great philos¬
opher was alive, and ask yourself if any Jew could honestly sign it:

PENNSYLVANIA'S ANTI-JEW OATH

"I-, do profess faith in God The Father and in Jesus

Chtist His Eternal Son, the True God, and in the Holy Spirit one God blessed
evermore, and do acknowledge the sacred Scriptures of the Old and New
Testament to be given by Divine Inspiration.”

The following is from "The Republic Reclaimed” by Chicago Lawyer
Newton Jenkins:

"It is very significant that the Chairman of the Pennsylvania Constitutional
Convention (1776) which wrote into the Constitution this provision against the
Jews was none other than Benjamin Franklin. The great predominance of
Quakers in Pennsylvania brought the matter to a head when, in 1790, four
months after Franklin's death, the test clause, at it was called, was eliminated
from the Constitution of Pennsylvania."'

It is noteworthy that persons with Jewish names have been in charge of
Franklin records. William GL T GGENHEIM has been head of the Benjamin

1 2 3

Franklin Society. Max FERRAND is understood to have supervised Franklin
records for the Huntington Library at Pasadena, Calif. A collector of Franklin
records called "Stone”, is said to spell the name "Stein." He announced some
months ago in the newspapers that he was disposing of same to the Franklin
Instituce at Philadelphia.

Poultney Bigelow, of Malden-on-Hudson, who has world-wide fame as a
man of letters and American author and journalist, writes the undersigned:
"Voltaire, FRANKLIN and Frederick The Great, were the three outstanding
champions of political and religious liberty in the most humanitarian period of
the world. All three were friends, AND ALL THOUGHT ALIKE IN THE
MATTER OF THE JEWS. All three advocated tolerance, the right of residence
and police protection for Jews in their traditional pursuit of pawnbroking and
money-lending. But not one ever dreamed of them claiming citizenship, much
less an office WHERE THEY MIGHT RULE OVER WHITE MEN."

(Upon asking permission to quote him, Mr. Bigelow', with high patriotism,
replied: "Anything from this pen which you think useful to our common
country and the cause of historic truth, is at your service. The Jew is a fact of
historic importance. We examine such facts with an open mind,” He wrote
from Paris 2-7-37: "Paris is now almost as Yiddish as Manhattan or London.
It is an International Plague that calls for SURGICAL TREATMENT.")

Let us analyze, point by point, the alleged Franklin Prophecy, placing
Prophecy in one column and Fulfillment opposite thereto, in a parallel com¬
parison, as below. Then digest the deadly significance.

"FRANKLIN PROPHECY"

(l) In whatever country Jews have settled
in any great number, they have lowered its
moral tone and depreciated its economic
integrity;

(2) Segregated themselves, and have not
assimilated;

(3) Have tried to undermine the Christ¬
ian Religion;

FULFILLMENTS

(1) "From reliable sources we have
learned that above 90 of the big barons
of the Movie Induscry are Jews. The cur¬
rent run of motion pictures has been injur¬
ious to public morals."—From "The Movie
Baron and Sunday Movies" by Rev. R, H.
Martin, President National Reform Assn.
The author of '’The Republic Reclaimed”
says: "Jews control the slate-makers in all
factions and in all parties. We find evi¬
dence of debasing Jewish Influence on every
hand in the U. S. today.”

(2) Ludwig Lewisohn, prominent Jewish
author of "Israel,” says: "A Jew remains a
Jew. Assimilation is impossible.” Prof.
Albert Einstein was quoted in Collier's
Weekly (11-26-38) as declaring: "A Jew
who abandons his faith remains a Jew.”
N. Y. Supreme Court Justice Samuel I.
Rosenman has spoken publicly against it.
(N. Y. Times 2-1-36).

(3) Maurice Samuel, Zionist Author, in
"You Gentiles," exclaims: "We Jews are
destroyers—and will remain destroyers for¬
ever. Nothing you can do will meet our de¬
mands. The unassimilated Jew is dangerous
to you. Ours is one life — yours another.
They are opposed in mortal enmity.” Jew¬
ish Author Bernard Lazare in "Anti-Semit¬
ism," says: "The Jew works at his age-old
task—the annihilation of the religion of
Christ.’ 1 The London Jewish World of Max.
15, 1923, stated: "Fundamentally, Judaism
is anti-Christian."

124

(4) Have built up a State within a state:

(5) Wlien opposed, have tried to strangle
that country to death financially;

(6) Did the world give Palestine.to the
jews, they would find some cogent reason
for not returning:

(■?) They are vampires; they cannot live
among themselves only; they must subsist
on people not of their race;

(8) They will dominate the land;

(9) They will change our form of
government;

(10) If we do not exclude them then, in
200 years our children will be working in
the fields, and Jews will be in the count¬
ing houses, rubbing their hands.

(4) "Let us recognize tfiat we Jews are
a distinct nationality." U. S. Supreme Court
Former Justice L. D. Brandeis. in "The
Jewish Problem and How to Solve it." "I
cannot for a moment concede that, at the
same time one can be a true American and
an honest adherent of the Zionist (polit¬
ical) movement." Jacob Schiff, in letter
Aug. 8, 1907.

(>) Promoters of the International
Jewish Boycott against Hitler-Gennar.y for
expelling Jewish Communists, boast that
they have pushed chat country to the verge
of financial bankruptcy. The boycott has
been extended to Italy and Japan.

(6) In his book "From Pharaoh to
Hitler’’ Jewish Lawyer-Bernard j. Brow r n
says: "The most ardent Jewish Nationalists

(Political Zionists) do not intend to live
in Palestine even if a Homeland were
established there." The Dead Sen mineral
wealth, estimated at many billions of
dollars, has attracted Jew capital to
Palestine.

(7) The anti-Communist Canadian pam¬
phlet "Key to the Mystery" quotes the
following Jewish boast published in the
Belingske Tidende of Dec. 9. 193 ^; "Who
does not know what the glands in the
human body represent'’ The Jews have
settled upon the glands of the nations.
These glands are the exchanges, banks,
daily papers, insurance companies."

(8) Roosevelt’s Key Jews control Wash¬
ington, the Political Power Center of the
Nation, and N. Y. City, its Economic Dy¬
namo. See Roosevelt’s Supreme Jewish
Council, including "Economic-Master Mind"
Bernard M. Baruch; "Legal Master-Mind"
Felix Frankfurter; "New Deal Father" For¬
mer Supreme Court Justice L. D. Brandeis;
and U. S. Treasury Dictator Morgenthau.

(9) "We challenge the American System;
we demand a thoroughly Socialized Demo¬
cracy; we support an enlarged Supreme
Court.”—Central Conference of American
Rabbis’ proclamations published in the
jewish-owned N. Y. Times. Sept. 13, 193<S.
The U. S.A. is A Republic. Webster's
Dictionary calls "Social Democracy" Com¬
munism.

(10) Are U. S. Jews in the "counting
houses rubbing their hands" over their
Kentucky Gold Pile, concentrated in Ameri¬
ca and wrecking European credit.

ADDENDA

DESCENDANT OF PRESIDENT JOHN ADAMS WARNS OF JEWISH MENACE

The following extracts are taken from "Henry Adams and his Friends," 1947, by
Harold Dean Cater, published by Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston. Mass.—Henry Adams
is a descendant of John Adams, signer of the American Declaration of Independence,
and President of The Republic, elected in 1796:

"... The Jew Question-is really the most serious of our problems. . . . The Kaffir
Circus is the most startling phenomenon since the South Sea Scheme. It is almost wholly
in Tew hands. Beit is building a palace in Park Lane. Barnato has rented Spencer House.

1 2 5

Harris) (Page 350 ) names tailed after J. P. Morgan in the

$4 - *» J~j** ^^jrviTK

save Morgans bankrupt stocks t.otn gig -pc ‘ | 10 | e car case is rotten with worms—

■■■■•' tLemr *° john Hay ftom Paris '

JUly 'ThrSp 6 aL ( h P p £ a e „ S am- How ,0 ^"^rfhunXd SJ hence! * 7 whole

. ^777^— i»Bu^ S

M a‘ ri

for rae -" (Letter 10

JOhn ^^^T^. poem in Benjamin Frankhn's papers as printed in

■Works of Franklin" by John Bigelow. Fr-edom gave

on Genera. Benedict Arnold: ’

Whose god is Gold and whose saviour is a Bribe.
' • '- r - -- ^

(On Page B < of;^»
from Benjamin Franklin to Lafayette tr ?; ■• Enc j ose d i s copy of letter from his

7^77^7 one of onr cruisers . . . Jndns sold oniv one

man, Arnold three million. )

EINSTEIN CONFESSES

The following is from Edmondson Bulletin of Nov. 28. ISbS: .

jas. sts »

as making the following admission, , .

EVERYWHERE CONSIDERABLE. The Jew who abandons his faith

REMAINS A JEW." .

Observe the implications of that Jewish confession:

(1) This pre-eminent leader and representative Jew evidently spring
for Jewry not only admits in the foregoing that the Jew himself creates^ the
very persecution about which he constantly wails, but by confessing J -
actually THRIVE on it, Gentiles are forced to accept the premise that Jewish
Leadership CAUSES "POGROMS” so that the tribe may materialistically profit

(2) He admits that Jewish power is very important and effective m

Gentile world affairs.

( 3 ) He admits that the word "jew" stands for many more things than

reUg, (4) He admits that Jews remain Jews after they abandon the so-ealied

^^'ToleaTn the KIND of antagonism the Jews create in the non-Jews in order
that they may profit, digest the statement of Louis S. Posner, Manhattan C

12 6

man of the N. Y. campaign of the American ORT Federation to get funds for
training European Jews, The N. Y. Times of Nov. 23, 1938, quotes him as
saying:

"The anti-Semitic trouble in Europe is NOT the result of the RELIGIOUS
views of the Jews, and is NOT THE result of the cultural or RACIAL dif¬
ferences between Jew and Christian. It is due MAINLY to ECONOMIC
conditions.”

I have unwaveringly held that the Jewish Problem in America is ECON¬
OMIC and political, not religious or racial.

This Einstein confession completely vindicates a bulletin published by the
undersigned on August 1st, 1935, headed, "Thriving on Persecution.”

"Persecution cannot crush the Jew. He is the aristocrat of the world.”—
Samuel Uncermyer, quoted in the London Investigator of June, 1935.

"DEMOCRACY”

Not in U. S. Constitution

(From an Edmondson address before the Anti-Communist Society of Allentown,
Penna., Dec. 9, 1938.)

FELLOW PATRIOTS:

You have seen the Communist slogan: "Communism is Twentieth Cen¬
tury Americanism!”

You have heard Communist Leader Browder bellow for ''democracy” and
cali on his followers to vote for the Roosevelt New Dealers, who spout
"democracy” while they play for socialism.

"We are not only the largest and most powerful DEMOCRACY in the
whole world, but many other democracies look to us for leadership—that
WORLD DEMOCRACY may survive,” vociferated President Roosevelt in his
speech quoted in the N. Y. Times of Dec. 6, 1938.

But you know that the United States of America was established as A
Representative Republic—not a Democracy;

That, by Section 4, Article 4 of the Constitution, each state in the Union is
guaranteed "A Republician Form of Government;"—By The Republic of the
United States.

That the checks and balances provided by the founding fathers were
designed to safeguard against democratic tyranny as well as autocratic dictator¬
ship.

But do you also know that in neither the Constitution as amended, nor in
the Declaration of Independence, does the word "DEMOCRACY” anywhere
appear?

Let us dig deeper into this democracy business. Rabbis demand for
America "A Thoroughly Socialized Democracy.” If you will read the N. Y.
Times of Sept. 13, 1936, you will see an item therein quoting a resolution by
the great Central Conference of American Rabbis, largest Sanhedrin in the
World. That resolution calls for the scrapping of the American System. (See
Foot Notes 1 and 2).

What is a "socialized democracy?” Russia answers! The Soviets are
ostensibly Communist, but the official title of the Government is "Union of
Soviet SOCIALIST Republics.” Jews established it!

On July 4, 1937, the Editor of The N. Y. Morning Freheit (largest
Communist daily in the U. S.), M. J. Olgin, Russian-born Jew, published the
following:

127

"Communism is Twentieth Century Americanism. Communism is the theory
and practice of putting into the terms of the present social forces the doctrine
of the Declaration of Independence."

Communism is the violence-tool by which its advocates hope to establish
Socialism, the end produce. What is this socialism? A political rule where indi¬
viduals are regimented into machines, a condition of human slave-existence
where the good of the state is always above that of the individual, who is
leveled down to the lowest intelligence m the mass.

We Americans want no Democracy-Communism-Socialism. Individualistic
Americanism is the most deadly foe Communism-Socialism has, It levels up,
not down. Individual creative genius is the Soul of Progress. Communism-
Socialism are the REAL REACTIONARIES. For Individualism, the preservation
of Americanism is worth any sacrifice, in my opinion.

What a fight we are in! It will take all we've got to win, because we come
into conflict with citizens who seem to like to advertize their ignorance, But
Americans have shown themselves to be unbeatable, and I have no doubt as to
the result,—ONCE THEY KNOW!

Often we fighters wonder why we keep on sacrificing personal resources,
comforts and health, with SO much judaized selfishness, cowardice and apathy
around us; but there is something inside that tells us to go on; and we try to
emulate the stout old Scotch warrior, who cried: "I’ll lay me down and bleed a
while, and then get up and fight again!"

NOTE NO. 1:—"Social Democracy" is defined thus in Webster’s Diction¬
ary; "The SOCIALIST PARTY founded in- Germany in 1863 by Ferdinand
LaSalle (JEW), in 187? united with the followers of Karl Marx (JEW),
aiming to secure adoption of state SOCIALISM (As in Russia). See Funk &
Fagnalls Dictionary definition of Russia’s Jewish Bolshevik Party, viz: "The
TERRORISTIC Branch of the SOCIAL DEMOCRATIC PARTY;’’ and then
refer to Webster’s Dictionary description of "Bolshevik.’ thus: Radical Wing
of the SOCIAL DEMOCRATIC PARTY in Russia, NOW CALLED THE
COMMUNIST PARTY. 1

NOTE NO. 2—ConsCtution-Framer James Madison, who, in "The
Federalist,” is held to have "sold" The Constitution to the American People,
denounced "democracies” in these words: "Pure democracies have ever been the
scenes of turbulence and contention; have ever been found incompatible with
PERSONAL SECURITY or rights of property."

FAMOUS BRITISH AUTHOR SAYS JEWS ARE "AT THE BOTTOM”

OF ALL GENTILE TROUBLES

From Edmondson Bulletin of January 4, 1939.

Nesta H. Webster, of Great Britain, famous author of "World Revolu¬
tion,” "Secret Societies & Subversive Movements,” "Surrender of an Em¬
pire"’ and other exceptionally documented books, has just written "Germany &
England,” a penetrating analysis of the present political situation saying:

"Hitler took the control of Germany out of the hands of the Jews. We
are faced with a ruler who, although a dictator, REPRESENTS THE WILL OF
NINETY-PER CENT OF THE POPULATION, a plain man of the people,
coo socialistic for us.

"The essence of Fascism and Nazism is NATIONALISM, while that of
Bolshevism is INTERNATIONALISM.

12 8

"After Russia had been brought low and a hideous revenge taken on her
by the PREDOMINANTLY JEWISH BOLSHEVIKS, the Jews started bol-
shevizing Germany, and having got her almost completely under control they
Remained pro-German until the rise of Hitler. It was then that the whole
Jewish power turned against Germany. The Jews had not minded a certain
amount, of persecution as long as they were given power in the state. This is
precisely what Hitler took from them, hence largely the cry of persecution. A
Jew, Ernest Lissauer, who coined the phrase 'Gott Strafe England,’ composed
the 'Hymn of Hate.'

"Since the main cause de guerre against Hitler is his treatment of the
Jews, it is most urgent for people in this country to know the truth about it.
BUT THAT IS JUST THE DIFFICULTY. The British public derives its
information from the newspapers or the radio, WHICH ARE LARGELY
CONTROLLED BY JEWS, AND IN TURN RECEIVE THEIR INFOR¬
MATION FROM JEWISH SOURCES.

"England of 1938 is not the England of 1914 because she is no longer
controlled by Britons. WE ARE UNDER AN INVISIBLE JEWISH DIC¬
TATORSHIP—a dictatorship that can be felt in every sphere of life."

From the foregoing, it is evident that the famous European author has
had further confirmation supplementing the following extract from a letter
written by her on May 4, 1934, to Arthur Goadby, a New York friend of the
undersigned:

“Personally, I am more than ever inclined to believe that The Protocols
of the Learned Elders of Zion are genuine. Without them I do not see how
one could explain things that are happening today. More than ever, I THINK
THE JEWS ARE AT THE BOTTOM OF ALL OUR TROUBLES."

"FEAR OF THE JEWS"

Puts Frankfurter on U. S. Supreme Court
(From Edmondson Bulletin of January 12, 1939)

At the Senate Judiciary Sub-Committee hearing in Washington on Presi¬
dent Roosevelt’s appointment of Harvard’s Zionist Professor to the U. S.
Supreme Court, Senator P. F. McCarran of Nevada asked if Frankfurter
believed in the doctrine of Marxism—according to the N. Y. World-Telegram
of Jan. 12, 1939:

"Mr. Frankfurter snapped: 'I do not believe you are any more attached to
the THEORY OF Americanism than I am. I do not believe that you have ever
taken the oath to support the Constitution of the U. S. with less reservation
than I have or would now.”

Do Senators take oath with ANY reservation?

"Who’s Who in American Jewry” says Frankfurter was "Associated with
the Brandeis-Mack Leadership of the Zionist Organization of America, and
was Legal Advisor of the Zionist Delegation at the Versailles Peace Conference
at Paris in 1919.”

"Speaking as an American, I cannot for a moment concede that one can be
AT THE SAME TIME A TRUE AMERICAN AND AN HONEST AD¬
HERENT OF THE ZIONIST MOVEMENT. They who believe in and hope
and labor for an ultimate restoration of Jewish POLITICAL life, and the re¬
establishment of a Jewish NATION, place a PRIOR LIEN upon their citizen¬
ship which * * * WOULD PREVENT THEM FROM MAINTANING
ALLEGIANCE TO THE COUNTRY OF WHICH THEY NOW CLAIM TO
BE GOOD CITIZENS."—Jacob Schiff, N. Y. Sun of Sept. 4, 1907.

12 9

How can Zionist Frankfurter reconcile that doctrine with his ’'allegiance to
the Constitution"—or does he rely upon the advance absolution provided by the
"reverse 1 ’ Jewish Kol Nidre "prayer,” reading: "All oaths * * * with w'hich
we may bind ourselves from this Day of Atonement until the next Day of
Atonement * * * we repent them all. May they be made null and void."

Under the circumstances, is Zionist Frankfurter, who owes a foreign al¬
legiance, FIT to sit in judgement on citizens of the U. S.?

The World-Telegram report continues:

"'Nor do I believe you are more attached to the theories and principles
of Americanism than I am,’ {Frankfurter added).

What IS Americanism? Let the American Veterans organizations answer
—"Americanism is an unfailing love of country; loyalty to its institutions ana
ideals; eagerness to defend it against all enemies (that means Communists) ;
undivided allegiance to the flag."

Signed by all the American war veteran organizations and promulgated in
February, 1927, the Americanism definition quoted was not signed by the
"Jewish War Veterans of the U. S." Why?

Some light on the subject may be had by reading the following from
"Der Jude” (of Germany) (1916) by Zionist Leader Klatzkin: "Only the
[Jewish Code rules our life. We form in ourselves a closed business and
juridical corporation. A strong w'all separates us from the peoples in the lands
in which we live—and behind that wall is A JEWISH STATE.’

Mr. Frankfurter said he never attended meetings of the American Civil
Liberties Union, and was not among its executives.

He is a National Committeeman—and the N. Y. American of Nov. 7,
1935, said :"Frankfurter is AN ACTIVE MEMBER of the Communistic
ACLU.”

Former President Theodore Roosevelt wrote Frankfurter Dec. 19, 1917,
on the Mooney Case: "You are taking an attitude which seems to me to be
fundamentally that of Trotsky and other Bolsheviki leaders—an attitude which
may be fraught with mischief to this country. * * * I have received your report
on the Bisbee deportation. * * * Your report is as thoroughly a misleading
document as could be written on the subject. * * Here again, you are engaged in
excusing men precisely like the Bolsheviki, who are murderers and encouragers
of murder; who are traitors to their allies, to democracy and to civilization, as
well as to the U. S.; and whose acts are nevertheless apologized for on grounds
substantially like those which you allege."

NEW DEAL LEGAL MASTER-MIND

The Simon-Schuster 1934 book, "The New Dealers," says: "More than any
other one person, Frankfurter is the legal master-mind of the New Deal.
Frankfurter men are established in key posts throughout the Roosevelt Ad¬
ministration. FRANKFURTER ADVISED THE ADMINISTRATION ON
ITS MAIN STRATEGY WITH REGARD TO THE SUPREME COURT."
"Packing!"

The World-Telegram report continued as follows:

" ‘Did you know that William Z. Foster (notorious Communist) was a
member of the National Committee of the ACLU?’

" T knew that he was on it at one time.’ (Frankfurter reply).

"Senator McCarren said: 'I SHOULD THINK THAT A MAN IN
YOUR HIGH PLACE WOULD INVESTIGATE HIS ASSOCIATES.’

"Frankfurter’s face reddened. 'I base my association with the Union on
the record of its actions.’

i

f'

J

Y

£

V

X

i

)

i

1 30

Another diversive retort? This is what Congressional Report of the House,
No. 2290. Jan. 17, 1931, describes as ACTIONS: "The American Civil
Liberties Union is closely affiliated with the Communist movement'in the
U. S., and fully 909c of its efforts are on behalf of Communists who have
come in conflict with the law. It is quite apparent that the mam function of
the ACLU is to attempt to protect Communists in then advocacy of force and
violence to overthrow the U. S. Govt."

Report 2290 also quotes the Chairman of the Communism investigating
Committee as asking Director Roger N. Baldwin of the American Civil Liberties
Union if his ORGANIZATION upheld the right of a arizen or an alic-n to
advocate the overthrow of the U. S. Government bv force and violence. "THAT
IS THE ORGANIZATION’S POSITION;' answered Baldwin.

"HE DOTH PROTEST TOO MUCH"

FRANKLY. 1 DON’T BELIEVE WHAT FRANKFURTER SAYS
ABOUT HIMSELF AND HIS VIEWS. That is my right, just as I am within
legal bounds when I declare that I hold an honest belief in the truth of the
matter herein presented, regarding an aspirant for public office, and submit
fair patriotic comment thereon without malice.

Many protests were made to the Senate Judiciary Sub-Conunitlee, which
ignored them as of no value when it unanimously endorsed Frankfurter
WHY?

1940. ADDENDA

"DUE PROCESS CLAUSES OUGHT TO GO!'

Declaring that the due process clauses of the 14th Amendment to the
U. S. Constitution protect Jews from pogroms in America, Senator losiah W.
Bailey of North Carolina, addressing the Senate March 17, 1938, on the
Reorganization Bill, made the following statement:

' I was talking with a gentleman of the Jewish race, a Member of the
Congress, in the lobby of a hotel the other evening. He said that he never had
any respect for the due-process clause in the Constitution,

"I was very much amazed, as he is an intelligent man.

"I said: 'How long have you been in America?’

"He said: 'I was bom here.’

"I said: 'And you have no respect for the clause requiring that no man's
life, liberty, or property shall be taken from him, either by the Federal
Government or by a State, except by due process of law?'

"He said: 'It is just a means of beating the.devil around rbe stump.’ "

"No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges
or immunities of citizens of the U. S.; nor shall any'state deprive anv person of
life, liberty or property, without due process of law-; nor deny to any person
within its jurisdiction die equal protection of laws,"—I4th Amendment to the
U. S. Constitution.

In the "Law and Politics of Prof. Felix Frankfurter,” 1938, edited and
sponsored by Archibald MacLeish, Librarian of Congress, appears the following
from Frankfurter:

"We have had 50 years of experiment with the 14th Amendment, and the
centralizing authority lodged with the Supreme Court over the domestic affairs
of 48 widely different states is an authority which it simply cannot discharge
with safety either to itself or the states. THE DUE PROCESS CLAUSES
OUGHT TO GO!"

1 3 1

Since Frankfurter says also "The U. S. Supreme Court IS the Constitution
(N. Y. Times 4-17-30), the logical conclusion .is that this Jewish Justice is
"working over" the rest of that high tribunal in order to alter the Constitution,
eliminate the due process clauses, and deprive Gentiles of life, liberty and

property/

WHO RULES RUSSIA?

(Edmondson Bulletin, revised, Chronologically, to 1939.)

"Beria, newest addition to the Council of People’s Commissars of Russia, like
many ocher recent proteges of the Kaganowitsch family, is Jewish. THE INCREASING
JEWISH CHARACTER'”OF THE BOLSHEVIK REGIME is said to explain its growing
anti-German measures.''—Chicago Tribune, January 5, 1939, by its Correspondent Donald
Day at Riga. Latvia, with whom Edmondson had personal correspondence.

This is the latest up-to-date confirmation of the continuance of the Jewish Domina-
ation of Russia, beginning with the Jewish Kerensky start of the revolution' that es¬
tablished the L T nion of Socialist Soviet Republics, directed by a Committee of 545 of
whom 447 were jews. The following chronological order is illuminating.

1918 Sept. 18: Netherlands Representative Oudendyke at St. Petersburg reported (as
reproduced by British White Paper of April, 1910): "Unless Bolshevism is/ntpped in
the bud immediately it is bound to spread, in one form or another, ail over the world,
as it is organized BY JEWS, whose one object is to destroy, for their own ends, the

existing order of things."

1918 December "Jews in Russia" by Victor Marsden, Russian Correspondent of the
London Post says in the Personnel of the First Soviet Bureaucracy were 17 Jews of 22
members- War Commissariat, 34 Jews out of 43; Commissariat of the Interior, 45. Jews
out of <54; Committee on Foreign Affairs, 13 Jews out of 17; Commissariat of the Ex¬
chequer, 26 jews out of 30; Commissariat of Justice, 18 Jews out of 19; Commission ot
Hvgiene, 4 Jews out of 5; Commissariat of Public Instruction, 4 4 Jews out of 53, Com¬
mission of Social Aid, 6 Jews out of 6; Commission of Works. 7 jews out of 8 ; Com¬
mission of Reconstruction of Jaroslav, 2 Jews out of 2, Delegates Bolshevist Red Cross,
8 Jews out of 8; Provincial Commissars, 21 Jews out of 23; Journalists, 41-Jews out of
42 - Commission of Inquiry on Late Officials of the Empire, 5 Jews out of 7; Committee
of Inquiry on Assassination of Emperor, 7 Jews out of 10; Supreme Council of General
Economy 45 Jews out of 56, Bureau of First Soviet of Workmen and Soldiers of Moscow
19 Jews’out of 23; Central Committee of the 4ch Congress of Soviets, 33 Jews out ot
34- Executive Committee of the 5th Congress, o4 jews out of 62; Centra! Committee of
Social Democratic Party, 9 Jews out of 12; Grand Total, 447 Jews out ot 5-*5.

Peoples Communist Party Central Bureau, 5 Jews out of 6; Social Democratic Party
Central Committee, 11 Jews out of 11; Socialist Revolutionary Party of the Left, 10 Jews
out of 12. Marsden lists names, -md says "Jewry is a Bund with its own Seciet Govein-

ment 19 1 9 February issue N. Y. "Jewish Forum," by Rabbi Judah L. Magnesp "The

revolution in Russia set creative forces free—and look what a large company ot Jews

were available for immediate service!

1919 February 12 U S. Senate Overman Committee Report, Testimony of Rev.

George Albert Simons/of the Methodist Church "In December 1918, under a man
known as Apfelbaum (Zinovieff), out of 3S8 members (ot the Bolshevist Revolutionary

Committee) only 16 happened to be real Russians--* 1 the rest were Jews w,tn the ex¬

ception of a negro; and 265 of these came from the lower East Side of N. Y. City.

1919, March 29. London Times: "Of the leaders who provided the central machinery
of the Bolshevist movement, not less than 75% were jews."

1919, April 4, London Jewish Chronicle: "The ideals of Bolshevism are at many
points consonant with the finest ideals of Judaism.

1920 Jan. 11, "Bolshevism is Jewish," Editor A. S. Leese of England quotes Gen.
M Schuvier of the U. S. Armv as saying: "The Government of Russia is almost entirely
Jewish and our U. S. Army in Siberia was full of Bolshevist Jews d.rect from Moscow

J 1920, Feb.-Mar. issue of "Asia," reported "In All Bolshevist institutions the heads

ar€ J i920 Sept. 10 American Hebrew of N. Y.: "What Jewish Idealism and Jewish
discontent have so powerfully contributed to accomplish in Russia, the same historic
dualities are tending to promote in other countries." , . , , _ „

q 1920 July "World Significance of the Russian Revolution, preface by Dr. Oscar
Levy, London Jewish Savant, says: "Jewish elements provide the driving force for both
Communism and Capitalism.

13 2

1923, Dec. 13, Correspondent Claire Sheridan in the N. Y. World: "The Communists
are Jews, and Russia is entirely dominated by them."

1924, Dec. 19, U. S. Congressional Record quotes Jewish Chairman Zinovieff of
the Communist 3rd International: "We have exterminated the property owners in Russia.
We are going to do the same thing in Europe and America."

1933, Oct. 21 - 28 , London Catholic Herald. Dr. A. Homer: "The Soviet movement
was a Jewish and not a Russian conception. Of the 224 revolutionaries who in 1917 were
dispatched to Russia with Lenin to foment the Bolshevik Revolution. 170 were Jew's.
The Jewish Chronicle of Jan, <5, 1933. said: Over one-third of the Jews in Russia have
become officials.

1933. December "Opinion," a Jewish N. Y, Magazine under Rabbi S. S. Wise's
editorship; "With the rise of the Soviet Regime, jews have been granted rights not ac¬
corded even in the most advanced countries. The state, which previously did not employ
any Jews, now employs in White Russia 6 l'A Jewish officials. A Jew is commander of
the Ukranian Army; a jew is President of the State Bank; jews occupy almost all im¬
portant ambassadorial positions; universities, professions, judiciary and administration
now have a greater percentage of Jews than any other 'nationality. Anti-Semitism has
been declared a state offense, and is punished as counter-revolution. 1 ’

1934, February "New Outlook" Magazine of N. Y„ James Abbe, author of "1
Photograph Russia, says: "The men who control Russia are not Russians. Members of
the Jewish race from all over the world, predominate."

1933. Oct. 29, The New Masses," James Waterman W'ise, son of Rabbi S. S. Wise,
says: "Litvinoff. Yaroslavsky, Kaganowitsch. Radek, Bela Kuhn and Trotsky are Com¬
munist leaders in the Soviet." <All Jews.)

1936, February "Defender" Magazine of Wichita, Kan.: "The Central Committee
of the Communist Party at Moscow is the very heart-throb of international Communism.
There are 39 members, and 56 are Jews. The remaining three are married to Jewesses.

1937, ’GK’s Weekly," London, Feb. 4, quotes Hilaire Belloc, author of "The
Jews." thus; "As for any one who does.not know that the present revolutionary movement
is Jewish in Russia. I can only say that he is taken in by rhe suppressions of our
deplorable press."

1937, May London Catholic Times: "The Soviet Government has been and still is
largely composed of Jews."

1938, Feb, 10. "The Irish Catholic" of Dublin* quotes A. Stolvpine. son of former
Russian Minister who was assassinated by a Jew in 1911, "Stalin’s government has never
been and will never be a national government. Israel will always be a controlling power.

1938, Feb. 17, N. Y. Times Cable from Rome, Italy, quoting escaped Russian Envoy
Butenko to Rumania: "Tews control big industry, have a. monopoly of production, and
live lives of luxury in Russia."

1938. October, "Rulers of Russia." 34 pages, by Rev. Denis Fahey, quoting introduc¬
tion: "In this pamphlet f present to my readers a number of serious documents which go
to show that the real forces behind Bolshevism in Russia are Jewish forces, and rhat
Bolshevism is really an instrument in the hands of the Jews, for the establishment of
their future Messianic kingdom."

’The Bolshevik leaders here, most of whom are Jews ... are internationalists, and
are trying to start a worldwide revolution."—U. S. Ambassador Francis to Russia, taken
from his "Russia from the American Embassy," in Library of Congress.

"Through Thirty Years," a 1924 book by H. Wickham Steed, Bricish journalist::
"Schiff, Warburg and other international financiers, wished to bolster up the Jewish
revolutionaries to secure a field for Jewish exploitation of Russia"—reference being to
Jewish loans to promote the revolution.

"Impressions of Soviet Russia," a publication by Charles Sarolea, Edinburgh pro¬
fessor, student of Russian conditions for 35 years: "I am quite prepared to admit that
the Jewish Leaders (in Russia) are only a proportionately infinitesimal fraction; but it
is none the less true that those few Jewish leaders are THE MASTERS OF RUSSIA."

"The Hidden Hand," by Col. A. H. Lane of England: "The supreme conflict in rhe
world today is between anti-Bolshevism and Bolshevism, the tool and agent of the
Jewish Hidden Hand. In spite of Moscow 'executions’ so dramatically written up in the
Jew-controlled press of the world, the Jewish control of foreign-contact positions in
Russia remains unaffected,"

Victot Marsden, British-Russian Correspondent, Translator of "Protocols of Elders
of Zion," says Lenin was a Calmyc Jew, whose wife was Jewish and whose children spoke
Yiddish. Lenin attended Zionist meetings. Scotland Yard Detective H. T. Fitch, in
"The King's Shadow," said he served Lenin disguised as a waiter, and that he was a
"typical round-headed Jew.”

(The above record was prepared as a court exhibit in rebuttal of a Washington
1944 prosecution contrary allegation.)

ADDENDA

While engaged in the early part of the patriotic crusade in New York-
City I met Rev. George Albert Simons, referred to in the Overman Senate
Committee report. In his talks with me this Methodist minister more than
confirmed his tesrimony about Jewish rule in Russia, and said there was no
doubt in his mind thac it continued. He was subjected to persistent Jewish per¬
secution on his return to the U. S.

About this time I also met Dr. J. E. Conner, formerly U. S. Consul at St.
Petersburg during the revolution. He told me he saw automobiles driven by
Jews, machine-gunning crowds of people m the Russian capital. He reported to
Washington—and was soon thereafter removed from his post. He told me
that for years afterward he was Jew-hounded oyt of every position he obtained.
Finally, impoverished, he died in a Brooklyn, N. Y., Y. M. C. A. room.

JEWISH CAPITALISM BACKING COMMUNISM
(Edmondson Bulletin of Jan. 25. 1939)

Since jews have been historically notorious as capitalistic exploiters, what evidence
is there to support the charge that jews and Communism are allies and that International
Jewish Finance is backing Communism-Bolshevism-Socialism, the International Trinity
that is today trying to destroy Nationalism is a question skeptics frequently put.

Below are documentary references, including confessions from Jewish authorities, in¬
dicating that Jewish Leadership is using International -Communism-Bolshevism-Socialism
as a tool or weapon to exploit and break down. Gentile politics, economics, culture and
national Patriotism, the chief enemy of Jewish Internationalism.

"The Jew evolved organized capitalism and its working instrumentality, the banking
system," said the American Hebrew of Sept. 10, 1920. The jew Karl Marx, is "The
Earner of Communism."

In "The American Mercury" for April, 1935. Jewish Anarchist Emma Goldman
declared that the Soviet (Jewish established) had become the crassest form of State
capitalism."

"Who's Who in American Jewry" and Jewish "Rolls of Honor" place the Capitalist
Jews Baruch, Morgenthau. Brandeis and Lehman beside Communist Jew leaders Trotsky,
Litvinoff, Olgin, Blum et al.

In his book "The Truth about the Slump,” author A. N. Field points out: "The
enormously significant thing today is that the Jewish power of the purse and revolutionary
activities are working in a common direction, and there is a mass of evidence that they
are working in UNISON.

"When we 'sink' we become a revolutionary proletariat (Communistic); when we
rise, there arises also the terrible power of the purse (capitalistic).’—Theo Herzl in
"The Jewish State."

In his booklet. "The Jewish Assault on Christianity," Rev. Dr. G. B. Winrod of
■Wichita. Kansas, says: "h is impossible to separate Jewish Capitalism from Jewish
Communism. ’’

The London Catholic Herald or Oct. 21, 2S and Nov. 4, 1933, published: "Astute
Jew financiers would not be so stupid as to put vast amounts of Capital into the world¬
wide activities of Bolshevism (Communism) unless rhey were certain in their own
minds that their own interests and power were secure."

The N. Y. Times of June 28, 1934, said: "The underlying philosophy of the New-
Deal is the philosophy of” Justice Brandeis of the U. S. Supreme Court. The NRA is
almost a composite of his dissenting opinions."

The Arkansas Gazette of May HO, 1927. printed this evidence, "A check for $100
was received recently as a contribution by Commonwealth College of Mena, Ark., from
Louis D. Brandeis, Justice of the U. S. Supreme Court.” Thar college was investigated
as Communistic by the Arkansas Legislature.

The N. Y. Jewish Day of May 11, 1937, said: "The Rabbinical Assembly favors
the general tendency of the recently adopted social legislation, and in particular the
TVA.” Socialist Norman Thomas said the TVA was typically Socialist.

The Chicago Jewish Sentinel of Sept. 22, 1938, admics that: "The film industry
* * * absorbs its share—AND MORE—of Jewish refugees"—expelled as Communists
from Germany.

1 34

"COLONEL' 1 EDMONDSON PUT BACK INTO
JEWISH PUBLICITY
(Bulletin of Feb. 21, 1939)

"Father Charles E. Coughlin should be prosecuted because, in violation of
the Bill of Rights and the Constitution of the U. S. he persists in libeling the
Jewish Religion. He is amenable to both ecclesiastic law of the Catholic Church,
and also to the law of our country. If these battles should be initiated by our
government it may also have the salutary effect of forever silencing such
enemies who promote the destruction of American DEMOCRACY as Colonel
Robert Edward Edmondson of New York."

The above is from an article "By Julius Hochfelder, LL.M., Ph. D.,’ Page
4 of The California Jewish Voice, Feb. 3, 1939. Hochfelder is identified thus
in the 1938-9 "Who’s Who in American Jewry" Page 446: "Julius Hochfelder.
LL.M., Ph.D., member of Bar Assn, of N.Y., BORN HUNGARY, 1880. '

(Before exposing this foreign-born Jew lawyer’s misinterpretation of
American Constitutional Philosophy and Law, may the undersigned native-born
American veteran journalist first inject a personal note. By his article, I wel¬
come my return to the columns of rhe jewspapers. The conspiracy of silence in
this respect had become "deafening" since the American Hebrew' sometime ago
announced that nevermore would a certain No. 1 Anti-Semite be mentioned.
Now, I am grateful to "Hungarian’’ Hochfelder for having restored me to dis¬
favor, and it is with patriotic ardor that I redouble efforts, especially since he
has promoted me to the rank of COLONEL. Maybe increased loyalty to duty
will bring a Jewish GENERALSHIP.—or perchance, a medal, since Jews are
hell on medals. But, let’s look at the record and get down to business.)

Hochfelder says I’m destroying American "DEMOCRACY’' by exposing
Jewish anti-Americanism. Now', what is this "democracy?” The word doesn’t
appear in the Constitution of the U. S., and that historic document takes pains,
by Section 4, Article 4, to guarantee to every sovereign state of the American
Union "A Republican form of government."

It is worthy of note that the Central Conference of American Rabbis
(N. Y. Times, Sept. 13, 1936) challenged the American Christian Social
System, and demanded, in substitution therefor, "A Thoroughly Socialized
Democracy," which "Social Democracy” is described in Webster's Dictionary
as "The COMMUNIST PARTY in Russia.”

If such "Jewmocracy” is what Hochfelder means by "Democracy.” he can
bet his last shekel that I'm out to destroy ir in the U. S. A.l

NO GROUP LIBEL LAW

So much for the Philosophy of the American Government. Now, as to
American LAW. There is no law in the U. S. prohibiting the publishing of
a libel of any religion or group. The Constitution of The Republic and every
sovereign state within it substantially provides that no law shall be made
"respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise
thereof.” The Constitution of New York State properly adds: "The liberty of
conscience hereby secured shall not be so construed as to justify practices
inconsistent with the peace and safety of the state."

In dismissing May 10, 1938, the charge of "libel of all persons of the
Jewish Religion" in the Edmondson-LaGuaraia Case, Judge Wallace of New
York said in part: "After consideration of briefs submitted by The People,

1 3 5

The Defendant and amicus curiae, the Court, on its own motion, and IN
FURTHERANCE OF JUSTICE, dismisses the indictment which charges The
Defendant with 'libeling all persons of The Jewish Religion.

In a letter to the N. Y. Herald-Tribune, published Aug. 29 , 1936, Louis
Waldman, N. Y. lawyer, wrote as follows: "The remedy sought by Mayor
LaGuardia to be invoked against them (disseminators of anti-Semitic propa¬
ganda), is SOCIALLY DANGEROUS AND LEGALLY UNSOUND."

Here we have "Hungarian” Hochfelder on one side of the fence, and
another foreign-born Socialist Jew—"Russian” Waldman—on the other; both
sides as usual, promoting confusion, the "divide and rule” policy of Inter¬
national Jewry.

However, che undersigned thanks "Hungarian” Hochfelder for affording
the opportunity of using his legal "masterpiece" as a sounding board for more
exposure publicity—and cordially invites him to "come again!"

UNMASKING CONGRESSMAN SABATH
(Feb. 23, 1939 Broadcast)

(An Open Defense-Letter, February 28, 1939)

To Congressman Adolph J. Sabath of Illinois,

Chairman of The House Rules Committee,

Washington, D.C.

Sir:

On Feb. 13, 1939, replying to a lettc-r of Feb. 6 from Walter Steele,
General Manager of the National Republic Magazine, in which he protested
his branding as an Anti-Semitic promoter by Congressman Marcantonio, you
included the following provocative paragraph, wherein you "extended yourself”
under the immunity of The Floor—as printed on Page 2238 of the Congres¬
sional Record of Feb. 17, 1939, thereby making a public document:

"Col. E. N. Sanctuary * * * Eastern Represenative of Col H. A. Jung of
the American Vigilant Intelligence Federation of Chicago * * * is an associate
of THE MOST VICIOUS AND CRIMINAL ANTI-SEMITES IN AMERICA
—such men as Robert Edward Edmondson and James True. And behind all
these is the High Priestess of the Nazi-movement in America, Mrs. Elizabeth
Dilling. The assembled facts show' that you (Steele) are indeed, as Congress¬
man Marcantonio charged, closely identified with ’the most dangerous, un¬
democratic, un-American and subversive groups in the U. S.”

I note that Who's Who in America Jewry reports you as having been
BORN IN CZHCHO-SLOVAKIA.

In the Feb. 12, 1939, issue of the Constitutional Protective League of
Illinois, Inc., 2405 Board of Trade Bldg., Chicago, I find the following
quotation from the Sept., 1936, report of the Illinois National Defense
Council:

"Adolph Sabach: In Congress 30 years. Has never voted for national
defense movements within our program. * * * We have repeatedly found that
plans for national defense are not safe in his hands."

Congressman Marcantonio is reported as heading the International Labor
Defense, which is described thus in Mrs. Dilling’s "Red Network"-—"The
American section of the controlled Communist International Red Aid; legally
aids and propagandizes in behalf of Communist criminals arrested for revolu¬
tionary activities; co-operating with American Civil Liberties Union”'—the

1 36

Frankfurter-Ernst-Hays Jewish organisation, champion of communizers. Mar-
cantonio is not listed as a Jew, although his activities are oro-Jewish; but for
the. present we may classify him according to the formula now proclaimed in
New York, viz.: 'New Dealers are circumcised Democrats.”

But—what is there "vicious” about my "stuff?” Is it because the publica¬
tions are documentary reproductions of what the Jews sav about themselves
and how they are propaganda-blinding, confusion-dividing and politically-
ruling gullible Gentiles? In THAT respect I concede that the term is "vicious/’
And I forsee a dreadful reckoning!

What is there "criminal” about my publications? In dismissing, May 10,
1938, the Jewish-Majority Grand Jury indictment against me in Jewish La-
Guardia’s N. Y. City, charging "libel of all persons of the Jewish Religion"
because I exposed Jewish communizing activities, the court said the dismissal
was "in the furtherance of justice." Where is the criminality? Did vou
deliberately LIE?

As usual, the Jewish prosecution hid behind the complaint-title "The
People of the State of New York versus Robert Edward Edmondson;" but it
was smoked out. Defendant Edmondson subpoenaed "Princes of Jewry" Bernard
Baruch, Felix Frankfurter, Henry Morgenthau, Rabbi Wise, Samuel Untermyer,
Mayor LaGuardia, James P. Warburg, Walter Lippmann, Justice Samuel l.
Rosenman. Whereupon your American Jewish Committee and the American
Jewish Congress PETITIONED THE COURT NOT TO TRY THE CASE
because the indictment violated the free speech guarantee of the Constitution.

Are you Jews afraid to face facts? You certainly could not have feared an
humble individual patriot like myself, with one lone lawyer and a few Jew-
deflated dollars for defence—as against a thousand Jewish lights backed by
billions.

No, Mr. Congressman, Jews are afraid of the TRUTH. They know that a
few grains of it, plus a little courage, will blow the lid off when publicized.

You have emphasized "undemocratic groups" in connection with your

denunciation of the undersigned. As a citizen of a republic—not a democracy_

I plead guilty to that charge, since a democracy, particularly the Social Demo-
ocracy demanded by your Central Conference of American Rabbis, is COM¬
MUNISTIC. You can count on me as being against such democracy to the last
ditch.

You Jews call me "Professional Patriot." Well, I’d rather be that than a
"Professional Jew” or a "Professional Politician,” both of whom contribute
destruction to the Gentile state, whereas a "Professional Patriot” contributes
something constructive to the country that shelters him. However that may be.
Mr. Congressman, my patriotic "nest” is almost as bare as Mother Hubbard’s
cupboard; but I’ll bet your "coffers are full" of America’s hospitable bounty.

1 3 7

SOUTH AFRICA WARNS JEWS

Extracts from speech delivered by Eric H. Louw Feb. 24, 1939. in the
South African House of Assembly on the "Alien and Immigration Bill," are
reproduced below:

"I am convinced that if it were possible to remove Jewish influence and
pressure FROM THE PRESS AND NEWS AGENCIES, the international
outlook would be considerably brighter. In introducing this bili I am actuated
neither by Fascism nor Racialism. I have acted solely as a South African. The
main principle of this bill is that it admits the existence in South Africa of a
Jewish Problem. It is perhaps appropriate that Communism should be dealt
with in a bill which also deals with the Jewish Question because Communism,
since its earliest day.s, has been linked with Jewry.

"Communism is International, and a Jew' is International in his outlook.
Communism had its birth in the teachings of Karl Marx, a Jew. I remember the
Soviet delegation to the League of Nations included seven Jews and one
Russian. We find that in most countries where Communism has taken coot, the
leaders of Communism are Jews.

"The Communist makes no distinction whatever on political, social or
economic grounds, between the black and white races, which is particularly
important for us in South Africa.

"Why is the principle of discrimination introduced into my bill? Because,
in the first place, the Jew is not assimilable, That he is not assimilable has
been shown by the records of history, and it is also admitted by himself. Even
in America, the so-called melting-poc of the world, Jews have remained a
separate nation.

"Ludwig Lewisohn, a well-known Jewish writer, says: 'Assimilation is
impossible, because the Jew cannot change his national character.’ I find in
'A Book of Jewish Thoughts' by Dr. J. H, Hertz, this statement: 'What I
understand by assimilation is loss of identity. It is the kind of assimilation I
dread most, even, more than pogroms/ Basil M. Henriques, a distinguished
Jew, made a speech in London reported in the Zionist Record of South Africa,
Jan. 29, 1939, saying: 'There must be no assimilation. We are a peculiar
people, and a peculiar people we must remain.’ Ludwig Lewisohn also says;
'We are a people; we are a nationality,’

"Another Jewish factor which causes friction is Jewish control of finance
and business, the formation of monopolies, and domination of the professions.
This is particularly so with regard to high finance and international banking.
The International banker controls credit, and through it he controls industry
and trade.

"In Johannesburg 659c of the attorney firms are Jewish; in Cape Town
the attorneys are 41 % Jewish. As regards medical practitioners, in Johannesburg
48% are Jews; in Cape Town 31%.

"May I commend, Sir, to this House and also to the members who arc
Jews, and to Jews outside of this house, the words of a man who is a friend of
the Jews—Author Hiiaire Belloc, who says; 'There is a Jewish Problem, and
the Jews who resent the statement of the problem and an attempt at solving
it, are not doing their own people any good ; and they arc- at the same time
denying us the right to put our own house in order—WHICH IS OF
COURSE INTOLERABLE.’ "

1 3 8

''AMERICAN MASQUERADERS"

(Mar. 7. 1939, Edmondson Bulletin)

Under the smear-title "Fascism in America," the March 6, 1939, issue of
the weekly magazine "Life,” published in The Ghetto of the Nation, lists in
part as below, anti-Communist U. S. agencies as "American Masqueraders,” in
a pro-Jew article covering eight full pages, designed to belittle a recent Madison
Square Garden huge anti-Jew mass meeting.

American Nationalist Confederation; League for Constitutional Govern¬
ment of N. Y.; The Reveaier of Wichita, Kan.; The American Guard; Rev,
Charles E. Coughlin of Royal Oak, Mich.; Dr. G. B. Winrod of Kansas;
George W. Christians of Chattanooga, Tenn.; James True of Washington,
D. C.; Robert Edward Edmondson of N. Y.. AND GENERAL GEORGE
VAN HORN MOSELEY AND SENATOR ROBERT R. REYNOLDS.

Of General Moseley "Life” says; "He made a bitter anti-New Deal out¬
burst on his retirement fast year.’’ SO—you are anti-Semitic if you are against
the New Deal. Q.E.D.: THE NEW DEAL IS JEW1SH-COMMUNIST!

That 22,000 attendance of anti-Jews at Madison Square Garden recently,
plus many Red-Jew violence incidents in N. Y. City before and after, that are
omitted from the jewspapers, prove that the Big Town has become JEW-
CONSCIOUS.

"Life” is in the same classification as the "tycoon magazine” "Fortune";
is managed by the Larsen-Luce crowd of ''Time/' and carries the following fine
old American names as staff members on Page 90, March 6, 1939: Joseph
Kastner, A. Heiskell, R. Ruhi, B, Shrjfe, Rachel Albertson, David Cort, Bern¬
ard Hoffman, Albert Eisenstadt.

To any open intelligent mind, "Life” exposes its hand, as well as its ignor¬
ance (?) of the Communist-Fascist matter at the beginning by diversively de¬
claring: "There is one profound difference which makes Fascism a far greater
menace to America than Communism.” Communism is a frank proposition to
change America's whole Way of Life * * * but Fascism begins as a call to
fearful men to unite against clutching enemies.”

Compare the foregoing sophistry with the following bullseye from
Columnist Mark Sullivan — as published in the N. Y. Herald Tribune
(9-20-38); "In any country where Communism goes far enough, the next de¬
velopment is sure. The Fascist principle rises to neutralize Communism. If
America resists Communism, IT NEED NOT FEAR FASCISM.”

In addition to that, "Life” quotes as high authority for its production the
notorious Rev. L. M. Birkhead, Kansas City churchman who takes expensive
trips abroad and at home smelling out Jew-Expose agencies which are putting
revolutionary internationalists on the spot.

Reputation-Destroyer "Life" seeks to arouse class hatred against the patri¬
otic agencies it "blacklists" by using methods outlined by the Jewish Institution
For Propaganda Analysis, notably in saying: "Each (agency) derives its in¬
spiration and guidance, IF NOT ITS PAY, from a foreign eovernment.”

So far as I personally am concerned, "Life” lies on most of the counts
listed. I believe the other patriots mentioned would "sign that” refutation. When
"Life” Jews say in one breath that they have bankrupted Germany by their
International Boycott on it for expelling Jew-Communists, and in the next pro¬
claim that Hitler is financing all the Fascists, anyone with a grain of common
sense will explode with hilarity.

139

"Facts of Record, are few" about these agencies, remarks "Life." My own
journalistic record is known to more than ten million people in the U. S. A.
and elsewhere.

We American patriots would like nothing better than to stand up before
the Dies Committee and turn our pockets inside out. Dickstem twice backed
down, after summoning me before his "Nazi-Exposure" Committee.

One last word to "Life": Thanks for the publicity! Any kind is better than
none! We patriots can’t yet strike off the chains from The Press; but coming
events are casting their shadows before. Controllers of the press won’t let the
public know the other side. That is suppression.

We patriots are going to force you to publicize us. We know how to goad
you into committing overt acts, AND WE’RE GOING TO DO IT,

Thanks particularly for lining us up with General Moseley and Senator
Reynolds. We are glad you put us in the proper class.

"LOOK" IMITATES '’LIFE"

"Look” of 2-28-39 imitates "Life," and says: "Robert Edward Edmondson
aspires to be America’s Goebbels. He has no organization, but busies himself
distributing Fascist propaganda."

No, Edmondson "aspires" to nothing but the Salvation of The Republic;
but he admits that, as dictator of a properly financed "ad-less" national daily
newspaper he could, with such power publicly LIBERATE FORCES WHICH
WOULD EFFECT EMANCIPATION WITHIN SIX MONTHS.

MARK TWAIN'S INDICTMENT OF JEWS

(The following was broadcast in the U. S. bv Edmondson Bulletin of
Jan. 3, 1939:)

Mark Twain, the famous author (Samuel Clemens in private life), it has
been alleged by Jews, was pro-Jewish. However that may be, his daughter
married a Jew, the Russian-born pianist Ossip Gabrilowitsch (Salamonovitch).
Occasionally the humorist wrote in a jocular way about the Jews; but in the
March, 1898, issue of Harper’s Magazine, under the heading "Concerning The
Jews," he compiled a devastating analysis of Jew activities, which article was
reproduced in a volume entitled "The Man That Corrupted Hadleyburg" and
other stories by Mark Twain, 1900 copyright. The last edition of this book
was issued in 1928, copyrighted by Mrs, Gabrilowitsch—AND THE ARTICLE
"CONCERNING THE JEWS” WAS DELETED. From the article published
in Harper’s Magazine in 1898 the following extracts are taken in review:

"Can fanaticism alone account for this ("Jewish Persecution”)? It is now'
my conviction that it is responsible for hardly any of it. In this connection I
call to mind Genesis, Chapter XLVII. We have all read the story of the years
of plenty and the years of famine in Egypt, and how Joseph, with that oppor¬
tunity MADE A CORNER IN BROKEN HEARTS, AND THE CRUSTS
OF THE POOR, AND HUMAN LIBERTY'—a corner whereby he took the
nation’s money all away, to the last penny; took a nation’s livestock all away,
to the last hoof; took a nation’s land away, to the last acre. Then took the
nation itself, buying it for bread, man by man, woman by woman, child by
child, till ALL WERE SLAVES; a corner which took everything, left nothing;
a corner so stupendous that, by comparison with it, the most gigantic corners

14 0

in subsequent history are but baby things; for it dealt in hundreds of millions
of bushels, and its profits were reckoned by hundreds of millions of dollars,
and it was a disaster so crushing that its effects have not wholly disappeared
from Egypt today, more than 3000 years after the event.

JEWISH CHARACTER FORMATION

Was Joseph establishing a character for his race which would survive long
in Egypt, and in time would his name be familiarly used to express that
character—like Shylock’s? IT IS HARDLY TO BE DOUBTED. Let us remem¬
ber that this was CENTURIES BEFORE THE CRUCIFIXION!

"I wish to come down 1800 years later, and refer to a remark made b\
one of the Latin historians . . . The substance of that remark was rhis: Some
Christians were persecuted in Rome through error, they being ’MISTAKEN
FOR JEWS!’ The meaning seems plain. These pagans had nothing against
Christians, but they were quite ready to persecute Jews. For some reason they
hated a Jew BEFORE they even knew what a Christian was. Mav I not assume
that persecution of Jews is a thing which ANTEDATES CHRISTIANITY,
AND WAS NOT BORN OF CHRISTIANITY- I think so.

"In the U. S. cotton states, after the war . . . The Jew came down in force
("carpetbaggers” ?),-set up shop on the plantation, supplied all the negroes'
wants on credit, and at the end of the season was proprietor of the negro's
shaie of the present crop and part of the next one. Before long, the whites
detested the Jew.

"The Jew is being legislated out of Russia. The reason is not concealed.
The movement was instituted because the Christian peasant stood no chance
againsr his commercial abilities. The Jew was always ready to lend on a crop.
When settlement day came he owned the crop; the next year he owned the
farm—LIKE JOSEPH.

"In the England of John’s time everybody got into debt to the Jew. He
gathered all lucrative enterprises into his hands. He was the King of Com¬
merce. He had to be banished from the realm. For like reasons Spain had to
banish him 400 years ago, and Austria about a couple of centuries later.

"In all ages Christian Europe has been obliged to curtail his activities. If
he entered upon a trade, The Christian had to retire from it. If he set up as a
doctor, he took the business. If he exploited agriculture, the other farmers had
to get at something else. The law had to step in to save the Christian from the
poor-house. Still, almost bereft of employments, he found ways to make money,
EVEN TO GET RICH. This history has a most sordid and practical com¬
mercial look. Religious prejudices may account for one parr of it, BUT NOT
FOR THE OTHER NINE.

"Protestants have persecuted Catholics—BUT THEY DID NOT TAKE
THEIR LIVELIHOODS AWAY FROM THEM. Catholics have persecuted
Protestants—BUT THEY NEVER CLOSED AGRICULTURE AND THE
HANDICRAFTS AGAINST THEM. I feel convinced that the crucifixion has
not much to do with the world's attitude toward the Jew; that the reasons for
it are older than that event.

JEWISH MONOPOLY IN GERMANY

"In Berlin a few years ago I read a speech which frankly urged THE
EXPULSION OF THE JEWS FROM GERMANY. And the agitator’s reason

1 4 I

was this: 'Eighty-five per cent of the successful lawyers of Berlin were Jews;
and that about the same percentage of the great businesses ol all sorts in Ger¬
many were IN THE HANDS OF THE JEWS.' THE MOTIVE OF PERSE¬
CUTION STANDS OUT AS CLEAR AS DAY. In Vienna an agitator said
those details were true of Austria-Hungary.

"I am convinced that the persecution of the jew is not m any large degree
due to religious prejudice. No, the Jew is a monev-getter. He made it the end
and aim of his life. He was at it in Rome; HE HA.S BEEN AT IT EVER
SINCE. His success has made the whole human race his enemy.

"You will say that the Jew is everywhere numerically feeble. When I read
in the Encyclopedia Britannica that the Jewish population in the U. S. was
250.000 I wrote the editor, and explained to him I was personally acquainted
with more Jews than that in my country, and that his figures were without
doubt a misprint of 25.000,000. People told me that they had reasons to suspect
that for business reasons many Jews did not report themselves as Jews. It looks
plausible. I am strongly of the opinion that we have AN IMMENSE JEWISH
POPULATION IN AMERICA. I am assured bv men competent to speak that
JEWS ARE EXCEEDINGLY ACTIVE IN POLITICS.

"Will persecution of the Jew ever come to an end? On the score of re¬
ligion, I think it has already come to an end. On the score of race prejudice
and trade, I have the idea that it will continue. Race prejudice is no particular
matter. Jewish persecution is not a religious passion. IT IS A BUSINESS
PASSION."

EDMONDSON ANSWERS MISS THOMPSON'S QUERIES

I take pleasure in truthfully answering queries submitted by Miss Dorothy
Thompson, so far as lies within my power, in the following "open letter" of
March 8, 1939:

"Dear Miss Thompson:

Although you have not seen fit, in your letter of March 3, to enable me
to reply to my correspondents with original-source-infomnarion about yourself,
I herewith gladly comply with your requests. Taking up the paragraphs of your
communication seriatim:

(1) For your enlightenment, an Investment-Economist and a Public
Relations Counsel (both of which appear as titles on my letterhead), are
directly concerned in root causes in American Economic and Political fields—
which have been invaded and wrecked by jews; over 2900 ot them listed in
Who's Who in American Tewry as foreign-born—all evidently summoned to
this "Promised Land" by other Jews born here who have made it A Milking
Pot instead of assimilating into integral Americanism's socalled Melting Pot.

Consequently, the Brandeis-Frankfurter-Morgenthau-Baruch Jewish "School
of Thought’’ is now dominating the politico-economic affairs of the nation
with an alien and anti-American "Way of Life" that is destroying The Republic
by trying to substitute for it the rabbi-promulgated "Thoroughly Socialized
Democracy"—described in Webster’s Dictionary as "Social Democracy,’’ THE
COMMUNISM OF RUSSIA.

(2) It would be physically impossible, in the first place, to furnish you
with a list of the names of the patriots who finance my publications because
they reach from the Atlantic to the Pacific Coasts, and from the Great Lakes to

1 4 2

the Gulf of Mexico, and are the great middle clash of The Republic. Absolutely
no Hitler-Mussolini financing has been received. However, such would be as
acceptable as were the German volunteers George Washington welcomed into
his Libration Army at the birth of the Republic.

In the second place, to send YOU such names would be the-act of a Judas-
betrayer—as you are apparently allied with those whom I regard as enemies of
my country.

You point out that "Who’s Who" doesn't provide ANY data about me.
That is correct. Since my Jew-exposure bulletins, with my complete record
(including a real-likeness-photo), are known among over 10,000,000 Ameri¬
cans—so many more than Who’s Who’s circulation—I did not think it necessary
co BUY SPACE- in Who's Who. It pleases me very much to have confirmation,
in the first sentence of your letter, as to the "widespread publicity" 1 am giving
tc the cause of patriotism.

If you ask for it. I'll send you a copy of letter from fromer President
David Brown of the American Hebrew, wherein, after stating that he had
exhaustively investigated my record, he was forced to give me "a clean bill of
health" professionally and otherwise, excepting my "poisonous" Jewish Anti-
Americanism documents,

HOW KEY JEWS RULE THE U. S. A.

(From Edmondson Bulletin of March 13, 19?Q)

In this pamphlet is presented "Key jews” resident in America, promin¬
ently appearing in the public press. Most of checking for accuracy has been
in "Who’s Who in American Jewry"—although certain important U. S. Jews
have been omitted from that big book for some mysterious reason, while
France’s Blum, Russia’s Finkeistein-Litvinoff, Britain’s Hore-Belisha, Mexico’s
Trotsky and other foreign Jews have been listed in this "American" Jewish
"honor-RolI.”

Count of the Jews listed in the Jewish Who’s Who shows that it contains
over 2900 who were born abroad. The first point to keep in mind in this
connection is that these foreign-born Jews have attained the status very
quickly of "KEYS," or they would not be incorporated in this cream list.

The second vital point to hold in mind is chat Jew's will not assimilate and
become an integral part of Americanism, but remain a notorius "Jewish Soli¬
darity Forever," which is essentially a Nation within a Nation.

The question arises: If Jewish Religious PRACTICES are a menace to the
peace and safety of the state, isn’t the U. S. Supreme Court Mormon decision a
religious precedent for Jewry's expulsion from America—just as is the Asiatic
Exclusion Act a ''racial" precedent?

Like other members of their Tribe, these foreign-born Jews promptly
"settle upon the glands” of our American System as Educator Jews, Doctor
Jews, Lawyer Jews, Legislator Jews, Political Jews, Social Worker Jews,
Publicity Jews, Economic Jews, Financial Jew's, Movie Jew-s, Radio Jews, and
Government Jews—parasiticallv eating out the sustenance we have created.
In short, instead of regarding America as the Melting Pot of Humanity, they
make it the Milking Pot for International Jewry.

143

The great influx of foreign-born revolutionary Jews, upon analysis, is
shown to be chiefly from Russia, Poland, Hungary, Rumania and Austria,
called "Eastern jews,” viz., Tribesmen from Asia—"Mongol Jews.”

Many people believe that modern Freemasonry is a Christian secret society.
Ic will enlighten them to know that more than 1700 Jews listed in Who’s Who.
in American Jewry are Masons—245 Thirty-Second Degree and 23 Thirty-
Third Degree, which is regarded as representing "the elect.” President Franklin

D. Roosevelt is a 32d degree Shriner Mason. Many Rabbis are Masons. Rabbi
Isaac M. Wise wrote in "The Israelite of America,’’ of August 3, 1866:
'Masonry is a Jewish institution whose history, degrees, charges, pass-words
and explanations are Jewish from beginning to end."

U. S. POLITICAL "KEY-JEWS"

President Franklin D. Roosevelt's "Key-Advisor-Jews"

Bernard M. Baruch, "Unofficial President, "Prince of Jewry.

U. S. Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter {born Austria), "Legal Master-Mind,"
"Karl Marx Professor.”

U, $. Supreme Court Justice L. D, Brandeis (retired), "Father of New Deal,” says
Jews are a nationality.”

Henry Morgenthau, Jr. Secretary of Treasury. Federal Reserve System boss.

Herbert Feis, "key” for Secretary of State Hutl {wife a Jewess), known as "Brains of
Stare Department."

Mordecai Ezekiel, "key" for Secretary of Agriculture, author of the illegal AAA.

Nathan Margotd {born Rumania), “key" for Secretary of Interior kites,

Isidor Lubin, "key” for Secretary Perkins of Labor Dept., aided by Leo Wolman, Cecilia
Razovsky, C. E. Wyzanski, David Dubinsky, Max Zaritsky, Rose Schneiderman.
Thurman Arnold and Harold Nathan, "keys" for Attorney-General, aided by Ben], V,
Cohen, Roosevelt's legislation-expert-framer.

William C. Bullitt, Ambassador to France.

Lawrence Steinhardt, Samuel Untermyer’s nephew. Ambassador to Peru.

Harry F. Guggenheim, Aeronautic Counsel.

E. A. Goldenweiser (born Russia), Federal Reserve Bank System Research Director.

Wm. M. Leiserson {born Esthonia), Chairman National Mediation Board.

David J. Saposs (born Russia), National Labor Relations Board Economist.

Sidney Hillman (born Lithuania), Communistic CIO backer.

Jerome N. Frank. Stock Exchange Commission Director.

Nathan Strauss. Housing Authority.

D. E. Lilienthal, Tennessee Valley Electric Power Authority Director.

Abe Fortas, Gen. Counsel PWA.

CONGRESSMEN

Sol Bloom of New York, Democrat.

Emanuel Celler of N. Y., Democrat.

Samuel Dickstein of N. Y.. Democrat (born Russia).

Adolph Sabath of Illinois, Democrat (born Czecho-Slovakia).

M. Edelscein of N. Y., Democrat,

Leo Sacks of Pennsylvania, Democrat.

STATE GOVERNORS

Herbert H. Lehman of N. Y., International Banker.

Henry Horner of Illinois.

Payne Ratner of Kansas.

NEW YORK "KEY-JEWS"

Mayor F. H. LaGuardia.

Postmaster Albert Goldman.

Stanley M. Isaacs, President Manhattan Borough.

Samuel Fassler. Building Commissioner, born Austria,

Park Commissioner Robert H. Moses.

JUDGES

Julian W. Mack, Edgar H. Lauer, Alfred Frankenthaier, Louis Goldstein. Louis B
Brodsky (born Russia), Louis A. Abrams,, Bernard L. Shientag, Isidor Wasservogel,
Aaron Steuer, Edward B. Koch, J. Sidney Bernstein, Jacob Panken (bom Russia,) Nathan

I 44

D. Perlman (born Poland), Anna M. Kross (born Russia), Samuel I. Rosemnan,
Samuel Mandeibaum (born Poland), G. M. Moskowitz, Louis L. Cohen, Peter A. Abeles
(born Rumania), Max Salomon, Justice Wise Policzer, Isidor I, Haber. Morris Ede'r,
Irving Ben Cooper (born London), Morris Rothenberg (born Estonia), Charles Solomon,
Jacob Eilperin, Lester Lazarus, Abraham Goldman, Charles Marks, Joseph M. Proskauer,
Irwin Untermyer, Alfred Cohen, Edward Lazansky, Mark Rudich (born Rumania).

"AMERICAN” LABOR PARTY

Executive Committee of 50 includes these names: Joseph Breslau (born Russia):
Meyer Bernstein, Joseph E. Brill, David Dubinsky (born Poland), T. J. Bambrick, Abe
Chatman, Myer C. Finestone, Nathan Frankel, Harry Greenberg, Louis Hendon, Sidney
Hillman (born Lithuania), Julius Hochman, Louis Hollender (born Poland), Abe Mendel-
witz, Abraham Miller, Isador Nagel (born Poland), Samuel Permutter, Jacob S. Poto-
sofsky, (born Russia), Alex Rose (born Poland, Secretary), Emil Schlesinger, Rose
Schneidermann (born Russia), Samuel Schorr, Nathaniel Spector, Louis Waidman (bom
Russia), Meyer Weinstein, Samuel Wolchok, Max Zaricsky {born Russia), Chas. Zim¬
merman, S. M. Biinken, Samuel Noll. (Mayor F. H. LaGuardia of N. Y. City, is enrolled
as a member of The "American" Labor Party),

THE AMERICAN PRESS "KEY JEWS”

Authors

Scholem Asch (born Poland), Rabbi Lewis Browne (bom England), Conrad
Bercovici (born Rumania), John Cournos (born Russia), Rabbi Solomon B. Freehof
(bom England), Waldo Frank, Montague Glass, Arthur Guiteimann (born Austria),
Henry H. Klein (born Hungrav), Ludwig Lewisohn (bom Rumania), Rabbi Lee ),
Levmger, Maurice Samuel (born Rumania), Geo, Seldes, Sidney Herschell Small, Rosika
Schwimmer (born Hungray), Louis Untermyer.

JOURNALISTS

F. P, Adams, Alter Brody (born Russia), Benj. de Casseres, Edna Ferber. Rabbi
Louis D. Gross, Maurice Hindus, W. B. Ziff, Fanny Hurst, Ben Hecht, Geo. S. Kaufman,
Emil Ludwig-Cohen (born Germany), Walter Lippmann, David Lawrence, Louis Lipsky,
Eugene Lyons (bom Russia), Isaac F. Marcosson, Rabbi Samuel Margoshes (born
Galicia), Charles Michaelson, Rabbi Lewis I. Newman, M. J. Olgin (born Russia);
Bernard Postal, Joseph Pulitzer, Dorothy Parker, Louis Rittenberg (born Hungray),
M. S, Rukeyser, Morrie Ryskind, Marcus Eli Ravage (bom Rumania), Geo. E. Sokolsky,
Philip Slomovit 2 , (born Russia), John L. Spivak, Herbert Bayard Swope, Walter
Winchell. James Waterman Wise, Frederick William Wile, Max Winkler (born Rum¬
ania), Morris Fishbein (editor of American Medical Journal).

PUBLISHERS

Moses Annenberg of Philadelphia (bom Prussia); David A. Brown, of Detroit •
Lowell Brentano, of New York; Paul Block; J. H. Biben, of New York; Abraham
Cahan, of New York (born Russia): Levand Bros., of Kansas; Adler Chain, in North¬
west; Eugene Meyer, Jr., of Washington, D. C.; Arthur G. Newman of New York
Journal; Liberty’s Bernarr McFadden of N. Y.; J. David Stern, of New York- Arthur
Hays Sulzberger, of New York Times; David Schapiro, of New York (born Poland).
The editorial departments of the newspapers are controlled chiefly through Jewish ad¬
vertising influence. Many Jews are in the Asso. Press and United Press Assn., and the
Hearst papers are Jew-directed.

RADIO

Wm. S. Paley, President Columbia Broadcasting System; David Sarnoff, President Radio
Corporation of America, dominaring National Broadcasting Co. Many individual broad¬
casting stations are Jewish-owned, as shown by the directorates.

MARCANTONIO A LIAR?

(Edmondson Bulletin March 2 5, 1939)

Congressman Vito Marcantonio made the following speech on the floor
of The House Feb. 3, 1939, against extension of the Dies Committee Investi¬
gation of Communism—and lost. In that deliver) 7 he remarked (see Congres¬
sional Record):

The two MOST VICIOUS ANTI-SEMITES in America are Robert
Edward Edmondson and James True, Edmondson will be remembered as the
man who was arrested under charges of criminal libel brought by Mayor
LaGuardia and other leading citizens of New York. He is best known as the
most prolific writer of anti-Semitic literature, according to a University of

145

Chicago study by D. S. Strong, published last year; and in recognition of this
fact hts been invited several times to speak before the Naz, Bund in N. Y Ci R
Ap , m in th- case of Edmondson, anti-bemitism and anti-New LX-almn are
brought together in the person of Howland Spencer, EDMONDSON S CHILE

BACKER."

In order to set the record straight, I wrote March 11 as follows to
Marcantonio:

■■a, reported by (he Congressional Record of Feb. 3, 1939, your speech opposing
the e«e„Z of thl aYoYXuriiM invested,>ns uf the Dies O.mmmee int.de the

following statements:

showed the

under-

"( 1) That the undersigned is 'a vicious anti-Semite:

"(2) That a University of Chicago study published last year'

sicned to be the most prolific anti-Semitic writer; _

" ( 3 ) That 'Edmondson's chief backer is Howland Spencer. Hudson River aristocrat.

(4 ) That { was arrested under charges of criminal libel brought by Mayor La^uatdta
of New York and other prominent New Yorkers.

Webster’s Dictionary defines "vicious" as addicted to vice or morally
corrupted' in principles or conduct." That would be libelously actionable,
uttered "off The Floor," being false.

From the University of Chicago Press the following ww received by tire
Edmondson Agency: "THIS IS NOT OUR PUBLICATION. lmrther in¬
vestigations developed a letter of March 7, signed by O. S. Strong, Wes c, n
Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, saying: Marcantonio ERRED in stating
that this study had been published. It exists only in_ the lorm ot a tew type-
written copies, one of which ! lent the Congressman.

The following letter has been received from Howland Spencer, dated
March 7, 1939:

"Dear Mr. Edmondson:

"Replying to your leter of March 4, 1939. This letter will be authority tor
my statement that 1 never contributed one dollar to the Edmondson jc\\-
Exposure Patriotic Crusade; my only contributions being .muits reprinted
from the Highland Post under the pen-name ’ Sep ire ot Krum Elbow loi
the printing of which I personally paid, and which circular, were distnbuted
through the medium of the Edmondson Service.

The foregoing speaks for itself. Does this make Marcantonio a deliberate

liar?

Marcantonio cold half the truth and misrepresented the technical prosecu¬
tion. The charge read: "The People of The State of New York Against Robert
Edward Edmondson," having been brought by a Jewish-Maiority Grand Jury
for "libel of all persons of the Jewish Religion." But Marcantonio iorgot
to sav that the court unconditionally dismissed the charge May 10, 19aS, m
furtherance of justice." Marcantonio knew about this, but failed to tell the
whole truth to his colleagues of The House, thereby laying himself open to
the suspicion of trying to mislead them in an important action.

"American Labor Party, born N. Y. City, Dec. 10, 1902, lawyer" is the
complete information about himself Marcantonio supplied to the Congressional
Directory of January, 1939-

But we have looked up Marcantonio's record elsewhere. It smc-lis Com-
nmnistfcally Kosher throughout. "American Labor Party" membership involves
obedience to its Executive Council, which is composed mostly of Jews.

1 4 6

Marcantonio is "National President of the International Labor Defense."
branded "Red" by the Dilling Red Network book of radicals. SASHA Small,
Publication Director, sends out literature of the organization. On his letterhead
appear 22 Jewish out of 39 other names, some of which may also be Jewish.

I understand this New Dealer loose-talker not only denies he is lewish,
but that he is not a Communist. What do you say?

PROOF OF CONSPIRACY TO COMMUNIZE U. S. A.

The following letter of March 22, 1939. from Robert Edward Edmondson
js self-explanatory:

Hon. Martin Dies,

Chairman, Committee Investigating un-Americanism
Washington, D. C.

Dear Congressman Dies:

I have been informed that you are being importuned to summon me
before your Committee to investigate reports, viz.: (1) I am a "Nazi Spy"
hiding out in the Pocono Mountains of Pennsylvania (half a mile from
Pennsylvania Highway No. 115); that (2) My power-publicity exposing
Jewish commumzing of The Republic is financed by Hitler-Germany; that (3)

I am working for a Fascist Dictatorship of America; and that (4) I ouuht to
be deported at once. '

It would give me unalloyed pleasure to appear before your Committee any
time anywhere, and tell The Truth, THE WHOLE TRUTH, and Nothing but
lhe Truth, as to my exposures of the Jewish Politico-Economic System’s plans
and acts to wreck America through communization.

As "publicity is the only cure" for this public evil—Jewish anti-American¬
ism and as daily papers are under Jewish-advertising and ocher coercive
control, little good would be accomplished by distortion or suppression of
testimony Hence, I have hitherto regarded ''hearings/' etc., as more or less
or little effect,

If we could get broadcast publicity in this case, the result would be highly
beneficial; otherwise, it would be largely a waste of vour and my precious time
energy and reprehensible waste of taxpayers' money.

However, it has occurred to me that, if you are undecided as to sub¬
poenaing me, it might be a good plan to acquaint you now with the nature
ot my testimony; and I therefore submit below, in question and answer form
points of interest as I envision them and your requirements;

TESTIMONY ON EDMONDSON CRUSADE

The Truth? U t0 ^ ^ Truth ’ the Whoie Truth ’ and Nothing But

I do and will, if the Committee will let me.

What is your name, age and residence?

Robert Edward Edmondson, Stoddartsville, Penna. Born Dayton, Ohio,
1872; of pre-revolution Virginia ancestry; 40 years in politico-economic
journalism.

What is your present business?

Promoting patriotic power-publicity exposing the treasonable conspiracy
of the anti-national Jewish Politico-Economic System that is seeking to over-
throw The American System and substitute therefor the rabbi-proclaimed
thoroughly Socialized Democracy," which is Communistic.

1 4 7

How iong have you been circulating publications on that subject.

Since 1933-

How many have been distributed?

The Edmondson Associates have been instrumental in having printed, and
republished and circulated over five million, reaching more than 10,000,000
people, from coast to coast. I have no formal organization.

What is the source of the information published?

Books, pamphlets, testimony, legal documents and other suppressed publi¬
cations, including amazing Jewish confessions of asoirations and acts toward
world power—from England, France, Italy, Germany, Arabia, China, Siberia,
Sweden, South Africa, Australia, Canada, Japan, India, New' Zealand and the
United States.

What is the nature and object of your publicity?

Educational Jew-exposure, to liberate the Republic from Jewish domination.
Leaflets are designed to enlighten leadership, and fortify it with facts showing
that the solution of the Jewish Problem in America is economic—to be
achieved by ballots, not bullets.

Do not racial-religious constitutional guarantees prohibit anti-Jewish action
such as you are taking?

No. For ics own self-preservation the Constitution must obviously require
its citizen-supporters to defend it against enemies within, as well as without,
who prostitute the state endowments into license that imperils its own exis¬
tence as a constitutional state"--using the words of the U. S. Supreme Court
regarding Communistic subversions.

FEAR OF JEWISH BLACKMAIL

How many contributor-subscribers have you?

I do not know. By request, no regular record has been kept aside from
that essential to tax requirements. The patriotic service is a sort of chain-affair,
with contribution subscriptions irregular.

You say your leaflets are supplied at cost. What do you mean by that?

One cent is calculated to approximately cover labor, materials, supplies,
printing, transportation and such operation-expenses.

What is your salary?

None. Not even a "drawing account." Edmondson capital to the extent of
$20,000 has been sunk in this non-profit patriotic crusade to fill the gaps left
by unavoidable deficits. I have regarded it as a privilege to make such a gift
to my country.

Have you received any large contributions?

No. I do not recall any over $100; very few over $20. Most of them are
anonymous, and impossible to trace to source, except in the case of requests for
$1 to $5 literature-orders. Only volunteer contributions are acceptable. There
is no specific solicitation,

What have you to say regarding the report that Hitler-Nazi funds are
financing your campaign?

To the best of my knowledge and belief I have never received a dollar
contribution from such sources, directly or indirectly. Without hesitation, I
would gratefully accept any unconditional offering to preserve American liber¬
ties—whose preservation is worth any sacrifice.

3

(i

£

•t

£

1 4 8

Do you favor Nazism or Fascism for America?

Absolutely NO. I am an American Vigilante Patriot, not a German Nazi
Patriot, nor an Italian Fascist Patriot. My public and private record on this
point is unimpeachable. I have repeatedly proclaimed that I stand irrevocably
for traditional individualistic Americanism for America, as against collectivism,
regimentation or any other foreign ideology.

Why do you attack Jews in preference to Communism? .

Communism is an effect. The Jews cause Communism. They introduced
it to the world via Russia. Their leaders seek to Communize Gentiles. The
Jewish Plan does not contemplate Communism for Jews.

Jews call you an anti-Semite. Why?

JEWS HIDE BEHIND RACE AND RELIGION

Because they hide behind Race, just as they do behind Religion. Arabs
belong to the Semite race. If you are anti-Semitic you are anti-Arab as well as
anti-Jew. I am not against Arabs. They take the stand I do, viz.: Their National¬
ist Leader says: "We turn against the Jews, not because they are Jews (or
Semites), but because they threaten our existence."

Has your agency ever been investigated by the authorities?

Yes, by the Department of Justice and the Post Office.

With what result?

Both admitted that I was merely exercising my constitutional right of
Freedom of Press. My mail has never been denied transportation by the postal
authorities.

Has any attempt been made to stop your campaign otherwise?

Yes. A N. Y. City Jewish-majority Grand Jury, instigated by Je-wisb Mayor
LaGuardia, indicted me in 1936 on a charge of "libel of all persons of the
Jewish Religion,’’ everywhere, dead or alive, including themselves. The court
unconditionally dismissed the charge May 10, 1938, specifically declaring
that my work contained no incitement to breach of the peace. I have never
attacked the Jewish Religion as such in my Jew-Communist exposures, which
centered against politico-economic monopoly-power.

You claim that a Jewish Conspiracy is trying to destroy The Republic and
other nations. What is your authority?

The Record

Suppressed historical documents prove it. They show that Jewish revolu¬
tionaries wrecked Russia, and that the Soviets are now ruled by Kaganowitch-
Finkelstein-Litvinoff-Maisky Jews thru Gentile Front Stalin, wedded to a
Jewess. Confirmation is found in the writings of British Correspondent-Resi¬
dent-in-Russia Victor Marsden, who reported Lenin married a Jewess- British
Author Wickham Steed, of "Through Thirty Years;" New Zealand’Author
A. N. Field; English Editor-Author A, S. Leese. "The Moment," Jewish Soviet
publication, was quoted in a U. S. Jewish weekly as saying: "L. M. Kagano-
witch will one day rule over Russia. His sister is Stalin's wife.” The British
White Paper of April 1, 1919, reported: ' Bolshevism is organized and worked
by Jews.” The London Jewish Chronicle of April 4 , .1919, said: "The ideals of
Bolshevism are at many points consonant with the finest ideals of Judaism."
The American Hebrew of Sept. 10, 1920, said:” What Jewish idealism and
Jewish discontent have so powerfully contributed to produce in Russia, the
same historic qualities are tending to produce in other countries.” London
Jewish Savant Dr. Oscar Levy wrote in "The World Significance of the Rus¬
sian Revolution by Pitt-Rivers: "Jewish elements provide the driving power
for both Capitalism and Communism." Zionst Leader Herzl admits in "The

149

Jewish State" that: When we jews sink, we become a revolutionary proletariat;
when we rise, there arises also our terrible power of the purse. The American
Patriotic Coalition reported to Congress Dec. 29, 1934: The communist
movement in the U. S. is an alien conspiracy." It is treason.

Do you hold that Jews wrote "The Protocols of the learned Elders or

I am not concerned with such authenticity any more than I am concerned
with whether or not Benjamin Franklin actually delivered a prophetic denun¬
ciation of Jewry at the birth of The Republic. America is concerned with the
fact that JEWS have put into effect such "protocolic” edicts in Europe and the
U. S. The deadly parallel proves it. "Proof of prophecy lies tn fulfillment.’ _

Why do you object to Jewish championship of Democracy, -which kind ot
go\ eminent has been praised by leaders of both the great parties?

Because Democracy and Communism are synonymous; because this
countrv's government was founded on republican, not democracy principles,
"Democracy" does not appear either in the Declaration of Independence, nor
in the Constitution. It was apparently deleted because democracies have always
fallen to pieces in the past because their communistic forces automatically tend
to disintegrate.

Hitler says Jews want war. Do you believe that?

Jews Promote War

I do. The record shows it. Werner Sombart, in bis book: "Jews and
Modern Capitalism," holds: "Wars are Jews’ harvests;’ going on to say: 'They
became Lords of Money and Lords of the World." Henry Ford declared in the
N Y. World of Feb. 17, 1921: "I am convinced that nearly all wars were
caused so that some one would profit. Those who have profited were Inter¬
national Jews. They start wars by propaganda which set one people against
another. They profit before war by making munitions; during war, by loans;
afterward, in a free-for-all grab." Former British Propaganda Agent Landman,
a Jew, wrote in the London Jewish Chronicle of Feb. /, 1936; "The only way
to induce the American President to come into the World War was to secure
the co-operation of Zionist Jewry by promising them Palestine. The Zionists
carried out their part and helped bring America into the war.

Do you know that Henry Ford recanted all he said about the Jews?

Latest reports say his secretary "recanted” for him unauthorized.

What is your proposal for a solution of the Jewish Problem?

Disfranchisement of unassimilable Jews as a danger to the peace and
safety of the state; their removal from economic monopolies and monetary
domination; their purchase of the Island of Madagascar for a Jewish National
Homeland State; their deportation seif-paid.

Do you believe we Americans can return constitutionally to traditional
government?

I do. Enlightenment only is necessary. Once they know' the trouble,
citizens will remedy it "American-way." No dictatorship is needed. America
wants no communism, no fascism, no nazism, no bolshevism, no democracy, in
my opinion. Individualistic Americanism demands the restoration of The
Republic with its principles of special privilege for none and justice for all,
no more, no less. There ought to be financial avalanche support for such a
tescue and restoration, reconstruction and redemption.

Yours, pro patria.

1 5 0

A GENUINE MODERN "PROTOCOL’' FROM A JEWISH "ELDER - ’

The following self-explanatory communication has just been received
(April 17, 193-9) from English Editor Arnold S. Leese (the British Patriot
whom the Jews of England imprisoned for six months recently because he
publicly exposed the anti-British activities of World Jewry—and later interned
five years without formal charges).

"Dear Mr. Edmondson: In view of the immense importance of a speech
made by the Jewish Poet Bialik in Palestine in 1933, and which is so little
known, I have obtained the only six copies remaining of the report of this
speech in a diocesan magazine of Jerusalem. I have kept one for myself, and
am sending rhe others to five of the most genuine movements against the
Jew of which I know; so that full use of Bialik's confession may be made. I have
pleasure in sending one to you herewith. Bialik is now dead. His brother-in-
law was Gamarnik, a Soviet Army General.”

The name of this monthly magazine is "Lines of Communication,” and on
the title page appears: "A Diocesan Magazine of the Anglican Church in
Jerusalem and Throughout the Holy Land, Transjordan, Syria and Cyprus:
Editor, Archdeacon Stewart, St. George’s Close, Jerusalem.”

The tide of the article in the July, 1933, number, is "Judaism in History—
A Jewish Conception," with an introduction reading: "From an address
delivered at the Hebrew University, Jerusalem, on May 11, this year, by Mr.
N. H. Bialik, the most famous of modern Hebrew poets.”

The matter below is taken from the Bialik address, and constitutes prob¬
ably the most amazing ''official" confession ever published from high Jewish
"religious” leadership:

To War on Gentiles

"Judaism, which was destroyed politically (as a result of the destruction
of the Temple 70 A.D.), went forth into the great world. It adapted its
possessions to its wanderings. I once compared it to AN ARMY GOING TO
WAR—a 'movable State.’

"Jews were compelled to smuggle their goods across from frontier to
frontier; so they chose abstract wares, easy to smuggle; and this gave them
ability, despite ghettoes and restrictions, TO ENTER EVERYWHERE; and
so it is that the Hebrew people have PENETRATED EVERYWHERE.

"The argument is that Judaism, by penetrating among the Gentiles (in
its Christian guise or otherwise), has gradually undermined the remnants of
paganism. Such penetration has NOT been without DELIBERATE JEWISH
CONNIVING in the shape of assistance bestowed in a thousand ways, devices
and disguises. IT HAS BEEN EFFECTED IN GREAT MEASURE BY
CRYPTO-JEWS (Secret Jews), WHO HAVE PERMEATED CHRISTI¬
ANITY AND SPOKEN THROUGH THE MOUTH OF CHRISTIANITY.

"By these devices, through Jewish will and through the power of their
Jewish blood (I, too, like Hitler, believe in blood and the power of blood) ;
and owing to an instinct for ’requital,’ they have gradually induced Christianity
to shed what was left in it of pagan elements; and it is they who, in principle
(even though they are called by great Gentile names), are the creators of the
Renaissance, of Liberalism, of Democracy, of Socialism, and of COMMUNISM.

"All this achievement * * * has come about chiefly through unknown and
anonymous Jews, Jews in secret, either crypto-Jews who mingled among the
Gentiles and nurtured great thinkers from among them; or, through the

1 5 1

influence of Jews, who, in the great crises of liberty and freedom, have stood
behind the scenes; or through Jewish teachers and scholars from the time of
the Middle Ages. It was disciples of Jewish teachers who headed the Protestant
movements.

Calls Gentiles "These Dogs"

"THESE DOGS, these haters of Israel, have a keen nose. In truth, Jewish
influence in Germany is powerful. It is impossible to ignore it, MARX WAS
A JEW. His manner of thought was Jewish. His keeness of intellect was
Jewish; and one of his forbears was a most distinguished rabbi endowed with
a powerful mind.

"The newspapers, UNDER JEWISH CONTROL, obviously served as an
auxiliary in all movements in favor of freedom. Not in vain have Jews been
drawn toward journalism. In their hands IT BECAME A WEAPON HIGHLY
FITTED TO MEET THEIR NEEDS.

"The Gentiles have at last realized this secret—that Judaism has gradually-
penetrated and permeated them LIKE A DRUG. The Gentile nature is in
revolt, and is trying to organize the final battle. Paganism is minded to
organize its last war against Judaism. And there is no doubt that this warfare
* * * is being waged specifically against Democracy, against Socialism. This
is another worldwide warfare against the forces of Judaism. I venture to think
that Socialism in its highest form is the fruit of the Jewish spirit, and the fruit
of the world outlook of the prophets. It is they who were the first Socialists.

War is now being waged against us, against Judaism—not in OUR OWN
LAND but in the great outer world where we are scattered. They would
'smoke us out’ of all the cracks and crannies WHERE WE HAVE HIDDEN.
They would exterminate us like BACILLI, and be rid of us."

To any but dosed minds, comment is superfluous. But to ignore the warn¬
ing ''protocol" of "an army going out to war’’ on Gentiles in the guise of
secret spies, under the Oriental banner of diabolical duplicity, would be to
commit suicide in the shadow of TOWERING ARROGANCE*.

BANKRUPTING LIBEL SUITS

The following was printed in The Jewish Spectator of April, 1939, by
Rabbi Samuel Horowitz:

"One reason for the failure to silence Father Coughlin is the resigned
feeling of helplessness and futility on the part of Jewish leaders. They fail to
see the difference between free speech and libel. Coughlin is a dangerous
demagague and vicious wolf in sheep’s clothing.

"There is no way of keeping him off the radio directly. And we cannot
expect his hierarchy to unfrock him, because, as an individual citizen, he has
a right to free speech. There is only one effective and legal means of SILENC¬
ING him—to sue him for libel,

"When a demagogue repeats his slanderous lies and ignores the truth,
he is guilty of deliberate libel. Hence, all who have been libeled by him have
a perfect right to sue him for libel. Thus, suing for libel for millions of
dollars, ENOUGH TO CAUSE BANKRUPTCY, would prove the most ef¬
fective means of SILENCING Jew-baiters.”

Is this a thoughtless exposure of synagogue "morals?” Of the materialistic
philosophy of rabbinical Jewry?

Here is an alleged Jewish "Man of God” proposing to suppress the free
speech of a Christian "Man of God” before he is proven guilty in a court of
law of misrepresentation.

1 5 2

Perhaps some light on this significant development will be cast by reference
to "The Reflex,’ Jewish Magainze, November 1927, wherein, it was stated:
"The modern American rabbi is a man of the world. He knows and cherishes
the power of money, and is adept in matter of finance, mortgages and loans.”

If the foregoing does not picture MATERIALISM PERSONIFIED—
what does it exemplify?

"Truth Seeks LIGHT"—nor SILENCE and Darkness!

Americans! BE YOURSELVES! Don’t be a Jew-worm! Yon are NINETY
TO ONE! Of WHAT are you afraid?

STAND UP—AND FIGHT! "All for one and one for all!”

REV. STANLEY HIGH A BIASED REPORTER
(Edmondson Bulletin of June, 1939)

Faint Hearts in the patriotic defense-war against Jewish communiziny
ought to take courage from the first article of the Saturday Evening Po? :
May 27, 1939, entitled "Star Spangled Fascists," by Rev. Stanley High- .
is listed in the Red Network as a proponent of the "intermixing of races.''

While the article smearingiy insinuates that current patriotism in Arm.-i:- .
is chiefly of the Nazi-Fascist type, force of circumstances compels the admission
that "the movement is prospering" to the point where "The Leader" will find
"something to lead.”

An estimate is reported that a third of"all the families in America are
receiving propaganda licerature "of this sort”—which suggests chat more than
forty million Americans are becoming Jewconscious—going on to say that
private and public patriotic meetings approach "astronomical figures."

"There are a number of important organizations" says High, which are
dedicated exclusively to research, information and interpretation.” He brands
them the Fascist Brain Trust, "Prominent in this," he notes, "is Robert Edward
Edmondson, who publishes American Vigilante bulletins; and, after a 1936
indictment for his attacks on the Jews, keeps out of reach of reporters."

High lies when he says Edmondson has kept out of reach of reporters.

You, Mr. High, have my address, printed on millions of Jew-exposure
bulletins. You know where I am located.

Had I, as an American fairplay journalist, been writing the Post article, I
would have added to "after a 1936 indictmenc for his attacks on the Jew's,"
the fact that on May 10, 1938, the court unconditionally dismissed the case
"in furtherance of justice," because the defendant had been merely exercising
his Constitutional right of Freedom of the Press.

Instead of being forced out of New York, as rumored in some quarters.
I would have added that the defendant, after waiting four months following
said dismissal, to give the Jews more opportunity for further official attack,
surrendered his apartment and, to enable his wife and himself to recuperate,
moved to the quiet of the Pocono Mountains in Stoddartsville, Pa., where, as
pledged in his May 12, 1938, pamphlet entitled "Court Dismissal Follows.
Jewish Backdown," he has continued to conduct his "Free Speech educational
publicity against the International Jewish System that is communizing The
Republic."

153

Had I wanted dramatic "atmosphere” for my story I would have quoted
Dublidv a year ago about that dismissal, viz..

Ei" *»rf™. 1 «.TUSH 5

eVer r n S d ed had I as an American reporter, been searching for more "human
interest” I would have discovered that at no trme was the Defendant Edmond-

t tf tVd^o 0 ^ i r srf sr&. *« l

behev n ed a that Truth would win through Power-Publiafy exposmg the taw-
wealtness High makes it very plain. There is NOW "something

to lead!”

''Back to The Republic!”

HOW U. S. LABOR IS BOSSED
(Edmondson Bulletin of June 2, 1939)

American labor: Purge Your Ranks! Be AMERICAN! You^under
FOREIGN rule! Investigate your controls. The} P

nRS Et us start right 1 The undersigned has no ’’racket: He is an American
patriJfseekinglhe lestoraticn of Thf Republic. He is not a wealthy capitalist.
He is against the Jewish capitalistic sweat-shop system.

Matthew Wo1 (foreign born), is Jewish Vice-President o the American
Federation of Labor in charge of its Legal Bureau, which ™P»pasG»m
rnnnse Toseoh A Padway Wisconsin Jew. whom the Jews Who s Who lists
"gn tan also. Wotl is said to be an Episeopahan but so is Jewish Mayor
as ujicigu wish Prof. Albert Einstein says: Ihe Jew

who U a a bidons his Taith REMAINS A JEW (CoUiers' Weekly U-kb-38).

For the C. I. O. Labor Group Jewish Lawyer Lee Pressman « Genera
Counsel The Jewish B'nai B'rith Messenger of Los Angeles (3-12-37) narn
Tewish Philanthropist Maurice Falk of Pittsburgh as the des.gner of the
C I O CIO Jewish Leader Sidney Hillman is Pres.dent of the Amalgamated
ciothing Worker Union, and has had the support of Dav.d Dubinsky-of the
International Garment Workers, and Max Zarltsky of the Hat-Cap Union

all foreign born. , .

"President Arthur A Wharton of the International Assn, ot Machinists,
wrote! omuTat feSr to his offtcais attack,ng the 'CIO JEWISH organizations
with their red affiliates’” (Daily Worker 5-25-37).

The N. Y. Times of Aug. 14,1938, printed this Washington dispatch,
"lohn P Frey, vice-President, American Federation of labor (who is credited
Jith being the real AFL power), told the Special House Committee instigat¬
ing un-American activities today that Communists hold key-positions m the

CIO. He listed 280 alleged Communists as holding such position.' He also
declared the program of the CIO had the hearty endorsemen. of the
Communist Party."

American Labor Party Key-Jewed

The American Labor Parry executive committee of 50 include mostly
Jewish names.

Jewish President David Lasser of The Workers Alliance is assisted by
Benjamin and other Jewish officials.

"The Comprodaily Publishing Co. (Publisher of the Communor Party
Official Organ, "The Daily Worker") was incorporated April IS, 1929 , with
J. Louis ENGDAHL, Irving FRANKLIN and Alexander TRACHTENBERG
as directors, and Isaac SCHORR, Carol WEISS KING and Fay SIEGARTEL,
as incorporators and stockholders."—From the N. Y. Times, Feb. 2, 1939.
Mike GOLD is chief columnist.

Isador Lubin is the American Delegate to the International Labor Bureau
of the League of Nations, and in his Labor Department at Washington appear
many key Jews, including, as consultants, Charles E. Wyzanski, Jr., Jacob
Perlman, Rose Schneidermann.

The National Labor Relations Board includes, among others, the foreign-
born key-Jews David J. Saposs and Wm. M. Leiserson. Abe Fortas is Jewish
General Counsel of the great PWA.

After an exhaustive investigation President E. H. Martin of the National
Reform Assn., reported: "Above 909c of the Motion Picture Industry's big
barons are JEWS—in fact they themselves claim 959c, and boast of it." Jew
names dominate the directorates of the corporations.

Politically, the Brooklyn Jewish Examiner of Oct. 20, 1933, has this to
say: "The Roosevelt Adminstration has selected more Jews co fill influential
positions than any previous administration in American history''—calling
Bernard M. Baruch "Unofficial President;" saying Frankfurter has great
power; naming Judge Saumel I. Rosenman as "Roosevelt's Right Arm;" Ex-
Justice Brandeis was regarded as "Father of the New Deal,”

Be Warned, American Labor!

A NEW HELL

(From Edmondson Bulletin of June 6, 1939)

Responding to repeated requests, the undersigned below reproduces the
salient features of London Jewish Savant Dr. Oscar Levy's awful tribal con¬
fession of guilt, as contained in his prefatory letter dated July, 1920, printed
in "The World Significance of the Russian Revolution," by Pitt-Rivers (in
New York Public Library):

"W'hen you first handed me your MS. on 'The World Significance of
The Russian Revolution,' you expressed a doubt about the propriety of its title.
After a perusal of your work, I can assure you that your misgivings were
entirely without foundation. No better title could have been chosen, for no
event in any age will finally have more significance for our world than this one.

"The Bolshevist simply did what his father, Mr. Democrat, never dared to
do. Hence, the latter's vacillation, hypocrisy and failure; hence, the former's
energy, sincerity and success. 'No movement,’ you rightly say about the Whitt
Opposition, representing a heterogeneous jumble of contradictory elements,
can ever defeat another movement which knows its own mind and allows of
no compromise.’

155

''Bolshevism is a religion and a faith. How could these half-converted
believers ever dream to vanquish the truthful and the faithful of their own
creed, those holy crusaders who had gathered round the red standard of the
Prophet Karl Marx; and who fought under the daring guidance of these
experienced officers of all latter-day revolutions—THE JEWS?

"I am touching here on a subject which, to judge from your own pamphlet,
is perhaps more interesting to you than any other. In this you are right. There
is no race in the world more enigmatic, more fatal than the Jews. The question
of the Jews and their influence on the world past and present, cuts to the root
of all things, and should be discussed by every hones; thinker. Jew's are very
suspicious of any Gentile who tries to approach them with a critical mind.

Jews Control Capitalism Communism

"You point out, with fine indignation, the great danger that springs from
the prevalence of Jews in finance and industry, and from the preponderance
of Jews in rebellion and revolution. You reveal the connection between the
collectivism of the immensely rich International Finance—and the International-
Collectivism of Karl Marx and Trotsky—the Democracy of and by decoy-cries.
And all this evil and misery, the economic as well as the political, you trace
back to one source-—THE JEWS.

Now, other Jews may villify and crucify you for these outspoken view's.
I myself shall abstain from joining the chorus of condemnation. First of all
I have to say this: There is scarcely an event in modern Europe that cannot be
traced back to the Jew's. Take the Great War that appears to have come to an
end. Ask yourself what were its causes and reasons.

Are Jews not the inventors of the Chosen People Myth? And is not this
obsession part and parcel of the political credo of every modern nation?

"All latter-day ideas and movements have originally sprung from a Jewish
source for the simple reason that the Semitic idea has finally conquered—
CONQUERED THROUGH CHRISTIANITY, which, as Disraeli pointed out
long ago, is nothing but 'Judaism for the people.’

"Now, Democracy pretends to proclaim everybody free and equal. It
was therefore bound to destroy the bond between master and servant; and
it replaced it by the bond of wages and salaries. Democracy, as we all know,
abolished slavery—that natural slavery in which the master took an interest in
his slaves because they were part of his most valuable property. But it reintro¬
duced it in the form of wage typranny—by means of which the 'freed' serf
could be freely exploited. Thus ended this glorious liberty principle of the
reformation and the revolution—the finest theory that has even been invented
for the most miserable of practices that have ever defiled this world. No doubt
the Jews are responsible for this, because they are the spiritual fathers of
Democracy.

Jews Victims of Their Own Practices

"No, you are not a vulgar—you are a very enlightened critic of our race.
For there is an anti-Semitism which does the Jews more justice than any blind
philo-Semitism, than does that merely sentimental 'let-them-all-come Liberal¬
ism,” which in itself is nothing but the Semitic Ideology over again.

"You have noticed with alarm that the Jewish elements provide the driving
forces for both Communism and Capitalism, for the material as well as the
spiritual ruin of this world. From Moses to Marx, in practice and in theory, in
idealism and in materialism, in philosophy and in politics, they axe today just
what they have always been—passionately devoted to their aims and purposes.

156

“ 'But these visions are all wrong’ you will reply. 'Look where they have
led the world. Think, have they not had a fair trial of 300 years. How much
longer are you going to recommend them to us, and inflict them upon us?

"To this question I have only one answer. It is this: 'YOU ARE RIGHT!’
This reproach is only too well justified, and upon this common ground I am
quite willing to shake hands with you, and defend you against any accusation of
promoting race hatred.

"If you are an Anti-Semite, I, the Semite, am an Anti-Semite too, and a
much more fervent one than ever you are. We have erred, my friend, we have
grievously erred.

Jews The World’s Executioners

"We, who have posed as the saviours of the world; we, who have even
boasted of having given it 'the Saviour’—we are today nothing else but the
world’s seducers, its destroyers, its incendiaries, its executioners. We, who have
promised to lead you to a New Heaven, we have finally succeeded in landing
you into a New Hell.

"There has been no progress, least of all moral progress. And it is just
our morality which has prohibited ail real progress. 1 look at this world and
I shudder at its ghastliness—I shudder all the more, as I know the spiritual
authors of all this ghastliness.

"There is hope, my friend, for we are still here; our last word is not yet
spoken; our last deed is not yet done; our last revolution is not yet made. This
last revolution, the revolution that will crown our revolutionary work, will be
the revolution against the revolutionaries. It is bound to come.

"And when that great day has broken, when the values of Death and
Decay are put into the melting-pot to be changed into those of Power and
Beauty, then you, my dear Pitt-Rivers, the descendant of an old and dis¬
tinguished Gentile family, may be assured to find by your side, and as our
faithful ally, at least one member of that Jewish Race w-hich has fought with
fatal success upon all the spiritual battlefields.

"Yours against the revolution, and for life ever flourishing,

(signed) OSCAR LEVY

July, 1920
London, England

Down the corridor of history has never come a greater confession of guilt,
a more powerful Jeremiad, a more impressive document, a more convincing
testament. For it. Levy was exiled from his home by his tribe.

CHRISTIAN CENTURY "ALL WET”

Open Letter of July 6, 1939, To Charles Clayton Morrison
Editor, Christian Century, Chicago

"Two months ago, one of the most notorious Jew-baiters in the United
States, Robert Edward Edmondson, published a bulletin entitled 'Hail Moseley.’
Edmondson is the man who, under the guise of running an investors service
with a New York address, covered the country with such scurrilous attacks on
the Jews that Mayor LaGuardia stepped in to bring him to trial for slander.
Only the plea of Jewish organizations induced the Mayor to drop the case.
Edmondson now operates from a Pennsylvania base. The most dangerous ele¬
ment in the Moseley campaign is its Anti-Semitism. * * * Gen. Moseley should

1 5 7

be court-martialed and disciplined. ‘ (Editorial from The CHRISTIAN Century
of Chicago, a weekly self-described as "undenominational,'’ June l4, 1939,

issue.) ,, .. ...

My attention has been directed to (presumably) your entanglmg-alhance

editorial comment emoted above, first by Rev. Harold W. Wager, Minister
First Methodist Church of Pierre, S. D„ in a letter of June 14, 1939, wherein
he remarked: "Read the article in the June 14, 1939, issue of The Christian
Century, and you will discover what thinking people think of you. * * *
Repent before it is too late,"

Rev Wager concludes his diatribe with a rather cryptic and amusing
.postscript, reading: "I think it would be wise for you to trace back your
Family Tree for several centuries to make sure there are no Jews to be found.

I haven't yet informed the reverend gentlemen that my genealogy reportedly
goes back to "Robert of Scotland" in the Eighth Century. If he was a Jew, then
I'm a Chinaman.

But, let’s get on with this matter, and reproduce, secondly, what Dr.
William’ H. Anderson, General Secretary of the American Christian Alliance,
N. Y.- City, has to say in his letter to you of June 16 —he having sent me a
copy:

The Christian Century "Wholly Wet

"I strongly suspect that you do not relish a showing that you are wrong in your facts
1 ) 1 - mistaken in your judgment * * * respecting the Moseley editorial m June 14
Christian Century.

"Mv understanding and belief is that much of Mr Edmondson’s material is made
up of quotations from Jewish sources. He insists emphatically that he is not opposed to
the lews, or any jew, for any religious or racial reason; but opposes subversive activities
by Jewish Internationalism. I have become fairly well acquainted with him. and I havc-
a very high opinion of his intelligence, and implicit confidence in his integrity and

sincerity.

"You are badly mixed and your information is pathetically fragmentary. The truth
of the matter is that the Edmondson Case bade fair to become one of the most notable,
if not the outstanding case involving Freedom of Speech in the history of this country,
if not in the world; for it was unquestionably intended to convict and imprison Mr,
Edmondson, with the help of a packed jury, after finally indicting him by action of a
Grand Jury composed of a majority of Jews.

"The truth is that Mr. LaGuardia did the practically unprecedented thing as Mayor
of New York of issuing his own warrant as Chief Magistrate.' for the arrest of Mr.
Edmondscm-a cheap, dirty political trick to clinch the Jewish vote for his re-election.
And 1 said that much in writing to Mr. LaGuardia, who knows me very well.

"You are wholly 'wet' in your statement: 'Only the plea of Jewish organizations
induced the Mayor to drop the case.' The case had passed enurely out of Mayor La-
Guardia’s hands long before it was even decided to drop it. II GO 1 lOO HOI 1U
HANDLE.

"Mr. Edmondson fortunately had a modest competence, enough to defend lumself.
One of the things done which caused 'wailing and gnashing of teeth m Zion was to
subpoena about 25 leading Jews, to be put on the stand for the defense, and confront
them with certain things. After that, the plan Co railroad Mr. Edmondson cooled otf.

"Jewish organizations intervened as 'friends of the court and set out what Mr.
LaGuardia must have known, vi/., that there is under American law no such a thing
-s racial libel They set out that the net result would react against the Jews. And that
is a monumental understatement, for this case would have gone to the U. S. Supreme
Court'and SET THE COUNTRYSIDE ON FIRE."

Case Unconditionally Dismissed

I of course do not know how you "took" Dr. Anderson’s truthful account;
but I will add that the case was unconditionally dismissed May 10, 1938, "m
furtherance of justice," the official decision of which added the publications
of the defendant had "never caused a breach of the peace in the community
nor are they apt to.”

1 5 8

Dr. Anderson is entirely correct in informing you that my removal from
New York to Pennsylvania was dictated by the necessity for health-recuperation
on the part of my wife, as well as myself, following a two-year court strain,
pro patria; and I am carrying out my pledge made at the time of dismissal,
viz.: "The defendant will continue his Free Speech educational publicity, NOT
against any religion or race, but against the International Jewish Socialism that
is Communizing The Republic—for only The Truth can set us free.”

I am given to understand that The Chrisitian Century is one of "the most
LIBERAL of the Protestant organizations.” In respect to my own case, judging
from the editorial quoted at the beginning of this bulletin, it has—not to use
the short and ugly word—"liberalized” The Truth in a most amazing un-
Christian manner. Did you know that Ludwig Lewisohn, leading Jewish
author, in his new book "The Answer,” says "THE JEWS ORIGINATED
Liberalism?" Don’t you know that your epithet "scurrilous” is a typical product
of the Jewish Master Factory? And I am "Anti-Jew,” not "Anti-Semitic.”

I want none of that liberal brand of so-called Christian Chanty—which re¬
calls the historic words of Martin Luther, greatest Protestant—also the most
prominent 'anti-Semite’ of his time—when he proclaimed that "Were God
willing to give me no ocher Messiah than he whom the Jews desire, I would
rather be a sow r than a man."

You attacked the Jewish Religion AS SUCH—which I never did, for I
concentrated on Jewry's politico-economic communizing—in your issue of
Dec. I, 1937, when you exclaimed, anti-Jewishly:

"Judaism rests upon an IMPOSSIBLE BASIS. It tries to pluck the fruits
of democracy WITHOUT YIELDING ITSELF to the processes of democracy.
Democracy cannot guarantee our Jewish brethren against the emergency of A
CRISIS in which prejudice and anger generated by THEIR LONG RESIS¬
TANCE to the democratic processes, may flame up to their great hurt. The
situation in which the jewish Problem rises is in large measure of JEWRY'S
OWN CREATION. The root cause is the Jew's immemorial and pertinacious
OBSESSION WITH AN ILLUSION that his race and people are rhe object
of the special favor of God, who requires the maintenance of their racial
integrity and separateness. Their idea of an integral race HAS ITS PROTO¬
TYPE IN NAZISM.”

And then you yoked yourself "with unbelievers,” in your pro-Jew de¬
nunciation of my patriotic devotion to our Christian Republic, made to the
Court in the LaGuardia Case, wherein you listed me as "The No. 1 Anti-
Semite of America,” and hypocritically prated of my "intemperance" and "wild
defamations. What a "beam” the Christian Century must have in its own eye,
considering the quotations above and below.

After reading your editorial of Dec. 1 and the following anti-Jew com¬
ment in the Christian Century issues of April 29 and May 13, 1936, I have
decided to resign in your favor the title "Anti-Semite No, l!” I quote:

"Mutual” Tolerance Plea Exposed

"Jewry is a mutual benefit organization. It is also a propagandist organi¬
zation. There can be no unity and no social health in the American community
so long as any group invokes the holy sanctions of religion and the inviolable
solidarity of nationa life, in perpetuation of irreconcilable factionalism.

"The tension between Jews and Christians cannot be effectively resolved
by an appeal to the sentiment of mutual tolerance. In a problem of this kind,
tolerance operates in a one-way street. It is exercised by the majority, not by
the minority. It is putting a mask on the truth to describe this sort of tolerance
as 'mutual.'

159

"American society is an organism, and, as such, all its vital forces tend
toward solidarity, unity, integration. Any unassimilabie element of the popula¬
tion is bound to have trouble, because it’s bound to make trouble.

"Let it be known that the Jewish Community holds its religion in such a
manner that it neither desires to spread its characteristic ideals beyond those of
its own blood, nor consents to expose itself to those normal cultural contacts
which involve the exchange of spiritual goods—let this be known, and you
have dried up the Fountain of Tolerance in the Christian Community. The
Jew will never command the respect of the non-Jew’ish culture in which he
lives so long as he huddles by himself, nursing his own 'uniqueness.' A
Judaism which talks of its uniqueness and is unwilling to take ‘pot-luck’ with
humanity by offering its treasures to the rest of mankind, cannot escape the
suspicion that it is hoarding its treasures for a selfish purpose."

"Dangerous Anti-Semitism’’—for Jewry—and I endorse every word of
your profound philiipic. But, it’s a wonder the Jews haven’t sued the Christian
Century for "libel of and concerning the Jewish Religion," in order to "court
martial and discipline’’ and suppress it. The only reason I can think of is that
maybe the indictment is true, and therefore the Jews know it is not action¬
able.'

Your defamatory misrepresentations in my own case are actionable at law,
in my opinion.

In passing, it may be remarked that the Christian Century has finally put
itself in the same patriot-smear class as the Communistic New Masses, "Look”
and "Life" and the Jewish-advertising dominated Saturday Evening Post’s
"Star-Spangled Fascist" lies of Rev. Stanley High.

Editor Morrison, take a friendly fraternal tip from a veteran journalist—
warn the Protestant Churches to de-judaize themselves before it is too late, and
purge the Religion of Christ of "Sens of the Devil" (John 8:44).

GOLDEN SPIDER WEB FOR GENTILES
(Following is an Edmondson Publication of July 10, 1939:)

Following are the five points of Jewry’s Palestine Kahal-PIan for World
Hegemony.

(1) Wherever thev live, in organized groups, the Jews are A PEOPLE
and A NATIONALITY.'

(2) Judaism is not merely a faith, a cult, a religion, in the Christian
significance of these terms, but A CIVILIZATION, a culture unique in its
ethical and social emphasis.

(3) The spirit of the New Age in which we live is the Spirit of SCIENCE,
progress and freedom. The entire Jewish Heritage must be re-evaluated in
terms of THIS spirit.

(4) Make the Jews A NATION IN THE POLITICAL AND ECON¬
OMIC SENSE IN PALESTINE, even as they are A NATIONALITY EVERY¬
WHERE OUTSIDE OF PALESTINE. This was the CENTRAL point of
the program.

1 6 0

(5) This Jewish Homeland in Palestine is to be LINKED wich ORGAN¬
IZED autonomous Jewish Centers the world over.

The foregoing outline is from Rabbi Barnett Brickner’s analysis in the
Herzl Symposium Memorial published in 1929 by Meyer W. Weisgal, New
York. Rabbi Brickner interprets thus:

"By Nationalism and Nationality WE mean, not a political but a cultural
concept. STATES exist whenever government controls nationalities for its own
purposes. Jewish Nationalism does not divide the loyalty of the Jew; it seeks
to release the spiritual potentialities latent in the Jewish heritage."

On this point the American Zionist pre-eminent leader Jacob Schiff, wrote
Aug. 8, 1907, to President Solomon Schechter of the Jewish Theological Semin¬
ary: "I cannot for a moment concede that one can be at the same time a true
American and an honest adherent of the Zionist (Herzl) movement.’'

Jewish Lawyer Bernard L Brown writes in his book: "From Pharaoh to
Hitler"—

"In law and in reason, there cannot be a division of nationality in any
country without endangering the welfare of the Nation. To say that Jews are
'a religious minority' completely destroys their claim to minority group recogni¬
tion in any country.”

Rabbi’s World Rule Plan

Rabbi Abba Hillel Silver’s contribution to the Herzl Symposium includes
this startling allusion to Palestine—"FROM WHICH VANTAGE POINT
ISRAEL COULD MOVE THE WORLD."

"With the signing in London on Tuesday of the Dead Sea Concession,
there was achieved what is the most remarkable effort ever undertaken by any
group of American Zionists. The victory, which assures JEWISH DOMINA¬
TION in the management and direction of the Dead Sea, belongs to what is
known as the Marks-Brandeis group."—N. Y. Jewish Daily Bulletin, March 24,
1929.

Moses Mendelsohn materialistically declared: "Judaism is NOT a religion,
but revealed LEGISLATION," as quoted in "The History of the Jews" by
Historian Graetz. The London Jewish Chronicle of August 13 , 1937, confirm-
ingly printed: "Judaism is essentially a 'religion’ of LAW.”

A Jewish state in Palestine would not be "a religious homeland," as alleged,
hut A POLITICAL move to establish a power-center with which the Jewish High
Command could dominate the world through its "ORGANIZED MINORITY
NATIONALITIES” placed in kev-control positions of Gentile Nations as
"Kahals.”

In other words, Jewish Nationalism, directed by the Jewish State strategi¬
cally located at the Gateway between the East and the West, would be used to
communistically break down and internationalize Gentile countries via local
"nationality" ("Fifth Columns") representatives of the Jerusalem Super-
Government.

Rabbi Brickner significantly says: "Jewish Socialist-Zionists founded their
movement because their aim is to see Palestine reconstructed on the Socialist
Principles of KARL MARX and the Hebrew’ Prophets. In Palestine today most
of the Jewish workers are members of this faction—one finds numerous colonies
in which people live and work on a Communistic basis."

161

The Plan of the Plot for Jewish World Domination is vividly set forth in
the quotation below from "The Key to the Mystery.”

"Following is a boast written in 1918 by the Jew Louis Levy, edited by
Nytnordisk Fortag, Copenhagen, as recited by the Jewish actor Samuel Besekow
in a meeting of the Keren Hayesod in December, 1935; according to the
Berlingske Tidende of December 9, 1935:

" 'Who does not know what the glands in the human body represent? 1 In
the modern community of nations, THE JEWS HAVE SETTLED ON THE
GLANDS—Exchanges, Banks, Ministries, Newspapers, Publishing, Insurance,
Hospitals, Peace Palaces, etc.

" 'JERUSALEM WILL BE AS A BUSY SPIDER IN A WEB WHOSE
THREADS OF ELECTRICITY AND GOLD GLISTEN ALL OVER THE
WORLD. THE CENTER OF THIS GOLDEN WEB, TO WHICH ALL
THREADS RUN, IS JERUSALEM.”

DISABLED VETERANS KOSHER-FOOLED

Open Letter of July 15, 1939, to Roy P. Monahan, Chairman, National
Americanism Committee of Disabled Veterans of The World War.

I have before me a poster-sheet 17 x 22 inches, with PROPAGANDA
KIT” and a "Nazi Octopus” emblazoned thereon in letters of RED, which
includes a dateless letter signed with your name, attacking American patriots.

Under a side-caption appears the following: Robert Edw'ard Edmondson
in an interview stated that he had issued five million pamphlets. He was in¬
dicted for issuing LIBELOUS pamphlets on complaint of Mayor LaGuardia.

In another expensively-printed communication entitled "Report of Pro¬
gress " prepared by the National Americanism Committee of the Disabled
Veterans of the World War, dated June 7, 1939, 49 WALL St., N. Y. City (by
which I locate you), the following statement is made over your name, referring
to: "vicious, scurrilous, lying propaganda, issued by Robert Edward Edmondson.
Anybody ‘who reads the Propaganda Kit could read about Mr. Edmondson and
his other publication, published from Glendale, Calif., called the Christian
Free Press; the contents of which indicate that Mr. Edmondson and his publi¬
cations are a part of propaganda coming into this country from Erfurt, Germany.
Let us consider how well Mr. Edmondson has learned his lesson from the
master-propagandist, Hitler,"

Six Lies Exposed

LIE NO. 1: "In a interview Mr. Edmondson stated he had issued five
million pamphlets.” The only interview ever authorized by me was June 9,
1936, at the time of the indictment you refer to, including this statement; "It
is estimated that we have been instrumental in having printed, reproduced and
circulated more than 5,000,000 circulars.” The pronoun "we” refers to Edmond¬
son and patriotic associates. For your information the total to date is estimated
to have reached over ten million Americans.

LIE NO. 2: "He was indicted for issuing LIBELOUS pamphlets, on com¬
plaint of Mayor LaGuardia." As the indictment was unconditionally DISMISSED
May 10, 1938, said pamphlets were not found "libelous,” as you falsely alleged;
there being no group libel law covering the charge of "libel of all persons of
the Jewish Religion"—which was not atcacked per se by the defendant.

162

LIE NO. 3: "His slander included Dean Gildersleeve and Frances Perkins. 1 '
The last paragraph of the court's decision dismissing all allegations against me.
reads this way: "And the court, on its own motion AND IN FURTHERANCE
OF JUSTICE, dismisses indictments which charge libel against Frances Perkins
and Virginia C. Gildersleeve, AS THESE INDICTMENTS ON THEIR FACE
DO NOT SET FORTH A CRIME."

My "Slander?" Careful, Mr. Monahan.

LIE NO. 4: "A piece of vicious, scurrilous, lying propaganda issued by
Edmondson." As the court decision passed on my power-publicity and dismissed
the charge against me, how could it be composed of "vicious lies?" That may
be actionable!

LIE NO. 5: "Anybody who read the Propaganda Kit distributed by the
Committee, could read about Mr. Edmondson and his other publication—the
Christian Free Press."

The Christian Free Press of California is edited and operated, according to
my information, by Mrs. Leslie Fry, author of the famous documented work
"Waters Flowing Eastward."

LIE NO. 6: "Edmondson publications are a part of the propaganda coming
from Germany." You then attempt to show, by quoting from "Mein Kampf"—
'how well Edmondson has learned his lesson from Hitler,’’ and falsely put the
Nazi brand on my patriotic work for America—another typical JEW-Trick.

April 23, 1934, replying co a letter from President D. A. Brown of the
American Hebrew, I wrote:

"Being PRO-American, I am ANTI-Fascist, Anti-Communist, Anti-Socialist.
We want AMERICANISM FOR THE U. S." I have never received a dollar
from Adolph Hitler, directly or indirectly, to the best of my knowledge. So
much for YOUR Jewish-innuendo that 1 am a Nazi agent.

As I have always maintained that "For our disabled veterans the best is not
good enough," it will be a pleasure to circulate this factual open letter among
your membership, so that they may expose and remove a "leadership" that seems
to me to be working against their best interests.

YOUR brand of Patriotism, Mr. Monahan, is spelled KOSHER!

FUNDAMENTALS OF AMERICANISM
(Edmondson Bulletin of July 24, 1939)

In the Congressional Record in June, 1939, w'as published "Americanism
Defined—A Politico-Religious Creed," by Charles Hall Davis of Virginia,
described by Maryland's Senator as "one of the profound Constitutional lawyers
of our Country.”

The undersigned was so deeply impressed with the contents of this
Americanism Creed that he had the entire document of about 6 pages reprinted
by the Government Printing Office, to make it broadly available to patriots at
the cost price.

I have herein given extracts therefrom. To my mind, this "Americanism
Defined” demonstrates beyond controversy that the Jews of America, unable
to accept the Christian Social System established by our forefathers, by their
own repudiation of assimilation, are actually in revolt against the Government
of, by and for The People of the United States.

The quoted passages below are from Mr. Davis' masterpiece except as in¬
dicated otherwise:

"The non-Christian citizen of the United States * “ !i mav worship God as he pleases
PROVIDED HE DOES NOT INTERFERE WITH OR INFRINGE UPON'the similar

1(53

and equal rights of others; YET HE MUST ACCEPT, ENDORSE AND SUPPORT
THE PRINCIPLES TAUGHT BY JESUS BECAUSE HIS RIGHTS AS SUCH CITIZEN
ARE BASED ON THESE PRINCIPLES AS THE FOUNDATIONS OF AMERICANISM.
NO MAN CAN BE A GOOD AMERICAN who does not accept, endorse and support
that Political Philosophy or Theory of Government.

Prominent Jews like Rabbi Wise. Ludwig Lewisohn, Jacob Schiff, Samuel I. Rosen-
man, Maurice Samuel, have repeatedly declared that Jews cannot be assimilated into the
organisms of the states in which they live. By that they proclaim hostility to such states
as well as their allegiance to Jewry first.

Mr. Davis points out: 'Americanism * * * is DIAMETRICALLY OPPOSED to
Communism, Bolshevism, Fascism, Nazism, Socialism, Totalitarianism, Paternalism, so-
calLed Social Democracy, and all other 'isms' which are based on the Political Philosophy
of the the Socialist School of Thought — because all of these 'ism’ * - * * assert the

sovereignty of government over the people."

Bialik, the great Jewish poet, in an address at Jerusalem May 11, 1933, proclaimed
that in principle Jews are "The creators of Liberalism, Democracy, Socialism and COM¬
MUNISM." While The London Jewish Chronicle of April 4, 1919, declared: "The Ideals
of Bolshevism ate at m£ny points consonant with the finest Ideals of Judaism."

A Compound Republic

The Creed continues:

"The United States of America is A REPUBLIC OF REPUBLICS—A COMPOUND
REPUBLIC. 'An indestructible union composed of indestrucdbLe states. 1

(Editorial Comment: When Washington invades or usurps functions of the republican
states of the Union, the great reserved rights are adversely affected, and loyal citizens have
a self-preservation duty to resist.

"The imposition of limitations on the powers of Government in the hands of agents
is a basic principle of the American Governmental Plan," savs Mr. Davis. "LIMITATIONS
CANNOT BE IMPOSED AND MAINTAINED ON GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITY
IN A PURE DEMOCRACY, because, when JThe People act they act AS SOVEREIGNS,
and any limitations agreed to be observed in their future actions can be abrogated or
revoked' by them at any time in the exerose of that same sovereignty.’’

Mr. Davis, in the above, supplies the reasons why ''democracy” was omitted
from The Constitution and The Declaration. The Founders and Framers would
have no "democracy’' and established a Government at Washington as the
MOST LIMITED REPUBLIC IN THE WORLD.

ZIONISTS PUT U. S. IN WORLD WAR
(Edmondson Bulletin July 25, 1939)

A sensational confession-communication published in the London "Jewish
Chronicle” of Feb. 7, 1936, signed by S. Landman, a Jew, World-War British
Propaganda Agent, indicates that Americans were slaughtered on European
battlefields and robbed at home in an effort TO ESTABLISH A JEWISH
STATE IN PALESTINE. The quotation below is self-explanatory:

"During the critical days of the war in 1916, when the defection of Russia
was imminent and Jewish opinion generally was' anti-Russia and had hopes
that Germany, if victorious, would give them Palestine, several attempts were
made by the Allies to bring America into the war on their side. These attempts
were UNSUCCESSFUL.

"Mr. James Malcolm, at that time in close touch, took the initiative in
convincing representatives of the British and French Governments that the best
and perhaps THE ONLY WAY TO INDUCE THE AMERICAN PRESI¬
DENT TO COME INTO WAR WAS TO SECURE THE CO-OPERATION
OF ZIONIST JEWRY BY PROMISING THEM PALESTINE.

"BY DOING SO, THE ALLIES WOULD ENLIST AND MOBILIZE
THE HITHERTO UNSUSPECTED POWERFUL FORCE OF ZIONIST

164

JEWRY IN AMERICA AND ELSEWHERE IN FAVOR OF THE ALLIES
ON A QUID PRO QUO BASIS, AT THAT TIME, PRESIDENT WILSON
ATTACHED THE GREATEST POSSIBLE IMPORTANCE TO THE AD¬
VICE OF MR. JUSTICE BRANDEIS (Zionist Leader in U. S.)

"Sir Mark Sykes obtained permission from the War Cabinet to authorize
Mr. Malcolm to approach the Zionists ON THAT BASIS.

"THE ZIONISTS CARRIED OUT THEIR PART AND HELPED BRING
AMERICA INTO THE WAR. The Balfour Declaration was not merely a
voluntary gesture on the part of the Allies, but it was A CONTRACT BE¬
TWEEN THE BRITISH GOVERNMENT and THE JEWISH PEOPLE—
Authority: "History of the Peace Conference in Paris, Vol. (1920) Page 173, by
H. M. V. Temperley (Jew)."

The following Associated Press table of June 15, 1936, is confirmatory oi
the foregoing: "The promise of a national home for Jews in Palestine to gain
world-wide support for the Allied Cause in the World War was detailed to the
House of Commons today by David Lloyd George. We came to the conclusion
that it was most vital that we should have the co-operation of Jews throughout
the world. I bear testimony to the fact that the Jews responded. 1 '

The Jewish Plan for world dominion is contained in the Super-Zionist
protocol-conception of a Jewish Palestine Super-Government which would con¬
trol through Jewish "Nationality" minorities in all important nations, through
the terrible power of the purse, reinforced by the 1200 billion dollars of wealth
contained in the Dead Sea at the Gateway between the Occident and the
Orient through the Suez Canal.

U. S. ARMY TRAINING MANUAL SUBVERTED

Below is an Edmondson Bulletin of September 26, 1939:

Citizenship Training Manual (TM-2000-25) of the War Department of
the United States was officially issued Nov. 30, 1928. By those who compiled
the Manual this statement is made:

"Training Manual 2000-25 is the product of years of study and instruction.
Every sentence was criticized by competent authorities, and approved by them
as being correct and in harmony with the American Philosophy of Government."

Following are some of the important passages in Training Manual 2000-25:

"The American Philosophy of Government emphasizes that "THE
GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES IS NOT A DEMOCRACY
BUT A REPUBLIC.

"DEMOCRACY is a government of The Masses; authority derived through
mass meeting or any other form of 'direct' expression results in mobocracy;
attitude toward property IS COMMUNISTIC—negating property rights; atti¬
tude toward law is that the will of the majority shall regulate, whether it be
based upon deliberation or governed by passion, prejudice and impulse, without
restraint or regard to consequences; results in demagogism, license, agitation,
discontent, anarchy, In practice . . . our form of government . . .is that of self-
government by representation, which is 'the golden mean between autocracy
and democracy,’ ”

By War Department letter of Sept. 6, 1932, Citizenship Training Manual
2000-25 was withdrawn after a criticism on the floor of the U. S. Senate—as
printed in Congressional Record Vol. 75, June 9, 1932, Pages 12782-5. "Some

165

of the matter was found to be of a controversial nature" says War Department
letter of Tulv 18, 1959. responding to request for a copy of the suppressed
TM-2000-25.

Is .it "controversial" that "The Government of the United States is not a
democracy but a Republic'?

Is it ‘'controversial" that "democracy is a government of the masses"?

Is it "controversial" trial "our representative government is the golden
mean between autocracy and democracy"?

Is it "controversial’’ that the "attitude of a democracy toward property is
COMMUNISTIC"?

And whom do you think was the Senate critic of the Citizenship Manual?
None other than Senator George W. Norris, Social Democrat from Nebraska,
"Father" of the Socialistic TVA Government Ownersliip Project.

Roosevelt was quoted by the N. Y. Times of Dec. 6, 1938, as saying: "Wt
are not only the largest and most powerful DEMOCRACY," but other democ¬
racies look to us for leadership—that World Democracy may survive."

Now note that "Social Democracy" Senator Norris, among other features,
especially objected (See Page 12785, Congressional Record 6-9-32), to the
following in Training Manual 2000-25:

"SOCIALISM OR COMMUNISM WHICH NEGATES PROPERTY
RIGHTS; ANARCHY, WHICH NEGATES LAW; Substitution of direct
action’ for Representative Government; Government Ownership — all should
be avoided as perils that threaten the very foundation of The Republic.”

CANADIAN ANTI-JEWISH PARTY LAUNCHED

(From 193S Edmondson Bulletin)

In the address below of July 4, 1938, launching the program of the Cana¬
dian National Unity Party, with its aims purely nationalistic and anti-Jewish,
under the battle-cry of "Canada for the Canadians," Leader Arcand of Montreal
outlined its objectives before a Toronto audience in Massey Hall numbering
more than 2500, mostly young men, "who thunderously cheered” the speaker,
according to the Toronto Evening Giobe of July 5, 1938.

Robert Edward Edmondson attended that enthusiastic meeting after addres¬
sing party convention leaders on the subject of U. S. conditions including eluci¬
dation of the victory won over Jewish anti-American elements who instigated
against him the false religious libel indictment dismissed May )Q, 1938.

A majority of the 85 national convention leaders were described in the
Toronto Evening Telegram of July 4 as "comparatively young, nattily dressed
and confident. THEY BELIEVE'IN THEMSELVES? Their enthusiasm is
contagious and inspirational. To the death ' Courage is prophetic. And they
are unitedly and intelligently ANTI-JEWISH. ' No Jews will be admitted into
membership declared Leader Arcand in the Toronto Daily Star of July 4. The
National Unity Party is going places." It is the organized spearhead of this
great patriotic movement in North America.

I have been in the midst of it. It is based on a moral rebirth. It is being
directed by master-strategy. It ls conducted under Spartan discipline. Its progress
is by law and order. And its energy has confounded the common enemv, whose
jittc-riness is exposed by overt acts. Its keynote 'Servian?'—I SERVE! is em¬
blematic of its fundamental character.

I 66

'We are going through," Leader Arcand declared in his inspiring address.

' We shall save Canada from the dutches of International Jewry. Who invented
the word Gentile? Who invented lew? We did not. They started the discrimina¬
tion. We will carrv 1 : on. It is a question of life or death.

’Russia is ruled lOdG by jews today. They would do the same to Canada.
This is a fight to the finish. Communism was invented by the Jew Karl Marx.
Socialism came to power in Frame through Blum. The Reds cn Spam were led
by the jews Zamorra, Azana. Rosenberg. In Hungary, it was Bela-Kuhn. In
England are Laski, Mdchett, Sassoon. The leader of the Communist Parry in
China is a Jew jews everywhere!

"When International Jewry gains power in a country, there i.-. no more
liberty'. Dictatorship of finance is held by the Jew-. Monty was made to serve, not
to exploit. Democracy has materialized and judaized us. Let us stand up and
fight it. Jews are being poured into our land from abroad-- revolutionaries,
destroyers. Look at the destruction of coffee, cotton, livestock, and other food!

"We are going to bring back the Great Fire ot Truth. We say Canada must
he a country of white men. We want Canada to be a Christian Country. Other
religions will be tolerated so iong as they do not ineance the security of the
state. WE ARE DEFENDING OUR HOMES!"

(1942 ADDENDA)

(For his patriotic selfless service Adrien Arcand was later interned five-
years without charges at the beginning of World War Two at the instigation of
the same forces who futilelv tried for seven years to jail Robert Edward Edmond¬
son, and which "International Jewry" brought on World War Two, as forecast
to Edmondson by former President David Brown of the American Hebrew at
a 1934 conference held in N. Y. City) .

ADULTERATING AMERICANISM

An Invitation Address delivered April 4. 1940, before the Public Relations
Council of The Women's City Club of Philadelphia by Robert Edward
Edmondson.

Your speaker deeply appreciates the privilege and opportunity of sub¬
mitting for your consideration authentic information ot immense importance
to our country in a great crisis.

The general subject of this address is Adulterating Traditional or
Constitutional Americanism."

Its aim is to prove to you how and why Americanism has been adulterated;
how to purge it of poison, and the way to restore it.

Making my position clear, I come before you with no political or sectional
partisanship—only a Militant American. Having no delusions of grandeur, my
sole "racket" is restoration of The Republic. As publicity is the only cure tor
great public evils, no "passion for anonymity" is permissible.

I unalterably stand against ACTIONS by any group-minority—political-
international-racial-economic-religious—which promotes ideologies alien to and
subversive of our traditional republic form of government as set up by the
U. S. Constitution.

In this address it is intended merely to Open perspectives for those who
mav be seeking truth and causes—in accord with our immortal Lincoln's ad¬
monition: "Let the people know the Truth—and the country u ill be sate'"

l 6 y

It is not- necessary to say that America is now in deep politico-economic
distress. Never has oar country been in such dire peril. What is responsible
for our apparent recovery-impotence? Has our moral fibre degenerated? If so,
what has rotted it?

In his 1939 book "Propaganda in the Next War," British Author Roger-
son said Americans were easy marks for mass-propaganda. In witness whereof,
he declared boldly that the United States was deliberately propaganda-embroiled
in the last great war. HAVI; WE DEGENERATELY STOPPED THINKING
FOR OURSELVES?

In crusading for regeneration of Americanism it is astounding to find how-
few cituens know their government, its political system, or rights and duties
involved.

Therefore, in these parlous times of compounded-confusion, propaganda
promoted, for clarity it is vital to understand just what one is talking about
before attempting to impart knowledge.

Just what is traditional or Constitutional Americanism? Let Charles Hall
Davis,. Virginia's high constitutional authority, make it plain:

"Americanism holds that the people are MASTERS of Government. The
Socialist School holds that Government is MASTER OF MEN,

"The fundamental principle of the American PLAN is that of LIMITA¬
TION on the powers of government.’’

Americanism is diametrically opposed to Communism. Bolshevism, Fascism,
Nazism, Totalitarianism, Social Democracy and Paternalism. THE UNITED
STATES IS A REPUBLIC OF REPUBLICS—A COMPOUND REPUBLIC!

"The non-Christian citizen of the United States may worship God as he
pleases provided he does not interfere with or infringe upon the similar and
equal rights of others; yet he must accept, endorse and support the principles
taught by Jesus because his rights as such citizen are based upon these principles
as the foundations of Americanism.” 1

In official supplementation, it is significant to note that in the 1928 Citizen¬
ship Training Manual of the L r . S. War Dept,, the following Republic confirma¬
tion is emphasized:

"The Government of the United States is NOT a democracy but A
REPUBLIC!''

Recall also that the Constitution guarantees to each of the 48 states "a
REPUBLICAN form of government," not a democratic form.

During an address on Dec. 10, 1938, before the Allentown, Pa., Anti-
Communist Society, the privilege was afforded me of making prominently
public for the first time in this modern era the fact that the word "democracy”
had been deleted by the signers, not only from the American Declaration of
Independence but also from the U. S. Constitution.

Hendrik Willem van Loon, in his "Story of Democracy,” declares "The
Athenian democracy perished, as practically EVERY EXPERIMENT IN
DEMOCRACY HAS COME TO A DIREFUL END—destroyed by its own
inner violence.”

An exhausive study has convinced me that the CAUSE of our major
troubles has been the adulteration of Americanism by repeared mass-immigra-
tion-waves of "the wretched refuse of Europe's teeming shores’—as Emma
Lazarus describes it in a poetic welcome recorded on the bronze tablet of the
Statue of Liberty in New York.

1 68

Socialistic "Refuse”

They have brought with them leveling-down socialise and collectivist ide¬
ologies.. Our forefathers left Europe to escape such false doctrines. These inter¬
national communizing conceptions are deadly poison to our individualistic
American Philosophy, with its check-and-balance protection against Proletarian
as well as Autocratic dictatorship.

Have we been too generous in alien policy? Have we worshiped at the
liberalistic shrine of the Fetish of Tolerance until it has grown into a Franken¬
stein monster? "There is a limit at which forebearance ceases to be a virtue"
declared the great English statesman, Edmund Burke.

You would not tolerate a rattlesnake in your home. Were the evil money¬
changers tolerated in the Temple—or were they lashed out?

Why should we compromise with a deadly enemy? In essence, tolerance is
international—like Communism, which is also anti-national. We have tolerated
an alien international flood that has dangerously diluted the Fountain of
Americanism.

The Constitution has not failed us—we have failed it. And the Treason of
Tolerance has had much to do with it.

The Constitution does not invest those enjoying its endowments, with the
right to destroy it. To exist, it must exact of citizens the eternal-vigilance duty
to defend-protect-preserve such beneficent instrumentality. We hear too much
today about rights, and too little about duties. But you cannot dodge the con¬
sequence of dodging your responsibilities.

The N. Y. Times of Sept. 13, 1939, reported that the Central Conference
of American Rabbis passed a resolution challenging the American System,
declaring:

"There is only one way in which the American people can escape Fascism
and Communism—and that is by establishing a thoroughly SOCIALIZED
DEMOCRACY.”

What is Social Democracy? Webster's International Dictionary defines it
as: "The Socialist Party founded in Germany by Ferdinand La Salle — later
united with the followers of Karl Marx.”

Do we Americans want in our country the Soviet democracy-communism of
Karl Marx, Trotsky and Lenin, which makes government supreme and suppresses
personal initiative? Shall we substitute that for the American Republic Individ¬
ualistic Philosophy which promotes personal initiative and security, preserves
property rights and provides sound progress and enduring happiness?

"Rugged’’ individualism in the sense of ruthlesness, is just as much to be
condemned as its opposite, the despotism of the proletariat, aptly described
by the immortal poet Homer as "that worst of tyrannies, an usurping crowd."
Traditional Americanism stands for the Golden Mean—not extremes.

When in 1913 Amendment 17 to the Constitution was adopted, a great
political communization occured; for it set up a "POPULAR FRONT" election
of senators in repudiation of the famous check-and-balance function originally
established providing for legislative selection.

High legal authority holds this 17th Amendment to be unconstitutional
because states were deprived, without consent, of equal suffrage or "ambas¬
sadorial representation" at Washington as sovereign units. Eleven states
DEMURRED.

169

President Roosevelt internationally proclaimed— (I quote from the N, Y.
Times of Dec. (•>, 1938): "We are not only the largest and most powerful
democracy, but other democracies look to us for leadership, that world democracy
may survive.”

Yet the LIMITATION-p rinciple corner-stone of our Republic is repugnant
to democracy because it is destructive of democracy.

This Socialistic New Deal is NOT Americanism. It is a foreign importa¬
tion. brought here through Great Britain, where it was called ''PEP''— like the
NEP” of Russia; in both cases the alphabetical trick-explanation standing tor
Economic Planning. " Its sponsor was the Socialistic Fabian Society of Britain.

What has happened? Americans have been Communistically regimented and
their governmental administration has been Ease istically centralized under the
impcrted international New Deal.

Unless Americanism is purged—make no mistake, DOWN GOES THE
REPUBLIC! Therefore, we are in a self-preservation fight to the finish—a
struggle for existence itself. How can we save ourselves- 1

Obviously, the first remedial step is to stop immigration, strictly limiting
visitors, the second is to deport aliens, the third is to Americanize new citizens.
What is to be done with those who refuse to assimilate? The Christian Century
ol Chicago (April 29 and May 13, 1936) offers this keen comment: I quote:

Anti-Assimilationists Make Trouble

''American society is an organism, and, as such, ali its vital forces tend
toward solidarity, unity, integration. Any unassimilated element of the popula¬
tion is bound to have trouble because it is BOUND TO MAKE TROUBLE.”

The politico-economic subversions heretofore listed could have been stop¬
ped at their inception if we had a press that was FREE? Many of you mav
think we have a free press. As a veteran journalist, I warn you that such is not
the case.

One of my exposure publications on this subject was quoted recently in
the Congressional Record. It emphasized these fundamentals;

What is the DUTY of the press to the nation that endows it with freedom?
Isn't it to guard jealously the state which creates it?

Our press is tree—to betray us. Through secret coercion, it hides the
real news. It dogs channels of publicity with anti-American propaganda. It sells
its columns to an alien enemy. Judas-like, it betrays its creator for "a piece of
silver.” r

How can we emancipate this, our first line of defense? By boycotting
offending publications. Without circulation, advertising space becomes worth¬
less. As a veteran newspaperman, your speaker tells you that when an editor
receives half a dozen sharp criticisms from his reading public, he becomes
jittery. He hears his master’s voice.

Let us stop once and for all this destructive Adulteration of Americanism.
Be George Washington vigilante patriots. Put none but Militant Americans on
guard! Think Straight America! Speak Plain American! Act and Vote Direct
American!

Let us proclaim a New Declaration of Independence from internationalism.
Shall we sit supinely inert while loyal citizens and their children are denied
their priceless heritage of equal rights by alien elements winch crowd them out of
the channels of achievement in their own country?

1 70

What is our practical political recourse.'’ \vhen our Washington servants
usurp any of the ch'eck-and-balance functions of the government, the great re¬
tained rights of the citizenry are adversely affected, and under Constitutional
endowments thev have a duty to resist.

When elected and appointed officers disregard their sworn duties, Ameri¬
can citizens automatically become virtual state militia. They can be constitution¬
ally deputized under local sheriffs into militant vigilantes exercising the pro¬
tective reserved-powers of the sovereign scates.

I do not believe that Militant Americanism is dc-ad. It still lives in the
great heart of the nation. It has been lulled into fancied security by rhe siren
songs of the Lilliputians of an anti-human Socialism that will not work. _

We Americans of today are being tested in a patriotic crucible. Shall we be
found fit for and worthy of the matchless heritage bequeathed to us by our giant
forefathers, who selflessly laid their lives, their fortunes and their sacred honor
on the Altar of Country? God grant it!

The international enemy is not going to give up the rich prize of America
without a show of force. It may or may not be physical.

Some of us may be called upon to make the supreme sacrifice! Shall we
shrink from that? Our heroic forefathers did not draw back. If they had, where
would you and I be today?

If Americanism is to survive, ALIENISM MUST BE DESTROYED.

We shall keep America American just so long as the Land of the Free is
the Land of the Brave.

STAND FAST FOR THE REPUBLIC.

I thank you!

JEWS CALL FOR "DEMOCRACY’’—

THEN ADMIT IT "FAILED IN EUROPE"

(From Edmondson Broadcast of Jan. 16,1940)

"Our President ... has called upon men and women . . . to preserve the principles
of Democracy. Race consciousness is creeping into our political life . . . Increasingly we
hear of racial or relig'Ous blocs. Divisions between our people must not be allowed it
Democracy «s to be preserved. Hate begets hate, and intolerance begets intolerance. —
"When the social and economic SYSTEM OF DEMOCRACY BROKE DOWN (in
Eurofce) men could no longer make a living, and individual liberties were surrendered.
Dictatorships gamed a foothold."—N. Y. Gov. H. H. Lehman’s Jackson Day Dinner
Speech (N. Y. Times 1-9-40).

Constitutionalists Damn Democracy

"Pure Democracies have ever been the scenes of turbulence and contention; have ever
been found incompatible with personal security or rights of property." — Constitution-
Framer James Madison in The Federalist, November, 1787.

As a loyal American I am required to be INTOLERANT of religious or
racial activities dangerous to the peace and safety of The Republic.

And I am required to be INTOLERANT of Jewish anti-American politico-
economic activities tending to change the form of the present government of
the United States without the constitutional consent of the people.

Either you are FOR The Republic, or you are against it. THERE CAN BE

NO COMPROMISE IN THIS SUPREME CRISIS.

DEMOCRACY DESTROYS CIVILIZED LIBERTIES
(From Edmondson Bulletin Jan. 16, 1940)

Lord Macaulay, famous English statesman, in a letter of May 23, 1ST', to
a New Yorker, delivered a scathing denunciation of "Democracy” in the langu¬
age quoted below:

171

"I have been convinced chat institutions purely DEMOCRATIC must,
sooner or later, DESTROY LIBERTY AND CIVILIZATION. Either the poor
will plunder the rich, or order would be saved by a strong military government.

"The Huns and Vandals who ravaged the Roman Empire came from with¬
out; your Huns and Vandals will have been engendered within your own
country.”

(The quotation is taken from "Macaulay’s Life and Letters” by G. O.
Trevelyan, Voi. 1, 1875).

The foregoing was printed in the Wilkesbarre (Pa.) "Record” of Jan.
11, 1940.

PROTOCOL FULFILLMENT
(Analytical Edmondson Bulletin of Feb. 20, 1940)

Under the title "The Jews & Freemasons—Exploding the Myth of a World Con¬
spiracy,” Bernarr Mactadden's weekly magazine "Liberty" of February 10 and 17, 1940,
attempts to g've International Jewry a clean bill of health as regards its complicity with
the "Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion' 'and rheir plans for world domination.

"Why does this publication so prominently champion Jewry?" The answer may be
found in the point that Bernard MacFadden is generally known in N. Y. City as a half-
Jew—which supplies prejudice.

So much for inspiration. Since the article supplies nothing new and is a rehash of
old stuff, the sin of omission stands out like a sore thumb and is also confirmatory of
bias, for the re-write authors base their forgery-allegation largely on a Berne canton trial
in Switzerland where the lower court is said to have handed down a decision in which
the protocols were alluded to as forgeries in "by-talk" of no legal value—but which verdict
was REVERSED later (N. Y. World-Telegram 11-1-37) by the Switzerland High Court
of Appeals with the statement that the question of whether or not the Protocols of the
Elders of Zion were authentic was not the issue in the case—the technical charge being
distribution of "indecent" literature. So that there was no "forgery verdict.”

WHAT ARE THE PROTOCOLS?

Just what are "The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion"?

A book placed in the British Museum via Russia in 1906 containing a record of 2-i
alleged secret meetings of an International Tewish Sanhedrin called "The Kehiliah." "The
Protocols" are now reported as having a circulation larger than The Bible. Authorship is
anonymous.

What is their purport?

A plot or organized conspiracy to establish a world Jewish super-government.

Do they indicate how this is to be done?

Yes. The protocolic war-strategy is to promote Communistic revolution among
Gentile nations and seize politico-economic control during the chaos through "the power
of gold," which is declared to have been cornered by Jews through subsidization of the
press.

Americanism is unconcerned with the authenticity or the authorship of the famous
so-called "Protocols of the Learned Eiders of Zion,” or whether, as alleged by Jewish
writers, they are "racial libels,” "forgeries" or "plagiarisms.”

Americanism IS concerned with WHY such prophecy-plans, used to promote the
bloody Jewish-Communist Conquest of Russia in 1917, have also been adopted and actually
fulfilled in subversive Communistic laws and administration by the Jewish-Radica! Roose¬
velt "New Deal" Regime.

"There is not an iota of proof” says the "Liberty" article, "in the statement that the
League of Nations was "the creation of Jewish minds,” Yet Zionist Leader Nahum
Sokoloff declared: "We Jews established the League of Nations after a fight of 25 years
(N. Y. Times Aug. 28, 1922). Jewish Poet Zangwill held the League to be a "Jewish
Aspiration.” "A single world government is coming; we are going through the pangs of
this creation AT THE PRESENT TIME,” declared Rabbi B. B. Glazer of N Y City
(N. Y. Times, 12-11-39).

The "Liberty" article also scornfully refers to "an alleged statement by Benjamin
Franklin warning the American people against Jew’s—a statement long discredited by

17 2

scholars" That prophecy" is in the same class with the protocols, fur Franklin author¬
ship has never been legally proved nor disproved; but the N. V Public Library contains
"Beniamin Franklin’s Writings" by Smvthe, Vol. 8, in which appears very repeated
antagonism bv the American statesman against Jewish acts; ann the prophecies them-
Svls i” likeThe protocols, being fulfilled BY JEWS IN AMERICA through the
Roosevelt ’ Jewish-Radical Administration, as detailed comparisons herewitn incontro-
.vertibly show.

The Last edition of the Nilus protocols "was confiscated by the Kerensky government
of Russia in 1917" says the magazine story. Kerensky is a Jew.

Machiavelli is drawn upon to show that the protocols were taken from the Italian
statesman's peculiar political philosophy, but it is not necessary to verify the chosen
people" obsession as to world dominion, to search history any further than Biblical
repetition of Jehovah promises to Israelites as to their prospective world super-government.

Extracts below are from protocol plans, with their actual fulfillments in American
political-economic life, the figures after paragraphs being protocol numbers:

POLITICS

Protocol Plans

Far back in the ancient times we were
the first to cry "Liberty, Equality', Fratern¬
ity/'_i. When we introduced into state

organisms the Poison of Liberalism, states
have been seized with a mortal illness.—10.

Fulfillments

The United States of America is 'sick"
politically. Is this illness due to a poison¬
ous propaganda flood of Liberalism, Social¬
ism, Communism—during the Jewish-Rad-
ical New Deal Regime?

The political has nothing in common wich
the moral: he who wishes to rule must have
recourse to cunning and make-believe;
frankness and honesty are vices in politics.
— 1 .

Note broken pledges of the Jewish-Rad-
ical Roosevelt Administration: "Sound
money at all hazards"; "Farm recovery must
not he coercive"; "a tariff commission free
from executive interference", "we will cut
government expenses 2 5 per cent." whereas
national debt has trebled.

In politics we must know how to seize
the property of others without hesitation:
we must not stop at bribery, deceit and
treachery.—1.

A satisfactory government is one that
concentrates in the hands of one person
only.—10.

Throughout Europe and other continents
we must produce ferments, discords and
hostility. Intensification of armaments is
essential to the completion of our plans—7.

We shall appear as alleged saviors of
the worker from oppression, and propose
to him to enter the ranks of our fighting
forces—Socialists, Communists and Anarch¬
ists.—3.

We have got into our hands the admin¬
istration of the law. conduct of elections,
the press, and educational training. We
have foolc-d. bemused and corrupted the
youth of the Gentiles by rearing them in
principles and theories which are known to
us to be fallacies, although it is by us that
they have been inculcated.—9-

Our power will be more invincible, than
any other because it will remain invisible
until it has gained such strength that noth¬
ing can undermine it.—1.

Were voters "bribed" with Santa Claus
gifts, and deceived by the New Deal ad¬
ministration of Jewish-Radical reforms? 1 "

Roosevelt was unquestionably given dic¬
tatorial powers by pressure on Congress,
which initiated few New Deal laws.

Is there discord in Europe and America?
Are the armaments of Russia, France, Italy,
England, Germany, japan being increased?

New' Dealers have constantly posed as
saviors of labor with Sidney Hillman's CIO.
The American Federation of Labor is re¬
ported to have bec-n communistkally sub¬
verted. Its Jewish Vice-President Woll wel¬
comes refugees. Its General Counsel. Jos. A.
Padway. is a Jew.

Are jc-wish-Radical elements in promin¬
ent university professorships and columnist
positions of great metropolitan newspapers?
Has tire U. S. Supreme Court been under¬
mined by packing" appointments?

Have we "invisible government" by Jewish
unofficial advisors" at Washington, such
35 Brandeis, Frankfurter. Morgenthau,
Baruch and hundreds of other Key-Jews?

173

Protocol Plans

Fulfillments

The principal factor in Politics is secrecy;
the word should not agree with the deed
of the diplomat.—7.

We have in our service persons of all
doctrines — Communists, Socialists, dema¬
gogues, utopian dreamers.—9-

To sum up our system of keeping the
governments of the Gentiles of Europe in
check, we shall show our strength to one
of them by terrorist attempts,—7,

We shall create an intensified centraliza¬
tion of government.—5.

We have set the people on the hobby¬
horse of an idea about the absorbtion of
individuality by the symbolic unit of col¬
lectivism. This hobby-horse is a manifest
violation of the most important law of
nature, which has established one unit un¬
like another precisely for the purpose of
instituting individuality.—15.

We must discredit personal initiative;
nothing is more dangerous to our cause.—5.

The best results in governing are attained
by violence.— l.

God has given to us (his Chosen People),
the gift of dispersion, and in this, which
appears to be our weakness, has come forth
our strength—which has brought us to the
threshold of sovereignty over all the world.
— 11 .

Who knows the secret framers of the
Securities Paralysis Act, Monetary Defla¬
tion Law, NRA, SEC and 5-Billion Relief
Measure? Mordecai Ezekiel framed the
AAA. Nathan Margold runs the Interior
Dept., Herbert Feis the State Dept.

Washington.swarms with all those classes,
including members of the Frankfurter
American Civil Liberties Union.

The "Red Terror" in Russia has "liqui¬
dated" 20 million Gentiles. It butchered
Spain. NRA "economic death" policy ter¬
rorized and ruined American small busi¬
ness men,

Political power has been centered as never
before in Washington, with legislative
power usurped.

United States church reds, radicals, social¬
ists and demagogues ride this hobby-horse
roughshod over all American Constitutional
rights.

Restrictive regimentation laws in industry
and agriculture have extensively curtailed
individual liberties and destroyed personal
initiative.

There has been more strike violence dur¬
ing the Roosevelt Jewish-Radical Regime
than in over 25 years previous.

How does this check up wth super-gov¬
ernment League of Nations "aspirations"
voiced by Jewish Author Zangwill in 1920,
Zionist Leader Sokolow in 1922 and Rabbi
Wise at the 193d Geneva Jewish Congress?

ECONOMICS

Economic crises have been produced by
us for the Gentiles by no other means than,
withdrawal of money from circulation,—20.

Wars should be brought on to the econ¬
omic ground; our INTERNATIONAL
r'ghts will then WIPE OUT NATIONAL
RIGHTS—2; the despotism of capital is
entirely in our hands.—1.

We shall establish huge monopolies.—6

As landed proprietors can be most harm¬
ful to us from the fact that they are self-
sufficing, it is essential for us to deprive
them of their land by loading it with
debt.— 6.

Did cornering of money and the with¬
drawal thereof cause, and is it prolonging
the "Great Suppression?"

Germany, Japan, Spain, and Italy are
being subjected to Jewish Financial Boycott
pressure for expelling Jewish Communiscs.
"Wars are generally caused by economic
pressure," Jewish Speculator Baruch told a
Senate Committee March 27, 1935.

Was NRA a "huge monoply?" American
credit and banking have been monopolized
by the Jewish-Radical New Dealers.

Are not U. S. farms overloaded with
debt-mortgages?

1 74

Protocot Plans

Vc shall raise wages, winch, however,
will not bring any advantage to wotacers,
tor at the same time we shaJ produceu
rise in the prices for the necessities of life.
— 6 .

To give the Gentiles no time to think,
their minds must be diverted * * thus
all nations will take no note of their
common foe.—4.

THE

We must compel governments to act as
favored by our plans, secretly promoted
through the great power of the press which,
with "but few exceptions which may be
disregarded, is already in our hands.—7,

To put public opinion in our hands we
must bring it to a state of bewilderment by-
giving expression on all sides to so many
contradictory opinions as to cause the
Gentiles to’ lose rheir heads and make it
impossible to know where they are in the
resulting chaos.—5.

Fulfillments

The cost of living is rising faster than
wages under the Jewish-Radical New Deal,
due to food destruction, enormous con¬
fiscatory new taxation, experiment and
doubling of national debt.

Isn't the American majority, due- to diver¬
sions. its subverted press, and misleading
propaganda, still blind to the deadly peril
of the Internationalist menace:

PRESS

The American press, screen and radio,
are Jewish-dominated through ownership,
advertising subsidization and distribution
channels control.

This is a key-strategy of the protocols.
Have we been bewildered by the Jewish-
Radical New- Dealer flood of propaganda
in the press, over the air and on the screens
Deceive-Confuse-Collapse-Dictate — That is
the outline of the Plan of Jewish Com¬
munistic Democracy to Enslave America.

DEATH-WARNING TO CONGRESSMAN
(Edmondson Bulletin March 27, 1940)

The following is a significant extract from the Congressional Record of March l -i,
1940:

■'(Hon Jacob Thorkelson of Montana) Mr. Speaker. I ask unanimous consent to
address The House for one minute. On March 4, 1 spoke in New York on the rights ot
the people as set forth in the Constitution of the U. S. (Ed. Note: He covered a lecture
before a packed meeting of the Christian Mobilizes in New Yoik).

"In the mail today I received a book entiled "ChoiceMs Mine " and appended to the
book were these notices, WHICH ARE A THREAT ON MY LIFE: Thorkelson. Me-
Williams’ dupes have learned not their lesson. Have you learned yours yet' Evidently
not but it's in this story—if you want to know what its all about before you re called.
Don't forget: This trip may end any second. Have you the courage to face your maker.
Be prepared! Read "Choice Is Mine"—because the next time you may be one of those on

ihe other side.'

"Mr Speaker, the writer did not sign his name. We know, however, happenings of
rl-w= nait- and messages of this sort should not be treated lightly, for it is significant that
our S pdlaog Spur, moots ARE LAX IN THEIR OBLIGATED DUTIES.

"In reading this book, one can raise no question AS TO ITS ORIGIN, and I say now
that if the Department of Justice and other law-enforcement bodies do not Pf^ect their
own citizens in the performance of their duties to this Republic, THE PEOPLE IHbM-
SELVES MUST TAKE ACTION AND REMOVE THE MENACE WHICH IS
THREATENING OUR NATION."

When Congressman Thorkelson referred to other "happenings of the past, doubtless
he had in mind the reported poisoning of the lace Pennsylvania Congressman Lours T.
McFadden, who had been inserting in the Congressional Record great volumes of Jew-
exposing records-as is Thorkelson; and when McFadden died the Jewish Senunel of
Chicago (10-8-36) published his picture with a sub-caption OUT OF THE WAY.

Whose way?

I recall the shooting of former Senator Huey Long of Louisiana by Jewish Dr. Weiss
ten days after he began to make overtures looking to a Jewish Problem conference with
me The'late Senator Thomas D. Schall of Minnesota met with a mysterious fatal accident
shortly after he wrote to me praising aggression in crusading for Americanism.

While living in New York City the undersigned received many threats similar to
those sent Congressman Thorkelson; but, notwithstanding Jewish Communist warnings,

1 7 5

"Lawless Mayor LaGuardia" cancelled my pistol permit after a Jew' had invaded my
office with hostile intent—and then left hurriedly after seerng the gun on my desk,
muttering Til gee you!"

Under the circumstances, Congressman Thorkelson is fully justified in having these
threats put in the record and declaring that the people must act to save The Republic.

THE JEWISH MENACE

(A By-Request Brevity Question-Answer Analysis of March 26 , 1940

by Edmondson)

What is the variously called Jewish Threat, Jewish Peril, Jewish Plague.
Jewish Problem?

A destructive attempt to dominate non-Jew peoples by a super-organized
international secret pow'er exercised economically and politically by Jewish
Minority Solidarity,

Why is it a peril for Americans?

Because it attacks individual and national existences, to substitute therefore
its anti-Gentile ideologies, including ”a thoroughly socialized democracy/’ Jewry
refuses to assimilate, acting as a disintegrating solvent.

How?

Through its coercive monopoly-weapon of the gold money supply of the
world.

How did it get such control?

By economic planning during many centuries, as indicated by biblical and
secular records.

What is the root cause of the movement?

Materialistic deification worship of the Golden Calf for thousands of
years; during which time Jews learned "all the secrets that lay hid” in money-
manipulation, which made them "Lords of Money” and Lords of the Material¬
istic World.

In view of the Chosen People Tradition, did religion have much to do
with this activity?

"Since you can’t "religionize” materialism—only the spirit—the answer
must be "No!’’ Jews use religion and race as screens to hide their subversions,

What is meant by the "Chosen People Myth?’’

Both Protestant and Catholic Christian documents agree thar Jews were
once chosen by their God as a favored people, and then repudiated.

Did race have anything to do with the matter?

Only in the sense of planned intensification or an anci-assimilation in-
breeding—to promote the Jewish Common Solidarity.

Why does the Jewish Peril menace all American Life?

Because its materialistic ideology is carried out through a Socialistic, Com¬
munistic, Atheistic leveling-down of peoples into the status of slaves.

What is the alleged Anti-Semitic persecution to which the Jews constantly
refer?

The term is a misleading blanket camouflage because the 10 to 15 million
Arabs and Syrians also belong to the Semite Race, as well as the Jew's.

What causes ami-Jewishness?

The presence of Jews in perceptible numbers in any Gentile community,
confesses their great Zionist Pounder-Leader Theodor Herzl in his book 'The
Jewish State.” Where there are no Jews, "anti-Semitism” does not exist.

176

What is the Jewish Problem IN SOLUTION.-'

Politico-Economic, because of its monetary-tyranny domination.

What is the remedy?

Destruction of the international Jewish monetary monopoly-mechanism and
disfranchisement.

How can that be done?

By national governmental action.

Through what method?

Free press publicity which educationally produces corrective legislation.

Can that be effected?

Yes, through disfranchisement and deportation of Jews on the ground that
the practice of their internationalist "Way of Life" constitutes a danger to the
peace and safety of The Republic, under the Constitution. Jews have been ex¬
pelled from every civilized nation in the past because they became a politico-
economic menace to the state, not on account of their religion,

Where can they be humanely sent?

To the healthful and little developed fertile Island of Madagascar off the
southeast coast of Africa, and which wili hoid ail of them.

A MILITANT PRO-AMERICAN PLAN IN ACTION
(Published April 20, 1940, by Edmondson)

THE PRESS: Let Militant American Patriots in small-group action, write and call
upon newspaper and magazine publishers and editors repeatedly, in every town and city,
and lawfully warn them against suppression of TRUTH in news and editorials and
columnist propaganda, under penalty of withdrawal of Gentile subscriptions and advertis¬
ing; and of documentary exposures of evidence of treasonable publicity. Offending publica-
ations should be boycotted in every lawful manner. Hold patriotic protest meetings. Send
adopted resolutions to editors.

For efficient action. Vigilante Patriotic Groups must make a special study of the
Fundamentals of Traditional Americanism, starting from the fact that the United States
is A Republic—not a Democracy. Deliver documented lectures. Give detailed factual
references.

THE PRESS IS WITHOUT CONSTITUTIONAL FREEDOM-AUTHORITY TO
PUBLISH MATTER DESTRUCTIVE OF THE GOVERNMENT WHICH . ENDOWS
IT WITH THE RIGHT OF FREE SPEECH, It is endowed with the Right to Create—
not to Destroy good government.

Jewish control of advertising, plus financial coercion, plus ownership, plus distribu¬
tion-direction—have subverted the news Freedom of The Press in the Ciries of the United
States in violation of the Constitutional guarantee, to the extent that Truth is suppressed
from the news and Propaganda subversive of The Spirit of Americanism prevails through¬
out the Nation.

THE RADIO AND SCREEN: Similar lawful warnings should be given to managers
of radio stations, movie theaters and picture producers. Hold specific protest assemblies,

The Radio and Screen have developed highly effective channels of current news,
education and subversive propaganda. Radio stations are under Federal license, and
advertising Jews dominate the big broadcasting systems, as well as the moving picture
industry/

Remember that publicity pressure by the Catholic League for Decency brought im¬
portant remedial action as to immoral screen pictures. Emulate such methods!

EDUCATIONAL AUTHORITIES: Similar lawful warnings should be given to
heads of universities, colleges and other "higher-education” professors who may be
educated beyond their intellectual capacity to comprehend basic Americanism.

Tell them that, in addition to Rights derived from the Constitution, they owe Duties
to it; that American Freedom comes before Academic Freedom—The latter perishes if
the former falls.

Tell them that contributions from state authorities and others will be stopped by
patriotic action unless their allegiance is first to the basic American ideologies that make
it possible for them to enjoy Lite, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness. Deliver exposing
lectures.

177

RACIAL MINORITIES: Simitar tawful warning dmuld tx given iv representatives
0 f the Jewish Minority, which refuses to assimilate into the single organism of Ameri¬
canism and demands by resolution that a chorougnly socialized democracy (communism)
be substituted in place of the American Republic System Hole peaceful exposure as¬
semblies.

Tel! lews that unless thev change the anti-American practice of their "way of life"
from being a '"danger to the peace and safety' of The Republic, they will be deported by
authority of a new constitutional amendment. Protest to legislators, demanding justice tor
Gentiles.

American patriots seek no violence-only exact justice. Legal advice in this, con¬
nection is impeiativc to avoid jew traps set by tricksters backed by unlimited iuaus.
Document all charge*.

CHURCH ADMINISTRATIONS. Similar lawful warnings should be given to church
leadership because of an ami-American departure from Fundamental Moral Teachings and
ecclesiastical invasion of Politico-Economic Fields, where they try to <fomniace_ wocnout
having practical knowledge of affairs. Write letters to them and call meetings ot protest.
Don't pussyfoot!

Point out that a cardinal principle of Americanism is separation of Church and State.
Religion and Politics; and that a sound solution of Economic, Financial and Monetary
Problems requires special knowledge, which they do not possess.

Tell them that preaching of Collectivist Socialism and Communistic Democracy is
against Individual Traditional Americanism, and must be stopped; that the Right of
Free Speech guaranteed by The Republic, does not confer upon them the privilege of
destroying the Constitutional Government winch makes them secure in their individual
right to the enjoyment of Life. Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.

BE MILITANT!

Rescue The Republic!

"NO JEW-WAR FOR U. S."

(Edmondson Bulletin of April 23, 19-40)

Kenneth A. Brown, of Gervais, Oregon, 31, unmarried, college graduate,
scion of one of Oregon's oldest and respected families, for ten years operating
large scale farming enterprises, has announced his candidacy for the Republican
Congressional nomination in the First Oregon District; and in his circular an¬
nouncement of April 12, 1940, he submitted the following statement, which
was suppressed by The Press of his state:

1 In this campaign upon which I am entering, and which wiil be noteworthy
for its forthright frankness, I shall, in discussing vital issues of the day, call a
spade a spade, and, where necessary, A JEW A JEW.

"The present European conflict is but an expression of the World Jewish
Problem—the frantic effort to establish Jewish Hegemony throughout the
world. The guiding political power in America reposes in the hands of these
Internationals.

"Appreciating these facts, I view as the greatest threat to American well¬
being today the effort being made to draw us into this war—either in Europe
or Asia.

"IN COMMITTING MYSELF TO THIS PROGRAM I DO SO WITH
FULL REALIZATION OF THE PERSONAL HAZARDS INVOLVED. CER¬
TAINLY TO TAKE SUCH A STAND IS TO PLACE A PRICE ON MY
HEAD; WILL RESULT IN UNSCRUPULOUS ATTACKS UPON MY
CHARACTER AND UPON MY MOTIVES. YET THESE SACRIFICES I
AM PREPARED TO ASSUME IF I MAY CONTRIBUTE SOME TANGI¬
BLE RESISTANCE TO THAT INVISIBLE GOVERNMENT WHICH TO¬
DAY PREPARES TO MAKE BLOODY MERCHANDISE OF AMERICAN
LIFE AND COMMONWEALTH.

1 7 S

"I have no affiliations or connections with any group whatsoever, and
personally accept full responsibility for the statement herein contained, and for
the statements which shall subsequently appear through my campaign." (signed) .

In his supplementary circular ol April 12, Mr. Brown, who receives
Edmondson reports, comments vigorously as follows:

"Why was this statement denied recognition in Oregon newspapers? By this
un-American act of suppression, Freedom of Speech is challenged.

"The news was suppressed because it dared to TELL THE TRUTH. No
casual statement is this—THIS IS NEWS. It constitutes a terrible indictment,
which, by its very nature and content, demands recognition—refutation, if it
be false! acclaim, if it be true.

"Suppression is not the American way. This reveals a Conspiracy of
Silence on part of The Press and the news agencies to prevent MY MESSAGE
OF TRUTH FROM REACHING THE PEOPLE.

"Words of mine might lack conviction. BUT HERE YOU HAVE THE
PROOF! Proof that news inimical to JEWISH design can be and is withheld
from the American people. Who, then, controls our Press? To what low estate
has the American Press descended?"

This typical western American farm youth, with high courage, superior
intelligence, grim determination and super-audacity, lays his honor, his fortune
and his life on the altar of country in a fearless American anti-war defi to the
greatest subversive politico-economic power ever confronting national patriotism.

Can we do less, and live with ourselves?

WAR OR PEACE FOR U. S. ?

JEWISH WAR-CONTROL SET-UP
(1914-18)

''Democracy" Washington Wilson Regime.
Wilson Administration Jew-controlled.

Wilson Chief Economic Advisor' Bernard
M. Baruch, who admitted he then had
more war-power than anyone.

Wilson Banker-Advisor, Henry Morgen-
thau, Sr., International Banker.

Wilson Political-Advisor, Col. E. Mandel-
House, Author of "Phihp Dru."

Wilson Publicist, Walter Lippmann.
Wilson-appointed Judicial Advisor U. S.
Supreme Court Justice Louis D. Brandeis,
who proclaimed Jews to be a "national¬
ity."

Wilson "Bolsheviki Defender," Felix
Frankfurter, denounced by Theo. Roose¬
velt as Red.

Warcry: "Make the world safe for
Democracy!”

Look at the war set-ups at the top
ask yourself whether or not power lies
European Suicide War.

JEWISH WAR-CONTROL SET-UP
(1953-40)

"Democracy" Washington Roosevelt Re¬
gime.

Roosevelt Administration Jew-Controlled—
Brooklyn Jewish Examiner admits (10-
2 0-33) it appointed more Jews than any
other.

Roosevelt Chief Economic Advisor Bernard
M. Baruch, told a Senate Committee
( 3-27-35) that wars are now generally
"caused by economic pressure;" favored
U. S. force to keep European ideologies
out of South America (St. Louis Post-
Dispatch 11-1-38); called National
Patriotism a "lot of nonsense" (Chicago
Tribune 9-25-35).

Roosevelt Secretary of Treasury, Henry
Morgenthau, Jr., Dictator of Two Billion
Equalization Fund.

Roosevelt "Right Arm" Advisor Justice
SamueL I. Rosenman.

Roosevelt Publicist, Walter Lippmann.

Roosevelt New Deal "Father," Louis D.
Brandeis, of the U. S. Supreme Court,
Zionist Leadership.

Roosevelt Political Advisor, "Karl Marx
Prof.” Felix Frankfurter, appointed to
U. S. Supreme Court by Roosevelt.

Warcry; "Make the world safe for

Democracy!"

of this bulletin of October 24, 1939, and
in alien, hands to force America into the

1 79

Addenda

JEWS BRINGING ON WAR?

entit/ed a A tide of J UIie 19 ^> Partly quoted below.

nf ti ^ u E l i ’ 1 Trm, ? ph 0ver Horst WesscI?," Germans hold lies proof
of the Jewish intention to launch another world war. °

"It has become patent that a Combination of Britain, France and Russia
wall sooner or later bar the triumphant marcli of Hitler.

"!n France the Jew of prominence is Leon Blum. He may yet be the Moses
wh 0 w H Had founder,ng La Belle out of the wilderness. Mal.m LNinoff"
he high-pressure gentleman who sold President Roosevelr on the recognition of
the Soviet Gove. * * * He ha * been solely responsible for the formulation M

Cvr s hck e Ind £ ,Cy ' h Th ! L ^ llSh ] r ° f P rominence is Leslie Hore-Belisha.
ftl As for War, he

. Would 1C Linholy to suggest that these three nations bound by numerous
1n \T ^ u nd m n a State ° f Virtaal althou S h undeclared alliance \vill stand

shoulder to shoulder to ward off the strides of Hitler to the East? ’

"WHEN THE SMOKE OF BATTLE clears there may be presented a
tableau show.ng the man who played God, the swastika ChrMus being lowered
none too gently mro a hole in the ground, as the trio of non-Ar^ns intone

in grand fma,e ,nt0 * "»«.

F I F Tva Z Prt f‘ dem ° aV,d A - Brown of the American Hebrew told Robert
Edward Edmondson m 1934: "We are going to bring a war on Germany.”

to

WHU WANTS WAR-
(Edmondson Broadcast of May 24, 1940)

Jcnn the Allies or Perish!
says Jewish Columnist Lippmann

„ , "N T fiiSamiC rff ' >n <>f whKh **• »„*!, may nor be sufficient

Er d of . pec,ple <rorn findi "« themselves .solated end surrounded in a

world ot victorious aggressor-states. d

-THE PLAIN, HARD, INDISPUTABLE TRUTH IS THAT THE CATASTROPHE

™ S ^bT D ONLY BY ™ RESrSTANcf OF TOe“s

"Once outposts arc in the hands of victorious, unfriendly, aggressive and hunerv

EbE whEhut'e”: '' a "° Wed th ' t,me “ ° UrSdra

™ !S ” IS AT BEST AN -™nt

res.se THEY MUST BE TOLD THAT WL SHaLlX

THIS SUMMER, AND THAT, IF THEY HOLD ON, THE ENORMOUS RFSOURm*;

OF THIS COUNTRY WILL BE ORGANIZED AND THE PRODUCTS MADE AVAIL

TI8 40 RAPIDLY AS P ° SSIBLE '"-^'- Lippman ,n N. Y.

1 8 0

KEEP OUT OF THE WAR
Says Col. Charles A. Lindbergh

"We arc in danger of war today, not because European people have attempted to
interfere with the internal affairs of America, but because American people have attempted
to interfere with the internal affairs of Europe. Let us turn nur eyes to our own nation.
We cannot aid ethers until we have first placed our own country in a position of spiritual
and material leadership and strength.

A foreign power could not conquer us by dropping bombs in this country unless the
bombing were accompanied by an invading army ; and an invading army requires thousands
of small bombers and pursuit planes; ir would have little use for huge trans-Atlantic air¬
craft. The advantage lies with us, for great armies must still cross oceans by ship.

"Out danger in America is an internal danger. We need not fear a foreign invasion
unless American people bring it on through their awn meddling with affairs abroad. The
course we have been following in recent months leads to neither strength nor friendship
nor peace. It will leave us hated by victor and vanquished aiike. One side will claim we
aided its enemies; the other, that we did not help enough.

"Let us turn to America’s traditional role—that of building and guarding our own
destiny, Above all, let us stop this HYSTERICAL CHATTER OF CALAMITY AND
INVASION, If we desire peace, we need only stop asking for war. No one wishes to
attack us, and no one is in a position to do so:

"The only reason that we are in danger of becoming involved in this war is be¬
cause there are powerful elements in America who desire us to take pare. THEY REPRE¬
SENT A SMALL MINORITY OF THE PEOPLE. BUT THEY CONTROL MUCH OF
THE MACHINERY OF INFLUENCE AND PROPAGANDA. THEY SEIZE EVERY
OPPORTUNITY TO PUSH US CLOSER TO THE EDGE. IT IS TIME FOR THE
UNDERLYING CHARACTER OF THIS COUNTRY TO RISE AND STRIKE DOWN
THESE ELEMENTS.'—Col. Charles A. Lindbergh, Philadelphia Inquirer 5-20-40.

The inevitable first reaction to the above deadly parallel—The Question: WHO
wants war? is answered! Under date of Oct. 3, 1936. the following was broadcast: In a
pamphlet titled ''Twenty Years of Social Pioneering,” by the League of Industrial Dem¬
ocracy (Communistic), this appears: ''Walter Lippman organized the Harvard Socialist

Club."

DISCIPLES OF DISUNITY

The following was published July 8, 1940:

"Jews are the only cosmopolitan people. In this capacity they are ACTING
as a SOLVENT of national differences."—From The London Jewish World

2-9-38.

UNITY implies solidarity. SOLVENT means an element that dissolves,
disunites, disorganizes, separates.

The nationally known rabbi. Dr. Solomon Goldman, of Chicago, Presi¬
dent of the Zionist Organization of America, made the following accusation—
absolutely false so far as concerns the undersigned and his patriotic Jew-exposure
associates—in theN. Y. Times of July 1, 1940:

"In America, Anti-Semitism is the universal Fifth Column of Hitlerism.
HE WHO IS AN ANTI-SEMITE IS A HITLERITE!”

An "anti-Semite” is he who is against the Jew-Semite—not the Arab-
Semite. Let us get that race-duplicity clear. Let us also make it plain that patriots
who are anti-Jewish are not against Jews AS SUCH, but against what the Jew
Semites are DOING against The Republic and National Patriotism.

"HITLERISM” is the National Socialist Comprehensive Political Doctrine
adopted in Germany for government of The Reich. According to the rabbi’s
reverse-thinking, American vigilante patriots who are Anti-Jewish are therefore
advocates of Nazism FOR AMERICA. His biased comprehension seems to be
utterly incapable (?) of grasping the fact that the Jewish subversions in Ger¬
many which caused Hitler’s anti-Jewishness, repeated in America, were certain
to create here similar anti-Jewish reactions WITHOUT IN ANY WAY AB¬
SORBING THE OTHER MANY POLITICAL CONCEPTS OF THE NAZI
PARTY,

1 8 1

Zionist Leader Hcrzl admits in his "Jewish State" that wherever Jews go
in "perceptible numbers.” there also anti-Semitism invariably occurs. In other
words, Jewish intervention of itself causes anti-Jewishness.

Jews promote DISUNITY instead of National Unity, by refusing to assim¬
ilate and demanding special privilege, in violation of American political equality.

The reader might ask himself at this point, whether or not cosmopolitan
Jews, acting as a solvent, are promoting national disunity in the interest of
Internationalism.

"Jews are among the trusted leaders of all revolutionary parties” admitted
Rabbi Judah L. Magnus, of New York and Palestine, in the Jewish Forum of
February, 1919- "Disciples of Disunity?"

Jewish Editor M. J. Olgin. quoted in the Congressional Record (6-25-34) :
"There is only one way to abolish the capitalistic state and that is to smash it
by force! THAT MEANS CIVIL WAR!” Promoting Civil War is not productive
of National Unity.

Whose solidarity and unity were supremely manifested in the 1934 N. Y.
Siate gubernatorial election when the Democratic candidate was the Jew Lehman,
the Republican nominee the Jew Moses, the Socialist aspirant the jew Solomon,
and Communist candidate the Jew Amter?

Instead of promoting the UNITY they preach, the record above suggests
that Disciples of Disunity have been suicidally sowing an anti-racial hatred
againsc themselves.

SAVE THE REPUBLIC!

"THE PROCESSES OF DEMOCRACY"
vs.

THE PRINCIPLES OF THE REPUBLIC
(Edmondson Bulletin of July 22, 1940)

Following is a review of the illuminating "contents" of a 1918 booklet entitled "Back
to the Republic" by Atwood, in which he compaies "the process of democracy" with
the principles of a republic, and from which publication was lifted bodily a substantial
part of the U. S. Army Citizenship Training Manual of 1928, which has been suppressed
by New Dealer Roosevelt, Disciple of Democracy and Disunity, because it officially an¬
nounces that "The Government of the U. S. is NOT a democracy, but a REPUBLIC."

"The purpose of this book is to make clear the meanings of the words 'autocracy',
democracy' and republic' It is a startling statement, but an indisputable fact, that in
reviewing the centuries of history prior to • the founding of The Republic of the U. S. A.,
w-e find no country to which the historian can point and truthfully say: There was a
government that worked well. Following the adoption of the Constitution . . . there began
the first great era of progress guvernmentally that the world had ever known.

"Gradually, however, w-e began to modify our national government through the
appointment of boards and commissions, and the creation of various governmental
agencies, making it impossible for the government to function in accord with the Plan of
the Constitution. Demagogues and propagandists have kept up a constant campaign in
various states for the initiative, referendum, recall, socialistic doctrines and anarchistic
heresies.

"The men who established our government made a very marked distinction between a
'republic' and ’democracy,’ and said repeatedly and emphatically that they had founded
a republic. 11

Author Gertrude Atherton, in "The Conqueror," quotes Alexander Hamilton:
"Democracy is Poison!" Author Atwood reports him as saying: "The political principles
of the people of this country (The U. S. A.) would endure nothing but republican
government."

Atwood continues: "In an autocracy, authority is derived through heredity; in a
democracy, authority is derived through mass-meetings, the initiative, the referendum,
instructed delegates, or any other form of direct expression. In a republic, authority is
derived through the election by the people of public officials to represent them.

1 S 2

I’litr .utiiuJc of juiociucy towarJ property is feudaiistic. The attitude of democracy
toward property is communistic or socialistic. The attitude uf the republic toward property
is that of individual ownership, resulting in thrift, respect for law, individual rights, and
orderly, sensible economic procedure.

"The attitude of autocracy toward law, is that the will of the royal ruler shall
prevail; the attitude of democracy toward law is that the will of the majority shall prevail;
the attitude of the republic toward law is the administration of justice in accord with
fixed principles and established evidence-

"There is no such thing as a representative democracy. The very essence of democracy
is that the people speak direct. There is no such thing as a democratic republic. The very
essence of a republic is that the people speak through representativs. There is no such
thing as a democratic autocracy. Too little participation by the people, means autocracy:
too much participation by the people means democracy,

"The extreme or autocracy results in tyranny, oppression, reaction; the other extreme
of democracy results in demagogtsm, discontent, anarchy and chaos The Golden Mean of
a republic, strictly and literally adhered to, results in statesmanship, liberty, arbitration,
justice and progress. The Constitution provides for absolutely strict representative govern¬
ment, and gives the people no voice in the solution of governmental problems saving that
of electing representatives to work out the problems. It is a fundamental fact that the
people generally know comparatively little about governmental problems."

Author Atwood quotes from an address by Nicholas Murray Butler. President of
New York's Columbia University, before the Commercial Club of St. Louis, Nov. 2 ~,
iyu, published later under the title: "Why Should We Change Our Form of Govern¬
ment." in. which he said:

"There is under way a definite and determined movement to change our representa¬
tive republic into a socialistic democracy," The Central Conference of American Rabbis, in
a 1936 resolution, demanded that "a thoroughly socialized democracy" be substituted for
our republican form of government (See N. Y. Times 9-13-36).

Atwood defines "the initiative that phase of democracy which makes it possible
for the mob, under the leadership of the demagogue, to enact legislation; the referendum
is that phase of democracy which assumes that the minority should rescind impulsively at
a special election the deliberate'action of the majority at a regular election; the judicial
recall is that phase of democracy which makes it possible to rake a case from the court¬
room, where it may be decided in accordance with the law and the evidence, to the street
corners, where the agitators may appeal to passion and prejudice.

"Demagogues have substituted Personality for Principle, Preachment for Practice,
Pretense for Performance, Agitation for Achievement. Experiment for Execution and
Coercion tor the Constitution."

WALTER WINCHELL LIES
(Open Letter to Columnist Walter Winchell, July 15, 1940)

In your N. Y. Mirror of July 8, 1940, you give me some free advertising,
and I hereby write my thanks for the publicity because it is already bearing good
fruit for the Crusade against Jewish anti-Americanism even though apparently
published with smear-malice aforethought.

A respected western correspondent ironically writes: "We heard last Sun¬
day over the air waves kosher-America’s No. 1 mouthpiece, Walter Winchell.
Mr. and Mrs. America were hysterically warned about poisonous propaganda
emanating from the Pocono Mountains, around Stoddartsville, Penna. The
hill-billy press must be becoming effective when a national hook-up is used to
warn our innocent public about it. It must surely have attained significance.
Congratulations on your prominence!"

You report that I am much interested m stopping the firearms registration
bill before Congress, which you say would "DISARM many who have no reason
to carry guns." I’m glad you used that correct word "disarm," since it is omitted
from the measure.

There are several good reasons why I would not like to sec- the muonstitj-
tional gun-registration measure pass, among which is the fact that, it enacted, it

1 8 3

would enable Kiev Jews in government control-positions to frame citizens
md take away their rifles, pistols, etc., '-disarming" them, as you say, and leav¬
ing them defenseless when Jewish Communists are ready to try to seize The
Republic by force.

Said Communists don’t dare to act now. There are too many "White
Terror" vigilantes just around the corner protected by the keep and bear arms
right guaranteed by the Constitution.

You say Attorney-General Jackson has urged the bill as an aid to national
defense. What a farce: How would national defense be promoted by disarming
nationals—citizens—of The Republic.'’

You smearinglv allege that "This man Edmondson carries on his campaign
in Stoddartsville, Pa., BECAUSE in New York a few years ago he was indicted
by a Grand Jury on charges brought by Mayor LaGuardia and others. You
failed to tell the whole story.

It was' a Grand JEWRY that indicted the defendant, for two-thirds of the
personnel were Jews, headed bv a Jew foreman. You also neglected to mention
the fact that the false charge of "libel of all persons of the Jewish Religion was
unconditionally dismissed May 10, 1938, "in furtherance of justice.’

However for your information, primarily I came here for family health
reasons—justified by subsequent recovery. Fudlely waking in New York City
months after dismissal, ready to take on more Jews offering combat, I was very
glad to come to an American Gentile community, preferring such environment to
the New York Ghetto.

"The dear old American Civil Liberties Union went to Edmondson’s de¬
fense and saved him," you falsely comment. Roger N. Baldwin, Director of the
"dear old ACLU," wrote Sept. 18, 1936, to Judge N. W. Rogers of Tompkins
Corners, N. Y., saying:

"We have discussed very fully our attitude to the prosecution of Edmond¬
son We have conferred with his counsel, and looked up the law. When the
indictment was first brought it was, in our judgment, clearly a case violative
of the free speech guarantee, for, unlike ordinary criminal libel cases, it did not
specify persons libeled. The indictment was later changed to specific com¬
plaints, and thus the defect was cured." The matter was thereupon dropped by
the ACLU.

Defense Counsel John S. Wise, Jr., wrote Judge Rogers Oct. 1, 1936 say-
mo Baldwin had NOT conferred with him, as stated; and the religion indict¬
ment was NEVER CHANGED; which of course put Jewish Fellow-Traveler
Baldwin in the Ananias Club.

BUT, and here’s a big "but" because, becoming alarmed regarding its loose¬
ness, it then pleaded with the court for "dismissal of indictment because pro¬
secutions like this tend to restrict traditional freedom of speech and press.”
So much for the "dear old ACLU.’

But, watch your step, Wincbell, particularly in venturing to say that
"Edmondson is up to che same tricks which resulted in his indictment." I do
plead guiltv, however, to such "tricks" as truthfully exposing, through well-
documented power-publicity on a scale greater than ever before, how Jews arc
trying to destroy The Republic with their poisonous Communistic Democracy.

Now, any independent Gentile journalist would publish also this rebuttal,
but whoever heard of Walter Winchell in the role of a straight-shooter?

1 84

JEWISH INCOMPETENCE UNMASKED

"Jewish understanding does not look beyond today and tomorrow, operatin
destructively and suicidallv in ail directions. The Jewish mode of thinking i
inorganic, and is, for that reason, incapable of creative action. The Jew is un¬
able to conceive that the world dominion for which he is striving, would mean
simultaneous world ruin."—From the book "The Riddle of the Jews’ Success, '
a revelation of Materialism in Action.

Here is the record per Edmondson Bulletin of S-14-40) :

Jews achieved complete politico-economic mastery of rich Russia, througli
Trotsky, Kaganowitsch, Litvinoff, Zinoviev, Radek, Kamanev, Yaroslavsky et
al. What happened?-

RUSSIA WAS WRECKED!

Jews mastered Germany via Rathenau, Marx, Lassalle, Liebknecht, Eisner.
Haase, Preuss, Ballin et al. What happened?

GERMANY WAS WRECKED!

Jews gained control of Spain through Rosenberg, Bela Kun, Azana, and a
host of Soviet Jews. What happened?

SPAIN WAS WRECKED! (Jew-freed by Gentile Franco, Spain is grad¬
ually recovering through National Patriotism).

Jews moved into and dominated Poland, which they called "The Heart of
the Jewish Diaspora." What happened?

POLAND IS NO MORE! after being forced into war.

Jews mastered France through the Rothschilds, Blum, Mandel, Dreyfus.
Levy, Denain, Lazarus, et al., with their Secret Order of the Grand Orient.
What happened?

FRANCE HAS FALLEN!

Jews gained control of Rumania through King Carol’s mistress Lupescu.
What happened?

RUMANIA IS FINISHED!

Jews bored into and seized control of the wealth of the British Empire-
through Barney Barnato's African gold and diamonds, Sassoon's Oriental opium,
Disraeli’s Suez Canal grab, Lord Reading’s Indian-rule, Lord Melchett's nickel
monopoly, the Samuels, Waley-Cohens, Israel Moses Sieffs, Hore-Beiishas and
so on ad nauseum. What happens?

THE BRITISH EMPIRE IS BANKRUPT!

Jews have seized the U. S. Economic Dynamo of New York and the
Political Power Center of Washington, directing America’s destiny through
Baruch, Brandeis, Morgenthau, Lehman, LaGuardia, Goldenweiser, Strauss,
Sabath, Filene, Bullitt, Dickstein, Rosenman, Swope, Ezekiel, Margold, Hill¬
man, and thousands of others of the tribe in key-positions throughout the
Roosevelt Jew Deal administration. What is happening?

THE JEW DEAL IS WRECKING THE NATION THROUGH INEX¬
TINGUISHABLE DEBT AND WAR-MONGERING ACTIVITIES.

Zionist Leader Maurice Samuel, in his book "You Gentiles,” defiantly
confesses: "We Jews are destroyers even in those instruments of destruction to
which we turn for relief."

What an admission—not only of Gross Incompetence, but utter lack of
creative ability! Verily "Jewish thinking is inorganic, incapable of creative
action, operating destructively AND SUICIDALLY in all directions!"

185

oi'cri

"AMERICAN REPUBLIC MODEL BEST"

The following is a reprint from The Wilkes-Barre (Pn.) Record of August IT 19-10:

Complimentary to Boy Scout Camps in the Poconos. members; of the- summer colutiv
a; Stoddartsville, Per.na., were guests on Friday night of Misses Lulie- ,ukI l.,iui';i Stub
at their family homesteac, "The Maples," Robert Edwai-J Edmondscm, pub.ic relations
counsel of New York anc Pennsylvania was speaker, and a patriotic Hag salute was
featured.

Speaking on Save the Republic, Mr. Edmonsdnn said in pan.

"You scouts know that we Americans live in a Republic, but many ■>; mar fellow-
countrymen. misled by false internationalist propaganda, are calling die United States a
democracy under the impression that democracy mear.s tnc same as repub; ic. ’lou should
correct that idea.

"If you will look at your dictionary you will see that democracy is the opposi'e
extreme of autocracy, from which our forefathers who established this republic successfully-
freed themselves by revolution, to set up, not a democracy, but a republic.

"James Madison, one of the ablest of the framers of the United States Constitution,
during the time the great document was in process of formation, made the following
statement: "Democracies have ever been the scenes of turbulence and contention; have
ever been incompatible with personal security or right of property.'

"His compatriots agreed, and set up a constitutional republic, which is the golden
mean mid-way between the extremes of autocracy and democracy. The despotism or the
latter is often more ruthless than the tyranny of the former. The will of the majority
rules a democracy, whereas in our republic, justice is administered by fixed principles of
right which protect minorities as well as majorities.

"You will not find the word democracy in either the Declaration of Independence,
the United States Constitution, Washington's Farewell Address, or Lincoln's Gettysburg
classic-appeal to prevent government of, by and for the people from perishing. And the
U. S. War Department's Citizenship Training Manual of 1928 teaches American soldiers
that 'The Government of the U. S. is not a democracy but a republic! 1

"With the foregoing you should be able to convince any good American that we
live in a republic: but if further evidence is needed. I refer again to the dictionary, which
says that 'social democracy' was invented by the father of Communism, Karl Marx, and
his fellow-travelers.

"Article 4. Section 4, of the Constitution reads: 'The United States shall guarantee
to every state in this Union a republican form of government.’ Hence we are a compound
republic; and that is why the flag salute reads: I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the
U. S. of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation indivisible, with
liberty and justice for All.'

"Usurpers have sought to destroy our protective system of checks-and-balances by a
communizing process labeled democracy, In these days of peril we should be more on
guard than ever to protect traditional Americanism from alien labels and foreign
ideologies of ail kinds. The American model is unique and unlike other so-called re¬
publics, and it is the best government on earth. We should be prepared to defend it against
all comers."

COMMUNIZING U. S. BY STEALTH

The following was an Edmondson broadcast of September 17, 1940:

After being taken for a Hemisphere Ride, the so-called legal lights of the
American Bar Association convention in Philadelphia, were lectured by Jewish
Prof. K. Lowenstein of Amherst College as to how "American democracy”
should be saved from the fate of European democracies, through the adoption
of "comprehensive Federal legislation," as outlined in an article printed in the
N. Y. Times of Sept. 12, 1940, from which the following is taken:

"(1) Sharpening of provisions against sedition, sabotage and espionage.

"(2) Suspension and dissolution of ANTI-DEMOCRATIC parties,
groups and associations, even in the camouflaged form of cultural and social
activities. The 'dear and present danger' criterion of the U. S. Supreme Court
should be modified in that ANTI-DEMOCRATIC tendencies, or the structure
of a group, if authoritarian as to the election and control of its officials, should
be- deemed sufficient for REPRESSIVE MEASURES.

1 8 6

"(5) Prohibition of militarization ot political parties or groups, including
legislation against wearing of uniforms.

"(4) CURBING Of THE EXCESSIVE USE OF THE FREEDOM OF
PUBLIC EXPRESSION when used with malicious intent for disparaging
DEMOCRATIC institutions, or for incitement to hatred and contempt of some
classes of the population—Jews, bankers, freemasons, etc. Dissemination of-'
racial discord is always the forerunner of fifth-column activities.”

The foregoing recommendations of this Jewish leader to the American Bar
Association Convention are tantamount to an argument for the repeal of the
Bill of Rights, especially as regards Freedom of Speech and of The Press, with¬
out which free men cannot remain free.

PATRIOTIC APPEAL TO "CAPTAINS OF INDUSTRY"

Open Letter, October 1, 1940, from Robert Edward Edmondson to—
MESSRS.

Henry Ford, Detroit; Alfred P. Sloan, Jr., Chairman General Motors
Corpn.; M. J. Heinz, Chairman Heinz Pickle Co.; E. T. Weir, Prest. Weirton
Steel Co.; John Henry Kirby of Texas; George M. Moffett, Prest. Corn Pro¬
ducts Co.; J. Howard Pew, Jr., Prest. Sun Oil Co.; A. Atwater Kent, Prest.
Atwater-Kent Radio Co.; James F. Bell, Chairman General Mills Co.; Con¬
gressman John C. Schafer of Wisconsin; Senator Robert R. Reynolds of N. C.;
Raymond Pitcairn, Philadelphia.

Your names are smearingly mentioned as "American Merchants of Hate"
in the mushroom publicity organs of the Jewish Internationale. See "Friday' 1 of
Sept. 27, 1940. Don’t overlook "Fortune,” "Life," "Ken,” "Time” and others.

The root inspiration of the "American Merchants of Hate" title is found in
that insensate Hate with which the Champion Haters of History have been
inciting America into an emotional debauch to throw this nation into war
agamst the totalitarian states.

The time is fast approaching when outraged patriots will inevitably hale
Jewish character-assassination publications to court because monopolized publicity
has put its false Nazist, Fascist and Fifth Column smear-terms within the
jurisdiction of libel damage laws. For conviction on this legal point.read the
Penai Code of the State of New- York, wherein most of the offending magazines
Jive and have their being. Section 1340 provides:

"Any malicious publication . . . which exposes any living person to
HATRED, CONTEMPT, ridicule or obloquy, or tends to cause any person to
be shunned, or has a tendency to INJURE any person, is LIBEL.”

The above protective phrases of the Law of Libel can now obviously be
invoiced by yourselves and active Jew-exposure individuals also blacklisted—bv
"Friday,” viz. Gen. George Van Horn Moseley, Gen. Robert M, Brookfield,
Rev. Gerald B. Winrod, Rev, Charles E. Coughlin, Congressman Jacob Thorkel-
son, James True, George Deatherage, Col. H. A. Jung and many others
scandalously attacked.

"Friday” says chat Deatherage returned from the 1937 World Anti-Jew
Congress held in Europe—which I understand he did not attend—and de¬
livered "an important message to Robert Edward Edmondson, key-pamphleteer
of the Anti-Semitic Fifth Column." Deatherage never delivered any such
message to me.

187

The article goes on to say that "American anti-Semities are inseparably
linked with Nazi Germany"—which is untrue as regards my output. Since most
of such publicity documentation came from British and French politico-economic
sources, and is neither "racial" nor "religious’ 1 in character.

Neither is the Edmondson Agency "backed by some of the most powerful
and influential men in America'—I wish it were, since there is a limit at which
patience, as well as tolerance, ceases to be a virtue.

Men of Wealth: Do you want more concrete evidence of Jewish Treason
To The Republic? Here is revolution and war-confession documentation—

"The only way to induce the American President (Wilson) to come into
the war was to secure the co-operation of American Zionists by promising them
Palestine The Zionists carried out their part and helped to bring America into
the World War.’’—S. Landman, Jewish War Propaganda Agent of Britain
(See London Jewish Chronicle 2-7-36).

"Our propaganda will aim at attaching the support of important American
sections, such as the Jews. Our propagandists during the World War succeeded
in embroiling the U, S. with Germany." From "Propaganda m the Next War
book of 1939 by Sidney Rogerson, British subject.

"What Jewish Idealism and Jewish Discontent so powerfully contributed
to produce in Russia, the same historic qualities are tending to produce in other
countries."—American Hebrew 9-10-20.

"No agitators did more to bring in the German revolution of 1848 than
the two Jews, Heinrich Heine and Ludwig Borne. It was a Jew, Leon Trotsky,
who led the Red Army w'hich saved the Communist Cause in Russia. It was a
Jew, Karl Liebknecht' aided by a Jewess, Rosa Luxemburg, who led the
Spartacist Revolution in Germany. It was a Jew, Bela Kun, who set up the Red
Regime in Hungary."—From the book "How Odd of God,” by Former Rabbi
Lewis Browne.

"Jews are to be found among the trusted leaders and routine workers of
all revolutionary parties."—N. Y. Rabbi Judah L. Magnes, in Jewish Forum of
February, 1919-

"When we Jews sink, we become a revolutionary proletariat—officers of
all revolutionary parties; when we rise, there arises also our terrible power of
the purse. The Jewish Question is no more a social than a religious one. It is a
National Question, which can only be solved by making it a political world
question, The Jewish Question exists wherever Jews live in perceptible numbers.
We naturally move to those places where we are not persecuted, and there our
presence produces anti-Semitism."—From "The Jewish State by Theodor
Herzl, regarded as one of the greatest Jews.

"You have not begun to appreciate the real depth of our guilt. We have
taken your natural world, your ideals, your destiny and played havoc with them.
We are at the bottom, not merely of your last Great War, but nearly all your
wars. We have brought discord, confusion and frustration into your personal
and public life—We are still doing it; we did it with the irresistible might of
our spirit, with ideas AND PROPAGANDA."—From "The Real Case Against
the Jews" by Marcus Eli Ravage, Jewish author (January, 1928, Century
Magazine).

"We Jews are going to bring a war on Germany."—President David A.
Brown of the American Hebrew, predicted to Robert Edward Edmondson of
New York in the presence of witnesses, during the summer of 1934.

1 8 8

There js a Jewish Conspiracy against all nations ... a double assault of
Jewish revolution and Jewish finance.''—From La Vieille France, of June 15,
1929, widely quoted in British publications.

"We Jew's are destroyers, Jews will remain destroyers forever. Between
Gentiles and Jews there lies an unbridgeable gulf, It is abysmal. Nothing you
can do will meet our demands."—From the book "You Gentiles," by Zionist
Leader Maurice Samuel.

"WARS ARE JEWS' HARVESTS," says Prof. Werner Sombart, in his
"jews & Modern Capitalism" book.

While the documented Jewish confession-record is practically endless, I
rest my accusation-case here, since if you gentlemen are not converted to
defense-action by the foregoing "samples," it would be a waste of time to try to
move you to—RESCUE THE REPUBLIC! While its outer shell has rotted, its
blinded core is sound and worthy.

The Hour is Grave! And the Time of Decision is at hand!

MASS-CASE PROSECUTION GENERAL ALLEGATIONS

In an attempted, but futile justification of the indictment charges, the
mass-case prosecution declared that Defendant Edmondson’s publications con¬
tained the following "offenses:"

That President Roosevelt is a warmonger and a pawn of Jews and Com¬
munists and is draining dry the resources of the U. S. to save Communist
Russia and China.

That President Roosevelt is a Jew and is working with International
Jewry against the interests of the people of the U. S.

That public officials of the U. S. are controlled by Communists and
International Jews.

That acts of public officials are illegal, corrupt and traitorous, and in
violation of the U. S. Constitution.

That President Roosevelt forced the Axis powers to wage war on the U. S.

That war is the result of a Jew-sponsored monetary scheme to assure world
domination by International Jewry and Communists.

Admitting that some of the foregoing allegations were true in substance,
Defendant Edmondson states that his publications were all "addressed to the
American People" to inform them of danger, with honest belief in the truth
of the supporting matter published with the good motive of patriotic defense
of the U. S. against enemy action; and he prepared as rebuttal "exhibits" the
documented record below' with reasonable interpretations thereof.

"OVERT" SOCIALISTIC IMPLICATIONS
WHY ROOSEVELT IS UNFIT FOR RE-ELECTION
Following is an Edmondson Bulletin published February 12, 1940

(1) A Third Term would be un-American, according to tradition and precedent..

(2) FDR has overloaded the Nation with unprecedented and inextinguishable
National and State debt.

(3) He has usurped the constitutional functions of the Legislative and Judicial
Departments of Government.

(4) His Hull regime has broken down U. S. foreign trade and by "economic sanc¬
tions" has antagonized friendly nations.

(5) He has repudiated practically all platform pledges.

1 89

(6) He has subverted the American people with an enormous political bureaucracy.

( 7 ) He has Communistically regimented and Fasdstically centralized political
power.

(8) He has been repeatedly unntrutral in connection with the war in Europe.

(9) He. "recognized" the Soviet murder regime, and congratulated it on its
anniversaries.

(10) He has sociaiistically "packed" and Frankfurterized the U. S. Supreme Court.

(11) He has kept unemployment at peak during seven long lean years, raised the
cost of living to labor by crop destruction and wiped out working-capital by confiscatory
taxation.

(12) He has devalued our dollar, repudiated national contracts, and elevated alien
international Morgenthau interests to supreme domination of the U. S. Treasury and the
Federal Reserve Monetary System.

(13) He has violated the cardinal American principle of separation of Church and
State by calling for closer relationship between Religion and Government.

(14) He has regimented the press and censored radio free speech, in violation of
the American Bill of Rights.

(15) In deliberate suppression of American MAJORITY RIGHTS and to per¬
petuate his regime, he has created a powerful partisan "relief" and office-holding
MINORITY.

(16) He has selected more jews to fill influential positions than any previous
administration in American History," according to the Brooklyn Jewish Examiner of
Oct. 20, 1933.

(17) He has tried to convert The Republic into a rabbinical "thoroughly socialized
democracy." which is communistic.

(18) And in consideration of all these anti-American acts he has accepted three
medals for anti-American "Distinguished Services to Jewry.

"The strongest Third Term Roosevelt sentiment 1 found after a canvas of che Nation,
was among the Jewish group."—Columnist Raymond Clapper in N. Y. World Telegram
of February 2, 1940.

The Tennessee Valiev Authority enterprise was approved by President Roosevelt, May
IS. 1933, with David LiUenthal the Jewish Director, It has been pronounced by Socialist
Presidential Candidate Norman Thomas as die most socialistic of New Deal projects.

"The Rabbinical Assembly favors the general tendency of recently adopted SOCIAL
legislation, and in particular approves the scope of the TVA. IT ENDORSES THE
PRESIDENT'S PLAN FOR THE REORGANIZATION OF THE U. S. SUPREME
COURT."—Jewish "Day" May 11, 1931.

"ROOSEVELT," a 1938 book by Emil Ludwig (Jew), friend and admirer of Franklin
D. Roosevelt, says Roosevelt has been transforming the Republic of the U. S. A, into
"a semi-socialist state."

Roosevelt demanded that Congress pass the National Recovery Act. It did. Congress¬
man Louis T. McFadden, (Congressional Record of May 3, 1934) says NRA was che
socialistic "Freedom and Planning" scheme (PEP) of Britain conceived by Israel Moses
Sief, a Jewish merchant, and states that PEP was introduced to the New Deal by
Boston Jewish Merchant Edward A. Filene, who financed it until the U. S. Government
took it over. McFadden held PEP u> be directly opposed to the constitutional form of
government, and said it was The Jewish Plan of The ’World State.

"The underlying philosophy (socialistic) of the New Deal is the philosophy of
justice Louis D. Branded of the U. S. Supreme Court" reported the N. Y. Times of
June 28, 1934.

F.D.R. "Next Communist President"

"At the time of my visit to Russia the presidential campaign of 1932 was in full
swing. In many places in Russia I saw . . . pictures of Roosevelt entitled 'The Next
Communist President of the U. S.’ "—Carvech Wells, Fellow of the Royal Geographical
Society, member American Geographical Society, member of Explorers Club of N. Y.

"Communism is the Goal," is a statement made in the Harvard Class Book of
April, 1935. bv Roger Baldwin, National Director of the Frankfurter American Civil
Liberties Union, communist-aiding organization. He was outlining aims. The Penn, Dir¬
ector of the ACLU is quoted as having said that its program was adopted by the New
Deal Party.

"We challenge the present social system. We advocate SOCIALIZATION of basic
enterprises. There is only ONE way in which the American people can escape Fascism and

1 90

Communism and that is by establishing a THOROUGHLY SOCIALIZED DEM¬
OCRACY.”—Resolution by the great Central Conference of American Rabbis, reported by
N. Y. Times of Sept. 13. 1936. Roosevelt has continually praised the activities of this
rabbi conference, ■which, in turn, has endorsed most of his important policies.

William J. Goodman of N. Y. City, testified before the Senate Foreign Relations
Committee against neutrality revision, according to the Brooklyn Tablet of May 13, 1938.
He said: "We find ourselves, without any voice in the matter, lined up on the side of
Communism. There CAN be no communion with Communism on the part of the
American Republic.”

JuLy 5, 1935, President Roosevelt wrote to the Chairman of a sub-committee of the
House Ways & Means Committee relative to a socialistic pending bill: "I hope your
committee will not permit doubts as to CONSTITUTIONALITY, however reasonable, to
block the suggested legislation.” (See Congressional Record, Vol. 79, P. 14363)

''Step by Step, we have moved from being a Republic toward becoming an un¬
limited Democracy,”—Editorially said the Saturday Evening Post of Aug. 24, 1940, in an
analysis of democracy-promotion by the Roosevelt New Deal Administration.

Prof. Felix Frankfurter, born in Austria, widely known as Harvard's "Karl Marx
Professor,” (denounced in a letter of Dec. 19, 1917, as Bolshevistic, by President Theodore
Roosevelt) who was the most prominent member of the Communistic-aiding American
Civil Liberties Union, was appointed by President Franklin D. Roosevelt Jan. 5, 1939, as
a member of the U. S. Supreme Court, Associate Justice.

Roosevelt backed the Child Labor Admendmem to the Constitution, and supported
Jewish Governor Lehman of N. Y. and Jewish Governor Horner of Illinois in their at¬
tempts in 1934-35 to have state legislatures endorse it. The Communist Daily Worker
ardently advocated adoption. The amendment is "completely subversive of our form of
government~-it is socialistic,” declared Former Senator James A. Reed of Missouri.

"OUR GOVERNMENT IS A DEMOCRACY” declared President Roosevelt in his
Message to the Nation June 24, 1938. In December, 1938, he proclaimed "We are not
only the largest and most powerful democracy, but other democracies look to us for
leadership, rhat world democracy may survive. (N. Y. Times, Dec. 6, 1938).

"Our country is goin to be . . . THE ARSENAL OF DEMOCRACY” . . . From
a speech by Roosevelt before the White House Correspondents Association at a banquet
in Washington, at which he referred to the United States as "a democracy” seventeen
time. (N.Y. American, 3-16-40.)

The N, Y, World-Telegram Columnist Westbrook Pegler said Sept. 12, 1940: "Never
was a people so gulled as Americans by the word 'democracy.' Democracy contains the
process by which American freedom can be repealed utterly.”

On July 24, 1942, Roosevelt's Attorney-General in the Dept, of Justice, ordered ar¬
rested for seditious conspiracy under the Alien Registration Act of 1940, 28 men and
women who had been indicted July 21, 1942, by a Washington grand jury, for attacking
and exposing Communism and Jewish anti-Americanism.

"Democracy has failed, failed miserably; shown itself to be incompetent, fumbling,
too slow, too ignorant, too paralyzed by its own politics, a tragic victim'of internal
weakness."—Columnist Raymond Clapper, N. Y. World-Telegram June II, 1940.

The following points were advocated by New Deal Jewish Prof. K. Lowenstein, of
Amherst College, before the American Bar Assn., in Philadelphia Convention:—"Sharpen
the provisions against sedition; suspend anti-democratic groups; prohibit militant political
parties; CURB THE PRESS!"—N. Y. Times, Sept. 14, 1940.

In "Zionism Sc World Politics," Jewish Author Horace Meyer Kallen, says: "The
strongest authoritative voice of Internationalism is that of the Jew, Karl Marx (Com¬
munist); its most heroic practical defender, the Jew Ferdinand LaSalle (Socialist); its
unsung root, the economic doctrine of the Jew, David Lasser."

In December, 1940, "Opinion," Rabbi Wise’s monthly magazine, under a heading
"Jews Will Defend Democracy," James Waterman Wise, son of Rabbi S. S. Wise, Roose¬
velt partisan, writes as follows: "In one thing Hitler is right—WE JEWS ARE THE
ARCH-DEMOCRATS OF HISTORY."

In 1937 Roosevelt proposed to enlarge the U. S. Supreme Court. Syndicate Writer
Paul Mallon reported that the "packing plan" had been engineered by Roosevelt's "Right
Arm" and State Paper Composer N. Y. Supreme Court Justice Samuel I. Rosenman.

"Remove Army Officers’’

Prize-Winner Rabbi Victor Eppstein, in a contest on "The Best Way To Combat
Anti-Semitism," published by "Opinion," Rabbi Wise's monthly magazine of April, 1937,
made the following proposition: "American democracy must be SOCIALIZED. Energetic

191

measures must be adopted by strengthening the organization of labor and by system¬
atically REMOVING from key positions in ARMY AND NATIONAL GUARD ALL
OFFICERS WHOSE LOYALTY TO THE CONSTITUTION MAY BE QUALIFIED 3Y
CLASS ALLEGIANCE." Rabbi Wise has been a strong partisan of Roosevelt.

Roosevelt has repeatedly endorsed the communistic CIO, which was organized by the
Jews Sidney Hillman, David Dubinsky and Max Zantsky of N. Y. City. The N, Y, Times
of August 14, 193S, primed this from Washington, D. C.: "John P. Frey, Vice President,
American Federation Activities said today Communists hold many key positions in the
CIO. He listed 280 alleged Communists as holding such positions.

"In the fight against reaction the mobilizing of the Jewish people to defeat anti-
Semitism is an INTEGRAL part. We have organized a series of mass meetings, all of
which were held in synagogues with the active support of the rabbis."—From the "Party
Organizer" of the Central Committee of the Communist Party in the USA, June, 1938,
issue, New' Dealer partisan.

"Jews who deny that many Jews are Communists are jockeying themselves into the
position of citizens on tolerance. If, by taking full part in the forging of this united front
(against Fascism), the Jews of America write themselves down as COMMUNISTS—So
Be It!"—So wrote James Waterman Wise, son of Rabbi S. S. Wise, strong backer of
Roosevelt, in the Communistic "New Masses" Magazine of October 29. 1935.

"If the American Nation ever gets the idea that the Jewish race and Communism are
synonymous, there is the possibility of a pogrom in the U. S. that will make those of the
Czar's era look like a small parade."—James W. Gerard, formerly Ambassador from
the U. S. to Germany, as reported in the N. Y. Times of October 4, 1934.

The American Hebrew, F.D.R. partisan, Sept. 10. 1920. said: The Bolshevist Revolu¬
tion was largely the outcome of Jewish thinking and discontent. What Jewish Idealism
and discontent have so powerfully contributed to accomplish in Russia, the same historic
qualities of the Jewish mind and heart are tending to promote IN OTHER COUNTRIES."

London Jewish Savant Dr. Oscar Levy, in his preface to "The World Significance
of the Russian Revolution" by Put-Rivers, 1920, says: "Jewish elements provide the
driving force for both Communism and Capitalism."

British Author Hilaire Belloc in his 1923 book "The Jews" says: "The propaganda
of Communism throughout the world, in organization and direction, is in the hands of
Jewish agents."

"Social Democracy" or Communism, to use the Webster Dictionary definitions, was
organized by the Jew Karl Marx and the Jew Ferdinand Lassalle, in 1848; reorganized
in 1864; again in 1871 and put over in 1911-18 in Russia by Jewish revolutionaries.

That socialism is Jewish is made plain by N. H. Bialik, celebrated in Jewry as its
greatest poet, in an address at Hebrew University, Jerusalem, May 11, 1933, reproduced in
a Christian Church publication "Lines of Communication," in July, 1933; the following
description being employed by Bialik: "Judaism went forth into the great world. I once
compared it to an army going to war—a movable state. It is they who in principle are the
CREATORS OF LIBERALISM. DEMOCRACY. SOCIALISM AND COMMUNISM."

A booklet exposing Communism, entitled "America's Great Menace,” was circulated
in New York City in 1934 by B. A. M. Schapiro, who styled himself "A Christian by
Faith, a Jew by Race." In it he confessed: "I meet the communists in their hunting
grounds in Union Square, N. Y. City. "How will you start the revolution here?" I ask
them in their own language. "We Communists will work underground, and use the same
methods that brought about the Russian Revolution." The time has come when patriotic
Jews of America should feel the great responsibility for the evil deed (Communism)
hatched and planned IN THE CAMP OF ISRAEL."

"If the Jew wishes to survive he must identify himself with the historic movement
of Communism.”—Michael Alper, in Rabbi S. S. Wise's magazine "Opinion,” Nov., 1934.

N. Y. Jewish Mayor LaGuardia told delegates to the National Convention of the
Independent Order of Abraham m N. Y. City, according to the N. Y. American of June
8, 1937: "Many of the New Deal principles of government and economics were established
thousands of years ago in Mosaic and Talmudic Law.”

In the 1930 book "The Alien In Our Midst," by Charles Stewart Davison and
Madison Grant, the former, a prominent New York lawyer, said: "We were instituted
as a republic. Through steady increase of aliens we have dangerously verged toward mob-
rule—democracy. The theory of representative government is NOT a democratic theory It
is a republican theory. JT DENIES DEMOCRACY:”

1 9 2

In his 1918 book. "Back To The Republic,” Harry F, Atwood savs: "The attitude of
democracy toward property is communistic or socialistic. There js no such thing as a
democratic republic. The very essense of a republic is thar the people speak through
representatives.”

The public press reported President Roosevelt as saying to delegates to the 1940
National Democratic Convention in Chicago who asked for guidance: 'CLEAR IT WITH
SIDNEY!”—Referring to Sidney Hillman, Jewish President of the Amalgamated Clothing
Workers Union of New York City, notoriously "Red.’'

T see no inconsistency between the Philosophy of Communism and Principles of
Democratic Government."—Herbert Beniamin, Communist Leader of the Workers Alli¬
ance. Vol. i, Page 1;6. WPA Congressional Committee investigation. House of Repre¬
sentatives, /6th Congress, First Session.

ROOSEVELT NEW DEAL MONETARY SUBVERSIONS

Disregarding Art. l, Sec. 8. Par. 5, endowing Congress with the sole power to create
money "and regulate the value thereof,” President Roosevelt, on March 9. 1933, took tht
United States off the gold standard, relieving the Federal Reserve Banking System of its
obligation to pay out gold to United States Citizens BUT STILL PERMITTING INTER

NATIONAL FINANCIERS TO WITHDRAW' GOLD AND SHIP IT ABROAD_giving

a monopoly of the yellow- metal. On June 9, 1933. the gold payment clause in public and
private contracts was officially repudiated by the New Deal Administration, and with k
went national honor.

The Roosevelt Administration on Jan. 31, 19.34, in violation of Art. 1, Sec 8 Par 5
devalued the United States dollar from par to 59.06c to "counter inflation,” which is still
here. Later, a 2-billion dollar secret "Stabilization Fund” for manipulation of INTER¬
NATIONAL FINANCE was set up with the President and his Secretary of the Treasury
as Jewish dictators.

Washington Correspondent George Rothweli Brown wrote in the N. Y. American of
Tune 28, 1935: "The whole New Deal crazy quilt seems to have a distinct pattern once the
premise is accepted that astronomical expenditures have been made not for relief-public
works-recovery, BUT FOR THE DELIBERATE PURPOSE OF CREATING DEBT."

The Roosevelt New Deal regime raised the national debt of the United States from
twenty five to over two hundred million dollars in ten years. High authorities declare it
to be unpayable.

Arthur KitSOn, independent British economist, who denounced the gold standard
system, declared in the National Review of London, March, 1935, in an analysis of the
Jewish International Banking Monopoly, "The sole aim of the international financiers is
world-control by the creation of inextinguishable debt.”

The Jew Paul M. Warburg, was "Father of the Federal Reserve Bank System” of the
U. S. (See letter of Jan. 29, 1927, to N. Y. Post, by Jewish Prof. E. A. Seligman.) His
son James P. Warburg, international banker, was one of the first members of the
"Roosevelt Supreme Council” or Brain Trust. In this connection observe the following
from the American Hebrew Weekly of Sept. 10, 1920: "The Tew evolved organized
capitalism, with its working instrumentality, the banking system.”’

The following is from the Northampton, England, Daily Echo of March 19 1925-
"Jews can destroy empires by means of finance. Jews are Internationa], Control of credits
in this country is not in the hands of the English, but of Jews. It has become the biggest
danger the British Empire ever had to face.”—Statement bv Walter Crick British manu¬
facturer.

(Edmondson met Mr. Crick in New York in the early days of the patriotic crusade
Upon his request Mr. Crick sent for and obtained from England invaluable Jewish exposure
data for U. S. publication, including rare books, documents and other papers.)

Paul M. Warburg, born in Germany, practically controls the financial policy of the

wilson Administration,” wrote British Ambassador Spring-Rice on Nov. 13 , 1914_

adding: "Since J. P. Morgan, Sr., died, Jewish bankers are supreme in the U. S.”'

"There has not been an administration since our advent into the great World War
in which Bernard M. Baruch (Jewish speculator) has nor been a chief political, economic
and financial advisor—and every administration that listened to him has carried us
deeper and deeper into financial chaos.”—Chairman Louis T, McFadden of the House
Finance Committee, Congressional Record of June 2~>, 1934,

Read the fohowing from 1933 October "Fortune.” the Jewish tycoon magazine
Bernard M. Baruch is called into frequent conferences with the President. HE HAS

193

FINANCED manv a Congressional campaign; and is sum-untied by .1 praetorian guard
of senators. WHO HANG QN HIS EVERY WORD The rijiureot Baruch is sue ling
into enormous proportions on the horizon of public life. He 15 THh MibitKl ilAl\
of Washington and Wall Street."

If the foregoing record does not supply ample evidence of FDR >oci<ilist-coinmunist-
democracy-mone'tary conspiracy, what c.oesl

ROOSEVELT WARMONGERING

Gen. Hugh S, Johnson wrote in the Philadelphia Inquirer of June 18, 1940, solemnly
warning!—

"There is no longer any question that Mr. Roosevelt is exercising no effort whatever
to keep us out of war. It may not be Em to say that it is his purpose to exert every
effort within his supposedly limited powers to get us into war _Bii: at leas f sute _

ment is incontestable—EVERY ACT OF HRs IN THE PAbT THREE TEARS IS
CONSISTENT WITH SUCH A PURPOSE, AND NO ACT IS INCONSISTENT
THEREWITH."

This follows the report of the Financial Post of Toronto, Canada, pubiisned in its
issue of Jan. 27, 1940. after exhaustive investigation, and reading as follows;

"The business professional and financial leaders of the U. S. are DESPERATELY
afraid of war .hat 'would CONCENTRATE DICTATORIAL POWER IN THE HANDS
OF ROOSEVELT and his New Deal associates."

On Dec 10 1939 Roosevelt s Ambassador Joseph P. Kennedy to Great Britain,

made this statement, according to the 1940 World Almanac: "There is no reason, econ¬
omic financial or social, to justify the United States entering the war. This is NOT OUR
FIGHT!"

"The war now proposed is for the purpose of establishing Jewish Hegemony through¬
out the world."—Gen. George van Horn Most-ley, retired, U. S. Army, in the N. Y.
Herald-Tribune of March 29, 1939.

In a 1939 book entitled "Propaganda In The Next War, Sidney Rogerson, British
citizen made the following statement: "OUR propaganda will aim at attaching the
support of important sections, such as the jews. Our propaganda during the great war
(World War I), succeeded in embroiling the U. S. with Germany.

"American foreign policy is now more dangerous to world peace than any other
factor," reported its European correspondent Feb. 2V 1939. to the Saturday Evening
Post, warning that "more chan Hitler," European peoples fear the communist minorities
in the U. S.

The following is from Edmondson Bulletin of August 22, 1940:

"America is in danger. The destruction of the British Navy would be the turning
of our Atlantic Maginot Line. I am certain that if Great Britain is defeated, the attack
from Germany will come."—U. S. Jewish Ambassador Bullitt to France, Phiia. 8-10-40.

In 1940 President Franklin D. Roosevelt and Premier MacKenzie King of Canada
•oncbided "A Pact for the joint defense of the U. S. and Canada," and since tne
British Empire is at war and Canada is part of that Empire, then the Pact INVOLVES
THIS COUNTRY IN THE EUROPEAN CONFLICT BY BRINGING THE LATTER
TO THE WESTERN HEMISPHERE.

If the British fleet is going to consolidate with the American navy, HOW IS
GERMANY GOING TO INVADE THE U. S. WITH NO NAVY? Against WHOM
arc these 42,000,000 FDR regimented Americans going to fight? asked Edmondson.

The Dilling "Red Network" says: "The Tewish Press exults over Bullitt's mother
being Jewish" (The reason is probably found in this European statement: "According to
Jewish Law (Schulchan Aruk, Ebenaezer IV) the woman is the bearer of heredity.")

In the Philadephia Inquirer of Sept. 23. 1940, Columnist Paul Mallon writes: "Not
all defense money is going for defenses. The appropriations apparently are being stretched
to cover just about every phase of government activity under the sun, not the lease or
which is the re-election of Roosevelt. National Defense' is only the new neon sign of the
New Deal. It becomes plain that the socializing era is to proceed more expansively under
the new defense billions, and in step with progress toward war."

"American Jewry is engaged in two wars, one as part of a democratic government
anJ the other as part of a race on which Germany has been waging war," said N. Y.
Rabbi Abba Hillei Silver before a Texas audience, according to the Dallas Morning
News, April 1. 1940.

1 94

A Canadian audience was told by Rabbi M. L. Ptrlzweig. of Britain: "The Work!
Jewish Congress has been at war with Germany for seven years."—Toronto Evening
Teiegra.ni of Feb. 26, 1940. Did F. D. R. accept the suggestive-implication?

"We are at the bottom of nearly ail your wars. We did it solely with the irresistible
might of our spirit, with ideas and propaganda."—Marcus Eli Ravage. Jewish author, in
Century Magazine of January-February, 1928.

F. D. R. Advisor Henry Morgenthau mid a South Carolina audience Feb. 11, 1 9"y =..
that the U. S. is heading for another general war.—Portland Journal of Feb. 12, 1933.

On The Way To War

Senator D. Worth Clark of Idaho, on Feb. 24, J9-H, warned the Senate: "You
American people are tin your way to war. You are moving there in a turbulent cataract of
misinformation and heavily subsidized propaganda. Soon the Senate will make a declara¬
tion of war. It will not be called that. WE call it the Lend-Lease' Bill 1776," That bill
was proposed by Roosevelt.

"We Jews are going to BRING A WAR ON THE NAZIS," predicted President
David A. Brown, of the American Hebrew, New Deal Advisor, to Defendant Edmondson,
on May 25, 1934. ;n the presence of John T. Mills, Jr., an investment specialist of New
York City. Brown attacked Edmondson for criticizing F. D. R.

Was Brown’s prediction of war on Germany connected with the following statement
by Rabbi S. S. Wise nf N. Y. City, quoted in the N. Y. American of May 18, 1933.
namely: "I AM FOR WAR! We feel this is another of the great crises of Jewish Life."
He was referring to the Hitler disfranchisement of Jews in Germany,

John Haynes Holmes, pastor of the Community Church of New York, accused "the
Roosevelt Administration of conspiring to break down the people’s resolve to peace." He
said the myths used were that the nation was in danger of invasion; that Britain was

fighting America's battle, and that this war, like the last, was for 'Democracy' _N. Y.

Herald Tribune, March 10, 1941.

The Christian Century Pulpit, November, 1941, editorially said: "Steadily, and with
consummate skill, the- Washington Administration has pushed the nation to the brink of
war."

"The American people are being betrayed into the arms of their enemies by modern
Judases," declared Senator Wheeler of Montana before an American First meeting ac
Cincinnati. (N. Y. Herald-Tribune, April 4, 1941} denouncing Roosevelt foreign policies.

In the N. Y. Herald-Tribune of August 18, 1940, Republican Presidential Candidate
Willkie, in his acceptance speech, declared: "The President’s attacks on foreign powers
have been dangerous. He has dabbled in inflammatory statements and manufactured panics.
He has courted a war . . . which the country emphatically does not want."

Roosevelt sent fifty American destroyers Sept. 5, 1940, to Britain for use in its war,
and later arranged for "air bases" in British possessions.

The N. Y. Times of June 21, 1940, announced that Roosevelt had put the defense-
conscription regimentation of American youth in charge of the Socialist Sidney Hillman,
foreign-born Jewish President of the Red Amalgamated Clothing Workers Union o:
N. Y. City—which act caused Democratic Congressman Cox of Georgia to ejaculate
"God Save The Republic!"

The following is published in the N. Y. World-Telegram of Sept. 9, 1940, under the
by-line of Journalist William Philip Simms, purporting to be THE PLAN to drag the
United States into the war with Germany:

"Peace or war for the U. S., in the view of shrewd diplomatic observers, hangs
on the outcome of the Battle of Britain. Should the Nazis succeed in invading England,
the government, headed by what H. G. Wells calls our Anglo-American Prime Ministei
Winston Churchill.' will most certainly shift its seat to Canada. Churchill has already-
said as much.

"The possibility of this shift is said to be one of the main reasons why London so
readily swapped naval and air bases in the Western Atlantic for 50 of our destroyers. It
was certainly behind the British pledge not to surrender or scuttle their fleet in the event
of defeat.

The inevitable result of this, in the opinion of competent diplomatist*: WOULD BE
TO BRING THE EUROPEAN WAR TO THIS COUNTRY; for the U.’s. is not only
bound by the 117-year old Monroe Doctrine to guard this hemisphere from foreign
aggression, but now that it shares Atlantic naval and air bases with Britain, those bases
will have to be defended.

195

"Than all classes of British people now share this view is no secret. Some are too
diplomatic to say so for publication, but others are less discreet.

In 1941-2, Charles Michaelson, Jewish Director of Publicity for the Democratic
National Committee, reportedly gave a complete picture of the New Deal Plan to enter
the war. in circulars printed and issued from Washington during 1941-2.

Observe the following significant quotation from the Chicago Jewisn Sentinel of
Oct 8 19^- “THE SECOND WORLD WAR IS BEING FOUGHT FOR THE

DEFENSE OF THE FUNDAMENTALS OF JUDAISM." Not for Christian Americanism-!
For JEWISH survival!

"... We did not go to war because we were attacked at Pearl Harbor . . . We
were attacked at Pearl Harbor because WE HAD GONE TO W'AR WHEN WE MADE
THE LEND-LEASE DECLARATION. That declaration was an affirmative act on our
part AND A WARLIKE ACT."—N. Y. Times Publisher Arthur Hays Sulzburger (Jew),
in 'Washington Times-Hc-rald. Feb. 1, 1944.

If the foregoing "overt" record does not show Roosevelt warmongering at Jewish
instigation, what does it imply?

• ROOSEVELT JEWISH ANCESTRY RECORD

Seditious conspiracy case ''Prosecutor John Rogge disclosed that Robert
Edward Edmondson, defendant, will be prosecuted for distributing documents
describing President Roosevelt as a Jew, carrying the implication that he got the
country into war to help fellow-Jews.” Prom the Washington Times-Herald,
March' 30, 1943.

Whereupon Defendant Edmondson prepared the below documented "overt
evidence" as a court "exhibit."

The following is from "The Revealc-r,” (10-15-36), Editor G. B. Winrod,
of Wichita, Kansas, which published a Roosevelt family genealogical chart pre¬
pared by the Carnegie Institute of Washington, D, C, as reported by the Daily
Citizen of Tucson, Arizona, The Times of St. Petersburg, Florida, and the Star
of Washington, D. C. It was reproduced in an Oct. 20, 1936, Edmondson
Bulletin Reprint—

Famous Sons of Famous Fathers — The Roosevelts

The chart lias come as a shocking revelation to millions of American
Citizens, It convinces as to the President’s Jewish ancestry.

From the viewpoint of eugenics, it explains his natural bent toward
radicalism. It shows why he has given hundreds of so-called Liberals, Socialists
and Communists powerful positions in the national Government. It proves
unmistakably that the Roosevelt Administration offers a biological as well as a
political problem.

The New York Times of March l4> 1935, quotes the President as saying:
"In the distant past my ancestors may have been Jews. All I know about the
origin of the Roosevelt family is that they are apparently descended from Claes
Martenszen van Roosevelt, who came from Holland.”

197

Additional information regarding the nationality of the Roosevelt family,
was given by Chase S. Osborn, early in 1934, at Sc. _ Petersburg, Florida. Mr.
Osborn was formerly Governor of Michigan. The leading newspaper of the city
(The Times) earned the following report after the interview:

"Although a Republican, the former Governor has a sincere regard for
President Roosevelt and his policies. He referred to the Jewish ancestry' olHhe
President, explaining how he is a descendant of the Rossocampo family expelled
from Spain in 1620. Seeking safery in Germany, Holland anu other countries,
members of the family, he said, changed their name to Roseberg, Rosenbaum,
Rosenblum, Rosenvelt and Rosenthal.

"The Rosenvdts in north Holland finally became Roosevelt, soon becoming
apostates with the first generation and others following suit until, in the fourth
generation, a little storekeeper by the name of jacobus Roosevelt was the only
one who remained true to HIS JEWISH FAITH. It is because of this Jewish
ancestry, former Governor Osborn said, that President Roosevelt has the trend
of economic safety (?) in his veins."

The radical movement which is sweeping the world today, causing the
foundations of organized society to crumble, is a Jewish movement. Whether
it is the First Communist Manifesto, written by the Jew Karl Marx, in 1648—
or a Moscow dictatorship, set up eighteen years ago; composed of 545 leaders,
of -whom 44? were jews—or a Jewish banking concern in Wall Street depositing
money to the credit of Lenin and Trotsky in a sister bank in Sweden—or a
Communist regime in France, headed by the Jew, Leon Blum—or a Spanish
revolution, precipitated by a Jew named Bela Kun, or a subversive Brain Trust
carrying the nation toward the red abyss of Bolshevism ... the radical program
is today, and always has been, primarily A JEWISH PROGRAM.

Roosevelt inc-vitably draws upon his Semitic ancestry. It is, therefore, as
natural for him to be a radical, as it is for others to be true Americans. This
is why he can boast of flouting conventionalities, and publicly gloat over des¬
troying those traditions which arc fundamental to our national character. HE
IS NOT ONE OF USi This may also explain why he has no hestitation in break¬
ing his promises (Kol Nidre Oath—Prayer Repudiation?)

It is to be doubted if he, himself, understands the inner forces that surge
through his being, driving him further and further toward the Left! It’s in his
blood! Meanwhile, the resuli of 160 years' constructive effort on the part of
Christian patriots threatens to be swept away.

For this reason, one of his official acts after becoming President, was to
invite Finkelstein, alias Litvinoff, to the White House for the purpose of
establishing diplomatic relations with the Jewish dictatorship of Moscow. For
this reason, he has appointed Jewish Ambassadors to such strategic diplomatic
posts as Paris. Stockholm and Moscow. For this reason, Bernard Baruch has been
called "the unofficial President of the United States.”

For this reason, a super-cabinet, known as the "Brain Trust," an organiza¬
tion of appointees dominated by powerful Jewish intellects, has been set up to
usurp constitutional powers of our duly elected lawmakers.

We do not condemn Roosevelt for coming from Jewish stock. We con¬
demn him for being a leader in the international radical movement which is
throwing Gentile governments into convulsions.

If the Jew's were living as an independent nation in their homeland
(Palestine) today, it wrnuld be a mistake for a Gentile to rule over them.

In like manner, the Semitic mind is incapable of assimilating the Christian
and American viewpoints sufficiently to risk placing the destiny of 120,000,000
human beings in the hands of a few members of their race.

(End of reprint).

1 9 8

Ancestry In Politics

Liberation Magazine of Nov. 14, 1940, reprints the following October,
editorial from the Macon, Ga., Telegraph:

"A few days ago we commended editorially Edward J. Flynn, Chairman
of the National Democratic Committee, for hts repudiation and denunciation of
the pamphlet unknown persons had circulated about Mendel Willkie s German
ancestry In the matter of racial lines Mr. Roosevelt might come into the picture

on the basis of his ancestry. ,

”Ex Gov. Chase S. Osborn of Michigan—and Poulan, Ga.,—was quoted
as having said that he inquired of President Roosevelt as to his nationality, and
that MrT Roosevelt wrote in reply that his earliest ancestor of record was a
Spanish Jew, who left that country under one of the inquisitions, and went to
Holland as Rosefeld or a similar name; that the offspring eventually developed
the name into Rosenfeldt and then Roosevelt.

"Having seen something like the above in print, and it having been
credited to Gov. Osborn and Mr. Roosevelt, I wrote to Gov. Osborn and asked
him what he had learned conclusively as to Mr. Roosevelt's ancestry. Gov.
Osborn wrote that President Roosevelt is a half Jew; his wife is A FULL

JEWESS.’ ” , . r TT c

In the 1938 "World Almanac" under the heading Biographies ot U. S.
Presidents and Their Wives," page 237, appears this: "Franklin Delano Roose¬
velt was the son of James Roosevelt, a direct descendant of Claes Martenzen van
ROSENVELT, who arrived in New Amsterdam in 1649 and married Jannetje
SAMUELS."

The following is from "The House of Roosevelt" by Paul Haber, 1936
edition, "Claes Rosenvelt entered the clothing business in New York, and was
married in 1682. He accumulated a fortune. He then changed his name to
Nicholas Rosenvelt. Of his four sons, Isaac died young. Nicholas married Sarah

Solomons. .

New York Jews having designed and struck off a medal with the head ot
Roosevelt on one side and’the sixpoint Solomon Star, synagogue symbol of
possession and world power, on the other, with a mystical so-called Good
Luck" idiom in the center of the star, Edmondson and his associates investigated
to ascertain the significance, if any, and report these implications:

"Good Luck and Wisdom to Franklin D. Roosevelt, our Modern Moses,
Leading Jewry in 'The Promised Land' (America) under the 'Seal of Solomon.' "

Writing in the "Hakenkreuzbanner" of May 1-1, 1939, Prof. Dr. Johann
von Leers of Berlin-Dahlem, Germany, publishes an exhaustive analysis of
Roosevelt s ancestry. A new discovery is quoted to show that President Franklin
Delano Roosevelt’s mother—Sarah Delano—is from a Jewish-blood family.

Comments Dr. von Leers: "Schmalix (genealogist) writes: 'In the seventh
generation we see the mother of Franklin Delano Roosevelt as being of Jewish
descent. The Delanos are descendants of an Italian or Spanish Jewish family—
Dilano, Dilan, Dillano. ’

"According to Jewish Law (Schulchan Aruk, Ebenaezer IV) the woman is
the bearer of the heredity. That means: children of a full-blooded Jewess and
a Christian are, according to Jewish Law, JEWS.

"We can understand why Jewish associations call him the 'New Moses;'
why he gets Jewish medals—highest orders of the Jewish people. For every
Jew who is acquainted with the law, he is evidently one of them.

With this Jewish Delano descent added to the other records herein and
New York Jews on the East Side constantly referring to the President proudly as
"Rosenvelt,” it would seem that Dr. von Leers is justified in exclaiming:

199

"It being true that che Delanos are well-known Jews President Roosevelt is,
from the standpoint of Jewish Heredity Law, AS GOOD A JE^fr AS BER¬
NARD M. BARUCH."

The Washington Star of Feb. 29, 1936 (Seen in Library of Congress)
published a Roosevelt Family Tree, showing his descent from the Holland
Rosenvelts.

In an elaborate book entitled "Young America’s Story of Franklin D.
Roosevelt, Man of Action," 1933 edition, by Jewish Authors Lowitz &
Sadybeth (N. Y, Public Library), published by Doubleday, Doran & Co., N. Y.
City, ROOSEVELT'S JEWISH ANCESTRY is indicated. On Page 3 the
statement is made: 'In 1644 Claes Martensohn van Rosenvelt with his wife
Janette, stowed their belongings in a westbound ship, and bid farewell to the
little village in Zeeland, Holland. Rosevelt means field of roses.' ’

F.D.R. Reared by Baruch

"When FDR was introducing Mme. Chiang Kai-sbeck to some of his
ffiends he said: 'This is Bernard M. Baruch. Bernie s raised me for about
thirty years.' Baruch countered: 'And don’t you think I ve done a pretty good
job of it?’ "—From the Drew' Pearson column of the Washington Post ot
March 26, 1943, Jewish Publisher Eugene Meyer, Jr.

The Jewish Sentinel of Chicago, of Sept. 15, 1938, reported "Young Judea
has inscribed in the 'HEBREW Children s Golden Book the name of President
Roosevelt’s grandchild FDR 3rd. President Roosevelt's NAME has already been
inscribed in the Golden Book."

"All I know about the origin of the Roosevelt family in this country is
that all branches bearing that name were apparently descended from Claes
Martenssen van Roosevelt who came from Holland. In the distant past they may
have been Jews."—Letter from President Franklin D. Roosevelt printed in the
Detroit Jewish Chronicle, as reported in the N. Y. Times of March 15, 1935.

"Many of the New Deal principles of government and economics were
established thousands of years ago m Mosaic and Talmudic Law, Jewish Mayor
LaGuardia told 150 delegates at the National Convention of B'nai B’rith in
N, Y. City.—N. Y. American of June 8, 1937.

"An appeal that Jews co-opcrate with President Roosevelt because his ideals
are identical with those of the ancient Hebrew prophets, was made by Rabbi
S. H. Goidenson in his sermon yesterday," said the Jewish Daily Bulletin of
March 12, 1934.

"A Kinship is to be found between the aims which he (President Roose-
vdc) exemplifies and the purpose for which the B'nai B'rith carries on,"—
quotation from Jewish Governor Horner-Levy of Illinois, published in the
monthly magazine of B’nai B’rith, April, 1934, largest International Order
of Jews in the world.

"Roosevelt’s Supreme Council, ’ or Brain Trust, as ic was called, in¬
cluded U. S. Supreme Court Jewish Justice Louis D. Brandeis, "Father of the
New Deal," contributor to the Communistic Commonwealth College of Mena,
Ark.; Bernard M. Baruch, "Unofficial President," self-confessed Wall St.,
speculator and International Financier; U. S. Supreme Court Justice Felix
Frankfurter, "Legal Master-Mind of the New Deal," Harvard’s so-called "Karl
Marx ProfessorHenry Morgenthau, Jr., Secretary of the Treasury; Judge
Samuel I. Rosenman, "Roosevelt’s Right Arm," Founder and Head of the
Brain Trust and writer of Roosevelt's State Papers; Gov. H. H. Lehman of
New York; Sidney Hillman, Labor Advisor; James P. Warburg, son of Paul
M. Warburg, "Father of the Federal Reserve System." (From Brooklyn Jewish
Examiner of October 20, 1933).

200

The following New York item was published under an Associated Press
date line of May 8 1937; "President Roosevelt will receive the tenth award of
the Gottheil Medal for '"DISTINGUISHED SERVICES TO JEWRY."

American Newspaper Sydicate Writer Paul Mallon wrote Feb. 7, 1937:

' The man behind the repacking process (of the U. S. Supreme Court) was
Samuel I. Rosenman, N, Y, State Justice, little known but close friend of the
President."

’"The underlying philosophy of the New Deal is the philosophy of justice
Dembitz Brandeis of the U. S. Supreme Court; the NRA is almost a composite
of his dissenting opinions." (From Jewish-owned N, Y. Times of June 28,
1934.)

Gen. Hugh S. Johnson in the Chicago Tribune of June 28, 1934: ' During
this whole intense experience (formation of the NRA, later held unconstitu¬
tional), i have been in constant touch with Judge Brandeis."

"More than any other one person, Felix Frankfurter is the legal master-mind
of the New Deal," say Simon & Schuster, Jewish publishers of their 1934 edition
of the Roosevelt 'New Dealers,’ "Frankfurter men are established in key posts
throughout the Administration."

"Karl Marx" Prof. Frankfurter was referred to thus by Gen. Hugh John¬
son in the Saturday Evening Post of Oct. 26, 193 5: "He has more influence than
any other single individual in the U. S.”

The N. Y. Herald-Tribune reported: Max Bedacht of N. Y. City, repre¬
senting the Communist Party, ac the Ways A Means Committee hearing April
2, 1936, strongly approved the Roosevelt Administration plan to tax undivided
surpluses, saying "this type of levy has been contained in the platform of the
Communist Party for many years."

"The Bolshevist Revolution was LARGELY the outcome of Jewish thought
and discontent; what Jewish idealism so powerfully contributed to accomplish
in Russia, the same historic qualities of the Jewish mind ARE TENDING TO
PROMOTE IN OTHER COUNTRIES." The foregoing appeared in the
American Hebrew of Sept. 10, 1920, and the following is from the London
Jewish Chronicle of April 4, 1919: "The Ideals of Bolshevism are at many
points CONSONANT with the finest Ideals of Judaism."

Roosevelt was awarded the American Hebrew Medal for "Distinguished
Services to Jewry."—Washington Times-Herald March 6, 1946.

Judge Julian W. Mack, N. Y. City Jewish "legal light," in a 1933 book by
Jewish Author Jessie Sampter, entitled "Modern Palestine" told a Zionist Con¬
ference: "Beyond question, NINE-TENTHS of the Jews of America are
Zionists."

"In Democracy alone is the hope of the Jew,"—President Alfred M. Cohen
of the International B’nai B’rith, in the N. Y. Herald-Tribune of May 9, 1938.
And then President Roosevelt vociferated later: "We are not only, the largest
and most powerful DEMOCRACY, but other democracies look to us for leader¬
ship." (N. Y. Times of Dec. 6, 1938).

New York Rabbi David de Sola Pool, friend of Roosevelt, made the follow¬
ing harmonious comment in the N. Y. Times of Oct. 22, 1939: The United
States has been built up into a GREAT RESERVOIR OF DEMOCRACY."

Rabbi Israel M. Goldman wrote in the American Hebrew Weekly of Nov.
3, 1939: "We as Jews are certain that Judaism (which is religion’) and

20 1

Democracy (which is politics’) are INSEPARABLE.” In the N. Y. Times of
Dec. 24 1939, shortly thereafter, we read this from Roosevelt’s "peace letter to

the Pope:”_"It is well that we encourage a closer association between those

in religion and those in government.” American fundamentals require separation
of Church and State.

Roosevelt warned Congress in a 1942 Message "We must be particularly
vigilant against racial discrimination,” referring to Hitler persecution of Jews.
(Wisconsin Jewish Chronicle of Jan. l6, 1942).

"Non-Jewish officials in the Government, acting under direction of the
President, are trying to get various agencies to employ more Jews”—Readers
Digest for September, 1942, article by Klipinger.

End of Franklin Delano Roosevelt's ancestral record, carrying conviction
into all except closed minds, that he was Jewish.

"OVERT ACTS” OF ROOSEVELT CONSPIRACY AGAINST
EDMONDSON ET AL

"I wish to disclaim, on behalf of the Government, any intention of prose¬
cuting defendants because they criticized the President and the New Deal. They
may criticize the President and the New Deal to their heart’s content. We desire
ONLY to prosecute for statements which interfered with the WAR EFFORT.’’

The foregoing statement was made by Department of Justice Prosecutor
Ewing in N. Y. Times, July 29, 1942.

Compare that with this: "Mass-Case Prosecutor Rogge disclosed today that
Defendant Edmondson will be prosecuted for distributing documents describing
President Roosevelt as a Jew."—Washington Times-Herald, March 30, 1943.
No U.S. law makes it a crime to call anybody a Jew-. Edmondson exercised his
free speech right to "criticize the President to his heart’s content.

Robert Edward Edmondson was charged by the seditious conspiracy prose-
’cntion with interfering with the war effort and giving aid and comfort to
enemies of the U. S. (Per 1944 indictment.)

He stopped publication and retired from all publicity activity Nov. 30 ,
1940, more than a year before the U. S. entered war against the Axis Powers.
Before indictment he was known to the prosecution as having done so because
in February, 1943, in the presence of witnesses, Asst. Prosecutor Burns said
to him: "We were sorry to learn that you had stopped publication Nov, 30,
1940. because we hate to lose a defendant."

In further specific support of the charge that the Roosevelt New Deal
Administration criminally conspired to Cake away defendant Edmondson s con¬
stitutional rights, note that in February, 1943, the Department of Justice
voluntarily returned to this defendant over 90 c /c of papers seized in his home
without a search warrant, (as required by the U. S. Constitution), among which
were 117 bulletin publications each bearing the 1942 signature endorsement
of the seizing officer, which documents contained 1297 PRO-American-IN-
TENT expressions, and many ANTI-Nazi statements.

"The Pathfinder,” printed in Washington, carried in its July 24, 1944,
issue, the following statement from Arthur Garfield Hays, Chief Counsel of
the American Civil Liberties Unicn, being an extract from his denunciation
therein of the mass-trial procedure:

20 2

"I am particularly opposed to a situation where, in time of war men arc
tried because of statements made in time of peace. Those utterances may have
meant quite different things in the setting of peace. Whatever the court may
charge, ic is impossible for'a jury at the present time to fit those words into the
background in which they were said.” •

In Cramer vs. U. S., the U. S.^ Supreme Court ruled April 23, 1945:
"Evidence relates statements by Cramer before the U. S. was at war with
Germany. At the time they were uttered, however, they were not treasonable.
To use pre-war expressions of opposition to entering a war to convict of treason
during the war, is a dangerous procedure. '

In the document issued by President Roosevelt Sept. 9, 1939, 'Proclaiming
the Neutrality of the United States in the War between Germany and England,
I-'rance, Poland, etc,” was the following:

"The treaties of the U. S. require that no person within the jurisdiction of
the U. S. shall take part in said war but shall remain at peace with all of said
belligerents;” warning that any citizen who may "misconduct ’ himself does so
"at his peril.”

Congress did not declare war on Germany until Dec. 11, 1941, after de¬
claring war on japan on Dec. 3, 1941, and the President did not theretofore
''proclaim” that the U. S. was "at war,” although he asked for "war power" as
below, but did not receive such authority.

The N. Y. World-Telegram of Jan. 3, 1940, quoted Secretary of the Navy
Edison as asking Congress "to vest in the President during the national
emergency those powers which he has in time of war;’’ showing that the Nation
was then "in time of peace;” not yet making any "war effort,” and was defin¬
itely still in a "national emergency" status, and "at peace."

The line of free press demarcation between peace time and war time is
dearly drawn in the Dec. 21, 1941, issue of the N. Y. Times, by the following
statement of Washington Correspondent Arthur Krock:

"Freedom of the press in the U. S., guaranteed in time of peace by the
first article of the Bill of Rights but clearly incompatible with national security
in time of war, officially ended Dec. 18, 1941, when the President signed the
revived War Powers Act of 1917.”

That the Roosevelt New Deal Administration promoted a plot against
defendants in the seditious conspiracy case to cover up its Own treason is indi¬
cated by the following evidence, which it actually had in its possession prior to
indictments.

The 1942 United States State Dept, book entitled "National Socialism”
admitted that "it was impossible to adduce any direct statements” in Nazi
literature or speeches indicating that domination of the world was a Nazi aim—
yet in the indictment against defendants it charged they had joined such a
world wide conspiracy.

The high-grade British magazine " 19 th Cencury & After" of September,
1943, reproduced in the Congressional Record, stated that the Nazi aim was not
world domination, but that Germany wanted to be a world, power like Britain.

The 1945 report of U. S. Army Chief of Staff Gen. George Marshall said
no evidence had been found of any "over-all strategy” by the German High
Command, without which there could have been no worldwide Nazi con¬
spiracy, as alleged in the indictment.

Defendant Edmondson is a stenographer. On Sept. 19. 1944, he reported
the following testimony in the seditious conspiracy trial as given by Prosecution
Witness Teller, on Ambassador Dodd's staff:

203

■’You were in Germany during the time Ambassador Dodd was there'”

"Yes. From 1924 to 1941."

"While in Germany did you ever hear of a 'publicly announced program
by Nazi leaders to overthrow the United States Government and put Nacional
Socialism in its place?” ’ (Prosecution allegation)

''No."

Prosecution Witnesses Gissibl and Luedtke likewise testified that they had
never heard of such a conspiracy program.

Under the heading "Sedition Case Framed by Pseudo G-Men,’’ the
Washington Times-Herald of Feb. 26, 1944, published the following:

"The powerful U. S. Department of Justice . . . under New Deal com¬
pulsion—allowed a particularly vicious amateur, Eugene Meyers, Jr. (Jew),
Publisher of the Washington Post, to FRAME-UP a case against a group
of alleged Nazi agents, whom the Post accused of seditious activities imperiling
the morale of soldiers and sailors . . .

"In framing Federal indictments against defendants one of Meyers’ re¬
porters acted as agent provocateur to try to entrap obscure pamphleteers and
anti-semites into an 'overt act’ in the District of Columbia, so that they could
be tried here in this Government dominated community.

"In this capacity Meyers’ Reporter Dillard Stokes posed as fictitious
Jefferson Breem, 3917 Penna. Ave., S. E.; and also as Adam Quigley, P, O.
Box 219, Ben Franklin Station, Washington, D. C.

"The Post reporter, breathing a plausible degree of anti-Semitism, wrote
to numerous agitators seeking samples of their outgivings. Five took the bait
and found themselves indicted for the 'overt' act of causing to be delivered to
the Washington Post Office copies of their propaganda. Working closely with
E he Meyer sleuths was Justice Department Assistant Attorney General Maloney."

The foregoing is confirmed on Page 29 of "The Sedition Case (1953) in
Congressional documentation.

Below is another piece of "overt evidence" indicating that the Roosevelt
Administration conspired to victimize Defendant Edmondson.

The indictment of Jan. 3. 1944, was challenged at trial by Defense Counsel
Lindas, as reported in the shorthand testimony of proceedings on Page 9315.
He pointed out that the law on which the seditious conspiracy charges are based
was passed June 28, 1940. "If a statement by an alleged co-conspirator is to
be used against anybody it must be after the conspiracy has been formed.

"How can a conspiracy be formed to violate a law UNTIL THERE IS A
LAW? Therefore, anything that he or any one else says is only hearsay as far
as my client is concerned because there are no CO-CONSPIRATORS UNTIL
THERE IS A LAW TO VIOLATE.

"In Other words, if Mr. Jones says something that might show an intention
on his part to violate something, as far as my client is concerned it is only
hearsay UNTIL THE LAW GOES INTO EXISTENCE. Until there is a con¬
spiracy the act of one cannot bind the others.

"Before June 28, 1940, no matter what these people said, or even if they
had an organization and talked together it would not make it a conspiracy to
violate that law because THERE WAS NO LAW. That is the reason I am object¬
ing to the introduction of these documents in evidence.

"We have had 16 weeks of nothing but what somebody has said about
Jews—nothing about appealing to the troops to be disloyal.”

Motion was denied.

204

The following was printed in the N. Y. News Aug. 14, 1947, reporting
the dropping of the mass-case:

"The mass-sedition trial, ordered by the late President Roosevelt, was part
of 'the smear terror' so well analyzed by John T. Flynn, and it had a single-
objective—To drive to cover all criticism of the Roosevelt intent to involve The
Republic in Europe's wars. . . . The heart of White House strategy of terror was:
We don't dare to indict and put on trial the big fellows who oppose us . . .
but if we indict some small fry . . .then we can perhaps scare the big fellows into
silence. , . .

"Incidentally, this burlesque on American justice, fairplay and the Federal
courts, has cost the U. S. Treasury between $1,000,000 and $1,500,000.

"The surviving defendants now go free, CLEARED BY THE DEPART¬
MENT OF JUSTICE OF EVER BEING GUILTY OF ANY CRIME."

"A few years ago there was a charge of criminal libel against Robert
Edward Edmondson (unconditionally' dismissed May 10, 1938) based upon
Anti-Semitic phamphlets which he was circulating. Emotionally, the prosecution
PLEASED US (Jews). We failed to realize that it might be a mistake to make a
martyr of him. On further consideration, Jewish groups felt that a trial of the
case would have a pernicious effect. In support of a motion to dismiss the indict¬
ment, briefs were filed by the American Jewish Congress, the American Jewish
Committee, the American Civil Liberties Union, whose briefs argued that the
protection of a free press and of religious Liberty -were more important than
conviction of the defendant. So the trial was stopped.

"But when Edmondson was again indicted (1942-4) in the seditious con¬
spiracy case, JEWISH EMOTIONS TRIUMPHED AGAIN." (From an
article written by Arthur Garfield Hays in the Jewish Post." (Hays was Chief
counsel for the American Civil Liberties Union.)

Does it "carry implications’’ that "Roosevelt and his Jews" were con-
spiratorially responsible for the two prosecutions? New Deal Jewish Mayor
LaGuardia of New York, by letter of June 8, 1936, scarted the N. Y. prosecu¬
tion of Defendant Edmondson.

The Washington Times-Herald of Nov. 23, 1946, commenting on the
dismissal of the mass-indictments, printed:

"The case was bred in malice, prosecuted in bate, and pursued in bigotry."

The Chicago Tribune of Nov. 25, 1946, editorially declared that the case
"was conceived dishonestly and conducted dishonestly. . . . The case w>as so
flimsy that Government counsel delayed it as long as they could, continuing
harassment of defendants.’’

The evidence of a Roosevelt frame-up to jail defendant Edmondson is
doubly-damning in consideration of the U. S. Supreme Court's dictum regard¬
ing the duty of Government prosecutors, quoted below:

"The United States Attorney is the representative, not of an ordinary party
to a controversy, but of a sovereignty whose obligation to govern impartially is
as compelling as its obligation' to govern at all; and whose interest, therefore,
in a criminal prosecution, is not that ic shall win a case but that justice shall be
done . . . Ana it is his duty to refrain from improper methods calculated to pro¬
duce a wrongful conviction, as it is to use every legitimate means to bring about
a just one." (Berger v. U. S„ 295 U. S. 78, 84, 79 L. ed. 1314, 55 S. Ct. 629.)

2 0 5

A Chicago Tribune editorial commented on Aug. 2, 1947, in more than
a column of denunciation:

"Five years and ten days after its inception, the infamous Washington
mass-sedition case died. It was launched by the Roosevelt Regime in an attempt
to silence all political dissent, and particularly all reference to the criminality
of those in high office who steered the American people into an unwanted war.

"Entrapment was employed to establish a showing that defendants were
moving toward their purported goal with interlocking action.

"The Messenger,” Los Angeles organ of B’nai B’rith, in its Dec. 15, 1944 ,
issue, published:

"The uncooperative press was largely responsible for the non-success of
the mass-sedition trial. SINCE THE ENTIRE REASON FOR THE TRIAL
was to educate the public into the ways cf Nazism to link Anti-Semitism and
other racisms with the Hitlerian movement, this lack of cooperation was A
FUNDAMENTAL SETBACK. The Justice Department has provided a larger
audience for the vicious mouthings of 'THE LUNATIC FRINGE .

Does all this show that "Roosevelt and his Jews"—to employ a Dorothy
Thompson label — were behind a criminal conspiracy to deprive defendant
Edmondson of substantial Constitutional rights?

Below is an eye-witness account of the court proceedings following a
Roosevelt radio national broadcast early in October prior to introduction of
"evidence" against mass-case Defendant Pelley.

"President Roosevelt put the mass case directly into politics in a big way
by his national broadcast linking the Pelley Silver Shirts with the Brown Shirts
and Black Shirts of Europe. There is no doubt that failure to convict defendants
has got ’under his hide.'

''Pelley's Defense Lawyer William J. Powers rose and attacked the Presi¬
dent for 'trying to influence the jury against all defendants by his national
broadcast.’ The court ordered him to proceed along 'different lines.’ Whereupon
Mr. Powers angrily asked Is the President of the United States the only one
who has a right to free speech to smear these helpless defendants over the air
and in the newspapers? If so, then the people of this country should know it.'
Prosecutor Rogge objected, was sustained and Mr. Powers sat down.

"Defense Counsel Frey, who had often denounced the proceedings as 'New
Deal political persecution,’ rose and demanded discontinuance of trial until
after election.

"Defense Attorney John Jackson, Jr., rose and declared heatedly that the
President’s denunciation was an attack on everv defendant in the case, the first
of any such attack by any President. He quoted U. S. Supreme Court decisions
dismissing cases that had achieved political notoriety.

"The Court then banned all oral argument, and reserved decision. (Later:
Motions denied)’’

Court-Appointed Defense Counsel Frank H. Myers (later elevated to the
Washington bench) filed May 1, 1946, a motion vigorously opposing additional
delay requested by the prosecution for further search to try to get new evidence
in Germany against defendants, in which he said: "To prolong this trial . , .
would be a travesty on our democratic processes and only serve to bring our
court in this jurisdiction into disrepute arising from this un-American and un¬
constitutional method of trial.”

2 0 6

Mr. Myers had previously spoken two and one-half hours declaring that,
after listening to "evidence’’ of the prosecution for many weeks, he had come
to the conclusion that "not any of the defendants are guilty as charged in the
indictment.”

The history of American criminal procedure fails to reveal one instance
where, as in this persecution, men were held in jail for years to give the prose¬
cutors an opportunity to build up a doubtful case.

"The theory behind the trial was that if this conglomeration of unrelated
persons, many of whom did not even know each other, could be convicted, a
precedent would be established that the law-- could be used in this country as
an instrument of political force and coercion. . . . The prosecution ended because
the Government had NO CASE.” (Baltimore News-Post of Aug. 18, 1947.)

Do Department of Justice Policies imperatively demand investigation?
Note that W. j. Powers, of the Chicago Bar, wrote as follows to the Chicago
Tribune in December, 1946:

"If any organization has maintained a set program of contempt for civil
liberties in this country, it is the Department of Justice.”

After citing a number of flagrant cases in detail Mr. Powers dwelt on
outstanding outrages in the so-called mass-sedition trial, saying:

"In an attempt to discover what it was all about, the writings of various
defendants were pooled and studied by defense-counsel. Some defendants had
opposed entry into World War II— others had not; some were German-
American Bund members—others were not; some were anti-jewish—others were
not. . . . The only common denominator for ALL defendants was that they were
more or less violently anti-communistic—YET THEY WERE ALL PROSE¬
CUTED FOR'SEDITION.'”

And defendants were not even indicted under the 1917 "War Espionage
Act” applicable to ' sedition,” but under the peace-time law of June 28, 1940,
which does not apply to "sedition” but to "seditious conspiracy”—a British
"seditious libel” judiciary title not in American Criminal Law, under which
large "group libel'' in the public interest is not actionable.

PRINCIPAL AGENCIES DEMANDING RETRIAL

Careful investigation indicates that the principal agencies publicly pressing for
retrial of what they miscall "the sedition case,” included the following Roosevelt

champions: ,

WALTER WINCHELL, listed in Who's Who m American Jewry as a radio-broad¬
caster and columnist of N. Y. City.

ADOLPH J. SABATH, listed in Who's Who in American Jewry as Congressman
from Illinois, born in Czechoslovakia.

B'NAl B'RITH, International Jewish Secret Order. Henry Monsky, President,
Chicago.

JEWISH SENTINEL of Chicago, J. I. Fishbem, Editor.

CALIFORNIA JEWISH VOICE of Los Angeles.

JEWISH NATIONAL DAY of N. Y. City, Rabbi Schmelka Margoshes, Editor, born
Galicia, Europe.

JEWISH EXAMINER of Brooklyn, N. Y., Rabbi Louis D. Gross, Editor.

'COUNTER-ATTACK," organ of "National Committee to Combat Anti-Semitism,"
L. E. Golditch, Executive Secretary, N. Y.City.

' IN FACT," Editor George Seldes, listed in Who's Who in American Jewry as
author, N. Y.-City.

"DAILY WORKER" (U. S. Communist Party organ), Alan Max, Editor; Incor¬
porators: Alex Trachtenburg, Ray Seigartel, Isaac Schorr. Irving Franklin, N. Y. City.

"PM” N. Y. City daily paper—"Uptown Edition of the Communist Daily Worker."

"CIO. Organizers: Sidney Hillman, born Lithuania; David Dubinsky, born Poland;
Max Zaritsky, bom Russia, heads of the three most prominent N. Y. City so-called Red
clothing union monopolies. CIO was backed by the Communist-aiding Political Action Com¬
mittee with its 400 Jewish names among Communists as listed by the Congressional Com¬
mittee Report of March, 1944, in an investigation of the "CIO-PAC” political activities.

"NEW MASSES," Communistic periodical, N. Y. City.

2 0 7

Dneaur j. Edgar Hoove; of the FBI. in his 1952 report, is quoted as saying:
"We could not make a wmse mistake than to think there is less Communist activity now
than there was when it was flaunted in our faces. . . . The party itself had to go under¬
ground. ... It continues to be one of the major threats to internal security.”

Radio Broadcaster Fulton Lewis Jr. said in his syndicated column (2-11-52), that
Congressman Dies in his nntr-communist exposures, quoted the late President Roosevelt
as stating: There is nothing wrong with the Communists, Some of the best friends I
have are Communists.”

ROOSEVELT REVENGE MOTIVES

Can there now be any doubt that President Roosevelt had Robert Edward
Edmondson, whom he knew had retired from all publicity a year before Pearl
Harbor, put in the 1942-7 Washington mass-case under the impulsion o.f re¬
venge motives, both personal and political? The following speaks for itself.

(1) After giving high praise to President Roosevelt following his in¬
auguration in the early part of 1933, but becoming patriotically alarmed by New
Deal un-Americanism, Edmondson published Dec. 27, 1933, an open letter to
the President asking him if the New Deal was trying to change the Republic-
form of the U. S. Government into a communistic democracy. This letter was
"answered” June 11, 1936, by a N. Y. City indictment charging Edmondson with
"libel of all persons of the Jewish religion" by a Jewish-majority grand jury,
under the Roosevelt lieutentancy of Jewish Mayor LaGuardia.

(2) Edmondson broadcast under date of Oct. 20, 1936, a bulletin re¬
producing a previously published genealogical descent indicating that Roosevelt
was of Jewish ancestry—supporting the chart with a long series of confirming
documentation, not only genealogically but by association with Jews and his
appointment of Jews to many positions in the national administration.

(3) Forcing by damning exposures a court backdown May 10, 1938, of
the N. Y. City libel charge, doubtless intensified the President's wrath.

(4) Edmondson's continued publicity exposures of the Communistic nature
of the New Deal and its politico-economic many subversions of traditional
Americanism, intensified motivation.

(5) Emphasizing Roosevelt's dishonorable repudiation of the dollar,
government bond gold pledge, and other monetary subversions through an in¬
ternational banking cabal, which were creating "inextinguishable debt," raising
the national debt to more than 200 billion dollars, added fuel to wrath.

(6) Publicly uncovering Roosevelt’s persistent warmongering promises
and actions indicating secret maneuvering toward war involvement, must have
made him jittery.

(7) Anger at the manner in which Edmondson and defense attorneys
were obtaining from prosecution witnesses themselves a cumulative volume of
evidence further unmasking New Deal subversions, increased hatred.

The manifest prostitution of the Judicial and Executive Departments as
plainly exposed in these Petition records, imposes upon the Senate Judiciary
and House Un-American Activities Committees of The Congress the imperative
high duty to exhaustively investigate and publicly unmask to fitting punishment
identifiable sinister forces which have blackened the Honor of the Govern¬
ment of the United States by secretly "pressuring" its administrators to grossly
oppress and shamelessly persecute loyal citizens for uncovering treason to The
Republic in time of peril to the Nation.

208

TRIAL ATMOSPHERE HIGH-LIGHTS
In the 1944 Roosevelt New Deal Communistic Mass-Persecution of Patriots

at Washington, D. C.

(From a Daily Diary)

By Marian L. Edmondson, Defendant's Wife, Deceased 19 o2

PREFATORY. These reports began June 25, 1944, with daily diary notes by
Marian L. Edmondson, following approval of the jury which heard the case.
The first jury was invalidated by prosecution technical error. Many defendants
believed it ’’packed." The Communist Daily Worker Washington correspondent
said when the first panel was rejected: "That looks bad." Court-appointed at¬
torneys told defendants they had been informed that all defendants were guilty,
and their services wouldn't be required sixty days. The mistrial lasted over seven
months, Within a short time defense counsel began to discover the innocence of
defendants, and progressively became their champions to a degree and extent
beyond parallel. Wich not only individual liberties at stake, but the very life of
The Republic hanging in suspense, personal and patriotic emotions were stirred
to the depths, and they are responsible for this unique and revelatory account of
FDR’s court "Travesty on Justice."

ACTUAL HAPPENINGS

"Today the judge ruled that he would permit the prosecution to expand and
develop its 'background' theory. That was done, going back over 20 years. But
the ’evidence’ thus far entered seems absurd to many of us. Yet no one can tell
what the jury will make of it.

"Contrary to proper legal procedure, four defendants were absent as the
prosecution’s 'case' was presented against them. Illness and deaths prevented
attendance. My husband commented: 'This will probably be known later as a
mass-murder case.’ One of the marshals of the court said to me: I don't like
'em any better than you do,’ referring to Jews.

"A defense attorney remarked: 'It now begins to look as though the prose¬
cution is determined to prolong this case indefinitely to punish the unpaid
lawyers who have dared to challenge unfair and illegal tactics. Were we sup¬
posed to 'go along’ and let honest defense of clients go to hell? We just couldn't
do that and live with ourselves afterward.’

"Every piece of ’evidence’ submitted by the prosecution has now been entered
’provisionally’ or Tor the present’—apparently because of forceful objections and
arguments presented by defense counsel and ’over-ruled.’ Prosecution witnesses
have been reduced to explanations and excuses such as 'that is the way I under¬
stand it.’

"On Tuesday we all thought the judge was going to have some kind of a
seizure, and I was frightened. For apparently no reason, as defense arguments
were proceeding, the judge began to bang his gavel. His face, neck and scalp
■ (he is bald) were suffused with blood—and we held our breath!

"Later, while defense attorneys were cross-examining a witness, the judge
intoned lifelessly: 'Objection over-ruled.' Then, realizing that the prosecution
had made no objection, he quickly added: 'On motion of the court.' Prosecutor
as well as judge?

2 OS

"A soldier was put on the stand to testify as to receiving a printed com¬
munication from one of the defendants—to establish jurisdiction in Washing¬
ton, D. C. He was the Providence journal correspondent here. On cross-exam¬
ination he admitted that it was not the only material he had received; that it was
one of hundreds of various propaganda sheets his office received monthly; that
he was not in military service at the time, and the United States was at peace.
This soldier also admitted that the 'evidence' he had received did not undermine
his morale' and that he did not know of any other man lh the armed services
whose morale had suffered from such material.

"At the close of Thursday's session one defense lawyer rose ; after the jury
had-been dismissed, and demanded that all evidence so far admicted, be
struck, since not a bit of it had sustained the indictment contention as to under¬
mining of the morale of the armed forces’ and was nothing but proof that some
of the defendants were anti-Semitic.’

"The judge ruled: 'Motion denied.'

A Tempo of Intimidation

"It is evident now that the planned tempo of this trial was one of fear and
intimidation, but it has been utterly frustrated by the courage of these American
defense counsel. They have made the affair ridiculous, which is bad for the
prosecution.

"Now comes a demand for impeachment of the judge. Perhaps nothing
will come of it, but it is bad publicity for the prosecution. The actions of some
defense attorneys has been so spectacular that the press had to give the proceed¬
ings publicity. Those explosions were 'news,' and it was a real triumph to break
through this ban on justice.

"We again held our breath when Edmondson Defense Attorney Frey,
suddenly rose and said to the court: 'What kind of procedure is this anyway? I
never heard anything like it. Can't we have some kind of orderly procedure
here.'

"He was merely told he was out of order.’

"Another defense lawyer rose later and heatedly demanded: 'Are proper
proceedings of this court to be reversed? There has never been aything like it.
Matters which should be excluded are admitted, and vice versa.’ He was not
reprimanded. He sits next to our attorney, who, in turn, is just in front of my
husband. This lawyer, who stands very high in the Washington bar, talks a great
deal to my husband.

"Defendant Sanctuary is without a lawyer. His attorney was fined a second
time—for ’obstructing justice’ because of delay in cross-examination. He had
been trying to look over a mass of evidence submitted by the prosecution in order
to frame more questions. Masses of evidence are thrown at the defense without
proper time for investigation. Protests are over-ruled, Under the circumstances,
defense attorneys have performed miracles.

"One prominent defense attorney said to me: "I am intimidated by these
fines for 'contempt' by the judge. I admit it. My firm is intimidated. And I know
that there are other attorneys who feel the same way. We fear to take proper
steps to protect our clients.’ 'Planned that way?'

"If there is anything that gets me down, it will be this diabolical Washing¬
ton heat. A Turkish bath day and night! If it isn’t cruel and inhuman 'punish¬
ment' to force these defendants to suffer in the inferno of a Washington
summer, I would like to know what it can be called.

2 1 0

Legal Error Condoned

''Here is a sample of prosecution tactics. Defense Attorney Lindas arose and
asked whether or not the whole piece of evidence, against which defence
counsel were objecting, would be presented to the jury. The court assured him
that only the article in question would be shown. The entire paper was given to
the jury.

"Directly after intermission and before the jury had been summoned back
into the courtroom Attorney Lindas again rose and in a voice filled with're¬
sentment, said he had a stipulation with the prosecution not to show that
particular exhibit for, in the column next to the article in question, was another
which described arrest, conviction and sentencing of Lindas’ client for another
offense. He argued with rising voice that the prosecution had broken its promise,
and his client’s case had been jeopardized by the fact that the jury had seen
proof of previous imprisonment.

"Every one in the courtroom was silent as Lindas sat down, and the
prosecution appeared stunned at such a legal error. The judge was dumfounded
then announced that he would 'take the matter under advisement.' Lindas
demanded dischage of the jury and declaration of 'mistrial.'

"Next day the judge announced denial of Lindas’ motion on the ground
that Lindas had not sufficiently informed the judge of the basis for the objection
and motion. It was a very shabby performance and showed bias. Lindas took an
exception. Other defense lawyers shook their heads deprecadngly. Assistant
Prosecutor Bums rose and abjectly apologized for the incident, but the damage
had been done.

On the same day, Defense Attorney Ennis, read into the record U. S.
Supreme Court citations to the effect that extraneous matter should not be inter¬
jected in cases—only such evidence as directly concerned charges made. He
was objecting to the mass of purely political and irrelevant matter introduced
by Rogge. Ennis heatedly declared that this was turning out to be a trial of anti-
Semitism and politics. The judge over-ruled his motion. One news commentator
said the judge denied motions which came too late and also those which came
too early. Strong indications developed showing that the jury was becoming
disgusted. Sarcastic smiles at times conveyed an ‘eyeful.’

"One day the prosecution entered 85 exhibits as 'evidence;’ with Witness
Luedtke on the stand. Defense attorneys jumped to their feet and heatedly asked
how it would be possible to inspect it when there was but one copy for all the
22 defense attorneys. Then there was a ruckus! 'Do you think I’m going to give
my case away' yelled Rogge when he was asked to permit inspection the day
previous to introduction.

"The 13th week of this travesty ended on July 13. The general impression
now is that the judge himself is not satisfied with the progress made. He must
know, from the reactions of the jury > that they are not impressed by the pro¬
secution presentment. And not One piece of so-called evidence shown to the
jury is anything but ‘Anti-Semitic’ and Anti-Communist. Not one! There has
been not one thing to link defendants to the charges of the indictment as to
undermining the morale of the armed forces.

“The ablest men of the defence counsel have been waiting to find out just
what the prosecution had against us; and they are becoming more and more
convinced chat defendants are innocent. Some of them even said the judge would
be forced to deliver a directed verdict in favor of defendants, but we do not
want a mistrial. We want to be cleared! One defence attorney told me a mistrial

2 1 1

i, desir-Lbie as there never would be another indictment like this one if it fails
lo be Seined; bur I very earnestly told him that would not sort many of. us.

”We have more reason than ever before to believe that all this tremendous

of t h: P wotld fow, and ate losing money daily. The 7 ?"?."^^
without compensation. One lawyer told me he was losing S200C a month, hut
they are noJ actually joyously fighting this battle, apparently because they feel

rhe prosecution hasn t any case.

"Here is a noteworthy incident: In the outer hall I overheard a correspond,
ent for the Commumst Daily Worker talking to some defense lawyers^ He: re¬
marked- 'These defendants are certainly good sports. They are tak.ng this trial
with a smile, and seem to have a lot of fun w.th each other. And then lawyers,

t0 ° "I felt like asking him just how Ire thought we should act. I could have
cold him we do not know how to act in a guilty manner because we are
completely innocent of the charges.

"But it was high praise coming from so foul a sheet as the Daily Worker,
and evidently defendants' attitude made a deep impression on him. As a maher
of fact the Daily Worker has lately been maintaining a thunderous silence as to
Se^ Sal There^rs precious little nourishment in the proceedings from their

point of view.

Evidence Still Admitted ''Provisionally’'

"My husband went to the courtroom early on the day heretofore, referred
to to gel affairs in order for his attorney^and found a group examining^ 30
bulletins of his whtch were to be offered. He asked one lawyer: Do you thmk
they are too tough?' The reply came, 'Well, they're true, are they not? the
answer was an unqualified Yes.' As a matter of fact Jewish confesses to be
presented in documentation-form answer questions themselves.

"On Thursday, Defense Attorney Lindas rose and vehemently objected to
prosecution evidence on the ground that it was almost entirely on anti-Semitism.
He is a big man and his voice rises to almost a shout when he becomes angry.
He told tl5 court that what was being offered was raising a tide of raciapre¬
judice not only in the courtroom but in the District ot Columbia that Je^sh
members of the Bar whom he had always considered friends were being Harmed
bv the procedure of the prosecution, which was raising this prejudice—not
defendants. He demanded a stop to it. The judge reiterated that all evidence

wa S being admitted provisionally.’ was that ’ but [t WaS g °° d news t0

those of us on trial,

"The 15 th week of this strange Moscow un-American trial could well be
oiled gala,’ permitting a play on the word. Before noon on Monday the court-
mom Is swept by a gale of laughter-and another blew us out on Thursday
The adjectives 'farcical' and 'fantastic’ are O.K. m them way, but the red word
to be used here is just plain 'cockeyed.' For the trial is being conducted m
reverse -—the way the Jews read their printing—Defendants and counsel are
'in high' and the prosecution is 'down-under’ in the dumps. But the motion-
denied’ droning goes monotonously on.

2 12

"Regarding Monday’s developments: Defense Counsel Bilbrey is white-
haired, meager in frame and has a high sense of humor. He is an adept in cross-
examination. He never rubs witness the wrong wav, and leads him up the garden
path in a way joyous to see, He draws out the most damaging testimony without
seeming to do so—and knows when to stop, which, I find, is something very-
important indeed. He gave an outstanding performance Monday and left a
prosecution witness dangling high in the air after proving his point, and did
the defence enjoy a big laugh!

'‘Following the foregoing, Assistant Prosecutor Burns started his ball roll¬
ing by offering as evidence about thirty of my husband's bulletins. The principal
one was headed 'Roosevelt’s Jewish Ancestry,’ and when Burns objected to
handing that to the jury as it 'would take too much timed Edmondson Defence
Attorney Frey demanded the right to read it. Permission was granted—and
it took half an hour. Once the bulletin reference was made to a medal, and Mr.
Frey handed to the jury a famous medal with the six-pomt Jewish star on one
side and likeness of Franklin D. Roosevelt on the other, with a Yiddish hierogly¬
phic of 'Good Luck' inside the star.

"A defence lawyer near me leaned over and gleefully whispered: "Your
attorney is getting away with murder. He hasn’t any right to do what he is doing,’
but that is what he did.

Jews Headed Four N. Y. Political Tickets

"Mr. Burns was reading one bulletin published by my husband 'with all the
stops out’ and emphasis intended to impress the jury with the villainy of
Defendant Edmondson, but he read one too many paragraphs—which we be¬
lieve he intended to omit. The paragraph referred to the N.Y. gubernatorial elec¬
tions of 1934, when the Jew Lehman headed the Democratic ticket; Moses the
Republican; Solomon the Socialist and Israel Amter the Communist ticket. On
the bulletin was the Edmondson comment: 'It sounds like the Old Testament—
but it must never happen again, for 80 r ,‘r of the Gentile electorate of New York
was practically 'disfranchised.'

"Laughter literally deluged the courtroom—and the judge could do nothing
to stop it. The jury was one broad grin. Burns snapped that it be shown in the
record 'there was much laughter in the courtroom.' Defence Attorney Bilbrev
lifted his hand, arose and with smiles wreathing his face, stated: 'I thought it
was funny. I laughed.’ Defendant Jones put on the crowning touch by rising and
saying: 'I want the record to show that Prosecutor Rogge didn’t laugh at all.’
Then came another gale of laughter, one defence lawyer near me exclaiming:
'That was priceless!’

"No more of my husband’s bulletins were read that day, nor all the rest
of the week. It was a sad anti-climax to the 'great work' of the prosecution.
Edmondson's bulletins turned out to be dynamite!

"Prosecution Witness Luedtke, former Secretary of the German-American
Bund, was on the stand all week. Defence attorneys brought out his statement
that there was no plot to Nazify the U.S. by any other means than propaganda
designed to show the benefits of National Socialism. No force or violence! One
attorney went over the 25 points of the Nazi Program in detail, and drew out
the statement that it was not based on forceful aggression throughout the
world.

"Another defence lawyer took up my husband’s bulletins and asked Witness
Luedtke if he still believed Jews and Communism were a menace to this

2 1 3

country, as stated therein. "Yes” he replied. Luedtkesaid Edmondson was known
generally not to be against Jews as a race, religion or people, but simply be¬
cause of what Jewish Leaders were doing politically. He was very respectful of
my husband’s work, which he admired.

"My husband came out of that 'attack' of the prosecution with flags flying,
and that boosted defence morale and standing a lot. Respect and affection are
shown him by defence counsel, which makes us very happy. A lawyer of high
social as well as professional standing voluntarily joined a warm session my
husband was having with his own counsel for not bringing out certain points
as per client’s directions. This ocher attorney advised: 'You do as Mr. Edmondson
tells you. He has forgot more about the crucial facts of this case than most
people ever knew.' You can imagine how I felt about that.

Defense Counsel Fervor

"There has developed a sort of evangelical fervor, patriotic and religious,
among defense counsel. They reach higher ground every week. They are simply
outdoing themselves. Even the most backward are becoming inspired. Tears are
forgotten as the onward march against New Deal subversion, as pro\ed m this
courtroom, becomes more and more evident.

Defense Attorney Gallagher, in his inimitable style, quietly and master¬
fully—in an address exposing what the prosecution was trying to put over on
the defendants—declared with indignation that defendants had bc-en brought
into court under a 'hypothesis of guilt' before they had even faced a jury. Then
he leaned toward the judge and said impressively: 'Your Honor, there is such
a thing as a hypothesis of innocence.’

"The judge quickly said: I know that, Mr. Gallagher. 1 was certain you
did' was Gallagher's quick comment: 'but i wanted to bring that matter to your
Honor’s attention and have it placed in the record. I wouldn t be defending my
clients as 1 am, did I believe them guilty of the charges in this indictment.'

"I was so enthralled by the masterful elucidation of this noted professor of
law that I can recall but a fraction of the powerful statements he made. It was
forensic oratory with no bombast. You could see defense counsel in general were
also deeply moved by Mr. Gallagher’s arguments.

"There is one court-appointed lawyer here who has bec-n reluctant to take
a very strong stand, fearing it might react against him professionally and
socially; but he climbed on the band wagon this week because of improperly
seized documents of his client he had been given to understand he would be
permitted to inspect. 'I have been imposed upon' he vehemently declared, and
then he opened a powerful attack on the jurisdiction of the court in this case.
'Nothing has been introduced to place the scene of this alleged crime in
Washington' he declared. Whereupon Prosecutor Rooge rose and asserted that
the Government had proof of jurisdiction in the form of two letters sent to a
Post Office Box here. Two letters sent to a Post Office Box! this lawyer
scornfully ejaculated, 'Well, if that’s all Mr. Rogge has, he has no case.’ As he
sat down near my husband he murmured to him 'There is no honor nor decency
in this man Rogge.' And were we glad he at last realized that.

"Another star-performer defense counsel then reviewed the whole pro¬
ceedings, stressing the hardships visited on defendants, many of whom had been
impoverished and had to live in cramped and uncomfortable quarters in the
terrible heat of Washington; that they had been forced here in violation of
Constitutional guarantees, and that the prosecution had not established one point

2 1 4

to prove the indictment charges. The judge usually stops statements like that, but
so many citations were introduced that he just couldn t stop this speaker. When
he had finished, the lawyer in front of me caught him by the arm saying 'You
brought tears to my eyes/ It was a dramatic moment, and raised the trial to a
new high. It was the simplicity of sincerity that was moving.

"All Out" For Defendants

"Explanatory of how sincere the foregoing was, let me tell you of a
meeting we had with this lawyer and his wife later. He said he wanted his wife
to meet us and we went to a quiet place to talk. His wife told me how con¬
vinced her husband was of the utter innocence of defendants. He had been
approached by Jewish members of the Washington Bar, who told him lie was
doing himself 'great damage.' His wife said he told them that he didn't care if
every Jew in Washington were told about his determination to give the defease
all he had, for he believed in their innocence completely.

"This is being written on the first day of the 17th week of the trial. In
the last half hour excitement commenced, and defendants and counsel burst out
of the courtroom like children from school, laughing, joking and slapping each
other on the back. This is what happened.

"Prosecutor Rogge began to read excerpts from Defendant Pelley's
writings, in connection with the infamous 14 themes of the notorious Lasswell
'Thought Parallelism' or guilt by association', which caused Pelley's conviction
on sedition charges.

"Defence counsel were on their feet repeatedly declaring that they had not
been supplied with true copies of what Rogge was reading. Rogge became so
fussed up chat he made errors which probably would not have occurred other¬
wise. And defence attorneys jumped on his back like a lot of terriers. Finally
he dropped his book, and stormed. 'Defense Counsel are running a filibuster
against me to cause the jury to lose the import of what I am reading,’ Edmond¬
son's Lawyer Frey jumped up, as did many others, but he got in the first word
with 'If Mr. Rogge will read correctly there will be no interruptions; if he
doesn’t do that we’ll keep on in the interest of our clients.’ So much error
popped up that the whole courtroom, including the jury, were laughing. Even
the judge smiled, and he didn't 'gavel 'em down' as in the past. Don’t ask me
[why—he just didn't, The end result was that what was intended to be im¬
portantly impressive ended in a joke—and that was good for us.

"Tuesday the prosecution continued a monotonous reading of the Pelley
publications. Many, including jurymen, took naps. One of the most amusing
details concerns two alternate jurymen in the front row who sit near me. One
is small; the other big, 6 feet tall. After lunch, at times, the big fellow settled
down for a good snooze, and the efforts of the little guy to keep him awake
convulsed watchers. The little fellow in the middle of some testimony, sud¬
denly nudged the big one. It took frequent nudgings to keep the sleepy juryman
from falling out of his chair.

Conspiracy Rule Ignored

"One of the ablest defence lawyers in the court room rose and protested
'violently’ (to use his own term) against the foul blows the prosecution was
dealing defendants, declaring it was not only hitting below the belt but was
kicking defendants on the shins. Nothing happened.

"On Tuesday our Defense Counsel Mr. Frey pointed out that the attorney
for one defendant was absent and therefore defendant was not represented

2 1 5

properly. The judge ruled that since that defendant's name was noc mentioned in
the current proceedings, it didn’t matter. 'But,' our attorney remonstrated. 'I
remind your Honor again that this is a conspiracy trial and chat what affects
one affects all.’ The judge said 'The ruling stands.’

"Thursday, Prosecutor Rogge handed a great pile of literature to the jury
just to look at title pages and names of publishers. Instead of following the
prosecutor's instructions to give the matter superficial inspection, they took two
hours to look carefully through the whole pile. Rogge cast many anxious
glances at the jurymen, and requested a shortening up of the time; but the jury
went stolidlv on reading. The judge ruled that they could take all the time they
needed. Evidently, he did not dare to do otherwise.

"The ISth week of this inquisition ended abruptly today because of the
death of an associate justice, a fine man and a just judge of whom we had heard
much favorable comment. We were glad of the respite, for almost unendurable
summer heat had left us exhausted. But, with it all, there has been no weakening
on part of counsel or defendants. In fact, resolution to carry on seems to have
been strengthened, for defense lawyers have risen to new' heights of righteous¬
ness. They are standing on the solid rock of our immortal Constitution, just as
our enemies are on the shifting sands of deceit and dishonor. For those of us
who revere the Constitution, it is a never-ending source of inspiration. Years
ago my husband delivered an address in New York city before an audience of
15-00 on "Americanism,’’ in -which he said: 'The enemies of our Republican
form of Government will wreck themselves on the Rock of the Constitution.’
And, verily, that is now proving to be the case. The great men W'ho created that
document dedicated to it their lives, their fortunes and their sacred honor. Can
we do less?

"The faces of ail in the court show- the devastating effects of this seem¬
ingly endless struggle, but morale continues high. We have been literally dive-
bombed. subjected to heavy artillery fire, gassed, and "tanked;" but we have not
yielded an inch. The defense attorneys are magnificent. Every day they seem to
have found new power, and have forced the enemy back time and again. They
have etched into the record the real objective of the opposition—the planned
destruction of the fundamental law of the land and the imposition of dictator¬
ship by executive authority.

"Monday opened with a recess for the jury owning to illness of one of
its members. The day was taken up with the argument of Defence Counsel
Gallagher, as co improper seizure of papers. This was something one reads
about, but seldom hears. Another attorney told me: That is what is heard in the
highest courts of the land, particularly the U. S. Supreme Court—and Mr.
Gallagher is second to none in that respect.’ It was calm, measured, and
logically based on Constitutional rights of defendants. The courtroom was so
quiet one could have heard the drop of the traditional pin, yet this gifted man
spoke for two hours. We all knew this superlative analysis would be 'over¬
ruled’—but it would be in the record.

A "War Search” in Peace Time

"To deny Mr. Gallagher’s points the judge had to follow the New Deal
Communist Line' by putting the executive above Constitution, as has been so
often done during the Roosevelt Administration. The newspapers, commenting
on this event, said the judge had 'set up a new precedent.’

After Defense Counsel Gallagher had finished his argument and taken up
and concluded another long period in masterly cross-examination of an FBI

2 1 6

man who had made a seizure ar Los Angles, our Defense Attorney Mr. Frey
'finished him off' in a most unexpected manner. The FBI agent insisted that
an executive or presidential warrant' authorized him to conduct the 'raid’ (as
defense counsel insisted on terming it), because it was issued 'in war time.'

'When was war declared?’ asked our counsel.

" 'Dec. 8/

'But that was on japan, was it not?’

" 'Yes.'

" 'But that didn't mean we were at war with Germany! This was an anti-
German raid.’

" 'I considered we were at war with Germany’ replied witness.

" "When did the U. S. declare war on Germany?’

" 'On Dec, 11th, 1941/

" 'Then, when you made this raid Congress had not yet declared war on
Germany. Is that true?’

" 'That’s right.’

" ’Then you made this raid while we were technically at peace with Ger¬
many, did you not?’

” I suppose you can put it that way,’ was the reply.

"But the judge ruled that because Japan was in alliance with the 'Axis’ the
President had a right to INFER that we were at war with Germany on Dec. 8,
the date of the war declaration against Japan. The court w'as asked: 'Doesn’t that
bypass Congress and. give the executive the right to ’beat the gun?’ But the
answer was 'the ruling of the court stands.’

"During cross-examination of this FBI witness by Defense Attorney
Powers, the prosecutor kept interrupting until Mr. Powers asked him to let him
do the examining: but the judge upheld Rogge so many times that Attorney
Powers turned loose a savage attack on the way the trial was being conducted.
The judge smashed his gavel and everyone jumped. Mr. Powers continued to
speak w’ith the judge shouting 'the court has ruled.’ Whereupon Mr. Powers
marched back to his seat declaring that 'no counsel could properly defend his
client in this court.' We held our breath, realizing, from the way the judge
looked at Mr. Powers, that a contempt charge v/as apparently being considered.
But evidently the judge feared to take such action; and the incident passed with
no more damage than the loss of considerable breath.

"But another defense attorney rose and declared that the rulings of the
judge were forcing defense lawyers inco a 'condition of involuntary servitude.’
Yet all that happened was that he was ordered to take his seat, and the jury w'as
instructed to disregard the matter. We were mighty glad the jury heard it all.

The "Wrong Man” Died

"It was important to us to note that while the Los Angeles defendants did
not consent to search, they did not ’obstruct,’ for there came citation after
citation from the U. S. Supreme Court that ’submission is not consent.’

2 17

"I am dizzy with this heat. If I should lose my sanity, as so many of our
blessed boys in battle are doing, you will read of a demented woman standing
on a street corner and yelling to the passing crowd, 'Sheep going to slaughter!’
Yet the conviction persists that there is an awakening in the making.

"On August 26, 1944: "Heaven has been kind at last. Cooler weather,
which will enable us to live through the rest of the summer. It took four days
to cooi off the bedrooms where we exist.

"Several amusing incidents occurred while we were milling around the
courthouse before the court had proclaimed a recess on account of the death of
Associate Justice Luhring. Our Attorney, Mr. Frey, met Defense Counsel Dilling
just outside the door, and said to him: 'Do you believe we shall be dismissed for
a recess on account of the death of Justice Luhring? He was an upright judge!
Too bad he had to die!’

" 'Yes, the wrong man died!' Another lawyer who heard the remark, and
■who has a powerful delivery, sympathetically exclaimed. 'If the right man dies
I will take charge of the funeral and declaim a Marc Antony—'I come to bury
Richer, not to praise him!’ Which uncovers the intense disgust of counsel.

"But we feel this court battle may have to be fought to the bitter end
without short cuts. Indeed, The Constitution itself is embattled in the court¬
room, and history is being made. Not only are defense counsel not disheartened,
their resolution seems to have been strengthened.

"The high spot of the 19th week of this trial monstrosity was an almost
two-hour address by Senator Langer on the floor of the Senate. He had spent
two days in the courtroom. He seemed to be in a sardonic mood, and gave close
attention to proceedings. I did not go to the Senate because I do not wish to
miss anything during the trial, When I read later his speech in the Congressional
Record my indignation concerning the manner in which the trial was being
handled was so red-hot that it is just as well I did not attend.

"The week began by defendants and counsel trooping back to "school 1 ’
laughing and recounting recess developments. Defence counsel looked weary,
as they had used the interim to try to catch up with their own business affairs’
working late into the nights. But their high morale was unimpaired, and they
were ready for action again. We were startled when we saw the judge. He
looked very ill indeed. His personal secretary, who was in court, looks like
death. There were rumors that the judge had a heart attack. No verification. Our
counsel greeted Rogge, and was irritably asked; 'Why didn’t you stay away for
another two ■weeks?’ ’With my client’s publications coming up today?’ our
attorney asked and said sharply. That isn’t the way I do business.’

Devotion to The Constitution

"Material presented showed that my husband had sold, not given his
publications to other defendants. No conspiracy there. Defence-Counsel John
Jackson came to us at lunch and said: One of Mr. Edmondson’s publications
is enough to clear him in the eyes of the jury and completely show's his in¬
nocence, for he stated that he had refused to use certain material in his pos¬
session as it slightly’ reflected against his country. Your attorney should
emphasize that word ‘slightly,’ for it means that Defendant Edmondson would
not lend himself to even a mild form of criticism of the U. S.—which is enough
to prove that he so loved the form of Government of this country that he
w'ould have no part in its detraction.’ It meant a lot to us, for Mr. Jackson is very
conservative.

2 1 8

' The waving of a large swastika flag before the jury caused another out¬
burst of indignation by some defence counsel, who insisted that this act was
only to try to arouse prejudice in the minds oi the jury. One lawyer declared
that demonstration was an 'abuse of judicial discretion.' That brought im¬
mediate action from the court, who dismissed the jury and called on counsel to
justify his allegation. He added ominously, 'there will be no fine this time.'
The attorney spoke for several minutes, admitting afterward that jail stared him
in the face;' but that he felt he had a right to make the charge in defense of his
client, saying he didn't care whether his client was a German, a Japanese or a
Hottentot. He had declared he had meant no contempt of any particular judge,
and attention was directed to the fact that he used the words judicial discretion.'
In his indignation he seemed to be reckless of his own safety. Tension went
into high. The judge 'reserved decision.’

"Lace Thursday a witness against Jones and Noble went on the stand. On
her lap were a pile of typewritten transcripts. She was noted to read whole
paragraphs. That aroused defence anger, and protests were made. The judge-
ruled she might ’refresh her memory.' 'But, Your Honor, she is more than re¬
freshing memory—she is reading from those transcripts.’ The judge said 'the
ruling stands.'

"One of the mildc-st of the defence lawyers became so angry that he made a
motion that all her 'testimony’ be thrown ouc, and that she be admonished bv
the court to refresh from memory. 'Over-ruled,' was all he got. This witness
proved to be one of the most assured and positive witness the prosecution
called. She refused to answer questions directly, and made a speech. I w.u
watching the jury closely and found that they are laughing at her and not with
her. Among other things she boasted of her especially trained memory,' and
finally, as a test. Defence Counsel Powers submitted a report of the previous
day, and asked her to repeat it. She repeated from memory, and gave a very
different account. 'That’s all’ said Mr. Powers.

"She told of a mock trial which impeached’ FDR, and upon questioning,
admitted that it was not treasonable but in 'bad taste.’ Then she heatedly said
that international bankers and Jews had been denounced at the meetings.

Prosecution Witness Discredited

"This prosecution witness was on the stand for most of five days. Defence
Counsel St. George questioned her on Monday, and when he made little head¬
way Lawyer Ennis said: 'Why don't they let her go. She has stood every one of
us on our heads, and even though we know she is not telling the truth, we can't
pin her down,’ In the afternoon, Defendant Jones, one of those convicted by
her testimony in California, began his cross-examination. He is not a lawyer, and
others begged him not to question her, I reminded him that he stood high in
favor with the jury, and not to jeopardize that standing. He replied he would
be careful, So the show was on with our hearts in our mouths. But we didn't
need to worry,

Mr. Jones started, quietly. The whole courtroom was very quiet, and we
were sitting on the edge of our chairs. Mr. Jones finally forced her to admit that
he had denounced all 'isms’ but Americanism, and admitted reluctantly that she
could say favorable things about him. 'But you didn’t put those favorable things
in your written record, did you?' She was silent and the court upheld her. 'Do
you hold Jews engaged in political or economic pursuits are protected by their
religion?’ asked Mr. Jones. She hesitated and looked inquiringly at Prosecutor
Rogge. He blocked an answer by objecting to the question as 'immaterial.'

2 1 9

Defense counsel became aroused by the tricky methods exposed, and one lawyer
who had taken little part in protests voiced his resentment. The judge said
'Counsel waived cross-examination.' This attorney snapped: 'What has that
got to do with it—I have risen in the interest of justice.’ The decision was
'over-ruled,'

"Defendant lones' gallant efforts brought Defence Attorney Sc. George to
his feet with the declaration: 'Mr. Jones has done more with this recalcitrant
witness than any lawyer in the courtroom, and I strongly object co the treatment
he is receiving from prosecution and court.’ Mr. Jones said 'That's all’ when he
found he could net get out all the truth. There was no doubt the jury was with
him.

Defense Lawyer Powers questioned an FBI witness who was called Wed¬
nesday with regard to search, and asked him whether the accused had broken
any Federal Law. The reply was that he was looking to see tf they 'intended to.’
Mr. Powers then said 'As a lawyer, yourself, don’t you know that there can be
no search unless there is a charge that the law has been violated?’ The witness
hesitated and then stated that he though: that was true. ’Then why did you do
it?' The witness rc-plic-d: 'Because I was told to do so.' When he had finished,
Mr. Powers warmly congratulated him for his co-operation, which must have
impressed the jury in that it showed defense attorneys were interested only in
bringing out the truth. It was a fine piece of strategy.

New Deal Tries To "Quiet The News”

"At adjournment time the judge suggested that defence counsel examine
records Prosecutor Rogge had collected, so they could proceed the next morn-
ling. One defence attorney rose and said he would consent to no such
arrangement'; that time after adjournment was his to attend to his own neglected
business, that he sat four days a week in court without compensation, and he
was not willing to do more. Other lawyers joined in his protest, whereupon
the judge plaintively commented: 'I hope one or two will be ready to go ahead
tomorrow.’

"An important defence lawyer told us Thursday that Charles MichaeLson
(jew) of White House and New Deal fame (?), called a conference of news¬
paper men during the long court recess and appealed to them not to print any
more stuff about the trial. All of them in Washington had agreed except Re¬
porter Carter Brook Jones of the Washington Star. Mr. Jones is doing an
excellent job.

"The 21 st week of trial was begun with a prosecution witness who had
been with the American Consulate in Stuttgart, Germany, beginning in 1924,
who was asked to state w'hat he could recall of speeches made by Defendants
Schwinn and Kunze at a meeting in Germany, which he had reported to his
superiors. He remembered that they had denounced Communism and Jews;
that no American had been attacked by name, so far as he could remember,
except Congressman Schmelka Dickstein. Defendants, their counsel and the
jury showed amused appreciation of that. The witness seemed to enjoy it too.

" 'Do you believe the German Foreign Institute was organized on inter¬
national lines like the Comintern of the Communists?' The reply was 'No.'
Defendant Jones asked 'Did you ever hear of a law being violated before it was
passed?' There was a prompt and amused ’No.’ The jury apparently liked that.
But the $64 questions were asked by Mr. Frey. Edmondson s attorney, at the
close of the examination. Witness was shown a diary of Ambassador Dodd

220

(from the U. S. to Germany) and asked to read a certain paragraph. Then:
From that document you will note that Hitler ordered in 1935 the dissolution
of all Nazi groups in foreign countries. Would you say anything to the con¬
trary? The answer was 'I know nothing to the contrary.' Then Mr. Prey con¬
tinued, monitored by ray husband:

'Now, Mr. Teller, you were in Germany during the rise of the Nazi
regime and during eight years of actual Hitler control of the country. Did
you ever, in any way at any time, ever hear of any statement or any act which
would lead you to believe chat the Hitler regime intended to make an attempt
to overthrow the Government of the U. S. by force and establish a National
Socialist form of government in this country? The answer was an unhesitating
round and resonant 'NO.’ And that caused a real sensation, One of the ablest
defence lawyers came over and whispered to Attorney Frey: 'You deserve a
'Sieg Heil’ for that.’ And so ended another move designed to make us all
traitors to the U. S.

PROSECUTION DID NOT "COME INTO COURT
WITH CLEAN HANDS"

"Three defense attorneys who have been more or less spectators while the
fight boiled up, have joined the ranks of vigorous defense, and they are rgal
assets. They have been waiting for nearly five months to see for themselves just
what the prosecution had to offer, and now, convinced that the set up is vicious,
are going ‘all out’ for us.

"Defense Counsel Myers for Defendant Hudson is putting new life into
the defense, being an exceedingly able lawyer. In an extended address he told
the court this week that, in his opinion, after long observation and study, he
did not believe any defendant was guilty of the indictment charges; and that
is a long way to go for a lawyer who has been as cautions as Mr. Myers. He
boldly charged that the court was not being fair to defendants in admitting
certain exhibits in evidence. He was very uncomplimentary to the court. When
Prosecutor Rogge protested to the judge against the 'rough time’ the defense
was giving him, Mr. Myers rose and declared: 'Mr. Rogge has not come into
this court with dean hands, and has no legitimate complaint to make.’

"This new defense-vigor had given the 'regulars’ a breathing spell, and
they deserve it. When a prosecution witness was asked to identify Mr. Myers’
client, he, the attorney, directed Defendant Hudson co stand up, saying he was
proud to have him do so.

"Mr. E. Hilton Jackson, dignified dean of the lawyers, excoriated Prose¬
cutor Rogge for giving out interviews to such communistic publications as ’PM’
and the 'New Masses’—which show- Rogge’s real affiliations. After Mr. jack-
son had spoken denouncing Rogge’s policies, the judge reprimanded Rogge.
While this reprimand was being delivered, defendants maintained an admirable
restraint. The marshals of the court and our appointed attorneys often com¬
pliment us on good behavior, saying it makes things easier for them.

"In another argument. Defense Lawyer Gallagher, specialist in Appellate
and Supreme Court procedure, was interrupted by Rogge with ’Counsel is mis¬
quoting the record’—a gratuitous insult. Mr. Gallagher’s voice rose as he
retorted 'I am quoting from the record, and in all my experience before the courts
of the District of Columbia I have never had my honor impugned except by Mr.

2 2 1

Rogge. I don’t know how matters are handled m other jurisdictions, but we
don’t do that way in this one. Mr. Gallagher said and sat like Homer s heroes.
The judge is from another 'jurisdiction.' Some slap-down!

'From what I have written you will be able to judge of the high character
of defense counsel. They have to be very able men to, at a moment's notice, take
up any and every challenge suddenly sprung on them. It makes me dizzy to
follow maneuvers. They seem grimly determined to see that justice shall prevail,
realizing that no country tails until its judiciary fails. Almost daily they declare
that shall not happen it they can prevent it. There can be little doubt that the

hue of the Nation is bound up in the persecution of this odd assortment of

defendants, in view of the inescapable fact that day after day new assaults are
made on the Constitution.

"After lunch on. Wednesday a former member of the Germin-American
Bund was put on the stand by the prosecution supposedly to show the connec¬
tion of that organization with Nazism. The witness was asked what that organ¬
ization's aims were. To fight Communism, defend German-American business¬
men against the Jew boycott, and try to spread facts about National Socialism,

v.as the surprising reply. Rogge asked the witness if he had ever been con-

wued of any crime. Defense counsel were on their feet exclaiming over the
point that Rogge was impcaching his own witness, and declared that they
would take care of any criminal record. They did! From records furnished by
the prosecution, defense counsel established the fact that he had served two
rears for 'imperiling the morals of a minor female child’ and has served for
indecent exposure’ in the Pennsylvania R. R. Station in N. Y. City. You can
well imagine the sensation—and disgust. This is an example of the witnesses the
pioscaition lias pul on the stand—FBI agents, stooges, criminals, ex-convicts,
prejudiced witnesses, cowed Germans fearing concentration camps, etc.

' The 23rd week of the trial indicated that even to the lay mind, this farce
is degenerating: I try to keep notes of important happenings, but sometimes be¬
come so absorbed in this tragedy-comedy drama and even burlesque, that I often
l aid an hour has passed without a line in my diary. Sitting up in front, it is
fascinating to watch the faces of counsel, both sides. Mr. Gallagher has a habit
of rubbing his hands and gleefully winking as he stops cross-examination when
he lias made a telling point, and seems delighted when he has forced the court
into an absurd ruling, as much so as if he lud been given favorable rulings.
Defense Attorney Diliing made an objection one day this week and die judge
said sustained.' Automatically Mr. Diliing replied 'Exception.' and then realized
tlic court had upheld him. The whole court room began to laugh,

"During examination of Defendant Stahrenburg, who had circulated some
anti-war material about six months before Pearl Harbor, by Assistant Prosecutor
Burns, we began to realize that Burns was breaking down. He made many mis¬
takes. blundering and finally turning on defense counsel white with anger,
mouthing a word we could not hear; but instantly several defense lawyers were
on their feet protesting that he had used very improper language, demanding
an apology. Big Defendant Dennis heaved htmseif up and declared: ’Mr. Burns
distinctly said ’bastard.' After lunch Rogge again took over.

"Apropos of the open contempt defense counsel are showing, recalls a state¬
ment made by a friendly marshal of the court. I remarked on how defendants
were wandering all over the court, even out into the hall, and how strict the
marshals were at the beginning. ’You don’t know' what orders we got’ he said.
'Hold these people down. Ge-r tough! So we thought we had a lot of gangsters
lo deal with,’ It .speaks well for the conduct of defendants, for the marshals will
nuw do anything for us within reason,

2 2 2

"We went into court Monday fairly walking on air. Judge Etcher had
been soundly rebuked by the Appelate Court for his sentence of Defense Counsel
Klein for alleged contempt. Its swift action was almost unprecedented. We
asked one of the ablest lawyers in court if we were justified in regarding the
decision portentous, and he replied: '1 know it is. The Washington Bar is
seething with anger at the procedure in this court.'

Roosevelt Smear Attacked

"All day Monday Prosecution's Witness Winter sc heidt was on the stand,
and admitted that Germany did not want war, but a peaceful understanding
with France and England; that she had no design on the U. S.; was working for
white supremacy. None of the statements by this prosecution witness helped
the indictment charge of seditious conspiracy by defendants.

"The next witness was a young soldier who had belonged to the Youth
Movement of the German-American Bund. Under direct examination by the
prosecution he said the Nazis expected all nations to accept their ideology by
education. Then the fact was brought out that he had appeared in de-naturaliza¬
tion proceedings, and feared concentration camp. He had Our sympathy. From
testimony of the prosecution’s own witnesses thus far, it is manifest that the
motivation against us is for our anti-Communism exposures.

"Defense Attorney Powers, for Defendant Pelley, began an attack On
President Roosevelt for his current radio broadcast attack on Pelley s Silver
Shirts, declaring he was trying to influence the jury in the seditious conspiracy-
case The court ordered him to proceed along different lines. Is the President
of the United States the only one who has the right of free speech to smear
these helpless defendants over the air and in the newspapers/' Mr. Powers
angrily demanded, adding 'If so, the people of this country should know it.’
The court upheld Prosecutor Rogge's objection.

"Then Defense Lawyer John Jackson, Jr., rose and declared heatedly that
the President’s denunciation of the 'Silver Shirts was an attack on every defend¬
ant in this cause. He ridiculed the attack, pointing out that defendants could
not be faced with their accuser. He cited Supreme Court decisions dismissing
cases because of such unfavorable newspaper publicity. The judge stopped all
arguments by announcing he would hand down his decision later.

"A prosecution witness by the name of Kempner was then put on the
stand. He was a 'refugee professor’ from Germany. He claims to be an authority
on political economy. It is almost impossible to understand his broken, curious
^English. The prosecution built him into the status of an expert. Defendant
Dennis started the cross-examiation and got Kempner so mad he couldn t speak
in English. Another witness was put on the stand after recess, evidently to give
Kempner time to recover composure. Later, the latter was again put on the
stand, and testified how he had made translation ot Hitler's speeches for the
U. S.' Government. Dennis’ examination made him incoherent again, and that
ended Tuesday’s session.

Prosecution Testimony by Aliens

"The prosecution next put Herman Rauschning. another refugee from
Germany, on the witness stand. Defendant Dennis has read and studied mo>i
of his books on Nazism and political affairs, and he was qualified better than
any one of the defense attorneys to examine this witness. He and Witness

2 2 3

Rauschning enjoyed five hours of academic discussion, the latter testifying that
Hitler came to power by nomination of Hindenburg and election by the people,
not by force.

"Our attorneys tell us that admission of evidence- 'provisionally 1 is a courc
confession of doubt that such evidence can be proved. And that sort of admission
continues to be practiced on most of the evidence presented by the prosecution.
The failure of the prosecution to show incarcerated defendants to be danger¬
ous criminals has turned the tide in their favor, and they are being treated more
as human beings, instead of being brutally handled as before. The real cause
of the transformation which has taken place, however, is Defendant Elizabeth
Dilling, who has performed miracles. She has been to Congress about the bad
treatment given them, has flayed authorities responsible, and has seen to- it that
they had one decent meal daily. Now, all c-ight of them get all they can eat.
One of them told me that he had a headache because he had eaten too much.
'That blessed Elizabeth Dilling feeds us too well at times’ he explained. They
love her—and should.

"In the 25th week of the trial defense counsel took over the cross-examina¬
tion of Prosecution Witness Rauschning, and developed that his affiliations in
this country were Jews. Greenburger & Spies were the two lawyers who spon¬
sored the entrance into the U. S. of Rauschning; Leon Lewis, of B’nai B'rith,
with his assistant Joe Roos, came into the picture, as did Zukor, Koepel, and
Selznick of the movies. Paramount Studios.had Rauschning supervise anti-Nazi
pictures. Defendant Dilling asked 'Wouldn’t it have been more honorable for
you to have stayed in Danzig and fought the Nazis? The reply ‘It is more
healthy to live for a principle than to die for it,' caused a raucus laugh. Even the
judge smiled. Under questioning by our attorney, Mr. Frey, Rauschning admitted
that 'a man could be anti-Semitic and yet not be a Nazi.’ Mr. Frey then asked if
he had ever read the Constitution, and whether the word 'Democracy' was con¬
tained in it. The witness admitted that 'Democracy’ was not mentioned; but he
insisted that we had a democratic way of life. Prosecutor Rogge is having a hard
tune proving that the government of the United States is a democracy-form. The
1^28 U. S. Army Training manual says 'The Government of the U. S. is NOT
a Democracy, but a Republic.' Mr. Frey got across a lot to the jury, and there
was much smiling at my husband, who sat beside his attorney as mentor. Rogge
couldn't object to everything, and the lid came off when Defense Counsel Dill¬
ing offered 'The Protocols of the Elders of Zion' for identification. The judge
upheld objections.

"The examination of the witness by Mr. Frey was interrupted by recess,
and Defendant Dennis rushed over to my husband and tried to stop the Jewish
exposure questions which opened up the real problem. Mr. Dennis was told
that this subject was the reason we were all in court, and rebuttal was going to
be pushed to the limit by Defendant Edmondson.

"Something Smells Bad"

"Prosecution Witness Kempner was back on the stand at the week-end, and
when the microphone was put Before him to speak he answered one question
through the high-geared machine: 'Stink.' Following the most hysterical laugh¬
ter, he explained 'It means something smells bad.’ Off we went again—and a
lawyer behind me remarked 'I'll say it does!' One lawyer protested to the court
(hat the witness should translate -words as he found them and not the way he
felt Hitler meant them; but the judge 'over-ruled.'

2 2 4

Bv the end of the 26th week almost everyone seemed to be convinced,
from the testimony, that Kempner and Rauschning were largely responsible for
the language employed in both the indictment and bill of particulars The
phraseology was almost identical. It is a terrible thing when two discredited
refugee aliens can indict patriotic defendants in a document designed to deprive
them of liberty and citizenship.

’’Prosecutor Rogge has abandoned the 'Nazi Conspiracy' terms, substituting
'Nazi Movement,’ supposed to include the world. But not one of the prosecu¬
tion witnesses have testified that there was, to employ the language ot the indict¬
ment, a 'publicly announced program to destroy democracy everywhere in the
world and substitute a Nazi form of government in the V. S.'

"Kempner testified that one proof of Hitler’s treason to the Weimar Repub¬
lic was that he ordered the military forces to have no dealings with Marxism or
a democratic form of government—implying that democracy and commun.sm
are one and the same thing. Lawyer after lawyer rose and beseeched the court
not to try the Nazi regime, saying Rogge had tried seven months to prove a
world conspiracy, and had failed. 'We now ask the court to direct the prosecution
to tie defendants into that conspiracy.’ The judge directed Rogge to procee .
At one time the prosecutor jumped up and whined the defense is trying to
attack the veracity of our witness.' A young attorney back of me immediately
rose and said 'that is the object of cross-examinat.on.’ The voice of the judge
was weak, and he looked badly, but he ordered over-rulings continually.

"Dunne Defense Attorney Wm. J. Powers’ examination of Kempner he
brought out the point the latter had been a judge in the Jewish section of Ber¬
lin- that out of the 3000 lawyers Kempner said were m Berlin, 200 were Jews
He’asked the witness if he remembered a celebrated case in Berlin of * Jewish
gentleman* throwing the hat and overcoat of an American attorney on the floor
Of a restaurant; th£ when he got out of the hospital the ']tmsh gentleman
sued the American lawyer, The witness did not recall that case. The American
lawyer, Mr. Powers stated, was William J. Powers, then General Counsel tor
General Motors Corp. in Berlin.

"On Thursday Defense Counsel St. George elicited the point that Kempner
was born in Poland. 'Was your mother Jewish?’ he asked. 'She was German, he
replied. 'Was she German-Jewish?’ The reply 'She was German was repeated.
And the jury began to laugh at the repetition. Kempner was asked it the tact
that he was a Jew influenced his testimony. He answered No, without denying
that he was Jewish. He looks and acts like a Jew.

"The ’evidence’ of Rauschning was admitted 'provisionally over repeated
objection by defense. At one point, when defense counsel was insisting that
the prosecution had not proven the indictment charges, Prosecutor Rogge jumped
to his feet and vehemently declared that the Government believed it had proven
its case against certain defendants, and was merely awaiting further disclosures to
see how many others could be tied into the conspiracy to undermine the morale
of the armed forces.

"A dozen defense attorneys rose, one saying: We accept Rogge s bluff.
Let him take the case to the jury right now. We are willing.' But Rogge de¬
clared he had said only certain’ defendants, and intended to take his time as to

others.

"One amusing situation has arisen which may have repercussions later.
Defendants and defense counsel and members of the jury congregate m a little
cafe during lunch recess by the court. There they fraternize, sitting together, and

2 2 5

the place is a bedlam of laughter and talking. On strict orders I have stayed
away from the jurors, but on Thursday one of them stopped and showed me a
Roosevelt button he was wearing upside down, I laughingly remarked that that
was a signal of distress. This Roosevelt Administration has had the country
upside down for many years, so I am wearing the button in the proper way.’
One of the prosecutor's spies was seen in the cafe writing down names of jurors
and defendants sitting together. It could cause a mistrial if the prosecution wants
it chat way.

"The 27th week of the 'Mess Trial' (new name) ended yesterday with
the Jewish Refugee Kempner still on the witness stand. Incidentally, history will
record that not one native-born witness has appeared against us; that the liberty,
health, happiness and in some cases, the lives of 26 American patriots will de*
pend on the judging, by the jury, of the alien 'evidence!' Not one scrap of real
evidence has been thus far introduced in support of this prejudiced indictment.

"When Defense Attorney Dilling was pressing the witness about his ex¬
alted biographies, Rogge intervened and declared the witness was 'too modest’
to have furnished much of the material. A derisive hoot went up, and the jury
grinned. When one lawyer stressed the point that nothing the Kempner witness
testified to had anything to do with the indictment charge that defendants had
undermined the morale of the U. S. military forces, Rogge rose and angrily made
the statement that the charge is disloyalty to a democratic form of government.’
Whereupon furore broke out, and one attorney shouted 'Mr. Rogge just isn't
honest. That is the charge, and he knows it,’ He demanded that the indictment
be read into the record. The judge denied the motion. He then demanded that
the record show he took a strong exception to the court's gaveling. This is the
first time he has reacted in that manner. He as hitherto been most meticulously
careful in his court demeanor. One thing is sure, the defense is not jittery. The
defense attorneys know they are on the solid rock of the Constitution.

Court Conduct Boldly Challenged

"On Tuesday Mr. Frey, our attorney, took over, and waked up the court¬
room, He had pages of questions, carefully prepared by my husband, which
were all on the subject of Anti-Semitism and Communism. This time he stuck to
the questions—and they were deadly. He had the courtroom in an uproar, and
the defense counsel, with few exceptions, backed him. One of them muttering
'Pour it on, Bert.’ Mr. Frey is popular with the jury, the defendants and their
counsel. But I sat in a cold chill, for I never knew where his enthusiasm would
lead him. When Rogge objected frequently, Mr. Frey heatedly ejaculated: 'Now,
Your Honor, I have a right to ask those questions about the Jewish Problem.
Defendants didn’t bring up that subject—the prosecution did. Mr. Rogge objects
to my right to ask these questions and Your Honor sits up there and sustains
him.’

"I groaned 'Lord, thats done it.' But the judge, who also seems to like Mr.
Frey, Calmly said: 'Mr. Frey, do you wish co withdraw that remark about the
court?' Mr. Frey explained that he really had not meant contempt of court, but
that he was very tired of Rogge’s continual objections and of being over-ruled.
The matter passed off that way, but the courtroom and the jury apparently
thought Mr. Frey was going to be 'cracked down.' It seemed to us a narrow
escape. We begged him to be more careful. To the question as to whether or
not a patriotic American could be anti-Communist and anti-Semitic without
being a Nazi, Witness Kempner replied 'Yes' before Rogge could object.

"Then Prosecutor Rogge rose and declared in a rage that defendants used

2 2 6

the term 'patriotic' for -fascist.' There was a mighty protest to that, and he court
'truck the remark from the record. Everybody's radiator boded over with plenty
of steam. I suspicion Rogge knows he is losing. He blew up completely when
Mr Frey, talking loudly and rapidly brought out rhe point that Rogge has sa
on the same platform with Communist Leader EarlBrowder in a Red Front
meeting in New York. ML Frey was closer to the jury than Rogge, and they
heard it, and were laughing.

'Defense attorney St. George rose and said that the subversive forces m
this country were doing exactly what they were trying to convict us of doing
I wish you could have seen the delighted grins and expressions of approval
from defendants. Although the Jewish Question is the heart or this prosecution,
the efforts made to suppress it cannot fad to be evaluated by the jury.

"When a Catholic attorney asked Witness Kcmpner about freedom of re¬
ligion in the Reich and Russia, (he latter admitted that no religion was permitted
m the Soviet; that there was in the Reich, but that priests and ministers were
not free. 'Did not the Nazis profess Jesus Christ, Savior or Mankind, asked this
lawyer, crossing himself and bowing at the words Jesus Christ. Twice he
pressed the question, making the same gesture; and finally Kempner fa e blood-
suffused, shouted: 'No. they said he was a Jew. The attorney .should- hen have
asked: Did not the Jews themselves renounce and crucify Christ. But that point
was lost. It was very moving, emotionally.

A Wrong Search and Seizure Exposed

"Kempner admitted that the Jewish Question was a world-wide problem:
that it was purely political; that the trouble in Germany was first made b>
riots and power-grabbing of Communists; and then control was brought about

by the Nazis.

"We were much pleased in the 28 th week of the battle, to find that de¬
fense attorneys, almost solidly anti-New Deal, were even more aggressive and
pitched into the prosecution with renewed vigor, notwithstanding Roosevelt was
re-elected. I was much intrigued also to find that members of the jury were just
as friendly as ever, if not more so. The continual introduction mto the trial Oi
Anti-Semitism and Anti-Communism has evidently had an enlightening effect.

"On Monday the search and seizure of our papers on July 24 1942, in
California, came up for hearing, and lasted until Thursday. Details of the arrest
were thoroughly aired. The facts are: While I was saying 'goodnight to neigh¬
bors who had been enoying a cool evening ride with us in our car, I saw my
husband walk back to another car parked in our roadway. I went to find ou
what it was about, and my husband told me he was under arrest on a charge 0
seditious conspiracy. The announcement shocked and stunned me so much that
I turned and went into our home. I saw my husband put the car m the garage,
and the men then came into the house, Deputy Marshall first, my husband sec¬
ond, the Other deputy last, the correct order after arrest.

"I regained some composure by that time, and we talked for about 1 s
minutes. Since it was too late to get bail, I was told where to bring it at Sacra¬
mento next day. Then the Deputy Marshal said: 'I shall have to search your
quarters.' Since arrest had already been made there was no resistance. l-pon
demand for correspondence files, my husband turned them over. They then
returned to the living room from my husband s bedroom and, despite \chcnx-nt
protests from me, literally stripped my personal desk. They took intimate letters
among them one my mother wrote just before her death.

"They started for the Sacramento jail about 10:30 P.M. The next dav,
Saturday, J reached the marshal's office as soon as I could and posted $5000
bail. We returned home. I was so ill that my physician kept me under opiates
for three days.

"In the courtroom the marshal testified that h,e did not make the arrest in
the driveway, but in the house, which was a lie. He said he was ’invited’ into
the house, another lie. He asserted that the car was not put away before enter¬
ing the house, but afterwards, He said he read the arrest warrant in the house,
whereas there was no arrest-warrant nor search warrant. The truth is that he
showed a telegram calling for the arrest. Both deputies admitted that they had
no search warrant. The marshal said he had an arrest-warrant issued, returned
July 24. We were able to prove in court that the arrest-warrant was produced
a: removal hearings on Oct. 5, 1942, and that it was dated July 31. So, accord¬
ing to that statement, it was impossible for him to have served such arrest-
warrant July 24. He used the telegram as authority for the search, according to

his testimony.

*

"The testimony was before the jury, and our attorney, Mr. Frey, exposed
the marshal as a liar when his assistant deputy took the" stand. The assistant
testified that the car had been garaged, as stated by me, before they had entered
the house. When the marshal was returned to the witness stand, he changed
his testimony, and said he 'thought' the car had been put away after entry. The
effect on the jury and other defense attorneys was unmistakable.

"The marshal explained his search of my desk on the ground that I told
him my husband used the desk at times, when the truth was—and I testified to
if—he was told that 1 alone used said desk. They both admitted that I protested
strongly, and that my husband also protested.

Arrest Deputy "Takes a Walk"

One defense attorney asked the Marshal if he had a certified copy of the
arrest warrant. He said 'No.' To be legal a warrant for search must be certified.
He said the defendant 'just handed' to him all material taken from the latter's
room. 'How- many pieces of material were taken?' he was asked. 'From two to
three thousand,' he answered, The attorney paused and smiled. He counted the
pieces taken. They numbered 18. He then added sarcastically that to get 18
pieces out of two or three thousand was nothing short of amazing.

"On Wednesday the assistant deputy was sitting outside the courtroom
in the outer hall. When one of the court attendants told him how things were
going, he grabbed his hat and left saying 'This is no place for me. I doiVt want
to go back on that stand. And that was that! Decision was reserved.

"During the defense arguments one attorney was ruled as 'out of order’ by
the court, whereupon his voice in a shout declared: 'I have been practicing law
in Washington for 35 years, to find that I don’t know anything about law.' The
court said: 'Mr. Bilbrey, you are out of professional "bounds.’ Mr. Biibrey
snapped: I don t know whether there are any professional bounds in this court.
I am held not to know the difference between argument and objection, and I
ask that 1 be dismissed from this case.’ The judge said ’Motion denied.’ Defence
Counsel Powers, after bc-ing gaveied down, shouted: '1 object and protest
agarnst this gaveling. There seems to be perjury in tins court, and something
ought to be done about it.' Ail he got was ’Motion denied.' b

2 2 8

'‘Henry D. Allen was put on the witness stand by the prosecution. Mr. Allen
testified about a meeting between Defendant Winrod and Bund Leader Kuhn
with the idea of co-operation, but each wanted to do things their Own way, and
the conference ended unpleasantly. So much for conspiracy.

"The 29th week of the ordeal proved to be important and impressive. The
dam broke. Informed defence attorneys directed the flood of damaging testimony
to where it would do the most good. The violent objections of Rogge were
swept away by the force of the torrent. liven the judge failed to sustain him at
certain points.

"There can now be no doubt in the minds of che jury that Communism is
Jewish-directed and financed. Prosecution Witness Alien gave measured damn¬
ing testimony calmly and dearly, and when he broke down later and wept over
his injured son, the stark truth burst out and the effect was overwhelming!.

"Despite Prosecutor Rogge’s efforts, the testimony of Witness Allen was
very favorable to the defendants. He said not one defendant, to his persona!
knowledge, had any idea of destroying our republican form of government, but
all were struggling to protect it. The battle was fascinating. Rogge lost!

No "Seditious Conspiracy" Testimony

"When -queried as to his experience in regard to co-operation among the
defendants he visited, Witness Allen said 'there wasn't any.’ Outside of the
fact that they were all exposing Jewish Communism, they agreed on nothing;
everyone insisted on proceeding in his own way. Seditious conspiracyr 1

"Almost two hours were taken in arguing against the admission of De¬
fendant Deatherage’s material, many defence counsel declaring that most of the
matter was regarding the ages-old Jewish Question; but the judge finally ad¬
mitted it 'provisionally.’

"The prosecution had been trying to show' up Henry Hamilton Beamish,
member of a prominent English family who was imprisoned under the in¬
famous 18-B Act of Great Britain, as a great villain; but the laugh is on Pro¬
secutor Rogge because Beamish was unconditionally released in July, 1943,
with no stigma of crime. One defence counsel referred to Beamish as a patriot;
so you can see we have sold them on our truthful reporting.

"Defence Counsel Wm. j. Powers, who is a joy to us, rose one day and
declared he did not join in the protest against the length of the trial, for he
finds the Washington climate agreed with him, has opened a branch office
here, has brought on a large part of his law library and is beginning to speak
with a southern drawl. That is but one incident showing that many attorneys,
though daily losing monc-y, have by no means lost their sense of humor. Mr.
Powers is a walking dictionary on constitutional law—and he loses no oppor¬
tunity to 'throw chat book' at the prosecution.

"Mr. Powers asked Witness Allen how much he was being paid to testify.
Mr. Allen answered $4.50 per day. Mr. Powers remarked that that did not seem
fair, for Witness Kempner said he got $25 a day plus expenses; but then he
added meditatively 'Refugee Kempner came at a great sacrifice since he stated
on the stand that his consultation fees were $75.’

"Prosecutor Rogge jumped to his feet and angrily protested, saying Mr.
Powers was 'trying to make a hostile witness more hostile.’ At that Witness

2 2 9

Alien reijuesiL-J the court to grant him permission to make a statement, which
was denied. Upon Mr. Powers’ insistence Mr. Allen was finally permitted to
say that he was here to tell the truth, and that was what he had been doing;
that he resented the prosecution's charge chat he was hostile.

Courtroom Electrified by Witness

"It was on Wednesday when Witness Allen electrified the courtroom.
Defence counsel St. George asked the witness if he had ever been personally
injured in riots precipitated on the West Coast during his anti-Connmunist
meetings. He recounted a terrible beating to which he and his son had been
subjected. He himself was in the hospital for a week. He said he knew his son
was in the same hospital, but had not been informed as to the latter's injuries
until his release. Then' he testified, 'I found out that besides being beaten into
insensibility there had been a rupture of my son's ... 'at this point he broke
down and'sobbed. Instantly a heart-rending cry of ‘O, Daddy' came from the
other side of the courtroom, and his youngest daughter rushed over to him
threw her arms around him, put her head down on his shoulder and wept with
him. Then his wife and other daughter came to the witness chair.

"We were all frozen in our seats, and there wasn't a dry eye in the jury,
among defendants and defence attorneys. One of our counsel asked the judge
for a recess to permit the witness to recover. This was granted, and we all left
the room emotionally moved to the depths. Evidence of shock and pity was on
the faces of jurors, as I looked at them with my own eyes swimming in tears.

"The last three benches on the left side of the courtroom had been filled
with Jews. When we returned to the courtroom after recess, no Jews were
seen. They fear emotion because it develops violence at times.

"Returned to the witness stand Mr. Allen stated that the left eyeball of
his son had been gouged and ruptured so badly that it had to be removed and
he is now wearing a glass eye. After trying to enlist for combat duty he was now
helping to train flyers in a mid-west training camp,

"Can vou imagine what a scene like that has done to the cause of the
persecutors? Especially as Mr. Allen had been summoned as their own witness
Later Defence Attorney Jackson Sr. said to me: 'Rogge is dead. He doesn't
know it yet. All chat remains is to bury him and deliver the funeral oration, and
I would like to do it.’

"Later, when we personally expressed sympathy and horror to Mrs. Allen,
she told me that they expected more trouble because of what Mr. Allen had
said on the stand. ‘But’ she said 'We are determined to go through with it.’ Mr.
Allen goes back on the stand next Monday. One of the defence attorneys was
talking with one of the jurors, and 'wondered' how the jury was ’taking' some
of Allen’s testimony. 'What are YOU worrying about ? 1 the juror remarked. 'He's
YOUR witness, isn’t he?’ How’s that?

"Here is the 30th week of the Rogge prosecution. Contrary to proper pro¬
cedure, he is presenting much new material largely from testimony before two
Grandjuries, given by Witness Allen; but thus far Mr. Allen has been able to
justify himself. The most cautious and dignified defence lawyers are now show¬
ing their contempt of the court. The looks of disgust on their faces, shaking
of hands between them, after adverse rulings by the judge, cannot fail to have
an effect on the jury.

2 3 0

No Undermining of Soldier Monde

"Mr. Allen testified without reservation that not one defendant he knew in
the anti-Communist crusade ever had any idea of trying to corrupt the morale
of the military forces; to the contrary, they wanted a strong army and navy to
protect the United States from a communist take-over of the Nation. Mr. Allen
also testified that the jew lawyer with the military commission who ejected
him from his California home, told him that he was 'a Jew-baiter and a Nazi.'

"Mr. Allen testified that Elizabeth Dilling’s 'Red Network’ had been used
as a text book by the famous ’Red Squad' of Los Angeles which had done im¬
portant work in breaking up subversive Communist meetings until it was sup¬
pressed. Thousands rioted, he said, and the frenzied 'Jewish faces' screamed in
a terrifying manner. He identified pictures of the worst disturbances.

"Rogge objections sustained by the court were apparently so unfair and
without legal basis that Defence Lawyer John Jackson, a meticulously correct
attorney, moved for a mis-trial on the grounds that defendants were being
denied due process of law. Other defence attorneys supported him. Defence
Lawyer Powers declared 'the wholesale denial of due process rights is so gross
that I join in Mr. Jackson's motion.' It was denied.

"Our attorney, Mr. Frey, offered the Bible for identification, was opposed
by Rogge, and was sustained by the court. Defence Attorney St. George called
all defense counsel to leave the courtroom in protest against railroading oi
defendants. One lawyer said 'the court can put us in jail for that.’ Mr. St.
George declared that he was willing to go. to jail if he could protect these in¬
nocent defendants’ from being denied their constitutional rights! This reflects
the righteous wrath of members of the Bar regarding the disgraceful procedure'
in this 'mess trial.’

"Witness Allen ended his court ordeal on Monday, and emerged victor.
Mr. Allen testified again that all defendants he knew worked separately except
'for the good of the cause.’ Rogge would not permit him to say what that com¬
mon cause was. But the question was later answered on cross-examination. The
repiy was 'to rid the United States of Jewish Communism.’

"Mr. Allen circumvented che prosecution when Rogge handed to him
copies of his Dies Committee testimony and that before two Grand Juries,
asking if it was true. Mr. Alien replied: 'I may have said chat then when I was
under great pressure and duress. I had been threatened and intimidated. But
what I am now testifying to is the truth and nothing but the truth. -

Prosecutor Rogge Gets a Shock

"Prosecutor Rogge would stand and stare at him, then turn away, and
produce another document, with the same result. The witness repudiated much
previous testimony. There was no doubt in the minds of many listeners that he
was really telling the whole truth at this time. Evidently, Rogge could do
nothing about it. He was completely baffled. He did not dare try to impeach
Mr. Allen, who had so obviously won the sympathies of the jury. Mr. Allen
told us later that he had seen his chance to ’right some wrongs,' and help the
defense at the same time; that he decided to do so regardless of consequences.

"On Monday the Deatherage exhibits were turned over to the jury. They
took their time. Tuesday’s session was a weird one. Silence all day except for
announced recesses. Defendants wandered in and out of the courtroom at will.
On Wednesday the jury was still absorbed in the exhibits. The judge swiveled

2 3 1

I

!

around in his chair at times, held his arms over his head, from time to time
mopping his face—yet it was too cool in the courtroom for many of us. In
response to an inquiring gesture. I saw his personal secretary form her lips to
the word 'sick.' But the judge stayed in the courtroom. Finally the jury
concluded their exhaustive examination of the 'evidence • against Defendant
Deatherage.

The following speaks for itself:

SEDITION TRANSCRIPT A LA RICHER

By Ellis 0. Jones, 1944 Mass-Case Defendant
(Copyright, 1951)

Mr Worm:
The Court:
Mr. Worm;
The Court:

Your Honor, there’s a question—
Overruled 1 .

May I offer a suggestion?

Overruled!

If you don't be very quiet.

It's contempt oc very nigh it

For incitement unto not.

Overruled!

Mr. Small:
The Court:
Mr. Small:
The Court:-

Now, Your Honor, my objection—
Overruled!

Just a trifling correction—

Overruled!

As to all you other sitters

I will fine die first that tirters.

For today I've got the jitters.
Overruled:

Mr. Meek
The Court
Mr. Meek
The Court

Please the court, I’ve go; a notion—
Overruled!

That I'd like to make a motion.
Overruled!

If vou dare to sneeze or cough or
Make an offer of a proffer,

I will jail you as a scottc-r.

Overruled!

Mr. Weak
The Court
Mr. Weak
The Court

Please Your Honor, may I mention—
Overruled!

But Your Honor, our contention—
Overruled!

At a sign of independence

On behalf of the defendants

I will summon the attendants.
Overruled!

Mr. Fogg
The Court
Mr. Fogg
The Court

As to this new situation—

Overruled!

May T hand you a citation?

Overruled!

There’s a certain individual

By the name of Fanny Biddle

Says to grill you on the griddle
Overruled!

Mr. Hazy
The Court
Mr. Hazy
The Court

Now this latest court decision—

: Overruled!

: Puts the whole case in derision.

; Overruled

Never mind. My ruling newish

And mv whole demeanor shrewj.sh
Are because you're anti-Jewish.
Overruled!

2 3 2

Mr, Tyro:
The Court:
Mr. Tyro:
The Court:

Please the Court, I'd like a hearing—
Overruled!

But this poini requires clearing.
Overruled!

There is nothing to unravel.

It you don': shut up your cavil,
l will smack you with the gave!.
Overruled!

Mr. Rogge:
The Court:
Mr. Rogge:
The Court:

Speaking for the prosecution—
It's sustained,

M’c believe the best solution—

■ It's sustained.

State your motion, Mr. Rogge.
Be it sound or be it soggy.

Be it clear or be it foggy,

It's sustained.

JUDGE HIGHER DIES

"At 10 A.M. on Thursday our Defence Counsel Mr. Frey telephoned us
reporting the death of Chief Justice Either, and said we need not go to court.
As though I would miss that session. The first comment by my husband was
'God has taken a hand in this battle.’ As we stepped off the street car going to
court we met one of the defence attorneys, who quoted 'De Alortuis ml nisi
bonum.' We assured him that we did not need his warning. 'Well' he remarked,
'We can shake hands about it anvwav.'

"The court was opened by Justice Proctor in a very subdued atmosphere.
The defendants had grim faces. Justice Proctor officially announced the death,
and set the following Thursday. Dec. 7, for further action. When the short
session ended, defendants and their counsel met immediately in a long strictly
private conference. It was decided that the next move would be left to the
prosecution; that the defence would take no action until after next Thursday's
session of the court,

"One thing seems certain, no other judge in the District of Columbia will
take the case again. An outsider would have to be called, and he might be as
bad, or umrse, than Judge Eicher.

"New York's 'uptown edition of the communist Daily Worker.' PM, pub¬
lished a paragraph complimentary to defendants, to wit:

" The air of the courtroom appeared one of sincere mourning for the late
Chief Justice. If any of the defendants felt relief at the chance they would get
a mis-trial, their faces didn't show it.'

"Much credit is due these harrassed, weary and persecuted defendants to
have a report made about them by such a notorious smear-sheet. That our con¬
duct was eminently correct is completely vindicated by this publication. Any
'disorder' which may have occurred in the past was due to wild-man Rogge and
his outrageous attempts to undermine the Constitution.

"A friendly newspaperman told my husband of an 'off the record' inter¬
view he had just had with Rogge, who, he said, is 'mad as hell over Either'*
death,' charging that the defence had ’killed the judged Rogge is reported as
trying to impound the trial records, so defence counsel can't use them. He has
declared the case is not going to be dropped. One defence attorney asked ;nv
husband .if lie thought the case would be dropped. He replied not now. I know
my Jews,’ The attorney commented 'I believe you are right.'

2 3 3

l 'We feel sort of dazed over this interposition of Providence. We had
braced ourselves for continued resistance and fight. Now, the necessity for
'forward march’ has been removed. We seem to be temporarily off balance.

"One of the most prominent of our defence lawyers said to me: '1 just
would not have believed if my best friend had told me of the preposterous
things which happened at the mistrial. I could not have imagined how such
judicial procedure could take place. But I saw and heard with my own eyes
and ears this dreadful perversion of justice.’ He also told me of relays of
Washington lawyers who had from time to time attended the Eicher court
sessions, and were as convinced as he was.

"The 32nd week of the Roosevelt Administration mass-persecution finally
halted officially Dec. 7, 1944. Defendants and counsel sac in solemn silence
awaiting the appearance of Justice Proctor in the courtroom at Washington,
There was no exultation visible, for we had not achieved our objective of com¬
plete legal vindication. Nevertheless, all the plot-attacks against us thus far have
been ’licked.’ Proceedings were conducted on strict lines. The marshal in charge
announced that there was to be no whispering; doors were to be locked; no
one could leave the room until the judge had delivered his pronouncements; no
one was to stand up, and any demonstration would not be permitted.

Court Declares "Mis-trial”

"Justice Proctor used no voice amplifier, but the room was deathly still.
And we heard his voice distinctly. He had no authority to dismiss the case, and
was acting today in accord with a banc of justices who, last week, sat in
consultation.

"A transcript of what Justice Proctor said, taken by my husband in short¬
hand, is very interesting. I think it is the only shorthand report made of that
address. Justice Proctor said trial could not continue unless all defendants agreed
to do so under another judge, and that a roll call would then be taken to learn
their decisions. In a way we felt sad when voice after voice recorded a firm
’NO,’ for we all felt we were saying farewell to a jury that was with us heart
and soul, and we did not know what the future held for us in that respect.

"After almost every defendant had voted against continuance, Justice
Proctor announced a mis-trial and discontinuance of the case. He then thanked
and dismissed the jury, directing them to leave the courthouse immediately,
asking them not to talk to anyone as to their opinions. Our counsel said that was
an unusual procedure, for juries have a right to say all they wish after a case
has been discontinued. They believed the judge had yielded to a request from
the prosecution, which knew the jury would want to shake hands with us, and
might have talked. As we left the courtroom a rumor spread that one juror had
told a criminal court justice that the jury would have handed in a 'Not Guilty’
verdict for all defendants in fifteen minutes. I can believe that.

"Justice Proctor delivered high praise of all defence counsel, saying they
had upheld ’the highest traditions of the legal profession,’ and that the public
owed them a great debt of gratitude. Note that these are the men whom Rogge
accused of having 'killed the judge.’ We defendants were indeed happy to
hear this laudation go into the record. But it would be almost impossible to
recompense defence attorneys for their services and huge financial loss over the
period of 7y 2 months of devotion to the Constitution.

"This ending has been a body blow to the Department of 'Injustice/
What the prosecution will do in the future, is not known. This enemy of ours

2 34

IS endowed with 'imphuable hatred of all mankind,' to use the words ol His¬
torian Gibbon in ht.s ’Decline and ball of the Roman Empire. We are stdl held
under bail.

"It remains to be seen whether addenda will be written. While we did not
win the official 'Not Guilty' for which we fought; still, a great victory has
reallv been had by us--as well as a defeat for the Jew-Communist enemy al¬
most as great as that which my husband won in New 'iork, when Jews, afraid
to face truth, retreated and begged the court by a roundabout amicus curaie
petition to dismiss the group libel charges against him as without warrant in
law,’ in furtherance- of justice,' in the public good’ and as 'a violation ot the
free press guarantee of the U. S. Constitution'—which rock fell upon and broke
flit back of the mass-case indictment in Washington, thanks to a magnificent
defence by 'the immortal twenty’ lawyers who went ’all out' for justice."

The following diary of January 21, 194% written at our California home,
reported ending Washington incidentals overlooked previously:

"The fine record we had all made with the correspondents of the great
press services toward the end was a real reward, although they were not allowed
to print the proceedings as they saw them; but they showed their sympathy and
friendliness.

"Ann Hicks, of the United Press, asked me, after the mis-trial was de¬
clared: 'How do you feel about this, Mrs. Edmondson?’

"I replied that my husband and I were very sorry to have it end as it did,
that we were well satisfied with the way things were going, and that every day
was proving our innocence.

"She gravely said she thought that that was the way we felt.

"Dr. Frank Kingdon, himself a radical, who daily reported the trial on the
air, was finally barred from mentioning it because, it was said, his reports were
too favorable to defendants.

''Our victorv—and it was a victory—was gained on the prosecution’s own
time. The defence did not have to prove innocence by rebuttal. We were forced
to accept the gage thrown down by the prosecution and we defeated him on his
own battle ground.

"When we started for Washington last March I told my husband that we
would have to have miracles if we were not to be imprisoned.. We got miracles—
for they were beyond human management.

"Without vanity but with humility I make the statement that the defence
lawyers learned to respect and defer to my husband's wise and relevant sug¬
gestions, and treated him with real affection. Defence attorneys Gallagher,
Powers, Grant and St. George, rose personally to his defence, explaining that
they were not speaking for their clients but "for Mr. Edmondson." Mr. Kelly,
former Assistant Prosecuting Attorney for the District of Columbia, voluntarily
pffered his services—'anything I can do for you, Mr. Edmondson, let me
know.’ We sold our innocence—and our Cause—to these keen courageous men,
all but three of whom were unpaid.

"Mr. George E. Sullivan, prominent Washington attorney, counsel for the
American Coalition of Patriotic Societies, had offered to appear as a character
witness for my husband, as well as an authority on Jewish Communist sub¬
versions. He shook hands with us warmly, and said to me. I have heard the

2 3 5

finest reports of the dignified conduct and courage of you and your husband
and of the highly intelligent manner in which he directed his defence. You both
played a large part in maintaining the high morale of defendants and in con¬
vincing counsel of Mr. Edmondson’s innocence. I cannot express myself too
strongly in this commendation.' That is something of which to be proud.

"We met the enemy in New York City and Washington—and defeated
him. He may try again! Maybe not!”

The prosecution in the seditious conspiracy case indicated that defendant's thesis
that "Communism is Jewish" is false. In rebuttal Defendant Edmondson prepared as
below a double-column comparison court "exhibit" documented.

DEADLY PARALLEL

COMMUNIST INTERNATIONALE
Objectives and Strategy
World Dictatorship Political- Economic

"Father of Modern Communism" Karl
Marx.

Communism is International.
Communism is anti-national.

Communism wars on Fascism. "The es¬
sence of Fascism is Nationalism, while- that
of Bolshevism is Internationalism."—"Ger¬
many and England" by N. H. Webster.

Communism denounces anti-Semitism;
Communist Russia has outlawed it.

Communists are parasitic, unable to live
outside well-to-do nations.

Communism is a materialistic doctrine.

Communism is ALIEN to national des¬
tinies.

Communists are a noisy minority in all
nations.

Communism srands for racial equality.

JEWISH INTERNATIONALE
Objective and Strategy

World Dominion via "Chosen People"
Ideology.

Karl Marx was son of a Jewish Rabbi.
"Stranger Than Fiction," by Rabbi Lewis
Browne, says "Jewish histones rarely men¬
tion the name of Karl Marx, though in his
life and spirit he was far truer to the Mis¬
sion of Isrjel than most of those who arc
forever talking of it. His book. "Capital"
.is called the Bible of the Socialist move¬
ment."

Jewry is International.

Jewish Internationalism is anti-nariona!.
'Modern' Nationalism . . is our CHIEF

ENEMY." — Race-Nation-Rehgion" by
Rabbi Sol. B. Freehof. "Nationalism is a
danger for the Jewish People." — Chicago
Jewish Sentinel. Sep. 23. 1936. "Jews are
tine only cosmopolitan people, and in this
capacity are acting as a SOLVENT of
H.tliorui differences" — London Jewish
World, Feb. 9-16. 1883.

jews continually attack Fascism.

jews wage war continually on anti-Sem¬
itism everywhere. "Anti-Semitism is the
antagonistic attitude produced in the non-
Jew BY the Jewish group." — Jewish
Scientist Albert Einstein. Collier s Weekly.
Nov. 26. 1938. "Tire general causes of anti-
Semitism have always resided in Israel
itself." — Jewish Author Bernard Lazure.
"The Jewish Question exists wherever Jews
live in perceptible numbers ... it is a
world political question."—Jewish Leader
Theodor HerzI.

History shows that Jews are notoriously
parasitic, and unable to run a nation of
their own.

Jews are notorously materialistic.

"The jew is the perpetual alien."—From
Organized Anti-Semitism in the U. S.. by
Donald Strong, 19dl. "Jews are everywhere
to a large extent, ALIENS. 1 — "You Gen¬
tiles" by Maurice Samuel.

Jews are a noisy minority in all nations.

Jewish leaders constantly call for racial
equality.

2 3 7

Ci i in i'll ti ms ill promotes civil war by gen¬
era; 'trikes, mo and sabotage.

Communism regiments the masses.

Communists promote pacifism to get
control.

Communists refuse to amalgamate with
other political parties, boring in to destroy
them, as w itness the CIO Political Action
Committee sabotage of Democratic' Party.

Communist propaganda is worldwide.

Communist avenues to political power
lie through Dc-mncrucy and Socialism.

Communistic avenue to economic power
is via stare capitalism.

'Ve jews are a; the bottom of nearly all
your wars " — Rumanian Jew Marcus Hli
Ravage in Century Magazine, Jan.-Feb..
1928. "The war now proposed is for the
purpose of establishing Jewish hegemony
throughout the world."—Gen. George van
Horn Moseley, USA retired, N. Y. Herald-
Tnbunc, Mur. 29. 1959. "Zionists helped
to bring America into the war (World War
No. i)"—London Jewish Chronicle, Fob.

U 1956. "The 2nd' World War is being
fmiuht iit defence of the fundamental of
Judaism."—Chicago Jewish Sentinel, Oct.

8. 1942.

Jewry is the greatest regimented "soli¬
darity' 'in the world.

Jews are notorious pacifists, in theory,

"Assimilation is impossible." — From
"Israel" by Jewish Author Ludwig Lewi-
sohn. "We Jews are a distinct nationality."
—From "Jewish Problem" by Jewish Jus¬
tice Louis D. Brandeis. Samuel L Rosen-
man, "Roosevelt's Right Arm," was quoted
in N. Y. Times Feb. 1, 193-6, as "sharply
attacking assimilation of Jews" into the
nations wherein they live.

Jewish internationalism propaganda is
worldwide. "The propaganda of Commu¬
nism throughout the world, in organization
and direction, is in the hands of Jewish
agents.” — From "The Jews" (1924) by
Hiliare Belloc.

Jewish "avenues to political power" are
through promotion of democracy. Socialism
and Communism. "There is only one way
by which the American people can escape
Communism and Fascism and that is by
establishing A THOROUGHLY SOCIAL¬
IZED DEMOCRACY."—Central Confer¬
ence of American Rabbis, N. Y. Times, Sep.
13, 19?6. "If the Jew wishes to survive he
must identify himself with Communism,"
— Jewish Author Michael Alper in Rabbi
Wise’s magazine "Opinion" of November,
1934. "The undeniable problem of the Jew
can only be solved in a Socialist society."
Jewish Author Broady in the communistic
"New Masses," May 12, 1936. "It is they
(Jews) who are the creators of Democracy,
Socialism and Communism."—Jewish Poet
Bailik in "Lines of Communication" of
Palestine, July, 1933.

"Jew's made an art of lending money;
they fathomed all the secrets that lay hid in
money; they became Lords of Money and
Lords of the World.”—From Jews & Mod¬
ern Capitalism by Werner Sombart. "By-
bolding gold they (Jews) became masters
of their masters."—From "Anti-Semitism"
by Jewish Author Bernard Lazare. "The
sole aim of these international (Jewish)
financiers is world control through the cre¬
ation of inextinguishable debt." — British
Economist Arthur Kitson, in "National Re¬
view" of London, March, 1925. "The Jew

2 3 S

evolved urbanized capitalism v. 1 c1 1 iin¬
strumentality the 'banking system."—Ameri¬
can Hebrew, Sep. 10, 1920. "Anti-Jewish
discrimination in the countries surveyed
centered ENTIRELY ON THE ECON¬
OMIC LIFE OF THE JEWS. - —A Report
by Dr. Lvovich. Officer of the International
ORT, N. Y. Times, June 26, 1938.

Communism rules by fear and terrorism. For the first time in U. S. history citizens

feared their national New Deal administra¬
tion, commonly called "The Jew Deal."

Communist attack-strategy is smear-as¬
sociation and "proof" by inference and im¬
putation, concealing subversive activities of
itself by accusing the opposition of trying
to accomplish what it itself is actually
DOING.

Communism is Bolshevism — Russia is
Communist.

Communist revolutionaries captured Hun¬
gary, Rumania, Czecho-Stovakia and almost
won in Spain.

Communism backs the New Deal in U.S.
"The Communist movement in the U.S. is
an alien conspiracy."—Dec. 29, 193d. re¬
port to Congress by American Coalition of
Patriotic Societies.

The policy of Jewish-owned and Jewish
advertising-controlled publications follow
the same "line."

"The Ideals of Bolshevism are at many
points consonant with the finest ideals of
Judaism."—London Jewish Chronicle, Apr.
4, 1919. "It was a Jew. Leon Trotsky, who
led the Red Army which saved the Com¬
munist Cause in Russia." — From "How
Odd Of God" by Rabbi Lewis Browne. In
his 1918 book "Jews In Russia." Victor
Marsden, London Correspondent in Russia,
said of 545 Bolshevist officials 477 were
Jews. "Bolshevisirh is organized and con¬
trolled by Jews."—Netherlands Minister to
Russia, Sept. 6, 19LS, reproduced in British
Govt. White Paper on Russia in 1919.
"What Jewish Idealism so powerfully con¬
tributed to accomplish in Russia, the same
historic qualities of the Jewish mind are
tending to promote in OTHER COUN¬
TRIES."—American Hebrew, Sep. 10, 1920,

Communist revolutionaries were led in
Hungary and Spain by the Jew Bela Kuhn;
and by the Jew Socialist Leon Blum in
France, in Rumania by Jewish Anna Pauker.

"The underlying philosophy of the New
Deal is the philosophy of Justice Brandeis
of the U. S. Supreme Court."—N.Y. Times,
Tune 26, 1934. "More than any one person
Felix Frankfurter is the Legal Mastermind
of the New Deal."—From "The New Deal¬
ers" by Simon & Schuster. "The due process
clauses ought to go" out of the Constitu¬
tion—From 1938-9 book "Law & Politics
of Felix Frankfurter, now Justice of Su¬
preme Court. Those clauses constitute the
cornerstone of American liberty. "The
Roosevelt Administration has selected more
Jews to fill influential positions than any
previous administration in American his¬
tory."—Brooklyn Jewish Examiner, Oct. 20,
1933, referring to Bernard M. Baruch as
"Unofficial President." The World Al¬
manac 1934-44 refers to Franklin D. Roose¬
velt as a descendant of the Roosevelt-Sam-
uels family of Holland. "The man behind
the re-packing of the U, S. Supreme Court
was' Samuel I. Rosenman, close friend of
the President."—National Columnist Paul
MaJlon. Feb. 7, 1937, "The Social Justice

2 39

The CIO Politic.il Action Committee,
.successor of the dissolved Communist Party
in the LL S., is Communist led. according
to the Mar.' 29, 1944, report of the Con¬
gressional Committee.

The "Daily Worker' is the official organ
of the Communist Party in the U. 5. The
N. Y. Morning Freiheic is the largest Com¬
munist daily in theU. S.

Communism is anti-Christ, being athe¬
istic.

Committee nf the Rabbinical Assembly en¬
dorses the President’s plan fur reorganiza¬
tion of the Supreme Court, and favors the
general tendency nf recently adopted social¬
ist legislation, in particular the scope of die
Tennessee Valley Authority.'N. Y. Jew.
ish Day, May II, 1937,

Four hundred of the names of CIO
Political Action Committee key-men are
Jewish. Sidney Hillman. Russian-born few,
was chairman.

The incorporators of the "Daily Worker”
were all Jews, and the editor of the Frei-
heit A a Jew.

lewry is anti-Christ. 'Fundamentally,
Judiasm is anti-Christian.”—London Jewish
World, Mar. 15, 1923- "By the very fact of
denying the divinity of Christ. Jews place
themselves as enemies of the social order
since this order is based on Christianity."
—From "Anti-Semitism" by Jewish Author
Bernard Laz 2 re. "We challenge the present
social system."—Resolution of the Central
Conference of American Rabbis, N. Y.
Times. Sep. 13. 1936. The United Stares
was Christian-established. Sc-e Constitution
attestation and U. S. Supreme Court de¬
cisions.

2 4 0

"ANTI-SEMITISM” ANALYZED

Based on foreknowledge that he has been substantially qualified to answer
by a twenty-year intensive study of 'Anti-Semitism, its origins and propaganda,
this writer has been requested to publicize in questionnaire form his findings on
the subject. This has been done in an analysis below for congressmen:

What is "Anti-Semitism”?

A publicity "smear'-word.

Does ''anti” imply antagonism to the Arab, Syrian, Egyptian members of
the Semite "race”?

No, only to Jews.

Then the term is misleading?

It is, intentionally so.

Could it be called deceitful?

It is just that.

What is the object?

To conceal Jewish activities unfavorable to non-Jews.

Is it employed only by Jews?

Yes!

Did ancient Palestine Jews use the appellation?

No more than do present-day Arabs, who are of the Semite race. How can
a Semite logically be called "anti-Semitic?”

Then "Anci-Semitic" was not a Christian Bible term?

I found no record of such a thing. Non-Jews were often referred to as
"Gentiles,” or non-believers in Jewish faith.

Do present-day Jews refer to their critics by terms other than "Anti-
Semitic?”

Yes, "members of the Lunatic Fringe,” "Nazis,” "Fascists,” "Red Baiters.”

But the labels you refer to are Communistic.

They are, many Jews are confessed members of the "Communist
Internationale.”

Isn’t International Communism anti-nationalist?

Yes, so are "International Jews” of today. They refuse to assimilate into the
nations wherein they live.

Then "Anti-Semitic” may properly be termed "Patriotic”?

National Patriotism is automatically "Anti-Semitic” as the latter word is
today used.

Then why do some Gentile commentators refer to ' the virus of Anti-
Semitism?”

Because they are misled.

Where did present-day Communism originate?

In Russia among Jews.

Did Jews have anything to do with the Bolshevist Revolution that
established the Communist Soviets?

The Revolutionary Committee which directed the uprising that overthrew
the Czar Autocracy was composed of 545, of which 447 were Jews.

2 4 1

Where did "Anti Semitism” first appear politically?

When Czarist Russia made effective 1882 May Laws ghettoing Jews because
they would not assimilate.

Why does "International Jewry" now call Communist Russia "Anti-
Semitic" ?

Apparently because so-called "Zionist Jews" of the Bolshevist Revolution
refused to assimilate.

Then the Communist High Command is "purging" the "Zionist jews"
because they refused to be assimilated into the Communist State— thereby-
constituting a danger to safety?

Apparently so.

Where did Zionism originate?

Among the Eastern Russia Jews.

Are there many Zionist Jews?

The American Jewish Congress history book "Unity In Dispersion" indi¬
cates that present day "western" World Jewry is a 9 *> r /c majority. A minority
of about one million "Sephardim" is located mostly in Moslem countries.
Eastern Europe Jews have called themselves Ashkenazim without giving the'
name's genesis. They speak Yiddish, not Hebrew. They are contemptuous of
Sephardim Jews. Zionist Past President Julian Mack says 9S% of American Jews
are Zionists.

What does "Ashkenazim" indicate?

It describes descendants of an East European kingdom called "Khazars,”
who were mass-converted to Judaism about 750 A.D., by Dispersed emigrants
from Palestine.

Then Zionists do not belong to the Semite races of the Middle East?

Both Jewish and Christian authorities say they belong to the Asiatic Mon¬
golian race which settled in the Caucasus, home of the Khazars.

Then Zionists apparently have no legitimate racial claim to a "home in
Palestine" where they recently established the political state of "Israel"?

It is so held by H. G. Wells in his "Outline Of History.”

When did Communism appear on the European political field?

In the early part of the Nineteenth Century, It apparently stemmed from
"The Illuminatti," a band of ruthless men who organized in 1798 with the
declared intent of destroying all governmentas and religions.

Have Khazar Jews displayed any special antagonism to the Christian
Religion?

Some Christian quarters hold that Christianity is today being crucified on a
cross of gold—repeating history that records the crucifixion of Individualism on
the "Cross of Calvary” twenty centuries ago.

Doesn't all this evidence point straight to a world conspiracy against all
nations?

Cold logic answers affirmatively,

Why is that fact suppressed?

Because the "terrible power of the purse" destroys free speech and free
press, and promotes treason among politicians trapped in a gigantic web of
deceit.

Out of more than twenty-five different "explanations" published regarding
the "anti-Semitic" Russian "purge puzzle," many of them from Jewish sources
as well as otherwise, not one has been lucid as to the implications of the
momentous developments of 1953.

2 4 2

"KEY” SUCCESSORS TO STALIN

MALENKOV, George; Premier; ancestry Asiatic; born in Eastern Russia;
"right-hand man'.’ of Kaganowitch in past Stalin purges. Acted as "political"
commissar in Red Army.

BERIA, Lavrenti; former name Berijev; Interior Minister with control of
Soviet Secret Police; ancestry Jew 1 ; protege of Kaganowitch; in Beria lies the
most important part of the Soviet machine according to Eugene Lyons, Jewish
author who had a two-hour interview' with Stalin in the Thirties. In the San
Francisco Examiner Lyons said the same old gang still controls the Kremlin.
(3-13-53) ("Liquidated" later.)

KAGANOWITCH, Lazarus; Vice-Premier; ancestry Jew; relatives key-
posted throughout Soviet; sister was Stalin’s wife; Stalin's daughter recently
married a Kaganowitch; Kaganowitch is the ablest man in the Politburo accord¬
ing to "Life" magazine 7-14-41. "Lazarus Kaganowitch is a great man. He will
one day rule over the country of the Czars. His sister is Stalin's wife." From
"The Moment," Russian Jew' publication 11-13-34.

MOLOTOV, V. M., Foreign Minister; name changed from Scryabin; wife
Jewess; born Eastern Russia, son of salesman; the name "Molotov" means
"hammer" like pseudonym "Marcus Eli Ravage," author of "Real Case Against
The Jew's." Molotov's "assistant" is the Jew Jacob Malik.

VISHINSKY, Andrei; UN Soviet Delegate; "Jewish."

All of above were from the Eastern European Khazar-Jew territory.

IS MALENKOF "jew-surrounded?"

In January, 1953, Rabbi Abba Hillel Silver told a Philadelphia Jewish
audience to suspend judgment as to-whether or not Russian Jew-purges w’ere
genuine "anti-Semitic" orders from the Kremlin. Did he have foreknowledge?

The conclusion is inescapable. The Kremlin Jew-domination is NOT
genuinely "Anti-Semitic." Which condition recalls the Communist protocol to
the effect that when safety calls for such action progroms against Jews are
instigated by the High Command "for the management of our lesser brethren”
"Anti-Semitism" is diversive strategy to mask ulterior subversions.

"Gothic Ripples," of March 12, 1953, Editor Arnold Leese, Guildford, Surrey, England,
contains the important information that the new edition of the Soviet Encyclopedia proves
that "there is no 'anti-Semitism' in official Russia. Volume 15—per London Jewish Chronicle
of Feb. 13, 1953—reports what the Soviets have always maintained—that 'The Jewish
Problem does not exist in the Soviet Union, where today Jews find the doors open to ail
professions.' Whether of the Right or Left, those who speak of recent events behind the
Iron Curtain as evidence of 'anti-Semitism 1 in the Soviets are either utterly misled by imperfect
knowledge or are deliberately using the crisis to gain sympathy for the Jews. By 'imperfect
knowledge' we mean ignorance of the basic fact that Bolshevism (Communism) is Jewish.
What is happening in Russia may have a tremendous repercussion on world politics, for at last
Bolshevik Jew fights Bolshevik Jew. This gives scope for o split Russia. If that happens the
end of the cold war would be in sight."

A Tel Aviv cable to the San Francisco Examiner of Feb. 13, 1953, reported
unofficial Jewish sources "expressed satisfaction that the incident (bombing)
would definitely place Israel in the camp of western nations and MAKE HER
DESERVING OF MORE U. S. ECONOMIC HELP AND ARMS TO
STRENGTHEN HER POSITION AGAINST HOSTILE ARABS."

243

Jewish Congressman Emanuel Celler of Brooklyn said on Feb. 15, 1953,
in the N. Y. Times that the Israel bombing incident opened opportunity for
America to increase its financial and military aid ' to the Jewish State.

TREASON TO THE U. S.

The pattern of the "purge” strategy of the Jewish High Command was
inadvertently exposed in a N.Y. hem published Jan. 2-4, 19Y3, in the San
Francisco Examiner, which said: The American Jewish Committee charged
today that Russia's vast anti-Semitic purge has driven into slave labor camps
800,000 Jews.”

The further statement was made that an American Jewish Committees
"survey.” based on "contacts with underground sources, monitoring of Com¬
munist broadcasts, interviews with refugees, and State Department reports’ of
1952, shows that the goal of the purges is the same as Hitler's, viz.:

(1) To Mobilize anti-American hatred all over the world.

(2) To cause “Anti-Semitic groups to isolate the U. S.” from Allies
during a Stalin "hot” war against the free world.

(3) It gives the information that purges of Jew's would be led by Jews
in many cases so that the Communists can say there is no discrimination.

The implied intent of the involved Jewish policy forecasts a sinister assault
on U, S. publishers exposing the Jewish anti-Americanism of the New Deal, as
indicated by the hint that "anti-Semitic groups" would be a Russian Fifth
Column in the U. S. to isolate and weaken the latter and promote the success
of a Soviet "shooting war.”

The focus is that said "anti-Semitic" publishers would be guilty of treason
to the U. S. in that they, by being "anti-Semitic,” help the Communists.

Such invalidated "guilt by mere association" was precisely the completely-
refuted accusation of the Communistic Roosevelt prosecution in the 1944 dis¬
missed mass-case, in which defendants were branded as co-conspirators with
Hitler because they also were "anti-Semitic," like the Nazis.

Former Zionist Organization President Solomon Goldman said in the N. Y.
Times of July 1, 1940: "He who is an anti-Semite is a Hitlerite.” So you there
have the Jewish inspiration of the foregoing direct from "the horse s mouth."

Doesn't blundering false Jewish Leadership EVER learn? As shown in the
two Edmondson cases cited in this Petition, Jews are evidently again "allowing
their emotion" to guide them to defeat, a reluctant published confession from
Jewish Chief Counsel Hays of the American Civil Liberties Union, following-the
enforced backdowns in said cases.

The typical alibi prediction in the final sentence of the above Exam¬
iner dispatch that "MANY Jews" will lead the "Jew purges,” carries the im¬
plication that many Jews are Communists, which has hitherto been denied by
the "conservative" American Jewish Committee, although “radical" American
Jewish Congress members have admitted it in writing.

The “survey" sources of information listed by the American Jewish Com¬
mittee are obviously pro-Jewish, and as Jews will analyze and interpret such
prejudiced data and propagandize it through advertising-controlled publications
in the U. S., che general public can not recognize and isolate the bias.

2 4 4

National chauvinism is an extreme form of racial chauvinism. Hence
Anti-Semitism is dangerous to the toiler. Therefore Communists, as internation¬
alists, cannot but be irreconcilable sworn enemies of anti-Semitism, which is
severely suppressed in the USSR as profoundly inimical to the Soviet Union
Anti-Semites arc- punished accordingpo the laws of the USSR by death.”

The foregoing is a Stalin interview published Nov. 26 , 1937, by The N Y
Morning Freiheit, largest Communist daily in the U. S.,’printed'in Yiddish
purporting to be FUNDAMENTAL Soviet doctrine.

It sec-ms that the following question answers itself: Would the.Rosen-
bergs convicted of treason to the U, S, for sending our atom secrets to the Krem¬
lin Communist Leadership have taken such action if Communism were actually
anti-Semitic’ and against all Jews? It is noteworthy that at the time of the Rosen¬
berg clemency plea to the White House, the latter’was picketed by Daily Worker
Communist delegations.

Clemency was officially denied the Rosenbergs when, on Feb. 11 , 1953 in
a powerful elementary-justice patriotic-condemnation. President Eisenhower’re¬
fused to intervene. By which positive concrete action he definitely put Ameri¬
can interests before Jewish demands. A politically-minded President would have
granted clemency.

Will U. S. Communistic Zionist sources now call the President "Anti-
Semitic because his action coincides with the Communist reported "anti-
Semitic purge of Jews who confessed treason guilt to the Russian Government;
and that therefore Mr. Eisenhower is a Communist following the anti-American
Soviet Line ; that, moreover, because of such "enemy collaboration," he is a
traitor to the Republic of the U, $.; and that, furthermore, he should undergo an
alienist test to see whether or not he belongs to "The Lunatic Fringe?”

I Sincerely hope that President Eisenhower may find time to read and
digest this Petition (copy of which has been sent to him) because the docu¬
mentary-record should prevent him from becoming tangled in the most gigantic-
labyrinth spider-web of deceit ever evolved.

A CRAZY RECORD

Rabbi Schmelka Margoshes, Editor of the N. Y. Jewish Day wrote Sep
12, 1936. "We are a people nobody knows!" r

Basil M. Henriques, a distinguished British Jew, admitted: "We are a
peculiar people, and a peculiar people we shall remain!"—Zionist Record of
South Africa, Apr. 29 , 1939 .

Opposing assimilation. Rabbi S. S. Wise of N, Y., Theodor Herzl Austrian
Founder of Zionism, and Chief Rabbi Herzl of England, declared "we are a
people.”

In.die Jewish Encyclopedia Vol. IX, under "Nervous Diseases” this ap¬
pears; 'Physicians of large experience among Jews have stated that most of
them are neurasthenic and hysterical.”

As to dementia, it has been established in public and private clinics that
the percentage of Jews is three times greater than Christians."—From "Tews
and Judaism of Today” (1925), as published by "The Key To The Mystery."

T Alexander Pilcz, world famous psychiatrist of Vienna, in "Wiener

Klinsche Rundschau” (1910) Page 888 , made this statement: "Cases where
acute psychoses lead to idiocy and lunacy are of particular frequency with the
Jews. (From the Key to The Mystery). '

245

When attacking "anti-Semites’' Jewish writers concentrate on the bromidic
smears "Lunatic Fringe/' "Crackpot/' "Filthy Jew-Baiters,” "Nazi-Fascist,"
calling for insanity tests.

When this writer was summoned ro appear before N. Y. Jewish Mayor
LaGuardia in the Jewish Religion group libel case, he was told that an alienist
would be on hand to "give him the paranoic works."

The same smear w'as proposed by jew'i.sh publications for "anti-Semitic ’
defendants in the notorious mass-conspiracy case later in Washington.

(Incidentally, Robert Edward Edmondson is ready at any time to submit
to a genuine sanity test by any reputable non-Jew alienist—after he has read
this document.)

Now, in the Communist purge-rrial of several years ago in Moscow, a large
number of Jew's vociferously confessed gross treason guilt to the Soviet.

Precisely the same thing occurred in Prague at the 1952 trial of Jewish
Communists, where children w-ere reported in the press as gleefully accusing
their parents of treason.

A Jewish psychiatrist on January 16 , 1953, delivered a lecture on "Mass
Paranoia" before a California Medical Society, according to reproduction by
the Peninsula Herald of Monterey, Calif., the next day, from which the follow¬
ing extract is taken:

"The major symptoms are a pre-occupation with suspicion, delusions of
persecution, conspiratorial feelings; irrational accusations. In the mass, this
becomes a persecution of minorities.”

. . Our race has given the world a new prophet. He has two faces and
bears two names. On the one side his name is Rothschild (Red Flag), leader of
capitalists; on the other Karl Marx (Communist).—Jewish Editor Blumental
in "Judisk Tidskrift," Sweden, 1929, Issue No. 57.

"No other religion in the world has offered a spectacle as contradictory,
as malicious as the Jewish prayer Kol Nidre used during Yom Kippur . . .
Jewish history has been tragic to the Jews and no less tragic to the nations which
have suffered them. Our major vice of old and of today is parasitism."—
From "Jews Must Live," by Jewish Author Samuel Roth.

WORLDWIDE DESTROYERS

Jewish Author Samuel in "You Gentiles" says "Jews are destroyers, even
of those instruments of destruction to which they turn for relief.”

That sounds "cockeyed," but "let’s look at the record.”

JEWS "TURNED” TO RUSSIA and established Bolshevist Communism.
Refusing to assimilate, do they now seek "to destroy" with an "Anti-Semitic”
boomerang because they failed to get "relief?”

Explaining "Anti-Semitic” purging was due to "Russian Jew-s’ refusal to
become completely absorbed into the Communist State," Chancellor Simon
Greenberg of the Jewish Theological Seminary of New York (quoted in the
San Francisco Examiner of Feb. 19, 1952) added that the Soviets hoid Inter¬
national Judaism to be treason. As safety of The Republic requires assimilation
into a single American organism, should the U. S. also regard such anti-assimi¬
lation attitude as treason? Maybe the answer is in the American electoral re¬
pudiation of the "Jew” Deal last November.

246

And as Dr. Greenberg claims that the "seeds of Anti-Semitism" were in the
19.17 Bolshevist Revolution, would it be impertinent to ask whether or not the
intent thereby indicated unmasked a pre-conceived plot to dominate Russia?

A Palestine special to the N. Y. Tunes of Feb. 14, 1933, quotes Israel’s
Foreign Minister Sharett as saying the Soviet rupture of diplomatic relations
was an attempt to destroy the sense of unity" among Jews longing for Zion.
He admitted that the allegiance which Jews of the world have for the State of
Israel "cuts right across Soviet conceptions."

JEWS "TURNED TO" GERMANY "for relief." Later, these "Khazar
converts to Judaism," refusing to assimilate, and frustrated from complete
domination, betrayed that country to destruction by bringing a World War on
Germany, for becoming militantly "anti-Semitic?"

JEWS "TURNED TO" THE AMERICAN REPUBLIC "for relief" as
refugees; but, refusing assimilation, they moved to destroy its form of govern¬
ment with their socialistic New Deal.

"WELCOMED IN, BOOTED OUT"

In the August, 1941, Atlantic Monthly, James Marshall, N. Y. prominent
Jewish lawyer, admitted: "In every century the jew has been welcomed into and
booted out of some land. ... It would be idle to deny chat Anti-Semitism exists
in America, or that it is loose dynamite."

Judging by its many failures Jewish leadership never learns, and obviously
repudiates the ancient wisdom that to know the future man must be largely
guided by past error.

Doesn't the Jewish anti-assimilationist policy constitute—

(1) Alien enemy invasion, with hostile intent toward existing forms of
national organisms, whose safety, peace and welfare depend on complete absorp¬
tion of and disappearance into their culture of all ideologies?

(2) Also indicate acquisition of American citizenship in such a manner as
to supply de facto prima facie evidence of false pretenses amply adequate to
justify prompt de-naturalization, disfranchisement and deportation of those who
refuse to sink their peculiar antagonistic identities into genuine undivided
allegiance to Americanism?

Existing laws arc daily being invoked to de-naturalize citizens who ob¬
tained citizenship by making false statements in their application oaths.

That the inherent anti-assimilation policy of Jewry is a specific danger to
the peace and safety of The Republc, is not susceptible to challenge.

To find the truth amid all this profound chaos the trained observer well-
informed as to the Jewish Problem has little difficulty to trace the trail of the
Jewish dream of supreme power, starting with analysis of the conception and
perspective opened by the elucidations given below by highest authorities.

Once that commanding-view position is fortified by comprehensive know¬
ledge of the past, the "Jewish Line," at times hidden with bi-laterals and di-
versive movements, planned or accidental, the analyst is never confused more
than temporarily, by incidental screens such as racial "Anti-Semitism,” Zionist
Communism, Socialism, Marxism, phoney Liberalism, Internationalist, Paternal
and other subversive auxiliaries, which are TOOLS dictated by the end-product
aim of complete dominion.

247

WORLD DOMINION DREAM GENESIS

To get real light on the Russian purges it is vital to consult origins, and
in "Secret Societies’’ bp Nesta H. Webster, famous British author, is found
the following quotation:

"The conception of jews as Chosen People who must eventually rule the
woiid, forms the basis of Rabbinical Judaism and the Jewish Religion now-
takes its stand on the TALMUD AND NOT THE BIBLE.

Mrs. Webster adds that it is in the Jewish Cabala . . . that the dream of
world dominion recurs with great persistence; the Zohar explaining that The
Feast of the Tabernacles' is the period when they triumph over other peoples of
the world. The hope of world dominion is not an idea attributed to Jews by
'anti-Semices but a very real and essential part of their traditions. Let us not
forget that Rabbinical Judaism is the declared implacable enemy of Christianity
. Jews find in promoters of class-warfare their most valuable allies.

An eminent Biblical theologian, Rev. Denis Fahey, in his Mystical Body of
Christ," says the Talmud exposes the "terrible Jewish pride” in the corruption
of "the Chosen People Mission’’ down into materialism, adding that from their
condemnation by Jesus, Palestine 'Jews ceased to be the Chosen People. As
Jewish power in the material order grows ,they fail prey to Marxian Pantheism.

Going into the diplomatic field the reader will find world power con¬
firming evidence also In the secular realm as plainly indicated by Netherlands
Minister Oudenryk’s code message from Russia to his government in Holland
recommending immediate transmission to the British Government as an Empire
with power to counter the threat. Oudendyk telegraphed from St. Petersburg
in 1918 that, "Bolshevism is organized by Jews whose object is to destroy for
their own ends the existing order of things —which is in harmony with the
'"Tiluminatti” program to destroy all national governments” with the Fifth
Column" of anti-assimilation.

Referring to the long-established anti-assimilation policy of International
Jewry, Editor Morrison of the powerful Protestant publication The Christian
Century, in its issues of April 29 and May 13, 1936, editorially makes this
charge:

"A Judaism which talks of its uniqueness and is unwilling to take 'pot
luck’ with humanity by offering its treasures to the rest of mankind, cannot
escape the SUSPICION that it is hoarding its treasures for a SELFISH
PURPOSE."

That immediately poses these significant questions:

Could said "suspicion" interpret that "selfish purpose" as "The Jewish
COMMON PURPOSE" so often broadcast by B’nai B’rith publications—
carrying the implication that "the common" objective of Jewry comprises the
world dominion plot-pattern faithfully followed by the Jewish-Bolshevist over¬
powering of Russia, and in subsequent Communist subversions of national
unities?

Will such "suspicion" also expose the underlying reason why Jews are
"booted out of every country" where they were unsuspectingly welcomed, and
because, failing to dominate, refusing assimilation, they have brought destruc¬
tion as heretofore categorically indicated, executing it with the double-meaning
diversive cry "Anti-Semitic" persecution, to delude the rest of the world?

From the "vantage point" gained through the reader’s conviction as-to the
chief objective of world dominion, the fog of compounded confusion is pierced
by the X-ray of that foreknowledge.

248

BuL it must first be recognized thar cliversive activities merely represent
"tools" of accomplishment, such as Communism, which Jews themselves do not
want as their "Way of Life;" for their goal is ultimately individual. But, in
order to achieve it they temporarily sink themselves into organized regimentation,
convinced that such organization implacably operated, is the only method
whereby a small minority can finally acquire eventual individual power over
the common enemy.

The widely propagandized paradox that the Jews cannot at the same time
be the greatest capitalist assembly and the most numerous communistic collection
is now being generally unmasked by eventualities. They in unison promote com-
munization of Gentiles from above and below, in pursuit of a Jewish solidarity
idealization of supreme power.

The close inspector of developments will be convinced that Jews are not
omnipotent, and that the dream of universal power is certain to end in universal
ruin should it be realized. But completely exposed, evil generally turns
against itself because the forces it invoked go into destructive reactionary-
reverse.

Personal initiative is the worst enemy of the subverters because it is the
soul of real progress.

A PROFOUND PROPHECY

Britain’s foremost Jewish Socialist H. J. Laski, Chairman of the British
Labor Party, who lectured in America for the Collectivist way of life, according
to Benj. de Casseres in the July 31, 1945, San Francisco Examiner, made the
following prophecy:

"If the ’ experiment (Socialistic New Deal) for which Roosevelt is re¬
sponsible were in any serious degree to break down, the first result of its break¬
down, because of the association with it of a number of eminent American
Jews, would be the outbreak in the United States of Anti-Semitism more pro¬
found than anything Anglo-Saxon civilization has so far known."—(Quoted
from Page 3, of the London "Fascist” of January, 1935, under the heading
"Sovietism By Stealth," with the statement that Prof. Laski had enunciated it at
the "8th Living Newspaper Meeting" held at the Anglo-Palestinian Club on
Dec. 2, 1934.)

These questions pose themselves:

Does the November 4, 1952, overwhelming national election repudiation
of said New Deal constitute said "breakdown” and reveal that "profound anti-
Semitism,” considered in connection with the fact that most of the convicted
defendants in the 1952-3 communist spy trials in American cities were Jews,
contribute to such "anti-Semitism?”

In an anti-lynching bill debate in March, 1937, Congressman Eugene Cox
of Georgia said to Congressman Dickstein of New York: "If you insist upon an
inquiry you are speeding the day when patriots will have to defend Jews against
mass-intolerance, Mark my words! That day is coming.”—American Hebrew,
Mar. 1937.

The New Deal was openly called "The Jew Deal” in various parts of
eastern United States. If the reader entertains doubt as to its Jewish character
he will no longer be skeptical after reading the summarizing below of authentic
documents quoted in this record in extenso,

In the earlv Thirties it was broadcast that Bernard M. Baruch was known as
"Unofficial President" in the absence of New Deal President Roosevelt; that
Jewish U. S. Supreme Court Justice Brandeis was "Father of the New Deal;”
chat U, S. Supreme Court Justice Frankfurter was the "Legal Master-Mind”
who reportedly guided the White House Supreme Courc "packing” plan of the
New Deal; that N. Y. Justice Samuel .I. Rosenman. was "Roosevelt’s Right
Arm” and writer of his state documents: that the Jew Herbert Feis was "The
Brains of the State Department;” that the Jew Lilienthal headed the "typically”
Socialistic Tennesse Valley Authority; that James P. Warburg, son of the “Father
of the Federal Reserve System” was a New Deal "braintrusterthat the Central
Conference of American Rabbis called on Washington for "socialization of
basic American enterprises;" that Prof. H. J. Laski and Israel Moses Sief were
Roosevelt British Jew consultants; and fast, but not least, that President Franklin
D. Roosevelt himself admitted Jewish ancestry, which was moreover promul¬
gated by a genealogy from the Washington Carnegie Institute. And that when
FDR introduced Bernard M. Baruch to a White House visitor, saying that
"Bernie” had monitored him for many years, Baruch added "And don't you
think I made a good job of it?”

In the light of the foregoing and the up-to-date quotation below from
London "Truth” of January 23, 195 3, minds not dosed will be completely
convinced.

"TRUTH ” TURNS ON SEARCHLIGHT

Referring to the "especially incongruous” Churchiil-Eisenhower meetings
in N. Y. City at the private residence of Bernard M, Baruch after the Presi¬
dential election, the London Weekly’s writer, Douglas Reed, said;

"From such statements as he (Baruch) occasionally makes, he appears to be
in global affairs AN INTERNATIONALIST, in domestic ones, A SOCIALIST.

"He has consistently recommended the REDUCTION OF NATIONAL
SOVEREIGNTY in the greater field, and the IMPOSING OF CONTROLS
in the American domestic one.

"Thus he appears to be NOT A BELIEVER IN NATIONAL OR IN¬
DIVIDUAL LIBERTY, which is the root-principle of Conservative belief, but
an OPPONENT thereof.

"He has sometimes gone very far in recommending a SUPRA-NATIONAL
AUTHORITY answerable to none, but EQUIPPED WITH A TERRIBLE
SWIFT SWORD."

Although emanating from quarters possibly not completely informed, that
summary, in my opinion, is the most penetrative scholarly and dramatic evalua¬
tion of "the Elder Statesman" ever published at home or abroad.

After careful review of the record herein regarding this Wall Street self-
styled speculator, termed "Mystery Man” in politico-economic circles of the
world capitals of Washington, New York and London, newsmen like the under¬
signed, with decades of experience in the world’s greatest financial center of
New York, have been overwhelmed bv the dramatic spectacle presented of
"one-man-power” of practically unbounded extent and degree—recalling
Baruch’s admission before a U.S. Congressional Committee following World
War One, that during the great conflict he had more power than any man.

2 5 0

Which probably operated to acquire for him in newspaper publicity the bom-
basic titles of "Elder Statesman" and "Presidential Advisor," since he went to
Paris with President Woodrow Wilson where the Versailles Treaty was ef¬
fected and which is said to have been a root-cause of World War Two..

Evidently the "global" deductions referred to in "Truth," were dictated by
B&ruch’s continuously strong support of "UN," with whose creation Jewry had
much to do; their spokesmen having boasted in the past that they had "created"
the previously dissolved League of Nations.

The "great persuasive power" of the Barnchian "suave personality’’ backed
by huge wealth of baronial extent, created for him an enormous politico-econ¬
omic influence, in recognition of which his name heads the "Honor Roll" of
"Who's Who in American Jewry." (See Postscript on Page 284).

The "Truth" allusion to Baruch’s INTERNATIONALISM, interpreting it
as "anti-national," recalls a statement published in the Chicago Tribune in the
Twenties, wherein he was credited with calling "National Pride (Patriotism)
a lot of nonsense."

The late Pennsylvania Congressman Louis T. McFadden, Chairman of
the House Banking Committee, told the House that "every administration which
had. listened to Baruch's advice had sunk the nation "deeper and deeper into
financial mire."

As to Baruch’s origins, I have seen published statement by him saying
that his father was a Polish Jew—which puts him in the Khazar "Eastern Russia
Jew” category.

I would like to entertain the hope, in concluding this analysis, that the
masterly "Truth" summation supplies reasons why Baruch has not—yet—been
"appointed" as "Elder Statesman" of the "Eisenhower Administration."

ANTI-SEMITISM IN U. S. BEFORE HITLER

The 1944 mass-case prosecution alleged that Edmondson "anti-Semitic"
publicity was "Nazi propaganda; that there was no active or organized 'anti-
Semitism' in the U. S. before Hitler came to power in 1953, so that American
'anti-Semitism' was therefore Nazi-inspired and projected."

Defendant Edmondson prepared in refutation a court exhibit containing the
following:

Benjamin Franklin was against the Jews as shown in "Benjamin Franklin’s
Writings” by Smythe, in the N. Y. Public Library, wherein the following was
written by Franklin to President Adams of the United States from France on
Dec. 14, 1781:

"By this time I fancy your Excellency is satisfied in supposing that J.
Neufvilie is as much a Jew as any in Terusalem—since Jacob was not content
with his percents but took the whole of his brother’s (Esau’s) birthright—and
his posterity did the same by the Canaanites and cut their throats into the bar¬
gain. Which I do not think Neufvilie has the least inclination to do to us when
he can get anything by our being alive."

That "anti-semitism” was 152 years before Hitler became Chancellor of
Germany in 1933.

We now come to an Adams sequel, for the extracts below are from "Henry
Adams and his Friends," 1947, by Harold Dean Cater, Houghton Mifflin Co.,
publishers, Boston, Mass. (Henry Adams is a descendant of John Adams).

2 5 I

A letter to John Hay from London, Oct. 4, 1895, from Henry Adams says:
"The Jew Question is really the most serious of our problems. The Christians
secretly encourage the anti-Semicic movement.’ 1

Letter from same to same dated July 28. 1896: "Did you enjoy, as I did,
that list of Jew names tailed after J. P. Morgan in the foreign exchange syndicate
which has been formed to step in and try to save Morgan’s stocks from going
to nothing? How the deuce do the Jews manage to make this chaos stand on
end. The whole carcass is rotten with worms—socialist ■worms, anarchist
w'orms, Jew worms."

That was more than 35 years pre-Hitler.

"Organized Anti-Semitism in the U. S.," by Donald Strong, published in
1941 under the sponsorship of the "American Council on Public Affairs,”
after saying on Page 14 "The Jew is the perpetual alien,” reports on Page 15
"Anti-Semitism in its political form first appeared in the U. S. at the end of
the world war (1918). The high point was reached in 1920-22 (11 years pre-
Hitler.) Political anti-Semitism had been well-rooted in German culture for
HALF A CENTURY when the Nazis appeared on the scene/

On Dec. 17, 1862, more than 70 years pre-Hitler, U. S. General Grant
issued an order barring Jewish traders from Union Army camps, because they
"violated every regulation of trade established by the Treasury Dept.” Could
that have been "active anti-Semitism?”

The Henry Ford anti-Jewish literature in 1920-22 was so strongly docu¬
mented, it created widespread active "anti-Semitism” throughout the United
Slates long before the Nazis rose to power. (Recent developments include a
confession that Ford’s secretary—not Henry Ford—wrote the "apology” Jews
claim to have forced from Ford.)

The case of Near vs. Minnesota, 283 U. S. Supreme Court 697 shows that
’’virulent Anti-Semitism” existed in the U. S. in 1927, six years before the
Nazis came to power. The owner of "The Saturday Press” of Minneapolis, in his
Nov. 19, 1927, issue, charged city officials with corruption, and said: "Practical¬
ly every vendor of vile hooch, every owner of a moonshine still, every snake¬
faced gangster and embryonic yegg in the Twin Cities is a Jew.”

"Concerning The Jews,” article by Mark Twain in the 1900 edition of
"The Man That Corrupted Hadleyburg,” reflects strong "Anti-Semitism” in
the U. S. 33 years before Hitler came to power. Twain said: "The Jew is a
money-getter;” he made it the end and aim of his life; he was at it in Rome;
he has been at it ever since; his success has made the whole human race his
enemy.”—(33 years before Hitler.)

Rabbi Lee J. Levinger’s 1930-1 book "The History of the Jews in the
U. S.” says:

"After the world war (1914-18) all this anti-Semitism was brought to
America. . . . Jews had been excluded from social clubs and fashionable resorts;
Jewish businessmen were boycotted.”

The book admits a "flood of Jews” came from Eastern Europe and
Russia just after 1918—more than a decade before Hitler came to power in
1933.

Did this "flood” cause "anti-Semitism?” Let Zionist Founder Theodor
Herzl answer from his 1936 book "The Jewish State,” wherein he said "The
Jewish Question exists wherever Jews live in perceptible numbers.”

2 5 2

Many Jews lived in the U. S. in 1925, S years before Hitler became German
Chancellor, viz: 3,500,000 of them.

On Oct. 17, 1944, principal Prosecution Witness Rauschning in answering
cross-examinations by mass-case defense counsel, admitted as follows at the
mis-trial in Washington, D. C.:

"Is a person who is sincerely anti-Semitic a Nazi?”

"No. Anti-Semitism existed hundreds of years before Hitler.”

"Without being a Nazi, do you stand with Americans who are against
Communism?”

"Yes. A strong national spirit does not make an American patriot a
Nazi,”

(End of Court Exhibit.)

"ANTI-SEMITIC” ROOTS

'The Russian May, 1882 laws w-ere the most conspicuous monument
achieved by modern Anti-Semitism, which then set its mark on the international
relationships of the powers. The modern Jew with his Yiddish culture and
rapacious traditions should not be confused with Bibical Jews, who were mainly
a pastoral people. The International Jew of modern times is the bastardized pro¬
duct of a bastardized past. He does not worship the Bible, but the Talmud; he
does not speak Hebrew, but Yiddish, He is not descended from Israel. This is
vividly Illustrated by H. G. Wells in his 'Outline of History.' Therein it is
stated that "the main part of the Jewry never was in ludea and had never come
Out of Judea.” (From "Behind Communism, second 1952 edition, by Frank L.
Btitton.)

After the 1882 May Laws in Russia, "Anti-Semitism’ 1 was a term in¬
creasingly applied to Gentile criticisms or restrictions. These Jews adopted the
slogan "No Assimilation.’’ Communism, with its "common purpose” of world
dominion, and Zionism with its Palestine State of Israel abjective, were both
rooted in Russia.

History reports that the "King” of the Khazars (of Eastern Russia) adopted
for his mixed-Mongol people what Texas Methodist University Prof. John
beaty, author of an invaluable book "The Iron Curtain Over America,” rerms
"a form of the Jewish Religion” about 741 A.D.—which government was
destroyed and its territory confiscated by Slavs in the tenth century'.

I am in full accord with the "purge” program advocated by Dr. Beaty,
whom I never met, and of whom I had no knowledge during the 1933-1940
crusade. He says the later antagonism between Khazars and Slavs was "not
racial, but ideological.”

The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia reports "Khazar migration” to Russia,
Poland and Europe. That Encyclopedia stares that from earliest Russian times
its Government worked for complete exclusion of Jews.

The genesis of the world conspiracy rests in rabbi manifestoes that "Jews
are a people, one people,” with the intimation in prominent Jewish circles that
Jews comprise an "International People” whose center is now in the Palestine
State of Israel, founded by Zionist Jews.

The world conspiracy picture reflects Communist beginnings in the seven¬
teenth century with the so-called IUuminarti, whose grandiloquent objective was
proclaimed as abolition of national European governments and destruction of

2 5 3

Christian religious sects—which aim seems to have been inherited by Marxists.

To grasp the widely ramifying implications of the term "Anti-Semitic” it
is necessary to learn the aspirations and strategies of the dominant Khazar
Ashkenazi clement of "International Jewry.” a people constantly refusing to be
assimilated. These people have apparently usurped the title "Chosen People of
God,” originally "vested” in the Semite jews of Palestine, according to Biblical
history.

Jewish Scientist Albert Einstein provided a KEY unlocking the mystery of
"Anti-Semitism” when he proclaimed that ' The Jew remains a Jew” even when
he changes faith, name or position in life.

The term "Semite’ ’is only legitimately applied to members of the "Semite
Race”—Egyptians, Syrians, Arabs, aside from the Palestine Jew of old. Descend¬
ants of the anciently Judaized Khazars of eastern Russia, being of Mongolian
Asiatic races, could not logically hold themselves rightfully encitied to "a home”
in Palestine, having never been there as a people.

We now come to the core of a world plot for universal domination, not a
racist, but evidently a theological affair, predominantly.

"LESE MAJESTE”

On the face of the evidence, having acquired a mass-delusion of exalted
future grandeur impregnated by centuries of inbreeding, rabbi inculcation and
strict kosher training, these Mongol Jews have apparently arrogated to themselves
the theory that as "Chosen of God” none of chem can do wrong; that their
leadership is infallible, and they must therefore obey any order from the High
Command.

And for Gentiles to critically analyze and unmask fantastic aims and there¬
by become "Anti-Semitic," is "lese maieste.” Wouldn’t that explain why their
leadership, ignoring elementary justice, invariably rushes to the aid of the tribe
everywhere, whether or not guilt has been confessed?

Rabbis and other leaders are continually opposing assimilation into national
entities. Assimilation would not only eliminate rabbi monopolies; it would
destroy the ideal of the "common purpose” dream of world domination. It is
interesting to note that Protestant Christian leaders are beginning to use the
terms "Illusion,” "Myth” and "Nazi prototype” in alluding to this tribal state
within a state and its anti-assimilation attitude.

In a 1942 issue the Chicago Jewish Sentinel declared that "World War Two
is being fought for the fundamentals of Judaism.” Not for Americanism! And
when President Franklin D. Roosevelt publicly called for a descriptive title for
said war, an "Australian Jewess” is reported to have cabled; "War For Sur¬
vival.” Of what, the "Jewish People”?

"ANTI-SEMITISM PHARISAISM?

Being neither a churchman nor a Biblical theologian, the writer makes no
pretense of evaluating Fundamentalist or other strictly religious ethics, although
modern developments seem to reflect a very dose relationship. But truth in¬
struments seek light. Note this;

"PHARISAISM BECAME TALMUDISM; Talmudism became modem
Rabbinism . . , But throughout these changes in name . . , the spirit of the
ancient Pharisee SURVIVES UNALTERED. When the Jew studies the Talmud
he is accurately repeating arguments used in the Palestinean academies.” See

254

' The Pharisees; The Sociological Background of their Faith," 1946, The Jewish
Publication Society of America; edited by Prof. Louis Finkelstcdn of the Jewish
Theological Seminary of America.

In a 12-column scientific analysis indicating that Christ was not a Jew,
as Jews claim, appears the foregoing extract, published by "Common Sense,"
Anti-Communist newspaper of Union, N. J., February 1, 1953-

‘'Anti-Semitism means Pharisaism! The Christian who knows this will be
more understanding of the hatred borne for Christ by modern Pharisees. Christ’s
excoriation of Pharisaism and all it stands for is unequalled for sheer liquid fire
by any diatribe in history."—By Elizabeth Diliing in "The Defender" magazine,
January 1953 issue.

I know Elizabeth Diiling personally. She is the famous author of the "Red
Network," and stands high not only in Communist exposure but on the Christ¬
ian Bible and the Jewish Talmud—which, incidentally says "The Modern lew'
is the product of the Talmud." She is not alone in the thesis reached by years
of exhaustive study, that The Dispersion blazes the trail down the centuries to
today's Judaism as ancient Pharisaism carried into the Talmud (Jewish Bible)
"declared complete 500 A. D."—which was in the period of the existence of the
Kingdom of the Khazars who were mass-converted to Judaism.

"More than, six centuries lie petrified in the Talmud,” the very life-breath
of Jew's, their very soul, says H. Graetz in "History of the Jews,” 1893. Those
six centuries were followed by the Khazar conversion to Judaism. As interpreted
L-y the Pharisees?

A Biblical student at this point would probably ask himself: Does this
Khazar product "of the Talmud" mean that Khazars are "They of the Synagogue
of Satan which say they are Jews but are not and do lie” repeatedly so alluded
to in "Revelations?'' And is this "The Beast of Destruction" which Biblical
prophecy predicted would come "Out of the North"?

Acknowledging the accuracy of the fulfillment of prophesied general "tribu¬
lation” in today’s Communism, this secular writer suggests that the mass-circum¬
stantial evidence produced at least indicates WHO have been the champion
trouble-makers down the ages.

Apparently being confronted with what seems to be a religious crisis of
the first magnitude, I have been impelled merely to open perspectives and leave
the resolving process in the hands of religious theologists more competent to in¬
terpret mysterious prophesying.

Yet the honest investigator cannot refrain from posing below an interroga¬
tion evolved by latest developments:

Having been frustrated in their objectives by Christ’s Divine Denunciation,
"unequaled for sheer liquid fire,” did Pharisaic ancient leaders migrate from
Palestine north to Eastern Russia’s Caucasus, there find the Khazar descendants
of Asia receptive and convert them to judaism as they saw it and as delineated in
rhe Talmud which they are’reported as creating?

I wouldn’t be qualified to judge that bit of theology, but I can envision the
world-shaking secular possibilities should Christiandom broadcast an exposure
of seemingly the greatest HOAX in history as to '’BIBLICAL Jews.”

And it would appear to the lay mind that it is about rime for the Christian
ministry to become militant Christian Soldiers, banishing "The fear of the Jews"

2 5 5

and boldly end "silence on the Jewish Problems," so despairingly deprecated
by B. A. M. Shapiro ("By race a Jew, by Faith a Christian’") who published in
his "America’s Great Menace” that Communism was "hatched in the Camp of
Israel.”

"There is a certain community who really are not Jews, whose ancestors
were Asiatic people who became converts to Judaism during the earlier centuries
of the Christian Era. Most of these so-called Jews have rejected the Jewish Faith,
so that they are not now Jews in any sense of the w'ord, neither by race nor
religion.”—From "Israel 'Britain” by Rutherford, 1939, referring to the
Talmud,

But, you say, this is all fantastically impossible. How' can so small a minority
ever hope to gain domination over a world of more than two billion?

FANATICISM PRODUCES WONDERS

I can only repeat "how”?, and then point out that if such a small minority
group is frenziedly elevated by a paranoic delusion of grandeur into the brain¬
storm atmosphere of Lese Majeste, the idea may be fantastic but enthroned
emotional energy has achieved wonders thus far.

"World Jewry,” by "mastering all the secrets that lay hid in money,” and
becoming "Lords of Money,” have made themselves masters of the economic
world, with more than ample gold-power to subvert widely in politics and else-
v'here; and results appear to indicate that Jewry is well on its way to achieve
"The Jewish Common Purpose” dream, working secretly through the "terrible
power of the purse” and press, and openly by communizing unsuspecting non-
Jews into slavery.

Vast destruction has been accomplished through two world wars apparently
engineered by Jewish men who boast "We are at the bottom of nearly ail
your wars. We still dominate you through the mighty power of our spirit, ideas
and PROPAGANDA.”

What is to be concluded from the foregoing "confusion testimony?”

This: The Russian "puzzling Anti-Semitic” wails constitute nothing
more or less than a smokescreen diversion used to conceal continuing subversions
elsewhere—in promotion of "The Jewish Common Purpose” of world politico-
economic control—precisely the "Communist Line” deceit-strategy in other
fields.

Evidently in support of the new aggressive anti-Soviet policy of the Eisen¬
hower Administration, below is extracted vital conclusions from a scholarly and
convincing article by James Burnham in "This Week” section of the San Fran¬
cisco Chronicle of Feb, 8, 1953:

After demonstrating that the Truman-Acheson ''containment” policy is a
"formula for Soviet victory,” Mr. Burnham unequivocally declares that "If the
Communists merely succeed in consolidating what they have already conquered,
then their complete world victory is certain. There remains only a limited time
during which it will continue to be possible to move” against the Soviets.

I am fully in accord with that thesis. Is President Eisenhower? Intelligent
counter-aggression in this respect could well develop into Liberation Step No.
2, following the Nov. 4, 1952, U. S. national election repudiation of the New
Deal, which was Step No. 1.

2 5 6

"Anti-Semitism" was judicially declared not to be a crime under American
law, in a unanimous decision by the New Jersey State Supreme Court on Dec.
5, 1941, reversing a lower court conviction, unconditionally holding unconsti¬
tutional the State Rafferty Act (which made a misdemeanor of any public utter¬
ance that tended to incite "hatred, abuse, violence or hostility against any
group" regardless of race, color or creed), on the specific ground that it
"violated ... the guarantees of the Federal Constitution in the matter of free¬
dom of speech."

"Now, over two-thirds of the Jewish People of the world live in America”
Dr. Cecil Roth, Oxford history teacher and world Jewish Leader, told Kansas
City Jews in Temple B'nai B’rith, Jehuda, Mar. 18, 1952, as reported in the
Kansas City Star of Mar. 29 , 1952.—From The Beacon Light Herald of Atas-
cadera, Calif., of March, 1953. That Jewish estimate indicates that the total
Jewish U. S. population is over 10,000,000 plus "cryptos." If the ancient Jewish
custom of enumerating males only is still effective, the total could be
25,000,000.

The $64 question inevitably arises:

Do we Americans want our laws, administration and judging done by
members of a group of "peculiar people" who refuse to become genuine
Americans by opposing assimilation, and who themselves , are apparently shot
through with paranoia inculcated by centuries of inbreeding and morbid dwell¬
ing on a fanciful delusion of grandeur as well as a self-induced defence-persecu¬
tion by the Gentile world they label "the common enemy?”

GREATEST CRIME IN HISTORY

No collective Crime in the annals of history parallels the Jewish subversion
of the American Republic. Never had there been so charitable a people!

With limitless sympathy and tolerance unexcelled, America welcomed to
its hospitality from every land the oppressed, the despairing, the victims of
tyranny. Opening wide the Gates of Freedom with unequalled opportunity and
boundless wealth beyond, The Republic generously offered asylum.

And how did Jewish leadership requite? Jewish refugees—"wretched
refuse from Europe’s teeming shore" (Emma Lazarus on the Statue of Liberty)
were moved in—and their New Deal took over.

Treacherously betraying American friendship benevolence, they, with
incredible ingratitude, crowded us and our children out of the avenues of econ¬
omic reward. With financial intimidation, they subverted to their own ends the
channels of inter-communication; with seditionist intent, rejecting assimilation
into this American organism, they usurped the administration of our political
system with its equal rights for all and special privileges for none—planning
socialist-communist revolution and the destruction of our republic-form of
government.

Throughout Christian civilization, historical records show that Jews have
been expelled from every great nation. Holding themselves superior and aloof,
they have not only refused absorption into national organisms, but, in "fatuous
effrontery," lusting for supreme power, they sought to tear down institutions
and cultures they could not emulate, and substitute therefor the unworkable
materialistic international ideology of leveling-down communism to the lowest
possible common denominator.

And that once true AMERICAN metropolis of New York is now mass-
leveled under the rule of "UN" Communists, Jews and gold, with Gentile minds
growing cold and cramped and sordid, commerce losing its invigorating soul,
with the arts sinking into blatant vulgarity and hypocrisy governing courtesy!

2 5 7

A MASS PURGE ESSENTIAL?

"American publicity channel, MUST BE FREED FROM JEWISH AD¬
VERTISING AND OTHER INTIMIDATION,” declared Edmondson Bulletin
to patriots on April 3= 1939; "political jews MUST WITHDRAW from dl
key positions to permit restoration of American majority REPREoEN i A i I v h
CONSTITUTIONAL Government in place of centralized invisible rule;
MONOPOLIES of leadership of national and local political parties by Jewish
key controls MUST BE ELIMINATED; Jewish Capital MUST RETIRE Uom
its anti-social monopoly of screen, radio and other American NECESSI „
ENTERPRISES; Jewish professors and teachers MUST BF FUl UL i ur-
mstitutions of learning; Jewish corruption of the Judiciary of America MUST
BF OUSTED; Jewish promotion of Communistic propaganda against American
liberties MUST CEASE; International Jewish financial domination of America's
monetary system MUST BE DESTROYED, recognition of the Jewish Soviet
Murder'Government MUST BE RECALLED because ot deliberately broken
Communist propaganda pledges and slaughter of Christian millions.

"American Jewry has been indicted and arraigned for POLITICAL, ECON¬
OMIC, SOCIAL anti-American activities. It has been charged with placing
Jewish’interests OVER ALL in America, as 'a nation within a nation,’ with con¬
ducting a destructive economic program against American business; with finan¬
cial promotion of revolutionary internationalist Communism and undermining
the very American institutions which welcomed and sheltered it from oppression ,
with crowding American talent out of the Avenues _ of Opportunity through
ruthless economic power; with ADOPTING and fulfilling in America the dia¬
bolical anti-Gentile super-government .plans of- the so-called Protocols of the
Elders of Zion, -whose AUTHORSHIP they deny without disproving the
charge that Jews employ those plans.

"Nothing but a general 'smear’ denial—wmch is NO ANSWER—has been
entered against evidence, factual, documentary and circumstantial, including
direct Jewish confessions of guilt.

"An American Jury IS GOING TO RENDER A VERDICT SOMEDAY!
CAN it be other than 'Guilty? And in view of the 'No answer,' with boastful
collateral 'defi/ CAN the sentence of punishment be otherwise than PUNITIVE?

"The struggle converges on our country, which has been seized through
secret controls of the Press, Politics and Economics. Here is the LAST STAND
of the foe. All national doors are dosed to mass-immigration.

"If we fail, through FALSE FEAR and selfishness, to circumvent this
diabolical plot, SUPREME SACRIFICES ARE INEVITABLE. America is
now in "FULL CRISIS!" And I cannot impress it upon you too earnestly—"IT
IS LATER THAN YOU THINK!’-'

Precisely six months later World War TWO began, into which greatest
conflict, "being fought for the fundamentals of JUDAISM"—not Americanism
_the Roosevelt Jew Dealers forced the United States in 1941.

THE JEWISH PROBLEM IN SOLUTION

What is a practical solution of the pressing World Jewish Problem, with
simple Justice 'for Gentile and Jew? The following proposals have been made:

(1) Kill the Jews—which is unthinkable.

(2) STERILIZATION of Jews—which is out of the question.

(3) DEPORTATION, on the ground that American citizenships have
been acquired under false pretenses, which kind of expulsion has been operat¬
ing under law in the U. S. effectively for sometime past. But we are considering

2 5 8

here the case of Jews who entered the U. S, citizenship not to become loyal
citizens of The Republic, but who came with the aggressive hostile invasion
ideology of an active anti-assimilation intent to destroy”our form of government
and dominate. Could such a contention be legally proved through overt acts
committed by all individual jews? Could there be a "dean sweep," which
would be absolutely necessary to achieve real results? 1 doubt it!

(A) STATE VOTING POWER DISCRIMINATION. Each state has
power to discriminate and decide WHO shall vote in state and national elections.
Even if successful, whicn is doubtrul, the U. S. Supreme Court might rule
that such a law violated the U. S. National Constitution. In any case, the
terrible power of the purse" would still be exerted to subvert if Jews were al¬
lowed to remain as aliens.

(5) POPULATION PERCENTAGE ALLOTMENT, Could efforts be
successful in alloting "5 c /;' of the total population to individual Jews in var¬
ious professions and businesses, where activities now are conducted in many
cases under Gentile names?' What would prevent Jewish wealth from overcom¬
ing this and other similar discriminatory action?

(6) NATIONAL DISFRANCHISEMENT, by Constitutional amend¬
ment, requiring Jewish deportation automatically. How could such a decree be
enforced en masse and still be in harmony with individual justice; especially
since this writer knows of numerous instances were some individual Jews have
exhibited strenuous opposition to the New Deal treasonable leadership but who
are fearful of "liquidation’’ if they do not obey the "High Command."

(/) SEGREGATION of all Jews. How can crypto (secret) Jews be
uncovered to effective action? If put in ghettos such restrictions would not avert
subversion via the money channel, of which International Jewry is master. In
the past Rothchild loans enslaved widely and are still in operation.

Made A WORLD POLITICAL affair with genuine international co¬
operation by Jew' as well as Gentile, segregation could be effective But exper-
tence has taught that the present Jewish High Command misleading Jewry
wDch has been rabbi-inculcated ro regard that false leadership as infallible
wou d not give up without a world-shaking revolution, with Communism ready
to take over in the chaos resulting. /

■ t n ,° 0f ^ er wa y 0ut - ? * th»nk there is; but it involves a definite chance

in Jewish leadership, and not through new prophets as some Christian clergy
suggest; for, judging from the historic record, Hebrew prophets got nowhere
even when they correctly foreshadowed later realized tribulations, including
ordeals which present-day Jews are meeting in the Communist Soviet cold war
Anti-Semitic purging.

"The Free World" now proposes to take the initiative away from Moscow
by promoting aggressive counter-revolution among satellite states, the entrenched
Iron Curtain first defense-line of Russia’s Communist Government.

Why not strike first at the CAUSE of the Communism as represented by
the overwhelming domination of Jews m the Bolshevist Revolution m 1917-18?

Who would be THE Leader to take the Jews out of such "captivity?"

Preliminary to that, however, and doing first things first, let’s look back
into contemporary history a little way and note the following from the late
Iheodor Herz., apparently revered by Jewish masses throughout the world,
what is the record of that "non-conformist rabbi" who passed away in 1904
but who, after death, was memorialized in 1929 in a symposium of prominent

2 5 9

Jewish names: and whose "Jewish State, an Attempt at a Modern Solution of
the Jewish Question," written in 1895, was published in 19by the Central
Office of the Zionist World Organization in London for Jewish circulation, with
a foreword by Israel Cohen saying:

"One of his oldest friends to whom Herzl submitted the manuscript, re¬
turned it with deepest alarm; he feared Herzl was out of his mind, and begged
him not to publish it. He also advised him to show the manuscript to Dr. Max
Nordau, famous as a psychiatrist. The result was that Nordau not only vindi¬
cated the sanity of Herzl, but declared himself ready to assist him . . . Herzl’s
enthusiasm and courage grew. His ideas, while evoking sympathy in some
quarters, provoked the bitterest opposition in others ... He convened the First
Zionist Congress in Basle in 1897.

Herzl’s "Jewish State" contains this unprecedented Jewish "anti-Semitic”
confession: "The Jewish Question exists wherever Jews live in perceptible
numbers. Where it does not exist, it is carried by Jews in their migrations. Our
presence produces persecution. The Jewish Question is no more a social than a
religious one. It is a national question which can only be solved by making it
a political WORLD Question.”

To this writer, the foregoing paragraph is die best brief description of
"anti-Semitism” ever published. ’

Herzl elucidates with rare clarity the complex aspects of "Anti-Semitism.”
Said he in "The Jewish State”:

"l believe I understand anti-Semitism. I consider it from a Jewish stand¬
point, without fear or hatred. I can see what elements there are in it of vulgar
sport, of common trade, jealousy and inherited prejudice, of religious intoler¬
ance, of pretended self-defense. It sometimes takes these forms and others; but it
is a world political question,

"It is useless for the Jews to be loyal patriots (of the nations in which they
now live). Assimilation means not only in dress, habits, customs and language,
but also comprises identity of feeling and manner. Such assimilation could only
be effected, by inter-marriage; but the need for mixed marriage would have to
be felt by the majority; recognition by law would not suffice.

"The Jews are a BOURGEOIS PEOPLE. If the power they now possess
creates indignation among anti-Semites, what outbreaks would not occur with an
increase of power? Hence, the first step toward absorption will never be taken,
because it would involve the subjection of the majority to a hitherto scorned
minority possessing neither military nor administrative power of its own.

"Where Jews now feel comfortable, it will probably be violently disputed
by them. The longer anti-Semitism lies in abeyance, the more fiercely will it
break put.

"Because I have drawn this conclusion with complete indifference to every¬
thing but the quest of truth, I shall probably be opposed by Jews who are in
easy circumstances. They can safely be ignored, for the concerns of the poor and
oppressed are of greater importance than theirs. It is true that in countries where
we live in perceptible numbers the positions of Jewish lawyers, doctors, teachers,
employees, daily becomes intolerable. The nations in whose midst Jews live'
are all, either covertly or openly, anti-Semitic.

"We have attained pre-eminence in finance because mediaeval conditions
(ghetto) drove us to it. Being on the stock exchange, we are exposed afresh to
contempt. Educated Jews are now fast becoming socialists. We stand in the most
exposed positions in the camps of socialists and capitalists.

260

"OUR TERRIBLE POWER OI : THE PURSE"

"Modern anti-Semitism is not to be classed with the religious persecution
of former times. The very impossibility of getting at the Jews embitters hatred
of them. Anti-Semitism is bound to increase because the causes of its growth
cannot be removed. When we sink, we become a revolutionary proletariat, sub¬
ordinate officers of all revolutionary parties; and when we rise, there rises also
our terrible power of the purse. The oppression we endure does not improve us,
for we are not one whit better than ordinary people,’’

(No "Chosen People" racket in that,)

In the Herzl Memorial, Clemenceau, the great Frenchman, called Herzl a
rare genius who fought for high destiny against his own people. But he won
their post mortem crown of immortality!

Rabbi Abba Hillel Silver, Zionist leader, was selected to deliver the open¬
ing prayer at the January presidential inauguration. During the Communist
picketing of the White House for Rosenberg clemency. Rabbi Silver added his
clemency plea, without avail. He told Californians on arrival in San Francisco
Feb. 23 (reported the San Francisco Examiner of Feb. 24, 1953), his version
of the Soviet ''anti-Semitism," saying it stemmed from political leanings of the
State of Israel toward the western free world contingent; adding that he would
like to see more American business investing in Israel’s activities, which would
benefit the Israeli. Which would seem also to indicate that even Jewish Com¬
munists in Russia could not forget their Jewish anti-assimilation tradition of
"domination or downfall."

On Page 254 of the Herzl Memorial of 1929 appears an article by Rabbi
Abba Hillel Silver entitled "Herzl and Jewish Messianism: Nationalism as a
Means to a Greater Goal." In it Rabbi Silver says:

"The Jewish Messianic hope was born not in helplessness but in power. It
sprang into being when the RACE awakened to a realization of the unique and
amazing career which destiny had carved out for it . . . This dogma was INTER¬
NATIONAL in character because Jewish Nationalism was then a fact, not a
problem; a people can be international in outlook only when its own National
Life is secure ... It was missionary in spirit ... It concerned Palestine only as
the pou sto ("where we stand"), FROM WHICH VANTAGE POINT
ISRAEL COULD MOVE 1 HE WORI.D \” Toward world domination?

Upon Rabbi Abba has apparently fallen the Jewish Leadership mantle of
the late Rabbi Stephen Wise, President of the American Jewish Congress—
with this difference: Rabbi Stephen’s public platform appearance was character¬
ized by belligerent bellows for "Mutual Tolerance;" with open war on. "Anti-
Semitism;" punctuated by occasional wails "I have been betrayed!”—as when
he was served with a subpoena by the defense in the Edmondson Jewish Religion
group libel case. Not so Rabbi Abba, who enters the scene unobstrusively with
rubber-sole-like subtlety. Which recalls the ancient warning: "The words of
his mouth were smoother than butter, but war was in his heart.” (Psalm 15:21.)

I have no knowledge that individuals named herein who seem to be un-
American, are not true to THEIR convictions; but as a loyal citizen I have no
alternative but to do MY DUTY to The Republic by placing my beliefs before
fellow-countrymen for their information and judgment.

Careful reading of this Herzl book of exceptionally independent thinking on
a very high plane, the auchor of which won the Jewish accolade of '’immor¬
tality” from tribal friend and foe, shows that while the Herzl Jewish Political

2 6 1

State Plan first mentioned Palestine because of religious associations involved,
lie also referred to Argentine, Uganda and other locations, but said specifically:
"WE SHALL TAKE WHAT IS GIVEN US.” On Page 26 he adds: "Let
sovereignty be granted to us over a portion of the globe large enough to satisfy
the rightful requirements of a nation—the rest we will manage for ourselves.”

"He then elaborates in detail his plan, which he proposes to have carried
out by two Jewish agencies, one to do preparatory work, the other to see to "the
realization of business interests of departing Jews" from the lands wherein they
have been resident.

The plan envisions that "The departure of the Jews will necessarily be
gradual, continuous, and cover many decades. The poorest will go first to culti¬
vate the soil. , . . The Governments scourged by Anti-Semitism will be keenly
interested in assisting us to obtain the sovereignty we want.

"The departure of Jews will involve no economic disturbances; in fact, the
countries they abandon will revive to a new period of prosperity. There will be
migration of Christian citizens into positions evacuated by Jews.

"Should the powers declare themselves willing to admit our sovereignty over
a neutral piece of land, then the Jews will enter into negotiations for possession
. . . We could offer possessors of the promised land enormous advantages, take
upon ourselves part of the public debt, etc.”

"The new Jewish State must be properly founded, with due regard for our
future HONORABLE position in the world. Therefore every obligation in che
old countries must be SCRUPULOUSLY FULFILLED. We shall not wait for
reciprocity. We shall act purely for the sake of our own HONOR,

"Social dissatisfaction would be appeased during the years which the emi¬
gration of the Jews would occupy, and set it at rest during the whole transition
period . . .

"I think a democratic monarchy and an aristocratic republic" said Herzl,
"are the finest forms of a state, because in them the form of the state and the
principle of government are opposed, and they thus preserve a true balance of
power ... A democracy without a sovereign’s useful counterpoise is extreme in
appreciation and condemnation . . . produces professional politicians. NATIONS
ARE NOT FIT FOR UNLIMITED DEMOCRACY ... The masses are more
prone ... to be swayed by vigorous ranting. It is impossible to formulate a wise
international or internal policy in a popular assembly . . . Politics must shape
in the upper strata and work downward.”

James Madison, "Father of the U. S. Constitution” published: "A Dem¬
ocracy is incompatible with personal security and the right of private property.”

HERZL AGAINST DEMOCRACY

Herzl not only appears to be in accord with Madison but categorically
against the following by the Central Conference of American Rabbis printed in
the N. Y. Times of Sep. 13, 1936: "There is only one way in which the Ameri¬
can people can escape Fascism and Communism, and that is by establishing A
THOROUGHLY SOCIALIZED DEMOCRACY.” Webster's International
Dictionary describes "Social Democracy” as like Communism of Russia.

Amazingly, Herzl directly challenges, in the following striking words,
the ballyhooed ideal of the U. S. National Conference of Jews and Christians
to promote "more tolerance,” already beyond the limit:

"UNIVERSAL BROTHERHOOD IS NOT EVEN A BEAUTIFUL

2 62

DREAM. ANTAGONISM IS ESSENTIAL TO MAN'S GREATEST EF-
VORTS, The famous British Author, Nesta H. Webster, endorses the latter
when she emphasizes that without "ANTI” the opposition loses that essential to
victory, dynamic power, declaring that simply to be "pro” is not enough.

Herzl called for a 14-hour workday in the new state with two 7-hour
shifts,, to get maximum production without sweatshop methods.

Jews who might prefer assimilation and refuse to migrate, but who may
try to carry on subversions, can easily be taken care of by a new press that
will be free to expose wrong-doing in all quarters.

I leave it to any intelligent mind, Non-Jew or Jew, as to whether
or not the foregoing principles enunciated by Herzl are sound as such,

Where would Jews go now? Millions are already in over-crowded Palestine-
Israel (which is surrounded by other over-populated and unproductive states)
unable even to feed itself; and it is compelled to make continual financial aid
appeals to the United States; also asking military assistance to protect it from
surrounding enemies whose steadily expanding hostility is due to Jewish aggres¬
sion in the establishment and promoting of "Israel.”

If massive migration takes place to "Israel” from Russia under Communist
anti-Semitism” what can be done to avert starvation? RE-SHIPMENT TO THF
UNITED STATES? No!

Where, then? TO MADAGASCAR, a fertile island as large as California
off the southeast coast of South Africa, not far from Palestine.

How could Madagascar be made available? France once offered it to Jews
for colonization, and at a riduclously kw price, considering Jewry’s bilKons.
And France would welcome the money to pay oppressive national debts,

The outstanding feature of this Herzl plan is its implied brand of "FALSE”
with which it labels the present Jewish Leadership, which has materialistically
perverted the British peace pledge of a religious "Homeland” for Jews "longing
for a return to Zion.” & 6

Under the heading "False Leadership,” on Aug. 1, 1934, Robert Edward
Edmondson wrote the following open letter to Rabbi Stephen S. Wise Zionist
leader in New York:

Amazed by the astounding anti-American implications conveyed in your
rerenl Pres.denhal call for an American-Jewish Parliament. I am addressing you
as below m plain language: 6 1

Your Parliamentary summons declares: "We.are on the threshold of a battle
for the preservation of our existence. The time has come when the Jews of
America must acknowledge themselves and act as a people, not only where
European Jewry is concerned, but where they themselves are concerned.”

Why so_ preposterous a cal) to Jews to "battle for the preservation of exis¬
tence here in tolerant America, with their own leaders, Bernard M Baruch

-TWr • f he D Bro , okl >; n ^aminer (Oct. 20, 1933), the high title of

"Founder^ f IN Un,ted St “ es; Judge Samuel !■ Rosenman

NewDeah- B “' ^ ^

r w An /^°n g m br D 0ad: - ° u S ht not J ewish Leadership be satisfied with having
captured All the Russians with the Communist Council of 565, of which,

263

according to U. S. Congressional Records, 469' were Jews; to say nothing of
dominating the British Regime by Socialistic "fronts;” and holding international
banking control through the Rothschild "Hidden Hand"—to quote the "Red”
Protocols, whose executed plans overcame Russia and whose prophecies were
fulfilled in the New Deal legislation already enacted by an amazingly subserv¬
ient Washington Congress?

Why this constant preachment of combat against racial prejudice and a sum¬
mons for "economic re-orientation of Jews based On trends, opportunities and
reeds—to maintain unity"? Does this imply further welding of the Jews into "a
nation within a nation' 1 ?

Americans are beginning to ask: Is this Jewish Parliament called for the
purpose of staging another of those periodic wailing-walls notorious in history
as "sounding-boards" for outcries of "persecution."

Before it is too late, might it not be wise for this leadership to sincerely
direct the tremendous Jewish energy, talents, perseverance, determination and
willingness to work, into patriotic American constructive channels, instead of
nursing an increasingly dangerous antagonism that has come to be universally
denounced and branded as Jewishness."

JEWISH LEADERSHIP AFTER DEAD SEA WEALTH

To unmask the proven fallacy of the "religious association” appeal for
Palestine acquisition, propagandized throughout the world by false Jewish
Leadership for "moving in and taking over," it is but necessary to "think
materialistically" and learn that the Dead Sea mineral wealch of several trillion
dollars was probably the real underlying profit motive of the gentlemen in the
Middle East "pile.”

And that is not all. Note the strong socialistic and communistic elements
now in Israel, where many communities are reported living "in communism";
and then recall Herzl’s ANTI-Democracy-Communism principles proposed for
his new Jewish political state.

On Page 70 of his state outline he says:

"I incline toward the aristocratic republic. INDIVIDUAL ENTERPRISE
MUST NEVER BE CHECKED," which approves the American individualism
concept. "WE SHALL SCRUPULOUSLY RESPECT THE RIGHTS OF THE
INDIVIDUAL. Private property, which is the economic basis of independence,
shall be developed freely. The people is the personal, land the impersonal
groundwork of a state, and the personal basis is the more important of the two.”

Herzl must have been reading American history when he wrote on Page
71, "Shall we end by having a theocracy? No! We shall keep our priests within
the confines of their temples. THEY MUST NOT INTERFERE IN THE
ADMINISTRATION OF THE STATE,"

Memorial testimonials to Herzl from both opponents and proponents in
Jewry contain the following:

"The laurels of Immortality" were wrested (by Herzl) in the hour of
death from seeming failure."—Chaim Weismann, first President of the Jewish
State in Palestine. He was not a pro-Herzl Zionist.

"The nobiest soul in Judah is not dust," wrote Jewish Poet Israel Zangwill
after Herzl’s death, in a glowing poetic tribute.

264

"The entire Jewish people must mourn the loss of this lofty personality.
Among his Jewish contemporaries not one approached him. His championing of
justice, honor and freedom brought him public approval. The power behind
him was moral. The Zionist idea existed before Herzl. To us East European
Jews he was a brother."—Nahum Sokoloff, who said Jews created the League
of Nations after a 25 year .struggle.

"The stony soil, the lack of humus, the dearth of fauna and the scanty
flora seemed to me insurmountable obstacles to any (Jewish) colonization of
Palestine. Consideration of climate, physical nature and racial psychology result¬
ed in a definitely negative conclusion in my mind. Like Zangwill, I preferred
colonization on a large scale in Argentine, in Texas, or Uganda. Palestine meant
nothing co the great financier de Hirsch, for it w'as impossible to grow grain
there. But I, non-Zionist . . . pay homage to Zionist Leader Herzl (in a mem¬
orial address).—Ludwig Stc-in, German Professor of Philosophy.

"The announcement of Theodor Herzl’s sudden death in 1904, in the
throes of the Uganda plan, found English Zionists in a state of turmoil and
disorganization. The Jewish Colonial Trust had been launched in 1899 as the
financial instrument of the Zionist Organization."—Paul Goodman.

" ’The return to Zion’ must be preceded by the return to Judaism," said
Herzl, from whose diaries the following features are taken:

He does not say Palestine or any other specific place—merely "over there."

"I want to do everything openly and clearly, within absolutely legal limits"
Herzl told the Grand Duke of Baden.

Herzl quotes the Sultan of Turkey as saying regarding Palestine: "The
Turkish Empire (in which then was Palestine) does not belong to me, but to
the Turkish People. Let the Jews keep their billions."

"The Jews who are comfortable are my enemies. Thus I begin to have the
right to be the greatest anti-Semite of all."—Herzl.

Describing his first visit to Palestine on an expedition "by command’' of
the Kaiser, Herzl wrote in his dairy: "Poverty, desolation and fearful heat." He
quotes the Kaiser as saying the land "needs water, much wacer, above every¬
thing else, water!” (Scarce in Palestine).

On Dec. 29, 1899, Herzl wrote: "Yesterday I had a talk with Oscar Straus,
American Ambassador to Turkey. He considers Palestine unattainable for us,
as the Greek and Roman Catholic Church would not permit it."

In his "Jewish State,” first written in 1895, (published in England 1936),
Herzl, who died in 1904, said on Page 30: "Shall we choose Palestine or
Argentina? WE SHALL TAKE WHAT IS GIVEN US, selected by Jewish
public opinion."

In 1936 on February 7, the London Jewish Chronicle printed a letter from
S. Landman, former Jewish Propaganda Agent of the British Government,
saying: "The only way to induce the American President (Woodrow Wilson)
to come into the World War (1914-18) was to secure the co-operation of Zion¬
ist Jewry by promising them Palestine. The Zionists carried out their part and
helped bring America into the war." A Tune 15, 1936, Associated Press cable
from London reported: "The promise of a National HOME FOR JEWS in
Palestine to gain WORLDWIDE JEWISH SUPPORT for the Allied Cause in
the World War, was detailed to the House of Commons today by David Lloyd
George, Premier, as follows: 'We came to the conclusion that it was most vital
to have the co-operation of the Jews throughout the world, I bear testimony to
the fact that the Jews responded. They were helpful in America and even in
Russia.’ "

2 65

The 1936 Landman statement unmasked AN ACT OF WAR against "the
best friend Jewry ever had’ among the nations, according to James P. Warburg,
a prominent New York Jewish^banker, in a statement to Robert Edward
Edmondson at a 1934 conference on Communism's dangers.

Under "Theodor Hc-rzl” the Columbia University Encyclopedia records:
"He was born in Budapest, 1S60, Hungarian Jew, journalist and dramatist,
founder of Modern Zionism, died in 1904, buried in Jerusalem.

The same publication under Zionism says it is a movement for re-constitut¬
ing a Jewish Nation; that Herzl called the first 'World Zionist Congress at
Basel in 1897. American Jew's furnished most of the money for Zionist activities.
The first issue to split Zionists was whether Palestine was essential to the Jewish
State. Led by Israel Zangwiil those in opposition withdrew from the organiza¬
tion. The British Government issued the Balfour Declaration (after 1916) prom¬
ising to aid in establishing "a home’’ in Palestine for the Jewish People WITH
THE PROVISO that the rights of non-Jewish communities would be respected.
The Jewish State was proclaimed May 14, 1948. The World Jewish Con¬
gress was separated from the Israel Government.

Two decades after Herzl’s death Jewish Leadership established the Jewish
Political State of Israel in Palestine and immediately engaged in warlike activi¬
ties against the Arabs in violation of the pact under which a "Jewish Home¬
land” was promised with the proviso that non-Jewish rights wmuld be respected.
The 1917 Jewish "Sell out of America,” with repudiation of Arab rights, plus
HoLy Land assassinations and later bombing of the Russian Embassy, all make
plain that the Palestine Political State of Israel was conceived in warlike treach¬
ery and established and maintained by war, cold or hot.

It is anciently written that he who lives by the sword dies by the sword. Is
that to be the fateful end of the political state in Palestine?

RUSSIAN-MOSLEM "PINCERS”

HerzI’s Jewish opponents who could not accept his broad humanitarian
ideals of Jew-Gentile benefit did not hesitate to exploit the strictly Jewish ideal
of a ’ "Return to Jerusalem," to promote their temporal objectives. Undoubtedly
materialistic minds were lured by the dazzling prospect of world control under
the aegis of the wealth of the Middle East and Jewish "toll-gate control ’ be¬
tween the Orient and the Occident. The prospect of a "Return to Jerusalem"
provided enormous emotional energy to the Palestine Plan, absent as to other
sites for the Jewish Political State. But the materialistic objectives appear to have
already been upset by the inarch of